Instant Ebooks Textbook Thinking Like A Historian Rethinking History Instruction 1st Edition Nikki Mandell Download All Chapters
Instant Ebooks Textbook Thinking Like A Historian Rethinking History Instruction 1st Edition Nikki Mandell Download All Chapters
com
https://ebookgate.com/product/thinking-like-a-
historian-rethinking-history-instruction-1st-
edition-nikki-mandell/
https://ebookgate.com/product/nightwork-a-history-of-hacks-and-
pranks-at-mit-institute-historian-t-f-peterson/
https://ebookgate.com/product/you-may-ask-yourself-an-
introduction-to-thinking-like-a-sociologist-dalton-conley/
https://ebookgate.com/product/a-natural-history-of-human-
thinking-michael-tomasello-2/
https://ebookgate.com/product/a-natural-history-of-human-
thinking-michael-tomasello/
You may ask yourself an introduction to thinking like a
sociologist 3rd ed Edition Conley
https://ebookgate.com/product/you-may-ask-yourself-an-
introduction-to-thinking-like-a-sociologist-3rd-ed-edition-
conley/
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-everything-lateral-thinking-
puzzles-book-hundreds-of-puzzles-to-help-you-think-outside-the-
box-nikki-katz/
https://ebookgate.com/product/shakespeare-s-history-plays-
rethinking-historicism-1st-edition-neema-parvini/
https://ebookgate.com/product/high-speed-trains-all-aboard-nikki-
bruno-clapper/
THINKING LIKE A HISTORIAN:
rethinking history instruction
wHat questions do we ask of tHe past? How? wHat? wHere? wHen? wHy? wHo?
How do How do
How can we find out? How do we evaluate tHe evidence?
we know? we know?
wHat matters? wHy does it matter?
wHat questions do we ask of tHe past? How? wHat? wHere? wHen? wHy? wHo?
wHat questions do we ask of tHe past? How? wHat? wHere? wHen? wHy? wHo?
cause and effect cHange and continuity
•what were the causes of
past events? • what has changed?
How can we find out? How do we evaluate tHe evidence?
Reuse of material from Thinking like a Historian, ISBN 978-0-87020-438-8, for educational purposes is
acceptable under the fair use doctrine. For permission to reuse material for all other purposes, please access
www.copyright.com or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA
01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety
of users.
Photos by permission of Janet Elzy (pp. 34, 54), John Hallagan (pp. 78, 79, 104), and the Wisconsin Historical Society
(pp. 2, 50, 81, 88).
For further information on applying Thinking like a Historian and its concepts in the classroom contact:
Nikki Mandell, History Department, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater
[email protected]
Bobbie Malone, Office of School Services, Wisconsin Historical Society
[email protected]
∞ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for
Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992.
Authors and Contributors
Nikki Mandell, earned her Ph.D in history at the University of California-Davis. She is a member of the history department at
the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater where she teaches American and global women’s history, U.S. business history, U.S.
social history and courses in historical methods and research. She is the author of The Corporation as Family: The Gendering
of Corporate Welfare, 1890–1930. Dr. Mandell is co-chair of her university’s Social Studies Council. She served as project
director and participating historian in the Teaching American History program that developed and field-tested the Thinking Like
a Historian framework.
Bobbie Malone is Director of the Office of School Services at the Wisconsin Historical Society. With a master’s degree in
elementary education, she taught school for ten years in Louisiana and Texas before taking a doctorate in American History
from Tulane University. Dr. Malone is the author of Rabbi Max Hiller: Reformer, Zionist, Southerner, 1860–1929 and co-author
of the textbook Wisconsin: Our State, Our Story, which is designed around the Thinking Like a Historian framework. She has
authored and edited many other student books and teacher’s guides on Wisconsin history for the state’s classrooms. She served
as a project partner in the Teaching American History program that developed and field-tested the Thinking Like a Historian
framework.
Angela Bazan earned her Bachelor’s degree in Education from the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater in 1998. Since then,
she has been teaching social studies at Deerfield High School, in Deerfield, Wisconsin. Ms. Bazan teaches a wide variety of
subjects including US History, Sociology, Diversity, American Government and Advanced Placement American Government.
She grew up with a love of history and enjoys fueling that passion by igniting the same interest in her students. Ms. Bazan was
a Teaching Fellow with the Teaching American History Teaching program from 2003–2006.
Janet Regina Elzy migrated with her family from Shannon, Mississippi to South Beloit, Illinois, when she was a child. She
earned a B.S. in History Education from Northern Illinois University in 1976. Ms. Elzy holds two Masters degrees (in reading
and in learning disabilities) and special education certificates for the states of Illinois and Wisconsin. She has instructed special
needs students in language arts and social studies for twenty-five years at South Beloit High School in Illinois, and Aldrich
Middle School in Beloit, Wisconsin. Ms. Elzy began teaching American history at the middle school level in 2003, the year she
became a Teaching American History Teaching Fellow. This TAH experience had a profound effect. Her history classes engage
students in critical thinking as “investigators of the past and present.” She received a statewide Herb Kohl Teacher of the Year
Award in 1994 and a School District of Beloit All Star Teaching Award in 1995.
John Hallagan earned his Bachelors degree from Marquette University in 1975 and his Masters degree in Education from
National Louis University in 1993. He has been teaching in Wisconsin public schools for 28 years, the past 12 at Magee
Elementary School in the School District of Kettle Moraine in Waukesha. Mr. Hallagan wrote curriculum on immigration history
for the American Immigration Law Foundation, runs an annual writers workshop for children and has worked as a teacher
advisor with the Teaching American History program for four years. He received the Wisconsin History Teacher of the Year
Award from the Gilder Lehrman Foundation in 2005.
Tom Howe earned a Bachelors degree from the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point and a Masters degree in History from
Virginia Tech. He taught middle school and high school history and social studies for 25 years, most recently at Monona Grove
High School in Monona, Wisconsin. Mr. Howe teaches an annual Advanced Placement History summer institute for fellow
educators and is the author of The Petersburg Campaign: Wasted Valor, June 15–18, 1864. He is currently working with the
New Teacher Center at the University of California-Santa Cruz, which works to build strong mentor programs. He has received
a number of awards, including the Wisconsin Teacher of the Year (1995) and the United States-Russia-Ukraine Award for
Excellence in Teaching (1997). He is most delighted that in 1994 the senior class of Monona Grove High School selected him
to receive the first Teacher Appreciation Award.
Tim Keal has taught high school social studies for 8 years at Sun Prairie High School, Sun Pairie, Wisconsin. His classes
include world history, U.S. history, economics, international relations and legal studies. Mr. Keal was an active Teaching
American History Teaching Fellow for three years and, for the past two years has worked full time as a new teacher mentor
with the Sun Prairie Area School District.
Mike McKinnon is Curriculum Coordinator for the Janesville School District, Wisconsin. He earned Bachelors and Masters
degrees in History at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He has been an educator for 40 years, including 18 years teaching
high school history and, more recently, as an instructor at Cardinal Stritch University in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Mr. McKinnon
is former President of the Wisconsin Council for the Social Studies and former Chair, Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
Sub-Committee on the Teaching of History. He served as a project partner in the Teaching American History program that
developed and field-tested the Thinking Like a Historian framework.
THINKING LIKE A HISTORIAN:
rethinking history instruction
We invite you to use Thinking Like a Historian to bring history into your classroom or to
reenergize your teaching of this crucial discipline in new ways.
The work that follows is the fruit of our thinking and practice grounded in the highest standards
of the discipline – designed to stimulate your own thinking, planning, and teaching. Read it as
a philosophical and pedagogical guide to history as a discipline. Use it to support curriculum
development and professional development. Adapt or draw inspiration from the examples for
engaging and effective lessons and classroom activities. Return again and again to the common
language of Thinking Like a Historian as a foundation that can connect and develop students’
curiosity about and understanding of history throughout their school years.
We love history. We’re fascinated and enthusiastic about studying and teaching it. As history
educators we wholeheartedly embrace the responsibility and opportunity to guide the next
generation to think more deeply about the past -- to think like historians.
We thank the Teaching American History Teaching Fellows and their students who contributed
to the development of the ideas and practices that follow.
HISTORY DOES MATTER
Why Does History Matter? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Learning History – Making Sense of the Past . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
What Should Students Learn? What Should I Teach? . . . . . . . . . . 9
Resources
Finding Teaching Materials and Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
Professional Development Opportunities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
Documents Cited in this Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
History Does Matter
History is at once interesting, fun, and troubling. Whether we view historically themed
films, read historical fiction, visit historical sites, or watch the History Channel, we
connect with the struggles and successes of those who have gone before us. History
enlivens, informs, and excites both adults and students, and many develop a lifelong love
and passion for the subject. Most significantly, the subject is far more than a collection
of disconnected dates, facts, and events. History is a discipline: a way of thinking
that encourages students to analyze historical evidence, evaluate it, and then
demonstrate their understanding of that evidence. Teaching and learning history
requires repeated practice with these essential elements of the discipline. Students
who have the opportunity to “do” history engage their passion and enthusiasm for the
past while applying the highest levels of critical thinking. Such involved work is well
beyond simple memorization of factual material and prepares young people for the kinds
of sharpened thinking necessary for a successful adult life.
Beyond a body of knowledge and a way of thinking, the discipline of history helps one
make meaning in a chaotic and changing present. The best history courses engage
students in the study of historical artifacts and documents--which are often contradictory
and muddled—from which they produce original work with nuanced and supported
conclusions. As a result of their experience in well-facilitated history courses, such
students tend to think more deeply and carefully about topics that matter, including those
in their present lives. They’re both more hopeful and less likely to be confused by
conflicting evidence in our world of “spin.” Many start to think in ways that the historian
David Hackett Fischer calls “if, then thinking,” suggesting that if we wish to make a
better world that incorporates the best of the past with fewer of its mistakes, then we must
explore what that past world looked like.1
1
David Hackett Fischer, Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought (New York: Harper
Perennial, 1970), p. 315. Fischer’s insight is as valid today as it was then, in 1970.
Finally, studying history matters because nearly everyone in our society uses history. Some
interpret history for their own purposes or to forward a particular agenda. Some use
history as propaganda, hoping to remake the present by remaking popular beliefs about
the past. These uses and abuses of history are not a prerogative of any one political or
ethical persuasion more than another. In a society fueled by instantaneous information and
swirling with historical explanations, students need the power of discernment more than
ever before. History education equips students with powerful tools of thought that will
allow them to evaluate circumstances and make more learned choices. In a rapidly
changing world in which historical ignorance seems to be the rule rather than the
exception, there is no more important discipline for our students to practice, at all levels,
than history.
2
David Lowenthal, The Past is a Foreign Country, (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1985);
Samuel Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts, (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001);
James Loewen, Lies My Teacher Told Me (New York: The New Press, 1995).
Historical evidence comes in two forms: secondary sources and primary sources.
Secondary sources are comprised of information or explanations produced after ve
ve Detecti
the historical event by people who were not involved in the historical event. The Talkati
Secondary source information and explanations are based on primary sources
and other secondary sources. Primary sources are comprised of information or
explanations produced at the time of the event and by people who were involved
in the historical event. Secondary sources provide context, ideas, and information
that are essential to understanding the primary sources. The talkative detective
needs both.
Why talkative? Finding the “right” sources to answer a historical question is more
than a matter of technological competence. In order to find the right sources we
must enter into a “dialogue” with the sources by asking many questions of each
source we encounter: How does it relate to our historical question? Does it
duplicate or contradict other sources? Does it offer new information or
perspectives? Do I have a sufficient number and range of sources to be able to
answer my question - - do my sources include representation of the relevant voices,
interests, issues and/or data?
The conversation moves into a different vein when we turn to evaluating historical
sources. Evaluating historical sources is more than a matter of explaining the words Evaluating the
or pictures or numbers they contain. Why, when, and by whom was the source Evidence
created? How do these factors affect the importance and accuracy of the
information or ideas contained in the source? Does it reinforce, challenge or
deviate from other sources, both secondary and primary? In what ways does it
help to answer the historical question? Does it raise additional questions that need
to be investigated?
In the past, the next source after the textbook might have been an
encyclopedia. Today’s students are more likely to “google it” or look for a
“wiki.” Free-wheeling internet searches yield a hodge-podge of secondary
and primary sources of widely varying importance and quality.
In addition, different people interpret and synthesize the stories told by the sources in
different ways, arriving at different answers to similar questions. This does not mean that all
historical answers are equally valid or correct. First, some answers are factually incorrect.
The Emancipation Proclamation of January 1863, for example, did not free all the slaves.
(The Emancipation Proclamation declared an end to slavery only in areas still in rebellion
– areas that did not recognize the authority of the United States government and, thus, did
not enforce the proclamation.) Second, some answers are not supported by the historical
evidence. In this category we might think of the common misconception that the United
The historical record States entered World War II to end the Holocaust. (The U.S. government did not publicize
includes all reasonably and chose not to take military action to stop or hinder the Holocaust. Most Americans
available primary and learned of the Holocaust only as allied troops entered the death camps at the end of the
secondary sources
war.) Beyond this, however, there are multiple “right” answers and many legitimate areas
of historical disagreement. This brings us to the issue of history as interpretation versus
history as opinion or bias.
Opinion is not history Historical analysis and interpretation must be grounded in a full consideration of the
historical record. The historical record includes all reasonably available secondary and
Opinion is marked by
the absence of primary sources. Yet, even when we examine the same or similar bodies of evidence,
historical evidence intelligent and thoughtful people can reach supportable, but different conclusions. The
key to good history, and the factor that distinguishes historical interpretation from bias or
opinion, is the absolute requirement that historical conclusions must be supportable by
the historical record AND take into consideration sometimes conflicting perspectives and
experiences in that record. Bias slips in when part of the historical evidence is ignored or
Bias is not history its importance is discounted without historical justification. This is not history. Opinion slips
in when statements are made or conclusions reached without evidence to support those
Bias is marked by statements or conclusions. This is not history.
selective use of the
historical record
Historical Categories of Inquiry:
Finding Patterns and Making Sense of the Past
The process of studying the past (asking questions, analyzing sources and drawing
supportable conclusions) is not the only distinguishing mark of the discipline of history.
The past is immense, diverse and complex. Studying and understanding that past could
be quite daunting, particularly if we described our task as recording everything that ever
happened, if we simply asked “What happened?” Fortunately, historians’ curiosity about
that immensely complex past tends to fall into recognizable patterns of inquiry. These
patterns, or what might be called historical categories of inquiry, organize both the
questions we ask of the past and the answers we construct.3
wHat questions do we ask of tHe past? How? wHat? wHere? wHen? wHy? wHo?
wHat questions do we ask of tHe past? How? wHat? wHere? wHen? wHy? wHo?
cause and effect cHange and continuity
•what were the causes of
past events? • what has changed?
ask questions about the causes and consequences of past events. Not surprisingly, our answers to these
questions, our historical interpretations, take the form of stories about causes and consequences.
C We also ask questions about what has changed and what has remained the same over time. Answers to
questions about change and continuity connect events and give meaning to the chronological sequence
of events.
C In some cases we wonder if the change was so dramatic that the topic of study was a historical
turning point. By studying the historical record we are able to reach conclusions that some events or
developments so dramatically changed a society’s ideas, choices and ways of living that some paths
of development could no longer be followed and others became more likely or possible.
C In other cases we look to the past as a guide to our present. We want to know about the particular
course of events that shaped our present. Or, we are using the past to seek guidance in the form of
“lessons of history” that can help us grapple with current problems.
C We find it both necessary and fascinating to examine the ways in which people of different times, places
and conditions made sense of their world. We consider how their experiences, needs and worldviews
affected their actions and the course of events. We try to imagine their world through their eyes.
Recognizing the true nature of the historical discipline has significant implications not only for what we
want our students to learn, but also for how we teach. Instead of overwhelming ourselves and our students
with a plethora of disconnected events, “doing history” allows students to examine the past as a fascinating
narrative of human passion, struggle, triumph and tragedy. We become engaged and help students find
meaning in the past when we use discipline-specific skills of historical inquiry and analysis.
3
The historical categories of inquiry described here and in greater depth throughout this guide encompass the historical thinking skills and historical
habits of mind promoted by the major professional historical associations and K–12 national and state history/social studies associations and
standards. They were developed by condensing into simplified and easily remembered language the combined expertise of the historical profession
as expressed in the published standards of the American Historical Association, the Organization of American Historians, the National Council for
History Education, the National History Standards and the standards for Wisconsin and California.
“The students are doing a worksheet “The students are studying the
on pp. 35–45.” consequences of WWI.”
The Thinking Like a Historian framework supports choices that move beyond commonly
cited explanations (my students like it, I have the materials) to ensure that history education is
both meaningful and engaging.
Historical literacy incorporates the historical process (the disciplinary skills and procedures
that historians use to study the past) and historical categories of inquiry (the conceptual
patterns that historians use to make sense of the past). These two aspects of historical
literacy are embedded in the standards that influence history education today. However,
this is not readily apparent. The text of most history standards combine elements of
both historical process and historical categories of inquiry without distinguishing their
relationship to one another. As a consequence, the distinctive elements and qualities of
Historical Process the historical process and historical analysis are not clear. The Thinking Like a Historian
framework presented here is unique because it purposefully separates and
+ investigates these crucial aspects of historical literacy. By doing so, empowers
both teachers and students to become more historically literate.
ies
Historical Categor
of Inquiry The relationship between these two aspects of historical literacy is graphically represented
on the chart by the outer banner and the inner panel. The outer banner identifies
= the key elements of the historical process. The inner panel identifies the key historical
categories of inquiry.
Historical Literacy
uter Banner:
CO Historical process is the history-specific ways of learning about the past:
How do we know? Historical process is the way we investigate the past.
C Inner Panel: Historical categories of inquiry are ways of organizing inquiry and
analysis of the myriad people, events, and ideas of the past. These categories of
historical inquiry and analysis provide the patterns that help us make sense of the past.
The outer banner and inner panel are in continuous, dynamic interaction with one
another. The outer banner wraps around the entire poster because the historical process of
studying the past informs what we can know about the past. The inner panel is relevant to
all stages of the historical process because we use these categories of inquiry to formulate
the questions we ask of the past and to determine what matters and why it matters as we
construct a historical interpretation.
wHat questions do we ask of tHe past? How? wHat? wHere? wHen? wHy? wHo?
cause and effect cHange and continuity
•what were the causes of
past events? • what has changed?
How can we find out? How do we evaluate tHe evidence?
C ome
S processes and concepts are easier to communicate than others.
For example, most teachers can imagine ways to explore cause or effect with
children of all ages. Some are more difficult and can be misunderstood. For
example, many teachers may wonder whether young children can make
connections between past and present. However….
C Learners at all levels can engage in all stages of the historical process and they
can use all historical categories of inquiry. Naturally 3rd graders will not master
these at the same level or complexity as 10th graders. Teaching historical literacy
requires developmentally appropriate classroom activities and lessons for all
learners. See Section 3 for examples.
wHat questions do we ask of tHe past? How? wHat? wHere? wHen? wHy? wHo?
How do How do
How can we find out? How do we evaluate tHe evidence?
we know? we know?
wHat matters? wHy does it matter?
wHat questions do we ask of tHe past? How? wHat? wHere? wHen? wHy? wHo?
wHat questions do we ask of tHe past? How? wHat? wHere? wHen? wHy? wHo?
cause and effect cHange and continuity
•what were the causes of
Questions past events? • what has changed?
How can we find out? How do we evaluate tHe evidence?
History is a study of the past, it is not the past itself. That study of the past, history, begins
wHat matters? wHy does it matter?
Rubric for teachers [excerpted from Instruction and Assessment Planning Rubric, Resources section]
Use rubrics for self-reflection, evaluating lesson plans, classroom activities, and assessment.
4. Sources must provide information about both historical context and the
topic under study.
Rubric for teachers [excerpted from Instruction and Assessment Planning Rubric, Resources section]
Use rubrics for self-reflection, evaluating lesson plans, classroom activities, and assessment.
Rubric for teachers [excerpted from Instruction and Assessment Planning Rubric, Resources section]
Use rubrics for self-reflection, evaluating lesson plans, classroom activities, and assessment.
Teachers can use these historical categories of inquiry to connect the study of one period,
place or event to other periods, places or events. Pedagogically, this serves two important
purposes:
• First, continuous use of these historical categories provides a way to integrate students’
prior knowledge. In this respect, the framework can serve as the foundation of a
spiraled and sequenced curriculum, even as the “content” topics shift from the American
Revolution to the Civil War or from state history to ancient civilizations.
• S
econd, continuous use of these historical categories builds a common language that
students can use to direct their curiosity and exploration of any historical topic. As students
learn to think about the past according to these disciplinary patterns they are freed from
notions of history as a collection of facts. History becomes a way of thinking about the
past, rather than details to be recalled as history teachers and tests demand.
The questions in the following pages explain and expand on the Chart and
Question Chart below. [Full size charts available in Resources section]
cause and effect change and continuity turning points using the past through their eyes
What were the causes of What has changed? how did past decisions or how does the past help us how did people in the past
past events? actions affect future choices? make sense of the present? view their world?
What has remained the same?
What were the effects? • How did decisions • How is the past similar • How did their worldview
• Who has benefited
or actions narrow or to the present? affect their choices and
• Who or what made from this change?
eliminate choices actions?
change happen? And why?
for people? • How is the past
different from the • What values, skills
• Who supported • Who has not benefited?
• How did decisions or present? and forms of
change? And why?
actions significantly knowledge did people
transform people’s • What can we learn need to succeed?
• Who did not support lives? from the past?
change?
Teachers and students can use these questions as starting points to guide their inquiry and
analysis of historical topics. The generic nature of these questions captures the common
threads that underpin historical knowledge and make it possible to explore similarities,
differences and trends across historical time and place. These questions are purposefully
broad in order to suggest the range of issues that can be explored through each analytical
category.
Teachers and students can use these questions as prompts or starting points for
elaborating more detailed or topic-specific questions. For example, a sub-set of the Cause
and Effect question, “Who or what made change happen?” might be: “How did economic
conditions affect what happened?” or “How did the new law affect world trade?” A
sub-set of the Turning Points question “How did decisions or actions significantly
transform people’s lives?” might be: “How did the arrival of millions of immigrants
between 1880–1920 transform American cities?” or “How did U.S. foreign policy
change as a consequence of World War II?”
We can never know, and certainly we cannot teach, about every person, group or
institution. However, full consideration of key groups and their different ideas, motives,
actions, and experiences must be part of the story if we are to develop an understanding
of the past that reasonably explains what happened and why. This demands attention to
causes and effects that are readily apparent as well as those that are more subtle although
no less significant, to causes and effects connected to the period immediately surrounding
an event as well as those that unfolded over long periods of time, and to causes and effects
that were intended as well as to those that were unintended. The following questions open
pathways to deeper inquiry and analysis: [excerpted from Question Chart, Resources section]
What were the causes of past events? What were the effects?
• Who or what made change happen? • Which effects were intended?
• Who supported change? • Which effects were accidental?
• Who did not support change? • How did events affect people’s lives,
community, and the world?
Rubric for teachers [excerpted from Instruction and Assessment Planning Rubric, Resources section]
Use rubrics for self-reflection, evaluating lesson plans, classroom activities, and assessment.
Certainly there are patterns in human experience that reappear across time and space.
Understanding these patterns is part of, but not the entirety of understanding historical
chronology. More importantly, historians seek to understand how and why things change.
In order to do this successfully, they must consider that different people and groups
participate in and experience the same events in different ways. The following questions
open pathways to deeper inquiry and analysis: [excerpted from Question Chart, Resources
section]
Rubric for teachers [excerpted from Instruction and Assessment Planning Rubric, Resources section]
Use rubrics for self-reflection, evaluating lesson plans, classroom activities, and assessment.
In some cases, people recognize that they are in the midst of a historical turning point. The
dropping of the atomic bombs at the end of World War II is a relatively recent example
of this. (Of course, recognizing that one is living through a historical turning point does
not mean that one can predict the outcomes of that turning point.) In other cases, people
do not recognize that shifting events are remaking their world. Only the rare American in
1776 might have guessed that their War of Independence was the opening battle in an
“age of revolutions” that overthrew the Ancien Regime in France and European empires
in the Americas. The following questions open pathways to deeper inquiry and analysis:
[excerpted from Question Chart, Resources section]
Rubric for teachers [excerpted from Instruction and Assessment Planning Rubric, Resources section]
Use rubrics for self-reflection, evaluating lesson plans, classroom activities, and assessment.
Turning Points • recognizes both major • recognizes major, tradition- • recognizes major, tradi- •d
oes not identify any
historical events (wars, ally-studied historical tionally-studied historical historical changes or event
New set of parameters or industrial revolution) AND events as “turning points” events as “turning points” as a “turning point” which
new path of social, political less obvious events (migra- (wars, industrial revolution, (wars, industrial revolu- set a new course or new
or economic development tion and demography, economic depression) tion, economic depression) set of parameters
For example: social or cultural changes, •e xplains why or how •d oes not explain why
• end of slavery technological or medical these events established a or how these events
• rise of waged labor changes) as “turning new set of parameters or established a new set of
• rise of U.S. as a global points” established a different path parameters or established
power • explains why or how these of historical development a different path of
• emergence of Victorian developments established historical development
norms of womanhood a new set of parameters or
and manhood established a different path
of historical development
At the same time, using the past responsibly is fraught with enormous challenges. Since
history does not repeat itself, no past event is a perfect guide to later events or future
actions. Using the past responsibly requires finding the useable past. In order to find
the useable past we must be able to discriminate between those events and aspects of the
past that are relevant to and those that are not relevant to the event under study.
Some historical similarities are comparable, others are not. For example, comparing
divorce rates in 1890 to those in 1990 would lead to false conclusions about the stability
of the American nuclear family. Why? The significant causes of family instability in 1890
were death and desertion, not divorce. Although many Americans opposed U.S.
involvement in both the Philippine-American War and World War I, the former is more
relevant if one is trying to understand public opposition to the American War in Vietnam.
Why? Guerilla warfare and charges of imperial intent fueled popular discontent with both
of these wars. The following questions open pathways to deeper inquiry and analysis:
[excerpted from Question Chart, Resources section]
Rubric for teachers [excerpted from Instruction and Assessment Planning Rubric, Resources section]
Use rubrics for self-reflection, evaluating lesson plans, classroom activities, and assessment.
Using the Past • distinguishes elements of, • traces developmental • recognizes similarities •m
akes no connections be-
or patterns in, past events relationship, over time and and/or differences tween past events or trends
Historians only use parts or periods that are similar space, between past between past events and and contemporary life
of the past. Need to to AND that are different events or patterns and contemporary issues,
discriminate between which from a contemporary contemporary events or but makes simple, linear
parts of past events are situation patterns; connections that jump
comparable and which are • using knowledge of that • recognizes factors that over decades/centuries of
not by considering: past event or period draws have contributed to time without addressing
• What are the parallels or supportable conclusions changes over time in the impact of intervening
similarities? about the contemporary parallel event or pattern developments
• What is different? situation
• All similarities are not
“useable” for comparative
purposes
This can also be the most misunderstood aspect of historical study. Exploring these and
many other questions can deepen historical understanding only if we remember
that we are observers of the past, not actors in the past. We can never be an
African-American woman watching her children dragged away by slave traders. We can
never be an Italian boy preparing to leave the only home he knows to join his father in a
far away place called New York. We have a different set of beliefs, expectations, desires,
fears, opportunities and experiences than they did. What is logical or rational to us may
have been impossible, inconceivable, or foolhardy in their world – and vice versa. Ignoring
this leads to errors of “presentism.”
What we can do is to “listen” to the voices of the past without preconceptions. We must let
people of the past begin and end their own sentences. In order to understand why people
thought and acted in the way they did in the past we need to see the world as they saw it.
We need to see their world through their eyes. The following questions open pathways to
deeper inquiry and analysis: [excerpted from Question Chart, Resources section]
Rubric for teachers [excerpted from Instruction and Assessment Planning Rubric, Resources section]
Use rubrics for self-reflection, evaluating lesson plans, classroom activities, and assessment.
Through their •d
raws interpretive • recognizes that historical • recognizes that people’s •u
ses contemporary values
eyes connections between the actors brought multiple lives in the past differed and knowledge [early 21st
ways in which different perspectives to the same in significant way from century] to explain or
• Seek to understand the groups of historical actors event, reflecting differences contemporary, 21st make sense of past actions
world view of historical understood “their present” in class, gender, race/ century, life; inc. gender or decisions
actors and the ways this (as in level 3) and the ethnicity, region, religion, roles, class divisions,
affected their choices and ways they responded to age, education, past personal and national
actions. the problems, opportuni- experiences goals, racial/ethnic
• Avoid presentism (evalu- ties and choices that •d oes not necessarily attitudes, material
ating the past according confronted them connect these perspectives standards of life
to present-day beliefs and to significant historical •m ay connect this to
actions) developments personal goals or actions
The study of history always begins with questions. Good history teaching also begins
with questions.
Connecting what we do in the classroom on a day-to-day basis to larger lesson, unit and
curriculum goals can be a challenge in any subject area. This section offers ideas and
examples of ways you can use the Thinking Like a Historian framework to make
those connections and build your students’ historical literacy.
Little Picture The Historical Themes for this Course will be:
Lesson Content:
Lesson Process:
Lesson Application:
What are the historically significant themes? What are the larger stories that cross
time and space? Historians and teachers of history may arrive at different answers
When historians use
to these questions. As teachers we need to choose historical themes that have
scope and sequence across the school year and from year to year. Themes are
the term “time” they
historically significant stories that students can follow or pick up at multiple
mean the passage of
times during a school year and as they move from class to class. Themes chronological time as
are the building blocks for a history scope and sequence that can draw on measured by days,
student learning in prior units or classes and extend student learning for later months, years, centu-
units or classes. ries, millennia. When
historians use the term
Choosing themes should be the first step in curriculum planning. For those familiar “space” they mean
with the process of Backward Design, this is the history-specific equivalent of geographical place, as
choosing overarching understandings.1 defined by village, city,
countryside, region,
nation, empire.
1
Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe, Understanding by Design, (Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2005).
Lesson Application:
C uilding a History Curriculum, describes up to a dozen central themes for U.S., West-
B
ern and World History. The eight themes for U.S. history, for example, include: (1) The
evolution of American political democracy, its ideas, institution, and practices…; (2) The
development of the American economy; geographic and other forces at work; the role
of the frontier and agriculture; the impact of technological change and urbanization…;
(3) The gathering of people and cultures from many countries, and the several religious
traditions….; (4) The changing role of the United States in the outside world; relations
between domestic affairs and foreign policy…3
C istory Now, an on-line publication of the Gilder Lehrman Institute, also highlights a
H
specific historical topic in each issue. Articles explain historical themes related to that
topic as well as connections between those topical and larger historical themes.6
C [Additional resources listed in Resource section]
2
National Center for History in the Schools, Lessons from History: Essential Understandings and Historical Perspectives Students Should Acquire, (Los
Angeles: National Center for History in the Schools, 1992), pp. 28–40. This companion volume to the National Standards in History is a treasure trove
of ideas, information and explanations about topics and themes for both U.S. and World History.
3
National Council for History Education, Building a History Curriculum: Guidelines for Teaching History in Schools, (Westlake, Ohio: National Center for
History Education, 2003), pp. 12–15.
4
Titles for the teaching pamphlets as well as additional sources on teaching history can be found in the on-line publications catalog for the American
Historical Association. http://www.historians.org/pubs/overview.cfm [accessed 8/15/07]
5
Organization of American Historians, Magazine of History. Published bi-monthly. Subscription information available at:
http://www.oah.org/pubs/magazine/ [accessed 8/15/07]
6
Gilder Lehrman Institute, History Now. Published quarterly. Accessible on-line at: http://www.historynow.org/past.html [accessed 8/15/07]
Lesson Plan: When I plan the curriculum for fourth grade social studies I need to
Key Understandings consider all the social studies content strands pertaining to Wisconsin’s
Little Picture
geography, history, economy, culture, and government. I give focus and
direction to this broad spectrum of content by putting history at the
center.
I develop course themes for fourth grade social studies directly from
TLH: What matters? and Why does it matter? I address this issue of
significance by developing overarching questions about the past that
will help my students make sense of the present (using the past). These
thematic questions purposefully incorporate multiple categories of
historical inquiry: When did people come? Why did they stay? Why
did they leave? (cause and effect) What did the people of the past do to
survive? (through their eyes) What has changed? What has remained
the same? How have people’s attitudes changed over time? (change and
tor y
tate His continuity)
TOPIC: S
:
l Themes
Historica
e people When did people come here? Why did they stay? Why did they leave?
T h is la nd’s nativ f years
•
iv e d th o usands o These questions allow me and my students to make connections
surv s
l resource
on natura , between the ancient people who migrated here during the last Ice
explorers
uropean
• Early E immigrants Age, the European explorers thousands of years later, immigrant
traders & hange
influence
dc settlers during the 1800s coupled with the forced relocation of
ted the Native peoples, and urban migration during the Industrial
ment crea
• Govern isconsin and
state of W s to relocate Revolution. Seeking answers to these big questions helps my
tive
forced na students develop a skeletal understanding of who came to this land
s tied
ic change
• Econom resources & before us. Using the past, students can analyze the factors that
l
to natura nces
o lo g ical adva brought their own ancestors to this place. Turning points such as
techn
impacted the Black Hawk War and the Trail of Tears are events that illustrate
a ti o n a l conflicts
• N
Wisconsi
n how others were forced out of their homelands, and compelled to
create new communities and means of survival.
How have Wisconsin people’s attitudes changed over time? Striving to understand
how the people of the past perceived the world around them requires an emotional
detachment on the part of historians. To think like historians, my students learn to
refrain from using contemporary values to judge historical attitudes in an effort to
better understand the past. They need to avoid presentism. We look at the role of
government in the shaping of our state and note that one reason the first state
constitution was voted down in 1846 was because it gave women the right to vote.
Two years later, the second state constitution was ratified without that provision.
While such an attitude seems repugnant today, it does help to explain why women
have had and continue to have less voice in our government than men.
TOPIC: Moder
n
• Modern United States History: High School United States
History
Historical Them
es
• The growth of
Through much of my teaching career, and like many history teachers democracy
participatory
who wrestle with how to organize a great amount of content into a • The role of w
omen
limited time, I carefully outlined my courses into general time • Dissent and
dissenters in
periods, and then into units connected to historically significant American life
events. The unit titles described the big ideas connected to these • Land use an
d the significan
events. However, the course organization was based primarily on of the environm ce
ent
moving from one time period to another. • Religion in Am
erican Histor y
• The role of et
hnic and
As I reviewed my units and events using the framework, I minority groups
realized that what I taught during the first half of the course was • Work and th
e role of labor
not necessarily informing and supporting what I taught during
the second half. On reflection, I determined that time periods,
which are useful organizers for the structure of a history course, are
Unit Plan: not, by themselves, historically meaningful or significant. Further,
Driving Questions major events within each time period can be studied in many ways. As
a consequence, historically significant connections between events in
different time periods may not be as self-evident to students as they are
to teachers. I needed to explore ways to tie together what
Lesson Plan: matters over time for my students.
Key Understandings
Little Picture
I began to look for the overarching themes that connected my units
across major time periods. I needed to identify historically significant
concepts, problems and types of events that appeared repeatedly across
time periods. I asked myself:
Understanding how Americans think about land, use it, and fight over
it is central to understanding our nation. Land use patterns for much
of the American colonial period through the late nineteenth century
reveal a desire to shape the land for agricultural purposes or for
The same is true of the historical theme of work and the role of labor. This is a
central characteristic of our national history so common that it often goes
unseen in many history courses. For example, across units of American history I
encourage students to use primary sources to explore how workers have viewed
their work conditions, and how working people have responded, individually and
collectively, to challenges posed by their work. This approach encourages students
to see the past through their eyes, and helps them to use the past to understand how
today’s working conditions are shaped by those who came before.
It is important to choose themes that make sense to you, that matter historically, that
are tied to national, state and local history standards, and that mesh with available
materials and resources in your school setting. Keep them fresh and change them
over time as your own historical knowledge grows. In the end, historical themes are
vitally important because they give your course a coherent shape that students can
recognize and use.
State standards and district curricula identify far more information than students will
understand and retain in any given year of study. Deciding which information is essential
and which may be covered more lightly or not at all can be difficult. The framework
enables a teacher to narrow the instructional focus and determine an order of importance
in choosing what to teach.
History begins with questions. A history unit begins with the development of driving
questions. Driving questions serve as the bridge between the big picture historical themes
identified for the course and the key understandings and learning goals for an individual
lesson. One can begin by using the historical categories of inquiry and the historical
themes for the course to identify the most significant aspects of the unit topic.
• Which
events, people or ideas connected to this unit topic are most directly connected to
the historical themes for the course?
•S
ee Getting Started: Finding Historical Themes, above, and the Resource section
for references to sources that can help you do this.
•A
re those connections best demonstrated or historically significant because they help one
understand (one or more of the following):
•C
ause and effect?
•C
hange and continuity?
• T urning points?
•U
sing the past?
• T hrough their eyes?
Use your answers to these questions to decide what you will teach.
•D
evelop a limited number of declarative statements about what you want students
to understand by the end of the unit. “By the end of this unit students should
understand ________”
• T ransform those declarative statements into questions. These become the driving
questions for the unit. The driving questions should guide both teaching and student
learning. Students should be able to answer the driving questions at the end of the unit.
Lesson Content:
Lesson Process:
Lesson Application:
Lesson Plan: As I plan units for my middle school classes I need to pay attention to
Key Understandings state standards and to all five strands of social studies (geography,
Little Picture
history, political science, economics and behavioral sciences).
Another course theme integrates the social studies strands by focusing on the ways
that the built environment connects past and present. Course theme: Archeological
remains and architectural structures connect the people who lived in the past with
the people who live in the present. Combining this with the historical categories of
change and continuity and using the past can lead to an understanding of why our
city looks the way it does today. I developed a driving question that would direct my
students to this understanding: How does identifying historical architecture of the
past help us make sense of our community today?
Although I didn’t have the answers to these driving questions when I began planning
this unit, the course themes and driving questions helped me locate sources quite
easily. The local library had information about historic buildings in our city. I
obtained a glossary of architectural styles from the state historical society. I used
Lessons within a unit of study must have a clear instructional purpose. Lessons must focus
on a key understanding as defined by the driving questions. In order to plan an effective
history lesson a teacher needs to keep this completed statement in mind:
“By the end of this lesson I want my students to understand ____________.”
Content Content
Content is what a student should Determined by thoughtfully selected
know, understand, and be able to historical themes and driving questions
do as a result of the lesson. Include all of the following: facts, ideas,
concepts, skills and categories of inquiry
Make it possible for students to achieve a level
3 or 4 understanding on the rubric in at
least one historical category of inquiry [See
Rubrics in Sections 2 & 4]
Process Process
Process is the instructional strategies Models the historical process (questions,
designed to help the student under- evidence, interpretation)
stand the content. Engages students in inquiry and investigation
of a historical “problem” (the historical
problem is defined by the driving questions
and key understandings)
Uses multiple sources and different types of
sources (including combinations of primary
and secondary sources)
Provides opportunities for students to use
content to construct informed answers to the
driving questions.
Application Application
Application is how the student Guides student to conclusions that include
demonstrates what he/she knows, historical interpretation and significance
understands, and is able to do. Makes it possible to determine student’s
proficiency at one or more skills and
categories of inquiry
Lesson Content:
Lesson Process:
Lesson Application:
TM [Excerpted from Curriculum Planning for History Worksheet, Resources section] UWW, WHS, CESA 2 - 2007
Lesson Plan:
Key Understandings I want my fourth grade students to think like historians during each
Little Picture social studies lesson on state history. All my lessons on state history are
grounded in two basic historical questions: What has changed? How does
the past help us make sense of the present?
The next step in the lesson, and in doing history, is to find information that will help
to answer these questions. I provide a variety of historical sources and make sure that
students understand that these are different types of sources and present different
perspectives. I give students an opportunity to “digest” what they learn from each
source through short writing assignments.
• Oral history primary source visit by an area farmer talks about the changes he’s
experienced in his 40 years of farming.
• Students write a letter to the farmer. In addition to personal comments
they must tell the farmer what they learned from his presentation.
7
Wisconsin Agriculture Association, This Business Called Agriculture, (Wisconsin, 2007)
At this point we return to our initial set of questions. Students use the
information and insights from their study of each source to answer that
initial set of questions. The process of thinking like historians gives them a
better understanding of how Wisconsin shifted from agriculture to
manufacturing.
Many students believe that history is boring, full of facts, dates and rote memorization.
ged Thinking Like a Historian changes that notion. Rather than teaching students about
Students enga
in construc ti ng history, engages students in doing history. It supports creative teaching that
history are “hooks” students and draws them into the subject. When students are engaged in
ged in constructing history they become engaged in learning history. They want to learn more,
students enga
st or y. rather than do the minimum needed to get by. When students are participants in their
learning hi
own learning, they are engaged and the material they are learning becomes much more
meaningful to them.
A meaningful lesson is a lesson from which students learn in the short term AND
remember that knowledge in the long term. How do we know if a lesson is engaging
and meaningful to students? How can we distinguish between an engaging lesson that is
meaningful and one that is just “fun”? The key to making history engaging and meaningful
at the same time is to draw students into what they are studying and give them the skills to
use this newfound knowledge. If students feel they are a part of the process they are more
likely to take a vested interest in the outcome. This kind of lesson is:
• Relevant to Students
Imagine learning about people born thousands of years before you, in a place you
have never heard of, doing things that you don’t care about. Would you be interested?
If a history lesson can be made relevant to students, they are much more apt to become
engaged in finding out more about the topic. We need to relate historical events to
things that matter in our students’ lives. This does not mean pretending that the past was
exactly like the present or vice versa. Instead, teachers can make the past relevant, and
model critical thinking by
• h
ighlighting big picture commonalities between past and present
(international and domestic crises can lead to war, new technologies
change relations between family and friends, societies make laws
to achieve a vision of order and stability, belief systems affect
individual and society-wide behaviors)
• d
rawing connections between causes or consequences of a historical
event and students’ present day lives (roots of present day customs
and beliefs, historic origins of everyday items, historical turning points
that contributed to the opportunities or problems current in students’ lives)
• introducing a historical topic in terms of a problem, challenge
or incomplete story to be investigated (partial or conflicting evidence
about the causes or consequences of an event, stories about the
actions or experiences of a real person)
Create lessons that ask students to participate in meaningful, relevant history. Lessons should
lead to knowledge that students will be able to use in and out of the classroom. Avoid
activities that use gimmicks simply to make history more “fun” for a day.
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the
terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you
provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work
in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in
the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or
expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or
a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original
“Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must
include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in
paragraph 1.E.1.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive
from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.