Introduction To CONTROLLING
Introduction To CONTROLLING
(See
Exhibit 18-2.) The control process assumes that
Management by Robbins
performance standards already exist, and they do.
1.1. Explain the nature and importance of They’re the specific goals created during the
control. planning process.
CONTROLLING
It’s the process of monitoring, comparing,
and correcting work performance. All managers
should control even if their units are performing as
planned because they can’t really know that unless
they’ve evaluated what activities have been done
and compared actual performance against the
desired standard.
Effective controls ensure that activities are
STEP I. MEASURING ACTUAL PERFORMANCE
completed in ways that lead to the attainment of
goals. Whether controls are effective, then, is To determine actual performance, a
determined by how well they help employees and manager must first get information about it.
managers achieve their goals. Thus, the first step in control is measuring.
Why is control so important? HOW WE MEASURE. Four approaches
used by managers to measure and report
Control is important, therefore, because it’s actual performance are personal
the only way that managers know whether observations, statistical reports, oral reports,
organizational goals are being met and if not, the and written reports. Exhibit 18-3 summarizes
reasons why. The value of the control function can the advantages and drawbacks of each
be seen in three specific areas: planning, approach. Most managers use a
empowering employees, and protecting the combination of these approaches
workplace.
The second reason controlling is important is
because of employee empowerment.
The final reason that managers control is to
protect the organization and its assets
PLANNING CONTROLLING LINK
The comparing step determines the BASIC CORRECTIVE ACTION - looks at how and
variation between actual performance why performance deviated before correcting the
and the standard. Although some variation source of deviation
in performance can be expected in all REVISE THE STANDARD
activities, it’s critical to determine an
acceptable range of variation. It’s possible that the variance was a result of
Accept or reject the product or outcome. an unrealistic standard—too low or too high a goal.
Managers must determine why standards In that situation, the standard needs the corrective
were not met. action, not the performance. If performance
Involves determining whether more control consistently exceeds the goal, then a manager
is necessary or if the standard should be should look at whether the goal is too easy and
changed needs to be raised. On the other hand, managers
must be cautious about revising a standard
Control Process downward. It’s natural to blame the goal when an
employee or a team falls short. For instance,
A three-step process of measuring actual
performance, comparing actual performance against students who get a low score on a test often attack
the grade cutoff standards as too high. Rather than
accept the fact that their performance was What is Organizational Performance?
inadequate, they will argue that the standards are
Performance is the end result of an activity.
unreasonable. Likewise, salespeople who don’t
meet their monthly quota often want to blame what Organizational Performance - the
they think is an unrealistic quota. The point is that accumulated results of all the organization’s work
when performance isn’t up to par, don’t immediately activities. It’s a multifaceted concept, but managers
blame the goal or standard. If you believe the need to understand the factors that contribute to
standard is realistic, fair, and achievable, tell organizational performance. After all, it’s unlikely
employees that you expect future work to improve, that they want (or intend) to manage their way to
and then take the necessary corrective action to help mediocre performance. They want their
make that happen. organizations, work units, or work groups to achieve
high levels of performance
1. Liquidity Ratios
2. Leverage Ratios Total asset Turnover
3. Activity Ratios
4. Profitability Ratios The fewer assets used to achieve a given
level of sales the more efficiently.
LIQUIDITY RATIOS
Liquidity ratios measure an organization’s
ability to meet its current debt obligations.
PROFITABILITY RATIOS
Current Ratio
Profitability ratios measure how efficiently
Test the organization’s ability to meet short- and effectively the company is using its assets to
term obligations generate profits
Profit Margin on Sales
Identifies the profits that are being generated
Acid Test
Test liquidity more accurately when
inventories turn over slowly or are difficult to sell Return investement
Measures the efficiency of assets to
generate profits.
LEVERAGE RATIOS