Project Chapter 4
Project Chapter 4
CHAPTER FOUR
MARKET/COMMERCIAL ANALYSIS OF PROJECT /FEASIBILITY STUDIES/
A feasibility study is an in depth investigation of the factors that affect the future success of a project or the
process of project preparation and analysis. The main areas of project feasibility study are;
• Commercial/market
• Technical
• Institutional & organizational
• Financial
• Economic
• Social soundness and
• Environmental
The project feasibility study generally involves two steps namely:
• Pre- feasibility study and
• Feasibility study
1. Pre-feasibility study
Pre-feasibility study is an initial assessment of key risks involved in the project, which if they occurred
could prevent the achievement of project objective. Pre-feasibility study is expected to identify broad areas
of risks such as Technical, social, environmental, institutional, financial, economic, political etc.
Prefeasibility study is undertaken if any one of the following is true.
a. When there is serious lack of information on the development problem,
b. When the project proposal is poorly defined
Some of the main components that should be examined during the pre-feasibility study include:
• Availability of adequate market
• Project growth potential
• Investment costs, operational cost and distribution costs
• Demand and supply sectors and
• Social and environmental considerations
A. Availability of adequate market
The subjective consideration of the market potential at the pre-feasibility stage includes
Making judgment on the number of potential customers
Needs of the customers
Strength of the competitors
Availability and access to sales and distribution network and export possibilities.
B. Project growth potential
The growth potential is examined by looking at a number of indicators. Some of the indicators include
Projected increase in the number of customers
Increase in the rate of acceptance of the products
the general economic, social and political trends which might influence the growth potential of the
project.
C. Investment costs, operational costs and distribution costs
Purchase and transportation costs of raw material and finished products
labor costs, production costs
However in most practical situation it is not uncommon to find a situation where only a few projects are
sufficiently analyzed, carefully prepared and optimally selected. This happens because of two major
reasons;
Lack of skilled manpower to carry out a detail analysis and
Unwillingness of the entity undertaking the project to spend money on this process.
Hence many projects are implemented without any extensive feasibility studies. In the obscene of detailed
feasibility studies, project implementing agencies usually use non- numeric project selection models.
They are;
1. The sacred cow model
In this model, a project is usually suggested by a senior and powerful individual in an organization and the
idea is then passed to the officers below. In many cases, other officers are required to assist the boss to
achieve what he/she wants. Although such projects may not pass through vigorous analysis, the boss may
persist until he/she is convinced that it can no longer work. Many projects in the public sector of
developing countries have been initiated using this approach. Usually, these projects are initiated by
powerful politicians such as ministers with the aim to give their home areas the so called „accelerated
development‟.
2. Operating necessity model
In this project selection model, projects are initiated because they are required to keep a system in the
operation. These are threatening situations such as floods which will simply call for projects to be started
without much evaluation. Funding of projects initiated in this manner is usually done without making
though and meticulous analysis that goes with projects preparation and identification.
3. Competitive necessity model
Projects are usually initiated and given a lot of support if they will help an organization maintain a
competitive edge over other organizations. Such projects are considered to be of survival importance to an
organization and may not necessarily be required to go through careful numerical analysis.
4. Product line extension model
Project formulators or promoters must bear in mind the key word „appropriate‟ in formulating a project.
The project should have to be designed analyzed interms of its appropriateness and relevance with regard
to the project‟s objective. In line with this perspective, the project objective is the key to technical
analysis.
The broad purpose of technical analysis is (a) to ensure that the project is technically feasible in the sense
that the inputs required to set up the project are available, and (b) to facilitate the most optimal formulation
of the project in terms of technology, size, location, and so on. The following are basic issues pertaining to
technical analysis using common sense and economic logic.
Manufacturing process /technology
Technical arrangements
Materials and Inputs
Plan capacity
Location and site
Structures and civil works
Environmental aspects
A. Manufacturing Process Technology
In manufacturing a product or service often two or more alternative technologies are available. For
instance, cement can be made either by the dry process or the wet process. Similarly, a soap can be
manufactured by the semi – boiled process or the fully – boiled process.
o Technology Choice
Selection of appropriate technology and know–how is a critical element in any feasibility study. Such
selection should be based on a detailed consideration and evaluation of technological alternatives and the
selection of the most suitable alternative in relation to the project to investment strategy chosen and to
socio – economic and ecological considerations. Appropriate technology choice is directly related to the
conditions of application in particular situations. What may be appropriate in industrialized economies
with high labor costs may not necessarily be the optimum for low – age developing countries, with severe
constraints on infrastructure and availability of inputs. On the other hand, a plant in a developing country
that produces primarily for export to industrialized countries may need to utilize the latest automated and
capital – intensive production processes in order to compete in such markets. Competitive production
capability in intended markets is one of the most crucial factors for technology choice, and the related plant
capacity can be a major determinant of such capability. Generally, technology choice must be directly
related to market, resource and environmental conditions and the corporate strategies recommended for a
particular project.
Principal Inputs: The chosen technology, in some cases, may be influenced by the raw materials available
– for instance, the quality of limestone determines whether the wet or dry process should be used for a
cement plant.
Investment Outlay and Production Cost. The effect of alternative technologies on investment outlay and
production cost over a period of time should be carefully assessed.
Use by Other Units: The technology adopted must be proven by successful use by other units.
Product Mix: The chosen technology must be judged in terms of the total product – mix generated by it,
including saleable by – products.
Latest Developments: The technology adopted must be based on the latest developments in order to ensure
that the likelihood of technological obsolescence in the near future, at least, is minimized.
Ease of Absorption: The ease with which a particular technology can be absorbed can influence the choice
of technology.
o Appropriateness of Technology
Appropriateness of technology refers to the methods of production which are suitable to local economic,
social, and cultural conditions. Nowadays, advocates of appropriate technology urge that the technology
should be evaluated in terms of the following points:
Whether the technology utilizes local raw materials?
Whether the technology utilizes local manpower?
Whether the goods and services produced cater to the basic needs?
Whether the technology protects ecological balance?
Whether the technology is harmonious with social and cultural conditions?
B. Technical Arrangements
To obtain the technical know–how needed for the proposed manufacturing process, suitable arrangements
must be made. When collaboration is sought, among other things, the following aspects of the arrangement
must be worked out in detail:
The nature of support to be provided by the collaborators during the designing of the project,
selections and procurement of equipment, installation and erection of the plant, operation and
maintenance of the plant, and training of the project personnel.
Process and performance guarantees interms of plant capacity, product quality and consumption of
raw materials and utilities.
There is a close relationship between the definition of input requirements and other aspects of project
formulation, such as the definition of plant capacity, location and selection of technology and equipment,
as these inevitably interact with one another.
Material inputs and utilities may be classified into four broad categories: (i) Raw materials, (ii) Processed
industrial materials and components, (iii) Auxiliary materials and factory supplies, and (iv) Utilities.
o Raw Materials
Raw materials (processed and/or semi – processed) may be classified into four types; (i) Agricultural
products, (ii) Mineral products, (iii) Livestock and forest products, and (iv) Marine products.
Agricultural products:
If the basic raw material is agricultural products, its quality, present and potential quantities should be
identified. In food processing industry, only the marketable surpluses of agricultural products should be
viewed as basic raw materials, after meeting the consumption and sowing requirements. If the project
requires large quantities the production of agricultural products should be increased by extending area of
cultivation (sugar cane) or adding one more crop to estimate availability, the data on the past crop to be
collected and also to study their distribution by market segment. Storage and transportation costs to be
considered. Future cultivation studies should be based under varied conditions and the quality and
suitability to be tested.
Livestock and forest product:
Specific surveys are conducted for viability of an industrial project to have a more dependable and precise
data base. To assess the potentials of availability, yield and cost of collection, other consideration are,
ecological factors, national policies, and bilateral and multilateral agreements, fishing quotas by quantity
related licenses and the danger of over fishing.
Mineral products:
Information about metallic, non-metallic and clays and their exploitable deposits, proven reserves,
viability, open cost or underground mining, location, size, depth, quality of deposits, impurities etc, should
be gathered. Deposit from different location may differ in chemical properties. Analysis and test results of
ores and mineral should be included in project reports.
Specification of requirements:
All requirements of material and supplies should be identified and specified in the study considering all
socio-economic, commercial, financial and technical factors. Project characteristics and envisaged
technology determines the requirement of materials and supplies. Flow sheets for materials and other
inputs indicating quantitative flows should be prepared. The quality of various inputs and their quantities
are estimated based on the user demand and market expectations about the products of the project. The
nominal and feasible plant capacity will have to be defined on the basis of varying supply conditions,
number of shifts and products, skill of the labor force and marketing strategies. To identify the
characteristics of materials and inputs, the analysis should cover physical properties, mechanical properties,
chemical properties and electrical and magnetic properties.
Availability and supply:
The source of materials availability, their users and price of inputs are to be analyzed. The
interdependencies between project, material and input requirements and supply of these items should be
considered. The machinery, equipment, production process, capacity etc. may have to be revised if inputs
with the specified characteristics and quantities are not available. Data regarding locations of availability,
area of supply, whether concentrated or dispersed, transportability, transport costs and alternate usage of
such materials need to be collected. If the material has to be imported, the implication of such imports
should be assessed. There may be lack of knowledge of alternative external source of inputs. The
implications of domestic production of materials that were being imported should be analyzed. If
alternative materials are used, the discussion should also include an assessment of the environmental
impact of each material.
Nominal Maximum Capacity (NMC) is the technically feasible capacity, which frequently corresponds to
the installed capacity as guaranteed by the supplier of the plant. A higher capacity – nominal maximum
capacity – may be achieved, but this would entail overtime, excessive consumption of factory supplies,
utilities, spare parts and wear – and tear parts, as well as disproportionate production cost increases.
Generally, the choice of location is influenced by a variety of considerations: proximity to raw materials
and markets, availability of infrastructure, labor situation, governmental policies, and other factors.
Proximity to Raw Materials and Markets
Proximity to the sources of raw materials and nearness to the market for the final products are an important
considerations for location. In light of a basic location model, optional location is one where the total cost
(raw material transportation cost plus production cost plus distribution cost for the final product) is
minimized. Practically, it means that:
i) a resource – based project like a cement plant or a steel mill should be located close to the source of the
basic material (for example, limestone in the case of a cement plant and iron ore in the case of a steel plant;
(ii) a project based on imported material may be located near a port; and (iii) a project manufacturing a
perishable product should be close to the centre of consumption.
A great many industrial products, however, are not affected by any one particular factor. Petroleum
products and petrochemicals, for example, can be located at source, near consumption centers or even at
some intermediate point. A wide range of consumer goods and other industries can be located at various
distances from materials and markets without unduly distorting project economics.
Availability of Infrastructure
In a feasibility study, availability of power, transportation, water, and communications should be carefully
assessed before a location decision is made.
Inadequate supply of power or its high unit cost in a particular area can constitute a major constraint for a
project or for a particular technological process such as electrical smelting. The project has to provide its
own power source, where the location of resource – based project can not be changed. Power requirements
can be defined in relation to plant capacity, and the supply and cost at various locations should be studied.
In assessing power supply, the following should be looked into: the amount of power available, the stability
of the power supply, the structure of the power tariff, and the investment required by the project for a tie –
up in the network of the power supplying agency.
Transportation facilities (by rail, road, air, or water) may be available for the inflow of various inputs and
for the marketing of outputs. The availability, reliability, and cost of transportation for various alternative
locations should be assessed.
Water requirement for the project can be assessed based on the given plant capacity and technology. Once
the required quantity is estimated, the amount to be drawn from the public utility system and the amount to
be provided by the project from surface or sub – surface sources may be determined. Moreover, the
following factors may be examined i.e. its relative costs, relative dependability, and relative qualities.
In addition to power, transport, and water, the project should have good communication facilities, including
telex telephone, and internet should also be ascertained for alternative locations.
Generally, externalities or side effects may bound to create environmental conflicts that might ultimately
lead to compensation claims, substantial costs for purification and equipment, and possibly to the extent of
the closure of the plant.
The general objective of environmental impact assessment in project analysis is to ensure whether the
development projects are environmentally sound. This implies that the effects of the project over its
estimated life do not unacceptably degrade the environment, and that no residual effects are anticipated that
would contribute to long – term environmental deterioration. It is well known that the immediate and long
– term health and welfare of people are linked to their natural, cultural and socio – economic environment.
Because of this reason, and to promote the objective of incorporating the ideas and aspirations of the
End