Is Radio The Most Effective Tool For Development?
Is Radio The Most Effective Tool For Development?
For the community of Nankumba the problem was not necessarily lack of radio.Infact
the area has a very clear Short Wave and FM reception from the national broadcaster,
Malawi Broadcasting Corporation (MBC).They even pick signals from Mozambican
radio across the border. This is to say, if radio was all powerful, why is it that for all
these years since the 60’s when the MBC was launched; women of Nankumba were
still not fully integrated into the development process? Bella Mody (1991) while
critiquing Daniel Lerner’s,1958 version of the western media use for mass media for
modernisation and Wilbur Schramms, 1964 all powerful idealisation of the role of
mass media in development asks, “Do increases in channel availability lead to
increases in incomes, literacy…?”(p.22) or better still, as Fr Francis Lucas (1999) puts
it, “access to media is (only) access to information. But access to the power of media
is access to life” It is against such conceptions that mass media (radio) are scaled. In
other words the extent to which they influencing change or in the language of the
UNDP, human development. Fr. Francis, like many other scholars, argues that
community radio is for and of the people. People should feel: the medium is being
used for their welfare, they are not mere receivers of information, the medium is
within their reach and at their disposal and that there is support beyond sound. In
other words, power rests with the community to decide what they want with their
radio at any given moment. Perhaps one striking observation by Fr. Lucas, which is
often told of communication campaigns, is that it is not enough, say, to advise farmers
to apply fertilizer when they can’t even afford 5kg of the chemical. However, for the
women of Nankumba their programmes have had some positive results from some
nearby NGOs who have helped them to form cooperatives where they are being given
loans.Infact it has not only become a radio but a development Community Based
Organisation (CBO).
A comparison with the national broadcaster draws a number of parallels. Like a
number of studies, scholary opinion and actual project experiences in radio for
development have indicated (Malawi-Unesco, 1998; Mody, 1991) active
participation of the target audiences in the planning, designing and implementation of
development communication messages and campaigns is of prime importance than
the channel itself.
While the national radio does have rural development targeted programmes, these are
mainly initiated and produced by the professionals. Situations have arisen when these
programmes have failed to be aired on their scheduled time possibly due to
unforeseen “national priorities” like broadcasts of sponsored football matches and
presidential speeches. Granted that they are targeted, but the targets are not defined
geographically nor do they control the content as editorial decision rests with the
professionals. For Dzimwe community radio the very fact that the programmes reflect
their felt needs and every day lifestyles, and that they are actually in control of
production, is a complete departure from the conventional models of broadcasting.
Infact as Mercado (1992), argues in his definition of development communication,
radio campaigns should be,
This is reflected in what goes on at Nankumba. “When they hear their fellow villagers
advising against unhygienic practices like not using bathe shelters and latrines, they
easily relate this and feel obliged to change,” Mamwa observes.
Challenges
Be that as it is, that Dzimwe radio started with pomp and ceremony, there is an uphill
task of sustaining the radio.Coordinator, Chipungu (Laurey-Panos, 1998) complained
of lack of internet facilities including the issue of donor fatigue. It should also be
mentioned here that during one of the projects sensitisation meeting with members of
the Mangochi District Development Committee, some senior politicians sought
clarification from UNESCO, “what assurance was there, that the radio will not be
used for political purposes?” Whatever that meant, the guess that the radio might
challenge powers that be, may not be far from the truth. In another example, the very
fact that at that time the MAMWA,was perceived to be anti-government, contributed
to some dilly dallying in issuing a licence(Malawi-Unesco,1998).These, plus audience
related factors should give food for thought to those planning any choice of any
development communication mode of what it means to choose any of them. That is
why Bella Mody (1991) is imploring on development communication facilitators to
take into account, “sustained physical access to the message, socio-cultural
sensitivity, political compatibitility, economic compatibility and psychological
appropriateness”.p53
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bourgault, L.1995.Mass Media in Sub Saharan Africa.Indianapolis: Indianapolis University.
Gale, C.2000.Media and Development (online)journa.ru.ac.za/amd/devt.htm
Laurey, F.1998.Community Radio in Africa.Panos Institute: London
Lucas, B.1999.Rural Radio in the Phillipines.FAO
Malawi national Commission for Unesco.1998.Briefing on Developments on Dzimwe Community
Radio.Lilongwe/MW: UNESCO
Malawi National Commission for Unesco.1998.Dzimwe Community Radio Status Report.LL:
UNESCO.
Mercado, C.1992.Development Communication Management. In Journal of
Development Communication.Vol.2.p.13-25.
Ministry of Information.2000.Assessment Report for Dzimwe Community Radio.LL: MW
Mody, B.1991.Desisging Messages for Development Communication Campaigns.
London: Sage
Yadava, 1993.Development Communication and Social Structure: Methodological Thoughts in Nair
and White.1993 (eds) Perspectives on Development Communication.
London: Sage