0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 92 views8 pagesArmacell Test Report
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY
PSB Product Listing Scheme": 2
This Certificate is issued to
Armacell Asia Ltd
583 Orchard Road
#16-01/17-01
Forum Building
Singapore 238884
FOR
Product: Thermal Insulation Material
Brand: ARMAFLEX®
Model: CLASS 1
Country of Origin: UK & China
Product Details: Density : 64 kg/m?
which has complied with the requirements of the scheme and based on the following
Stondard{(s) Test Report(s)
British Standard 476 Part 7: 1997 WARES No. 72385
(Rating : Class ‘1")
Henry Heng
Ghiet Executive Officer
Ceti Dav og i Dieta i Dae iy
020094 01/01/1998 01/01/2002 31/12/2004
PSB-TEST’ “das 4/18 pods dd owe sa on i ds
"hs ef pose el er osha odin xno wi. Ths eee nase py 8 Capron
‘dol evel pegs, Tn a i Cote sae eh so oof Po og Some
Te malas spi gael pe be om en pat pele
PSB
CorporationPEST REPORT
WARRES NO. 71624
BS 476: PART 7: 1997
METHOD FOR CLASSIFICATION OF THE
SURFACE SPREAD OF FLAME OF PRODUCTS
SPONSORED BY
RODUCTS
D INDUSTRIES LIMITED
ARMSTRONG INSULATIO!
A BUSINESS DIVISION OF ARMSTRONG W
MARS STREI
OLDHAM
LANCASHIRE
OL9 6LY
ype SAFETY
Holmestielé Rend. Waringlon, UK WA! 20S + Tel 01925655116 + Far 01825 655419
¥
‘is repoxtmay only be reproduced in fil, Exits or abridgements hall ast be published without pennission af Waring Fre Research CentreHe (issuE 2)
: Page 2 0f7
TEST REPORT
WARRES NO. 71624
BS 476: PART 7: 1997
METHOD FOR CLASSIFICATION OF THE
SURFACE SPREAD OF FLAME OF PRODUCTS ¢
SPONSORED BY
ARMSTRONG INSULATION PRODUCTS
A BUSINESS DIVISION OF ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES LIMITED
MARS STREET
OLDHAM
LANCASHIRE,
OL9 GLY
1 PURPOSE OF TEST
To determine the classification of specimens of 2 product when they are tested in accordance with BS 476: Part
7 1997, *Fire tests on building materials and structures, method for classification of the surface spread of flame
of products”
2. SCOPE OF TEST
BS 476: Part 7: 1997 specifies a method of test for measuring the lateral spread of flame along the surface of a
ated in the ve
specimen of a product al po!
3, and a classification system based on the rate and extent
of flame spread. It provides data suitable for comparing the performances of essentially flat materials,
composites, or assemblies, which ace used primarily as the exposed surfaces of walls or ceilings.
3. DESCRIPTION OF TEST SPECIMENS
ry ‘The description ofthe specimens given below has been prepared from information provided by the sponsor of
the test. All values quoted are nominal, unless tolerances are given.
25 mm
Jick “Armstrong Class | Anmaflex (manufactured at Pariy, China, compound reference ‘PD {056",
colour reference ‘Black’), a cellular nittile-based insulation product having a density of from $7.5 to 67.5,
kg/m’, was Bonded to 12.5 mm thick calcium silicate based board with sodium silicate adhesive.
‘The specimens were supplied by the sponsor. Warrington Fire Rescarch Centre was not involved in any
selection or sampling procedure. Warrington Fire Research supplied the adhesive and the calcium silicate based
board and bonded the composite together
4 CONDITIONING OF SPECIMENS
‘The specimens were ceceived on the 25 April 1997,
Prior to test the specimens were conditioned fo constant mass at a temperature of 23 + 2°C and a relative
humidity of 50 10%.
farvington
EH)
resedicht
consttraner resting10.
assur 2)
30f7
DATE OF TEST
“The test was performed on the 14" May 1997,
TEST PROCEDURE
“The test was perform
should be read in co
Jin accordance with the procedute specified in BIS 476: Part 7: 1997, and this report
unction with that British Standard,
FORM IN WHICH THE SPECIMENS WERE TESTED
‘The specimens were tested in the form of a composite
EXPOSED FACE
‘The foam face of the specimens was exposed to the radiant heat of the test when the specimens were
mounted in the test position,
‘TEST RESULTS AND CLASSIFICATION
‘The test results relate only to the behaviour of the test specimens of the product under the particular
conditions of test; they are not intended to be the sole criterion for assessing the potential fire hazard of the
product in use.
“The test results relate only to the specimens of the product in the form in which they were tested. Small
differences in the composition or thickness of the product may significantly affect the performance during
the test and may therefore invalidate the test results. Care should be taken to ensure that any product which
is supplied or used is fully represented by the specimens which were tested
“The test results forthe individual specimens, together with observations made during the test and comments,
on any difficulties encountered daring the test are given in Table 1
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CLASS DEFINITIONS GIVEN IN BS 476: PART 7: 1997, THE
SPECIMENS TESTED ARE CLASSIFIED AS CLASS 1.
Note: If the prefix ‘D' or suffix 'R' or 'Y' is included in the classificatfon, this indicates that the results
should be treated with caution. An explanation of the reason for the prefix and suffixes is given in
‘Appendix J, together with the irradiance along the horizontal reference line ofthe specimen position during,
the test and the classification limits specified in the Standard. \
INTERPRETATION OF TEST RESULTS
Attention is drawn to Appendix 2 entitled "Effect of thermal characteristics on the performance of
assemblies”
farrington.
Vey
Eonsitrane reste(ssUt 2)
Page 4 of 7
‘The specification and interpretation of fire test methods are the subject of ongoing development and
refinement. Changes in associated legislation may also occur. For these reasons it is recommended! that the
felevance of test reports over five years old should be considered by the user. The laboratory that issued the
feport willbe able to offer, on bchalf ofthe egal owner, a review ofthe procedures adopxed for a particular
test to ensure that they are consistent with etrent practices, and if requited may endorse the test report
esPONSIMLE OFF Anmnov
iow Retype :
scoaxzy reyricor
“rece Officer see
enon 9 Fre Tein ert to Fie Testing
For and on behalfof
WARRINGTON FIRE RESEARCH CENTRE,
DATE OFISSUE: June 5, 1997
(wv0914))
farrington
VsGSSUE 2)
Page 5 of7
TABLE 1
‘SPECIMEN No. ' 2 3
Maximum distance
travelled at 1.5 oo 50 07550
‘intstes (mim)
Distonce (nvm) Time to travel to indicated dstaice
(minutes, seconds)
\ 15 030 025 022
165
190
21s
240
265
290
375
455
500
525
600
675
710
750
785
825
900
‘Time to each maximum
distance travelled 050 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
(minutes, seconds)
Maxinwm distance
travelled in 10 100 50 50. 7550S
‘minutes (rm)
Note: Six specimens are usually tested. If the test on any specimen is deemed to be invalid, as defined in the
Standard, it is permissible for up to a maxinmam of nine specimens to be tested in order to obtain the six valid test
results. 4
OBSERVATIONS MADE DURING TEST AND COMMENTS ON ANY DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED
DURING THE TEST.
In the case of each specimen, transitory flaming occurred fiom the first minute of the test, extending up to a
‘maximum distance of 165 mm along the reference line and up to a maximum distance of 290 mm above the
reference line.
In the case of specimens No.3, No, No.5 and No.6, sustained flaming occurred from the first minute of the test,
approximately 150 mm above the reference line, extending up to a maxinuim distance of 240 mm.
varrington
il
VESCUVLAPPENDIX 1
Irradiance along the horizontal reference line ofthe specimen position during the test
Distance along reference line
from the hotter end of the
specimen position (in mm)
Lrradiance at points
specified above (kW/m?)
Note: 2 tolerance of + 0.5 kW/m? is specified on the iradiance measurement.
t
Classification of spread of flame
325 210
Ms
(ISSUE 2)
Page 6 of 7
525675828
0 «70 «50
SPREAD OF FLAME ATS MIN TINAL SPREAD OF FLAME
cuassisicatiow
usr Lint FOR ONE unit nar FoR ONE
SPECIMEN TN SPECIMEN TN SAMPLE
SauirtE
cis 16s ves+25 165 ves +25
Gis? us 303s 3 see
Gis 3 Xs 265535 ne ioe 95
crest
exceeding hen for Cs
Explanation of prefix and suffix the dassfica
1. Asaffix R is added tothe classification if mote than six specimens are gquired in order to obtain six valid
test results (eg, class 28).
2 A prefix D is added to the classification of any product which does not comply with the surface
characteristics specified in the Standard and has therefore been tested in a modified form (e.g. class D3).
3 A suffix Y is added to the classification if any softening and/or other behaviour that may affect the flame
spread occurs (eg. class 3Y),
For example, a classification of D3RY could be achieved indicating (2) a modified surface has been used; (b) a class
3 result has been obtained; (c) additional specimens have been used to obtain 6 valid results and; (4) softening
‘and/or other behaviour has occurred which is considered to have affected the test result
farvington
Weis
VESCAVCHLWALES No, 71624
(ISSUB.2)
Page 7 of7
APPENDIX 2
Effect of Thermal Characteristics on the Performance of Specimens
“The result of a test in accordance with BS 476: Part 7: 1997 is applicable only to the specimens in the form in which
they were tested. Small differences in the composition or thickness of the product may sigoificantly affect the
performance during the test and may therefore invalidate the test result. tis important that the specimens which are
tested fully represent the product which is supplied and the manner in which it will be wsed
product 10 be tested in a number of different ways:to determine the classification which will be achieved in its
different methods of use
his may require a
‘A surface coating, for example, niay be applied to a selected substrate using 2 particular method and application rate
“The test classification which is achieved for that set of specimens will be applicable only to that situation. If the
substrate or method and rate of application in a particular practical situation are different from that which was tested
then it will be necessary to detennine the classification which will be achieved for that sitvation Similarly,
specimens incorporating, a wallcovering must be fully representative of the situation which occurs in practice and
Il normally consist of the walleovering bonded to a chosen substrate with a chosen adhesive; the test result will
obly apply to that composite system, The same principle applies to any composite or assembly which is being
investigated,
It is sometimes possible to assume a “worst case’ sitwation which will enable a chosen set, or sets, of specimens to be
constructed and tested to provide @ foundation for the assessment of the probable performance of variations within
the system. Similarly itis sometimes possible co formulate 2 series of exploratory tests to investigate the effect of
variations within a product or system, usually culminating in @ series ot formal tests to provide the basis for a
composite assessment of pre-determined variables. In such cases, however, itis essential that careful planning of the
programmes is undertaken by suitably qualified fire safety practitioners.
The following is re-produced from Appendix B of BS 476: Part 7: 1997;
With thin materials or composites, pavticulanly those with 3 high thermal conductivity, the presence of an airgap and
the nature of any underlying construction may significantly affect the ignition performance of the exposed surface
Increasing the thermal capacity of the underlying construction increases the “heat sink” effect and may delay
ignition of the exposed surface. Any backing provided to the test specimen and in intimate contact with it, such as
the non-combustible spacers, may alter this "heat sink’ effect and may be fundamental to the test result itself. The
influence of the underlying layers on the performance of the assembly should be understood and cate should be
taken to ensure that the result obtained on any assembly is relevant toits use in practice.
‘The following advice is offered on the construction and preparation of test specimens;
(a) Where the thermal properties of the product ate such that no significant heat loss to the underlying
layers can occur, e.g, 2 material or composite greater than approximately 6 mm thick of high thermal
capacity and/or low thermal conductivity, then the product should be tested backed only by the backing
board. :
(b) Where the product is normally used as a free-standing sheet and the characteristics noted in (a) do not
apply, then an air space should be provided at the back of the product by testing over spacers of non-
combustible insulation board 20 mm wide and (25 + I)mm thick
(©) Where the product is to be used over a low density non-combustible substrate and the characteristies
noted in (a) do nat apply, then the procuct should be tested in conjunction with that substrate,
(@) Where the product is to be used over a combustible substrate and the characteristics noted in (a) do not
apply, then the product should be tested in conjunction with that substrate
NOTE: Discussions are inking place in ISO/TCOZSCI conceming the possible use of a restriced range of
reference substrates (mainly non-combustible) where it is not apparent or possible (o test materials or
products inthe representative cad-use substeate
farvington
Wey