Enhancing Movie Recommendation Systems through Hybridization of Neural
Networks and Genetic Algorithms
Arvapalli Alekhya1, Priyadharshini B2, N Apoorva3, Gajula Sujan Sagar4 and Jeyakumar G5*
Sno Comments Follow up action Changes made in
carried out ( Page No & Line No)
Reviewer #2
1 The originality of the work is satisfied.
The technical quality of the paper is
satisfactory.
Formatting and presentation are satisfied
2 Add some comparison results and discussion. Page 9 & (Line no 37,38,39)
Page 12 & (Line no10-16, Line
no 29-32)
3 Give a comparison to previous work. The proposed work is No changes made.
compared with already
established work in
‘Benchmark
Comparison’ section.
Hence no action
required on this
comment.
4 Check for grammar and spelling. Document was Page No 2 & (Line No 8, 12, 22),
reviewed and necessary Page No 4 & Line No 26, Page
grammar and spelling No 8 and Line No 29, Page No 11
corrections were made. & Line No 4, Page No 12 & Line
No 9
5 The literature review part is required to be Literature review part Page 3 & Line No 16,17,18 and
improved. is reviewed and 19
required changes are Page No 5 & Line No 7, Page No
made. 5 & Line No 8
6 The result and discussion parts are required to
be improved
7 State the novelty of your work. The novelty of the work Page No 2 & Line No 35
is highlighted at the end
of the ‘Introduction’
section.
8 The author should cite the figure and table in The figures and tables No changes made.
your paper content. presented in the paper
is the original
contribution of the
authors hence no action
required on this
comment.
9 Author research should follow the recent year This paper has referred No changes made.
and also compare your results with recent 4 papers from 2024, 4
articles. papers from 2023, 1
paper from 2022
10 A larger number of references should be added According to the work No changes made.
to your article. presented in this paper,
relevant papers are
referred and added in
the reference section
done. Hence no action
required on this
comment.
Reviewer #9
1 Abstract to be enriched with the precise
summary of the work
2 Pros and cons of existing methods(state of the Pros and Cons of Page No 5 & Line No 7, Page No
art) may be discussed existing methods are 5 & Line No 8
discussed towards the
end of ‘Related Works’.
3 Flowchart/algorithm/methodology to be Added Flowchart Page 6
depicted to interpret the flow of the work.
4 Results are also not so impressive
5 Authors are informed to incorporate above The above comments
mentioned comments are reviewed and
incorporated wherever
necessary. Appropriate
page no and line no are
mentioned.
