Appendix e Service Robotics
Appendix e Service Robotics
1
Figure 11
TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP: SERVICE ROBOTICS
Ability to
demonstrate useful
decision-making and
communicate
effectively
Technology Reach Autonomous
Ability to make some Systems
basic decisions
Autonomy
Ability to be
controlled remotely Building blocks of
Era of sliding autonomy
and using cognitive robots
telepresence
Wearable
Robots
Service Robotics
A robot is a mechanical device that can perform preprogrammed physical tasks. A robot may act
under the direct control of a human (for example, a UAV) or autonomously under the control of a
pre-programmed computer. According to the IFR (International Federation of Robotics), a service
robot is a robot which operates semi or fully autonomously to perform services useful to the well
being of humans and equipment, excluding manufacturing operations.
Robotics is a wide technology area that also encompasses a subset of valuable enabling
technologies. Robotics is an area of increasing interest, investment, and hype. Within this backdrop,
1
The Technology Roadmap highlights the timing, features, and applications of significant technology milestones that
would be necessary for developers of this technology to achieve if successful (equivalent to commercial) application—
and possible disruption—is to occur by 2025.
domestic, military, and healthcare are applications that could be instrumental in driving service
robotics commercialization.
The Enabling Building Blocks
Mobile robots and unmanned systems comprise several subsystems. All these separate systems and
their components must work together to enable the robot to function properly. The technologies
involved in these systems will all require advances if robots are to see extensive use in personal
home and security applications.
• Hardware Technologies. Affordable robots will continue to be built using fairly
conventional hardware—off-the-shelf electronic components, batteries, motors, sensors, and
actuators. The availability of cost-effective hardware is extremely important.
• Practical Robot Software Platforms. Robot software platforms are already available (e.g.
Evolution Robotics). These systems can provide a cost-effective way of producing and
operating home-security robots, and will continue to increase in functionality.
• Robot Cognition and Artificial Intelligence. The development of robots with cognitive
abilities. Advances in artificial intelligence and associated technologies are vital for the
development of intelligent, autonomous robots for domestic applications.
Implications of Advancement in Various Technological Capabilities
Of all the enabling technologies, the development of effective artificial-intelligence systems for
robots is the most uncertain and potentially the most important. However, a paradigm shift in
computing and AI technologies is necessary for it have a major impact on the future of robotics and
their power to be disruptive. If robots obtain the ability to perform multiple jobs around the home
and interact effectively with people socially, the subtleties of the behavior of such personal robots
will become highly important. Monitoring developments in the way humans relate to existing
robots will certainly help researchers improve the products of the future. Fundamental
psychological and neurological research may play a key role in determining how humans and
robots can communicate effectively. The development of AI systems that enable such
developments is unlikely (even given favorable conditions) before 2020.
If a step change occurs in robotics/AI technologies, and players develop robots that are able to
think and act autonomously—or at least act with a large degree of autonomy—then the implications
of the technology will be great. Robots will be able to carry out tasks without any human
intervention, including military, security roles, industrial roles, and even domestic tasks. Such
robots would not only remove the need for humans to perform dull or strenuous work and improve
the safety of some jobs, but could also completely remove any danger from some work. For
example, robots will minimize war casualties—destruction of a robot soldier would not cause any
harm to a human soldier, and such systems could be used to counteract guerilla and terrorist tactics.
The use of an intelligent robotic workforce could improve the competitiveness of U.S. industries.
However, the complete automation of military and civil tasks could also have more negative
implications. As an extreme example, if all domestic tasks are performed by robots, then obesity
could become even more of a problem than it is today. In addition, families and domestic workers
(cleaners, cooks, gardeners) could also be affected by the increasing use of robots. The use of
robots for traditionally “skilled” tasks could result in higher levels of unemployment in some areas,
although industry has already adapted well to the use of industrial robots.
Synergistic Technologies
The field of robotics is multidisciplinary and advances in any number of scientific and engineering
field could improve robot capabilities. Because robots are computer-controlled machines, advances
in computer hardware and software are obviously synergistic. Advances in microprocessor speeds
and abilities are directly applicable to improving the speeds and capabilities of robots. Some
specific examples of key synergistic technologies follow:
• Wireless communications technologies. Wireless technologies already enable robots to
communicate with the outside world. Wireless technologies and infrastructure will continue
to advance and thus enable an increase in robot functionality.
• Sensor technologies (vision, chemical, infrared, sonic). Robots require a multitude of
sensors to gather data in order to perform home security functions. These sensors must work
well together (sensor fusion) and must be cost-effective.
• Advanced materials and electronics technologies. Advances in processors (and other
microelectronics), and also in advanced actuators (e.g. artificial muscles) will be necessary
to improve the functionality and performance of robots, and especially to limit the overall
size and complexity of advanced robots.
• Low-cost high-performance energy and power systems. Robots currently have a severely
limited range. For a home-security robot to operate effectively, it needs to be able to work
for long periods without charging or re-fuelling. In addition, the charging or re-fuelling
process must be a quick and convenient process. Totally new power systems will likely be
required before robots can operate effectively for long periods of time.
Applications
Key Uses and Instantiations of Service Robotics
Robots are in use—and are under development—to automate difficult, tedious, or dangerous jobs
across a broad range of applications (see below). In addition, robots can also be used for pure
entertainment, and also for educational purposes.
Current Affected Products or Services
Industrial robots have already revolutionized many manufacturing environments. The industry in
general is now fairly mature, with considerable progress having occurred in the past 20 years.
Service robots are also in use in military applications and in our homes and in society (such as
toy robots and domestic robots, but their impact so far has been limited). In Japan, professional
service robots are emerging for applications such as security, patrolling shopping malls and for
reception-type applications, especially as robots for hire. In addition, surgery, telecommunications,
and robotics have combined to enable remote surgical systems (such as those developed by
Intuitive Surgical).
Figure 12
ROBOTICS TIMELINE
Figure 13
INTERNATIONAL STATUS OF ROBOTICS INDUSTRY
United States
Japan
India
1
2
3
China European Union
4
5
South Korea
Defense organizations (DARPA, for example) generate substantial funding for R&D, and
defense applications often act as a proving ground for innovative technologies (including robotics)
and thus the impact of developments in this sector is extremely high.
The global nature of robotics and the countries involved is also important. From an applications
standpoint, a cursory glance at global activity would unveil two countries at the forefront of
robotics development: Japan and the United States. For a considerable time, Japan has been at the
forefront of robot development. Japanese researchers—commercial and academic—have been
responsible for many of the major developments in entertainment, domestic, and humanoid
robotics. Robotics researchers in the United States have also been extremely influential, with key
developments in autonomous vehicles, robots for security, defense robots, and domestic robots. In
addition, U.S. and Japanese researchers continue to make important developments in health care
robots, autonomous vehicles (unmanned aerial vehicles and unmanned ground vehicles), and
human-augmentation technologies (for example, exoskeletons). An interesting contrast also exists
between some of the two countries’ most prolific robot projects—for example, the sophisticated
prototype humanoid robots of Honda and Toyota (both in Japan) versus the simple functionality of
iRobot’s (United States) commercially successful products. The media continue to focus on the
research efforts of large universities in these countries—especially high-profile institutions such as
Carnegie Mellon University and Waseda University. Of course, much important work is ongoing
outside Japan and the United States—for example, in Europe and China. South Korea also seems
particularly determined to make an impact on the nascent nonindustrial robotics industry.
Items to Watch
2
Figure 14
SERVICE ROBOTICS: ISSUES AND UNCERTAINTIES
Artificial
Intelligence
R&D
“Killer”
Hig h Applications
Me dium
Low
Un certainty
Source: SRI Consulting Business Intelligence
From Figure 14, the key areas of uncertainty to monitor and better understand are:
• Military-robot implementation. Military applications account for a growing number of
robot installations, especially in the United States. Trends and developments in this area
are certain, but nevertheless important to monitor. However, the U.S. military has set
clear goals on the capabilities of future unmanned systems, and whether or when these
goals will be achieved is still under debate. In addition, it is uncertain how applications
for many military-derived robots will spread beyond military applications and into civil
applications. For example, UAVs for police and coastguard use are natural successors to
military UAVs.
• Power and motion technologies. From research laboratory prototypes to production-
ready models, mobile robots already move around in many different ways. Researchers
continue to integrate existing technologies into robots, and develop totally novel mobile-
robot designs. Many simple mobile robots feature wheels, while other robots rely on
2
Figure 14 illustrates major issues and events that will have an impact on the rate or direction of a technology’s
development and thereby application. The impact of these issues and events is plotted against a measure of uncertainty,
where uncertainty implies insufficient knowledge of how (and usually just when) the issue or event will be resolved or
be sufficient to drive or hold back development of the technologies. An organization that is able to accurately predict or
(better) influence or dictate the outcome (thereby moving the issue/event to the left of the figure), will have a distinct
advantage over organizations that are still in the dark or just passively following developments.
sophisticated motion systems—for example, the legs of bipedal and quadraped robots.
Developments in motion systems could simplify future robot systems significantly.
Most mobile robots currently rely on existing power technologies—namely motors and
batteries—but existing systems can place limits on a robot’s operation time and range.
Developments in battery technologies could significantly improve the performance of
mobile robots. In addition, developments in other power technologies are important to
monitor. Many companies are now developing fuel-cell technology for a wider range of
products—for example, cellular phones and laptop computers. The use of fuel cells in
mobile robots is currently at an early stage of development, but growth in demand for
service-sector robots could drive their development.
• Robot standards and safety. In some applications, robot users, vendors, robot
developers, and enabling technology providers will need to develop standards for robot
capabilities and interoperability of components. Players are starting to collaborate to
develop standards for professional service-sector robots. However, in general, standards
surrounding personal robots are still nascent and developments in this area are far from
certain. Monitoring activity in this area is important, including progress in the
development of standards in general—such as those that the Object Management Group
is promoting. The safety of any new technology is also a key issue—especially in a
litigious society such as the United States. If robots are to fulfil useful roles outside
industry and in society, ensuring their safety is of prime importance.
• Killer applications. The emergence of a killer application for service robots likely
requires a step-change in the intelligence or capabilities of robots. Although
manufacturers have taken many important steps toward the commercialization of
service-sector and consumer robots, the future for the industry in general is far from
certain. Despite extensive R&D and initial successes in some applications, a lurking
concern among many players is that too few people will buy robots to sustain a viable
consumer-robot industry. Many questions remain unanswered, relating to technology,
applications and markets. Monitoring for “killer applications” is difficult, but rapid,
sustainable growth is the only true indicator. In terms of domestic robots, cleaning is
perhaps the closest thing to a killer application at present (with over two million units
sold worldwide). Several uses for professional service robots could become killer
applications; in particular look for developments in robots for agricultural applications.
And in both literal and metaphorical terms, military robots could also become a killer
application area for robots.
• Artificial intelligence and artificial life. The development of effective artificial
intelligence systems for robots is extremely uncertain. However, a paradigm shift in AI
technologies would have a major impact on the future of robotics, and so monitoring
developments in this area is essential. (Also, developments in AI-related technologies
and components—such as fuzzy logic and neural networks—need monitoring.) The
ultimate manifestation of AI, artificial life, would have even greater—some
commentators would say Machiavellian—implications. Bottom-up AI approaches
derive from an understanding of how biological systems accomplish complex sensory,
cognitive, and motor tasks. Other, (top down) approaches seek to create robots with
intelligence by equipping them with advanced sensors and high-power processors. The
(more) conventional, top-down approach, which has been the pursuit of roboticists and
AI researchers since the 1960s, has achieved a fair degree of success in addressing the
application of robots in highly structured and controllable environments—that is, in
industrial automation, and simple non-industrial applications. Bottom-up approaches
have yet to prove their potential, although researchers have succeeded in creating
biomimetic robots that approximate the behavior of some animals.
Directional Signposts
Identifying the major issues that will determine how service robotics will develop and
understanding the uncertainty of items important to watch help us to understand better the potential
dynamics of development and application that we might see in the future. That heightened sense of
awareness is necessary because the United States will want to formulate a policy and act before
unambiguous evidence on the drivers and barriers to, and direction of advancement of service
robotics technology is available. Preparation for a watch-and-respond system is essential to identify
signposts that would indicate whether the advancement of this technology is proceeding rapidly or
not. The following developments are likely to occur near the suggested years, and their outcomes
will strongly influence the status of service robotics. Their occurrence would indicate that the
above issues and uncertainties were being resolved in the direction of positive development and
application of service robotics.
• 2007—DARPA Urban Challenge successfully completed by at least one team
• 2009—Future Combat Systems (FCS) Test Unit implemented
• 2010—Chinese army implements military robots
• 2011—WowWee releases Robosapein V10, a toy robot that can recognize and fetch many
items belonging to the user from around the home
• 2012—Brain machine interface developed that enables noninvasive control of devices
• 2014—Robots used alongside soldiers in combat situations (unmanned combat vehicles—robot
soldiers that can fire on an enemy)
• 2015—Global market for nonindustrial robotics reaches $15 billion
• 2019—Semiautonomous robot home-helpers launched by Japanese and South Korean players
• 2020—Thought-controlled unmanned vehicles with “sliding autonomy” used in military
operations
• 2025—Autonomous robots find first applications.
Within the timeline that these developments are likely to occur, various signposts will be important
to watch for and to monitor on a global level in order to understand the direction and pace with
which the field is advancing and to better assess the potential threats to and opportunities for U.S.
interests. Key signposts, which, if positive, would indicate that service robotics technologies are
progressing, include:
• The size and nature of robotics investments in the United States
• Players involved in robotics R&D—watch for either another key player to follow Sony’s
lead and abandons robotics altogether, or for a new player to follow Microsoft and invest
heavily in robotics.
• Global levels of funding for robotics research—in particular, whether investment continues
to rise or is cut.
• Toy becomes tool: The point when a toy robot has the ability to perform a useful task within
the home (for example, retrieving an object for the user).
• The establishment of centers of excellence in robotics research outside the United States
and models for research and commercialization.
• The completion of initial (international) research programs for the development of cognitive
robots
• The development of noninvasive brain-machine interfaces
• The launch of Chinese designed and built robots for domestic, service-sector, and defense
applications
• Development of unmanned vehicles with sliding autonomy for both civil and defense
applications
• The development and implementation of national and international standards for service,
domestic, and military robots.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this Service Robotics disruptive technology profile:
AI artificial intelligence
DARPA Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
FCS Future Combat Systems
IFR International Federation of Robotics
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology
R&D research and development
UAV unmanned aerial vehicle
UGV unmanned ground vehicle