NEA CSNI R2010-15 Technical Basis For Commendable Practices On Ageing Management
NEA CSNI R2010-15 Technical Basis For Commendable Practices On Ageing Management
Final Report
JT03300214
The NEA Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations (CSNI) is an international committee made
up of senior scientists and engineers, with broad responsibilities for safety technology and research
programmes, and representatives from regulatory authorities. It was set up in 1973 to develop and
co-ordinate the activities of the NEA concerning the technical aspects of the design, construction and
operation of nuclear installations insofar as they affect the safety of such installations.
The committee’s purpose is to foster international co-operation in nuclear safety amongst the
OECD member countries. The CSNI’s main tasks are to exchange technical information and to
promote collaboration between research, development, engineering and regulatory organisations; to
review operating experience and the state of knowledge on selected topics of nuclear safety
technology and safety assessment; to initiate and conduct programmes to overcome discrepancies,
develop improvements and research consensus on technical issues; to promote the co-ordination of
work that serves to maintain competence in the nuclear safety matters, including the establishment
of joint undertakings.
The committee shall focus primarily on existing power reactors and other nuclear installations;
it shall also consider the safety implications of scientific and technical developments of new reactor
designs.
In implementing its programme, the CSNI establishes co-operative mechanisms with the NEA’s
Committee on Nuclear Regulatory Activities (CNRA) responsible for the programme of the NEA
concerning the regulation, licensing and inspection of nuclear installations with regard to safety.
It also co-operates with the following NEA committees on matters of common interest: Committee on
Radiation Protection and Public Health (CRPPH), Radioactive Waste Management Committee (RWMC)
and the Nuclear Science Committee (NSC).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of figures
List of tables
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Executive summary
The number of ageing nuclear power plants is increasing in OECD/NEA member countries.
Accordingly, maintenance programmes, in-service inspection and testing of structures, systems and
components important to safety have been implemented to ensure that levels of reliability and
effectiveness remain in accordance with the design assumptions. This is often being done using an
integrated ageing management strategy based on state-of-the-art technologies.
Ageing effects, especially material degradation, have progressively been experienced world wide
and since the start of nuclear power plant operation. Material degradation is expected to continue as
plants age and operating licenses are extended.
Two subjects – stress corrosion cracking (SCC) and degradation of cable insulation – were selected
as the focus of the SCC and Cable Ageing Project (SCAP) due to their relevance for plant ageing
assessments and their implications on nuclear safety. In order to achieve that goal, 14 NEA member
countries joined the project in 2006 to pool their knowledge, and 3 additional countries joined during the
course of the project. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the European Commission
participated as observers.
When establishing the project it was recognised that in the limited time available ageing
management could not be addressed in detail over a large range of topics. SCC has been and
continues to be a serious problem and in recent years cable ageing has been identified as an area
requiring more attention from both regulators and industry. Incidents in these areas often occur and
draw attention. These two topics were therefore chosen for specific study in the project as examples
of areas in which ageing management has been applied for many years and in which ageing
management still needs to be developed through an internationally co-ordinated study which could
yield greater insights into the management of these topics.
The objective of this internationally co-ordinated project is to share the corporate knowledge and
operating experience to understand the failure mechanisms and identify effective techniques and
technologies to effectively manage and mitigate active degradation in nuclear power plants.
The specific objectives of the project are to: i) establish a complete database with regard to major
ageing phenomena for SCC and degradation of cable insulation through collective efforts by NEA
members; ii) establish a knowledge base in these areas by compiling and evaluating the collected data
and information systematically; iii) perform an assessment of the data and identify the basis for
commendable practices which will help regulators and operators to enhance ageing management.
The scope of this project involves the development of a knowledge base and commendable
practices that address common elements in the management of ageing and mitigation of failures for
components and cables: study of ageing effects, investigation of failure mechanisms, mitigation of
influencing factors, prediction of conditions for replacement, safety assessment of components,
qualification testing (environmental qualification for cables) and condition monitoring.
According to IAEA Safety Guide NS-G-2.12 “Ageing Management for Nuclear Power Plants”,
effective ageing management throughout the service life of SSC requires the use of a systematic
approach to managing ageing that provides a framework for co-ordinating all programmes and
activities relating to the understanding, controlling, monitoring and mitigation of ageing effects of the
plant component or structure.
The SCAP SCC knowledge base was established by analysing and evaluating the data from the
viewpoint of the implementation of appropriate ageing management beneficial both to the regulators
and licensees. The practices of particular importance (e.g. key to the maintenance of SCC) were
identified as commendable practices for the purpose of appropriate ageing management of SCC, the
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Background
The number of ageing nuclear power plants is increasing in OECD/NEA member countries.
Accordingly, maintenance programmes, in-service inspection and testing of structures, systems and
components important to safety have been implemented to ensure that levels of reliability and
effectiveness remain in accordance with the design assumptions. This is often being done using an
integrated ageing management strategy based on state-of-the-art technology.
Ageing effects, especially material degradation, have progressively been experienced world wide
and since the start of nuclear power plant operation. Material degradation is expected to continue as
plants age and operating licenses are extended. It is clear that unanticipated and unmanaged structural
degradation could result in significant loss of safety margins, undermining public confidence and
straining the resources of both regulatory authorities and the operators.
For regulatory authorities, it is also important to verify the adequacy of the ageing management
methods applied by the licensees, based on reliable technical evidence. Two subjects – stress
corrosion cracking (SCC) and degradation of cable insulation – were selected as the focus of the SCC
and Cable Ageing Project (SCAP) due to their implications for nuclear safety and their relevance for
plant ageing assessment.
In order to achieve that goal, 14 NEA member countries initially joined the project in 2006 to pool
their knowledge. A further 3 countries joined while the project was being conducted, for a total of
17 participating countries. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the European
Commission also participate as observers. The project was financed through a Japanese voluntary
contribution to the NEA. Japanese technical institutions are also actively co-operating in the project
under the co-ordination of the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) of Japan.
When establishing the SCAP project it was realised that in the limited time available ageing
management could not be addressed in detail over a large range of topics. Stress corrosion cracking
has and continues to be a serious problem and in recent years cable ageing has been identified as an
area requiring more attention from both regulators and industry. Incidents in both areas continue to
provide periodic surprises. These two topics were therefore chosen for specific study in the SCAP
project, being examples of areas in which ageing management has been applied for many years (SCC)
and one in which ageing management still needs to be developed (cable ageing), in an internationally
co-ordinated study which was anticipated could yield greater insights into the management of these
failures.
This report summarises the project results of SCAP after four years of operation, from June 2006
to June 2010.
1.2 Objective
The objective of this internationally co-ordinated project is to share the corporate knowledge and
operating experience so as to better understand the failure mechanisms and identify effective
techniques and technologies to manage and mitigate active degradation in nuclear power plants.
INTRODUCTION
The project participants are experts in the fields of SCC and cable ageing and come from regulators,
industry, research institutions and academia. They provide the relevant information and perform the
assessments needed for the proper execution of the programme.
The Project Management Board (MB) runs the project with assistance from the NEA Project
Secretariat (Figure 1.3-1). The MB responsibilities include, but are not limited to: approving the
programme of work to be carried out by the working groups on SCC and cable; monitoring the project’s
progress in terms of results and time lines; and supervising reporting within and outside the project.
There are two working groups, one dealing with SCC and the other with cable insulation
degradation. The working groups are responsible for carrying out the programme of work and
ensuring the quality and timeliness of the reporting within and outside the project. Each working
group is supported by a clearing house. The clearing houses work to ensure the consistency of the
data contributed by the participating countries. They verify whether the information provided
complies with the SCAP Coding Guidelines. They also verify the completeness and accuracy of the
data, and maintain and distribute copies of the databases.
Seventeen (17) member countries are participating in one or both of the SCAP working groups:
Argentina, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, Norway,
the Republic of Korea, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine and the United States.
INTRODUCTION
Participation in the project is open to the government of any country, whether or not they are a
member of the OECD, or to any national agency, public or private organisation designated by such
government provided the government agrees with the Terms of Reference which were specified during
the first Management Board meeting. Each member country nominates a national representative for
both the SCC Working Group and/or Cable Working Group respectively who is responsible for the
administration of the project within his/her respective country.
Each participating country has submitted data through its national representative. The data has
been entered according to a coding format which was specifically developed for the databases and
which is explained in the Coding Guidelines and the Quality Assurance Programme for the two
working groups. Each participant has been exclusively responsible for its use of information generated
under the project. Both the SCC and the cable databases are password protected, and the contents and
data analysis results are distributed only among active working group members under the project
Terms of Reference.
1.4 Scope
Based on differences in the fundamental knowledge concerning the SCC and cable insulation
degradation mechanisms, as well as the operating experience associated with SCC and cable insulation
degradation events, it was expected that the scope and focus of the databases for these two topics
would differ from each other. The SCC event database is based on event occurrences, including piping
and component failures. On the other hand, since cable failure or event occurrences are rare under
normal operating conditions and because of the highly magnified cable stresses in an accident
mitigation environment, the cable database is focused on cable material qualifications and condition
monitoring methodology and its validation.
The scope of this project involves the development of a knowledge base and commendable
practices that address common elements in the management of ageing and mitigation of failures for
components and cables: study of ageing effects, investigation of failure mechanisms, mitigation of
influencing factors, prediction of conditions for replacement, safety assessment of components,
qualification testing (environmental qualification for cables) and condition monitoring.
The NEA has initiated various activities in the last decade to collect information and share experience
regarding ageing mechanisms, developing databases, technical reports, position and guidance
documents in support of assessment and management of long-term operation (the more recent NEA
reports are Refs. [1-5]).
The IAEA has worked on ageing problems and their relevance for the safety of nuclear power
plants since the mid 1980s. The first documentation was published in 1990 as an overall description of
the problem [6]. Shortly after, in 1991 and 1992, IAEA published two documents describing methods to
approach ageing management [7,8]. At the end of 1990 a document was published concerning the
introduction and supervision of ageing management programmes [9]. Since 1992 a number of specific
advisory documents have been published concerning different components [10,11], including their
relevance for safety and why they should be included in an ageing management programme, which
degradation mechanisms can be expected to occur and how to detect and manage them. In 2009 the
collective experience of these documents was summarised with the publication of an IAEA Safety
Guide [12-14].
Ageing problems are best tackled through a systematic programme in which existing relevant
activities for ageing management are co-ordinated. Therefore ageing management includes the
documentation of relevant programmes and activities and a description of how these different
programmes are co-ordinated in a systematic manner that guarantees continuous improvement by
incorporating operational experience and relevant research results. The documentation should also
address which maintenance, control, inspection and monitoring should be covered is necessary as
well as the frequency and the scope of these activities. To maintain degradation to an acceptable level,
it is necessary to understand possible degradation mechanisms; suitable operational conditions that
are designed to minimise degradation; control, inspection and monitoring techniques that need to be
INTRODUCTION
used to detect degradation in time; evaluation criteria to determine if sufficient safety margins remain
if degradation is detected, and methods to manage, repair or replace components. In order to work
in a systematic manner, it is necessary to understand the underlying design principles, including
relevant regulations, codes and standards, operational and maintenance histories, results from
inspection programmes, safety evaluation criteria and procedures, generic operational experience and
research results.
According to the IAEA Safety Guide, effective ageing management throughout the service life of
structures, systems and components (SSC) requires the use of a systematic approach to managing
ageing that provides a framework for co-ordinating and harmonising all the programmes and
activities related to the understanding, controlling, monitoring and mitigation of ageing effects of the
plant component or structure. This approach is illustrated in Figure 1.5-1, which is an adaptation of
Deming’s “PLAN – DO – CHECK – ACT” cycle to the ageing management of SSC based on understanding
the ageing of a structure/component; the closed loop of Figure 1.5-1 indicates the continuous
improvement of the ageing management programme for a particular structure or component, on the
basis of feedback of relevant operating experience and results from research and development, and
results of self-assessment and peer reviews, to help ensure that emerging ageing issues will be
addressed adequately. Every ageing management programme should have nine generic attributes
described in the IAEA Safety Guide:
• scope of the ageing management programme;
• preventative actions to minimise control and ageing degradation;
• detection of ageing effects;
• monitoring and trending of ageing effects;
• mitigation of ageing effects;
• acceptance criteria;
• corrective actions;
• operating experience feedback and feedback of research and development;
• quality management.
For the safe long-term operation of nuclear power plants it is necessary to develop and implement
effective ageing management programmes. It is generally recognised that a proactive approach is
preferred since this allows the nine attributes of a successful programme in accordance with the IAEA
Safety Guide to be implemented in a timely manner.
However, effective ageing management can be jeopardised by several factors that might lead
either to unexpected or premature ageing (i.e. ageing degradation that occurs earlier than expected).
These factors or weaknesses need to be identified and addressed if the proactive approach to ageing
management for safe long-term operation is to be successful. The most frequently encountered
weaknesses of ageing management are:
• insufficient understanding or predictability of ageing;
• lack of data for ageing management;
• inadequate communication and co-ordination;
• inadequate safety culture;
• error-induced ageing;
• inappropriate use of reactive ageing management;
• insufficient capability for dealing with unforeseen ageing phenomena.
Throughout the plant operating period, it is important to implement a comprehensive ageing
management programme starting early in the plant life to ensure safe long-term operation. In many
countries comprehensive ageing management activities are now included from the early stages
of plant operation and are reviewed regularly both through routine supervision and as part of the
INTRODUCTION
Periodic Safety Review (normally every ten years). Some countries perform a first extensive review in
connection with the Periodic Safety Review associated with 30 years’ operation and others as part of
the license renewal process.
Therefore, knowledge should be extracted from the database (operational experiences and recent
findings) by analysing and evaluating the data from the viewpoint of the implementation of
appropriate ageing management and maintenance activities beneficial both to regulatory authorities
and operators. The knowledge which can contribute to the smooth “PLAN – DO – CHECK – ACT” cycle
for ageing management of SSC based on understanding the ageing of structures/components, and the
closed loop of Figure 1.5-1.
Under the “PLAN – DO – CHECK – ACT” cycle, knowledge has been extracted from the database of
each member country (i.e. analysis and evaluation of database) and transferred to the knowledge base
through discussion with experts. Ageing management and maintenance activities are to a large extent
based on international events and technical knowledge. As the regulator, it is very important to
review the adequacy of ageing management conducted by utilities/operators, based on a reliable
technical information basis (TIB). The TIB should be updated regularly to ensure timely, adequate
ageing management and maintenance activities to improve ageing management.
The commendable practices are extracted from the knowledge base collected from project
members, for the appropriate management of ageing phenomena (e.g. those common to member
countries or key to the maintenance of individual ageing phenomena) and the improvement of ageing
INTRODUCTION
management programmes as described in the IAEA Safety Guide. It should be noted that commendable
practices are included in the knowledge base. The definition and process for determining commendable
practices is illustrated in Figure 1.5-2.
The database, knowledge base and commendable practices form a living technical information
base and are updated continuously to reflect the latest findings.
CP
Knowledge base
(including CP)
Analysis &
evaluation
Database
(operational experience
and recent findings)
1.6 Definitions
In this report, the definitions of ageing management and maintenance activities from the IAEA Safety
Glossary [15] are used as follows:
Ageing management
Engineering, operations and maintenance actions to control within acceptable limits the ageing
mechanism of structures, systems and components.
• Examples of engineering actions include design, qualification and failure analysis. Examples
of operations actions include surveillance, carrying out operating procedures within specified
limits and performing environmental measurements.
• Life management (or lifetime management) is the integration of ageing management with
economic planning: i) to optimise the operation, maintenance and service life of structures,
systems and components; ii) to maintain an acceptable level of performance and safety; iii) to
maximise the return on investment over the service life of the facility.
Maintenance
The organised activity, both administrative and technical, of keeping structures, systems and
components in good operating condition, including both preventive and corrective (or repair) aspects.
Corrective maintenance
Actions that restore, by repair, overhaul or replacement, the capability of a failed structure, system or
component to function within acceptance criteria.
• Contrasted with preventive maintenance.
INTRODUCTION
Periodic maintenance
Form of preventive maintenance consisting of servicing, parts replacement, surveillance or testing at
pre-determined intervals of calendar time, operating time or number of cycles. Also termed “time-based
maintenance”.
Planned maintenance
Form of preventive maintenance consisting of refurbishment or replacement that is scheduled and
performed prior to unacceptable degradation of a structure, system or component.
Predictive maintenance
Form of preventive maintenance performed continuously or at intervals governed by observed
condition to monitor, diagnose or trend a structure, system or component’s condition indicators;
results indicate present and future functional ability or the nature of and schedule for planned
maintenance. Also termed “condition-based maintenance”.
Preventive maintenance
Actions that detect, preclude or mitigate degradation of a functional structure, system or component
to sustain or extend its useful life by controlling degradation and failures to an acceptable level.
• Preventive maintenance may be periodic maintenance, planned maintenance or predictive
maintenance.
• Contrasted with corrective maintenance.
2.1 Introduction
Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is an ageing mechanism for which many events have occurred in
different structures, systems and components (SSC) of nuclear power plants since the 1970s, continuing
through to the present time. The causes of these events have been identified as sensitisation of material,
local high residual stress, surface finishing and hardness associated with certain environments such
as high-temperature water. For these reasons, it is necessary to carry out maintenance activities,
inspections with the appropriate interval, monitoring, preventive maintenance/mitigation repair/
replacement and safety assessments to minimise the occurrence of future events.
The counter measures for SCC should be included in the ageing management programme (AMP).
To achieve the targets of an ageing management policy for safe long-term operation, it is necessary to
select the systems and components, identify the specific SCC degradation mechanisms/phenomena, and
determine the criteria to ensure that the intended function of the system or component is maintained.
It is necessary to assume an operating period and include the evaluation result in a preventive
maintenance plan (or AMP covering inspection, repair, replacement, monitoring or surveillance).
To achieve this, a well-grounded Technical Information Basis (TIB) is required. To maintain the
TIB, it is necessary to take into account the feedback from the results of research and development,
codes and standards, trends of the specific degradation mechanism, and consolidation of appropriate
maintenance programme.
The establishment of an AMP for SCC is illustrated schematically in Figure 2.1-1.
Figure 2.1-1: Schematic ageing management programme for stress corrosion cracking
The relationship between the nine generic attributes of the IAEA Safety Guide [12] and the
activities of the SCC Working Group are shown in Table 2.1-1.
The general aim of the knowledge base and commendable practices is to reflect basic
international technical information (event data, R&D, etc.) for AMP and to provide a state-of-the-art
description of the SCC phenomena treated and the main factors influencing their occurrence, the
locations affected, as well as the strategies available for mitigation and repair. This information is
useful for both regulators and utilities to establish and review AMP.
The working group was to identify commendable practices for ageing management of the
different SCC degradation mechanisms for safe long-term operation. In order to achieve this, the
working group agreed to establish an event database using similar principles to those already
established within the OPDE project. The event database also covers experience such as field data
from light water reactor events and field experience from inspections. In addition it was recognised
that a knowledge base must also be established in order to identify commendable practices. The two
together have been evaluated and provide the basis for the SCC portions of this report.
The scope of the event database, knowledge base and commendable practices covers Class 1 and 2
pressure boundary components, reactor pressure vessel internals and other components with
significant operational impact, excluding steam generator tubing.
The ageing mechanisms included in the event database and materials affected (base metal, weld
metal and cladding) are:
• intergranular SCC (IGSCC) of stainless steel;
• IGSCC of Ni-based alloy including primary water SCC (PWSCC);
• irradiation-assisted SCC (IASCC);
• trans-granular SCC (TGSCC);
• external chloride SCC (ECSCC);
• strain-induced corrosion cracking (SICC);
• corrosion fatigue/environmental fatigue.
The entire SCC database consists of an event database and general information. The general
information consists of regulations/codes and standards, inspection/monitoring/qualification,
preventive maintenance/mitigation, repair/replacement, safety assessment and R&D. Together these
comprise the knowledge base.
The knowledge base is the identified knowledge, as an outcome of analysis and evaluation of the
entire SCC database (event, operating experience and recent findings) for appropriate ageing
management and maintenance activities. The knowledge base has also been identified from the key
data and information contained in the database to establish an AMP for a specific ageing mechanism
from the database of member countries, as well as discussion among the experts. The knowledge base
can be used for establishing an AMP and the technical information basis (TIB).
The database, knowledge base and commendable practices are the living technical information
base and are updated continuously to reflect the latest findings as illustrated in Figure 2.1-2.
PWSCC
General Information
▪ IASCC ➜contribute to the
database appropriate ageing
▪ TGSCC
management and
▪ ECSCC, etc.
●Regulation / continuous
Code & standards improvement of
●Regulation / Code & standards ageing management
●Inspection / Monitoring /
●Inspection / Monitoring / programme
Qualification
Qualification
●Preventive maintenance /
●Preventive maintenance / Mitigation
Mitigation
●Repair & replacement
●Repair & replacement
●Safety assessment
●Safety assessment
●Research & development
●Research & development
The SCC Working Group has been supported by the project consultant, a clearing house and two
expert consultants, one for BWR and one for PWR aspects. The working group has held ten formal
meetings as well as a number of informal meetings with the Japanese SCC Working Group, the
consultants and the working group chairperson. Thirteen countries (Canada, the Czech Republic,
Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland and the United States) have actively participated in the activities of the group, contributing
to the event database and the knowledge base. The clearing house has together with the NEA IT-group
established the event database which is a web-based relational database using Microsoft® Access. The
project consultant has together with the NEA IT-group established the knowledge base which is
available on the project website to all members. The two SCC experts have written comprehensive
reports of SCC in BWR and PWR based both on their own knowledge and experience correlated with
an evaluation of the information in the event database.
Most members of the working group are also members of the OECD/NEA Pipe Failure Data
Exchange (OPDE) project. This database contains a considerable number of piping events caused by
stress corrosion cracking. It was agreed at a very early stage that the SCAP-SCC event database would
be based on the OPDE database following a review of the fields and identification of additional fields.
Events could then be extracted from OPDE and comprise a major part of the SCAP-SCC event database.
More information on the contents of the event database is given in Section 2.2.
Based on previous experience from populating the OPDE database a decision was taken to
concentrate on so-called “representative events”. A representative event is typical for several identical
or very similar events and is intended to contain all the relevant information and references for such
events. This simplifies the data input since similar events can be entered in a simplified format with
only the basic information and a note that they are coupled to the reference event.
National reporting requirements and practices vary considerably in the member countries. This
means that for some of the member countries confidential information has been entered to make the
entries comprehensive and to improve utilisation and interpretation of the database contents. This
has led to the need to restrict access to the database to those countries that have contributed to the
database. This is also consistent with the terms of the OPDE database, which is only available to
members supplying data to the project. The event database can only be accessed with individual user
names and passwords.
2.2.1 Scope
The SCAP SCC event database addresses passive components degradation or failure attributed to SCC
occurring at nuclear power plants in participating countries. The opening screen is shown in
Figure 2.2.1-1. The scope of the event database includes Class 1 and 2 pressure boundary components 1,
reactor pressure vessel internals and other components with significant operational impact, excluding
steam generator tubing.
The following mechanisms are considered in the event database: intergranular SCC in austenitic
stainless steel and nickel-based material, irradiated-assisted SCC, primary water SCC, external
chloride SCC and trans-granular SCC.
2.2.2 Structure
The SCAP SCC event database is a web-based relational database (Figure 2.2.2-1). The data entry is
managed via input forms, tables, roll-down menus and database relationships. Database searches and
applications are performed through user-defined queries that utilise the tables and built-in data
relationships. The data entry forms are organised to capture essential passive component failure
information together with supporting information. The four data entry forms are described below,
and an example is shown in Figure 2.2.2-2.
1. Class 1 and 2 pressure boundary components are defined by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers
(ASME) as follows: Class 1 includes all reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB) components; Class 2 generally
includes systems or portions of systems important to safety that is designed for post-accident containment and
removal of heat and fission products.
Flaw characterisation
This form contains 11 fields with information that characterises the flaw (description, information
about size and further details according to the type of flaw).
ISI history
This form consists of four fields. While primarily intended for recording in-service inspection (ISI)
programme weaknesses, the free-format field may be used to document any information pertaining
to the ISI of the affected component, or ISI history such as the time of most recent inspection.
Root-cause information
This form consists of 52 fields and includes information regarding the estimated age of the component,
i.e. the in-service life at the time of failure. If the affected component has a known repair or replacement
history this is to be taken into consideration.
A free-format field is provided to describe the location of failure, i.e. line or weld number or using a
piping and instrumentation (P&I) reference. Roll-down menus present different options for choosing
the method of detection, the apparent cause and contributing factors. Finally, a free-format field is
included to provide information relevant to the root-cause analysis and cause-consequence relationship.
15 representative PWR records of a total of 507. It should be noted that the contents of the OPDE and
SCAP SCC event databases are not the same since the fields differ to some extent. The contents for
BWR RPV internals in the SCC event database are shown in Table 2.2.5-1. The contents of the SCC
event database on PWR non-piping passive components are shown in Table 2.2.5-2. The differences in
the numbers in the text, tables and figures are due to the use of representative events. As described
above, these have been chosen as events for which a relatively complete set of information is
available, rather than for the most part the events for which much of the SCC specific information has
not yet been entered, or is not available.
A representative event is typical for several identical or very similar events and is intended to
contain all the relevant information and references for such events with information in the majority
of the fields. This allows similar events to be entered in a simplified format with only the basic
information and a note that they are coupled to the reference event.
Table 2.2.5-1: Contents for BWR RPV internals in SCC event database
Table 2.2.5-2: Contents of SCC event database on PWR non-piping passive components
General information
General information includes both data and information on the following items for ageing management:
• regulation/codes and standards;
• inspection/monitoring/qualification;
• preventive maintenance/mitigation;
• repair/replacement;
• safety assessment;
• R&D (initiation/crack growth/fracture).
In addition, documents and reports published by regulators and technical support organisations
(TSO) and by operators in member countries have been collected and compiled. Two consultant
reports on IGSCC and PWSCC prepared by the expert consultants are included. One report covers
stress corrosion cracking of stainless steels in BWR. The report includes a historical review of SCC,
empirical correlations based on plant and laboratory experience, a quantitative understanding of the
mechanism of cracking, parametric dependencies of SCC under irradiated and un-irradiated conditions,
and a rationale for various mitigation actions. The other consultant report covers primary water stress
corrosion cracking of nickel-based alloys. The report includes a brief history of PWSCC in PWR, a
review of laboratory investigations on PWSCC of Alloys 600, 132, 182 and 82, an analysis of general
information on PWSCC and mitigation techniques for PWSCC.
Country reports on knowledge are another source of information prepared by members of the
SCC Working Group. Some country reports cover the general information on each SCC mechanism
and others cover information on each item of regulation/codes and standards, inspection/monitoring/
qualification, preventive maintenance mitigation, repair/replacement.
2.3.1 Introduction
The structure of the knowledge base is illustrated in Figure 2.3.1-1. The knowledge base consists of the
event database, general information data and information on SCC mechanisms.
Country reports contain data and information on SCC operating experience and general
information. Some country reports cover the general information on each SCC mechanism, while
others cover information on individual SCC mechanism, regulatory framework and approaches, and
operators’ ageing management activities. The knowledge base also contains basic information on safety
assessment approaches, regulations/codes and standards, inspection, monitoring and qualification
practices, preventative maintenance, mitigation, repair and replacement, as well as R&D.
The future user of the SCC knowledge base can access the information regarding their home
country immediately, whilst having access to all the other information.
Inspection/monitoring/qualification
Preventive maintenance/mitigation
Repair/replacement
Safety assessment
Inspection/monitoring/qualification
Preventive maintenance/mitigation
Safety assessment
Repair/replacement
PWSCC
IASCC
SICC
TGSCC
ECSCC
Corrosion fatigue
Consultant reports
Country reports
: Same basic structure
The general aim of the knowledge base is to provide a state-of-the-art description of the SCC
mechanisms treated and the main influencing factors, the affected locations of SSC, as well as the
strategies available for mitigation and repair. This information provides the basis to identify the
commendable practices useful for establishing AMP.
The knowledge base comprises information identified from the databases (events, operational
experience and recent findings), which is analysed and evaluated from the viewpoint of the
implementation of appropriate ageing management and maintenance activities.
Figure 2.3.2-1: An example of a search result (search with the keyword “IGSCC”)
The IGSCC morphology was associated with the temperature/time fabrication conditions that
gave rise to thermal sensitisation and the formation of chromium carbide precipitation (e.g. M23C6)
and chromium depletion at the grain boundary. The reduction in chromium concentration adjacent to
the grain boundary gives rise to a reduction in passivity and makes the material susceptible to
intergranular stress corrosion cracking.
Since the late 1970s, the importance of water purity control became increasingly apparent,
especially with regard to creviced components (where the geometry and oxidising conditions in the
bulk environment could give rise to increased anionic activity in the creviced region), even though the
bulk water purity was acceptable at that time. This water purity aspect was of importance for
environmentally-assisted cracking of stainless steel and low alloy pressure vessel steels and
nickel-based alloys.
Subsequent to the introduction of low carbon and stabilised grades of stainless steel IGSCC has
occurred in these materials that were clearly not in a sensitised condition. It has been shown that
their susceptibility to IGSCC is due to cold work induced during fabrication. In many cases the initial
cracking was found to be initially transgranular then changing to an intergranular cracking mode. The
initial transgranular cracking is often associated with a surface layer of cold work induced by grinding.
Failures have also occurred where the occurrence of IGSCC was attributed to the presence of either
severe bulk cold-worked material (cold bent piping). The mechanism by which cold work renders
austenitic alloys susceptible to IGSCC in BWR environments is not fully understood and is still being
investigated. It is possible that there is an unfavourable interaction between deformation-induced
martensite, high residual stresses and strains, and localised deformation.
SCC seldom occurs in austenitic stainless steels under the PWR primary coolant water condition,
as the dissolved oxygen content of the PWR primary coolant system is normally controlled at an
extremely low level.
the higher temperatures generated can have a significant effect on void swelling. In addition, neutron
capture induces transmutation reactions and hence changes in chemical composition of the material.
Irradiation hardening and radiation-induced segregation (RIS), resulting in chromium depletion and
silicon enrichment at grain boundaries, are considered to be the most probable factors leading to
IASCC susceptibility.
Plant type
SCC mechanism PHWR VVER
BWR PWR
(CANDU) (PWR)
IGSCC (SS, BWR) 1 027* – – –
IGSCC (SS, PWR) – 085 – 2
IGSCC (Ni-based alloy, incl. PWR) 0 017* 323 – –
ECSCC 0 027* 063 –
TGSCC (SS, ferritic steel) 0 050* 033 15 3
SICC 0 026* 001 01
IASCC 0 008* 002 1
Corrosion fatigue –
Total 1 155* 507 16 6
three factors may not be sufficient. Therefore it is recommended if possible to eliminate at least two
SCC factors in order to improve the effectiveness of the mitigation method. This can also be achieved
by applying a combination of mitigation methods.
The commendable practices which can be identified from an analysis of the event database and the
general information comprising the knowledge base are discussed in Chapter 4 and not in Chapter 2,
so as to avoid repetition.
Figure 2.3.4.1-1: Historical summary of IGSCC for stainless steel components in BWR
CANDU - 17 Records
140
Mandated Inspections
100
No. of Data Records
40
20
IGSCC is a cracking phenomenon occurring initially in 304 SS and other materials, which develops
along the grain boundaries. It occurs under synergistic effects of three factors in austenitic stainless
steel such as 304 SS with carbon content exceeding 0.03 wt.%. The three factors are: the material
sensitisation by heat input during welding, surface hardening heat treatment such as nitrising, etc.;
the residual stress caused by welding; and the water chemistry environment such as high dissolved
oxygen content, etc. However, in recent years, IGSCC has also been observed in non-sensitised
austenitic stainless steel, such as 316NG SS, 316L SS, etc., in nuclear components having improved
IGSCC resistance compared with 304 SS, owing to material surface hardening by machining and cold
work or surface residual stress resulting from cutting, grinding, etc.
Low-carbon stainless steel was developed and adopted considering the analysis results of IGSCC
initiation in 304 SS due to sensitisation and the corrective measures taken. In those days, it was
considered that the improvement of material only is sufficient to prevent SCC. However, many IGSCC
incidents occurred in low-carbon stainless steel. Accordingly, a combination of several technologies
was adopted instead of a single corrective measure to address potential SCC in a more effective
manner. For example, regarding SCC in low-carbon stainless steel, it was determined to reduce
residual stresses as well as to remove the surface hardened layer. By taking the measures to address
two of three factors causing SCC, the SCC initiation was successfully controlled.
Regarding inspection, in sizing SCC which has developed into stainless steel welds, the
requirements according to the Potential Drop (PD) system were imposed and thus a certain level of
accuracy can be maintained. In addition, utilities’ operating experience has shown that SCC may
arrest or the SCC propagation rate may significantly decline in the middle of the depth depending on
the residual stress and the configuration of the flaw.
It is desirable that SCC incidents at operating nuclear power plants and knowledge about SCC in
other countries be widely shared among the regulatory authorities, academia and industry so that
such experience and knowledge can be immediately incorporated into corrective actions, and that the
regulatory authorities, academia and industry will work closely to verify the validity of an evaluation
as soon as possible.
Regarding IGSCC, many events have been observed and much research undertaken to understand
its mechanism on low carbon stainless steels. Based on the above background, preventive maintenance
measures (recommended practical actions) considering the possibility of IGSCC initiation and crack
growth are described below.
The PWSCC records in the database can be analysed to reveal the most vulnerable locations and
occurrence rates in the PWR primary circuit. Tables 2.3.4.2-1 and 2.3.4.2-2 summarise the wrought
Alloy 600 and Alloy 132/182/82 welds affected by PWSCC for, respectively, RPV, steam generators,
pressurisers and primary circuit penetrations. The last group listed in Table 2.3.4.2-1 essentially only
concerns B&W and combustion engineering design PWR. It is not immediately apparent from these
tables how important a role surface finish has played in the incidence of PWSCC and this can only be
deduced by reading the narrative accounts in the event database and associated publications.
Consequently, mitigation methods for components that are not too severely cracked as to warrant
repair or replacement concentrate on improving surface finish and residual stress state.
It can be seen immediately in Tables 2.3.4.2-1 and 2.3.4.2-2 with some reservations relating to
CRDM nozzles in RPV upper heads, that there is a very strong influence of operating temperature on
the incidence rate of PWSCC. Nevertheless, Alloy 600 and Alloys 182/132 have cracked at cold leg
temperatures, albeit at a significantly lower incidence rate.
The reasons why the effect of temperature appears to be much less apparent in the case of CRDM
nozzles and J-welds could be related in part to the uncertainty in the actual temperature of operation
in so-called “cold” upper heads. The primary water that circulates into the upper head may,
depending on the particular plant design, originate from the hot leg or the cold leg. In the former case,
there is no uncertainty as to the temperature of the CRDM nozzles and J-welds on the underside of the
upper head, but in the latter case, an experience has certainly indicated that there is significant
uncertainty, which may be due to convection effects from the mass of hot leg water below the upper
core internals support plate. Another location where there could be similar uncertainty in the actual
temperature of the component is the steam generator channel head drain nozzle, which, depending
on design, is often located beneath a small hole in the divider plate at the bottom of the channel head.
In any event, the apparent lack of a strong effect of temperature in the operating experience of
Alloy 600 CRDM nozzle cracking was also significantly affected by other highly distributed parameters,
such as intrinsic material susceptibility and residual fabrication stress.
Another observation that can be made on the data shown in Tables 2.3.4.2-1 and 2.3.4.2-2 is that,
in Alloy 182/82 welds, cracking is usually believed to have initiated in the Alloy 182 part of a weld and
then propagated, seemingly without difficulty, into the Alloy 82 part of the weld. However, as mentioned
earlier, there are a very small number of PWSCC events that have without doubt initiated in Alloy 82.
These cases appear to be characterised by design features or weld repairs that severely exacerbated
residual fabrication stresses.
The evolution of PWSCC in Alloy 600 components with operating time and its dependence on
stress, surface finish, material susceptibility and temperature have already been addressed. Similar
predictive tools have not yet been developed for Alloys 132/182/82 although crack growth equations
are available for conservatively evaluating the future growth of any defects found by non-destructive
examination.
The event database can be used to examine the evolution of detectable cracking with operating
time in Alloy 132/182/82 welds. However, some reliance has to be placed on judgments from the
original failure analyses as to whether PWSCC initiated first in Alloy 600 or in Alloy 132/182/82 where
both were present and cracked in the same affected component. This approach updates an analysis
where 148 cases of PWSCC initiation in Alloys 132/182/82 welds were plotted as the cumulative
number of cracking incidents as a function of effective full power hours. Interestingly, the continuous
evolution of cracking revealed then and by the updated plots based on 161 cases shown in
Figures 2.3.4.2-2 and 2.3.4.2-3 were uncorrected for operating temperature differences.
120
RPV CRDM welds (290°C-318°C)
RPV BMI welds (290°C)
RPV nozzles welds (290-326°C)
100 PRZ nozzles welds (340-345°C)
RCS + DHR nozzles welds (290°C-325°C)
Cumulative number of cracked welds
SG Cladding (325°C)
SG drains welds (290-325°C)
80 SG nozzles welds (320-325°C)
60
40
20
0
10000 100000 1000000
90
Cumulative number of cracked welds
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10000 100000 1000000
The United States NRC defined the effective degradation year (EDY) as a function of effective full
power years (EFPY) and RV head top operating temperature to estimate the timing of PWSCC
occurrence. The NRC assumes that the susceptibility to PWSCC initiation increases as EDY becomes
larger. In Japan, temperature-accelerated constant load tests of base metal were conducted and the
test result was used to develop an equation to estimate the timing of PWSCC as a function of applied
stress and RPV head top operating temperature. However, PWSCC in the weld metal grows along the
grain boundaries of columnar crystal. PWSCC initiation in the weld metal is suspected to have been
caused by defective welding application and high residual stress on the surface due to grinding.
Therefore, the frequency of PWSCC initiation may increase depending on the operating years, service
temperature and stress. It is expected that the susceptibility to SCC of nickel-based alloy weld metal is
higher than that of base metal.
Considering that the possibility of PWSCC initiation in nickel-based alloy increases as a plant
ages and that PWSCC susceptibility of weld metal is higher than that of base metal, it is desirable that
inspection should be conducted in an assured manner and Alloy 600 components should be replaced
with corrosion-resistant Alloy 690 components as necessary. At the same time, it is necessary to
improve the inspection accuracy so that PWSCC can be detected at an early stage. For example, the
detection ability of ultrasonic testing and eddy current examination techniques needs to be improved
and technologies applicable to narrow gaps need to be developed. In addition, research on the
estimation of the timing of PWSCC initiation both in base metal and weld metal should be promoted
while collecting new knowledge about PWSCC world wide. At the same time, it is necessary to work
on the establishment of evaluation techniques, including the improvement of detection ability and
accuracy in estimating the propagation rate. In addition, repair and replacement methods, including
peening and stress improvement, should be developed.
For feedback to another structure system and component, it is recommended to make analysis
and evaluation based on the event database and knowledge base of OECD/NEA SCAP, to review
inspection, evaluation, repair, replacement and preventive maintenance.
The SCAP SCC event database also allows the practical repair, replacement and maintenance
strategies adopted in various countries to combat PWSCC in nickel-based components to be catalogued
and compared. A summary is shown in Table 2.3.4.2-3. Two zones where repairs have either not been
necessary to date or are not known to have been implemented at the time of writing are, respectively,
core radial supports (no cracks reported) and steam generator divider plates, even if cracking has been
observed in divider plates.
2.3.4.3 IASCC
Irradiation-assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC) is a mode of the ageing mechanism in which
cracking occurs in BWR and PWR core internals when the component is irradiated to high fluence.
PWR
As shown in Figure 2.3.4.3-1 and Table 2.3.4.3-1 only a few events attributed to IASCC have been
reported in the event database. In the 1980s, inspections of older French PWR revealed cracking in
baffle-former bolts. The bolts were made of type 316 cold-worked (CW) stainless steels. They were
damaged by intergranular cracking. Normally, AISI 316 steel is not prone to IGSCC in the PWR primary
coolant environment and all the bolts cracked were predominantly located in the second and third
rows from the bottom, where the highest neutron fluence is expected. This demonstrated that the
neutron irradiation played a significant role in this cracking, even though the detailed mechanism is
as yet unknown. Until now, baffle-former bolt cracking was mainly observed in the “down-flow”
design of reactor vessel internals (RVI) either before or after the conversion to “up-flow”.
As a proactive countermeasure against baffle-former bolt damage, two different measures were
applied to PWR plants. The first measure was to replace baffle-former bolts by bolts with a better
mechanical design. All the baffle-former bolts made of AISI 347 stainless steel have been replaced in
Japan by new ones made of 316 CW stainless steel. The second approach was to replace all the reactor
vessel internals. Lower internals including baffle-former bolts and upper internals were replaced in
four PWR plants in Japan.
Complete steam
Radial supports
head nozzles
Lower head
generators
Inlet/outlet
Channel
Nozzles
nozzles
nozzles
sleeves
nozzles
Divider
Heater
Upper
head
plate
Split
RPV
pins
Technique
Replacement FJSU FJKSU F FU FGJKSU KSU
Spool piece U J J
replacement
Cutting, drilling, JSU U J
grinding
Temper bead JU JU FJ SU
welding
MSIP U
Overlay clad U U U
(external, full
structural)
Overlay clad U U
(internal)
Inlay clad (internal) JS J
Half nozzle repair U
Seal welding JU
Shot peening J U
Water jet peening J J
Laser stress J
improvement
Key: Technique applied in F = France, G = Germany, J = Japan, K = Korea, S = Sweden, U = USA.
BWR
As shown in Table 2.3.4.3-1, in BWR, several events involving IASCC in control rods have been
reported in the event database but no events of IASCC in core shrouds have been reported. It is well
known that several plants in the US and in Japan have experienced cracking in their core shrouds, and
it is to be expected that some of these will be added to the event database in the future.
ECSCC is transgranular type stress corrosion cracking (TGSCC) initiated for the reason that chlorine
in the sea salt grains, high polymer products, etc., attach to the material surfaces. It has been initiated
for the reason that the outside surfaces of components are not kept properly clean, then further
contaminated with chlorides. These chlorides are then dissolved by dewing, deliquesce with the
humidity in the air, etc., and the environment which contains chloride ions on the material surfaces
is produced.
With this in mind, and as mentioned above, preventive maintenance measures (recommended
practical actions) with respect to ECSCC initiation and crack growth are as follows.
Materials used for storage or curing during construction or maintenance and repair work have
also been reported to cause TGSCC. Therefore the amount of halides should be controlled within the
allowable level. In particular poly vinyl chloride (PVC) tape should not be used in contact with
stainless steels. If PVC tape is used, special care should be taken to clean the surface after it has been
removed. The selection of lubricants for bolt tightening should be made taking into account the
possibility of SCC initiation. Other factors of importance are the presence of halides and the
prevention of dew condensation inside the containment.
Figure 2.3.4.6-1: Historical summary of SICC in ferritic steel piping of German plants
boundary conditions, such as reduction of the oxygen content in the water phase during start-up and
avoidance of corrosion during the shutdown period. In most cases, partial replacement or local repair
was performed.
However, some incidents of minor safety significance occurred due to SICC outside the
containment even in the 1990s, which indicates that the issue has not yet been completely solved.
Another consideration when comparing the environmental effects between laboratory and service
components is the applied loading associated with pressure and thermal transients. Laboratory
testing typically relies on simple mechanically-controlled loading transients (e.g. artificially shaped
waves), and may arguably include some amount of compensation for the effects of more complex
thermal transient loading. Additionally, plant components are often subjected to thermal transients
with long-lasting hold times at almost constant load or temperature corresponding to steady-state
operating conditions which may lead to some strain recovery within the component. These differences
should be taken into consideration because they can significantly affect fatigue lives.
Currently, different regulatory approaches are being pursued or initiated to explicitly address
environmental effects as part of component fatigue design in countries with operating nuclear power
plants (NPP), especially as longer-term operation of NPP is considered. These approaches are based on
use of existing environmental factors derived from previous laboratory test programmes, reduced
environmental factors based on tests that attempt to more accurately simulate plant loading and
environmental conditions, or predicted “attention factors” of cumulative usage factor (CUF). Once a
component exceeds the attention factor, additional measures are applied.
2.3.5.2 Inspection/monitoring/qualification
Inspection and monitoring techniques applied in the past have undergone many developments.
Today most countries use ultrasonic and eddy current testing techniques and have established
qualification procedures to ensure reliable detection of cracks. Some countries require test pieces with
“natural” crack morphology in the qualification process, reflecting the experience that artificial cracks
or notches may not be adequate to achieve the detection capability desired.
The applicable codes and standards and regulatory documents for the inspection of pressure
boundary components and internal structures for SCC mechanisms are identified in the knowledge base
in the country reports. The information regarding the qualification of non-destructive examination
(NDE) systems are summarised as a separate table in the knowledge base web interface.
The operators shall perform inspection of vessels, pipes and other components specified by the
codes and standards of academic societies in order to comply with the requirements in the laws and
regulations. Besides those inspections, and in the event SCC is detected, the regulatory authority may
require the operators to implement special inspection by specifying the concerned sections made of
material susceptible to SCC, timing of inspection and inspection methods considering previous
actions taken by domestic and overseas NPP to address detected SCC.
The determination of special inspection depends on incidents of SCC in material for which SCC
has been hardly observed, validation of the applicability of new flaw detection and evaluation methods,
and safety significance of a flaw which is different from previous cases. However, the regulatory
authority may take flexible actions by specifying the timing and start of inspection period according to
the extent of measures to be taken to address SCC in the concerned section. In order to ensure such
flexibility in special inspection for SCC, both the regulatory authority and operators should work
on collecting data from operating experiences which show the countermeasures against SCC and
their validity.
Regarding regulatory requirements, operators conduct inspections of vessels and piping based on
the code and standards. In some cases, extended inspections are required based on the regulatory
practices that instruct location, timing, scope and methods of inspection as the feedback of operating
experiences of observation of SCC domestically and overseas.
In these cases, materials and characterisation for which SCC has not yet been observed,
application and validity of detection and evaluation methods on SCC and so on are considered.
However, there are some exemptions that flexible actions for location, timing, scope and methods of
inspection are applied by the extent of SCC countermeasure. In these cases, it is of importance to
populate the operating experience data to confirm the SCC countermeasures and their validity and
effectiveness.
It is necessary to make the AMP appropriate to the ageing mechanism (e.g. those common to
member countries or key to the maintenance of individual ageing mechanism) and the improvement
of AMP (e.g. six attributes of an effective ageing management programme).
It is one of key points that more sophisticated ageing management is to undertake timely and
adequate maintenance activities in compliance with the age specific to each plant. Another one is
harmonisation of maintenance and ageing management activities from plant construction. The
following ageing management is conducted:
• ageing management from the early stage of NPP operation;
• ageing management every 10 years within the framework of PSR;
• ageing management before the operation for 30 years and following every 10 years.
The inspection methods for each SCC mechanism are described in the paragraph of inspection/
monitoring/ qualification in Section 2.3.3 (SCC mechanism).
For the development of an adequate inspection and ageing management programme the extent
of information available from surveillance and monitoring systems as well as the population of
systems, structures and components involved is to be considered. Specifically for a small population
of systems, structures and components being operated under similar conditions the international
exchange of operating and inspection experience as it is achieved by SCAP is of importance to
broaden the knowledge of the issue.
Regarding methods for inspection, signal processing, evaluation and interpretation of results,
further improvements are to be expected in the coming decades as was the case in the past driven by
technological developments in the NDE area. The inspection of areas where previous inspections have
been performed with different techniques may deliver results which are difficult to evaluate without
knowing the details of different inspection techniques. Therefore the documentation of the inspection
method applied and qualification procedures used is important and need to be maintained.
and the results of research and development. Evaluation items such as the philosophy of check/
inspection and preventive maintenance, methods, plan and its performance are addressed in the
ageing management related manual. Therefore, current knowledge on these items was analysed and
summarised.
For preventive maintenance, mitigation, repair and replacement, it is effective that one of three
SCC factors at least is excluded. However, it is not sufficient to exclude only one of the three SCC
factors because the mechanisms of some SCC are uncertain.
When selecting the combination of preventive maintenance, mitigation, repair and replacement
measures, it is desired to consider the extent of understanding of related SCC, technology level
applicable to plants, operating experiences and regulatory framework. In many countries, however,
ageing management is conducted taking these factors into account.
Table-2.3.5.3-1 shows an example of the preventive maintenance, mitigation and repair techniques.
As described in the section on inspection/monitoring/qualification, there are practices based on the
latest knowledge such that flexible practices on inspection timing and scope are conducted by the
extent of preventive maintenance, replacement and repair applied.
For stainless steels and nickel-based alloys the flaw acceptance criteria are generally based on
limit load analysis reflecting the ductile characteristics of the materials involved. Following the
concept applied in the design to demonstrate the integrity of components of operational and design
basis accident loads.
Regarding IASCC, it is considered that possibility of occurrence is less if the fluence does not
exceed the threshold value, it is requested to conduct maintenance taking cumulative fluence into
account. For PWR, it is anticipated that some location (e.g. baffle former bolts) with the high potential
of IASCC might occur in the extent of no affect to the intended function of components when the
neutron fluence exceeds the threshold. Therefore, as with the ageing management, it is requested to
conduct evaluations and predictions of the cumulative fluence at locations with a high potential of
occurrence and to perform appropriate measurement near the threshold value.
Mechanisms
• Mechanism studies for PWSCC and IASCC initiation to improve the prediction of initiation.
• Development of disposition curves for safety assessment using quality-assured crack
propagation data.
Materials
• Studies of the long-term resistance to stress corrosion cracking of replacement materials such
as Alloy 690.
Inspection of SCC
Regarding inspection on SCC, there are technical issues of detectability and sizing of SCC of Ni-based
alloys and PWSCC from experiences of inspections at the fields. It is necessary to study to reduce the
area inaccessible for inspection and to study inspection at location conducted repair welding such as
weld overlay methods because of remaining inspectability issues. From the viewpoints of reasonable
inspection, it is necessary to develop inspection technology applied during operation. It is necessary
to develop and verify the non-destructive inspection combined of UT and ECT technology in the
future when it is expected that inspection may be conducted with good efficiency and high accuracy.
The themes of research and development are listed as follows:
• to verify the UT inspection accuracy;
• to develop inspection equipments and its technology to improve the inspection accessible
area and to improve UT inspection accuracy;
• to prepare codes and standards reflecting the results of research and development in a
continuous manner.
3.1 Introduction
Electrical cables are installed approximately 1 000 to 2 000 km for each nuclear power plant (NPP).
They transmit instrument and control signals, supply power to electric components such as motors,
actuators for power-operated valves. Certain cables for safety-related systems are required to remain
operational until the last stage of an in-service period, during and following a design basis event such
as a loss of coolant accident (LOCA).
Typical construction of the cable consists of conductor, insulator, filler, tape and jacket and is
shown in Figure 3.1-2. The filler and tape are used for fitting them into the cable, and the jacket is for
the protection of the insulator from external force that might be applied during cable installation. The
insulator has the function of assuring electric independence between the conductor and ground or
between the conductors and is made of polymer material such as XLPE, EPR and SIR.
RCV
Cable tray
Conduit
Cable tray
Power supply Thermometer
Motor operated valve
The insulator degrades during normal operation due to various environmental factors, such as
temperature, radiation, moisture, etc., and their combined effects. In general, degradation of polymer
is said to be attributed to oxidation. It causes chain scission or cross-linking among chains and the
oxidative products such as carbonyl and hydro-peroxide accumulate in polymer matrix. The electrical
property and mechanical property degrade with the degree of oxidation and such phenomenon is
generally referred to as insulation degradation and it progresses with time.
In addition to the degradation which occurs during normal operation, rapid degradation of cable
insulator progress can occur under the severe environments such as the design basis event (DBE) and
it will cause failure. Therefore appropriate ageing management for cables, especially for safety-related
cables, is important for prevention of potential failures and for safe long-term operation of NPP.
For maintenance, inspection and condition monitoring for cables is performed to detect
degradation of the insulation. When degradations are detected, cables are repaired or replaced.
However, it is difficult to evaluate the integrity of safety-related cables in a LOCA environment based
on the results of the inspection or condition monitoring techniques currently used. The type of test
that simulates degradation of the cable during normal operation and the LOCA environment is
performed as an environmental qualification (EQ) test. In addition, environmental condition monitoring
during normal operation is performed to confirm that the environmental conditions of the place
where the cables are installed are within the design basis assumptions and the result of the
monitoring is also used to requalify the service life of the cables. If the environment condition is very
severe, mitigation of the cable’s installed condition may be applied.
A few countries have introduced a requirement to perform a flame propagation test on aged
cables. This requirement is to ensure that the flame retardant capabilities have not degraded due to
operational ageing. A representative sample of cables has to be tested for their fire properties to
confirm its continued suitability for nuclear plant application. Generally, XLPE, EPR, EVA based cables
show no changes after the ageing. PVC cables improve their fire retardant properties due to the loss of
flammable plasticisers during the ageing.
3.2.1 Scope
The cable database covers safety-related cables that support emergency core cooling, safety cables
(required to prevent and mitigate a design basis event) and cables important to plant operation (cables
whose failure could cause a plant trip or reduction in plant power). The scope of the database includes
cables with voltage levels up to 15 kV AC and 500 V DC, including instrumentation and control (I&C)
cables.
The operating experience shared by the participating countries indicated that there were other
environmental factors such as moisture intrusion, chemical and adverse environment that could
degrade the cable during its normal service (non-accident) conditions. Therefore, it is important to
monitor the operational readiness of the cable periodically or in response to unanticipated service
conditions. The cable condition monitoring techniques have been evolving and the industry has not
yet developed a single test that could evaluate the condition of all the variety of cable designs.
In order to share the evolving techniques applicable to the variety of cables, the working group
decided to include the cable condition monitoring techniques and the related research, study and
publications to the database.
The database is organised in 10 parts to document all the details of the cable including design,
qualification, maintenance, condition monitoring and continuing research. Data entry in the SCAP
cable database is managed via tables and roll-down menus. Database searches and applications can
be performed through user-defined field entries. The data entry tables are organised to capture
essential cable insulation failure events along with information regarding environmental qualification
and condition monitoring. The 10 data entry sheets are as shown in Figure 3.2.2-1.
Figure 3.2.3-1: Entry point for the database search tool, showing panels
for selecting the main search criteria, i.e. parts, countries and search strings
To narrow the search down to one or more fields within one part, each part has a dedicated
search/display criteria panel allowing the user to specify in detail the actual field(s) to be considered
in the search. In the same way the user can choose which field(s) of that particular part shall be
displayed in the search result list. See Figure 3.2.3-2 for an example from “Part 8: Regulatory
information for cable/Continued confirmatory and exploratory research”.
An example of a database search and its outcome is shown in Figure 3.2.3-3. Here, searching for
the word “Regulatory” within “Part 8: Regulatory information for cable/Continued confirmatory and
exploratory research”, given any country and a list of applicable cable regulations, organisation, a
contact name for the regulator, etc., are displayed in the figure. Viewing or editing detailed record
information based on the search results list can be done by choosing “[Show/Update] selected search
result”.
National or
international Classification of the importance to safety
standard
Systems important to safety Systems not
IAEA
Safety Safety related important to safety
Systems important to safety
IEC 61226 Unclassified
Category A Category B Category C
France N4 1E 2E IFC/NC
European utility F1B (automatic
F1A (automatic) F2 Unclassified
requirements and manual)
Japan PS1/MS1** PS2/MS2** PS3/MS3** Non-nuclear safety
1E, safety related, or Non-safety related
USA
safety Important to safety Balance of plant (BOP)
Important to safety Not important to safety
CANADA
Not safety, not safety
(CSA Std Safety, safety related
related
N209.14)
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4
* DBE: design basis event. (There is also Class 1 in Russian regulations, but it is not relevant to I&C systems and does not
correspond to IAEA Safety, IEC Category A and IEEE Class 1 categories.)
** PS: prevention system, MS: mitigation system. There is no cable classified as PS1.
The Ukraine systems on nuclear power plants are categorized into four classes based on the
influence on plant safety:
• Class 1: Fuel elements and systems of NPP for which failures led to fuel element damage
exceeding the limits specified for the design basis event (DBE).
• Class 2: Systems for which failures led to fuel element damage within the limits of DBE.
Elements of safety systems for which failures led to failures in operation of such systems.
• Class 3: Elements of safety systems not belonging to 1 and 2 safety classes. Systems for
protection of plant personnel and residential population from radiation.
• Class 4: System for normal operation of NPP which are not relevant for safety. Other systems
not belonging to1, 2 and 3 safety classes.
EPR
EPDM
EVA
Power
PE
Control
Insulation material
PEEK Inst.
PVC Coaxial
SHPVC
SiR
XLPE
XLPO
Other
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
Number of record in the database
Asbestos braid
CR
CSPE
ETFE
Glass braid
Jacket material
PEEK Power
PVC Control
SHPVC Inst.
Coaxial
SiR
XLPE
XLPO
Other
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300
Number of record in the database
The design temperature and dose rate of the cable recorded in the database are shown in
Figures 3.3.1-3 and 3.3.1-4.
In Spain, PVC insulated cables are not commonly used in NPP. Only two plants have used them in
safety-related applications.
In a BWR plant, 1E, PVC insulated, instrumentation and control cables have been used, but these
cables were located in mild environmental conditions and, as a consequence, were not required to be
qualified for DBE conditions. The cables have recently been visually inspected and tested, according to
the “Cable Ageing Management Program” developed in support of the plant “Life Extension
Application”. No significant degradation has been found in these cables after 40 years of operation.
60°C < T
13 cables T ≤ 40°C
20 cables
50 C < T ≤ 60°C
o
14 cables
D ≤ 0.001 Gy/h
0.1 Gy/h < D 18 cables
25 cables
Another PWR plant has installed 1E instrumentation and control cables with PVC insulation and
a polyethylene jacket. These cables are located outside reactor containment (containment annulus)
and they are required to function under a harsh environment (HELB conditions). These cables “Pirelli
Radiflam” (see database cable ID 511) have been qualified according to IEEE-383-74. Pirelli specified a
maximum continuous duty temperature of 70°C for these cables. During the qualification process the
cables were aged at 110°C for 8 days. Maximum DBE qualified temperature was 112°C. After 23 years
of operation, no ageing degradation has been reported by the plant for these cables.
In Japan, special heat-resistant PVC (SHPVC), an improved type of PVC using heat-resistant
plasticisers (which withstand up to 80°C) and polyvinyl chloride resins with a high degree of
polymerisation, is used mainly for the cables installed in high-temperature area. The maximum
temperature of continuous duty for the cables with SHPVC, specified in Japanese standards for electric
power utilities, is 80°C. Some cables installed outside the containment vessel of BWR are required to
perform their function under DBE environment, and thus they are qualified by EQ test.
The Argentinean programme to qualify in-containment cables for the CAREM advanced reactor
project concluded against the use of PVC insulated cables. In this context, and based on international
experience, the life cycle of cable ageing management was developed with a special focus on
environmental qualification. The first efforts concerned the evaluation of material characterisation
and thermal endurance properties. The first set of materials to be studied was PVC cable insulation.
Plastiser characterisation and content evaluation were done and the activation energy evaluation was
done based on IEEE standards.
This last set of tests was carried out with elongation at break curves vs. time curves at three
different temperatures. Once this step was completed, the value of the intersection between 50%
elongation at break (relative to the un-aged material) and time was stored for each curve. Finally from
the slope of the linear regression of the graphics log time vs. reciprocal temperature, activation energy
was derived.
The results indicated that, even though it was possible to evaluate activation energy in this
manner, such property has a strong dependence on the value chosen for elongation at break. It was
concluded that commercial PVC formulation does not follow Arrhenius behaviour and therefore, it is
undesirable to use this model to predict future ageing characteristics and cable performance.
Unknown
Non-EQ cable
8 cables
25 cables
EQ cable
535 cables
Q period ≤ 40 yrs.
15 cables
50 yrs. < Q period ≤ 60 yrs.
20 cables
The post-accident mission time in the United States varies widely, ranging from two weeks to
180 days and in certain cases the duration is more. The approach to post-accident mission and the
corresponding qualification period evolved from the early 70s and marked differences were noted
following the Three Mile Island Accident in the US.
The post-accident temperature profile of the core, containment environment, radiation, etc., forms
the basis for mission time for each of the accident mitigation systems. While specific mission time
may offer some relief on the duration and level of environmental qualification of certain components,
the general practice had been to qualify the common cables for the worst-case environment. Certain
operators have opted to specify component specific mission time based on its specific mission and the
associated cable would need only the same mission time. Certain specialty cables may be qualified for
a limited mission time because of specific chemical property limitations.
In Japan, the “Assessment of Electrical Equipment Ageing for Nuclear Power Plants (AEA)” project
started in 2008. One of its purposes is the re-evaluation of the mission time required for cables to
maintain their functions during the post-LOCA period. The period for BWR is 100 days and for PWR
one year.
In Spain there are six operating NPP, four PWR and two BWR, but all of them present specific
differences in their designs. Therefore, the required qualification profiles (temperature/time and
pressure/time) are different and plant-specific. Selected examples are given below:
• CN Vandellos II PWR. Combined LOCA + MSLB qualification profile. Post-LOCA period of
120 days with temperature decaying from 300°F to 140°F.
• CN Santa Maria de Garoña BWR. LOCA qualification profile. Post-LOCA period of 400 days with
temperature decaying from 185°F to 101°F.
Conclusion
While it may not be possible to identify a fixed period for post-accident mission time for all reactor
designs, certain basic principles can be observed in arriving at that period. The primary basis for
environmental qualification is that the equipment has to perform its safety function in a harsh
environment where it is practically impossible to perform any equipment replacement or corrective
maintenance. Therefore, the minimum duration for qualification is the time that is needed for
accessing the area when the risk is relatively low and the environment is suitable for people to enter
and perform services with reasonable precautions. For most containments, this period is considered
to be a minimum of 180 days. Based on the worst-case design basis event, a plant-specific evaluation
is necessary to arrive at a post-accident mission time in each case. The containment size, reactor core
size, containment spray systems, clean-up systems and its effectiveness will determine the final
value for this duration.
Assessment of paper-oil insulated cables for life extension using double kink number
In Ukraine, cables with paper-oil insulation (BMI) have a specified service life term of 25 years. Further
life extension is accepted based on conditions of cable insulation and protective shields. Measurement
of mechanical characteristics of cable paper is one of the methods of cable condition assessment. It is
known that during the ageing process the degree of paper polymerisation decreases, the elongation at
break indicator and the number of double kink fall down. To define the degree of polymerisation it is
necessary to prepare a cellulose solution and to measure its viscosity.
The advantage of this method is that it requires only a small amount of paper sample. On the
other hand, high labour for the solution preparation and toxicity of solvents are the disadvantages.
Additionally, it is difficult to measure elongation at break because even at the initial condition the
ratio for a paper is only 2% in relation to polyethylene, at 300 to 500%.
The number of double kinks is a more convenient indicator for the technical condition monitoring
of the cables with paper-oil insulation. From one section of a cable with a length of about 0.2 m it is
possible to prepare 20 to 70 strips of a paper with the size 140 × 15 mm2. This number of samples is
enough for the reliable definition of the specified parameter. The samples of cables for laboratory
researches are selected during repair.
Characteristics of cable paper in initial condition are specified in the standard documentation.
The breaking effort of strips of the specified size should make at least 7-13.5 kg (depending on a
thickness of paper type К080-К120), relative elongation at break – 2%, number of double kinks – at
least 2 000, irrespective of a paper thickness.
• The effect of the particular adverse environment conditions (high radiation, humidity and
temperature), especially during and after a design basis event (DBE).
• Extending the plant life after 40 years involves the requirement to assess and qualify the cable
conditions for a longer time.
• Many cable condition monitoring techniques do exist today, but none of them are considered
accurate and reliable enough for all the cable materials and types in use at their installed
applications. In addition to that, only few of them are non-destructive techniques and are
applicable in situ.
• Accelerated ageing techniques, for qualification purposes under DBE conditions, are often not
conservative and should be complemented with reliable condition monitoring methods.
The United States White House National Science and Technology Council Committee on
Technology issued a report in 2000 [19] in which safety issues on wire systems were addressed. The
conclusions of this report are important to understand the weak points of the current status and
which topics should be addressed in future research. The recommendations of the Committee can be
summarised as follows:
• increase co-operation between industry and research institutes, also internationally;
• improve design and functionality of wire systems;
• develop advanced wire system techniques including condition monitoring.
Research efforts from the IAEA [20] and the OECD NEA [21] led to similar conclusions.
In the United States, the NRC published in May 2003 a Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) [22],
wherein it reported the conclusions of qualification tests on I&C cables. Here a particular concern was
posed on cables status assessment needs when extending the plant life and the need to have reliable
qualification methods for LOCA and post-LOCA conditions. Basically, the NRC concluded that current
I&C wire system qualification methods provide a high level of confidence that the installed cables will
perform adequately during a design basis event, as required by 10 CFR 50.49. However, some LOCA
test failures indicate that under certain conditions, the accepted conservatisms in the qualification
tests is less than expected. Moreover, no single monitoring technique was found to be adequate to
reliably detect I&C cable failures. Two recommendations are significant, among others:
• Environment conditions should be monitored during plant operation, to ensure that they do
not exceed those applied for the qualification tests.
• A combination of condition monitoring techniques is suggested, to overcome the limits
existing in each single method.
In Japan, all cables installed in NPP are inspected periodically and the acceptance criteria for
respective techniques are shown in Table 3.3.2.2-2. However, these acceptance criteria cannot be used
for the evaluation of integrity in the DBE environment.
Cable
Insulation Visual Current leak
inspection Potential decay Tangent delta
resistance inspection rate testing
method
Cable type All cable types All cable types Power Power Power
except for fibre except for fibre
optic. optic.
Rated voltage No limitation No limitation 6 600 or 7 000 V 6 600 or 7 000 V 6 600 or 7 000 V
Operating voltage No limitation No limitation 6 600 or 6 900 V 6 600 or 6 900 V 6 600 or 6 900 V
Insulation No limitation No limitation No limitation No limitation No limitation
material
Assumed ageing Insulation Physical damage, Water tree Water tree Water tree
mechanisms resistance thermal ageing, degradation degradation degradation
degradation etc.
caused by thermal
and radiation
ageing
Industry standard JIS C 3005*1 No standard Technical No standard JIS C 3005*1
document 116C,
Maintenance
Guideline for CV
Cable for Medium
Voltage,
Dec. 2007,
Japan Electric
Wire & Cable
Makers'
Association
Details of test 1) Disconnected Colour change of With a DC-voltage The discharge AC 3.8 kV is
from power an insulator/jacket generator, DC time after DC applied between
source. is checked voltage is applied charging is each conductor
2) Keep connected visually between each measured by and shield layer,
with load or conductor and special devise and the tangent
disconnected shield layer, and delta is measured
with load. the temporal by the Schering
3) Voltage for response of bridge method
megger testing: leakage current is
1 000 V megger measured
for power cable
(6 600 or
7 000 V)
500 V megger
for power cable
(600 V)
Management Case by case, None e.g. 6.6 kV cable: e.g. 6 kV cable: e.g. 6.6 kV cable:
criteria e.g. power circuit > < 1 × 10–7 A applied voltage < 0.1% (at 3.8 kV)
5 M ohms, control (at 5 kV, 10 min.) 5.0 kV,
circuit > 2 M ohms judged voltage:
4.0 kV,
decay time:
> 230 sec.
Additional Carried out once Quantitative Carried out to Carried out to Carried out to
information during a 1 to ageing examine the water examine the examine the
6 time periodical assessment tree for power water tree for water tree for the
inspections cannot be cables installed power cables power cable
performed outdoors once installed installed outdoors
every 4 to 6 times outdoors once once every 4 to 6
periodical every 4 to 6 times periodical
inspections times periodical inspections
inspections
• The data of the reference specimen deposit shall be recorded in the register of cable reference
specimens of the plant.
• The reference specimens were deposited in the 1000 WWER plant in the containment, turbine
room and reactor containment in accordance with this programme.
Programme activities
The programme is based on the comparison of mechanical and electrical test results, applied on two
sets of identical cable samples: i) naturally aged cables located in selected plant areas (cable deposit)
and aged during plant operation; ii) new cables existing in plant stores and later artificially aged in
laboratory. Both sets of cable samples are aged to the same time intervals: 5, 10, 15, 20…40 years. The
programme includes the following basic activities:
• Cable sample selection. Thirteen different cable types (existing in plant stores) were selected, as
a representative sample of the cable population in the plant. For each sample, two pieces
34 meters long were selected and insulation-resistance base line tests values were obtained.
• Cable deposit area selection. The following plant areas were selected to install cable samples for
naturally ageing:
– Area 1. Reactor containment, near AFW turbine-pump, with the following design normal
operation conditions (dose values corresponding to 40 years): 49°C, 10 Mrad, 95% humidity.
– Area 2. Reactor containment, near containment liner: 49°C, 0.3 Mrad, 95% humidity.
– Area 3. Reactor containment, near a steam generator: 49°C, 10 Mrad, 95% humidity.
– Area 4. Auxiliary building: 40°C, 0.1 Mrad, 80% humidity.
• Environmental monitoring of deposited cable samples. Cable samples in each area were installed
(de-energised) in cable trays, together with the existing operational cables.
– Temperature monitoring in each area is performed using specific thermocouples, (one per
tray) located near cable trays. Measured values are sent outside reactor containment and
registered weekly.
– Radiation monitoring is performed using specific “high-temperature designed TLDs” (one
per area). Dose accumulated values are measured and registered yearly.
– Humidity is measured continuously inside containment, using the existing design plant
devices. Values inside the auxiliary building were taken weekly using portable devices.
– Sequentially, groups of all the naturally aged cable samples are extracted every five-year
period.
• Simulated cable-ageing process. Cable samples selected for artificial ageing simulation (previously
stored under controlled environment), were subjected to radiation and thermal ageing test,
simulating expected degradation in the programme time intervals (5, 10, 15,…, 40 years).
• Post-ageing tests. The following tests are applied to the different groups of artificially and
naturally aged cable samples (5, 10, 15,…, 40 years):
– Electrical tests: insulation resistance and polarisation index.
– Mechanical tests: elongation at break and tensile strength.
– High potential tests: each cable sample was subjected to the post-LOCA test required by
IEEE Std. 383-74.
• Programme results evaluation. For each cable sample, the results of the above tests are
registered and plotted in graphics, to be compared for the two groups of cables (naturally and
artificially aged). Evaluation of the programme results is performed every five years by the
plant staff. Presently (2010) the programme is still ongoing but already there are some
evaluation data (plant property), referring to the 5, 10, 15 and 20 years of cable-ageing groups.
As a preliminary conclusion, the plant has informed CSN that after 20 years, most of the
naturally aged cables seem to be less degraded than the corresponding artificially aged cables.
The operators provided information for 269 cable failures, of which 125 occurred while the cable
was in service. Operators reported 114 instances of cables failing to meet testing and inspection
acceptance criteria (referred to as “testing failures” in this report). These include cables that did not
fail while in service and cables that failed visual inspections. Operators reported 30 cable failures that
the NRC could not conclusively infer from the responses as being in-service or testing failures.
Of the 269 cable failures reported by the operators, 209 cables were normally energised, and
15 cables were normally de-energised. The operators did not supply this information for 45 cables.
Of the failures, 93% (209 of 224) occurred on normally energised cables. Of the 15 normally de-energised
cable failures, 3 failures were identified while the cables were in service and 10 were identified during
testing; operators did not indicate this information for 2 of the normally de-energised cable failures.
Of the 15 normally de-energised cable failures, the root causes included water/moisture, manufacturing
defects, installation error and digs. The operators listed water or moisture as a contributing or root
cause for 4 of the 15 normally de-energised cables, and 3 of these 4 failures were of 480 V (service)/
600 V (rated) cables.
It was noted that the majority of failures occurred on normally energised cables. Testing identified
66.7% of the normally de-energised cable failures, and water/moisture was a contributing factor to the
failures of some de-energised cables.
In Japan, four cable failure events have occurred since 1970, three of which were caused by initial
flaws or defects given in cable installation processes.
14
12
Number of failures
10
0
1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
Year of failure
Figure 3.3.3-2: Cables that failed to meet testing and inspection acceptance criteria
14
12
Number of failures
10
0
1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
Year of failure
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40
Year in service
80
60 59
40
20 17
1 2
0
BTYL EPR Kapton PVC XLPE
Insulation type
Figure 3.3.3-5: Causes and causal factors for all cable failures
70
60
Occurrences in GL responses
40
30
20
10
In Ukraine, the analysis of cables defects was performed using the data received for the period
1984-2008. For the AASHv cables three types of failures were identified:
• The failure occurred as the result of contact of the cut part of the cable and the sharp corner
of metalware. Failure is caused by an error in the cable laying connecting cells KRU-6kV.
• The failure was the result of the power cable damage during earth excavations.
• The failure was the result of short circuit of the cable conductor and the jacket of the power
cable at a bending point of the cable. Two failures of PvSG cable were registered.
The failure occurred as the result of the cable mechanical damage (breaks, dents, cuts) during the
construction. For cable KVVG three failures were registered:
• The failure was the consequence of rubbing against control cable laid between control panels.
• The failure was the result of mechanical damage of a cable during repair of fire-resistant
partitions.
• The failure was the result of short circuit which occurred because of rubbing against an
operating valve.
The reasons of failures:
• errors in cables installation;
• errors at cable routes and channels installation;
• degradation of cable insulation caused by the wrong cable application;
• mechanical damage of a cable during work not relevant to cable operation;
• change of cables’ electric characteristics (decrease in insulation resistance) caused by
insulation ageing.
A few other countries reported cable failures that had root causes as listed in Table 3.3.3-1..
Cable Number of
Root cause
type events
Mechanical ageing. The cables were connected to a running motor. Due to vibrations
Power 20
coming from the motor, the cables wore out on edges.
Poor quality cable. The manufacturer did not use the same material as was used in the
1 batch
Power qualification programme. Moreover, not all technological conditions were maintained
(some km)
during the manufacturing. After one year at 60°C the cable sheath cracked.
Poor quality of the whole batch. Some cables from this batch were installed. No failure,
1 batch
Signal but extremely low insulation resistance measured soon after installation. All cables
(some km)
were immediately changed.
During the cable installation, the workers pulled a cable with very high force. The cable
Power crossed another power cable. At the crossing, the cable insulation wore out. Two years 1
later, this position had a short circuit.
Very low insulation resistance was measured. It was a cable in the middle of a cable
Power bundle and under a fire protective layer. After cutting out, it appeared that the cable 5
was extremely brittle.
During the visual inspection some cables with cracked sheath were found. Conditions:
Power,
20 years in operation, 60°C, 0.001 Gy/h, PVC cable. Cracking due to loss of plasticiser. 10
signal
No loss of functionality, but such cables were replaced as needed following LOCA.
Other topics
In Europe, the international standards normally used, in addition to IEEE-323 is IEC-780 [26] and
IEC-60780 [27]. For the effects of radiation on insulation materials, common guidelines are IEC-544 [28]
and IEC-1244. France and Germany have developed their own national standards, i.e. RCC-E and RCC-M
(France) and KTA 3706 (Germany) [29]. In Sweden, the Swedish utilities have developed their own
guidelines, KBE EP-154 [30]. These standards include procedures using accelerated ageing to assess cable
capability to survive the environmental conditions existing in a power plant during and after a DBE.
In most areas within a nuclear power plant, the actual ambient temperature, pressure and
humidity is lower than that used for the cable qualification, providing a high degree of confidence
during the expected 40 years of plant life. In many countries it is then assumed that the qualification
process (especially for I&C cables) provides a reasonable assurance that the cables will perform the
intended safety-related function during the qualified life. In consequence, ageing assessment
requirements can be summarised as follows:
• Accuracy and limitations of accelerated ageing mechanisms utilised for the qualification. The
issue is to evaluate to what extent the ageing mechanisms can be simulated by models and
tests. It is normally assumed that thermal ageing in polymer materials can be modelled using
the Arrhenius equation (explained in the next paragraph) and that the thermal effect due to
long exposure to working environment conditions can be achieved in a much shorter time
frame for testing (accelerated ageing).
• Life extension. It is normally assumed that the difference between the real operating
environment and the original qualification environment (worse) can justify the requalification
for the extended period, usually 20 years, by reanalysis [22]. However, some LOCA tests
performed at Wyle Labs [31] showed that most cables aged 60 years (accelerated ageing) during
LOCA tests exhibited high leakage currents and failures. These results suggest that monitoring
of environmental conditions and methods to assess cable conditions are needed to improve
confidence during the extended plant life. Moreover, the new generation of plants and the
digital upgrades to the existing designs are increasingly less tolerant of leakage currents.
The considerations above suggest that some requalification process or update might be needed
under specific circumstances. However, plant license renewal is only one of the reasons that could
require actions in this direction. Recently [32], a list of cases where an installed component needs to
be updated regarding its qualification for long-term effects of ageing conditions was presented. This
list can be summarised as follows:
• The environment conditions deviate from those used in the qualification. As specified above,
this requires environment condition monitoring procedures during the whole qualified life.
An important aspect of this case is the consideration of “hot spots”, defined as points where
temperature and/or dose rate are higher than what was assumed in the early qualifications
tests.
• Reconsideration of the previously assessed qualified life, due to the use of non-conservative
factors such as very high acceleration factors for ageing, depletion of oxygen in the LOCA test
chambers in the early hours of the test or lack of adequate consideration of dose rate effects.
• New knowledge in the field in consideration of the long qualification period (40 or 60 years).
• The end of the qualified period is approaching.
• Installed life is longer than previously expected. Reanalysis of an ageing evaluation to extend
the qualification life of a component is performed routinely in the context of an EQ programme.
In the US, the licensing basis for environmental qualification is 10 CFR 50.49, “Environmental
Qualification of Electrical Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants”. A Regulatory
Guide (RG) 1.89 “Environmental Qualification of Certain Electric Equipment Important to Safety for
Nuclear Power Plants” provides practical approaches to complying with the code requirement. The RG
endorses IEEE Std. 323, “Qualifying Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations” [23]
with certain exceptions. Further guidance is provided in the “Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental
Qualification of Class 1E Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors” or NUREG 588 “Interim Staff
Position on Environmental Qualification of Safety-related Electrical Equipment” for the plants that
were operating when this guidance was issued. All the new plants are required to fully comply with
10 CFR 50.49.
The IEEE standard provides a recommended procedure for conducting the qualification test.
A further caution is given to confirm that the selected procedure is conservative for the particular
materials that are under test. Figure 3.3.4-1 is taken from IEEE 323 to indicate the development of a test
profile with adequate consideration for margin and extended period for post-accident service period.
The 2003 version of IEEE 323 does not have the pressure and temperature curve given below. The
standard directs the use of plant-specific profiles with suggested margins for qualification tests.
Figure 3.3.4-2 shows the predicted accident profile for a plant in Korea. The qualification test
profile has to envelope the worst case environment with recommended margins.
Tables 3.3.4-1 and 3.3.4-2 show the test profile of accident pressure and temperature for a plant
in Germany.
Figure 3.3.4-2: DBE temperature profile of inside containment for a plant in Korea
400
350
300 o
( 286 F)
Temper at ur e ( F)
o
250
o
( 250 F)
200
o
( 30 days, 166 F)
150
o
( 0 sec, 120 F)
100
1. E- 01 1. E+00 1. E+01 1. E+02 1. E+03 1. E+04 1. E+05 1. E+06 1. E+07 1. E+08
Ti me ( seconds)
Peak
Test profile location Peak Peak duration
increase time
Test profile of devices in the valve compartment of a
1 750-2 000 mbar ~1 s ~4 s
1 300 MW (electric) type PWR light water reactor
Test profile of devices in the annulus (within the region of the
break compartment) of a 1 300 MW (electric) type PWR light 100-120 mbar ~100 s ~200 s
water reactor
Test profile of devices in the annulus (outside the region of the
break compartment) of a 1 300 MW (electric) type PWR light 100-120 mbar ~100 s ~100 s
water reactor
Input from several countries has introduced several experiences that challenge the early
approaches to qualifying electrical cables using accelerated ageing. The areas of new insight include:
the influence of oxygen content in LOCA chamber, variation in activation energy, the influence of
dose rate in ageing and the procedure for accelerated ageing.
New insights are reported from Japan on activation energy and the procedure for accelerated
ageing in the environmental qualification tests.
Based on the above, the principles of calculation and application for the activation energy used
for future assessment as shown below were determined to be appropriate.
• Applicable region of activation energy calculated by thermal ageing tests is limited up to the
minimum temperature in thermal ageing tests. However, when the calculated activation
energy is less than 62.8 kJ/mol (15 kcal/mol) the value can be applied up to the operating
temperature region of actual operating plants.
• Activation energy in the region between the minimum temperature in thermal ageing tests
and the temperature of actual operating plants are evaluated from the investigation results of
ageing in actual operating plants (sampling inspection) and thermal ageing characteristics at
the minimum temperature in thermal ageing tests.
• When activation energy cannot be evaluated from the investigation results of ageing in actual
operating plants, 62.8 kJ/mol (15 kcal/mol) is used as a tentative value for the activation
energy in the region between the minimum temperature in thermal ageing tests and the
temperature of actual operating plants.
Radiation monitoring
The dose rate distribution is measured with the aid of Alanine dosimeters. The selected location has
been fitted with hermetically sealed dosimeters from Bruker Company, Germany, all in the form of
small cylinders with a diameter and height of 5 mm. The dosimeters are evaluated in the laboratory
using electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy. Since the irradiation temperature influences the
ESR response of Alanine dosimeters, the true absorbed dose is calculated from the measured dose by
using the temperature coefficient. The dose rate is calculated from the known irradiation time.
Fluency of neutrons
The fluency of thermal and fast neutrons is measured using cobalt and nickel foils, respectively. The
evaluation of these dosimeters consists in measuring their induced activity after neutron irradiation.
At some locations the temperature exceeded the projected calculations. The dose rates at all
locations were markedly lower than what was projected.
In 2007, according to the recent “Life Extension Application” of this plant, CSN required an
analysis of the existent temperature data in the different drywell elevations corresponding to a
20-year period (1986-2007). For each elevation, the following medium-temperature values during the
period were estimated, considering conservative margins:
• Elevation 514: 42°C.
• Elevation 520: 57°C.
• Elevation 525: 65°C.
• Elevation 536: 66°C.
The maximum cable operating temperature was established at 65°C. According to the above
temperature values, a “Time Limited Ageing Analysis” was performed for all qualified equipment and
cables existing inside the drywell.
Service life time assessment based on environmental monitoring in the Czech Republic
Accelerated testing methods used during the qualification may not be enough to simulate operational
cable ageing. Moreover, the cables in containment age at different rates based on their location. For
example, the temperature and the dose rate may vary within the containment from 25 to 70°C and/or
from 0 to 0.5 Gy/h, respectively. As the cables age in different locations at different rates, the service
life can vary. Hence, it is necessary to know the temperature and the dose (dose rate) to ensure the
qualification of polymeric materials. Representative cable samples are aged at different temperatures,
at different dose rates and/or are simultaneously irradiated at elevated temperature. Functional
properties were measured.
The results are transformed into the mathematical equations that convert the rate of degradation
at different conditions (temperature, dose rate) with ageing time. The equations exist for all 1E cable
types, sheath as well as insulation and this approach helps to extend cable life based on actual
temperature and radiation doses.
The rate of degradation in individual locations in a NPP depends on the surrounding temperature
and on the dose rate. To assess the service life time in individual locations more easily, a special
software system has been developed. The input parameters are the following:
• equations describing the rate of degradation at specific conditions;
• information on the temperature and dose rate in individual locations in NPP;
• information on cables: type, trace (room, location, etc.), qualification.
The output is:
• the cable service life time in individual locations;
• much more additional information like temperature distribution and dose rate along the cable
trace, connected device, etc.
been found necessary for testing certain materials particularly sensitive to the dose rate [20]. It is
important to note that the use of such insulation materials in radiation environments where the
effects of dose rate at high dose rate exposure may not be an indication of ageing experience in a low
dose environment for material irradiated to a common dose. Therefore, materials “qualified” for a
40-year service life may fail sooner than expected [34].
In one Spanish BWR plant, built in the 60s (operation permit in 1971), many originally installed
cables supplied by General Electric were not qualified for functioning under accident conditions.
In 1983, the plant was required by CSN to develop a Safety Evaluation Plan (SEP). According to the SEP,
an Equipment Environmental Qualification Programme, following NRC IE-Bulletin 79-01-B (DOR
Guidelines), was required for cables and equipments. As a consequence of the SEP, in 1985 the plant
replaced power and control cables in safety-related equipment located inside the drywell (RV, SRV, MSIV,
MOV, thermocouples, etc.). About 140 cables, with lengths varying from 10 to 150 meters, were replaced.
New cables from Spanish manufacturers Pirelli (EPDM, EPR and Afumex insulation) and Saenger
(EPR insulation) were qualified according to IEEE-383-74 and installed inside the drywell. Afterwards, a
CSN inspection (2002) on the plant EQ programme, found that many power and control cables located
inside the steam tunnel and reactor building were not properly qualified (lack of documentation)
according to 10 CFR 50.49 requirements. Following a specific assessment of the issue, 34 cables inside
the steam tunnel and 122 cables inside the reactor and turbine building were replaced in 2003 and
2005, respectively. New Pirelli (EPR and Afumex insulation) and Saenger (EPR insulation) cables,
qualified according to IEEE-383-74 were installed.
In another Spanish BWR plant, original cables installed in the plant were qualified according to
IEEE-383-74 requirements. As result of maintenance activities on MOV, in 1994 and 1995 plant
personnel found degradation (burned and cracked jackets) in some Pirelli EPR/CSPE, control and power
cables feeding MOV (Limitorque actuators). Subsequent cable failures occurred in 1996, 2000 and 2002
resulted in three safety-related MOV failures.
A further plant evaluation in 2005 determined that temperature hot spots inside the reactor
building and steam tunnel could have been the cause of the cable degradation. As a consequence, the
plant decided to replace all Pirelli EPR cables in 39 MOV located in high-temperature areas. A plant
design modification was applied to a total of 176 actuators (1E, non-1E) including those located in
high-temperature areas. Intermediate connection boxes were installed in cable routings, and control
and power cable portions, from box to actuator, were replaced with new Nucletef (ETFE insulation)
power and control cables. Quick connectors were also installed in some actuators. Cable replacement
began during a 1997 outage and will be probably be finished in 2012 outage.
In Canada, the PVC cables were replaced inside containment at Ontario Power Generation (OPG)
nuclear power plants for several reasons: The qualification of PVC for use in high-radiation fields was
a concern because OPG’s original qualification tests for PVC did not perform well for the bounding
environmental profiles, and a concern with regard to dose rate effects related to PVC cables.
In addition, some original manufacturers were out of business or had no detailed information needed
to demonstrate the environmental qualification of their cables. In light of these issues, a decision was
made to remove PVC insulated cables from qualified applications inside containment. At that time,
OPG owned most of the nuclear power plants in Canada.
Currently, Gentilly-2 (owned by Hydro-Québec), another Canadian nuclear power plant, is also
planning to replace PVC cables inside containment based on similar reasons to those encountered by
OPG. For instance, even though a few of the PVC cables successfully passed one of the simulated
design basis events (DBE), such as main stream line break (MSLB), they did not pass the loss of coolant
accident (LOCA). Thus, these cables will not perform their safety-related functions when exposed to
harsh environments resulting from a LOCA.
As this nuclear power plant is scheduled for refurbishment, a decision was made to replace the
PVC insulated cables inside containment by the end of refurbishment in 2012.
License condition
“The licensee shall have an environmental qualification programme in accordance with the
requirements of CSA Standard N290.13: Environmental Qualification of Equipment for CANDU Nuclear
Power Plants.”
Preamble
The purpose of this license condition is to ensure that all required systems, equipment, components,
protective barriers, and structures in a nuclear facility are qualified to perform their safety functions if
exposed to harsh environmental conditions resulting from credited design basis events (DBE) and that
this capability is preserved for the life of the plant.
The programme is applied to control cables (instrumentation, signal, block cables) with plastic
and rubber insulation, low- and medium-voltage cables with plastic and paper-oil insulation operating
in NPP. The programme requirements are obligatory for the ageing management of safety-related
cables, which are classified as 2nd and 3rd safety classes according to the “General Provisions for NPP
Safety” NP 306.2.141-2008.
The programme requirements can be used for the ageing management of the cables for systems
of normal operation (4th safety class). The programme specifies:
• procedures of ageing management activity;
• programme requirements for NPP ageing management for specific plants;
• programme requirements for cable technical condition inspection;
• requirements and principles of cable lists compiled for the inspection of cable technical
condition in order to define the possibility of lifetime extension;
• procedures of cable environment condition monitoring and identification of hot spots;
• methods of cable technical condition assessment;
• requirements to cable technical condition inspection for the purpose of the cable lifetime
extension;
• the requirements to cable database and content of cable data for the integration into general
cable database;
• registration of cable ageing management works;
• content of scientific and technical support activity and maintenance;
• quality assurance.
The requirements of the programme are obligatory for the implementation by the NPP staff and
management and the management of the national nuclear energy-generating company Energoatom
and specialised organisations involved in cable ageing management activity. The work on cable
ageing management is performed by the NPP personnel involved in the specialised organisation when
needed.
US records
In January 2010 USNRC published NUREG/CR-7000 “Essential Elements of an Electric Cable Condition
Monitoring Programme”. Table 3.3.9-1 of this publication provides an exhaustive listing of all cable
monitoring techniques, applicable cable categories and materials, applicable stressors, ageing
mechanisms detected, advantages and limitations.
• Ultrasonic degradation diagnostic method. The ultrasonic diagnostic method is the technology
developed by Mitsubishi Cable Industries, Ltd. as the degradation diagnostic technology for
insulation or jackets of the cables and to measure ultrasonic propagation velocity for axial
direction of materials as the non-destructive degradation diagnostic parameter. The diagnostic
equipment for low-voltage cables in NPP has been jointly developed by Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries, Ltd. and Mitsubishi Cable Industries, Ltd. The ultrasonic probes of this equipment
moves automatically by the sequential control to measure accuracy in a short time and to
decrease exposure dose of the operators.
• Optical diagnostic method. The optical diagnostic method has been developed by Hitachi, Ltd. as
a degradation diagnostic method for polymer materials used for the cables. The basic concept
of this method is the colour-change of polymer materials due to ageing are exposed to two
optical beams with different wavelengths and their absorption is quantitatively evaluated.
In the test, the difference of absorption for 405 nm and 1 310 nm were measured as a diagnosing
parameter.
• Surface hardness measuring method. The surface hardness measuring method is to press a
cylindrical needle against the surface of the object with a spring, and its compressed depth is
measured as a surface hardness in relative value. In the test, the device with a simplified
micro-hardness meter developed by Mitsubishi Cable Industries, Ltd. for rubber materials of
cable insulation was used.
Results of investigation
Correlation between the diagnostic data of the non-destructive methods listed above and elongation at
break were obtained by round robin tests. A summary of the results is shown in Table 3.3.9-2. Based on
the result, the applicability of the methods to cables installed in operating NPP was evaluated as follows:
• The indenter is applicable to the EPR family, SIR, SHPVC and certain kinds of XLPE.
• Though the ultrasonic degradation diagnostic technology is applicable to the EPR family, an
improvement is needed as the result showed a somewhat large dispersion.
• Though the optical diagnostic method is applicable to white colour insulation of the XLPE and
EPR families, an improvement is needed as the result showed a somewhat large dispersion.
• Though the surface hardness measuring method is applicable to the EPR family and SIR, an
improvement is needed as the result showed a somewhat large dispersion.
measured and compared to trending data from accelerated laboratory ageing. These tests are useful
when the surface of the cable is accessible or the insulator can be evaluated at the terminations. They
cannot be used for cable contained in a conduit unless the cable is pulled out.
The advent of LIRA has provided a means to detect thermal and radiation damage to cables
because it can detect small changes in electrical properties of insulator materials on the order of 1 pf.
This detection level allows localised and bulk thermal ageing to be identified well before the material
has aged to the point of cracking or powdering. The tests described here indicate that LIRA can
identify damage below the point where a cable can no longer pass a LOCA test. The results also
indicate that trending of the severity of damage is possible if LIRA tests are performed periodically.
The results indicate that LIRA may be used to assess the condition of cable circuits that traverse
multiple rooms with different environmental conditions and circuits with intermediate termination
points such as splices and terminal blocks. LIRA will also be a useful troubleshooting tool if there is a
concern that significant installation damage has occurred. The tests proved that LIRA can identify
cuts and gouges in the insulation system as well as identify thermal or radiation damage. While this
research used 30.5 m (100 ft) cables, other assessments performed by IFE have evaluated much longer
cables and in one case a 128 km (~78 mile) undersea cable.
LIRA presents a significant addition to the tools available to evaluate cable condition and ageing.
Because the system allows the location of the adverse condition to be identified, the position of the
hot spot along the length of a cable circuit can be reviewed to determine if a heat or radiation source
is present or if another damage type is present in the cable. Conversely, if a heat source is identified
adjacent to a conduit system, LIRA may be used to determine if significant damage has occurred
adjacent to the heat or radiation source.
Conclusion
The tests at EPRI in November 2006 showed that LIRA could identify localised thermal damage to
insulator that had not progressed to the point where the insulation had totally failed. LIRA could
locate the damage even though the insulation could still function adequately under normal and
accident conditions. These tests indicated that LIRA could identify ageing before the end of the
qualified life. The results indicate that LIRA will be useful in assessing the condition of cables located
in conduits that are suspected of having been subjected to localised thermal/radiation ageing.
Similarly, LIRA could be used to assess cables in trays that are difficult to access. The May 2006
EPRI tests indicate that LIRA can identify cuts and gouges to one or more conductors of multi-conductor
cables. In-plant tests or simulation thereof may be necessary to determine if cuts and gouges to a
single conductor can be identified under plant conditions.
An important issue is the assessment of the condition of installed cables that have been exposed
for a long time (more than 30 years) to relative high temperature and gamma radiation (the condition
of cables inside the reactor containment). Several techniques have been proposed to monitor and
identify cables that are close to the end of their qualified life. The purpose of this work was to evaluate
three well known techniques and finding the correlation among them. These techniques are the
elongation-at-break (EAB), the indenter and the line resonance analysis (LIRA). The first one is the
reference technique, for which a limit of 50% absolute was set by several international standards. The
indenter is a local technique that has produced good results, mainly with EPR insulated cables. LIRA is
an emerging technique based on the evaluation of electrical properties and their trends with the
ageing conditions.
The cables tested are low-voltage, EPDM insulated cables produced by the Swedish Lipalon. The
reason for this choice is that this type of cable is widely in use in all the Swedish nuclear power plants.
Samples 5 m long of three Lipalon cable types were globally aged artificially for different times and
their condition was analysed using the three methods mentioned above. This report describes the
findings and results if this analysis.
In this report, three techniques for cable global ageing assessment were tested and evaluated.
The EAB technique is a destructive, local technique that is often used as a reference for other methods.
The indenter is a local, in situ mechanical technique that is currently quite often used in NPP. LIRA can
be an electrical method, full line, in situ. LIRA correlated quite well with EAB and both tend to flatten
when the ageing time reaches 40 years. The only cable type that was difficult to assess for all three
methods was the medium type in an air environment.
These tests considered only thermal ageing up to 50 years and should be completed by also
considering gamma irradiation ageing. This work was performed with the financial support of Nordic
Nuclear Safety Research (NKS), Ringhals AB and Forsmark AB. The cable samples used in these tests
were supplied by Ringhals AB.
Figure 3.3.9-2: Identification of a mechanical damage spot (LIRA, EPRI experiment, 2007)
F igure 3.3.9-3: Identific ation of a thermal hot s pot in a low voltage c able (L IR A, E P R I experiment, 2007)
Partial discharge influence leads to occurrence of short current impulses in an external electric
chain (lasting less than 1 microsecond) and to charge (q) transfer. This charge is called “seeming” and
could be measured. Admissible level of seeming charge at the testing of new paper-oil insulated
cables makes q ≤ (10 – 20) • 10-12 coulomb = from 10 picocoulomb to 20 picocoulomb and is defined by
comparison of an actual cable resource to the initial level of partial discharges measured in a new
product. For cables with PE insulation this level is essentially lower – from 2 to 5 picocoulomb, since
polymeric insulation is less resistant to the influence of partial discharges than paper-oil insulation.
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
4.1 Introduction
The objective of this internationally co-ordinated project is to share the corporate knowledge and
operating experience to understand the failure mechanisms and identify effective techniques and
technologies to effectively manage and mitigate active degradation in nuclear power plants.
The specific objectives of the project are to: i) establish a complete database with regard to major
ageing phenomena for SCC and degradation of cable insulation through collective efforts by NEA
members; ii) establish a knowledge base in these areas by compiling and evaluating the collected data
and information systematically; iii) perform an assessment of the data and identify the basis for
commendable practices which will help regulators and operators to enhance ageing management.
Commendable practices are derived from collected knowledge and experience as shown in
Figure 1.5-2. The SCAP database and knowledge bases provide the extensive information underlying
the commendable practices outlined in Sections 4.2 and 4.3. These, in turn, provide the technical and
organisational elements which can inform ageing management programmes in the areas of SCC and
cable ageing for safe long term operation. To use accumulated knowledge and a co-operative approach
is to help improve the efficiency and effectiveness of ageing management and safety of long-term
operation, so that it will be benefit for all stakeholders including designers, operators, regulators and
ultimately the public.
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
manufacturing and installation practices. When corrected or when the cable was replaced, the
problems were resolved. This information also forms part of the database and can be used to inform
future practices.
The insights collected in this project offer a greater level of knowledge of ageing mechanisms,
cable types and technical basis for addressing life extension and continued qualification of cables.
Besides the technical data and operating experience, the SCAP cable ageing data- and knowledge base
provide up-to-date information on environmental qualification of cables that need to remain functional
during and following a design basis event. The database incorporates information on recent research
results on ageing mechanisms and on continued efforts in enhancing condition-monitoring capability.
Countries regulate the long-term operation of their NPP in accordance with their legal and
regulatory frameworks. Information supporting AMP is of vital importance given that ageing
management is an essential and important aspect to be taken into consideration in connection with
safe long-term operation. The activities of both working groups, the databases generated and the
knowledge gained for SCC and degradation of cable insulation will be very valuable in this regard. The
commendable practices being outlined in this report demonstrate practices that enhance safety or
performance, and provide information on how to mitigate or avoid problems now known.
4.2 SCC
4.2.1 Introduction
Many stress corrosion cracking events have occurred in different structures, systems and components
of nuclear power plants as early as the 1970s and have continued to the present time. The causes of
these events were sensitisation of material by high heat input, local high residual stress, surface
finishing and hardness associated with certain environments (such as high-temperature water). For
these reasons, it is necessary to carry out maintenance activities, inspections, monitoring, preventive
maintenance/mitigation, repair/replacement and safety assessment to minimise the occurrence of
future events.
Therefore, knowledge should be extracted from the database (operational experience and recent
findings) by analysing and evaluating the data from the viewpoint of the implementation of appropriate
ageing management and maintenance activities beneficial to both regulators and operators.
To achieve this, a well grounded technical information basis (TIB) is needed for both the operator
and the regulator. The ageing management and maintenance activities for SCC are to be performed
taking into account ageing management from the early stage of nuclear power plant operation for the
safe long-term operation of the plant.
In many countries comprehensive ageing management activities are now included from the early
stages of plant operation and are reviewed regularly both through routine supervision and as part of
the Periodic Safety Review (normally every ten years). Some countries perform a first extensive review
in connection with the Periodic Safety Review associated with 30 years operation and others as part of
the license renewal process.
As shown in Figure 2.1-1, it is first necessary to define an ageing management programme (AMP)
for the counter measure regarding SCC by selecting the structures, systems and components (SSC),
determining the safety important specific SCC mechanisms, and determining the criteria for evaluating
that the intended safety function of the SSC are maintained. It is necessary to perform evaluation
consistent with the long-term operation (e.g. 40 or 60 years), and to include the evaluation results in a
preventive maintenance plan.
In order to perform optimal preventive maintenance for SCC, utilities should establish a long-term
maintenance management plan. For safe long-term operation a well-grounded TIB is needed for each
of the SCC mechanisms. To construct the TIB, comprehensive activities, including research and
development, establishment of codes and standards, and consolidation of maintenance activities
(PDCA), need to be continuously reviewed.
There are several factors which may hinder effective ageing management and may lead to either
unexpected or premature ageing. These factors or weaknesses need to be identified and addressed in
a proactive approach involving experts.
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
As shown in Figure 1.5-1 and Table 2.1-1, effective ageing management for SCC throughout the
service life requires the use of a systematic approach to manage ageing. It is helpful to use the basic
idea of a framework for co-ordinating all ageing management programmes and activities based on the
understanding of preventive maintenance, mitigation, repair and replacement, inspection/monitoring/
qualification, safety assessment, and research and development on the ageing mechanisms and/or
ageing effects of the SSC.
As described in Section 1.5, the IAEA Safety Standard Series No. NS-G-2.12 “Ageing Management
for Nuclear Power Plants” explains how to extract and identify commendable practices appropriate for
ageing management programmes (AMP) for SCC.
The guide describes nine generic attributes of an effective ageing management programme:
scope of the ageing management programme, preventative actions to minimise control and ageing
mechanisms, detection of ageing effects, monitoring and trending of ageing effects, mitigation of
ageing effects, acceptance criteria, corrective actions, operating experience feedback and feedback of
research and development, and quality management.
It is also important to establish the TIB to identify commendable practices from the knowledge
base data which should contain international harmonisation of at least the following five items,
excluding quality management which is not within the scope of SCAP:
• inspection/monitoring/qualification;
• preventive maintenance/mitigation;
• repair/replacement;
• safety assessment (flaw evaluation/fracture);
• R&D (initiation/crack growth/fracture).
As an example the Japanese approach to the ageing management of stress corrosion cracking for
safe long-term operation is presented in Appendix 1.
4.2.2 Inspection/monitoring/qualification
Inspection and qualification
The locations and components to be inspected should be chosen on the basis of their susceptibility to
the various types of stress corrosion cracking. This should be based upon a systematic analysis of the
plant SSC. The choice of components and methods in the inspection programme can be affected by
exposure to irradiation of the inspection personnel, for example visual techniques such as underwater
cameras should be used for reactor vessel internals, and other mechanised methods developed for
other components. When setting up an inspection programme, the initiation times should be taken
into account. For example PWSCC under normal chemistry conditions and IASCC have been found to
have much longer initiation times than IGSCC and ECSCC.
The inspection interval and technique used depends upon the type of stress corrosion cracking to
be detected. The inspection interval should be related to the propagation rate of the cracking to be
detected and the probability of detection using the inspection performance qualification. The inspection
interval should be revised periodically, in particular if a defect is found and left in place during
continued operation, or if suitable methods are available to monitor the crack propagation.
Inspection techniques should be qualified for the purpose in accordance with the applicable
regulations, codes and standards. The applied process should be qualified (procedure, equipment and
personnel) using real SCC or, if this is not possible, artificial defects (ex. EDM notch).
Different inspection methods can be qualified for detection and/or sizing the defect. In some cases,
one method is used to detect a crack and a second method to size a defect. For some SCC degradation
mechanisms a surface examination is sufficient, and for others volumetric methods must be used.
It should also be noted that the crack morphology is mechanism-dependent. For example, PWSCC
cracks are much tighter than the more oxide filled IGSCC in BWR, and this should be considered in the
qualification procedure. In order to provide reliable input data for safety assessments of cracked
components, both the probability of detection and the accuracy of the sizing method must be known.
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
As plants become older, it will be necessary to revise and expand the inspection programmes.
There needs to be continuous development of new monitoring and inspection techniques. Improved
understanding of some of the degradation mechanisms not fully understood today will aid in the
identification of new mitigation possibilities.
Monitoring
Several chemical parameters that can affect the initiation or propagation of stress corrosion cracking
such as harmful impurities should be monitored on a regular basis and should be included in plants’
chemistry programmes. Many of these measurements are now performed on-line so that monitoring
is carried out on a continuous basis. Some specific monitors have been developed, such as electrodes
to measure the electrochemical corrosion potential (ECP) in situ in BWR to determine if sufficient
hydrogen is being dosed to the system. The cleanliness of stainless steel surfaces should be monitored
regularly to ensure that the prescribed levels are maintained and eliminate the initiation of ECSCC.
Since there is susceptibility fluence for IASCC which depends on the stress level of the component
the fluence levels of vessel internal components should be monitored, and/or calculated, so that
inspection and maintenance can be carried out in a timely manner. The cumulative damage in
materials and changes in stress, including radiation creep and swelling in PWR, should also be taken
into consideration.
Once a crack has been detected and is left in place during continued operation some countries
permit that it be monitored directly or indirectly. Direct in situ monitoring techniques are not yet being
used other than in an experimental or verification manner. Some advanced inspection/monitoring
techniques could become available, but need further development. There are a number of established
methods for leak detection. In many countries leak detection is not an approved method of detection,
but can be considered to be part of the defence in depth.
Material
It should be noted that it is important to eliminate at least one of the factors to prevent SCC. In terms
of prevention, the choice of material is important and is one of the key factors. Since the first plants
were built, new materials have been designed in an attempt to eliminate some of the causes of
cracking based on the experience of stress corrosion cracking events.
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
Figure 4.2.3-1: Example of a maintenance plan for ageing due to stress corrosion cracking
To prevent stress corrosion cracking in BWR components, low carbon grades of austenitic
stainless steel containing up to 0.03% carbon are selected as material while for PWR components,
even though carbon level control is not needed for weld metal and casting with duplex structures
according to Regulatory Guide 1.44, material with a carbon content ranging between 0.03% and 0.05%,
and weld metal with a maximum carbon content of 0.035%, and often a specified minimum ferrite
content weld metal and cast stainless steel (CASS) have demonstrated good operational experience
and are recommended.
The Alloy 600 series has successively been replaced by the less susceptible Alloy 690 series
because of its higher chromium content, in particular in PWR components. Care however is needed
when using its weld materials (Alloys 52 and 152) since they are prone to hot cracking. In the case of
IASCC, 316L stainless steel can be used in BWR since the susceptibility fluence has been found to be
higher than that of 304/304L stainless steels.
If reactor vessel internals are to be replaced as preventative maintenance it is worthy to note that
experience has shown that the susceptibility fluence for IASCC in BWR is higher for 316 than for
304 austenitic stainless steels. It is also advisable to avoid welds in the highest flux regions of the
components.
Stress
Stresses introduced during manufacture should be minimised to reduce the risk of SCC initiation. For
this purpose new welding procedures such as narrow gap and heat sink welding have been developed.
In the BWR reactor water environment, there have been many incidents in which cracks initiated
in the transgranular mode in the hardened layer due to the heavy machining, and have then grown in
the intergranular mode. It is therefore important that the surfaces of components do not contain high
tensile stresses and a number of methods (for example peening and polishing) have been developed to
ensure that the surface finish is acceptable in this respect free from cold work. Some of these methods
can also be applied to existing components to reduce residual stresses or introduce compressive
stresses, for example induction heating stress improvement and laser stress improvement processes.
When applying any of these techniques, it is recommended that a qualification process is followed,
and if appropriate, that the work be supervised by an independent third party. It is also important that
the component can be inspected as part of the ordinary inspection programme. Weld overlays and
MSIP are accepted as mitigation techniques in some countries.
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
In PWR, it is recommended that a parabolic-shaped radius be introduced for the head-shank curve
of baffle former bolts, in order to reduce the stress concentration factor compared to the circular curve.
Elongation of head-shank length is also effective to reduce the stress of the head-shank.
With regard to IASCC the threshold stress decreases as the dose increases. Stress improvement
surface finishing techniques can be applied during preventative maintenance. However it is necessary
to take into account irradiation-induced stress relaxation, creep and void swelling, when applying
stress improvement techniques to highly irradiated components.
Environment
Research on the root cause of IGSCC in BWR led to improved water chemistry and chemistry control
programmes with low levels of impurities measured indirectly by the conductivity of the water.
Lowering the electrochemical corrosion potential by the addition of hydrogen [hydrogen water
chemistry (HWC)] is a widely applied mitigation technique. Noble metal chemical addition (NMCA)
has also been applied in cases where cracks have been found in reactor vessel internals, such as core
shrouds, to increase the effectiveness of HWC in the more oxidising core environment.
Chloride contamination levels must be controlled to avoid ECSCC. It is also advisable to control
the cation contamination, and it can be noted that sodium is more benign than magnesium, zinc and
copper. The choice of non-chloride-containing marking pens and tapes is important and it should also
be noted that personnel are a major source of chloride contamination. Lubricants and gaskets should
not contain substances known to cause TGSCC. It is also important to pay attention to such things as
coversheets used for temporary storage on site, and also to dew condensation in the containment
during construction or maintenance and repair work, etc. (installation of an air dryer can alleviate this
problem).
In general reactor vessel internals are intended to be used for the entire plant lifetime and,
in consequence, will in particular in PWR be exposed to very high radiation doses, typically up to
100 displacements per atom (dpa), assuming 60 years operation. With such high radiation doses, the
material microstructure and mechanical properties can change considerably, which could have a
significant impact on the stress corrosion cracking susceptibility. Radiolysis is suppressed in PWR
by the addition of hydrogen. There are moves to reduce the amounts of hydrogen dosed and it is
recommended that this be considered with care with regard to the potential effect on IASCC and
PWSCC. Fuel management can affect the final dose of the material and may offer a method of
mitigating IASCC.
All the environmental conditions of SSC must be reviewed periodically with respect to normal,
local (crevice, two-phase) or accidental environment (polluted) conditions.
4.2.4 Repair/replacement
Many of the considerations for preventative maintenance and mitigation are applicable for repair and
replacement. The difference between these two concepts is that the latter is carried out after a crack
is detected and the former, as the name implies, is carried before a crack is found in order to prevent
stress corrosion cracking. When a component is to be replaced the concepts presented in Section 4.2.3
are applicable. This section will therefore concentrate on repair methods rather than replacement.
If the flaw detected does not meet the acceptance criteria in the safety assessment, the component
should be repaired or replaced in accordance with the regulations, codes and standards. When a repair/
replacement method that is not in accordance with the regulation standard is to be applied, the basis
for the validity of the structural integrity must be approved and verified.
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
Repair normally implies that the crack is removed. Care should in such cases be taken to ensure
that the crack tip does not remain in the component but is fully removed. If the crack is removed by
grinding, the surface finish should not result in unnecessary cold work or residual stresses which
could lead to initiation. Thus surface polishing can be applicable. If the crack is removed by electrode
discharge machining the choice of electrode and process parameters should prevent hot cracking of
the component surface. The surface condition should permit further inspection of the component.
Welding is another possible repair method. This can be applied after the crack has been removed
to restore the original dimensions and structural integrity to the component. In this case an inlay of
compatible material is introduced. A method acceptable in some countries is the weld overlay. In this
case additional weld material is applied to the outside of the component (nozzle or pipe) and the crack
may be left in place. Welding is also a central component in the half-nozzle repair technique which
has been applied in some cases of reactor vessel penetrations in which cracking has been detected.
Repair methods should normally be chosen so that the possibility of recurrence is minimised.
This can mean that the component is not repaired immediately after the crack has been evaluated,
but that the repair is performed after extensive planning and verification procedures and associated
safety assessments is carried out. It can therefore be cost-effective to develop repair techniques for
specific essential components in advance. It is recommended that repair techniques be qualified for
the specific application.
Regarding replacement, it is advisable to make a judgement taking into account the following
factors: comparison of merits and demerits of repair and replacement, feasibility study of replacement
in accordance with the original design or reflecting latest design, needs for technology development,
applied experience, the need for additional licensing procedures, access limitation during field work,
working environmental conditions (e.g. underwater), location, requirements of installation accuracy,
working period, personnel radiation dose, costs, requirements of inspection after replacement and so on.
Opportunities for modernisation should be taken to replace systems and components using
materials less susceptible to stress corrosion cracking with optimised weld configuration and welding
processes. When replacing systems and components, quality control is essential not least because of
the shortage of experienced workers, such as welders, in the nuclear field. The detail of on-site storage
of new components is important to ensure that they are not degraded prematurely, e.g. by ECSCC.
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
4.3 Cable
4.3.1 Introduction
Cables installed in nuclear power plants have the functions of transmitting instrument and control
signals and supplying power to electric components. Some of the cables are required to perform their
function under the condition of the design basis event and they are classified as Environmentally
Qualified (EQ) cables.
In general, the cables have been regarded as a maintenance-free component. However, cable
insulation performance will gradually decrease due to the surrounding environment such as heat,
radiation, moisture, etc. Therefore appropriate ageing management needs to be carried out from the
early stage of plant operation to prevent potential failure events.
The commendable practices for cable ageing management identified through the activity of the
SCAP Cable Working Group are presented in following sub-sections. In addition, the items to be
considered especially for new plants are described in Section 4.3.8, entitled “New plants”. It is
desirable that all the items of the commendable practices in this section be applied to EQ cables. For
non-EQ cables, the items related to environmental qualification are excluded; however certain
elements of the programme may be adopted based on specific needs.
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
4.3.2 Specification
Power cables with shield
The United States experience indicates that the condition monitoring of power cables has become a
necessity in order to ensure the operational readiness of the cable. The medium-voltage cables that
power most of the emergency core cooling pumps and feeds to 1E power supplies serve a significant
function for nuclear safety. Some of these cables are normally energised and some are in standby
conditions during the power operation of the plant. As the plants continue to age, several factors
could contribute to insulation degradation.
Such degradation has to be monitored and corrective actions have to be implemented to prevent
operational failures that could trip the plant or limit core cooling capability. The cables that have a
continuous shield as part of the cable jacket provide much wider and better options in condition
monitoring. Therefore, power cables for new plants or replacement cables for the operating plants
should consider using only cables with a metallic shield.
4.3.3 Inspection
Condition monitoring inspections and tests can provide the means for evaluating the level of ageing
degradation of electric cables. The cables are exposed to a variety of environmental and operational
stressors throughout their service life. Environmental stressors can include elevated temperatures,
high radiation, high humidity, moisture intrusion, accumulation of dirt and dust and exposure to
chemicals or other reactive contaminants. Operational stressors can include external interference,
installation and maintenance damage, high voltage stress, materials defects, water treeing and electrical
transients. Over time, the ageing and degradation mechanisms caused by these stressors can eventually
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
lead to early failure of the cable. It is therefore important to have periodic condition-monitoring
inspection and testing of electric cables in the assessment of cable ageing and degradation. Severely
damaged or degraded cable insulation can then be identified and repaired or replaced to prevent
unexpected early failures while in service.
In addition, the benefits of periodic cable condition-monitoring inspections and testing can be
further complemented by monitoring cable operating environments. Environmental stressors, especially
temperature, moisture/flooding and radiation, can contribute to significant ageing and degradation of
electric cable insulation and jacket materials. Monitoring and management of the environmental
conditions in which cables are operated can help operators to identify adverse stressors so that
measures can be taken to control or reduce ageing and degradation.
4.3.4 Maintenance
Maintenance activities interact in various ways with the specified function of components and
environmental conditions within the area where the activities are performed. Procedures are
established to assure that conditions at the end of maintenance activities are within specified limits.
Regarding cable ageing, past experience has demonstrated the importance of the following areas.
Applicability of indenter
For maintenance, the level of degradation of cable insulation needs to be measured appropriately.
Elongation at break (EAB) is considered to be a good condition indicator for degradation of polymer
and a lot of EAB data have been accumulated.
In the ACA project, the applicability of the indenter modulus method for cables was tested by
checking its correlation with EAB. In the test, reliability of the diagnostic was confirmed by round
robin test with an improved type of indenter modulus device with bearing of the probe actuator made
in Japan and higher supply voltage, developed by Institute of Nuclear Safety System, Inc. (INSS, Japan)
and AEA Technology Inc. (UK). As a result, it was found that there is a good correlation between
indenter modulus and EAB (shown in Figure 4.3.4-1) and therefore the method is proven to be
applicable to the condition-based EQ.
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
40 30
black core
30 white core 25 white core
red core red core
20 20
10 15
0 10
600 500 400 300 200 100 0 500 400 300 200 100 0
Elongation at break (%) Elongation at break (%)
(3) The SIR #1 insulator (R2 = 0.99) (4) The SHPVC #2 insulator (R2 = 0.91)
35 250
30
Indenter modulus (N/mm)
black core
black core 200 white core
25 white core red core
red core
20 150
15
100
10
5 50
400 300 200 100 0 300 200 100 0
Elongation at break (%) Elongation at break (%)
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
Dark trace
Red trace
and no action would be taken by the analysis of only the current, most recent measurement. However,
a comparative analysis of the two signatures would discover a developing change that should be
addressed, see the lower graph on Figure 4.3.4-2.
This approach is called Baseline Analysis of Installed Cables and is particularly suited for new or
good cables, when a reference signature can be taken before any damage or degradation has occurred.
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
Figure 4.3.5-1: Comparison of the methods for Cable Environmental Qualification Test
Present evaluation method The Guide for Cable Environmental Qualification Test
(IEEE Std. 323-2003 and 383-2003) for Nuclear Power Plants
Establishment of
thermal ageing Based on operating conditions of
1. Equivalent thermal ageing conditions by the actual operating plant,
during normal operation Arrhenius low. simultaneous ageing conditions
Example: are established by the
superposition of time dependent
66°C - 60 years to
1. Equivalent simultaneous data and superposition of dose to
121°C - 24 days*1 equivalent damage data etc.*2
ageing during normal
operation Activation energy is determined by
taking into account the
temperature values in the actual
operating plant temperature
2. Equivalent radiation Example: region*3.
exposure during normal 40 years: 500 kGy Temperature and a dose rate
operation (10 kGy/h or less) should be the values with which
progress of degradation was
checked to an inner part of an
insulator. (Example:
66°C – 60 years to
Example: 100°C – 100 Gy/h – 480 days) *4
3. Equivalent radiation BWR: 260 kGy 2. Equivalent radiation
exposure during accident PWR: 1 500 kGy exposure during accident Integrating dose is set based on the
(10 kGy/h or less) analysis result of the actual operating
plant. The dose rate is 10 kGy/h or
less.
4. Equivalent steam 3. Equivalent steam
Number of transient cycle is 1.
exposure during accident exposure during accident
*1: Extrapolation of activation energy evaluated from degradation characteristics in a high temperature region up to the actual
operating plant temperature is permitted.
In the above example, 33 kcal/mol is used for activation energy.
*2: There is the technique of same acceleration factor, such as making equal the accelerating factor of temperature and
radiation other than such technique.
*3: When the activation energy in the actual operating plant temperature region cannot be estimated, 41.8 kJ/mol (10 kcal/mol)
for silicon rubber and 62.8 kJ/mol (15 kcal/mol) for materials other than silicone rubber may be used.
*4: It set up with the superposition of time dependent data by making activation energy into 62.8 kJ/mol (15 kcal/mol).
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
* Determined by adding safety margin of small per cent because the value of EAB with 10% margin is nearly
equal to the initial value of EAB.
Table 4.3.6-2: The pre-ageing conditions and the results of the LOCA tests
COMMENDABLE PRACTICE
The acceptance criteria can be used for condition-based EQ, in which cables are periodically tested
after they are installed by comparing the EAB value with the management values. For condition-based
EQ, management values should be determined based on the result of the LOCA test of cable samples
that are pre-aged by low accelerated simultaneous thermal and radiation ageing test. If management
values are set using high accelerated pre-ageing test, it will be non-conservative value.
However, the condition indicator of EAB is obtained using a destructive test. Condition indicators
that can be obtained non-destructively are desirable for condition-based EQ. Other non-destructive
condition indicators such as indenter modulus can be used as an alternative condition indicator if
their correlation with the condition indicator of EAB is confirmed. The correlation between the indenter
modulus of improved type and indicator of EAB has already been confirmed in the ACA project and its
outline is described in Section 4.3.4.
5.1 Lessons learned from the SCAP process and potential follow-up activities
The working groups have brought together representatives of regulators, operators, vendors and
academics working in the field, and this combination has been found to be invaluable for the
successful execution of the project.
The products of each working group are a database, a knowledge base and commendable practices
which will support both regulators and operators. The use of the products will strengthen technical
approaches to optimise ageing management in the areas of SCC and cable ageing. The products are
useful tools and documents for technical experts including the younger generations of engineers, and
they are of even greater use when they are continuously enhanced and updated.
The working process of SCAP has also provided an important example to demonstrate how such
a challenging task can be effectively addressed and therefore could be used as a basis for other topics
in ageing management. Vital elements of the working process have been the identification of priority
items of common interest, the assignment of a dedicated project co-ordinator, chairperson and
clearing house with expert knowledge and lead organisations providing input to start the discussion
and giving orientation.
The international knowledge that was collected in this project should help industry organisations
to revise existing standards or develop new standards. IEEE and IEC have just started such activities
and this foundation should help the regulators to implement requirements and programmes to
support safe long-term operation of nuclear power plants.
The US is launching new research in light of the lessons learned from this project. The impact of
concurrent ageing, dose rate effects, manufacturing tolerance and oxygen-starved chambers for LOCA
tests became areas of interest that require further research.
Research efforts are also ongoing in other countries. An important aspect of the research will be
international co-operation such as has been developed within this project, during which regulators,
operators, vendors and academics have collaborated in an open and productive manner.
mechanisms are the subject of ongoing research, as are the inspection and mitigation techniques.
This ongoing work should be added to the knowledge base as it becomes available.
The SCAP SCC event database is a development of the OPDE database. It covers more types of
components and the information about stress corrosion cracking is much more extensive and detailed.
The database is not complete and new events will occur and need to be added. The approach taken by
which the working group concentrated upon ensuring that the representative events were as complete
as possible means that for many purposes it is necessary to expand the information for many of the
other events, including those transferred from OPDE. It is important that this collection of operational
experience continue.
After an investigative meeting together with the OPDE Programme Review Group it was agreed
that the two groups should work together to establish a new project under the CSNI. This new project
should combine the best of the two projects with respect to content, scope and working methods.
Since OPDE has an agreement which expires at the end of May 2011, the interim period after the
completion of the SCAP project will be used to define the new project in more detail whilst
maintaining the important network of contacts established within the SCAP SCC Working Group.
REFERENCES
References
[1] Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), “Regulatory Aspects of Ageing Reactors”, 1998 Committee on Nuclear
Regulatory Activities (CNRA) Special Issue Meeting, OECD/NEA, Paris, NEA/CNRA/R(99)1, March 1999.
[2] NEA, Technical Aspects of Ageing for Long-term Operation, OECD/NEA, Paris, NEA/CSNI/R(2002)26.
[3] NEA, Research Efforts Related to Wire System Ageing in NEA Member Countries, OECD/NEA, Paris,
NEA/CSNI/R(2004)12.
[4] NEA, Status Report on Developments and Co-operation on RI-ISI and NDT Qualification in OECD/NEA
Member Countries, OECD/NEA, Paris, NEA/CSNI/R(2005)9.
[5] NEA, “Better Nuclear Plant Maintenance: Improving Human and Organisational Performance”,
CSNI Technical Opinion Papers, No. 11, OECD/NEA, Paris, NEA/CSNI/R(2006)8.
[6] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Safety Aspects of Nuclear Power Plant Ageing, IAEA-
TECDOC-540, IAEA, Vienna (1990).
[7] IAEA, “Data Collection and Record Keeping for the Management of Nuclear Power Plant Ageing”,
IAEA Safety Series, No. 50-P-3, IAEA, Vienna (1991).
[8] IAEA, “Methodology for Ageing Management of Nuclear Power Plant Components Important to
Safety”, IAEA Technical Report Series, No. 338, IAEA, Vienna (1992).
[9] IAEA, “Implementation and Review of Nuclear Power Plant Ageing Management Programme”,
IAEA Safety Report Series, No. 15, IAEA, Vienna (1999).
[10] IAEA, Assessment and Management of Ageing of Major Nuclear Power Plant Components Important to
Safety: Steam Generators, IAEA-TECDOC-981, IAEA, Vienna (1997).
[11] IAEA, Assessment and Management of Ageing of Major Nuclear Power Plant Components Important to
Safety: PWR Vessel Internals, IAEA-TECDOC-1119, IAEA, Vienna (1999).
[12] IAEA, “Ageing Management for Nuclear Power Plants”, IAEA Safety Guide, NS-G-2.12 (2009).
[13] IAEA, “Proactive Management of Ageing Management of Ageing for Nuclear Power Plants”, IAEA
Safety Report Series, No. 62, IAEA, Vienna (2009).
[14] IAEA, “Safe Long-term Operation of Nuclear Power Plants”, IAEA Safety Report Series, No. 57,
IAEA, Vienna (2008).
[15] IAEA, IAEA Safety Glossary Terminology Used in Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection, 2007 ed.,
IAEA, Vienna (2007).
[16] Taylor, James M., Completion of the Fatigue Action Plan, SECY-95-245, United States Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (US NRC), Washington, DC, 25 September 1995.
[17] United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC), Fatigue Analysis of Components for
60-year Plant Life, NUREG/CR-6674 (PNNL-13227), June 2000.
[18] Thadani, Ashok C., “Fatigue Evaluation of Metal Components for 60 Year Plant Life”,
Memorandum from Ashok C. Thadani, Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, to
William D. Travers, Executive Director for Operations, Closeout of Generic Safety Issue 190,
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 26 December 1999.
[19] National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology, Review of Federal Program
for Wire System Safety, United States White House, November 2000.
REFERENCES
[20] IAEA, Assessment and Management of Ageing of Major NPP Components Important to Safety, IAEA-
TECDOC-1188, IAEA, Vienna (2000).
[21] NEA, Research Efforts Related to Wire System Ageing in Member States, OECD/NEA, Paris (2002).
[22] US NRC, Environmental Qualification of Low-voltage Instrumentation and Control Cables, RIS 2003-09
(2003).
[23] Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers (IEEE), Qualifying Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power
Generating Stations, IEEE-323, IEEE, New York (1974, 1983).
[24] IEEE, “Type Test of Class 1E Electric Cables, Filed Splices and Connections for Nuclear Power
Generating Stations”, IEEE-383, IEEE, New York (1974).
[25] US NRC, “Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear
Power Plants”, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 10, Part 50.49.
[26] International Electrothecnical Commission (IEC), Qualification of Electrical Equipment of the Safety
System for Nuclear Power Plants, IEC 780, IEC, Geneva (1984).
[27] IEC, “Qualification of Electrical Equipment of the Safety System for Nuclear Power Plants”,
IEC 60780, IEC, Geneva (1997).
[28] IEC, Guide for Determining the Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Insulation Materials, IEC 544, IEC,
Geneva (1977, 1985, 1991).
[29] Kerntechnischer Ausschuss (KTA, German Nuclear Safety Standards Commission), Ensuring the
Loss-of-coolant-accident Resistance of Electrotechnical Components and of Components in the
Instrumentation and Controls of Operating Nuclear Power Plants, KTA 3706, KTA, Germany (2000)
(in German).
[30] Svenska karnkraftverken, Environmental Qualification for Accident Conditions, KBE EP-154, Sweden
(1996).
[31] US NRC, Assessment of Environment Qualification Practices and Condition Monitoring Techniques for
Low Voltage Electric Cables, NUREG/CR-6704 (2001).
[32] SCK•CEN (Belgian Nuclear Research Centre), Topical Day on Cable Ageing in Nuclear Environments,
SCK/CEN-BLG-969, Mol, Belgium (2003).
[33] Yamamoto, T., T. Minakawa, The Final Report of the Project of Assessment of Cable Ageing for Nuclear
Power Plants, JNES-SS-0903, Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (JNES), Tokyo, Japan (2009).
[34] Sindelar, Robert L., “Nuclear Radiation”, presentation paper of short course of Introduction to
Nuclear Fuel Cycle Chemistry of Vanderbilt University School of Engineering, Nashville, TN,
USA, 4-6 August 2009.
www.cresp.org/NuclearFuelCycleCourseII/Presentations/05_SINDELAR_CRESP_%20Sindelar_Bob_August_
2009.pdf
[35] European Utility Requirements (EUR), European Utility Requirements for LWR Nuclear Power
Plants (website), Revision C, Vol. 2, Chapter 2.6: Material-related Requirements,
www.europeanutilityrequirements.org.
This appendix describes the Japanese approach to the ageing management of stress corrosion
cracking. The tables describe, for each stress corrosion cracking mode, appropriate methods for
preventative maintenance, the inspection, mitigation, repair and replacement, safety assessment and
research based on the information in the knowledge base.
Introduction
Many stress corrosion cracking (SCC) events occurred in different structures, systems and components
(SSC) of nuclear power plant as early as the 1970s and have continued to the present time. The causes
of these events were sensitisation of material to high heat input, local high residual stress, surface
finishing and hardness, associated with certain environments (such as high-temperature water). For
these reasons, it is necessary to carry out maintenance activities, inspections with the appropriate
intervals, monitoring and collection of relevant data, preventive maintenance/mitigation, repair/
replacement and safety assessment to minimise the occurrence of future events.
Therefore, knowledge should be extracted from the database (operational experience and recent
findings) by analysing and evaluating the data from the viewpoint of the implementation of
appropriate ageing management and maintenance activities beneficial to both regulatory authorities
and operators.
To achieve the goal for both operator and regulators, a well-grounded technical information basis
(TIB) is needed. The ageing management and maintenance activities for SCC are to be performed
under the following three stage considerations:
1) Ageing management from the early stage of nuclear power plant operation. Effective ageing
management can be achieved if performed regularly from the early stage of operation.
2) Ageing management every 10 years within the framework of PSR. The subject of investigation
should include those ageing mechanisms for which mid-term trend monitoring is effective.
3) Ageing management before the operation for 30 years and following every 10 years. The ageing
mechanisms which require the ageing management technical assessment (AMTA) shall be
identified and specified. SCC should be managed in accordance with trend monitoring which
can be performed through inspections, and thus the ageing management programme (AMP)
should be established based on such results.
As shown in Figure 2.1-1 it is first necessary to define an ageing management programme (AMP)
for the countermeasure of SCC by selecting the structures, systems and components (SSC), determining
the safety-important specific SCC mechanisms, and determining the criteria for evaluating if the
intended safety function of SSC are maintained. It is necessary to perform evaluations consistent with
long-term operation (e.g. 40 or 60 years), and to include the evaluation results in a preventive
maintenance plan (or AMP contained inspection, repair/replacement, monitoring/surveillance).
In order to perform optimal preventive maintenance for SCC, utilities should establish a long-term
maintenance management plan (LMP). For safe long-term operation a well-grounded TIB is needed for
each of the SCC mechanisms. To construct it, comprehensive activities, including the results of
research and development, establishment of codes and standards, and consolidation of maintenance
activities (PDCA), need to be continuously reviewed.
There are several factors which may hinder effective ageing management and may lead to either
unexpected or premature ageing (i.e. IGSCC, PWSCC). These factors or weaknesses need to be
identified and addressed in a proactive approach by experts.
As shown in Figure 1.5-1 and Table 2.1-1, effective ageing management for SCC throughout the
service life requires the use of a systematic approach to manage ageing. It is helpful to use the basic
idea of a framework for co-ordinating all ageing management programmes and activities based on the
understanding of preventive maintenance, mitigation, repair and replacement, inspection/monitoring/
qualification, safety assessment, and research and development on the ageing mechanism and/or
ageing effects of the SSC.
As described in Section 1.5, the IAEA Safety Standard Series No. NS-G-2.12 “Ageing Management
for Nuclear Power Plants” explains how to extract and make commendable practices equal to
appropriate ageing management programmes (AMP) for SCC.
The guide outlines nine generic attributes of an effective ageing management programme: scope of
the ageing management programme, preventative actions to minimise control and ageing mechanism,
detection of ageing effects, monitoring and trending of ageing effects, mitigation of ageing effects,
acceptance criteria, corrective actions, operating experience feedback and feedback of research and
development, and quality management.
It is also important to establish the TIB to establish commendable practices from knowledge base
data which should include at least the following five items, excluding the international harmonisation
of quality management not within the scope of SCAP.
• inspection/monitoring/qualification;
• preventive maintenance/mitigation;
• repair/replacement;
• safety assessment (flaw evaluation/fracture);
• R&D (initiation/crack growth/fracture).
Table A-1: Commendable practices for IGSCC of stainless steel in Japan (cont.)
Table A-2: Commendable practices for IGSCC of Ni-based alloy including PWSCC (PWR) in Japan
Items Commendable practices
IGSCC is a degradation mechanism that a number of events tackled tens of years in the past.
Also, the IGSCC mechanism is insufficiently clear. Therefore, systematic ageing management
combined with inspection and preventive maintenance are required to be performed from the early
stage of nuclear power plant operation.
Ageing
management The ageing management programmes (AMP) should be developed based on the update and
evaluated previous inspection data and research results. It is recommended to select the
appropriate preventive activities from the following items in this table based on the applicable
regulation, the structural integrity evaluation on the maintenance of SSC functions, and assumption
of the safe long-term operation.
It is recommended to improve more than two factors among three factors as shown in material,
stress and the environment to do repair weld, mitigation, and replacement, as the IGSCC
mechanism of Ni-based alloy including PWSCC is not sufficiently clear.
Material:
• Alloy 690 base metal and Alloy 52 and 152 weld metal are resistant for PWSCC. These materials
should be employed for replacing materials or repair weld or cladding materials to isolate the
existing Alloy 600.
Preventive Residual stress:
maintenance/ • Peening (shot peening, US Peening, water jet peening, laser peening).
mitigation • Outer surface irradiated laser stress improvement process (L-SIP).
• Polishing.
Water chemistry:
• Optimisation of dissolved hydrogen concentration.
Peening, outer surface irradiated laser stress improvement process (L-SIP), surface residual stress
improvement by polishing are recommended to reduce residual stress caused by welding or to
improve tensile stress on material surface caused by severe plastic deformation during fabrication
into compressive stress.
It is recommended to select appropriate inspection to maintain the safety function of the SSC:
• To identify the cause of cracking, it is desired to observe crack morphologies by visual inspection,
ECT, printed replicas and SUMP observation and to compare them with those observed in past
events.
Inspection, • To detect cracking, bare metal inspection within a required period is recommended in addition to a
monitoring, leak test conducted during every refuelling outage. The methods to detect the SCC include visual
qualification inspection capable of discriminate 0.0254 mm wires, liquid penetrant inspection, phased array
ultrasonic inspection (detection and sizing).
Because PWSCC propagates along columnar (dendrite) microstructure in the weld metal, when the
sizing of the cracks by UT inspection, the attenuation and scattering of UT signal due to grain of
weld metal need to be considered.
When PWSCC is detected, flaw evaluation (crack growth evaluation and fracture evaluation) should
be conducted in accordance with the applicable regulatory guidelines and to confirm that the
Safety components satisfy the required safety functions throughout the pre-determined evaluation period.
assessment • Crack growth evaluation. Based on the crack growth rate of the relevant material/environment
(flaw evaluation/ combination, the crack size at the end of the pre-determined evaluation period should be
fracture) estimated.
• Fracture evaluation. Determine whether or not the estimated cracking size at the end of the
evaluation period could reach the allowable limit which might cause fracture of the component.
Same as preventive maintenance/mitigation.
Many of the considerations for preventative maintenance and mitigation are applicable for repair
and replacement. The difference between these two concepts is that the latter is carried out after a
crack has been detected and the former, as the name implies, is carried out before a crack is found
Repair and in order to try to prevent stress corrosion cracking.
replacement It is recommended that the validity and reliability of the methods in terms of the long-term operation
are verified by a third-party organisation.
Especially, if applying Alloy 690 and its weld metals, Alloys 152/52 as a countermeasure, special
consideration should be paid to the susceptibility to micro-cracking due to local residual stresses
along the grain boundaries in the repair weld.
Table A-3: Commendable practices for IGSCC of Ni-based alloy including NiSCC (BWR) in Japan
Items Commendable practices
IGSCC is a degradation mechanism that a number of events tackled tens of years in the past. The
IGSCC mechanism is insufficiently clear. Therefore, systematically ageing management combined
inspection and preventive maintenance are required to be performed from the early stage of nuclear
power plant operation.
Ageing
management The ageing management programmes (AMP) should be developed based on the updated and
evaluated previous inspection database and research results. It is recommended to select the
appropriate preventive activities from the following items in this table based on the applicable
regulation, the structural integrity evaluation on the maintenance of SSC functions, and assumption
of the safe long-term operation.
It is commendable practice to eliminate more than two factors among three factors as shown in
material, stress and the environment to do repair weld, mitigation and replacement, as the IGSCC
mechanism of Ni-based alloy including NiSCC is not sufficiently made clear.
Material
• To use SCC resistant Ni-based alloys, such as Alloy 82, modified Alloy 600 and modified Alloy 182.
Preventive Alloy 82 contains higher Cr than conventional Alloy 182 and has shown excellent field performance.
maintenance/ Modified Alloy 600 and 182 contain niobium (Nb) to stabilise carbon by suppressing chromium
mitigation carbide precipitation especially.
Stress/environment
• Same as the IGSCC of stainless steels.
• The recommended methods to reduce residual stress caused by welding or to improve tensile
stress on material surface caused by severe plastic deformation during fabrication into
compressive stress are peening, surface residual stress improvement by polishing.
It is recommended to select appropriate inspection to maintain the safety function of the SSC:
• To identify the cause of cracking, it is desired to observe crack morphologies by visual inspection,
ECT, printed replicas and SUMP observation and to compare them with those observed for past
Inspection, events.
monitoring,
qualification • To detect cracking, visual inspection in addition to leak test conducted during every refuelling
outage.
Because NiSCC propagates along columnar (dendrite) microstructure in the weld metal, when the
sizing of the cracks by UT inspection, the attenuation of UT signal should be considered.
It should conduct flaw evaluation (crack growth evaluation and fracture evaluation) in accordance
with the applicable regulatory guidelines and confirm that the components satisfy the required
Safety safety functions during the pre-determined evaluation period.
assessment • Crack growth evaluation. Based on the crack growth rate of the relevant material/environment
(flaw evaluation/ combination, the crack size at the end of the pre-determined evaluation period should be
fracture) estimated.
• Fracture evaluation. Determine whether or not the estimated cracking size at the end of the
evaluation period could reach the allowable limit which might cause fracture of the component.
Same as preventive maintenance/mitigation.
Many of the considerations for preventative maintenance and mitigation are applicable for repair
and replacement. The difference between these two concepts is that the latter is carried out after a
Repair and crack has been detected and the former, as the name implies, is carried out before a crack is found
replacement in order to try to prevent stress corrosion cracking.
• It is recommended that the validity and reliability of the methods in terms of the long-term
operation be verified by a third-party organisation.
• To select proper methods upon investigating the structures, workability, etc.
• It is necessary to promote further development of reliable methods on SCC initiation, growth
evaluation and integrity evaluation. It is necessary to understand and manage the SCC
phenomena in operating plants in a precise manner and to prepare and study rationalised
R&D inspection frequency. The following themes are desirable:
• To develop modelling and UT simulation technology on SCC initiation and its propagation.
• To study an evaluation of SCC propagation behaviour of weld fusion line of dissimilar weld joint
between ferrite steel and Ni-based alloys.
Table A-4: Commendable practices for irradiation-assisted corrosion cracking (IASCC) in Japan
Table A-5: Commendable practices for external chloride corrosion cracking (ECSCC) in Japan
SCAP MANAGEMENT BOARD, SCC WORKING GROUP AND CABLE WORKING GROUP
Member
Organisation Experts
states
Belgium SCK•CEN (Belgian Nuclear Research Centre) Andrei Goussarov
Canada CNSC (Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission) Robert Lojk
Czech
NRI (Nuclear Research Institute) Jiri Zdarek
Republic
Finland STUK (Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority) Martti Vilpas
EDF-SEPTEN Claude Faidy
France IRSN/DSR/SAMS/BAMM
Marc Le Calvar
(Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire)
ASN (Nuclear Safety Authority) Rachel Vaucher
Germany GRS mbH Frank Michel
Korea KINS, Materials Engineering Department Koo-Kab Chung
Naoto Sekimura
University of Tokyo
(Chair)
Japan METI/NISA Hiroki Ishigaki
(Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry,
Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency) Kentaro Morita
National Commission on Nuclear Safety and Safeguards
Mexico Pablo Ruiz Lopez
(Mexican Nuclear Regulatory Body)
OECD Halden Reactor Project,
Norway Paolo Fantoni
Computerised Operation Support Systems Division
Slovak
VUJE Inc. Martin Brezina
Republic
Figueras Clavijo, Jose Maria
Spain CSN (Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear)
Jose M. Fernandez Cernuda
Sweden Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) Karen Gott
Aladar Csontos
United States US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Thomas Koshy
EC
Joint Research Centre – IE (Institute for Energy) Luigi Debarberis
(Observer)
IAEA Engineering Safety Section,
Ervin Liszka
(Observer) Division of Nuclear Installation Safety
SCAP MANAGEMENT BOARD, SCC WORKING GROUP AND CABLE WORKING GROUP
Member
Organisation Experts
states
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission,
Canada Jovica Riznic
Operational Engineering Assessment Division
Czech NRI Rez plc (Nuclear Research Institute),
Marek Postler
Republic Structural Properties and Corrosion Department
Finland VTT (Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus) Pertti Aaltonen
IRSN/DSR/SAMS/BAMM
Marc Le Calvar
France (Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire)
ASN Directorate for Nuclear Pressure Vessels (DEP) Liliane Gogoluszko
AREVA, NTM-G Renate Kilian
Germany AREVA, NTM-G Armin Roth
GRS mbH Frank Michel
Sung-Sik Kang
KINS, Regulatory Research Division
Korea Koo-Kab Chung
Seoul National University, Nuclear Engineering Department Il Soon Hwang
Tohoku University Tetsuo Shoji
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI),
Yutaka Sosa
Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA)
Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) Kunio Onizawa
Japan
Masaaki Kikuchi
Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (JNES)
Masakuni Koyama
Nuclear Engineering, Ltd. (NEL) Takeshi Sakai
Toshiba Corporation Ryoichi Saeki
Mexican Nuclear Regulatory Body,
Mexico Pablo Ruiz Lopez
National Commission on Nuclear Safety and Safeguards
Slovak
VUJE Inc. Martin Brezina
Republic
CSN (Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear) Jose Maria Figueras Clavijo
Spain
TECNATOM S.A. Xavier Jardí Cuerda
Karen Gott
Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM)
Sweden (Chair)
Vattenfall Pål Efsing
Switzerland ENSI (Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate) Klaus Germerdonk
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
United
Component Integrity Branch Office of Aladar Csontos
States
Nuclear Regulatory Research
EC
Joint Research Centre – IE (Institute for Energy) Ralf Ahlstrand
(Observer)
IAEA Engineering Safety Section,
Ervin Liszka
(Observer) Division of Nuclear Installation Safety
(Clearing
SIGMA, USA Bengt Lydell
House)
Peter Ford
SCAP SCC Consultant
Peter Scott
SCAP MANAGEMENT BOARD, SCC WORKING GROUP AND CABLE WORKING GROUP
Member
Organisation Experts
states
Argentine
National Atomic Energy Commission Jorge Zorrilla
Republic
SCK•CEN (Belgian Nuclear Research Centre) Andrei Goussarov
Belgium
LABORELEC Jean Tusset
CNSC (Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission),
Canada Desire Ndomba
Systems Engineering Division
NRI Rez plc (Nuclear Research Institute)
Czech
Radiation Chemistry and Vit Placek
Republic
Environmental Qualification Department
Finland STUK (Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority) Kim Wahlström
France IRSN (Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire) Juliette Colombani
AREVA, NTR-G Peter Waber
Germany Volker Wild
GRS mbH
André Lochthofen
KINS (Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety),
Korea Cheol-Soo, Goo
Nuclear Regulation Division
Waseda University Yoshimichi Ohki
Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) Tadao Seguchi
Toshio Yamamoto
Japan Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (JNES)
Takefumi Minakawa
Kazunari Bunno
Nuclear Engineering, Ltd. (NEL)
Hideo Hirao
OECD Halden Reactor Project,
Norway Paolo Fantoni
Computerised Operation Support Systems Division
Slovak
VUJE Inc. Miroslav Lukac
Republic
Jose M. Fernandez-Cernuda
CSN (Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear)
Spain Migoya
Tecnatom Jorge Gonzalez Nieto
Swedish Radiation Safety Authority Tage Eriksson
Sweden
Ringhals AB Anders Nygårds
Thomas Koshy
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Chair)
United States
Nitin Patel
Wyle Labs Tom Brewington
Certification Centre of I&C systems Raisa Naryzhna
Ukraine
of State Centre of Supplies and Cervices Quality of Ukraine Tetyana Chetverikova