Feasibility 5
Feasibility 5
1. General Description
“Open, Green spaces when optimized, can promote development, economic growth, and
climate change resiliency.”
Davao is growing at an unprecedented pace. However,
development comes at a price. Because of cultural and socio-
political limitations, we are faced with the burdens of a growing
metropolis - uncontrolled sprawl, settlements within hazardous
areas, frail planning enforcement, little climate change awareness,
and pollution, just to name a few.
Within several years, the Davao River will be devoid of its
natural processes due to the measures we are implementing such
as concreting the river banks. This not only aggravates our capacity
to adapt to climate change but does not mitigate pollution in our Figure 1 - Mangrove strip provide
river. These adverse effects reduce land values, impair tourism, and added protection
endangers life and health to the city. It won’t be long until our river becomes the next Pasig River.
Clean-up drives can only do so much as pollution will return if the river is not maintained. We have
to solve the problem from the roots to keep a sustainable, balanced ecosystem.
Rehabilitating waterways and natural features are the enduring goal of all major cities (i.e.,
Tokyo, Seoul, Brisbane, etc.) Our group sees Davao City taking the conscious step to follow suit
with these global cities into the future. Our group also hopes to promote urban tourism and be
able to provide this alternative to achieve our city’s vision to become a Premiere city of the EAGA
and Asia-Pacific Region.
We therefore propose a river easement that can accommodate a public park and a 4-lane road.
Our design aims to cut travel time between the north and south. In addition to this, the
development aims to rehabilitate the river’s ecosystem to reintroduce natural flora endemic in
Davao River.
Secondly, to construct a series of flood reservoirs and dikes as disaster mitigation by
strategically placing these reservoirs along populated areas beside the river to divert flood waters
from said areas, as well as retention ponds to minimize surface runoff from nearby impermeable
surfaces such as pavements and streets.
1.1. Implementation Period
Feasibility studies will begin as soon as this plan is deemed amenable, after which the planning
stage can begin. Implementation will start within 2020-2022, preferably within the span of the
present administration to ensure funding from the National Government.
2. Business Case
2.1. Project Title
“Design for the Davao River Riparian Parks System”
2.2. Executive Summary
Davao River is one of the city’s most noticeable natural
features but it is often overlooked. It is often treated as a
backwater with establishments facing away from the river.
In developed countries, the riverfront is one of the most
valuable properties in the city such as the river Seine in Paris
or the Huangpu River in Shanghai.
proposer found this troublesome as it not only affects land value but also the quality of the
city’s water ways.
2.3.2. Scope
For clarification purpose, this proposal is intended for the design and plan only of the
proposed Davao River Riparian Parks System. The scope involves:
1. Master development plan
2. Architectural, Civil, Electrical, Mechanical and Sanitary Plans
3. Bill of Quantities and Estimates
The scope of the project itself spans multiple barangays and begins at the mouth of the
river in the Bucana Districts and ends in the CP Garcia Bridge in Maa. The objective is to build
a continuous park and a 4-lane road that begins at the mouth of the river at the coastal road
to the CP Garcia Bridge in diversion road. In areas where it has a narrow corridor, an absolute
width of 21 meters should be maintained from the established water line. (15 meter-ROW and
6 meters easement.)
The project itself involves:
1. Clearing/relocation of informal settlers or the purchase of affected private
properties thereof.
2. Earthworks for the finished level of the park and road network.
3. Construction of revetment to the furthest distance from the bank as practicable to
accommodate mangrove patches.
4. Construction of Flood Reservoirs, and waste water treatment facilities
5. Construction of roads and pavements.
6. Landscaping, community planting drives.
2.3.3. Benefits and Strategic Alignment
Project Benefits:
By building a Riparian Park and bypass road, the city will have gained in:
Strategic Alignment:
In line with the city’s vision of being the tourism center of Mindanao as well as a Premier
city of the Asia-Pacific Region, this project aims to take a step further and make Davao City an
Asian Tourism hub as well as a globally competitive city in terms of sustainability as a model of
ecological balance.
At the national level, this project is guided and mandated by two landmark national
laws, the Climate Change Act of 2009 (RA 9729) and the Disaster Risk Reduction and
Management Act of 2010 (RA 10121), which aims to mainstream climate change adaptation
and disaster risk reduction. It is therefore imperative that these projects be integrated into the
urban master plan.
Development ought to act as a buffer zone between the Davao River and the urban
areas to “allow controlled development while retaining desirable environmental site features”.
It is also worth noting that trees and green parks ought to be considered as public health
infrastructure.
Annex 8-7. Of the Green Urban Development Performance Guidelines by the HLURB
encompasses several of this project’s benefits and strategic alignment to the LGU of Davao
namely;
1. Water and Wastewater 7. Detention and Infiltration
Infrastructure Structures
2. Floodplain Avoidance 8. Pedestrianization
3. Protection [restoration] of 9. Enhance and Maintain
Ecological Features Streetscape
4. Protection of Wetlands and 10. Street Trees
Water Bodies 11. Increase and Improve Public
5. Protection of Imperiled Space and Green Areas
Species and Ecological 12. Heat Island Reduction
Communities 13. Solid Waste Management
6. Storm water Management 14. Water Efficient Landscaping
General
Public & Financial
Interested Benefits
Groups Davao
River
Constitution Esplanade Risk
& R.A. 7160
Assessment
“Local Govt
Code”
Alignment to
R.A. 9729, Local and Absorptive Environmental
R.A. 10121 National Impact
Capacity
Policies
2.6. Financial
2.6.1. Summary of Capital Costs-Assumptions
1. Construction Cost (CC)
Description Unit Unit Cost (PhP) Unit Total Cost (PhP)
Quantity
1 4 lanes 1 km 80,000,000/km 4000m 480,000,000
2 Revetment 0.35 km 40,000,000/0.35km 9000m 1,040,000,000
3 Site 1 sq.m. 1500/sq.m 490,628 735,942,000
Development sq.m
4 Flood Reservoir 1 pc 10,000,000/pc 30 pcs 300,000,000
Total Estimated Construction Cost 2,555,942,000*
2. Land Acquisition Cost
Description Unit Unit Cost (PhP) Unit Total Cost (PhP)
Quantity
1 Relocation of 1 500,000/per 3,613 1,806,500,000
Settlers household household ** households
2 Purchase of 1 sq.m 5000/sq.m. 520,555m 2,602,775,000
Private
Property
Total Estimated Land Acquisition Cost 4,409,275,000*
3. Consultation Fees
Description Unit Unit Cost (PhP) Unit Total Cost (PhP)
Quantity
1 Detailed 1 0.3% of Const. Cost 1 7,667,826
Architectural
and Engineering
Design
* Average cost of real estate prices used at Bangkerohan and Magallanes ranging from PhP 1,500 – PhP 8,000 per
square meter.
*Cost derived from the annual average daily traffic (AADT) from DPWH of road sections in Davao connecting
Poblacion to Diversion Road of a total of 45,244 cars daily.
** Supposing the cost of a 30-minute travel is equivalent to P45 worth of fuel (Diesel).
Increased Tourism
Davao River, especially in Barangay Bucana, may well be patterned after the famous
“Gardens by the Bay”. With large areas of the Barangay largely under-developed, as well as in
large stretches of the Davao River. This is a potential goldmine in inviting tourism and
recognition for the city.
In Singapore, it is clear they capitalized on its esplanade for its tourism such as the
Marina Bay, the ‘merlion’ by the esplanade, and its gardens by the bay.
In Iloilo, The city’s beautification efforts thru its esplanade have made it a prime
destination for conventions and it has since become the most important landmark of the city
offering a peaceful respite and for leisurely stroll.
In Davao City, we are keen on investing on tourism at its fringes. But in essence, the city
has become a jump-off point to distant tourism spots such as in highlands or beaches. By
enticing tourists to the city with aesthetically pleasing infrastructure, the city itself may have
its share of urban tourism as well as a pleasant development for its citizens to enjoy.
2.8. Advantages/Disadvantages
2.8.1. Financial
1. Advantage
1. Increase in real estate values;
Potential to expose untapped property values worth billions.
Creation of new riverside commercial districts increasing commerce
and investments.
2. Drastically reduce traffic congestion costs due to link roads connecting
coastal road to diversion road.
3. Reduce damage costs from flooding and other related disasters due to
mitigation measures such as dikes, bio-retention ponds and flood
reservoirs.
4. Requires minimal maintenance cost. All landscape to be introduced, such
as palms and mangroves, are naturally occurring to the region.
5. Increase in tourism revenues due to unique esplanade design.
6. Rock revetment is cheaper than concrete embankment.
2. Disadvantage
1. Costs and logistics in relocating informal settlers.
2. Costs in land acquisition of private properties.
2.8.2. Non-Financial
1. Advantage
1. Significantly reduce travel time from north to south by road network
traversing the river from Coastal Road to Diversion Road.
2. Reduce damage to life and property by removing illegal settlements from
hazardous banks, slopes, and floodplains.
3. Reduce risk to urban flooding through bio-retention ponds and flood
reservoirs.
4. Sewage treatment plants to prevent further pollution of coastal areas.
5. Alleviate the pollution of Davao River and improve air and water quality
6. Reduce urban heat island effect, as well as provide green “lungs” for the
city.
7. Provide rational and environmental approach against uncontrolled urban
expansion
8. Improve the city’s natural environment, infrastructure, and visual quality.
9. Public Park for citizens to enjoy for leisure, and recreation.
10. Introduction of urban tourism
11. Rehabilitation, Protection, and conservation of the Davao River and
provide sanctuary for wildlife.
2. Disadvantage
1. Relocation of illegal settlements may prove troublesome, as it may impair
the local official’s standing among the displaced residents.
Sector Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Social Does this project improve the status of
Development well-being of the citizens in terms of
Gender Equity, Health, Education,
Culture, Recreation, and Welfare?
Economic Does this project invite investment,
Development Improve finances, real estate, and
tourism?
Infrastructure Can this project provide efficient
Development transportation and communication,
flood control and drainage?
Environment and Can this project mend pollution, and
Natural Resources improve the natural quality of the city?
Does this project provide sanctuary for
wildlife and improve air and water
quality, and efficient waste
management?
Institutional Can this project improve the delivery
Development capability of the LGU? Can this project
give positive public perception to the
quality of government plans and
programs?
Approving Body
Design and Planning Group, UAP,
DENR, etc.
Consultative Body
Project Coordinating
Board
Technical Working Group
1. Project Administrator (PA) – The mayor shall appoint one project administrator
to act on the mayor’s behalf. The PA, representing the Mayor, shall oversee the
project.
2. Project Coordinating Board – Establishment of project coordinating board
consisting of 1 representative from 5 groups. They shall act as the technical
working group that will monitor the project and provide valuable inputs that
will be translated into a working plan by the design group.
1. CPDO – act as Project Director (PD) and provide inputs on legal and
development matters.
2. CEO/JICA – Provide inputs on technical and engineering viability.
3. CENRO/DENR – Inputs on environmental and ecological concerns.
4. Brgy. Chairman (per site basis) – contextual and “on the ground” inputs.
5. Design Group – Translate board’s inputs into a working plan.
Report to the PA on
PA - Project Board Decisions,
Administrator progress, issues,
(Mayor's requests etc.
Representative)
Project
Coordinating
Board
Project
Management
Group