STRUCTURAL DESIGN BASIS REPORT

PROVISION OF OTM ACCOMMODATION FOR LLTR

UNIT AT 401 AF STATION,

SURYALANKA

STORAGE ACCN

Prepared by

DESIRE 2 DESIGN ENGINEERS

 Table of Content

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 Objective of the work

3.0 Geotechnical Data

4.0 General design criteria

4.1. Design Loads and combinations

4.2 Design Load Calculations

4.3 Wind Loads

4.4 Earthquake Forces

4.5 Environmental Conditions & Fire Protection

5.0 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

5.1 TYPICAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF FOOTING

5.2 TYPICAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF COLUMN

5.3 TYPICAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF BEAM

5.4 TYPICAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF SLAB

6.0 REFERENCES

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

 DESIGN BASIS REPORT AND TECHNICAL NOTE ON CONSTRUCTION
SYSTEM FOR STORAGE AT SURYALANKA

STAAD MODEL SHOWING 3-D VIEW OF

STORAGE ACCN

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

 STRUCTURAL DESIGN REPORT STORAGE ACCN

1.0INTRODUCTION

This report outlines the concept approach of the structural design carried out with the
basic parameters adopted and design assumptions considered towards the structural analysis catering
the functional and structural requirements compatible with the architectural requirements of the
building.
Scope of work:
The broad scope of works is as under:
 Design basis report
 Structural drawings
Site Location.
The proposed project site is located at Suryalanka

2.0Objective of the work:

(a) The design and engineering has been carried out with an uncompromised safety, stability,
strength, serviceability, and durability of the structures meet all Codal provisions,
economical, and supports easy / comfort living.
Consequently, the following activities have been completed in line with the above
 Structural analysis of Superstructure in STAAD and with detailed design
calculations in RCDC
 Reactions from the STAAD are taken and sub structure has been designed in excel
sheets.
 Detailed structural plans / drawings for the foundation and superstructures.

3.0 Geotechnical Data

Sub-structure:
IsolatedFoundation is proposed as per the feasibility study and geotechnical investigation
based on actual depth of founding strata, met at project site/pocket location. Construction of
substructure shall be in conventional cast-in-situ reinforced cement concrete since the depth would
vary as per actual site conditions. Reinforced cement concrete proposed for structural elements in sub
structure is of minimum M35 Grade.
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
Super-structure:
1. Very severe Exposure condition is considered for superstructure as per tender document.
2. Reinforced cement concrete used for RCC structural elements is of minimum M35 Grade as per
durability conditions stipulated in IS: 456-2000.

4.0 General design criteria

The superstructure is modeled using standard software “STAAD.Pro” as a space frame with a
grid of columns in the vertical direction, interconnected with beam members in the orthogonal
directions at each floor level. The nodes (the meeting points of beams with beams and beams with
columns) will be treated as rigid joints due to monolithic construction. The end nodes at the bottom
in the model will be fixed supports due to rigid connection of the columns with footings.
Design of Structural members
The member forces and support reactions as arrived through the analysis are utilized in the
design of structural members as per IS 456: 2000& IS 13920: 2016. All designs will be carried out
using the limit state method of design.
As per this method, the structure will be designed for all possible limit states of collapse and
serviceability.
Footings: Footings are designed for support reactions of all un-factored loads for corresponding
partial factors of safety for fixed condition.
Columns: Design results from STAAD design modules for fixed supports at foundation level for the
severest case among the inactions. Columns are grouped according to size and sub-grouped
according to area of steel.
Beams: Design results from STAAD design modules for the severest case among the inactions.
Beams are grouped according to span, cross section and support conditions.
Slabs: Slabs are designed as One-way/Two-way as per the coefficients given in IS-456: 2000.
Materials specifications
Concrete Grade: M35
Reinforcement Steel: Steel reinforcement shall be High Strength Deformed Bars of grade Fe-500D of
TMT Type conforming to IS: 1786-2008
Nominal cover to reinforcement:
1. Foundations : 50 mm
2. Columns : 40 mm
3. Beams : 40 mm
4. Slabs : 35 mm
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
4.1. Design Loads and combinations:

The structure is designed for the forces and moments resulted under the effect of intended
design loads. In the structural design, dead, imposed and wind loads and forces such as those
caused by earthquake, as per the relevant Indian Standards.
The structural members will be analysed and designed taking into consideration the
probability of various service loads acting together during the construction stage and after
occupation. As per Clause 18.2.1 of IS 456: 2000, the limit state method of design will be followed
for the design of all the structural members, as per this method, the design loads will be arrived at
using partial safety factors for various inactions as per Table 18 to IS 456: 2000.
Serviceability
1- 1.0 Dead + 1.0 Live
2 - 1.0 Dead + 1.0 Wind X
3 - 1.0 Dead + 1.0 Wind Z
4 - 1.0 Dead + 1.0 EqX
5 - 1.0 Dead + 1.0 EqZ
6 - 1 Dead + 0.8 Live + 0.8 Wind X
7 - 1 Dead + 0.8 Live + 0.8 Wind Z
8 - 1.0 Dead + 0.8 Live +0.8 EqZ
9 - 1.0 Dead + 0.8 Live + 0.8 EqZ
Collapsibility
1- 1.5 Dead + 1.5 Live
2- 1.2 Dead + 1.2 Live + 1.2 Wind X
3 - 1.2 Dead + 1.2 Live + 1.2 Wind Z
4 - 1.2 Dead + 1.2 Live + 1.2 EqX
5 - 1.2 Dead + 1.2 Live + 1.2 EqZ
6 - 1.5 Dead + 1.5 Wind X
7 - 1.5 Dead + 1.5 Wind Z
8 - 1.5 Dead + 1.5 EqX
9 - 1.5 Dead + 1.5 EqZ
10 - 0.9 Dead + 1.5 Wind X
11 - 0.9 Dead + 1.5 Wind Z
12 - 0.9 Dead + 1.5 EqX
13 - 0.9 Dead + 1.5 EqZ
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
4.2 Design Load Calculations:

Dead Load Calculations:-

Density of Brick wall - 20 kN/m3
Density of Plaster - 21 kN/m3
Floor Finish - 1.5kN/m2
Load Calculation for Wall:
Brick wall Calculation
External wall 230 mm thick
0.20 X (3.35-0.45) X 20 + 0.04 X (3.35-0.45) X 21= 14.03 ~ 14.1 kN/m.

External wall 230 mm thick, up to lintel level

0.23 X (2.1) X 18 + 0.04 X (2.1) X 21) = 10.45~ 10.5 kN/m.

External wall 230 mm thick, above lintel level

0.23 X(3.35-2.1-0.3-0.45) X 18 + 0.04 X (3.35-2.1-0.3-0.45) X 21 = 2.49 ~ 2.5kN/m.

Slab Load
0.125 X 25 + 1.5 (Floor Finish)= 4.625 kN/m2
600 mm Wide Chajja Load
SLAB LOAD 0.125 X 25 X 0.6 = 1.87 kN/m
900 mm Wide Chajja Load
SLAB LOAD 0.125 X 25 X 0.9 = 2.81 kN/m
Live Load Calculations:-
Inaccessible Terrace =0.75 kN/m

4.3 Wind Loads:

The wind forces and their effects are taken into account while designing buildings, structures and
components thereof, as per IS 875 (Part 3). Basic wind speed and remaining parameters are
considered based on tender DBR.

Wind load data:

Type of building STORAGE ACCN
Total height of building 3.8 m
Basic wind speed 50 m/s
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
 Risk coefficient (k1) 1.0
Terrain multiplying factor (k2) 1.05
Topography factor (k3) 1.0
Importance factor for Cyclonic Region (k4) 1
Design wind speed (VZ) = (Vb x k1k2 k3k4) 56.7m/s
Design wind pressure (PZ) at height = 0.6 (VZ)2 1.9KN/m2
Wind Directionality factor (Kd) 0.9
Area Averaging factor (Ka) 0.9
combination factor (Kc) 0.9
Design wind pressure (Pd)= (Kd *ka * kc* PZ) 1.41 kN/m2

4.4 Earthquake Forces:

The earthquake forces are calculated in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1). The seismic zone is
considered as Zone III with moderate seismic intensity. Importance factor of 1.5, Special moment
resisting frame (R=5) Damping of 5% critical is considered for determining the design horizontal
seismic coefficients considered as specified in Tender.
Seismic load data for Zone-III
Type of Building HIG

X-Dirn Z-Dirn
h Height of building from G.L in m 5.8 3.8
d Maximum base dimension of building in m 27.8 9.8
Z Zone factor 0.1 0.1
I The factor depending upon the importance of the structure 1.5 1.5
R Response reduction factor, depending on the perceived seismic 5.0 5.0
damage performance of the structure, characterized by ductile or
brittle deformations
T Avg. fundamental time period (seconds) of the structure in seconds 0.216 0.216
T=0.075 h0.75
Sa/g Average response acceleration coefficient for soft soil sites (N< 30), 2.5 2.5
based on appropriate natural periods and damping of the structure
(1/T)
Design hz. seismic coefficient (Ah) = (Z/2) x (I/R) x (Sa/g) 0.06 0.06

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

4.5 Environmental Conditions & Fire Protection.
(a) Environment Exposure Conditions.

Exposure Classification
Members in contact with the ground Very Severe
Members in interior environments Severe
Members in above-ground exterior environments Severe

(b).Fire Protection.

(i) Type of Construction: Type-2 fire rating. Minimum concrete cover and member
dimensions requiredfor fire rating as per Cl.21.1, 21.2 in IS456-2000 and NBC-2016.
Minimum
Minimum Minimum
strength of
Element / Location Cover Thickness
concrete - Fck
(mm) (mm)
(N/mm2)

Concretecast against and 50 200 35

permanently exposed to earth
Concrete exposed to weather
and not in contact with ground
a) RC slabs 35 150 35

b) Beams 40 200 35

c) RC columns 40 200 35

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

5.0 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN.
The structural analysisfor the sub-structure and super structure of the Storage AccnBuilding and
the design and detailing of the structure has been carried out as per the following considerations: -

(a) Static Method is used for the seismic analysis to have the seismic effect for entire building.

(b) Based on the Seismic analysis and Wind analysis for higher value of load combinations,
the design and detailing are carried out for the structural elements like Footing, Plinth
Beams, Floor Beams, Roof Beam, Roof slab.

(c) Isolated footing design is carried as per IS Code 456:2000.

(d) All the Footings are analysed in RCDC for the critical load combination obtained from
STAAD.

(e) Superstructures are analysed in the STAAD Pro and later detailed in RCDC. The Plinth
beam, Roof beam of reinforcements are designed and detailed in RCDC as per IS Code
456:2000 & IS 13920:2016.

(f) One-way slab and Two-way slab have been designed and analysed in STAAD and later
detailed in RCDC as per IS 456:2000 and SP34.

5.1 TYPICAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF FOOTING

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

Design Code : IS 456 : 2000 + IS 13920 : 2016

Footing No : FC3

Column No : C3 ( 600mm X 300mm)

Analysis No : 33

Concrete Grade : M35 N/sqmm

Steel Grade : Fe500 N/sqmm

Clear Cover : 50 mm

Df : 1.5 M

Dw : 1M

Density of Soil = 18 kN/cum

Soil Bearing Capacity = 100 kN/sqm

Permissible SBC Increase for EQ = 25 %

Permissible SBC Increase for Wind = 25 %

Live Load Reduction = 50 %

Permissible area of loss of contact = 0 %

Design cross section by : Average pressure

Footing Type : Pad

Footing Size (L x B x D) : 2100mm X 1800mm X 325mm

Without considering Effect of Water

Table

Footing Self Wt., F1 = 30.71 kN

Soil Weight, S1 = 0.00 kN

Total Weight, W1 = F1 + S1

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

 = 30.71 kN

Offset Along L (Loff) = 750 mm

Offset Along B (Boff) = 750 mm

Check For Maximum Soil Pressure:

Critical Analysis Load Combination = 108

Critical Load Combination = [8] : (LOAD 7: DEAD LOAD) -(LOAD 1: EQ+X)

Pcomb = 177.88 kN

P = Pcomb + W1

P = 208.59 kN

Mx = -71.17 kNm

My = 0.17 kNm

P/A = 55.18 kN/sqm

Mx/Zx = -53.79 kN/sqm

My/Zy = 0.15 kN/sqm

Maximum Soil Pressure = 109.13 kN/sqm

Allowable Soil Pressure = 1.25x100 kN/sqm

= 125 kN/sqm

Check For Minimum Soil Pressure:

Critical Analysis Load Combination = 108

Critical Load Combination = [8] : (LOAD 7: DEAD

LOAD) -(LOAD 1: EQ+X)

Pcomb = 177.88 kN

P = Pcomb + W1

P = 208.59 kN

Mx = -71.17 kNm

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

My = 0.17 kNm

P/A = 55.18 kN/sqm

Mx/Zx = -53.79 kN/sqm

My/Zy = 0.15 kN/sqm

Minimum Soil Pressure = 1.24 kN/sqm

> 0

Design For Bending:

Bottom Reinforcement Along L:

Critical Analysis Load Combination = 216

Critical Load Combination = [75] : 1.5 (LOAD 7: DEAD LOAD) -1.5 (LOAD
1: EQ+X)

Pu = 266.82 kN

Mux = -106.75 kNm

Muy = 0.26 kNm

P/A = 70.59 kN/sqm

Mx/Zx = -80.69 kN/sqm

My/Zy = 0.23 kN/sqm

Deff = 267 mm

Beff = 1800 mm

SPu = 151.28 kN/sqm

Mu = SPu X B X Loff X Loff / 2

= 76.58 kNm

Pt = 0.146 %

Ast Rqd (BM) = 702 sqmm

Ast Prv (Distributed Across Total Width) = 9 - T10 @ 225

= 707 sqmm

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

Bottom Reinforcement Along B:

Critical Analysis Load Combination = 215

Critical Load Combination = [74] : 1.5 (LOAD 7: DEAD LOAD) +1.5 (LOAD
2: EQ+Z)

Pu = 262.5 kN

Mux = -50.06 kNm

Muy = 30.22 kNm

P/A = 69.44 kN/sqm

Mx/Zx = -37.84 kN/sqm

My/Zy = 26.65 kN/sqm

Deff = 251 mm

Leff = 2100 mm

SPu = 96.09 kN/sqm

Mu = SPu X L X Boff X Boff / 2

= 56.75 kNm

Pt = 0.155 %

Ast Rqd (BM) = 819 sqmm

Ast Prv (Distributed Across Total Length) = 11 - T10 @ 210

= 864 sqmm

Design For Shear:

One Way Shear Along L:

Critical Section @ d from Column Face

= 267 mm

Critical Analysis Load Combination = 216

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

Critical Load Combination = [75] : 1.5 (LOAD 7: DEAD LOAD) -1.5 (LOAD
1: EQ+X)

Pu = 266.82 kN

Mux = -106.75 kNm

Muy = 0.26 kNm

P/A = 70.59 kN/sqm

Mx/Zx = -80.69 kN/sqm

My/Zy = 0.23 kN/sqm

Deff = 267 mm

Beff = 1800 mm

SPu = 151.28 kN/sqm

Vu = SPu X (Loff - d) X B

= 131.52 kN

Tv = Vu / (Beff X Deff)

= 0.27 N/sqmm

Tc = 0.29 N/sqmm

Tv < Tc

One Way Shear Along B:

Critical Section @ d from Column Face

= 251 mm

Critical Analysis Load Combination = 215

Critical Load Combination = [74] : 1.5 (LOAD 7: DEAD

LOAD) +1.5 (LOAD 2:
EQ+Z)

Pu = 262.5 kN

Mux = -50.06 kNm

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

Muy = 30.22 kNm

P/A = 69.44 kN/sqm

Mx/Zx = -37.84 kN/sqm

My/Zy = 26.65 kN/sqm

Deff = 251 mm

Leff = 2100 mm

SPu = 96.09 kN/sqm

Vu = SPu X (Boff - d) X L

= 100.70 kN

Tv = Vu / (Leff X Deff)

= 0.19 N/sqmm

Tc = 0.3 N/sqmm

Tv < Tc

Design For Punching Shear:

Critical Section @ d/2 from Column Face

= 130 mm

Critical Analysis Load Combination = 201

Critical Load Combination = [60] : 1.5 (LOAD 7: DEAD LOAD) +1.5 (LOAD
8: LIVE LOAD)

Pu = 275.41 kN

Mux = -56.83 kNm

Muy = 0.37 kNm

P/A = 72.86 kN/sqm

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

Mx/Zx = -42.95 kN/sqm

My/Zy = 0.33 kN/sqm

Deff = 259 mm

Leff = 859 mm

Beff = 559 mm

Punching Perimeter = 2836 mm

Punching Area = 734524 sqmm

SPu = Average Pressure

= 72.86 kN/sqm

Vu = SPu X ((L X B)-(Leff X Beff))

= 240.42 kN

Tv = Vu / Punching Area

= 0.327 N/sqmm

Tc = 1.479 N/sqmm

Tv < Tc

Load Transfer Check For Load Transfer From Column To Footing

Critical Analysis Load Combination = 201

Critical Load Combination = [60] : 1.5 (LOAD 7: DEAD

LOAD) +1.5 (LOAD 8: LIVE
LOAD)

Pu = 275.41 kN

A2 = 0.18 sqm

A1 = 3.04 sqm

Base Area = 3.78 sqm

A1 < Base Area

Modification Factor = SquareRoot(A1/A2) < = 2

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

SquareRoot(A1/A2) = 4.1096

Thus, Modification Factor = 2

Concrete Bearing Capacity = 0.45 X Fck X Modification Factor X Column

Area

= 5670 kN

Concrete Bearing Capacity > Pu, Hence Safe.

5.2 TYPICAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF COLUMN

Column No.
: C1
Level : -2 m To 0.45 m
Frame Type = Lateral
Response Reduction Factor = 5
Design Code = IS 456 : 2000 + IS 13920 : 2016
Grade Of Concrete = M35 N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel (Main) = Fe500D N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel (Shear) = Fe500D N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel - Flexural Design = Fe500D N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel - Shear Design = Fe500D N/sqmm
Column B = 300 mm
Column D = 450 mm
Clear Cover = 40 mm
Clear Floor Height @ B = 2150 mm
Clear Floor Height @ D = 2150 mm
No Of Floors = 1
No Of Columns In Group = 1
Column Type : UnBraced
Minimum eccentricity check : One Axis at a Time
Code defined D/B ratio : 4
1.5 <= 4 Hence, Design as
D/B Ratio :
Column

Flexural Design (Analysis Forces)

Analysis Reference No. = 11

Critical Analysis Load : 216

Combination
[33] : 1.5 (LOAD 7:
Load Combination = DEAD LOAD) -1.5
(LOAD 1: EQ+X)
Bottom
Critical Location =
Joint
Pu = 207.73 kN
Mux = -4.81 kNm
Muy = -32.34 kNm

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

 Vux = -20.61 kN
Vuy = 5.93 kN

Effective Length Calculation

Calculation Along Major Axis Of Column
Beam Sizes Beam Stiffness
Column Beam 1 Beam 2
Joint (Length x (Length x Beta
Stiffness Beam 1 Beam 2
Width x Width x
Depth) Depth)
N-m x N-m x
N-m x 10^6 mm mm
10^6 10^6
Bottom 110.021 No Beam No Beam - - 1
3230 x 300
Top 110.021 No Beam - 24.727 0.906
x 300

Sway Condition (as per Stability

= Non Sway
Index)
Effective Length Factor along
= 0.96
Major Axis

Calculation Along Minor Axis Of Column

Beam Sizes Beam Stiffness
Column Beam 1 Beam 2
Joint (Length x (Length x Beta
Stiffness Beam 1 Beam 2
Width x Width x
Depth) Depth)
N-m x N-m x
N-m x 10^6 mm mm
10^6 10^6
Bottom 48.898 No Beam No Beam - - 1
4530 x 300
Top 48.898 No Beam 17.631 - 0.857
x 300

Sway Condition (as per Stability

= Non Sway
Index)
Effective Length Factor along
= 0.95
Minor axis

Minimum Eccentricity Check

Since Axial Force is compressive, Min. Eccentricity check to be performed
Most critical case is with Min. Eccentricity check in X-direction
Minimum Eccentricity Along D:
Unsupported Length / 500 + D /
Minimum Eccentricity =
30
= 19.3 mm
Mminx = Pu x Minimum Eccentricity
= 4.15 kNm
Slenderness Check
Max Slenderness Ratio(L/B) = 7.17
< 60 (Hence Ok)
Column Is Unbraced Along D
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
 Slenderness Check Along D:
Effective Length Factor = 0.96
Slenderness Ratio = Effective Length / D
4.59, Column not Slender Along
=
D
Column Is Unbraced Along B
Slenderness Check Along B:
Effective Length Factor = 0.95
Slenderness Ratio = Effective Length / B
6.81, Column Not Slender Along
=
B

Calculation of Design Moment

Mmin Mslndx Mdesign-
Direction Manalysis Mdesign
(Abs) (Abs) final
A B C E F
Major Axis - Mux -4.81 4.15 -4.81 0 -4.81
Minor Axis - Muy -32.34 --- -32.34 0 -32.34

Wher
e
A = Moments directly from analysis
B = Moments due to minimum eccentricity
C = Maximum of analysis moment and min. eccentricity = Max (A,B)
E = Moment due to slenderness effect
F = Final design Moment = Max(C- Top Bottom , D- Top Bottom) + E

Final Critical Design Forces

Pu = 207.73 kN
Mux = -4.81 kNm
Muy = -32.34 kNm

Resultant Moment (Combined Action)

Moment Capacity Check
Pt Calculated = 0.84
Reinforcement Provided = 10-T12
Load Angle = Tan-1(Muy/Mux)
= 81.54 deg
MRes = 32.69 kNm
MCap = 78.93 kNm
Capacity Ratio = MRes/ MCap
= 0.41 <= 1

Beam Table For Shear Along

B & Shear Along D
Level = 0.45 m
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
 Analysis Reference Number = C1

Beam Bea Torsi Moment Capacity Moment Capacity Resultant

Size m on Beam @ Top Beam @ Bottom Moment
angl mom
e ent
w.r.t.
colu
mn
Ly
Astre Ast Mu Astre Ast Mu Top Top Bot Bot
Mu Mu
q pro cap q pro cap Ly Lx Ly Lx
(kN (kN
(mm) (deg) (kNm) (sqm (sqm (kN (sqm (sqm (kN (kN (kN (kN (kN
m) m)
m) m) m) m) m) m) m) m) m) m)
300x3 42.6 427.6 45.6 235.6 25.8 45.6 25.8
270 0.04 452.4 0 213.8 0 0
00 6 1 7 2 3 7 3
300x3 26.8 260.5 314.1 33.0 212.9 235.6 25.6 33.0 25.6
180 0.06 0 0 0
00 6 4 6 2 8 2 9 2 9

Effective moment for Column

Mu Major (Along D) (kNm) Mu Minor (Along B) (kNm)
Left Right Left Right
Top 33.02 0 45.67 0
Bottom 25.69 0 25.83 0

Shear Calculation Along D Along B

Height of column 1050 900
above level
considered (hst1)
(mm)
Height of column 1075 1075
below level
considered (hst2)
(mm)
Height (hst) (mm) 2425 2275
Sway Right 1.4 x (Left,Bottom + Right,Top) / hst
Vu1 (kN) 14.83 15.89
Sway Left 1.4 x (Left,Top + Right,Bottom) / hst
Vu2 (kN) 19.06 28.1
Critical Analysis 222 222
Load
Combination
Critical Load [39] : 0.9 (LOAD 7: [39] : 0.9 (LOAD 7:
Combination DEAD LOAD) +1.5 DEAD LOAD) +1.5
(LOAD 1: EQ+X) (LOAD 1: EQ+X)
Design shear force, 3.4307 6.3217
Vu (kN)
Design shear, 19.06 28.1
Maximum(Vu,Vu1,V
u2)
Pu (kN) 93.71 93.71

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

Deff , Beff (mm) 404 254
Aeff (sqmm) 121200 114300
Design shear Vu / (B x Deff) Vu / (D x Beff)
stress, Tv
Tv (N/sqmm) 0.1573 0.2459
Pt (%) 0.419 0.419
Design shear 0.4664 0.4664
strength, Tc
(N/sqmm)
Shear Strength 1 + 3 x Pu / ( B x D x Fck)
Enhancement
Factor
(Compressive
Force)
1.0663 1.0703
Shear Strength - -
Enhancement
Factor (Tensile
Force)
Shear Strength 1.5 1.5
Enhancement
Factor (max)
Shear Strength 1.0663 1.0703
Enhancement
Factor
Enhanced shear 0.4973 0.4992
strength, Tc-e
(N/sqmm)
Design shear check Tv< Tc x Tv< Tc x
Enhancement Enhancement
factor factor
Shear Links Shear Links Not Shear Links Not
Design Required Required

Design Of Links

Links in the zone where special confining links are not required

Normal Links

Diameter of link =8 mm
>Max. longitudinal bar dia / 4
=3 mm
Criterion for spacing of normal
links
Min. Longitudinal Bar dia X 16 =192 mm
Min. dimension of column =300 mm
Max. 300 mm =300 mm
Least lateral edge dimension/2 =150
Provided spacing =150 mm

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

 Special confining
reinforcement as per IS 13920
- 2016
6 x Smallest Longitudinal Bar Dia =6 x 12
=72 mm
Hence Link Spacing S, =60 mm
Hoop dimension, h =128.67 mm
Gross area of column, Ag =B x D
sqm
=135000
m
(B- 2 x cover to Link) x (D- 2
Core area of column, Ak =
x cover to Link)
sqm
=91096
m
(0.18 x S x h x (Fck/Fy) x
Area of special confining link, Ash1 =
(Ag/Ak-1))
sqm
=46.88
m
Area of special confining link, Ash2 =(0.05 x S x h x (Fck/Fy) )
sqm
=27.02
m
Area of special confining link, Ash =Maximum (Ash1,Ash2)
sqm
=46.88
m
Diameter of special confining link =8 mm
=> Max. longitudinal bar dia / 4
=3 mm
Zone for special confining links -
criterion
Max. Size of column,D =450 mm
Clear height/6 =358.33 mm
Minimum value =450 mm

Hence length of confining zone =450 mm

Table For Links

Required Provided
Normal Shear Ductile Normal
Ductile Zone
Design Design Design Zone
Link Dia. 8 --- 8 8 8
Spacing 150 --- 60 150 60

General Data
Column No. : C1
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
 Level : 0.45 m To 2.55 m
Frame Type = Lateral
Response Reduction Factor = 5
Design Code = IS 456 : 2000 + IS 13920 : 2016
Grade Of Concrete = M35 N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel (Main) = Fe500D N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel (Shear) = Fe500D N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel - Flexural Design = Fe500D N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel - Shear Design = Fe500D N/sqmm
Column B = 300 mm
Column D = 450 mm
Clear Cover = 40 mm
Clear Floor Height @ B = 1800 mm
Clear Floor Height @ D = 2100 mm
No Of Floors = 1
No Of Columns In Group = 1
Column Type : UnBraced
Minimum eccentricity check : One Axis at a Time
Code defined D/B ratio : 4
1.5 <= 4 Hence, Design as
D/B Ratio :
Column

Flexural Design (Analysis Forces)

Analysis Reference No. = 15

Critical Analysis Load : 216

Combination
[33] : 1.5 (LOAD 7:
Load Combination = DEAD LOAD) -1.5
(LOAD 1: EQ+X)
Bottom
Critical Location =
Joint
Pu = 107.68 kN
Mux = -11.48 kNm
Muy = -24.41 kNm
Vux = -20.5 kN
Vuy = 7.1 kN

Effective Length Calculation

Calculation Along Major Axis Of Column
Beam Sizes Beam Stiffness
Column Beam 1 Beam 2
Joint (Length x (Length x Beta
Stiffness Beam 1 Beam 2
Width x Width x
Depth) Depth)
N-m x N-m x
N-m x 10^6 mm mm
10^6 10^6
3230 x 300
Bottom 128.358 No Beam - 24.727 0.906
x 300
Top 128.358 No Beam No Beam - - 1

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

 Sway Condition (as per Stability
= Non Sway
Index)
Effective Length Factor along
= 0.96
Major Axis

Calculation Along Minor Axis Of Column

Beam Sizes Beam Stiffness
Column Beam 1 Beam 2
Joint (Length x (Length x Beta
Stiffness Beam 1 Beam 2
Width x Width x
Depth) Depth)
N-m x N-m x
N-m x 10^6 mm mm
10^6 10^6
4530 x 300
Bottom 57.048 No Beam 17.631 - 0.857
x 300
4530 x 230
Top 57.048 No Beam 13.517 - 0.919
x 300

Sway Condition (as per Stability

= Non Sway
Index)
Effective Length Factor along
= 0.92
Minor axis

Minimum Eccentricity Check

Since Axial Force is compressive, Min. Eccentricity check to be performed
Most critical case is with Min. Eccentricity check in X-direction
Minimum Eccentricity Along D:
Unsupported Length / 500 + D /
Minimum Eccentricity =
30
= 19.2 mm
Mminx = Pu x Minimum Eccentricity
= 2.15 kNm
Slenderness Check
Max Slenderness Ratio(L/B) = 6
< 60 (Hence Ok)
Column Is Unbraced Along D
Slenderness Check Along D:
Effective Length Factor = 0.96
Slenderness Ratio = Effective Length / D
4.48, Column not Slender Along
=
D
Column Is Unbraced Along B
Slenderness Check Along B:
Effective Length Factor = 0.92
Slenderness Ratio = Effective Length / B
5.52, Column Not Slender Along
=
B

Calculation of Design Moment

Direction Manalysis Mmin Mdesign Mslndx Mdesign-
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
 (Abs) (Abs) final
A B C E F
Major Axis - Mux -11.48 2.15 -11.48 0 -11.48
Minor Axis - Muy -24.41 --- -24.41 0 -24.41

Wher
e
A = Moments directly from analysis
B = Moments due to minimum eccentricity
C = Maximum of analysis moment and min. eccentricity = Max (A,B)
E = Moment due to slenderness effect
F = Final design Moment = Max(C- Top Bottom , D- Top Bottom) + E

Final Critical Design Forces

Pu = 107.68 kN
Mux = -11.48 kNm
Muy = -24.41 kNm

Resultant Moment (Combined Action)

Moment Capacity Check
Pt Calculated = 0.84
Reinforcement Provided = 10-T12
Load Angle = Tan-1(Muy/Mux)
= 64.81 deg
MRes = 26.97 kNm
MCap = 76.7 kNm
Capacity Ratio = MRes/ MCap
= 0.35 <= 1

Beam Table For Shear Along

B & Shear Along D
Level = 2.55 m
Analysis Reference Number = C1

Beam Bea Torsi Moment Capacity Moment Capacity Resultant

Size m on Beam @ Top Beam @ Bottom Moment
angl mom
e ent
w.r.t.
colu
mn
Ly
Astre Ast Mu Astre Ast Mu Top Top Bot Bot
Mu Mu
q pro cap q pro cap Ly Lx Ly Lx
(kN (kN
(mm) (deg) (kNm) (sqm (sqm (kN (sqm (sqm (kN (kN (kN (kN (kN
m) m)
m) m) m) m) m) m) m) m) m) m)
230x3 270 0.03 22.1 215.9 235.6 24.8 0 163.2 235.6 24.8 0 24.8 0 24.8
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
 00 9 2 2 2 8 2 2 2 2

Effective moment for Column

Mu Major (Along D) (kNm) Mu Minor (Along B) (kNm)
Left Right Left Right
Top 0 0 24.82 0
Bottom 0 0 24.82 0

Shear Calculation Along D Along B

Height of column 400 400
above level
considered (hst1)
(mm)
Height of column 1050 900
below level
considered (hst2)
(mm)
Height (hst) (mm) 1450 1600
Sway Right 1.4 x (Left,Bottom + Right,Top) / hst
Vu1 (kN) 0 21.72
Sway Left 1.4 x (Left,Top + Right,Bottom) / hst
Vu2 (kN) 0 21.72
Critical Analysis 213 222
Load
Combination
Critical Load [30] : 1.5 (LOAD 7: [39] : 0.9 (LOAD 7:
Combination DEAD LOAD) +1.5 DEAD LOAD) +1.5
(LOAD 6: WIND (- (LOAD 1: EQ+X)
Z) IS875 RECT
CLAD)
Design shear force, 10.8397 3.2489
Vu (kN)
Design shear, 10.84 21.72
Maximum(Vu,Vu1,V
u2)
Pu (kN) 93.23 42.96
Deff , Beff (mm) 404 254
Aeff (sqmm) 121200 114300
Design shear Vu / (B x Deff) Vu / (D x Beff)
stress, Tv
Tv (N/sqmm) 0.0894 0.19
Pt (%) 0.419 0.419
Design shear 0.4664 0.4664
strength, Tc
(N/sqmm)
Shear Strength 1 + 3 x Pu / ( B x D x Fck)
Enhancement
Factor
(Compressive
Force)

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

 1.0659 1.0322
Shear Strength - -
Enhancement
Factor (Tensile
Force)
Shear Strength 1.5 1.5
Enhancement
Factor (max)
Shear Strength 1.0659 1.0322
Enhancement
Factor
Enhanced shear 0.4972 0.4814
strength, Tc-e
(N/sqmm)
Design shear check Tv< Tc x Tv< Tc x
Enhancement Enhancement
factor factor
Shear Links Shear Links Not Shear Links Not
Design Required Required

Design Of Links

Links in the zone where special confining links are not required

Normal Links

Diameter of link =8 mm
>Max. longitudinal bar dia / 4
=3 mm
Criterion for spacing of normal
links
Min. Longitudinal Bar dia X 16 =192 mm
Min. dimension of column =300 mm
Max. 300 mm =300 mm
Least lateral edge dimension/2 =150
Provided spacing =150 mm

Special confining
reinforcement as per IS 13920
- 2016
6 x Smallest Longitudinal Bar Dia =6 x 12
=72 mm
Hence Link Spacing S, =60 mm
Hoop dimension, h =128.67 mm
Gross area of column, Ag =B x D
sqm
=135000
m
(B- 2 x cover to Link) x (D- 2
Core area of column, Ak =
x cover to Link)
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
 sqm
=91096
m
(0.18 x S x h x (Fck/Fy) x
Area of special confining link, Ash1 =
(Ag/Ak-1))
sqm
=46.88
m
Area of special confining link, Ash2 =(0.05 x S x h x (Fck/Fy) )
sqm
=27.02
m
Area of special confining link, Ash =Maximum (Ash1,Ash2)
sqm
=46.88
m
Diameter of special confining link =8 mm
=> Max. longitudinal bar dia / 4
=3 mm
Zone for special confining links -
criterion
Max. Size of column,D =450 mm
Clear height/6 =350 mm
Minimum value =450 mm

Hence length of confining zone =450 mm

Table For Links

Required Provided
Normal Shear Ductile Normal
Ductile Zone
Design Design Design Zone
Link Dia. 8 --- 8 8 8
Spacing 150 --- 60 150 60

General Data
Column No. : C1
Level : 2.55 m To 3.8 m
Frame Type = Lateral
Response Reduction Factor = 5
Design Code = IS 456 : 2000 + IS 13920 : 2016
Grade Of Concrete = M35 N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel (Main) = Fe500D N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel (Shear) = Fe500D N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel - Flexural Design = Fe500D N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel - Shear Design = Fe500D N/sqmm
Column B = 300 mm
Column D = 450 mm
Clear Cover = 40 mm
Clear Floor Height @ B = 800 mm
Clear Floor Height @ D = 800 mm
No Of Floors = 1
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
 No Of Columns In Group = 1
Column Type : UnBraced
Minimum eccentricity check : One Axis at a Time
Code defined D/B ratio : 4
1.5 <= 4 Hence, Design as
D/B Ratio :
Column

Flexural Design (Analysis Forces)

Analysis Reference No. = 28

Critical Analysis Load : 216

Combination
[33] : 1.5 (LOAD 7:
Load Combination = DEAD LOAD) -1.5
(LOAD 1: EQ+X)
Critical Location = Top Joint
Pu = 69.04 kN
Mux = 12.29 kNm
Muy = 41 kNm
Vux = -35.65 kN
Vuy = 7.1 kN

Effective Length Calculation

Calculation Along Major Axis Of Column
Beam Sizes Beam Stiffness
Column Beam 1 Beam 2
Joint (Length x (Length x Beta
Stiffness Beam 1 Beam 2
Width x Width x
Depth) Depth)
N-m x N-m x
N-m x 10^6 mm mm
10^6 10^6
Bottom 215.641 No Beam No Beam - - 1
3230 x 300
Top 215.641 No Beam - 83.452 0.721
x 450

Sway Condition (as per Stability

= Non Sway
Index)
Effective Length Factor along
= 0.9
Major Axis

Calculation Along Minor Axis Of Column

Beam Sizes Beam Stiffness
Column Beam 1 Beam 2
Joint (Length x (Length x Beta
Stiffness Beam 1 Beam 2
Width x Width x
Depth) Depth)
N-m x N-m x
N-m x 10^6 mm mm
10^6 10^6
4530 x 230
Bottom 95.84 No Beam 13.517 - 0.919
x 300
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
 4530 x 300
Top 95.84 No Beam 59.504 - 0.617
x 450

Sway Condition (as per Stability

= Non Sway
Index)
Effective Length Factor along
= 0.83
Minor axis

Minimum Eccentricity Check

Since Axial Force is compressive, Min. Eccentricity check to be performed
Most critical case is with Min. Eccentricity check in X-direction
Minimum Eccentricity Along D:
Unsupported Length / 500 + D /
Minimum Eccentricity =
30
= 16.6 mm
Mminx = Pu x Minimum Eccentricity
= 1.38 kNm
Slenderness Check
Max Slenderness Ratio(L/B) = 2.67
< 60 (Hence Ok)
Column Is Unbraced Along D
Slenderness Check Along D:
Effective Length Factor = 0.9
Slenderness Ratio = Effective Length / D
= 1.6, Column not Slender Along D
Column Is Unbraced Along B
Slenderness Check Along B:
Effective Length Factor = 0.83
Slenderness Ratio = Effective Length / B
2.21, Column Not Slender Along
=
B

Calculation of Design Moment

Mmin Mslndx Mdesign-
Direction Manalysis Mdesign
(Abs) (Abs) final
A B C E F
Major Axis - Mux 12.29 1.38 12.29 0 12.29
Minor Axis - Muy 41 --- 41 0 41

Wher
e
A = Moments directly from analysis
B = Moments due to minimum eccentricity
C = Maximum of analysis moment and min. eccentricity = Max (A,B)
E = Moment due to slenderness effect
F = Final design Moment = Max(C- Top Bottom , D- Top Bottom) + E

Final Critical Design Forces

Pu = 69.04 kN
Mux = 12.29 kNm
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
 Muy = 41 kNm

Resultant Moment (Combined Action)

Moment Capacity Check
Pt Calculated = 1.1
Reinforcement Provided = 4-T16 + 6-T12
Load Angle = Tan-1(Muy/Mux)
= 73.32 deg
MRes = 42.8 kNm
MCap = 85.07 kNm
Capacity Ratio = MRes/ MCap
= 0.5 <= 1

Beam Table For Shear Along

B & Shear Along D
Level = 3.8 m
Analysis Reference Number = C1

Beam Bea Torsi Moment Capacity Moment Capacity Resultant

Size m on Beam @ Top Beam @ Bottom Moment
angl mom
e ent
w.r.t.
colu
mn
Ly
Astre Ast Mu Astre Ast Mu Top Top Bot Bot
Mu Mu
q pro cap q pro cap Ly Lx Ly Lx
(kN (kN
(mm) (deg) (kNm) (sqm (sqm (kN (sqm (sqm (kN (kN (kN (kN (kN
m) m)
m) m) m) m) m) m) m) m) m) m)
300x4 41.1 323.7 57.4 323.7 57.4 57.4 57.4
270 0.05 339.3 0 339.3 0 0
50 2 3 2 3 2 2 2
300x4 21.2 323.7 57.4 323.7 57.4 57.4 57.4
180 0.21 339.3 0.83 339.3 0 0
50 9 3 2 3 2 2 2

Effective moment for Column

Mu Major (Along D) (kNm) Mu Minor (Along B) (kNm)
Left Right Left Right
Top 57.42 0 57.42 0
Bottom 57.42 0 57.42 0

Shear Calculation Along D Along B

Height of column 0 0
above level
considered (hst1)
(mm)

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

Height of column 400 400
below level
considered (hst2)
(mm)
Height (hst) (mm) 850 850
Sway Right 1.4 x (Left,Bottom + Right,Top) / hst
Vu1 (kN) 94.58 94.58
Sway Left 1.4 x (Left,Top + Right,Bottom) / hst
Vu2 (kN) 94.58 94.58
Critical Analysis 222 222
Load
Combination
Critical Load [39] : 0.9 (LOAD 7: [39] : 0.9 (LOAD 7:
Combination DEAD LOAD) +1.5 DEAD LOAD) +1.5
(LOAD 1: EQ+X) (LOAD 1: EQ+X)
Design shear force, 4.141 -8.9751
Vu (kN)
Design shear, 94.58 94.58
Maximum(Vu,Vu1,V
u2)
Pu (kN) 31.04 31.04
Deff , Beff (mm) 402 252
Aeff (sqmm) 120600 113400
Design shear Vu / (B x Deff) Vu / (D x Beff)
stress, Tv
Tv (N/sqmm) 0.7842 0.834
Pt (%) 0.549 0.549
Design shear 0.5232 0.5232
strength, Tc
(N/sqmm)
Shear Strength 1 + 3 x Pu / ( B x D x Fck)
Enhancement
Factor
(Compressive
Force)
1.0221 1.0235
Shear Strength - -
Enhancement
Factor (Tensile
Force)
Shear Strength 1.5 1.5
Enhancement
Factor (max)
Shear Strength 1.0221 1.0235
Enhancement
Factor
Enhanced shear 0.5347 0.5354
strength, Tc-e
(N/sqmm)
Design shear check Tv> Tc x Tv> Tc x
Enhancement Enhancement
factor factor
Shear Links Shear Links Shear Links
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
Design Required Required
Pt % 0.549 0.549
Shear resisted by (Tc-e) x (B x Deff) (Tc-e) x (D x Beff)
concrete Vc (kN)
64.34 60.5
Shear to be Vu - Vc
resisted by shear
reinforcement =
Vus (kN)
30.24 34.08
Area of shear (Vus x 1000) / (Vus x 1000) /
reinforcement (Deff x 0.87 x Fy) (Beff x 0.87 x Fy)
required, Asv
(sqmm)
208.36 374.6
Master Link Rebar 8 8
(mm)
Number of legs 3 4
provided
Spacing of links 723 536
reqd (mm)
Spacing of links 150 150
prvd, Sv (mm)
Asv Provided 1005.31 1340.41
(sqmm)

Design Of Links

Links in the zone where special confining links are not required

Normal Links

Diameter of link =8 mm
>Max. longitudinal bar dia / 4
=4 mm
Criterion for spacing of normal
links
Min. Longitudinal Bar dia X 16 =192 mm
Min. dimension of column =300 mm
Max. 300 mm =300 mm
Least lateral edge dimension/2 =150
Provided spacing =150 mm

Special confining
reinforcement as per IS 13920
- 2016
6 x Smallest Longitudinal Bar Dia =6 x 12
=72 mm
Hence Link Spacing S, =60 mm
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
 Hoop dimension, h =128.67 mm
Gross area of column, Ag =B x D
sqm
=135000
m
(B- 2 x cover to Link) x (D- 2
Core area of column, Ak =
x cover to Link)
sqm
=91096
m
(0.18 x S x h x (Fck/Fy) x
Area of special confining link, Ash1 =
(Ag/Ak-1))
sqm
=46.88
m
Area of special confining link, Ash2 =(0.05 x S x h x (Fck/Fy) )
sqm
=27.02
m
Area of special confining link, Ash =Maximum (Ash1,Ash2)
sqm
=46.88
m
Diameter of special confining link =8 mm
=> Max. longitudinal bar dia / 4
=4 mm
Zone for special confining links -
criterion
Max. Size of column,D =450 mm
Clear height/6 =133.33 mm
Minimum value =450 mm

Since length of Confining >Clear height/2

Length of confining zone =Clear height/2
=400 mm

Table For Links

Required Provided
Normal Shear Ductile Normal
Ductile Zone
Design Design Design Zone
Link Dia. 8 --- 8 8 8
Spacing 150 --- 60 150 60

5.3 TYPICAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF BEAM

Beam No : B1

Analysis Reference 22 (0.45

:
(Member) m)
Beam Length : 4530 mm
Breadth (B) : 300 mm
Depth (D) : 300 mm

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

 Effective Depth (d) : 250 mm
Design Code : IS 456 : 2000 + IS 13920 : 2016
Beam Type : Ductile Beam
Grade Of Concrete (Fck) : M35 N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel (Main) : Fe500D N/sqmm
Grade Of Steel (Shear) : Fe500D N/sqmm
Top/Bottom Clear Cover
: 40 mm
(Cmin)
Side Clear Cover : 40 mm
Es : 2x10^5 N/sqmm
Ptnominal (%) (Bn) : 0.2 %

Flexure Design
Beam Bottom Beam Top
Left Mid Right Left Mid Right
Critical L/C - Analysis 214 216 216 216 224 214
Critical L/C - RCDC 31 33 33 33 41 31
Mu (kNm) 11.21 18.13 11.21 42.66 2.58 42.66
Tu (kNm) 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
MTu (kNm) 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
Mud (kNm) 11.25 18.16 11.25 42.7 2.61 42.7
MuLim (kNm) 87 87 87 87 87 87
R 0.6 0.969 0.6 2.277 0.139 2.277
Ptmin (%) (A) 0.284 0.284 0.284 0.284 0.284 0.284
Ptclc (%) (B') 0.302 0.284 0.302 0.57 0.284 0.57
Pcclc (%) (C) 0 0 0 0 0 0
PtPrv (%) 0.452 0.452 0.452 0.603 0.603 0.603
Ast (sqmm) 212.98 212.98 212.98 427.61 212.98 427.61
AstDuctile (sqmm) (E) 226.2 113.1 226.2 113.1 113.1 113.1
AstFinal (Max(Ast, 226.2 212.98 226.2 427.61 212.98 427.61
AstDuctile)) (sqmm)
AstPrv (sqmm) 339.3 339.3 339.3 452.4 452.4 452.4
Reinforcement 3-T12 3-T12 3-T12 4-T12 4-T12 4-T12
Provided

Note: Calculation of Ast

AstCalc = Max {B',C} x B X d (for Mu > 0 )

AstCalc = Bn x B X d (for Mu = 0)
Where,
A = Ptmin = Min % area of flexural reinforcement
Maximum of % reinforcement required
B' = Ptclc = for Bending Moment and Min % area of
flexural reinforcement (A)
Bn = Ptnominal = Nominal % area of reinforcement
% area of compression reinforcement
C = Pcclc =
required
Area of reinforcement required for
D = AstCrack =
Crackwidth

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

 Area of reinforcement as per ductile
E = AstDuctile =
detailing requirements
Ductile Detailing <>
AstDuctile - Bottom (left Max(50% of Ast provided at top, 25% of
<> =
& Right) max Ast provided from all zones)
AstDuctile - Top (left &
Right), Bottom (Mid) & <> = 25% of max Ast provided from all zones
Top (Mid)

Shear Design
Left Mid Right
Critical L/C - Analysis 216 216 214
Critical L/C - RCDC 33 33 31
PtPrv (%) 0.603 0.603 0.603
Vu (kN) 48.03 33.73 48.03
Tu (kNm) 0.03 0.03 0.03
VTu (kN) 0.17 0.17 0.17
Vut (kN) 48.2 33.9 48.2
VD+L (kN) 34.32 22.88 34.32
Mh (kNm) 44.94 44.94
Ms (kNm) 34.5 34.5
Sway-Right (kN) 8.02 49.17 60.61
Sway-Left (kN) 60.61 3.41 8.02
Vu-Sway (kN) 60.61 49.17 60.61
Vud (kN) 60.61 49.17 60.61
Tv (N/sqmm) 0.81 0.66 0.81
Tc (N/sqmm) 0 0 0
Vc (kN) 0 0 0
Vus=Vud-Vc (kN) 60.61 49.17 60.61
Legs 2 2 2
Stirrup Rebar 8 8 8
Asv Torsion (sqmm) 257.815 181.657 257.815
Asv Torsion Prv (sqmm) 1675.67 804.32 1675.67
AsvReqd (sqmm/m) 671.47 544.74 671.47
SvCalc (mm) 60 125 60
SvPrv (mm) 60 125 60
Asv Total Prv (sqmm) 1675.67 804.32 1675.67

Maximum Spacing Criteria

Basic
Spc1 =0.75d = 188 mm
Spc2 = 300 mm

For Torsion
(X1 = 230, Y1 =
230)

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

 Spc3 = X1 = 230 mm
Spc4=(X1+Y1)/4 = 115 mm

For Ductility
Left Section
Spc5 = d / 4 = 62 mm

Spc6 = 6 x Small Longitudinal = 70 mm

Dia
Spc7 = 100 mm

Mid Section
Spc5 = d / 2 = 125 mm

Right Section
Spc5 = d / 4 = 62 mm

Spc6 = 6 x Small Longitudinal = 70 mm

Dia
Spc7 = 100 mm

SFR Design

Beam Width =300 mm

Beam Depth =300 mm
300 <=
Web Depth = mm
750
Side Face Reinforcement not
required.

5.4 TYPICAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF SLAB

Slab No. : S1
Level = 3.8 m
IS 456 :
2000 + IS
Design Code =
13920 :
2016
Grade Of Concrete = M35
Grade Of Steel = Fe500D
Clear Cover = 35.000 mm
Long Span, Ly = 4.530 m
Short Span, Lx = 3.230 m
Imposed Load = 1.500 kN/sqm
Live Load = 1.000 kN/sqm
Slab Thickness = 125.000 mm
Effective Depth Along LX,
= 85.000 mm
Deffx
Effective Depth Along LY,
= 75.000 mm
Deffy
Self Weight = 3.125 kN/sqm

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

 Total Load, TL = 5.625 kN/sqm
Span = 2-Way
Panel Type = Four Edges Discontinuous
Design Moments:
Short Span Positive Moment At Midspan -
Moment Coefficient = 0.087
BM = 5.113 kNm
Mu = 1.5 X BM = 7.669 kNm
Area Of Reinforcement
= 215.248 sqmm/m
Required (Mu)
Area Of Reinforcement
= 236.498 sqmm/m
Required (Mu + Defl.)
Reinforcement Provided = T8 @ 210 C/C
= 239.000 sqmm/m
Short Span Negative Moment At Continuous Support -
Moment Coefficient = N.A.
BM = N.A. kNm
Mu = 1.5 X BM = N.A. kNm
Area Of Reinforcement
= N.A. sqmm/m
Required (Mu)
Reinforcement Provided = N.A.
= N.A. sqmm/m
Long Span Positive Moment At Midspan -
Moment Coefficient = 0.056
BM = 3.286 kNm
Mu = 1.5 X BM = 4.930 kNm
Area Of Reinforcement
= 155.740 sqmm/m
Required (Mu)
Area Of Reinforcement
= 174.490 sqmm/m
Required (BM + Defl.)
Reinforcement Provided = T8 @ 255 C/C
= 197.000 sqmm/m
Long Span Negative Moment At Continuous Support -
Moment Coefficient = N.A.
BM = N.A. kNm
Mu = 1.5 X BM = N.A. kNm
Area Of Reinforcement
= N.A. sqmm/m
Required (Mu)
Reinforcement Provided = N.A.
= N.A. sqmm/m
Distribution Reinforcement @ 0.12% -
Area Of Reinforcement
= 102.000 sqmm/m
Required
Reinforcement Provided = T8 @ 255 C/C
= 197.000 sqmm/m
Shear Check :
Along Short Span
Shear Coefficient(Lx),
= 0.430
SF1
V = SF1 x TL x Lx = 7.822 kN
Vu = 1.5 X V = 11.732 kN
Shear Stress, Tv = 0.138 N/sqmm
Nominal Shear Stress, Tc = 0.390 N/sqmm
Modification Factor 'K' = 1.300
Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers
 K x Tc = 0.507
> 0.138 Slab Is Safe In Shear
Along Long Span
Shear Coefficient(Ly),
= 0.330
SF2
V = SF2 x TL x Lx = 5.996 kN
Vu = 1.5 X V = 8.994 kN
Shear Stress, Tv = 0.120 N/sqmm
Nominal Shear Stress, Tc = 0.360 N/sqmm
Modification Factor 'K' = 1.300
K x Tc = 0.469
> 0.120 Slab Is Safe In Shear
Deflection Check:
Basic Span To Depth
= 28
Ratio
Span Correction Factor = 1.000
Tensile Steel Factor = 1.387
Compression Steel Factor = 1.000
Flange Correction Factor = 1.000
Max Span To Depth Ratio = 28.00 x 1.00 x 1.39 x 1.00 x 1.00
= 38.848
Lx/d = 38.000
< 38.848 Slab Is Safe In Deflection

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

6.0 REFERENCES
1. IS: 456 – 2000 Plain and Reinforced Concrete (Code of practice)

2. IS 13920: 2016 Ductile design and detailing reinforced concrete structures subjected to
seismic forces.

3. IS: 800-2007 Code of Practice for general Construction in Steel.

4. IS: 875 (Part I to III & Code and Practice for Design Loads (Other than earthquake) for
Building and Structures like Dead, Imposed, Wind and other Loads
Part V)

5. IS :1786 Specification for High Strength DeformedSteel bars and wires for
concrete reinforcement

6. IS: 1893 – 2016 Criteria for Earthquake resistant deign of Structures

7. IS: 1904 Code and Practice for design and Construction of Foundations in Soils

8. IS: 1905 Code and Practice for structural use of unreinforced masonry

9. IS 2062 - 1999 Steel for general structure purposes – Specification

10. IS 2911 Code of practice for Design and Construction of Pile Foundation

11. IS: 2950 Code and Practice for Design and Construction of Raft Foundations

12. IS: 3370 Part I, Part II Code of practice for Concrete structures for the storage of liquids.

and Part IV

13. IS: 4326 – 2013 Earthquake resistant Design and construction of Buildings

14. IS 13920 - 2016 Code of practice for ductile detailing of RCC Structures.

15. IS : 16700 Criteria for structural safety of Tall Concrete Buildings

16. SP: 16 Design aids for Reinforced concrete Structure.

17. SP: 20 Hand book on masonry design and construction.

18. SP 23 Hand book on concrete mixtures.

19. SP 24 Hand book on Indian standard codes of practice for plain and

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers

 reinforced concrete

20. SP: 34 Handbook on Concrete Reinforcement and Detailing

NBC-2016 National Building Code of India – 2016

Design Basis Report Desire 2 Design Engineers