See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/289986734

Soft graphs

Article in General Mathematics Notes · January 2014

CITATIONS READS

23 824

2 authors, including:

Rajesh K Thumbakara
Mar Athanasius College (Autonomous) Kothamangalam
23 PUBLICATIONS 58 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Rajesh K Thumbakara on 20 September 2022.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Gen. Math. Notes, Vol. 21, No. 2, April 2014, pp. 75-86
ISSN 2219-7184; Copyright © ICSRS Publication, 2014
www.i-csrs.org
Available free online at http://www.geman.in

Soft Graphs
Rajesh K. Thumbakara1 and Bobin George2
1
Dept. of Mathematics, M.A College, Kothamangalam
E-mail: [email protected]
2
Dept. of Mathematics, Pavanatma College, Murickassery
E-mail: [email protected]

(Received: 9-12-13 / Accepted: 14-2-14)

Abstract

Soft set theory, introduced by Molodtsov has been considered as an effective

mathematical tool for modeling uncertainties. In this paper we introduce the
notion of soft graph and investigate some of their properties.

Keywords: Soft sets, Soft graph, Soft graph homomorphism, Soft tree, Soft
complete graph.

1 Introduction
Soft set theory [7] was introduced by Molodtsov in 1999 as a general
mathematical tool for dealing with uncertainties. In soft set theory, the problem of
setting the membership function does not arise, which make the theory easily
applied to many different fields. The operations of soft sets are defined by Maji et
al. [6]. At present, work on soft set theory is progressing rapidly. The algebraic
structure of soft set Theory has also being studied in more detail [1], [3], [5], [8].
In this paper we introduce the notion of soft graphs, we also define soft graph
homomorphism, soft tree, soft complete graph and investigate some of their
properties.
76 Rajesh K. Thumbakara et al.

2 Preliminaries
For notation definition and facts from Graph theory we refer to [2], [4], [9] and
that of Soft set theory to [6], [7].

2.1 Graphs
A graph G = (V , E ) consists of a non-empty set of objects V, called vertices and a
set E of two element subset of V called edges. Two vertices x and y are adjacent if
{x, y} ∈ E . A graph G = (V ′, E ′) is said to be a subgraph of G = (V , E ) if V ′ ⊆ V
and E ′ ⊆ E . For any subset S of the vertex set of the graph G, the induced
subgraph S%is the subgraph of G whose vertex set is S and two vertices are
adjacent in S if and only if they are adjacent in G. A graph is complete if every
vertex is connected to every other vertex and we denote the complete graph on n
vertices by K n . A tree is a connected acyclic graph; where by a cycle we mean a
closed path. The distance between two vertices u and v of a connected graph G
denoted by d (u , v) is the length of the shortest u-v path. The diameter of the graph
G is the maximum of vertex eccentricities, where the eccentricity of a vertex u,
e(u ) = max{d (u, v) v ∈ V } . A homomorphism from a graph G to a graph H is
defined as a mapping h : G → H such that ( x, y ) ∈ E (G ) ⇒ (h( x), h( y )) ∈ E ( H ) . A
hypergraph H is a pair H = (V , E ) where V is a set of elements called vertices and
E is a set of non-empty subsets of V called edges or hyperedges, E is a subset of
P (V ) − {∅} where P (V ) the power set of V.

2.2 Soft Sets

Definition 2.2.1 Let U be a nonempty finite set of objects called Universe and let
E be a nonempty set called parameters. An ordered pair ( F , E ) is said to be a
Soft set over U, where F is a mapping from E into the set of all subsets of the set
U. That is F : E → P (U ) . The set of all Soft sets over U is denoted by S(U).

Definition 2.2.2 Let ( F , A) and (G , B ) be two soft sets over the common universe
U. We say that ( F , A) is a soft subset of (G , B ) if (1) A ⊆ B ,
(2) For all e ∈ A , F (e) ⊆ G (e) .

Definition 2.2.3 Let ( F , A) and (G , B ) be two soft sets over the common universe
U. The union of two soft sets ( F , A) and (G , B ) is the soft set ( H , C ) where
C = A ∪ B and H is defined as follows:
Soft Graphs 77

 F (e), for e ∈ A − B

H (e) =  G (e), for e ∈ B − A
 F (e) ∪ G (e), for e ∈ A ∩ B


Definition 2.2.4 Let ( F , A) and (G , B ) be two soft sets over the common universe
U such that A ∩ B = ∅ . The intersection ( F , A) and (G , B ) is the soft set
( H , C ) where C = A ∩ B and H (e) = F (e) ∩ G (e) for all e ∈ C

Definition 2.2.5 Let ( F , A) and (G , B ) be two soft sets over the common universe
U. Then ( F , A) and (G , B ) denoted by ( F , A) ∧ (G , B ) is defined by
( F , A) ∧ (G , B ) = ( H , A × B ) where H ((α , β )) = F (α ) ∩ G ( β ) for all
(α , β ) ∈ A × B

3 Soft Graphs
Let G = (V , E ) be a simple graph, A any nonempty set. Let R an arbitrary relation
between elements of A and elements of V. That is R ⊆ A × V . A set valued
function F : A → P (V ) can be defined as F ( x) = { y ∈ V xRy} . The pair ( F , A) is a
soft set over V.

Definition 3.1 Let ( F , A) be a soft set over V. Then ( F , A) is said to be a Soft

graph of G if the subgraph induced by F ( x) in G, F%( x) is a connected subgraph
of G for all x ∈ A .

The set of all soft graph of G is denoted by SG(G).

Example 3.2 Consider the graph G = (V , E ) as shown in Fig.1. Let A = {v1 , v3 , v5 } .

Define the set valued function F by,

F ( x) = { y ∈ V xRy ⇔ x is adjacent to y in G} .

Then F (v1 ) = {v2 , v5 } , F (v3 ) = {v2 , v4 } , F (v5 ) = {v1 , v2 , v4 } .

Here subgraph induced by F ( x) in G, F%( x) is a connected subgraph of G, for all

x∈ A.

Hence ( F , A) ∈ SG (G ) .
78 Rajesh K. Thumbakara et al.

v1

v5 v2

v4 v3

Fig. 1

Example 3.3 Consider the graph G = (V , E ) as shown in Fig.2. Let A = {v1 , v5 } .

Define the set valued function F by, F ( x) = { y ∈ V xRy ⇔ d ( x, y ) ≤ 2} .
Then F (v1 ) = {v1 , v2 , v3 } , F (v5 ) = {v3 , v4 , v5 } .
Here F%( x) is a connected subgraph of G, for all x ∈ A . Hence ( F , A) ∈ SG (G ) .

v1 v2 v3 v4 v5

Fig. 2

Example 3.4 Consider the graph G = (V , E ) as shown in Fig.3. Let A = {v1} .

Define the set valued function F by F ( x) = { y ∈ V xRy ⇔ d ( x, y ) = 1} .
Then F (v ) = {v , v } . Here F%(v ) is not a connected subgraph of G.
1 2 4 1

Hence ( F , A) is not a soft graph.

v1 v2

v4 v3

Fig. 3

Remark 3.5 If ( F , A) is a soft graph of the simple graph G = (V , E ) then

H = (V , E ′) where E ′ = {F ( x) x ∈ A} is a hypergraph called induced hypergraph
of G.

Proposition 3.6 Every simple graph can be considered as a soft graph.

Proof: Let A be the set of all edges of the graph G. Define a set valued function
F : A → P (V ) by, F (e) = { y ∈ V eRy ⇔ y is an end vertex of the edge e} .
Soft Graphs 79

Then ( F , A) is a soft graph, as F%(e) is a connected subgraph of G for all e ∈ A .

Intersection of two soft graphs need not be a soft graph.

Example 3.7 Consider the graph G = (V , E ) as shown in Fig.3.

Let A = {v1} . Define the set valued function F by
F ( x) = { y ∈ V xRy ⇔ d ( x, y ) ≤ 1} .
Then F (v1 ) = {v1 , v2 , v4 } . Define the set valued function H by
H ( x) = { y ∈ V xRy ⇔ d ( x, y ) ≥ 1} .
Then H (v1 ) = {v2 , v3 , v4 } .
Now F (v1 ) ∩ H (v1 ) = {v2 , v4 } which does not induce a connected subgraph of G.

Proposition 3.8 Let ( F , A), ( H , B ) ∈ SG (G ) be such that A ∩ B ≠ ∅ and

F%(e) ∩ H%(e) is a connected subgraph of G, for all e ∈ A ∩ B . Then their
intersection ( F , A) ∩ ( H , B ) ∈ SG (G ) .

Proof: The intersection of two soft set ( F , A) and ( H , B ) is given by

( F , A) ∩ ( H , B ) = (U , C ) where C = A ∩ B ≠ ∅ and U (e) = F (e) ∩ H (e) ≠ ∅ for
all e ∈ C . Let x ∈ C = A ∩ B . Since by assumption U%( x) = F%( x) ∩ H%( x) is a
connected sub graph of G, (U , C ) = ( F , A) ∩ ( H , B ) ∈ SG (G ) .

Proposition 3.9 Let ( F , A), ( H , B ) ∈ SG (G ) . If A ∩ B = ∅ then their union

( F , A) ∪ ( H , B ) ∈ SG (G ) .

Proof: The union of two soft set ( F , A) and ( H , B ) is given by

( F , A) ∪ ( H , B ) = (U , C ) where C = A ∪ B and

 F (e), for e ∈ A − B

U (e) =  H (e), for e ∈ B − A
 F (e) ∪ H (e), for e ∈ A ∩ B


Since A ∩ B = ∅ , A-B=A, B-A=A, either e ∈ A or e ∈ B for all e ∈ A ∪ B .

 F (e), for e ∈ A
Hence U (e) = 
 H (e), for e ∈ B

Since ( F , A) ∈ SG (G ) , F%(e) is a connected subgraph of G for all e ∈ A .

Since ( H , B ) ∈ SG (G ) , H%(e) is a connected subgraph of G for all e ∈ B .
Thus U%(e) is a connected subgraph of G for all e ∈ C and hence (U , C ) ∈ SG (G ) .
That is ( F , A) ∪ ( H , B ) ∈ SG (G ) .
80 Rajesh K. Thumbakara et al.

If ( F , A), ( F , B ) ∈ SG (G ) be such that F ( x) ∩ F ( y ) ≠ ∅ for all x ∈ A, y ∈ B . Then

( F , A) ∧ ( F , B ) ∉ SG (G )

Example 3.10 Consider the graph G = (V , E ) as shown in Fig.4.

Let A = {v1} and B = {v5 } . Define the set valued function F by,
F ( x) = { y ∈ V xRy ⇔ d ( x, y ) ≤ 1} .

Then F (v1 ) = {v1 , v2 , v5 } , F (v5 ) = {v2 , v3 , v4 , v5 , v6 } .

Here F (v1 ) ∧ F (v5 ) = {v2 , v6 } ≠ ∅ but does not induce a connected subgraph of G.

Hence ( F , A) ∧ ( F , B ) ∉ SG (G ) .
v1

v6 v2

v5 v3

v4

Fig. 4

Proposition 3.11 Let ( F , A), ( H , B ) ∈ SG (G ) be such that F%( x) ∩ H%( y ) is a

connected subgraph of G for all x ∈ A, y ∈ B . Then ( F , A) ∧ ( H , B ) ∈ SG (G ) .

Proof:

We have ( F , A) ∧ ( H , B ) = (U , C ) where C = A × B and

U (( x, y )) = F ( x) ∩ H ( y ) ≠ ∅ for all ( x, y ) ∈ A × B .

By assumption we have F%( x) ∩ H%( y ) is a connected sub graph of G for all

x ∈ A, y ∈ B . Hence (U , C ) = ( F , A) ∧ ( H , B ) ∈ SG (G ) .

Definition 3.12 Let ( F , A) and ( H , K ) be a soft graph of G. Then ( H , K ) is a

soft subgraph of ( F , A) if

(1) K ⊆ A
(2) H%( x) is a connected subgraph of F%( x) for all x ∈ K
Soft Graphs 81

To illustrate the definition we consider the following example

Example 3.13 Consider the graph G = (V , E ) as shown in Fig.4.

Let A = {v2 , v3 , v4 , v5 } and K = {v3 , v4 } .

Define a set valued function F : A → P (V ) by F ( x) = { y ∈ V xRy ⇔ d ( x, y ) ≤ 1}

Then F (v2 ) = {v1 , v2 , v3 , v5 } , F (v3 ) = {v2 , v3 , v4 , v5 } , F (v4 ) = {v3 , v4 , v5 } ,
F (v5 ) = {v2 , v3 , v4 , v5 , v6 }

Define a set valued function H : K → P (V ) by H ( x) = { y ∈ V xRy ⇔ d ( x, y ) = 1}

Then, H (v3 ) = {v2 , v4 , v5 } , H (v4 ) = {v3 , v5 } .
Therefore ( F , A), ( H , K ) ∈ SG (G ) .
Here K ⊆ A and H%( x) is a subgraph of F%( x) for all x ∈ K .

Therefore ( H , K ) is a soft subgraph of ( F , A) .

Proposition 3.14 Let ( F , A), ( H , A) ∈ SG (G ) . Then ( F , A) is a soft subgraph of

( H , A) if and only if F ( x) ⊆ H ( x) for all x ∈ A .

Proof: Suppose ( F , A) is a soft subgraph of ( H , A) , then clearly F ( x) ⊆ H ( x) for

all x ∈ A .

Conversely let F ( x) ⊆ H ( x) for all x ∈ A .

Since ( F , A) ∈ SG (G ) , F%( x) is a connected subgraph of G for all x ∈ A .
Since ( H , A) ∈ SG (G ) , H%( x) is a connected subgraph of G for all x ∈ A .
Hence F%( x) is a connected subgraph of H%( x) for all x ∈ A . Also A ⊆ A .

Thus ( F , A) is a soft subgraph of ( H , A)

Corollary 3.15 Every soft graph is a soft graph of itself. That is if ( F , A) is a soft
graph of G then ( F , A) is a soft subgraph of itself.

Definition 3.16 Let ( F , A) be a soft graph of G1 and let f be a graph

homomorphism from G1 to G2 . Then ( f ( F ))( x) = f ( F ( x)) for all x ∈ A .

Proposition 3.17 Let ( F , A) and ( H , B ) be soft graphs of G1 such that ( F , A) is

a soft subgraph of ( H , B ) . If f is a graph homomorphism from G1 to G2 , then
( f ( F ), A) is a soft subgraph of ( f ( H ), B )
82 Rajesh K. Thumbakara et al.

Proof: Given ( F , A) is a soft subgraph of ( H , B ) , then A ⊆ B and F%( x) is a

subgraph of H%( x) for all x ∈ A .

Since f is a homomorphism from G1 to G2 and homomorphic image of a

connected subgraph in G is a connected subgraph in G we have f ( F%( x)) and
1 2

f ( H%( y )) are connected subgraphs of G2 for all x ∈ A and y ∈ B .

Also f ( F%( x)) is a subgraph of f ( H%( x)) for all x ∈ A .

Hence ( f ( F ), A) is a soft subgraph of ( f ( H ), B ) .

Definition 3.18 Let ( F , A) and ( H , B ) be soft graphs of the graphs G1 and G2

respectively. Let f : G1 → G2 and g : A → B . Then ( f , g ) is said to be a soft
graph homomorphism if ,

(1) f is a graph homomorphism from G1 to G2

(2) g is a mapping from A to B
(3) f ( F ( x)) = H ( g ( x)) for all x ∈ A

Then ( F , A) is said to be a soft graph homomorphic to ( H , B ) .

Definition 3.19 If f is a graph isomorphism from G1 to G2 and g is a bijection

from A to B . Then ( f , g ) is said to be a soft graph isomorphism and ( F , A) the
soft graph isomorphic to ( H , B ) .

Example 3.20 Consider the graphs G1 = (V1 , E1 ) and G2 = (V2 , E2 ) as shown in

Fig.5.
Let A = {v1 , v2 , v3 , v4 } and B = {u , v}
Define a set valued function F : V1 → P (V1 ) by F ( x) = { y ∈ V1 xRy ⇔ d ( x, y ) ≤ 1}
Then ( F , A) ∈ SG (G1 )
Define set valued function F : V2 → P (V2 ) by H ( x) = { y ∈ V2 xRy ⇔ d ( x, y ) ≤ 1}
Then ( H , B ) ∈ SG (G2 )
Define f : G1 → G2 by f (v1 ) = u , f (v2 ) = v , f (v3 ) = u , f (v4 ) = v .
Then f is a graph homomorphism from G1 and G2 .
Define g : A → B by g (v1 ) = u , g (v2 ) = v , g (v3 ) = u , g (v4 ) = v .
Then g is a mapping from A to B .
Also f ( F ( x)) = H ( g ( x)) for all x ∈ A
Hence ( F , A) is a soft graph homomorphic to ( H , B ) .
Soft Graphs 83

v1 v2 u

v4 v3 v

Fig. 5

4 Soft Trees
Definition 4.1 Let G = (V , E ) a graph and ( F , A) be a soft graph of G . Then
( F , A) is said to be a soft tree if F%( x) is a tree for all x ∈ A .

Example 4.2 Consider the graphs G = (V , E ) as shown in Fig.3.

Let A = {v2 , v4 }
Define a set valued function F : A → P (V ) by F ( x) = { y ∈ V xRy ⇔ d ( x, y ) ≤ 1}
Then F (v2 ) = {v1 , v2 , v3 } , F (v4 ) = {v1 , v3 , v4 }

Here F%( x) is a tree for all x ∈ A . Therefore ( F , A) is a soft tree.

Proposition 4.3 Let the graphs G = (V , E ) be a tree. Then every ( F , A) ∈ SG (G ) is

a soft tree.

Proof: Let ( F , A) ∈ SG (G ) . Then F%( x) is a connected subgraph of G for all

x∈ A.

Since G is a tree every connected subgraph of G is a tree. Therefore ( F , A) is a

soft tree.

Remark 4.4 The converse of above theorem is not true. That is if ( F , A) is a soft
tree of G then G need not be a tree.

For from example 4.2 ( F , A) is a soft tree but G is not a tree as it contains a cycle.

Theorem 4.5 A soft graph ( F , A) of G is a soft tree if and only if F%( x) is acyclic
for all x ∈ A .

Theorem 4.6 Let ( F , A) be a soft tree of the graph G1 then the following holds

(1) If ( H , B ) is a soft subgraph of ( F , A) then ( H , B ) is a soft tree of G1 .

84 Rajesh K. Thumbakara et al.

(2) If ( F , A) is a soft tree of G1 and if ( H , B ) the soft graph homomorphic

image of ( F , A) in the acyclic graph G2 . Then ( H , B ) is a soft tree of G2 .

Proof

(1) Given ( H , B ) is a soft subgraph of ( F , A) .

Then B ⊆ A and H%( x) is a connected subgraph of F%( x) for all x ∈ B .
Since ( F , A) is a soft tree, F%( x) is a tree for all x ∈ A .
Now since H%( x) is a connected subgraph of F%( x) , H%( x) is a tree for all
x∈B.
Therefore ( H , B ) is a soft tree of G1

(2) Given ( H , B ) the soft graph homomorphic image of ( F , A) .

Then there is a soft graph homomorphism ( f , g ) where f : G1 → G2 a
graph homomorphism and g : A → B such that f ( F ( x)) = H ( g ( x)) for all
x∈ A.
Since ( F , A) is a soft tree, F%( x) is a tree for all x ∈ A .
Since f is a homomorphism and G2 is acyclic, the induced subgraph of
f ( F ( x)) is also a tree for all x ∈ A .
That is H ( g ( x)) induces a tree for all x ∈ A .
Since g is onto, for all y ∈ B there exist x ∈ A such that g ( x) = y .
Hence H%( y ) is a tree for all y ∈ B .
Therefore ( H , B ) is a soft tree of G2

5 Soft Complete Graphs

Definition 5.1 Let G = (V , E ) a graph and ( F , A) be a soft graph of G . Then
( F , A) is said to be a soft complete graph if F%( x) is a complete graph for all
x∈ A.

Example 5.2 Consider the graphs G = (V , E ) as shown in Fig.4. Let A = {v2 , v4 }

Define the set valued function F : A → P (V ) by F ( x) = { y ∈ V xRy ⇔ d ( x, y ) = 1}
Then F (v1 ) = {v2 , v3 , v5 } , F (v3 ) = {v1 , v2 , v4 }

Here F%( x) is a complete graph for all x ∈ A . Therefore ( F , A) is a soft complete

graph.

Proposition 5.3 Let the graphs G = (V , E ) be a complete graph. Then every

( F , A) ∈ SG (G ) is a soft complete graph of G.
Soft Graphs 85

Proof: Let ( F , A) ∈ SG (G ) . Then F%( x) is a complete subgraph of G for all x ∈ A

as every induced subgraph of a complete graph is complete.

Therefore ( F , A) is a soft complete graph.

Remark 5.4 The converse of above theorem is not true. That is if ( F , A) is a soft
complete graph of G then G need not be a complete graph.

To illustrate above remark we consider the following example

Example 5.5 Consider the graphs G = (V , E ) as shown in Fig.4.

Let A = {v1 , v4 , v5 }
Define the set valued function F by F ( x) = { y ∈ V xRy ⇔ d ( x, y ) = 1}
Then F (v1 ) = {v2 } , F (v4 ) = {v3 , v5 , v6 } , F (v5 ) = {v3 , v4 , v6 }
Here F%( x) is a complete graph for all x ∈ A .

Therefore ( F , A) is a soft complete graph. But G is not a complete graph.

Theorem 5.6 A soft graph ( F , A) of G is a soft complete graph if and only if

F%( x) is complete for all x ∈ A .

Theorem 5.7 Let ( F , A) be a soft complete graph of the graph G1 then the
following holds

(1) If ( H , B ) is a soft subgraph of ( F , A) then ( H , B ) is a soft complete graph

of G1 .
(2) If ( F , A) is a soft complete graph of G1 and if ( H , B ) the soft graph
homomorphic image of ( F , A) in G2 . Then ( H , B ) is a soft complete
graph in G2 .

Proof:

(1) Given ( H , B ) is a soft subgraph of ( F , A) .

Then B ⊆ A and H%( x) is a connected subgraph of F%( x) for all x ∈ B .
Since ( F , A) is a soft complete graph, F%( x) is a complete graph for all
x∈ A.

Since H%( x) is a subgraph of F%( x) , we have H ( x) ⊆ F ( x) . Now as every

induced subgraph of a complete graph is complete, H%( x) is a complete
graph for all x ∈ B . Therefore ( H , B ) is a soft complete graph of G1 .
 86 Rajesh K. Thumbakara et al.

(2) Given ( H , B ) the soft graph homomorphic image of ( F , A) .

Then there is a soft graph homomorphism ( f , g ) where f : G1 → G2 a
graph homomorphism and g : A → B such that f ( F ( x)) = H ( g ( x)) for all
x∈ A.
Since ( F , A) is a soft complete graph, F%( x) is a complete graph for all
x∈ A.
Since f is a homomorphism, the induced subgraph of f ( F ( x)) is also a
complete graph for all x ∈ A .

That is H ( g ( x)) induce a complete graph for all x ∈ A .

Since g is onto, for all y ∈ B there exist x ∈ A such that g ( x) = y .
Hence H%( y ) is a complete graph for all y ∈ B .
Therefore ( H , B ) is a soft complete graph of G2 .

6 Conclusion
In this paper, we introduced soft graphs, soft subgraph, soft graph homomorphism,
soft tree and soft complete graph and studied some of their properties.

References
[1] H. Aktas and N. Cagman, Soft sets and soft groups, Inform. Sci.,
177(2007), 2726-2735.
[2] C. Berge, Hyper Graphs, Elsevier Science Publisher, The Netherlands,
(1989).
[3] F. Feng, Y.B. Jun and X. Zhao, Soft semirings, Comput. Math. Appl.,
56(2008), 2621-2628.
[4] F. Harary, Graph Theory, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.,
(1969).
[5] Y.B. Jun, Soft BCK/BCI-algebras, Comput. Math. Appl., 56(2008), 1408-
1413.
[6] P.K. Maji, R. Biswas and A.R. Roy, Soft set theory, Comput. Math. Appl.,
45(2003), 555-562.
[7] D. Molodtsov, Soft set theory-First results, Comput. Math. Appl.,
37(1999), 19-31.
[8] E.K.R. Nagarajan and G. Meenambigai, An application of soft sets to
lattices, Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics, 35(1) (2011), 75-87.
[9] P.J. Cameron, Graph Homomorphisms, Combinatorics Study Group
Notes, September (2006).

View publication stats