BM NOTES Uit - 4 and 5
BM NOTES Uit - 4 and 5
The computer performs the second step, the process. During this step, the computer solves the
boundary value problem and then presents the results to the user.
During the postprocess step, the user reviews the generated results and notes factors such as:
Displacement
Temperature
Time history
Stress
Strain
Natural frequency
Designers using finite element analysis should be aware of inherent errors that can be found in
this process, such as the simplification of geometry in the finite element method and use of basic
integration techniques; errors in computing stemming from numerical difficulties or the limited number of
digits available in computers; and common user mistakes, such as selecting the wrong type of element or
providing inconsistent units of measurement.
Intervertebral Disc:
Each vertebra in spine is separated and cushioned by an intervertebral disk, that keeps the bones from
rubbing along and discs are designed sort of a radial tyre. The outer ring, known as the annulus, has
crisscrossing bands. These bands attach between the bodies of every bone. Within the disc may be a gel-
filled center known as the nucleus, very like a tire tube. Discs operate like helical springs. The
crisscrossing of the annulus pull the bones along against the elastic resistance of the gel-filled nucleus.
Injury and strain will cause discs to bulge or herniate, a condition during which the nucleus is pushed out
through the annulus to compress the nerve roots inflicting back pain.
The working of spinal unit is contain 2 vertebras disc, two aspects of joint, and structures unified between
vertebras. It‟s one the necessary operating unit of spinal cord. To review and perceive the result of
disease, degeneration inflammation and totally different spinal biomechanic. Disc provides six degree of
freedom an motion is restricted by fibers within the ligaments.
FEA of Lumbar Spine:
Various techniques are available to study the behavior of the spine in healthy, diseased and
damaged spine and to evaluate the treatment procedure. There is a need for a standardized technique to
validate, verify and test these designs. There are many pathological conditions associated with spine.
Osteoporosis is a condition characterized by a decrease in the density of bone, decreasing its strength and
resulting in fragile bones. It leads to abnormally porous state that is compressible, like a sponge. It
weakens the bone and results in frequent fractures (breaks) in the bones. The fracture at hip and spine are
associated with significant amount of mortality and morbidity. Unfortunately, by the time x-rays can
detect osteoporosis, at least 30% of the bone has already been lost. Dual-energy xray absorptiometry
(DXA) is one of the bone densitometry techniques. It is used to measure bone mineral density (BMD) of
the bone accurately and it is considered as the „gold‟ standard for BMD measurement. Finite element
analysis (FEA) is used to study the stress-strain behaviour of any solid material. It allows new design to
be thoroughly 'tested' before a prototype is even manufactured. It would provide a wealth of information
in biomedical applications, which reduces our dependence on animal and cadaveric experiments and is an
invaluable complement to clinical studies. The FEA of the bone under various loading conditions is
helpful in the evaluation of the disease as well as in predicting future risk of fracture. A model of the
spine can be used to investigate the risk of fracture in the vertebrae and the progression of degeneration in
the inter-vertebral discs.
The 3D FEA model is generated wit facilitate of computed tomography for the Lumbar1(L1)
to Lumbar2(L2) lumbar cluster is taken into account mechanical properties designed for five vertebrae,
the four interverteral discs, the ligaments articular and capsular components. The whole modeling
supported a FEM that explains the structure is in anatomical or not on basis of mechanical properties
during this technique specification of load and pressure applied to it structure geometry of technique form
and versatile properties applied of the part The geometry is another time divided into tiny components and
therefore the differential equations regulate the deformation of solid are numerically solved.
ERGONOMICS - MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS:
Musculoskeletal disorders of the low back and upper extremities are an important and costly
national health problem. nearly 1 million people took time away from work to treat and recover from
work-related musculoskeletal pain or impairment of function in the low back or upper extremities. The
ability to better characterize the magnitude of the problem and formulate targeted prevention strategies
rests on improved surveillance and more rigorous data collection. There are a number of factors to be
considered: (1) physical, organizational, and social aspects of work and the workplace, (2) physical and
social aspects of life outside the workplace, including physical activities (e.g., household work, sports,
exercise programs), economic incentives, and cultural values, and (3) the physical and psychological
characteristics of the individual. In addition, physical activities away from the workplace may also cause
musculoskeletal syndromes. The complexity of the problem is further increased because all of these
factors interact and vary over time and from one situation to another. The panel approached the complex
of factors bearing on the risk of musculoskeletal injury in the work setting from a whole-person
perspective, that is, from a point of view that does not isolate disorders of the low back and upper
extremities from physical and psychosocial factors in the workplace, from the context of the overall
texture of the worker‟s life, including social support systems and physical and psychosocial stresses
outside the workplace, or from personal responses to pain and individual coping mechanisms.
As a result, Congress requested a study by the National Research Council and the Institute of
Medicine covering the scientific literature on the causation and prevention of these disorders. The
congressional request was presented in the form of seven questions, which are addressed in Appendix A
of this report. The funding for the study was provided by the National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health (NIOSH) and by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The charge to the panel from NIOSH
and NIH was to undertake a series of tasks that would lead to a detailed analysis of the complex set of
factors contributing to the occurrence in the workplace of musculoskeletal disorders of the low back and
upper extremities.
A conceptual model of the possible roles and influences that various factors may play in the
development of musculoskeletal disorders. The dotted box outline on the right indicates the possible
pathways and processes that could occur within the person, including the biomechanical load-tolerance
relationship and the factors that may mediate the load-tolerance relationship, such as individual factors
and adaptation. Outcomes may be a result of this relationship and may be influenced by individual
factors, such as conditioning or psychological state. The dotted box on the left indicates the possible
influences of the workplace on the sequence of events that can lead to musculoskeletal disorders in the
person. Arrows between “the workplace” factors and “the person” box indicate the various research
disciplines (epidemiology, biomechanics, physiology, etc.) that have attempted to explain the relationship.
For example, epidemiology typically searches for associations between external loading characteristics
and reported outcomes, whereas the relationship between external loads and biomechanical loading is
usually explored via biomechanical studies.
This framework is central to the panel‟s assessment, and it is used to orient and structure the
panel‟s report. The factors are organized into two broad categories: workplace factors and characteristics
of the person that may affect the development of musculoskeletal disorders.
Lower Back Disorders:
Low back disorder risk has been established through epidemiologic studies of work that involves
heavy lifting, frequent bending and twisting, and whole body vibration, as well as other risk factors. The
relative risks have been derived from a rigorous evaluation of the literature and have been found to be
strong and consistent. Strong points in this research include control for confounding, temporal
association, and characterization number of the studies are based on self-reports of injury.
Upper Extremity Disorders:
The pattern of evidence for upper extremity disorders, as for the low back, also supports an
important role for physical factors, particularly repetition, force, and vibration. The most dramatic
physical exposures occur in manufacturing, food processing, lumber, transportation, and other heavy
industries, and these industries have the highest rates of upper extremity disorders reported as work
related. Psychosocial factors were found to play a role in upper extremity disorders as well, particularly
high job stress and high job demands.
Based on a comprehensive review and analysis, Musculoskeletal disorders of the low back and
upper extremities are an important national health problem, resulting in approximately 1 million people
losing time from work each year. These disorders impose a substantial economic burden in compensation
costs, lost wages, and productivity. The identification of certain work-related risk factors for the
occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders of the low back and upper extremities.
The panel concludes that there is a clear relationship between back disorders and physical load;
that is, manual material handling, load moment, frequent bending and twisting, heavy physical work,
and whole-body vibration. For disorders of the upper extremities, repetition, force, and vibration are
particularly important work-related factors.
Work-related psychosocial factors recognized by the panel to be associated with low back
disorders include rapid work pace, monotonous work, low job satisfaction, low decision latitude, and
job stress. High job demands and high job stress are work-related psychosocial factors that are associated
with the occurrence of upper extremity disorders.
If transmission of vibration from the seat surface to the spine is considered, then the equation changes to
where aseat(f) is the acceleration at the seat and aspine(f) is the acceleration at the spine at frequency f.
So, a transmissibility of 2 would mean that there was twice as much vibration at the spine than at the
driving point.
Biomechanical Models For Human Response To Whole-Body Vibration:
For whole-body vibration, the most common types of models are lumped parameter and physical models.
Lumped-Parameter Models:
For whole-body vibration, the most common form of mathematical model in the literature is the lumped-
parameter model. This type of model is built from masses, springs, and dampers. The values of the mass,
stiffness, and damping are selected such that the response of the lumped-parameter model represents the
response of the person. It is important to note that it is not possible to map values of stiffness or damping
provided in lumped-parameter models onto any specific biological tissue in the human. The simplest form
of lumped-parameter model is a single degree-of-freedom system that is made from a single moving mass
supported on a single spring and damper. A single degree-of freedom system has a single peak in the
response. If there is no damping, then the peak occurs at:
Figure: Simple lumped parameter models consisting of masses, springs, and dampers. A: single
degree-of-freedom system; B: two degree-of-freedom system.
where fn is the natural frequency, k is the spring stiffness, and m is the moving mass of the system. If
there is damping in the system, then the resonance frequency occurs at a slightly lower frequency related
to the viscous damping ratio, ζ:
where c is the damping constant of the damper. The damped natural frequency,fd, is:
Physical Models:
A second type of the biomechanical response model of the seated person is a physical model, sometimes
known as a seat-test dummy or anthropodynamic dummy. Such devices can be physical representations of
lumped parameter models. The main challenges with anthropodynamic dummies are in the engineering
and practicalities of the design. In a moving vehicle there is vibration in all axes simultaneously, and a
single-axis dummy will not move like a human occupant. A final challenge with anthropodynamic
dummies is that of the health and safety of the test team. For it to be representative, the dummy must have
a mass similar to that of a person.
Therefore, it poses a manual handling problem, especially when installing or removing the device from a
space-limited cabin such as that of a car. Also, the dummy must be safe in all driving situations, including
emergency procedures. If the vehicle must suddenly stop to avoid a collision, the dummy must remain
securely tethered to the seat. Work is underway through the International Organization for
Standardization to specify dummy performance for application to mobile machines. It is possible that
dummies that meet the specification might also be appropriate for use in other forms of transport, but one
should remain cautious in using a device in an environment for which it is not intended.
Health Effects Of Whole-Body Vibration:
The most commonly reported health effect of whole-body vibration is back pain. Indeed, back pain is the
focus for the rest of this section. Despite this, other types of health effects have been observed. These
include sciatica, digestive disorders, genitourinary problems, and hearing damage. Portuguese researchers
have reported links between low frequency noise and whole-body vibration with a variety of disorders,
collectively termed vibroacoustic disease. These include thickening of cardiac structures and neurological
and vascular disorders. Despite the name of the condition, the greatest contributor to risk is considered
to be large-pressure-amplitude (≥90 dB SPL), low-frequency (≤500 Hz) noise.
HAND TRANSMITTED VIBRATIONS:
Hand-transmitted or hand-arm vibration occurs whenever an individual holds a vibrating tool. This could
be a powered surgical instrument, floor polisher, demolition pick, pavement breaker, riveting gun,
motorcycle handlebars, hair clipper, or a wide variety of other types of tools in a broad cross section of
industries. Hand-transmitted vibration is an industrial phenomenon.
The two terms hand-arm vibration and hand-transmitted vibration are synonymous. Hand-
transmitted vibration is the term which clearly indicates the source of the vibration.
Hand-Transmitted Vibration Perception:
The sense of touch is perceived through a combination of many sensory pathways. Sensory signals
through our hands are interpreted as texture, shape, temperature, location, size, movement, and, in some
situations, pain. For tactile perception in glabrous skin (i.e., hairless skin such as the palms of the hands),
receptors are embedded within the skin and are referred to by receptor ending, speed of action, or
psychophysical channel. Type I receptors are found close to the skin surface and therefore are able to
sense location of sensation more precisely than Type II . Type II receptors are found deeper in the dermis,
and therefore sensation is more general in terms of receptive field size.
Health Effects Of Hand-Transmitted Vibration:
Most of the interest with hand-transmitted vibration is due to the disorders that are often observed in
populations who use vibrating tools. Disorders can be broadly divided into vascular and nonvascular
categories. Nonvascular disorders can be further subdivided into bone and joint, neurological, muscular,
and other disorders. Collectively, both types of symptoms are referred to as hand-arm vibration syndrome
or HAVS.
Vascular Aspects Of Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome:
The most well-known clinical disorder caused by vibration exposure is vibration induced white finger or
VWF. Sometimes, this is known as “dead man‟s hand” or Raynaud‟s disease of occupational origin.
Primary Raynaud’s disease:
The name Raynaud‟s disease was used to conveniently label a variety of conditions with
unknown origin in which intermittent pallor occurred in the nose, ears, hands, and feet. Primary
Raynaud‟s disease is characterized by intermittent bilateral blanching of the
fingers. During recovery, the fingers often turn red, and this can be the most painful
component of an attack. Most sufferers are only affected in the hands, although some
report blanching of the toes, nose, ears, or lips.
Secondary Raynaud’s Disease:
Secondary Raynaud‟s disease is, by definition, one in which the symptoms have a known cause. The most
common cause is vibration exposure, although there are a variety of other possibilities These can be
broadly categorized into trauma, intoxication, obstructive arterial diseases, connective tissue diseases, and
a hypersensitivity in response to cold.
Figure: Cross Section Of The Skin Showing Tactile Receptors In The Dermis And Epidermis.