Project Scheduling
Project Scheduling
LIKELY COST/DAY
A Boarding, insurance, - 20 30 40 1,500
tax structuring
B Foundation, concrete A 20 65 80 3,500
footinfs for boxes
C Upgrading skyboxed, A 50 60 100 4,000
stadium seating
D Upgrading walkways, C 30 50 100 1,900
stairwells, elevators
E Interior wiring, lathes B 25 30 35 9,500
F Inspection approvals E 1 1 1 0
G Plumbing D,E 25 30 35 2,500
H Painting G 10 20 30 2,000
I Hardware/air H 20 25 60 2,000
conditioning/metal
workings
J Tile/carpeting/windows H 8 10 12 6,000
K Inspection J 1 1 1 0
L Final detail work/ I, K 20 25 60 4,500
cleanup
We should select the activity on the critical path ( A + C + D + G + H + I + L ) with the smallest crash cost/day which is activity A
($1,500/day).
- To finish the project in 250 days, the reduced cost for 10 Days for activity A would be $1,500 * 10 = $15,000
Project Variance = (total variances of activities on critical path) = 11.11 + 69.44 + 136.11 + 2.78 + 11.11 + 44.44 + 44.44= 319.43
days
Project Variance = (total variances of activities on critical path) = 11.11 + 69.44 + 136.11 + 2.78 + 11.11 + 44.44 + 44.44= 319.43
days
As per Normal Table in Appendix 1, for Z value of 0.56, the probability of 0.71226. There is a 71.23% chance that the project will
finish on 250 days.
To finish the project in 240 days, another 10 days need to be crashed, we can reduce activity D by 10 days for an additional
cost of $19,000 ($1,900 * 10).
As per Normal Table in Appendix 1, for Z value of 0.56, the probability of 0.86864. There is a 86.86% chance that the project will
finish on 250 days.
Of course, we know that the activities on the critical path should be crashed in order to meet the shorter project completion time.
We crash the cheapest activity first, then the second cheapest, until the desired time saving is reached. Thus, activity A is crashed first.
Since the desired project completion time is 250 weeks instead of the normal 260 weeks, 10 weeks need to be reduced.