1

TECHNICAL REPORT ON Ensemble Methods

Name –Soumya Ghosh

Stream – Information Technology
University Roll No. – 14200221011
Year – 4th
Semester – 7th
Subject – Machine Learning
Subject Code – PEC-IT701D

Department of Information Technology

 2

Contents
SL. NO. TOPICS Page Number
1. Abstract 3
2. Introduction 4
3. Ensemble Learning Methods(Bagging) 5

4. Boosting 6
5. Stacking 7
6. Applications of Ensemble Methods 8
7. Conclusion 9
8. Acknowledgement 10
9. References 11

Department of Information Technology

3

Abstract
Ensemble methods are a powerful class of machine learning techniques designed to
improve the predictive performance of models by combining multiple learners. The key idea
behind ensemble learning is that the collective decisions of a group of models, often called
base learners or weak learners, can produce better results than any individual model. This
approach helps reduce variance, bias, or improve predictions, depending on how the
models are combined.
There are three primary categories of ensemble techniques: bagging, boosting, and
stacking. Bagging (Bootstrap Aggregating) involves training multiple models on different
subsets of data and averaging their predictions, thereby reducing variance. Random forests,
an extension of decision trees, is a widely used bagging method. Boosting, on the other
hand, builds models sequentially, where each new model attempts to correct the errors
made by the previous ones. Popular boosting algorithms include AdaBoost, Gradient
Boosting, and XGBoost. Stacking combines predictions from several models (often using
different algorithms) by training a meta-model to make final predictions based on the
outputs of the base models.
The advantages of ensemble methods are particularly evident in complex tasks such as
classification, regression, and even anomaly detection, where individual models may
struggle to capture all patterns. Ensemble models tend to generalize better to unseen data,
making them effective in handling overfitting. However, their complexity can lead to
increased computational cost and difficulty in interpretation, which can pose challenges in
certain real-world applications.
This report provides an in-depth exploration of these ensemble techniques, their theoretical
underpinnings, and practical use cases. We also examine recent advancements in the field
and discuss best practices for deploying ensemble methods to achieve superior model
performance across various domains.

Department of Information Technology

4

Introduction
In machine learning, ensemble methods combine multiple models to improve the
performance, accuracy, and robustness of predictions. The basic principle behind ensemble
learning is that a group of weak learners can form a strong learner when combined.
Ensemble methods have gained significant popularity in recent years because they often
outperform individual models. These techniques are particularly effective when models
have high variance, high bias, or when the data is too complex for a single model to
generalize effectively.
This report explores key ensemble methods, including Bagging, Boosting, Stacking,
and Random Forest, their applications, advantages, and challenges.

Department of Information Technology

5

2.Ensemble Learning Methods

2.1 Bagging (Bootstrap Aggregating)
Bagging is a technique aimed at reducing the variance of a model by generating
additional data through random sampling with replacement. Multiple versions of a
predictor are trained on different subsets of the data, and the final prediction is typically
made by averaging the predictions for regression tasks or by majority voting for
classification tasks.
 Key Features:
o Increases stability and accuracy.
o Reduces variance, preventing overfitting.
o Can be used with high-variance models like decision trees.
Example: Random Forest
Random Forest is a popular variant of Bagging that combines several decision trees. It
splits the data into subsets, trains individual trees, and aggregates their predictions. This
helps improve generalization and robustness.
 Advantages:
o High accuracy.
o Resistant to overfitting due to averaging.
o Can handle large datasets with high-dimensional features.
 Challenges:
o Computationally expensive when dealing with large datasets.
o Limited interpretability compared to simpler models.

Department of Information Technology

6

2.2 Boosting
Boosting is a sequential technique that builds models iteratively, where each new
model attempts to correct the errors of the previous one. Unlike Bagging, which focuses on
variance reduction, Boosting aims to reduce both bias and variance. In each step, the
algorithm assigns higher weights to the instances that were previously misclassified, forcing
the model to focus on the difficult cases.
Types of Boosting:
 AdaBoost (Adaptive Boosting): Works by adjusting the weights of weak learners based
on their accuracy. Each subsequent learner focuses more on difficult instances.
 Gradient Boosting: A more flexible approach, Gradient Boosting minimizes a loss
function by adding models that correct the residual errors of previous models.
 Advantages:
o Reduces both bias and variance, improving generalization.
o Effective for a wide variety of loss functions.
 Challenges:
o Sensitive to noisy data and outliers.
o Can overfit if the model is too complex or not regularized properly.
o Computationally expensive due to sequential training.

Department of Information Technology

7

2.3 Stacking
Stacking is an ensemble method that combines multiple models (also known as base
learners) by training a meta-model that learns how to best aggregate the predictions of the
base learners. The key idea is to use the outputs of several models as input features for
another model, often a simpler one such as linear regression.
 Advantages:
o Can achieve better generalization than individual models.
o Works well with a diverse set of models, capturing various aspects of the data.
 Challenges:
o More complex to implement and tune.
o Requires careful validation to prevent overfitting.

Department of Information Technology

8

Applications of Ensemble Methods

Finance
Ensemble methods, particularly Random Forest and Gradient Boosting, are used extensively
in fraud detection, stock price prediction, and credit scoring. The ability to combine weak
learners provides better predictions in noisy and complex datasets typical in financial
environments.
Healthcare
In healthcare, ensemble methods are used for disease prediction, diagnosis, and risk
assessment. For example, Boosting has been applied to predict patient outcomes based on
clinical data, significantly improving accuracy compared to individual models.
Natural Language Processing (NLP)
Ensemble methods, especially Stacking, have been used to combine various models in NLP
tasks such as text classification and sentiment analysis. The combination of diverse models
like logistic regression, SVM, and neural networks helps capture different linguistic features,
improving performance.

Department of Information Technology

9

Conclusion
Ensemble methods represent a powerful approach to improving the performance of
machine learning models by combining the strengths of multiple learners. Techniques like
Bagging, Boosting, and Stacking have become essential tools in machine learning, providing
increased accuracy and robustness in various domains, from finance to healthcare.
However, they come with challenges such as increased computational requirements and
reduced interpretability, which must be carefully managed in practical applications.
By leveraging the strengths of diverse models, ensemble methods continue to push the
boundaries of what is possible in predictive modeling, enabling more accurate and reliable
outcomes in increasingly complex problem spaces.

Department of Information Technology

10

Acknowledgement
I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to my professor, Nivedita Neogi, for her
continuous guidance and support throughout the preparation of this report. Her insightful
feedback and encouragement have been invaluable.
My sincere thanks also go to my peers and colleagues who contributed to the
discussions and provided perspectives that enriched the content of this report. Lastly, I
would like to acknowledge the resources and facilities provided by Meghnad Saha Institute
of Technology, which made the research and compilation of this report possible.

References
Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2), 123–140.

Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an

application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1), 119–139.

Ho, T. K. (1995). Random decision forests. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on

Document Analysis and Recognition, 278–282.

Department of Information Technology