HW 3 Sol
HW 3 Sol
x ’ = 5 x + 10 y
y’=−x−y
0
y
−1
−2
−3
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
x
x’=−3x+2y
y’=x−2y
0
y
−1
−2
−3
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
x
The origin is a stable node. The arrows indicate the two eigenvectors.
0
y
−1
−2
−3
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
x
The origin is a saddle point. The arrows indicate the two eigenvectors.
0
y
−1
−2
−3
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
x
3 3
2 2
1 1
0 0
y
−1 −1
−2 −2
−3 −3
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
x x
4
y y
x x
20
15
10
0
x
−5
−10
−15
−20
−25
−25 −20 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 20 25
In the above picture two curves are drawn: y 3 −y = 3x and y 3 = 3x. You can only see one
curve (the dashed one) there because they are barely distinguishable. You can use either
one as an approximation of the real curve. These two curves are good because as t → −∞,
most trajectories will lie between them and they’re very close. To prove the trajectories are
below the first curve, one can use the fact that it is a nullcline. To prove they are above
the second curve, one can look at the derivative of y 3 − 3x.
The fixed points of the system are (x∗ , y ∗ ) = (0, 0), (0, 2) and ( 32 , 0). We compute the
Jacobian: ! !
∂ ẋ ∂ ẋ
∂x ∂y 3 − 4x − 2y −2x
A= ∂ ẏ ∂ ẏ = .
∂x ∂y −y 2 − x − 2y
!
3 0
Next we evaluate A at the fixed points. At (0, 0), we find A = , so (0, 0) is unstable
0 2
! !
−1 0 −3 3
node. At (0, 2), A = , so (0, 2) is a stable node. At ( 32 , 0), A = ,
−2 −2 0 21
so ( 32 , 0) is a saddle point. The basin of attraction is x > 0, y ≥ 0.
x ’ = x (3 − 2 x − 2 y)
y ’ = y (2 − x − y)
3.5
2.5
2
y
1.5
0.5
ẋ = y
ẏ = x3 − x
where y represents the particle’s velocity. Equilibrium points occur where (ẋ, ẏ) = (0, 0).
Hence the equilibria are (x∗ , y ∗ ) = (0, 0) and (±1, 0). To classify fixed points we compute
the Jacobian: !
0 1
A= .
3x2 − 1 0
At (0, 0), we have τ = 0, ∆ = 1, so the origin is a center. But when (x∗ , y ∗ ) = (±1, 0), we
find ∆ = −2; hence these equilibria are saddles.
b) Any antiderivative of x − x3 induces a conserved quantity, for example
1 2 1 4
V (x) = x − x
2 4
7
1 2 1 2 1 4
E(x) = y + x − x .
2 2 4
c) Since this system is conservative, the point we predicted to be a center by the linear
approximation should indeed be a center. The phase portrait looks as follows:
! !
∂ ẋ ∂ ẋ
∂x ∂y −ky −kx
A= ∂ ẏ ∂ ẏ = .
∂x ∂y ky kx − l
!
0 −kx̂
Next we evaluate A at the fixed points. At (x̂, 0), we find A = , so (x̂, 0) are
0 kx̂ − l
non-isolated fixed points.
b,d) The dashed lines indicate the nulliclines. As t → ∞, y(t) → 0 and x(t) → x∞ ∈
[0, kl ).
8
x’=−kxy k=1
y’=kxy−ly l=1
3.5
2.5
2
y
1.5
0.5
dy
c) Note that dx = ẋẏ = kxy−ly l
−kxy = −1 + kx . Separate the variables and integrate on both
sides, we have g(x, y) = y + x − kl log x as a conserved quantity for the system.
e) We can see from the phase portrait that an epidemic occurs when x0 > kl .
0
y
−1
−2
−3
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
x
2.5
1.5
0.5
−0.5
−2.5
−5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5
c) The Jacobian is
!
0 1 − 3y 2
A= .
−1 −2y
√ √
At (−1, ±1), we have τ = ∓2, ∆ = −2. The eigenvalues are λ1 = ∓1+ 3 and λ2 = ∓1− 3.
1 1
The corresponding eigenvectors are v1 = ± 1 − √3 , v2 = ± 1 + √3 .
2 2 2 2
d) Consider the unstable manifold of the saddle point (−1, −1). This manifold leaves
−1
the saddle point along the vector v = 1 + √3 . Hence part of the unstable manifold lies in
2 2
the region where ẋ < 0, ẏ > 0. A phase point along the manifold will move up and to the
left and eventually will cut the negative x-axis. Since the system is reversible under the
transformation t → −t, y → −y. By reversibility, there must be a twin trajectory with the
same endpoint on the negative x-axis from (1, 1) but with arrow reversed. Together the two
trajectories form a heteroclinic orbit.
e) Consider the unstable manifold of the saddle point (−1, 1). This manifold leaves the
1
saddle point along the vector v = 1 − √3 . Hence part of the unstable manifold lies in the
2 2 √
region where ẋ > 0, ẏ < 0 (Note that 12 − 23 > −2). A phase point along the manifold
will move down and to the right and eventually will cut the positive x-axis (the origin
is a centre). Since the system is reversible under the transformation t → −t, y → −y.
By reversibility, there must be a twin trajectory with the same endpoint on the positive
x-axis from (1, −1) but with arrow reversed. Together the two trajectories form another
heteroclinic orbit.
10
3
x’=y−y
2
y’=−x−y
0
y
−1
−2
−3
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
x