App1 Reviewer
App1 Reviewer
1. Introduction
Tips for writing a Reaction Paper
2. Body
1. Keep the first-hand knowledge of the article
on which you are making your response or 3. Conclusion
reaction paper. Contemplate the article, and
make a note of the areas of the article that 4. List of Citations and Source
amused you towards writing. Highlight the main
ideas and statements that you want to discuss.
Like an essay, a critique uses a formal, academic Typically, the introduction is short (less than
writing style and has a clear structure, that is, 10% of the word length) and you should:
an introduction, body and conclusion. However,
the body of a critique includes a summary of ➢ Name the work being reviewed as well as
the work and a detailed evaluation. The the date it was created and the name of the
purpose of an evaluation is to gauge the author/creator.
usefulness or impact of a work in a particular ➢ Describe the main argument or purpose of
field. the work.
WHY DO WE WRITE CRITIQUES? ➢ Explain the context in which the work was
Writing a critique on a work helps us to created. This could include the social or political
develop: context, the place of the work in a creative or
academic tradition, or the relationship between
A knowledge of the work’s subject area or the work and the creator’s life experience.
related works.
➢ Have a concluding sentence that signposts
An understanding of the work’s purpose, what your evaluation of the work will be. For
intended audience, development of argument, instance, it may indicate whether it is a positive,
structure of evidence or creative style. negative, or mixed evaluation.
3. CRITICAL EVALUATION
This section should give a systematic and 4. CONCLUSION
detailed assessment of the different elements
of the work, evaluating how well the creator This is usually a very brief paragraph, which
was able to achieve the purpose through these. includes: ➢ A statement indicating the overall
For example: you would assess the plot evaluation of the work ➢ A summary of the key
structure, characterization and setting of a reasons, identified during the critical evaluation,
novel; an assessment of a painting would look
why this evaluation was formed. ➢ In some
at composition, brush strokes, color and light; a
critique of a research project would look at circumstances, recommendations for
subject selection, design of the experiment, improvement on the work may be appropriate.
analysis of data and conclusions.
5. REFERENCE LIST
A critical evaluation does not simply highlight
Include all resources cited in your critique.
negative impressions. It should deconstruct the
work and identify both strengths and Check with your lecturer/tutor for which
weaknesses. It should examine the work and referencing style to use. Include all resources
evaluate its success, in light of its purpose. cited in your critique. Check with your
Consider the examples of key critical questions lecturer/tutor for which referencing style to
that could help your assessment include. use.
➢ What types of evidence or persuasion are • is the study, discussion, evaluation, and
used? Has evidence been interpreted fairly? interpretation of literature.
➢ How is the work structured? Does it favor a • is the evaluation of literary works. This
particular interpretation or point of view? Is it includes the classification by genre, analysis of
effective? structure, and judgement of value."
➢ Does the work enhance understanding of key • asks what literature is, what it does, and what
ideas or theories? Does the work engage (or fail it is worth."
to engage) with key concepts or other works in
its discipline?
• is the method used to interpret any given
work of literature. The different schools of
literary criticism provide us with lenses which
ultimately reveal important aspects of the
literary work.
DEFINITION
EXPLICATION
EXTENDED
Purpose or Need or Rationale- which outlines Contact Information- The fifth and final section
what others have written about the general provides the Contact Information of the
topic and focuses on the gap in knowledge to be applicant organization’s chief executive or
filled, the problem to be solved, or the need to his/her designee authorized to make funding
be addressed by the applicant’s proposed requests.
project. Similar to a literature review, this
section allows the applicant to state the
purpose or need in such a way that the
applicant’s project is the best possible solution
to the problem.