Website Vulnerability Scanner Report

 https://www.guffgpt.com

Summary

Overall risk level: Risk ratings: Scan information:

Low High: 0 Start time: Oct 29, 2023 / 04:53:44
Medium: 0 Finish time: Oct 29, 2023 / 04:54:05

Low: 6 Scan duration: 21 sec

Info: 13 Tests performed: 19/19

Scan status: Finished

Findings

 Missing security header: X-Content-Type-Options CONFIRMED

URL Evidence

https://www.guffgpt.com Response headers do not include the X-Content-Type-Options HTTP security header

 Details

Risk description:
The HTTP header X-Content-Type-Options is addressed to the Internet Explorer browser and prevents it from reinterpreting the
content of a web page (MIME-sniffing) and thus overriding the value of the Content-Type header). Lack of this header could lead to
attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting or phishing.

Recommendation:
We recommend setting the X-Content-Type-Options header such as X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff .

References:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/X-Content-Type-Options

Classification:
CWE : CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2013 : A5 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2017 : A6 - Security Misconfiguration

 Missing security header: Strict-Transport-Security CONFIRMED

URL Evidence

https://www.guffgpt.com Response headers do not include the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header

 Details

Risk description:
The HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header instructs the browser to initiate only secure (HTTPS) connections to the web server and
deny any unencrypted HTTP connection attempts. Lack of this header permits an attacker to force a victim user to initiate a clear-text
HTTP connection to the server, thus opening the possibility to eavesdrop on the network traffic and extract sensitive information (e.g.
session cookies).

Recommendation:
The Strict-Transport-Security HTTP header should be sent with each HTTPS response. The syntax is as follows:

1/5
 Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=<seconds>[; includeSubDomains]

The parameter max-age gives the time frame for requirement of HTTPS in seconds and should be chosen quite high, e.g. several
months. A value below 7776000 is considered as too low by this scanner check.
The flag includeSubDomains defines that the policy applies also for sub domains of the sender of the response.

Classification:
CWE : CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2013 : A5 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2017 : A6 - Security Misconfiguration

 Missing security header: Referrer-Policy CONFIRMED

URL Evidence

Response headers do not include the Referrer-Policy HTTP security header as well as the <meta> tag with
https://www.guffgpt.com
name 'referrer' is not present in the response.

 Details

Risk description:
The Referrer-Policy HTTP header controls how much referrer information the browser will send with each request originated from the
current web application.
For instance, if a user visits the web page "http://example.com/pricing/" and it clicks on a link from that page going to e.g.
"https://www.google.com", the browser will send to Google the full originating URL in the Referer header, assuming the Referrer-
Policy header is not set. The originating URL could be considered sensitive information and it could be used for user tracking.

Recommendation:
The Referrer-Policy header should be configured on the server side to avoid user tracking and inadvertent information leakage. The
value no-referrer of this header instructs the browser to omit the Referer header entirely.

References:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Referer_header:_privacy_and_security_concerns

Classification:
CWE : CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2013 : A5 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2017 : A6 - Security Misconfiguration

 Missing security header: X-Frame-Options CONFIRMED

URL Evidence

https://www.guffgpt.com Response headers do not include the HTTP X-Frame-Options security header

 Details

Risk description:
Because the X-Frame-Options header is not sent by the server, an attacker could embed this website into an iframe of a third party
website. By manipulating the display attributes of the iframe, the attacker could trick the user into performing mouse clicks in the
application, thus performing activities without user consent (ex: delete user, subscribe to newsletter, etc). This is called a Clickjacking
attack and it is described in detail here:
https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Clickjacking

Recommendation:
We recommend you to add the X-Frame-Options HTTP header with the values DENY or SAMEORIGIN to every page that you want to
be protected against Clickjacking attacks.

References:
https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Clickjacking_Defense_Cheat_Sheet.html

Classification:
CWE : CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2013 : A5 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2017 : A6 - Security Misconfiguration

2/5
 Missing security header: Content-Security-Policy CONFIRMED

URL Evidence

https://www.guffgpt.com Response headers do not include the HTTP Content-Security-Policy security header

 Details

Risk description:
The Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header activates a protection mechanism implemented in web browsers which prevents
exploitation of Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities (XSS). If the target application is vulnerable to XSS, lack of this header makes it
easily exploitable by attackers.

Recommendation:
Configure the Content-Security-Header to be sent with each HTTP response in order to apply the specific policies needed by the
application.

References:
https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Content_Security_Policy_Cheat_Sheet.html
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Content-Security-Policy

Classification:
CWE : CWE-693
OWASP Top 10 - 2013 : A5 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2017 : A6 - Security Misconfiguration

 Server software and technology found UNCONFIRMED 

Software / Version Category

LiteSpeed Web servers

Express Web frameworks, Web servers

Node.js Programming languages

Cloudflare CDN

cdnjs CDN

Google Font API Font scripts

Sectigo SSL/TLS certificate authorities

 Details

Risk description:
An attacker could use this information to mount specific attacks against the identified software type and version.

Recommendation:
We recommend you to eliminate the information which permits the identification of software platform, technology, server and
operating system: HTTP server headers, HTML meta information, etc.

References:
https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/stable/4-Web_Application_Security_Testing/01-
Information_Gathering/02-Fingerprint_Web_Server.html

Classification:
OWASP Top 10 - 2013 : A5 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2017 : A6 - Security Misconfiguration

 Security.txt file is missing CONFIRMED

3/5
 URL

Missing: https://www.guffgpt.com/.well-known/security.txt

 Details

Risk description:
We have detected that the server is missing the security.txt file. There is no particular risk in not creating a valid Security.txt file for
your server. However, this file is important because it offers a designated channel for reporting vulnerabilities and security issues.

Recommendation:
We recommend you to implement the security.txt file according to the standard, in order to allow researchers or users report any
security issues they find, improving the defensive mechanisms of your server.

References:
https://securitytxt.org/

Classification:
OWASP Top 10 - 2013 : A5 - Security Misconfiguration
OWASP Top 10 - 2017 : A6 - Security Misconfiguration

 Website is accessible.

 Nothing was found for vulnerabilities of server-side software.

 Nothing was found for client access policies.

 Nothing was found for robots.txt file.

 Nothing was found for use of untrusted certificates.

 Nothing was found for enabled HTTP debug methods.

 Nothing was found for secure communication.

 Nothing was found for directory listing.

 Nothing was found for domain too loose set for cookies.

 Nothing was found for HttpOnly flag of cookie.

 Nothing was found for Secure flag of cookie.

 Nothing was found for unsafe HTTP header Content Security Policy.

4/5
Scan coverage information

List of tests performed (19/19)

 Checking for website accessibility...
 Checking for missing HTTP header - X-Content-Type-Options...
 Checking for missing HTTP header - Strict-Transport-Security...
 Checking for missing HTTP header - Referrer...
 Checking for missing HTTP header - X-Frame-Options...
 Checking for missing HTTP header - Content Security Policy...
 Checking for website technologies...
 Checking for vulnerabilities of server-side software...
 Checking for client access policies...
 Checking for robots.txt file...
 Checking for absence of the security.txt file...
 Checking for use of untrusted certificates...
 Checking for enabled HTTP debug methods...
 Checking for secure communication...
 Checking for directory listing...
 Checking for domain too loose set for cookies...
 Checking for HttpOnly flag of cookie...
 Checking for Secure flag of cookie...
 Checking for unsafe HTTP header Content Security Policy...

Scan parameters
Target: https://www.guffgpt.com
Scan type: Light
Authentication: False

Scan stats
Unique Injection Points Detected: 1
URLs spidered: 2
Total number of HTTP requests: 10
Average time until a response was
220ms
received:

5/5