Digital Technology Implementation in Battery-Management Systems
Digital Technology Implementation in Battery-Management Systems
Review
Digital Technology Implementation in Battery-Management
Systems for Sustainable Energy Storage: Review, Challenges,
and Recommendations
Gopal Krishna 1 , Rajesh Singh 1,2 , Anita Gehlot 1,2 , Shaik Vaseem Akram 1 , Neeraj Priyadarshi 3
and Bhekisipho Twala 4, *
Abstract: Energy storage systems (ESS) are among the fastest-growing electrical power system due
to the changing worldwide geography for electrical distribution and use. Traditionally, methods
that are implemented to monitor, detect and optimize battery modules have limitations such as
difficulty in balancing charging speed and battery capacity usage. A battery-management system
overcomes these traditional challenges and enhances the performance of managing battery modules.
The integration of advancements and new technologies enables the provision of real-time monitoring
with an inclination towards Industry 4.0. In the previous literature, it has been identified that limited
studies have presented their reviews by combining the literature on different digital technologies
Citation: Krishna, G.; Singh, R.; for battery-management systems. With motivation from the above aspects, the study discussed here
Gehlot, A.; Akram, S.V.; Priyadarshi,
aims to provide a review of the significance of digital technologies like wireless sensor networks
N.; Twala, B. Digital Technology
(WSN), the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, edge computing,
Implementation in Battery-
blockchain, and digital twin and machine learning (ML) in the enhancement of battery-management
Management Systems for Sustainable
systems. Finally, this article suggests significant recommendations such as edge computing with AI
Energy Storage: Review, Challenges,
and Recommendations. Electronics
model-based devices, customized IoT-based devices, hybrid AI models and ML-based computing,
2022, 11, 2695. https://doi.org/ digital twins for battery modeling, and blockchain for real-time data sharing.
10.3390/electronics11172695
Keywords: energy storage systems; battery-management system; artificial intelligence; digital twin;
Academic Editors: Stefano Feraco,
blockchain; edge computing
Angelo Bonfitto and Nicola Amati
higher energy density and provide a higher power density for longer battery life in a more
compact package [4]. When compared to nickel-based batteries, their self-discharge is less
than half as great, and they do not require prolonged priming (priming is a conditioning
cycle used as a service to improve battery performance during usage or after long periods
of storage) [5]. Li-ion batteries are also becoming more affordable, which makes them an
attractive option for electric vehicles and other applications [6].
There are various traditional charging methods, such as constant current (CC), constant
voltage (CV), constant-current-constant-voltage (CCCV), and multi-stage constant current
(MCC) charging. CC charging is a charging method that uses a constant current to charge
the battery. The CV charging approach is environmentally friendly for fast charging; the
approach depends upon the battery’s technologies, but such charging harms the battery’s
capabilities. The CCCV charging method is a hybrid strategy that incorporates both
CC and CV [7]. The MCC charging technique consists of several phases with CC, and
the current progressively declines as the terminal voltage approaches a preset voltage
threshold. The battery is charged up to the point at which the conditions of the terminal
are met [8]. The dangers associated with conventional battery charging techniques include
overheating, overvoltage, deep discharge, overcurrent, pressure, and mechanical stress. A
supervisory system that makes sure batteries work properly in the intended application is
necessary to prevent battery failure and reduce potentially dangerous circumstances. A
battery-management system is the name of this monitoring device [9]. Nowadays, there
are many features available in BMS that help the battery operate more efficiently and
safely. Monitoring, battery protection, assessment of the state of health (SOH), state of
charge (SOC), mobile balancing, charging control, and thermal management are a few of
these functions.
A well-designed battery-management system is essential since there are issues about
the safety, dependability, and overall performance of lithium-ion battery systems, particu-
larly in stand-alone systems [10]. Currently, digital technologies such as WSN, IoT, cloud
computing, AI, ML, NN, deep learning, blockchain, big data, cyber security, etc., have
gained attention for real-time sensing, monitoring, fault detection, fault diagnosis, real-time
alert generation, and real-time analytics with prediction.
The cost of storing electricity is still high, and charging a battery fully takes a long
time. The cost of a battery also depends on the components that build up the battery.
Infrastructure for public charging is still lacking. A battery-management system has many
technologies applied to it, but there are still certain restrictions, such as cell balancing,
temperature control, charge control, environmental influence on the system, exact reading
of State of Health (SoH), State of Charge (SoC), and logbook functions, among others [11–21].
Studies have also conducted different systematic reviews of battery-management systems,
Electronics 2022, 11, 2695 3 of 24
such as the [22] study, which carried out an extensive literature review on state-of-health
estimating approaches, and [23] presented a comprehensive review of the most widely used
battery modeling and state estimation methodologies for battery-management systems.
Recently, a study [24] examined the evolutions and problems of cutting-edge battery
technologies and battery-management systems. Moreover, in data-driven electrothermal
models, data-driven technologies such as AI, cloud computing, and blockchain technologies
are examined. From this, it concluded that previous studies have focused on discussing the
review of individual technology implementation in battery-management systems.
With the motivation from the above aspects, this study discussed and reviewed the
progress and implementation of these technologies in battery-management systems, which
empowers an inclination towards industry 4.0. The novelty of this study is that in previous
studies it has been observed that the exploration of digital technology’s impact on battery-
management systems is discussed separately. Even though numerous approaches have
been offered, only a few kinds of literature have attempted a comprehensive assessment of
strategies for monitoring battery-management systems with multiple digital technologies
The authors of this work aim to present clearly and discuss the impact of digital technology
on battery-management systems by combining literature of digital technologies (WSN,
IoT, cloud computing, AI, ML, NN, deep learning, blockchain, big data, cyber security).
From the literature, we have concluded and discussed the vital recommendation that can
be applied as a part of the future research direction. The main contribution of the study is
as follows:
• The basic concept of battery-management systems with different technical terms and
architecture is discussed in detail.
• In order to analyze the impact of these technologies on battery-management systems,
we discussed various digital technologies such as WSN, IoT, Cloud Computing, AI, ML,
NN, deep learning, blockchain, big data, and cyber security for battery-management
systems using tabular and pictorial representation.
• Finally, from the analysis, the article discusses the limitations and presents vital
recommendations for future work.
The structure of the paper: Section 2 discusses an overview of battery-management
systems; Section 3 covers the technologies used in battery-management systems; Section 4
includes recommendations; Section 5 presents the conclusion.
• Reviews were not accepted for research that discussed methods but did not conduct
experiments or validate results.
• Diploma theses and dissertations in bachelor’s and master’s programs were not evaluated.
• Scientific articles that were non-peer-reviewed were not reviewed.
The authors have analyzed the articles that were considered for review. Based on
the analysis, this review presents the statistics of different papers that were utilized to
study the different technologies implemented for automated feedback systems. Figure 2
illustrates a pie chart that shows the percentage of the technologies used in this literature
survey. The major parts of the technology reviewed were WSN at 11%, IoT is at 13%, Cloud
Computing at 8%, AI/ML, NN and DL at 37%, Big Data at 4%, Blockchain at 7%, and
Expert System at 4%. Based on this conclusion, this study aims to discuss the progress and
significance of these technologies’ implementation in battery-management systems. This
study considers certain parameters to address the different technologies’ applications with
algorithms, techniques, and advantages.
system requires more programming coders and components (hardware), but it simplifies
troubleshooting and optimization for various network topologies.
Layer (HAL) are connected to the microcontroller. For real-time functionalities, a real-time
operating system (RTOS) is introduced into the BMS software architecture [12].
Figure 5. Implementation topology for a battery-management system. (A) Centralized (B) Distributed.
Our gadgets and technology are powered by electricity, which transforms chemical
energy into electric energy. Electricity can flow to a digital device through a battery’s
electrical circuit, which is formed by the anode and cathode. Batteries must be properly
disposed of once this electric circuit is exhausted, however, tens of thousands of batteries are
thrown away every year [31]. Even while disposing of batteries can seem innocuous, doing
so might have disastrous effects on the environment. Each battery includes dangerous,
lethal, and corrosive elements including lead, lithium, cadmium, and mercury. Here are five
facts regarding batteries you should be aware of if you are worried about their impact on the
environment. Battery-management system concerns related to efficiency, the environment,
and other operational characteristics are presented and summarized in Table 1.
prevailing study. Little research offers the dialogue of wi-fi sensor community technology
as much as LoRa technology and wi-fi information acquisition. However, this text gives a
complete dialogue of lots of wireless sensor communities with information and commu-
nication technology (ICT), along with IoT and battery-management systems [35–38]. The
article also depicts the notion of IoT implementation in a battery-management system using
a wireless sensor network. Finally, this essay discusses the benefits and ideas for improving
battery-management systems using an advanced methodology and advises building the
architecture in WSN using 5G technology.
There are two sorts of estimation methods: experimental and model-based estimation
approaches. In this work, thorough literature analysis and the methods for assessing the
health condition of the battery are presented in greater detail, and their respective merits
and weaknesses are evaluated [42].
The physical and digital embodiments of a battery interact closely in this cyber-
physical system, allowing for smarter control and longer battery life. The state-of-the-art
in-vehicle diagnostic tools, battery modeling, data-driven modeling methodologies, and
how these aspects might be merged into a framework for generating a battery digital twin
are all presented in these viewpoints [43]. Fiber optic sensors are being used more and
more in battery monitoring as a result of the growing demand for advanced battery control
structures with accurate reputation estimations. The purpose of this evaluation is to include
the advancements that have made it possible to use measurements of battery internal
parameters, along with the nearby pressure, strain, temperature, and refractive index for
renowned processes, as well as outside dimensions, along with the temperature gradient
and a gasoline sensor, to detect thermal runaway. Fiber optic sensors are characterized in
terms of battery structures of three different sizes including grid-scale battery structures,
battery packs for heavy-duty electric trucks, and electric cars [44].
The large current peaks during the data transmission method are one feature of the
LoRa technology. Thus, a hybrid energy storage device is implemented in preventing
the typical battery of a wireless sensor from degrading during rapid draining [35]. The
study discussed and detailed the abstract approach of employing a camera server network-
mode LoRa camera-powered energy-storage observation system [36]. The study discussed
offers a prediction approach for forecasting the subterranean management system’s battery
capacity evaluation. The technology guards against the improper operation and unexpected
battery failure [22]. With a 5G advanced battery-management system structure, the classic
BMS mostly uses comprehensive laboratory data to calibrate parameters, which makes it
challenging to satisfy the needs of extreme precision and real-time performance. The study
described the abstract design of the camera server network using a LoRa-based battery
energy-storage observation system. The trend for the future is a fact-based architecture of
personalized battery control systems, as seen in Figure 7.
Table 3 depicts earlier research that used IoT in a wireless sensor network. The prior
research included in the table was largely concerned with error detection, fault tolerance,
and increasing energy density. The integration of IoT and battery-management system is
used to obtain the most efficient and sustainable solution.
Techniques of ML will be ready in the future based on data received from cloud-
based battery-management systems for exact lifespan forecasting and system improve-
ments [48]. Table 4 provides the detailed function of cloud computing in wireless sensor
networks. The prior research included in the table contains the different types of sensors
with display systems, algorithms, and improved scheduling services for better battery
energy management.
nique may effectively fix corrupt data in the cloud battery database under temperature
changes [49]. A machine learning-based data cleaning technique is proposed that is rele-
vant to the properties of huge data from electric car batteries. The work presented a deep
learning-enabled lithium battery model that can adapt to a big data environment.
The data cleaning method, which is based on a machine-learning algorithm, produces
favorable results when a terminal voltage is absent, for example, when the mean absolute
percentage error of filling is less than 4%, which has a greater impact on improving the
overall quality of the dataset [50].
Information is gathered using big data technologies, which include N.N., machine
learning, and deep-learning algorithms. However, after going through the data cleaning
procedure, one can obtain the most accurate data, which is crucial for the battery’s lifespan.
Table 5 gives a thorough analysis of big data in battery-management systems.
The foundation layer concentrates on the system’s theoretical underpinnings and physical
foundations [23]. By thoroughly analyzing the extant literature on the status-of-health
estimating methods, the study discussed seeks to act as a valuable resource for scholars
and practitioners. There are two types of these techniques: methods of estimation based on
experiments and models [56].
One study implemented a battery life forecast model that is geared towards operational
battery management optimization. The methodology has been developed for lithium-ion
(Li-ion) cells to take into account five operational factors: discharging and charging currents,
maximum and minimum cycling constraints, and operating temperature [57]. The proposed
SoC and SoH calculations are utilized to build an algorithm that can accurately estimate the
battery state. The SoC may be appropriately computed by applying the battery efficiency
to the open circuit voltage to minimize the initial fault of the Coulomb counting method
(CCM). The internal resistance of a battery increases while charging and discharging, while
the CC charging time decreases [58].
This work calculates the SoC of Li-battery systems for any applications like EV using a
variety of ML techniques such as support vector machines (SVM), artificial neural networks
(ANN), linear regression (LR), ensemble bagging, and Gaussian process regression (GPR)
(Figure 9). The model’s error analysis is used to optimize the battery’s performance
parameters. Finally, performance indexes are used to compare all six algorithms [59].
Energy storage systems (ESSs) need a battery-management system algorithm that can
control the battery’s condition since getting older causes a battery’s internal resistance to
increase and its capacity to diminish. To manage the battery status, this research presents a
battery-efficiency calculation formula. The proposed formula for calculating the battery
efficiency takes into account charging current, charging time, and battery capacity [60].
The multipurpose control and planning (MCP) approach using three indices to define
the best BESS location and category: BESS capacity, OLTC and SVR tap operations, and
Electronics 2022, 11, 2695 14 of 24
PVP curtailment. In the simulated case study, BESSs were used for power smoothing
of the substation/PVPs and RPF prevention at the substation, simulating the needs of
Japanese power utilities [61]. The review begins with an introduction to machine learn-
ing’s conceptual framework and general application process, followed by a review of ML
progress in both enlightening battery material design and precise battery state estimation.
ML is thought to help accelerate the use and improvement of lithium-ion batteries on a big
scale [62].
The method for calculating the necessary parameters depends on the simulation of
the temperature from the battery measurements presented in the study discussed. A set of
rules first looks at the relationship between current steps and the terminal voltage that was
determined, using the assumption that a certain load is present in both the present and the
past. Second, by combining the Gauss-Newton approach and particle swarm optimization,
the first-predicted parameters from the primary methodology are appropriate for the
dimension data. Then, it is estimated how each simulation parameter depends on the
battery temperature and market reputation [63]. The five most extensively researched types
of device-learning techniques for estimating battery SOH are thoroughly examined. The
ML-assisted SOH estimation strategies are evaluated from three angles: the assessment
performance of several procedures using five performance indices, and training modes
based entirely on feature extraction and choice strategies [64].
In order to test lithium batteries, the educational data is divided using a special
evolutionary algorithm based entirely on the fuzzy C-approach clustering method. With
the help of the clustering findings, the antecedent parameters and the model’s topology
are found. The parameters are extracted using the recursive least-squares method, and
the antecedent and subsequent portions are then optimized simultaneously using the
backpropagation learning method. Studies have shown that the suggested estimator
is accurate and performs better than those produced using traditional fuzzy modeling
techniques [65]. Table 6 makes a distinction between different methodologies based on the
concept, kind, structure, and performance evaluation. Smart grids (SGs) and electric cars
are two examples of high-power applications that employ lithium-ion battery packs and
need a battery-management system.
Table 6. Cont.
domain-specific models, reflects the architecture as seen in Figure 10. The three basic layers
of the idea are hardware, twin, and service level [73].
Based on the digital twin, we can conclude the many solutions for battery-management
systems, such as real-time state estimation, digital modeling, dynamic charging control,
dynamic equalization control, dynamic thermal management, etc., [74]. For developing
the digital twin of a battery-management system, all the relevant data should be processed
and stored on a cloud platform. The stage of each battery cell can be shown by the digital
twin [75]. The studies in Table 8 address the study of digital twins in battery-management
systems using IoT and cloud technology, and by inserting the SOC and SOH into the system
for the digital twin, we can fit battery models to the data [76].
Display
Ref. Objective Sensor Used Algorithm Used Advantage
System
Standard procedure SOC, SOAP,
Hall Effect and Intelligent control of battery systems
[43] on the database - CC-CV charging
other sensors using the ML approaches.
Management algorithm
digital twin Multi-discipline The proposed design provides a
[73] Integrated Sensor -
architecture for BMS algorithm roadmap for the life cycle of a BMS.
Application of Least squares Summarizes recent methods of
[74] RFID, sensors Soh display
digital twin in BMS algorithm research for future enhancement.
Open-loop,
Measurement of Voltage, current, BMS was developed based on cloud
[75] Web front end model-based,
SoC, SoH. and temperature computing and IoT
AEHF.
Voltages, least-squares,
Inserting the SoC, Stored data shows the state of the
[76] temperature, and Web front end Levenberg–
and SoH in the cloud battery with advancements.
current Marquardt
involving the management of the battery, recovery, firmware security checks, patch gen-
eration, etc., [79]. Blockchain generation is used to defend an IoT-enabled battery control
gadget from undesirable cyberattacks and make certain verbal exchanges and statistics
security [80]. The studies in Table 9 address the sensors, algorithms, and advantages of
implementing blockchain for battery-management systems.
5. Recommendations
In the above, we have detailed and discussed the significance of battery-management
systems and the integration of digital technologies in battery-management systems for
achieving digital-based monitoring with advanced features. Based upon the analysis,
we have discussed the challenges and suggested further recommendations for future
enhancement below.
Electronics 2022, 11, 2695 19 of 24
• Wide adoption of customized IoT sensor-based devices in the monitoring and ob-
taining of real-time data of battery-management systems [4]. Customization allows
the user to include features that are very significant for their battery-management
system. In addition to this, researchers need to adopt the materials in developing
IoT devices for making them resistant to the environmental conditions of the battery-
management system.
• The large amount of sensor data that is generated through IoT sensor-based devices
can be effectively utilized for the prediction of charging and discharging time, SoC,
SoH, aging, etc., [72]. Researchers need to focus on creating a hybrid model that
can detect different anomalies under different environmental conditions with a high
accuracy rate. To achieve this, AI-based computing units should also be integrated
into IoT-based devices.
• Edge computing in battery-management systems is implemented limitedly. Edge
computing needs to be integrated into IoT-based devices for processing the obtained
sensor data at the edge network itself [43]. In addition to this, AI models can be loaded
into the computing unit to perform prediction analytics on real-time data. This indeed
can empower the enhancement of the latency and minimize the load on the server for
performing the prediction.
• The digital twin is an emerging technology, and the integration of this technology will
empower the creation of a replica of a battery-management system under different
environmental conditions with customized features [73]. Few studies have already
introduced state estimation and cloud-inspired equalization for batteries. Moreover,
this study also enabled upgrading of the route of the battery with full life-cycle data.
• Blockchain technology in battery-management systems enables the securing of data
and also connects different entities in the distributed network for real-time monitoring
of the health of the battery-management system from any location [74]. In addition to
this, blockchain enables the removal of the barrier of accessing and sharing data of
battery-management systems among manufacturers, electricity consumers, and power
grid operators.
• The evolution of big data with ML and DL has overcome the challenges of complicated
modeling and insufficient data-feature extraction, making the extraction and life
prediction of lithium battery health assessment features practicable [75]. Big data
examines the effects of important elements on the use of batteries: current, voltage,
and temperature. It focuses on the impact of charge-current fluctuations, high charge
cut-off voltage, and temperature on the stability of lithium batteries based on an
investigation of batteries of various materials.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, R.S. and G.K.; methodology, A.G.; formal analysis, S.V.A.;
data curation, S.V.A.; writing—original draft preparation, G.K.; writing—review and editing, N.P.
Electronics 2022, 11, 2695 20 of 24
and B.T.; visualization, R.S. and A.G.; funding acquisition, N.P. and B.T. All authors have read and
agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: The APC was funded by Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Data sharing not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
References
1. Owusu, P.A.; Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation.
Cogent Eng. 2016, 3, 1167990. [CrossRef]
2. Dai, H.; Jiang, B.; Hu, X.; Lin, X.; Wei, X.; Pecht, M. Advanced battery management strategies for a sustainable energy future:
Multilayer design concepts and research trends. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 138, 110480. [CrossRef]
3. Battery Management System Market Research Report: By Battery Type, Connectivity, Topology, Vertical—Global In-
dustry Analysis and Forecast to 2030—Global Industry Analysis and Demand Forecast to 2030. Available online:
https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5010717/battery-management-system-market-research-report?utm_source=
GNOM&utm_medium=PressRelease&utm_code=4cjcxw&utm_campaign=1549383+-+Global+Battery+Management+System+
Markets%2c+2020-2021+%26+Forecast+to+2030%3a+Automotive%2c+Consumer+Electronics%2c+Industrial%2c+Aerospace+
%26+Defense%2c+Telecommunications&utm_exec=chdo54prd (accessed on 28 July 2022).
4. Balasingam, B.; Ahmed, M.; Pattipati, K. Battery Management Systems—Challenges and Some Solutions. Energies 2020, 13, 2825.
[CrossRef]
5. Meng, J.; Luo, G.; Ricco, M.; Swierczynski, M.; Stroe, D.-I.; Teodorescu, R. Overview of Lithium-Ion Battery Modeling Methods
for State-of-Charge Estimation in Electrical Vehicles. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 659. [CrossRef]
6. Bilgin, B.; Magne, P.; Malysz, P.; Yang, Y.; Pantelic, V.; Preindl, M.; Korobkine, A.; Jiang, W.; Lawford, M.; Emadi, A. Making the
Case for Electrified Transportation. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2015, 1, 4–17. [CrossRef]
7. Chu, Z.; Feng, X.; Lu, L.; Li, J.; Han, X.; Ouyang, M. Non-destructive fast charging algorithm of lithium-ion batteries based on the
control-oriented electrochemical model. Appl. Energy 2017, 204, 1240–1250. [CrossRef]
8. Lin, Q.; Wang, J.; Xiong, R.; Shen, W.; He, H. Towards a smarter battery management system: A critical review on optimal
charging methods of lithium ion batteries. Energy 2019, 183, 220–234. [CrossRef]
9. Zheng, T. Fault diagnosis of overcharge and overdischarge of lithium ion batteries. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2018, 71, 1453–1458.
[CrossRef]
10. Banguero, E.; Correcher, A.; Pérez-Navarro, Á.; Morant, F.; Aristizabal, A. A Review on Battery Charging and Discharging Control
Strategies: Application to Renewable Energy Systems. Energies 2018, 11, 1021. [CrossRef]
11. Mehar, S.; Zeadally, S.; Rémy, G.; Senouci, S.M. Sustainable transportation management system for a fleet of electric vehicles.
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2015, 16, 1401–1414. [CrossRef]
12. Gabbar, H.; Othman, A.; Abdussami, M. Review of Battery Management Systems (BMS) Development and Industrial Standards.
Technologies 2021, 9, 28. [CrossRef]
13. Tarascon, J.-M. Key challenges in future Li-battery research. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2010, 368,
3227–3241. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Rigas, E.S.; Ramchurn, S.D.; Bassiliades, N. Managing Electric Vehicles in the Smart Grid Using Artificial Intelligence: A Survey.
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2014, 16, 1619–1635. [CrossRef]
15. Sancarlos, A.; Cameron, M.; Abel, A.; Cueto, E.; Duval, J.-L.; Chinesta, F. From ROM of Electrochemistry to AI-Based Battery
Digital and Hybrid Twin. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2020, 28, 979–1015. [CrossRef]
16. Li, W.; Demir, I.; Cao, D.; Jöst, D.; Ringbeck, F.; Junker, M.; Sauer, D.U. Data-driven systematic parameter identification of an
electrochemical model for lithium-ion batteries with artificial intelligence. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 44, 557–570. [CrossRef]
17. Korjani, S.; Facchini, A.; Mureddu, M.; Rubino, A.; Damiano, A. Battery management for energy communities—Economic
evaluation of an artificial intelligence-led system. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 314, 128017. [CrossRef]
18. Raju, P.; Vijayan, S. Artificial Intelligence based Battery Power Management for Solar PV And Wind Hybrid Power System. Int. J.
Eng. Res. Gen. Sci. 2013, 1, 2.
19. Lombardo, T.; Duquesnoy, M.; El-Bouysidy, H.; Årén, F.; Gallo-Bueno, A.; Jørgensen, P.B.; Bhowmik, A.; Demortière, A.; Ayerbe,
E.; Alcaide, F.; et al. Artificial Intelligence Applied to Battery Research: Hype or Reality? Chem. Rev. 2021, 122, 10899–10969.
[CrossRef]
20. Su, W.; Eichi, H.; Zeng, W.; Chow, M.Y. A survey on the electrification of transportation in a smart grid environment. IEEE Trans.
Ind. Inform. 2012, 8, 1–10. [CrossRef]
21. Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Chen, Z. A novel approach of battery pack state of health estimation using artificial intelligence
optimization algorithm. J. Power Source 2018, 376, 191–199. [CrossRef]
22. Xiong, R.; Li, L.; Tian, J. Towards a smarter battery management system: A critical review on battery state of health monitoring
methods. J. Power Source 2018, 405, 18–29. [CrossRef]
23. Wang, Y.; Tian, J.; Sun, Z.; Wang, L.; Xu, R.; Li, M.; Chen, Z. A comprehensive review of battery modeling and state estimation
approaches for advanced battery management systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 131, 110015. [CrossRef]
24. Liu, W.; Placke, T.; Chau, K. Overview of batteries and battery management for electric vehicles. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 4058–4084.
[CrossRef]
25. Abbas, M.; Cho, I.; Kim, J. Analysis of High-Power Charging Limitations of a Battery in a Hybrid Railway System. Electronics
2020, 9, 212. [CrossRef]
26. Arnieri, E.; Boccia, L.; Amoroso, F.; Amendola, G.; Cappuccino, G. Improved Efficiency Management Strategy for Battery-Based
Energy Storage Systems. Electronics 2019, 8, 1459. [CrossRef]
Electronics 2022, 11, 2695 22 of 24
27. Xing, Y.; Ma, E.W.M.; Tsui, K.L.; Pecht, M. Battery Management Systems in Electric and Hybrid Vehicles. Energies 2011, 4,
1840–1857. [CrossRef]
28. Lee, S.; Kim, J. Power Capability Analysis of Lithium Battery and Supercapacitor by Pulse Duration. Electronics 2019, 8, 1395.
[CrossRef]
29. Uno, M.; Ueno, T.; Yoshino, K. Cell Voltage Equalizer Using a Selective Voltage Multiplier with a Reduced Selection Switch Count
for Series-Connected Energy Storage Cells. Electronics 2019, 8, 1303. [CrossRef]
30. Kokkotis, P.I.; Psomopoulos, C.S.; Ioannidis, G.C.; Kaminaris, S.D. Environmental Aspects of Small Scale Energy Storage Systems.
In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Environmental Management, Engineering, Planning & Economics,
Mykonos, Greece, 14–18 June 2015; pp. 399–406.
31. Battery Recycling Is Important for Environmental Health—Gallegos Sanitation/Republic Services. Available online: https:
//gsiwaste.com/battery-recycling-is-important-for-environmental-health/ (accessed on 28 July 2022).
32. Liu, K.; Li, K.; Peng, Q.; Zhang, C. A brief review on key technologies in the battery management system of electric vehicles.
Front. Mech. Eng. 2018, 14, 47–64. [CrossRef]
33. Rahman, A.; Rahman, M.; Rashid, M. Wireless Battery Management System of Electric Transport. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.
2017, 260, 012029. [CrossRef]
34. Khattak, Y.H.; Mahmood, T.; Alam, K.; Sarwar, T.; Ullah, I.; Ullah, H. Smart Energy Management System for Utility Source and
Photovoltaic Power System Using FPGA and ZigBee. Am. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2014, 3, 86. [CrossRef]
35. Petrariu, A.I.; Lavric, A.; Coca, E.; Popa, V. Hybrid Power Management System for LoRa Communication Using Renewable
Energy. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 8, 8423–8436. [CrossRef]
36. Yudho, S. Conceptual design of battery energy storage monitoring system using LoRa. In Proceedings of the 2020 International
Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication: IT Challenges for Sustainability, Scalability, and
Security in the Age of Digital Disruption, iSemantic 2020, Semarang, Indonesia, 19–20 September 2020; pp. 374–377. [CrossRef]
37. Nurcahyanto, H.; Prihatno, A.T.; Jang, Y.M. Battery Management using LSTM for Manhole Underground System. In Proceedings
of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication, ICAIIC 2021, Jeju, Korea, 13–16
April 2021; pp. 500–503. [CrossRef]
38. IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IEEE Singapore Section. Industrial Electronics Chapter, IEEE Singapore Section, and Institute
of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. In Proceedings of the 2017 12th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications
(ICIEA), Siem Reap, Cambodia, 18–20 June 2017.
39. Vehicular Technology Society and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Vehicle Power
and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), Montreal, QC, Canada„ 19–22 October 2015.
40. Wei, Z.; Zhao, J.; He, H.; Ding, G.; Cui, H.; Liu, L. Future smart battery and management: Advanced sensing from external to
embedded multi-dimensional measurement. J. Power Source 2021, 489, 229462. [CrossRef]
41. Lin, X.; Kim, Y.; Mohan, S.; Siegel, J.B.; Stefanopoulou, A.G. Modeling and Estimation for Advanced Battery Management. Annu.
Rev. Control. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2019, 2, 393–426. [CrossRef]
42. Hu, X.; Xiong, R.; Egardt, B. Model-based dynamic power assessment of lithium-ion batteries considering different operating
conditions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2014, 10, 1948–1959. [CrossRef]
43. Wu, B.; Widanage, W.D.; Yang, S.; Liu, X. Battery digital twins: Perspectives on the fusion of models, data and artificial intelligence
for smart battery management systems. Energy AI 2020, 1, 100016. [CrossRef]
44. Su, Y.-D.; Preger, Y.; Burroughs, H.; Sun, C.; Ohodnicki, P. Fiber Optic Sensing Technologies for Battery Management Systems and
Energy Storage Applications. Sensors 2021, 21, 1397. [CrossRef]
45. Digi XBee and XBee-PRO Zigbee RF Modules | Digi International. Available online: https://www.digi.com/products/
embedded-systems/digi-xbee/rf-modules/2-4-ghz-rf-modules/xbee-zigbee#specifications (accessed on 28 July 2022).
46. Sampaio, H.V.; de Jesus, A.L.C.; Boing, R.d.N.; Westphall, C.B. Autonomic IoT Battery Management with Fog Computing. In
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics);
Springer: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 11484, p. 89103. [CrossRef]
47. Khayyam, H.; Abawajy, J.; Javadi, B.; Goscinski, A.; Stojcevski, A.; Bab-Hadiashar, A. Intelligent battery energy management and
control for vehicle-to-grid via cloud computing network. Appl. Energy 2013, 111, 971–981. [CrossRef]
48. Yang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, R.; Wang, M.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, B.; Ling, H.; et al. Implementation for a cloud
battery management system based on the CHAIN framework. Energy AI 2021, 5, 100088. [CrossRef]
49. Li, S.; Zhao, P. Big data driven vehicle battery management method: A novel cyber-physical system perspective. J. Energy Storage
2020, 33, 102064. [CrossRef]
50. Li, S.; Li, J.; He, H.; Wang, H. Lithium-ion battery modeling based on Big Data. Energy Procedia 2019, 159, 168–173. [CrossRef]
51. Barrett, D.H.; Haruna, A. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for targeted energy storage solutions. Curr. Opin. Electrochem.
2020, 21, 160–166. [CrossRef]
52. Shen, S.; Sadoughi, M.; Chen, X.; Hong, M.; Hu, C. A deep learning method for online capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries.
J. Energy Storage 2019, 25, 100817. [CrossRef]
53. Vellingiri, M.T.; Mehedi, I.M.; Palaniswamy, T. A Novel Deep Learning-Based State-of-Charge Estimation for Renewable Energy
Management System in Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Mathematics 2022, 10, 260. [CrossRef]
Electronics 2022, 11, 2695 23 of 24
54. Hossain Lipu, M.S.; Hannan, N.A.; Karim, T.F.; Hussain, A.; Saad, M.H.M.; Ayob, A.; Miah, M.S.; Mahlia, I. Intelligent algorithms
and control strategies for battery management system in electric vehicles: Progress, challenges and future outlook. J. Clean. Prod.
2021, 292, 44. [CrossRef]
55. Lencwe, M.J.; Chowdhury, S.P.D.; Olwal, T.O. Hybrid energy storage system topology approaches for use in transport vehicles: A
review. Energy Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1449–1477. [CrossRef]
56. Yao, L.; Xu, S.; Tang, A.; Zhou, F.; Hou, J.; Xiao, Y.; Fu, Z. A Review of Lithium-Ion Battery State of Health Estimation and
Prediction Methods. World Electr. Veh. J. 2021, 12, 113. [CrossRef]
57. Muenzel, V.; de Hoog, J.; Brazil, M.; Vishwanath, A.; Kalyanaraman, S. A Multi-Factor Battery Cycle Life Prediction Methodology
for Optimal Battery Management. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Sixth International Conference on Future Energy Systems,
Bangalore, India, 14–17 July 2015; pp. 57–66. [CrossRef]
58. Lee, J.; Kim, J.-M.; Yi, J.; Won, C.-Y. Battery Management System Algorithm for Energy Storage Systems Considering Battery
Efficiency. Electronics 2021, 10, 1859. [CrossRef]
59. Chandran, V.; Patil, C.; Karthick, A.; Ganeshaperumal, D.; Rahim, R.; Ghosh, A. State of Charge Estimation of Lithium-Ion Battery
for Electric Vehicles Using Machine Learning Algorithms. World Electr. Veh. J. 2021, 12, 38. [CrossRef]
60. Chiang, Y.H.; Sean, W.Y.; Ke, J.C. Online estimation of internal resistance and open-circuit voltage of lithium-ion batteries in
electric vehicles. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 3921–3932. [CrossRef]
61. Akagi, S.; Yoshizawa, S.; Ito, M.; Fujimoto, Y.; Miyazaki, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Tawa, K.; Hisada, T.; Yano, T. Multipurpose control and
planning method for battery energy storage systems in distribution network with photovoltaic plant. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy
Syst. 2019, 116, 105485. [CrossRef]
62. Mao, J.; Miao, J.; Lu, Y.; Tong, Z. Machine learning of materials design and state prediction for lithium ion batteries. Chin. J. Chem.
Eng. 2021, 37, 1–11. [CrossRef]
63. Dvorak, D.; Bauml, T.; Holzinger, A.; Popp, H. A Comprehensive Algorithm for Estimating Lithium-Ion Battery Parameters from
Measurements. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2017, 9, 771–779. [CrossRef]
64. Sui, X.; He, S.; Vilsen, S.B.; Meng, J.; Teodorescu, R.; Stroe, D.-I. A review of non-probabilistic machine learning-based state of
health estimation techniques for Lithium-ion battery. Appl. Energy 2021, 300, 117346. [CrossRef]
65. Hu, X.; Li, S.E.; Yang, Y. Advanced Machine Learning Approach for Lithium-Ion Battery State Estimation in Electric Vehicles.
IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2015, 2, 140–149. [CrossRef]
66. Lv, C.; Zhou, X.; Zhong, L.; Yan, C.; Srinivasan, M.; Seh, Z.W.; Liu, C.; Pan, H.; Li, S.; Wen, Y.; et al. Machine Learning: An
Advanced Platform for Materials Development and State Prediction in Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2021, 34, 2101474.
[CrossRef]
67. Qian, C.; Xu, B.; Chang, L.; Sun, B.; Feng, Q.; Yang, D.; Ren, Y.; Wang, Z. Convolutional neural network based capacity estimation
using random segments of the charging curves for lithium-ion batteries. Energy 2021, 227, 120333. [CrossRef]
68. Li, Y.; Li, K.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. Lithium-ion battery capacity estimation—A pruned convolutional neural network
approach assisted with transfer learning. Appl. Energy 2021, 285, 116410. [CrossRef]
69. How, D.N.T.; Hannan, M.A.; Lipu, M.S.H.; Sahari, K.S.M.; Ker, P.J.; Muttaqi, K.M. State-of-Charge Estimation of Li-Ion Battery in
Electric Vehicles: A Deep Neural Network Approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2020, 56, 5565–5574. [CrossRef]
70. Ardeshiri, R.R.; Balagopal, B.; Alsabbagh, A.; Ma, C.; Chow, M.-Y. Machine Learning Approaches in Battery Management Systems:
State of the Art: Remaining useful life and fault detection. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd IEEE International Conference on
Industrial Electronics for Sustainable Energy Systems (IESES), Cagliari, Italy, 1–3 September 2020.
71. Uzair, M.; Abbas, G.; Hosain, S. Characteristics of Battery Management Systems of Electric Vehicles with Consideration of the
Active and Passive Cell Balancing Process. World Electr. Veh. J. 2021, 12, 120. [CrossRef]
72. Merkle, L.; Segura, A.S.; Grummel, J.T.; Lienkamp, M. Architecture of a Digital Twin for Enabling Digital Services for Battery
Systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Cyber Physical Systems (ICPS), Taipei, Taiwan,
6–9 May 2019; pp. 155–160. [CrossRef]
73. Wang, W.; Wang, J.; Tian, J.; Lu, J.; Xiong, R. Application of Digital Twin in Smart Battery Management Systems. Chin. J. Mech. Eng.
2021, 34, 57. [CrossRef]
74. Li, W.; Rentemeister, M.; Badeda, J.; Jöst, D.; Schulte, D.; Sauer, D.U. Digital twin for battery systems: Cloud battery management
system with online state-of-charge and state-of-health estimation. J. Energy Storage 2020, 30, 101557. [CrossRef]
75. Merkle, L.; Pöthig, M.; Schmid, F. Estimate e-Golf Battery State Using Diagnostic Data and a Digital Twin. Batteries 2021, 7, 15.
[CrossRef]
76. Florea, B.C. Electric Vehicles Battery Management Network Using Blockchain IoT. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International
Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics (AQTR), Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 21–23 May 2020; pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
77. Bao, J.; He, D.; Luo, M.; Choo, K.-K.R. A Survey of Blockchain Applications in the Energy Sector. IEEE Syst. J. 2020, 15, 3370–3381.
[CrossRef]
78. IEEE Power Electronics Society, IEEE Power & Energy Society, IEEE Industry Applications Society, and Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC), Chicago, IL,
USA, 23–26 June 2020.
Electronics 2022, 11, 2695 24 of 24
79. Faika, T.; Kim, T.; Ochoa, J.; Khan, M.; Park, S.-W.; Leung, C.S. A Blockchain-Based Internet of Things (IoT) Network for
Security-Enhanced Wireless Battery Management Systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual,
Baltimore, MD, USA, 29 September–3 October 2019.
80. Trevizan, R.D.; Obert, J.; De Angelis, V.; Nguyen, T.A.; Rao, V.S.; Chalamala, B.R. Cyberphysical Security of Grid Battery Energy
Storage Systems. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 59675–59722. [CrossRef]
81. Kumbhar, S.; Faika, T.; Makwana, D.; Kim, T.; Lee, Y. Cybersecurity for Battery Management Systems in Cyber-Physical
Environments. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), Long Beach, CA,
USA, 13–15 June 2018; pp. 934–938. [CrossRef]
82. Kharlamova, N.; Hashemi, S.; Traholt, C. The Cyber Security of Battery Energy Storage Systems and Adoption of Data-driven
Methods. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering,
Laguna Hills, CA, USA, 9–13 December 2020; pp. 188–192. [CrossRef]