What Is Caching?: 1. Page Level Output Caching
What Is Caching?: 1. Page Level Output Caching
What is Caching?
Why Caching?
Consider a page that has list of Employee name, contact numbers and mail-Ids of
existing employees of a company on an intranet accessible by all employees. This is
very useful information that is available throughout the company and could also be
one of the most accessed pages. The functionality of adding, updating or deleting is
usually less intensive compared to more transaction-based systems like Purchase
ordering, Voucher creation etc. Now in a normal scenario the process of querying
database for each request is not cost-effective in terms of server resources, hence is
lot better to cache or persist the data to avoid this costly loss of resources.
This is at the page level and one of the easiest means for caching pages. This
requires one to specify Duration of cache and Attribute of caching.
The above syntax specifies that the page be cached for duration of 60 seconds and
the value "none" for VaryByParam* attribute makes sure that there is a single
cached page available for this duration specified.
* VaryByParam can take various "key" parameter names in query string. Also there
are other attributes like VaryByHeader, VaryByCustom etc. Please refer to MSDN for
more on this.
2. Fragment Caching
Even though this definition refers to caching portion/s of page, it is actually caching a
user control that can be used in a base web form page. In theory, if you have used
include files in the traditional ASP model then this caching model is like caching these
include files separately. In ASP.NET more often this is done through User Controls.
Initially even though one feels a bit misleading, this is a significant technique that
can be used especially when implementing "n" instances of the controls in various
*.aspx pages. We can use the same syntax that we declared for the page level
caching as shown above, but the power of fragment caching comes from the
attribute "VaryByControl". Using this attribute one can cache a user control based on
the properties exposed.
Add the following into an *.ascx file. Please note the use of tag "Control" and the
cache declaration.
Add the following to an *.aspx file. Please note the way "Register" tag is used; the
declaration of control using syntax <[TagPrefix]:[TagName]>; Usage of property "
DepartMentId". Open the page in two browsers and closely watch the Base form
timing and the User control timing. Also note that the following page results in two
copies or representation of user control in the cache.
With Page level Output caching one cannot cache objects between pages within an
application. Fragment caching is great in that sense but has limitations by using user
controls as means to do. We can use the Cache object programmatically to take
advantage of caching objects and share the same between pages. Further the
availability of different overloaded methods gives a greater flexibility for our Cache
policy like Timespan, Absolute expiration etc. But one of the biggest takes is the
CacheDependancy. This means that one can create a cache and associate with it a
dependency that is either another cache key or a file.
In almost all Web applications there could be numerous master tables that act as
lookups to application specific tables. For e.g. if you take up adding a Employee,
usually one has master tables like "tblQualification" to get list of qualifications,
"tblLocations" to get list of locations etc. These tables* are usually set during the
initial application configuration phase and could be modified once a month or even
less than that. Hence it makes sense for us to use them in our Cache rather than
making calls to database on each request. But then what Cache Policy do we adopt?
We cannot hold these objects in Cache for entire application instance, because if
anybody changes data in these tables one has to also refresh the cache. It is here
that CacheDependancy can be used.
* Even though these tables are less frequently used for updates, they are extensively
used in our select statements through out the applications.
Find below the snippet that uses CacheDependancy. Here what I have done is to
provide a list view of existing employees. You need to create a Database in Sql
Server, setup some data before you can continue. The schema scripts are enclosed in
the article.
Add database connection value in Web.Config and change the value as per your
setup.
<appSettings>
<add key="conn" value="Data Source=vishnu;trusted_connection=yes;Initial
Catalog=Users"/>
</appSettings>
First I get the dataset into which I fill the user list. But before this I check for the
cache initially if it exists I directly cast it to a dataset, if not create a cache again.
daUsers.Fill(dsUsers,"tblUsers");
I create the cache with "Users" as key using Cache.Insert* and link this with a file
"Master.xml". This "Master.xml" is a XML file that contains Master data of
"tblQualifications" and "tbllocations". I have used "Server.MapPath" to get the
physical path of the file on the server. The CacheDependancy instance will make sure
that any change in this dependency file means that you need to recreate your cache
key definition. This is a great feature to use since I can recreate my cache only when
required instead of caching the data at the page level.
Cache.Insert("Users",dsUsers,new
System.Web.Caching.CacheDependency(Server.MapPath("Master.xml")) ,
DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(45),TimeSpan.Zero);
Also note how we could use trace within to add my own statements.
HttpContext.Current.Trace.Write("from Database..");
We created the page that initiates and uses the Cache. For testing purpose we need
another page that will overwrite this "Master.xml" on click of a button for which the
code snippet is as follows. This ideally should be our master maintenance page that
adds/updates Master records in database and overwrites the XML. But to make it
easy I have just written an overwriting sample.
Now once you have created the above pages i.e. one that implements caching and
other that overwrites the dependency file, create two instance of browser and open
the cache implementation page and note for trace, label text; open the other
instance of browser with the page which overwrites the XML. Note the former, the
first time it fetches data from the database and the subsequent request will be from
cache till your expiration time of 45 seconds is reached or anyone overwrites or
changes the "Master.xml" file. Also give a look on Timespan parameter since you
have a concept of Sliding expiration that can also be implemented. Keep refreshing
the first page and you will see that trace indicates the cached page retrieval. Click
the overwrite XML button on the latter page that would overwrite the XML and again
refresh the former page to note that the data is retrieved from database. Though in
this example I have not shown any direct relation between the cached data and the
dependency file (like get values from dependency file and merge with cached object
etc) in terms of integrated usage, this could very easily be designed and
implemented. Dependency caching is a powerful technique that .NET supports and
should be utilized wherever applicable.
Conclusion