BK Mishra (Contd)
BK Mishra (Contd)
Teidgoolide
FIGURE 11.1 Problem box.
maze as a
experiment: Thorndike performed another experiment on rats using
a Maze for 24 hours and was brought to entry of the maze. Food
food
problem. The rat was deprived of which could be obtained by going through the maze
the maze the
was available in the goal box of box. It could be reached expeditiously by avoiding and
pathways from entry door to the goal food
the door, being hungry, it sensed the smell of the
blind alleys. When the rat
enters
beginning, the rat explored the maze after putting in
In the entered
began its exploratory behaviour. following almost each and every blind paths. It
the goal by eventually, the rat entered the
correct
Some efforts. It tried to reach exploratory activities,
and rentered. In course of
these
the food is reached, the trial ends. The procedure was
goal. When box without
path leading directly to the days until the maze is run from entrance to the goal experiment was
repeated regularly for several the blind alleys. The criterion of learningin this thought to be
into
error, i.e, without entering trial, i.e. the habit to follow only the correct path was continuously
maze
three consecutive errorless when rat was able to make errorless run into the
learning
the part of index of
outset of learning,
for three consecutive days. of Thorndike, one may assume that at the different for
From the two
experiments occurrence. However, the probability is has higher
initial probability of cat
each response has some cage problem, the squeezing response of the initial hierachy
responses. For example, in the string. Thus, there is
different response of the cat pulling
probability than the correct the effect of training trials is to increase selectively the probability reward
probabilities and response here is one which brings
Of response responses in the repertory. The correct acquired through trial and error and
of one of the of the organism which is
satisfying the drive
and by way of repeated practice.
Strengthened by
Thorndike, E.L. 1898, ibid.
Behavlour
Study of Human
Prychology: The characteristics of
284 fundamental Jearning process which
makes clear some
The theory
folows: process strongly.
Learning is a gradual holding the connection
()
Practice is important for important condition for learning behaviour to OCcur.
(ii) an
(drive state) isrewarding learnt
and therefore such responses are
(i) Motivation
a response is while tk
(iv) Success ofunsuccessful are unlearnt. error.
which are
involves the process of trial and
(v) Learning
Lo Gestalt psychologists have raised severe critical comments describing the theory far from
reality. According to the Gestaltists, the emphasis on practice in the theory is undue
because, practice alone is not important. Moreover, the theory is analytical in nature
yhereas what we learn is the pattern of the whole learning situation for which insight
ánd not the practice is important.
(i) Behaviourists have also criticized Thorndike's concept of law of effect. According to
them, the concepts of satisfaction and annoyance are subjective. Therefore, to explain
learning behaviour on the basis of subjective aspects would be misleading.
the effect
(iii) According to this theory, the repetition of a response is dependent upon ones are not
that it produces. Satisfying responses are repeated while annoying analogy is
repeated. Hence, learning of a response is effected backwardly. This response
not understandable to many learning theorists as how the consequence of the
consequence follows.
can influence the response which occurs first and its
(iv) The theory is mechanistic. It assumes that satisfying responses get fixated automatically
while the annoying responses drop out. Thus, it does not recognize the importance of
he failed to notice
insight or intelligence at all. Thorndike has himself accepted that the effect of reward
believes,
even a single activity being aroused on any rationale. He
However, Knafer (1968) found that
and punishment are mechanistic and autonomic. Hence, 'insight
for higher level conditioning, concentrations and awareness is a must.
instead of mechanical repetition is more important.
Thus. it is clear that Thorndike's theory suffers from several criticisms. However, the theory
theories of learning were
is important in the sense that building upon Thorndike's work, further learning.
propounded and thus, it paved the way tor progressive research in the area of
"HillL wE. (1977), Learning: ASurvey f Psychological Interpretations, 3rd ed., San Francisco Chandler.
A1.3
Behaviour
Psychology; The Study of Human
286 I n
ano
Kohler and
of
Koffka,
behaviourists on
pregnant
learning and advocated
facts
Insight
gathered in course of works done
(stimulus-stimulus)
on perceptual
association instead of
prleiarninciplnegs, oom.
Hoo
Human Behavlour
314 + Peychology: The Study of perma
Transfer effects are of two typespositive and negative. In positive transfer. thhe acquisitn a task
of one type of skill facilitates the acquisition of another. On the other hand, when the acquisitin recita
of earlier habit or skillterms, positive transfer is also referred to as because earlier while the etcT
.
to the nor
are interfering in nature
learn
facilitative
of any effect effects
acquisition on later task is neither
learning or effect shows absence of of
no
of earlier or no transfer effect. Thus, zero earlier
called zero effect
learning on new (later) learning. zero transfer effects are shown in Table 11.4. natu
be
of stimulus-stimulus (S-S)
From Table 11.5. it is evident that five distinct possibilities
stimulus-response (S-R) associations and the resultant transfer effects are possible. All such
or caused by certain specific factors that
transfer effects are specific because these eifects are
similarity in stimulus situation, response
operate in forning S-S or S-R associations such as
diferences. Due to operation of these factors, the
Similarity, stimulus differences or response specific factors is operative, no
transfer effect is either positive or negative and if none of these
ransfer effect (zero effect) occurs.
be attributed to some specific factor involved
Thus, specifc transfer effect is an effect that can
in learning tasks. studies, the following conclusions have been drawn
On the basis of several experimental
about specific transfer.
11.14.2 Bases of Transfer oo oo gnio
Ahe phenomenon of transfer occurs on account of the
following factors:9g o
Similarity of contentsbnsgab usl es obeik atl olls o ot Sr
Parts of old habits runoff as a response to
new situation more easily when the
two stimulus situations with some
minor modifications are the same. For contents of th.
learns about the national movement in his example, suppose, a punji
of national movement in the history class.
political science class. He again learns about the event
Since, the contents of the two class situations are he
same, what has been learnt through lectures in the
former is more amenable to be transferred to
another. Similarly, one learns the alphabets
QSTNHPLAR. Here, the learning of the second QQSTNIPJFA. In another session, he is given to leam
of the items are already learned in the series of alphabets will be easier because, most
former set. A person familiar with one card game finds it
easier to Jearn other games. Many similar examples may be cited.
Similarity of technique
Most tasks or problems involve similar techniques to be
a problem. Hence, techniques learned in one followed in performing or solving
situation are
example, one learns a scientific approach to the problem intransferred to another situation. For
one subject and applies the samte
scientific procedure in the other fields is an example of transfer of
takes a course in formal logic and thereafter thinks more technique. Likewise, ifa Stuoci
logic. The procedures of formal logic are logically, test his thinking in termiS
transferred here.
Similárity of principle
LTransfer of technique and principle are akin to each other.
the principles learned in one Roberts (1932) in his study rouf
situation were applied in another situation and thus, the similarity
principle made new learning easier. Similarly Katona (1908) in a
in human adults, showed that
when study of puzzle solving of one ant
kind of problem, they solved new subjects were taught the principle involved in solution
problems also as this too
other hand, those who did not learn the involved the similar principle.
principle, failed to show such transfer.
Chapter 11 Some Other Principles (Theoriea) and Aspects of Learning 317