What About the Children: Youth Policy as a Social Contract Test in Tunisia
This paper delves into the fluid nature of the state in Middle Eastern politics, particularly within
Maghrebi countries shaped by their struggles against French colonialism. It was inspired by a
period of intense global turbulence that motivated a budding observer to reflect on the state’s
evolving role for a university newspaper. Although the piece garnered limited attention, it stands
as a crucial snapshot of a transformative moment in global relations, deserving preservation to
complement other historical images and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of
these dynamics.
Focusing on Tunisia under Zine-El-Abidine Ben Ali, the paper explores how the state's failure to
fulfill its redistributive and mass political responsibilities led to widespread discontent among
the youth. Under Ben Ali's nearly three-decade rule, Tunisia’s state mechanisms failed to
address high youth unemployment and educational mismatches, exacerbating feelings of neglect
and disillusionment. The paper examines how Ben Ali’s regime, despite its efforts, increasingly
disconnected from its foundational social contract with the people, particularly the youth and
women.
Following the Arab Spring, Tunisia undertook significant reforms aimed at revitalizing its
redistributive functions and improving youth engagement. However, despite these efforts,
challenges persist. The paper assesses the progress made in post-revolution Tunisia, noting
incremental improvements but also highlighting ongoing issues such as rising unemployment
and socio-economic exclusion. The analysis suggests that while the new government has shown
commitment to reform, substantial work remains to fully reintegrate young Tunisians into the
political and economic fabric of the country.
The state as an institution in Middle Eastern politics is a fluid entity. At different times, it
has manifested different understandings, meanings, and conventions between the people and the
powers that be. Maghrebi states in particular were shaped by their struggle against French
colonialism. These states formulated an unwritten social contract between the people on what
goods the state was responsible for in exchange for legitimacy. These responsibilities can be
broken down into two main groups: redistributive powers and mass political powers.
Redistributive powers stipulated that the state should organize and provide accessibility to a
great selection of social services and benefits. Mass political powers meant that the state invested
itself in dialogue and protection not just of citizens, but also of labor organizations, classes of
workers, and workers’ interests. Altogether, this provided a serviceable framework for
responsible engagement of citizens with their government.
Certain governments failed to execute faithfully their responsibilities to this end. Zine-El-
Abidine Ben Ali, a despot who ruled over Tunisia for almost three decades, who took his roots
from another three-decade dictatorship, ruled over a country that suffered a crushing
unemployment crisis amongst young people. Whatever steps it took to rectify the situation
served to expose how detached it had become from its purpose inscribed in the social contract.
This paper will explore how negligent Ben Ali’s regime had become towards young people, and
ask whether the Arab Spring rectified the ailments begat by Ben Ali’s neglect. Youth
engagement policy in Tunisia lent to the failure of the Tunisian state as a redistributive
institution and movement of mass politics. In the aftermath of the Arab Spring, youth
engagement policy became a juggernaut of economic and civic projects, but the prospects leave
much to be desired.
State-Centered Failures Prior to the Tunisian Revolution
During the reign of Ben Ali, the Tunisian political system as a redistributive state yielded
low returns for the Tunisian youth. Since the Tunisian political system is structured around the
easy access to mass public goods like education, the Tunisian youth has developed cyclically
high rates of educational attainment1. Nevertheless, due to lagging changes in the educational
system, by the end of Ben Ali’s tenure, a market failure occurred: the system was overproducing
white collar workers who could not get jobs (thus, chronically without experience), while the
market was only undersaturated in experienced tradespeople 2. This represented a failure of the
state as a redistributive mechanism. Where the state was meant to give access opportunities that
would engender shared prosperity in the future, the economic gain was residual and diminishing,
since those opportunities no longer matched up to the economic realities of the global and
domestic paradigm inhabited by Tunisia. The problem is so dire that it began to inflame itself.
Data shows that education became a last resort for Tunisians unable to find work, as the last 20
years of Ben Ali’s regime saw dramatic upticks in enrolment of students who are not
matriculating directly out of secondary school 3. Even the sheer form of education and its
compatibility with the labor market seems to be an issue for Tunisians. Vocational degrees are
seen as lower-worth in Tunisia, and the system was framed around this notion, wherein students
are often relegated to the vocational track for underperformance 4. The redistributive capacity of
the state here not only failed to redistribute the possibilities for prosperity, but furthermore, failed
to adapt itself considering the inveterate cultural and structural impediments that arose. Perhaps
1
Boughzala 3
2
Boughzala 5
3
Haouas et al. 398
4
Haouas et al. 403
most insidiously, even outside of education, state actors, sometimes individuals, began misusing
their office to extort money from young people for access to the sheer basic services that were
previously tacitly understood to be accessible to the people 5. While corruption had always been
an issue endemic to Tunisia, certain forms of corruption began to evolve that made access to
business development assistance or even paperwork unfeasible for a budding entrepreneur, most
of whom are young people6. When young people cannot rely on the redistributive frameworks, or
even purely bureaucratic frameworks, for their livelihood, this creates the unemployment
emergency that existed in Ben Ali’s Tunisia. As the youth found themselves at dead ends
regardless of which route they pursued, whether it be commerce or higher education, they found
the state negligent or actively counterproductive in helping them reach shared prosperity.
Naturally, when such a contrast between the state’s promise to be an institution of redistributive
wellbeing occurs, young people will feel that the state has failed them.
In the same manner, for the duration of Ben Ali’s reign of Tunisia, the youth of Tunisia
felt disengaged from the state as it weakened its ties to them as a state built on mass politics.
Tunisia, like its Maghrebi counterparts, underwent its genesis with a strong nationalist
movement, paired along with a heavy dose of mass politics7. This is plainly seen as the political
system in Tunisia was upheld by a nationalist-liberationist party along with the largest labor
rights organization in the country8. Tunisia under Ben Ali failed to keep included the youth
contingent of the citizenry. When the unemployment crisis began to fester, the government saw
clearly that the crisis was localized almost uniquely to young people 9. The government
5
Honwana 7
6
Ibid.
7
World Bank 2004: 30
8
Ibid.
9
Haouas et al. 409-410
recognized the obligation to perform various flavors of intervention as part of the mass politics
theme, but its intervention often skirted the young people and helped the demographic entities
that were not in dire straits10. Even when Ben Ali himself would make rare public
pronouncements about the unenviable hand of the young people in Tunisia, the solutions outlined
by him (and never realized) are poorly-disguised conduits for propaganda purposes, such as
youth training centers, and a host of educational youth media 11. Tunisia evidently accepted the
loss of its young people and their economic desires. This is not rare in a neoliberal economic
order. Simultaneously, while Tunisia posed itself as a state led by a mass political movement, it
was callous and myopic to disregard such a massive demographic from the movement. A sub-
demographic hit particularly hard by this disengagement are women. Towards the end of Ben
Ali’s administration, both employment and educational attainment rates declined for women 12.
This is especially surprising, considering the accent made by the Tunisian government towards
female participation in all spheres of society throughout Ben Ali’s rule. Moreover, despite
government programs meant to mitigate female disengagement (such as more flexible hours and
accessibility), up to the end of the regime of Ben Ali, females did not participate more 13. The
state neglected to overhaul the growing exclusion of one half of the youth. At best, the state was
willfully negligent towards this contingent. At worst, it idly stood by as such a meaningful group
of people was distanced from the nation’s mass political movement. Oftentimes, Tunisia would
not hide its disaffection with the young people, optioning to curry favor with international
partners. Zouhair El Kadhi, head of the economics program at the University of Tunisia,
summarizes the disconnect: “The government was often more preoccupied with pleasing the
10
Boughzala 7
11
Murphy 647
12
Boughzala 11-12
13
Ibid.
international institutions rather than looking at what was good and effective for the country, and
the education policy was one such instance” 14. When the Tunisian government decided to replace
the approval of its own people – its largest component, it betrayed the spirit of the mass political
movement from whom it claimed lineage. It is hardly surprising that so many young Tunisians
felt totally detached from their state, when their state proclaimed that its raison d’etre was to
continuously mobilize people for their own benefit. From such a point of view, Tunisia refused
to execute its social contract responsibilities diligently. At most times, the state let the situation
fester. At other inflection points, it simulated engagement that did nothing but reinforce the
status quo.
Piecemeal Progress in the Aftermath of the Tunisian Revolution
The economic crisis plaguing Tunisian youth has yet to be defeated, but that does not
reduce from the decisive strides forward undertaken in recent years. From a capabilities
approach, after Ben Ali, Tunisia undertook efforts to return to a redistributive mechanism. While
these changes were not the wide-sweeping offerings from the Neo-Destour days, the Tunisian
government engaged several foreign governments to clean up its bureaucracy, improve access to
commercial assistance, and even welcomed foreign funding to amplify the sums offered 15. It
does not seem, unfortunately, that these overhauls produced the effect desired. According to a
World Bank study of employment rates in the years after the revolution, unemployment and
educational abstention continued to increase for women, a lack of incentives to create more
tradespeople means the unemployment rate remains where it was, and, more recently,
skyrocketing urbanization amongst young people exacerbated the existing unemployment
14
Honwana 12
15
Destremau 8
crisis16. There are multiple ways to interpret this. Naturally, the removal of a longstanding
dictator does not assume that effective changes will be adopted immediately. Young Tunisians
keep pressing the government to do more for their welfare 17. Economic networks are never
endogenous, however, and the problems suffered by young Tunisians beset overqualified young
people around the world. Although there remains work to be done by Tunisia to return to its
promissory social contract, there is reason to believe that this hope will eventually bear fruit.
Tunisia as a mass politics institution provides more to young people than it did at the
close of the Ben Ali regime, but more needs to be done to reduce the persisting social exclusion
of young people. The Tunisian revolution pressed Tunisians to reconsider the notion of
belonging to a mass political movement; however, the expectation of government for inclusion
remains18. The new Tunisian governments invited foreign partners to reconstruct the institutions
where the social engagement with youth can happen19. This frequently manifests in forums,
roundtables, retreats, and trainings20. Admittedly, this is not a mass politics arena where the
unemployment crisis can be solved, but it is a conscientious step forward from before. In a larger
lens, nevertheless, the problem of unemployment made the ailment worse. World Bank
socioeconomic research found that the number of young people in Tunisia who are so embittered
with the system that they feel they will not gain employment in the foreseeable future keeps
rising21. This should be considered together with the new urbanization, wherein young people
come to metropoles with little connections and resources to be included in the mass politics 22. In
16
World Bank 2015: 38
17
Murphy 681
18
Somi 11
19
Somi 12
20
Ibid.
21
World Bank 2015: 24
22
World Bank 2015: 26
sum, it is clear that the new Tunisian governments demonstrated the will and decisiveness to
reincorporate young Tunisians into spaces where mass politics are developed. However,
considering the worsening unemployment situation, compounded with fresh challenges, present a
formidable task to be solved, which cannot happen instantaneously. The goodwill gestures
foretoken a positive outcome.
Tunisia remains a state in transition, even eight years after the Arab Spring. It is not so
important to ask whether problems are solved as it is to measure the progress made. The Ben Ali
government found itself incapable to help the most vulnerable, precarious class of society, opting
to stonewall and grandstand around the problem, instead of addressing it. While Ben Ali is now
gone and the problems are slowly transferred to the current governments, their bona fides is
incontrovertible: regardless of their political positions and stance, they are not skimming
percentages and intent on constructing bureaucratic tangles. It will take time for Tunisia to
realize its place in the region, and it will take time for Tunisians to understand their place inside
their own government. Until that happens, solving other problems is unlikely to happen.
Tunisians won back the most important object they could: a mutual commitment to the social
contract brokered consensually all those years ago. That dedication they have is an assurance of a
brighter future.
Boughzala, Mongi. “Youth Unemployment and Economic Transition in Tunisia.” Global
Economy and Development, vol. 2, no. 1, 15 Feb. 2013, pp. 1–27.
Bodenmann, Samuel. “After Jasmine: What Happened to Tunisia's Youth after Ben Ali?”
Journal of Middle Eastern Sociological Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, 1 Mar. 2013, pp. 1–23.
Destremau, Blandine, et al. “Governing Youth, Managing Society: A Comparative Overview of
Six Country Case Studies.” Power to Youth, vol. 14, no. 1, 15 June 2016, pp. 1–30.
Gray, Simon. “Breaking Barriers to Youth Inclusion in Tunisia.” World Bank Reports Series,
vol. 1, no. 1, 1 Dec. 2014, pp. 1–83.
Haouas, Ilham, et al. “Youth Unemployment in Tunisia: Characteristics and Policy Responses.”
Middle Eastern and North African Economics, vol. 14, no. 1, 1 Sept. 2012, pp. 395–420.
Honwana, Alcinda. “Youth and the Tunisian Revolution.” Conflict Prevention and Peace, vol.
24, 1 Jan. 2012, pp. 1–20.
Murphy, Emma C. “A Political Economy of Youth Policy in Tunisia.” New Political Economy,
vol. 22, no. 7, 11 Apr. 2017, pp. 676–691.
Somi, Omar. “Youth Policy in Tunisia: The Internationalization of Youth as a Public Policy
Issue.” Power to Youth, vol. 9, no. 1, 1 May 2016, pp. 1–14.
World Bank, Unlocking the Employment Potential in the Middle East and North Africa: Toward
a New Social Contract (2004): Chapter Two.
Yousef, Tarik M., “Development, Growth and Policy Reform in the Middle East and North
Africa since 1950,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 18, no. 3 (2004): 91-115.