Machine Learning Techniques for Adaptive Spectrum

Utilization in Cognitive Radio Networks

M. L. Bharath Kumar1, K. Karthick2, S. Sri Santhosh3
SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Tamil Nadu – 621106

to fill this gap by providing an exhaustive

Abstract—The exponential growth in wireless classification and survey of machine learning
communication demands has led to overcrowded approaches for intelligent spectrum management,
radio spectra. Traditional fixed spectrum allocation along with identifying new research directions and
policies result in inefficient utilization, prompting
unresolved issues.
research into dynamic spectrum access (DSA) through
Cognitive Radio (CR) technology. CR can detect and
II. Literature Survey
use underutilized spectrum bands, alleviating
spectrum scarcity. This paper surveys machine
The literature survey on dynamic spectrum
learning techniques for intelligent spectrum
management in CR networks, including spectrum management (DSM) in cognitive radio (CR)
sensing, decision-making, sharing, and mobility. We networks indicates that there is extensive research
classify and evaluate these techniques, highlighting focused on addressing the spectrum scarcity
their strengths and limitations. Our survey provides problem through various spectrum management
insights into optimizing cognitive radio networks and techniques. However, there is a notable lack of
identifies new research directions and open issues for
comprehensive surveys that specifically address the
further exploration.
use of machine learning techniques in this context.
Keywords—Cognitive Radio, dynamic spectrum Akyildiz et al. [1] have discussed cross-layer design
management, heterogeneous networks, intelligent approaches in CR networks, emphasizing the
techniques, machine learning
importance of integrating different network layers
I. Introduction to enhance spectrum management. Their work,
The rapid proliferation of wireless communication while foundational, does not delve deeply into the
services has led to an unprecedented demand for application of machine learning for DSM.
radio spectrum, resulting in significant
overcrowding. Traditional fixed spectrum allocation Recent surveys by authors such as Abbas et al. [2]
policies have proven inadequate, often leading to have explored machine learning techniques for
inefficient spectrum utilization. This inefficiency specific CR tasks like spectrum sensing and
has necessitated the development of advanced decision making. However, these studies do not
techniques for dynamic spectrum access. Cognitive provide a holistic view of DSM that includes
Radio (CR) technology emerges as a viable spectrum sharing and spectrum mobility.
solution, capable of addressing spectrum scarcity by
Other researchers, including Zafari et al. [3], have
leveraging underutilized spectrum bands. The future
highlighted the necessity of learning capabilities in
of network deployment envisions the coexistence of
CR networks to manage spectrum efficiently in
multiple heterogeneous radio access networks, each
uncertain environments. They have pointed out that
with distinct characteristics. This scenario poses a
learning techniques are crucial for estimating
significant challenge for CR networks in terms of
channel characteristics and reducing error
optimal network selection. Effective
probabilities in CR networks.
implementation of CR technology mandates
intelligent spectrum management strategies. Despite The survey by Thilina et al. [4] provides a broader
extensive research, a comprehensive survey perspective on machine learning applications in CR
focusing on the integration of machine learning networks but lacks a focused discussion on DSM as
techniques for dynamic spectrum management in a whole. Their work primarily addresses individual
CR networks remains unavailable. This paper aims aspects such as spectrum sensing or decision
making rather than integrating these with sharing
and mobility.

Kaur and Kumar [5] address this gap by providing

a detailed classification and comprehensive survey
of various machine learning techniques for
intelligent spectrum management in CR networks.
They discuss techniques such as Artificial Neural
Networks, Met heuristic Algorithms, Support
Vector Machines, Bayesian Learning, Game
Theory, and Hidden Markov Models, evaluating
their strengths and limitations in the context of
DSM. Their survey highlights the necessity of
incorporating learning as a critical component for
efficient spectrum management in CR networks.

The major contributions of Kaur and Kumar's

survey include a comprehensive taxonomy of
intelligent techniques, an evaluation of these
techniques in major CR tasks, an overview of state-
of-the-art achievements, and a discussion of
research issues and future directions. Their work is
a significant step towards integrating machine
learning into DSM in CR networks, providing a
foundation for further research in this area.

In summary, while there has been substantial

research on various aspects of spectrum
management in CR networks, Kaur and Kumar's
comprehensive survey fills a critical gap by
addressing the application of machine learning
techniques to the complete spectrum management
framework, including spectrum sensing, decision
making, sharing, and mobility.

III. Methodology
A. Data Collection and Pre-processing Spectrum Decision: Develop a decision-making
module that dynamically selects the best available
Spectrum Data Acquisition: Gather spectrum spectrum bands based on the predictions from the
usage data from various primary users (PUs) and spectrum sensing module. This module should
secondary users (SUs) using advanced spectrum consider factors such as channel quality, interference
analyzers and sensors. Ensure that the data covers a levels, and user requirements.
wide range of frequency bands and includes both
temporal and spatial information.

Data Cleaning: Apply data cleaning techniques to

remove noise and inconsistencies from the collected
data. This step involves handling missing values,
filtering out irrelevant data points, and normalizing
the data to a standard format.

Feature Extraction: Extract relevant features from

the cleaned data. Key features may include signal
strength, frequency occupancy, bandwidth usage,
and temporal patterns. Use domain knowledge and
statistical methods to identify the most significant
features for spectrum analysis.
Resource Allocation: Design a resource allocation
strategy that optimizes the use of available spectrum
B. Machine Learning Model Development
resources. The strategy should ensure fair and
efficient spectrum sharing among multiple users
Algorithm Selection: Evaluate and select while minimizing interference and maximizing
appropriate machine learning algorithms for throughput.
spectrum sensing, decision-making, and resource
allocation. Potential candidates include Deep
Adaptive Learning: Integrate an adaptive learning
Learning (DL) models, Reinforcement Learning
component that continuously updates the machine
(RL), and Transfer Learning techniques.
learning models based on real-time feedback and
new data. This component should enhance the
Model Training: Train the selected machine system’s ability to adapt to changing spectrum
learning models using the pre-processed dataset. conditions and improve its performance over time.
Employ techniques such as cross-validation and
hyper parameter tuning to optimize model
Dissimulation and Real-World Implementation
performance. Ensure the models are capable of
handling dynamic and uncertain spectrum
environments.

Model Evaluation: Assess the performance of the

trained models using standard metrics such as
accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Compare
the results with baseline models and state-of-the-art
techniques to validate the effectiveness of the
proposed models.

C. Dynamic Spectrum Access Framework

Spectrum Sensing: Implement an intelligent

spectrum sensing mechanism using the trained
machine learning models. The system should be able
to detect spectrum holes and identify idle frequency
bands in real-time.
Simulation Setup: Create a simulation environment node based on the pheromone levels and a
to test the proposed dynamic spectrum access heuristic value.
framework. Use realistic propagation models and Local Pheromone Update: Update the
network scenarios to evaluate the system’s pheromone levels locally as each ant moves,
performance under various conditions.
reinforcing the paths taken.
Global Pheromone Update: After all ants
Performance Analysis: Conduct extensive
simulations to analyze the system’s performance in have completed their paths, update the
terms of spectrum utilization, interference pheromone levels globally to reflect the
management, and user satisfaction. Compare the quality of the solutions found.
results with existing methods to demonstrate the Stopping Condition: Terminate the
advantages of the proposed approach. algorithm after a predefined number of
iterations or when a satisfactory solution is
Field Trials: Implement the dynamic spectrum
achieved.
access framework in a real-world cognitive radio
network. Perform field trials to validate the system’s
effectiveness in practical scenarios and gather 3. Support Vector Machine (SVM):
feedback for further improvements. Feature Extraction: Extract relevant features
from the input data, considering both time-
varying and space-varying characteristics of
IV. Implementation mobile cognitive radios (CRs).
1. Genetic Algorithm (GA): Training: Train the SVM classifier using
Initialization: Begin by encoding the problem the
parameters into chromosomes. Each gene within the extracted features, aiming to distinguish
chromosome represents a specific parameter such as between different classes (e.g., spectrum
data rate, frequency, bandwidth, error rate, and
occupancy states).
modulation/coding scheme.
Prediction: Use the trained SVM model to
Fitness Evaluation: Assign fitness points to each predict spectrum mobility and make decisions
gene based on its contribution to the overall on spectrum usage based on the classification
objective, such as spectrum efficiency. results.
Selection: Choose the fittest chromosomes to
pass their genes to the next generation. V. Conclusion
Crossover: Perform crossover operations to
exchange genes between pairs of selected The paper has provided a comprehensive review and
chromosomes, thereby creating new classification of intelligent techniques for Dynamic
offspring. Spectrum Management (DSM) in Cognitive Radio
Mutation: Apply mutation operations to (CR) networks. For efficient realization, CRs are
introduce small changes to genes in the combined with intelligent techniques to facilitate
chromosomes, promoting genetic diversity. dynamic and intelligent spectrum management. The
Iteration: Repeat the selection, crossover, and intelligent spectrum management schemes have been
mutation processes for several generations surveyed in the context of spectrum sensing,
until the optimal solution is found. spectrum decision, spectrum sharing, and spectrum
mobility. The primary emphasis of this work is to
elaborate on the role of intelligent techniques in
2. Ant Colony Optimization (ACO): enhancing the learning capabilities of CRs. We have
Initialization: Initialize the pheromone levels presented state-of-the-art achievements in applying
on all edges of the graph representing the intelligent techniques for DSM along with their
problem. strengths and limitations, offering an overview of
Ant Deployment: Deploy a number of active research in dynamic spectrum management
artificial ants to traverse the graph, where within CR networks. Unluckily, available techniques
for spectrum management still lack ample reflection
each ant probabilistically chooses the next
of various network parameters in real-world
 scenarios, which are quite complex to model. Communication Systems, 31(5), e3495.
[https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3495](https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.
Therefore, some model-free schemes will become 3495)
increasingly important. In future work, eliciting and
encouraging cooperative behaviour through rewards [10] 10. Bengio, Y., Yao, L., Alain, G., & Vincent, P. (2013).
Generalized denoising auto-encoders as generative models. In
and mechanism design will become crucial and Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural
promising areas for further research. Information Processing Systems (pp. 899–907). Neural
Information Processing Systems (NIPS): Papers published at
the Neural Information Processing Systems Conference
VI.REFERENCES
[11] 11. Bing, Y., Rui, Y., & Ye, F. (2010). Non-cooperative
spectrum allocation based on game theory in cognitive radio
[1] 1. Abbas, N., Nasser, Y., & El Ahmad, K. (2015). Recent networks. In Proceedings of 5th IEEE International
advances on artificial intelligence and learning techniques in Conference on Bio-Inspired Computing: Theories and
cognitive radio networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Applications (BIC-TA) (pp. 1134–1137). Changsha.
Communications and Networking, 2015(1), 174. [https://doi.org/10.1109/BICTA.2010.5645094](https://doi.org
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-015-0381-7](https://doi.org/10 /10.1109/BICTA.2010.5645094)
.1186/s13638-015-0381-7)
[12] 12. Bkassiny, M., Li, Y., & Jayaweera, S. K. (2013). A survey
[2] 2. Akbar, I. A., & Tranter, W. H. (2007). Dynamic spectrum on machine-learning techniques in cognitive radios. IEEE
allocation in cognitive radio using hidden Markov models: Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(3), 1136–1159.
Poisson distributed case. In Proceeding of IEEE SoutheastCon [https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2012.100412.00017](https://doi
(pp. 196–201). Richmond, VA. .org/10.1109/SURV.2012.100412.00017)
[https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2007.342884](https://doi.org/
10.1109/SECON.2007.342884) [13] 13. Burges, C. J. C. (1998). A tutorial on support vector
machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge
[3] 3. Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W. Y., Vuran, M. C., & Mohanty, S. Discovery, 2(2), 121–167.
(2006). NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive [https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009715923555](https://doi.org/10.
radio wireless networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 1023/A:1009715923555)
50(13), 2127–2159.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2006.05.001](https://doi.org/ [14] 14. Carpenter, G. A., & Grossberg, S. (1987). ART 2: Self-
10.1016/j.comnet.2006.05.001) organization of stable category recognition codes for analog
input patterns. Applied Optics, 26(23), 4919–4930.
[4] 4. Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W. Y., Vuran, M. C., & Mohanty, S. [https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.26.004919](https://doi.org/10.136
(2008). A survey on spectrum management in cognitive radio 4/AO.26.004919)
networks. IEEE Communication Magazine, 46(4), 40–48.
[https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2008.4481339](https://doi.org
/10.1109/MCOM.2008.4481339)

[5] 5. Awe, O. P., & Lambotharan, S. (2015). Cooperative

spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks using multi-class
support vector machine algorithms. In Proceedings of 9th
International Conference on Signal Processing and
Communication Systems (ICSPCS) (pp. 1–7). Cairns, QLD.
[https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPCS.2015.7391780](https://doi.or
g/10.1109/ICSPCS.2015.7391780)

[6] 6. Awe, O. P., Zhu, Z., & Lambotharan, S. (2013). Eigenvalue

and support vector machine techniques for spectrum sensing
in cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of 2013
Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial
Intelligence (pp. 223–227). Taipei.
[https://doi.org/10.1109/TAAI.2013.52](https://doi.org/10.110
9/TAAI.2013.52)

[7] 7. Baldo, N., & Zorzi, M. (2008). Fuzzy logic for cross-layer
optimization in cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of
4th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking
Conference (Vol. 2007, pp. 1128–1133). Las Vegas, NV.
[https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2008.4481342](https://doi.org
/10.1109/MCOM.2008.4481342)

[8] 8. Bayrakdar, M. E. (2020). Cooperative communication based

access technique for sensor networks. International Journal of
Electronics, 107(2), 212–225.
[https://doi.org/10.1080/00207217.2019.1636313](https://doi.
org/10.1080/00207217.2019.1636313)

[9] 9. Bayrakdar, M. E., & Çalhan, A. (2018). Artificial bee

colony–based spectrum handoff algorithm in wireless
cognitive radio networks. International Journal of