Labour Law 2
Labour Law 2
ANS:
Wage policy in India is a critical component of the country's economic and labor framework.
It plays a pivotal role in ensuring fair compensation to workers, maintaining industrial peace,
and promoting socio-economic development. Here are some key points about wage policy in
India:
1. **Minimum Wage:** The Minimum Wages Act, 1948, is a cornerstone of wage policy in
India. Under this act, both the central and state governments fix and revise minimum wages
for various categories of employment. These minimum wage rates are periodically reviewed
and updated to account for inflation and living costs.
2. **Fair Wage:** The concept of a "fair wage" is an important aspect of wage policy. It
ensures that wages are not only minimum but also fair, considering factors like the skill of
the worker, the nature of the job, and the cost of living.
3. **Equal Remuneration:** India has laws in place that promote equal remuneration for men
and women for the same work or work of a similar nature. This is aimed at reducing gender
wage gaps and promoting gender equality in the workforce.
4. **Living Wage:** While minimum wages are essential, there is also a growing emphasis
on ensuring that wages provide a decent standard of living. The concept of a "living wage" is
gaining traction, which takes into account the basic needs of a worker and their family.
5. **Regular Revision:** Wage policy in India involves periodic revision of wage rates.
Central and state advisory boards, consisting of representatives from employers, employees,
and government officials, often play a role in wage revision decisions.
7. **Skilled Labor:** India's wage policy also recognizes the need to reward skilled labor and
promote skill development. Higher wages are often associated with greater skill and
expertise.
ANS:
Wages Fund Theory: This theory was developed by Adam Smith (1723-1790). His theory was based
on the basic assumption that workers are paid wages out of a pre-determined fund of wealth. This
fund, he called, wages fund created as a result of savings. According to Adam Smith, the demand for
labor and rate of wages depend on the size of the wages fund. According to this theory, therefore,
trade unions cannot raise wages for the labor class as a whole. The efforts of trade unions to raise
wages are futile. If they succeeded in raising wages in one trade, it can only be at the expense of
another, since the wage fund is fixed and the trade unions have no control over population
Wages Fund Theory: This theory was developed by Adam Smith (1723-1790). His theory was based
on the basic assumption that workers are paid wages out of a pre-determined fund of wealth. This
fund, he called, wages fund created as a result of savings. According to Adam Smith, the demand for
labor and rate of wages depend on the size of the wages fund. According to this theory, therefore,
trade unions cannot raise wages for the labor class as a whole. The efforts of trade unions to raise
wages are futile. If they succeeded in raising wages in one trade, it can only be at the expense of
another, since the wage fund is fixed and the trade unions have no control over population
The Surplus Value Theory of Wages This theory was developed by Karl Marx (1849-1883). This
theory is based on the basic assump-tion that like other article, labor is also an article which could be
purchased on payment of its price i.e. wages. This payment, according to Karl Marx, is at
subsistence level which is less than in propor-tion to time labor takes to produce items. The surplus,
according to him, goes to the owner. Karl Marx is well known for his avocation in the favor of labor.
According to Marx, labor is an article or commodity which can be purchased on payment of a price.
The price of any product is determined by the time and effort needed to produce it. The laborer is
not paid in proportion to the time spent and the surplus goes to the management to meet other
expenses.
Marginal Productivity Theory PRAGYA SINGH This theory was propounded by Phillips Henry Wick-
steed (England) and John Bates Clark of U.S.A. According to this theory, wages is determined based
on the production contributed by the last worker, i.e. marginal worker. His/her production is called
„marginal production‟. This theory state that, under the condition of perfect competition, every
worker of same skill and efficiency in a given category will receive a wage equal to the value of the
marginal product of that type of labor. The value of marginal net product of labor may be defined
as being the value of the amount by which output would be increased by employing one more
worker with the appropriate addition of other factors of production.
The Bargaining Theory of Wages John Davidson was the propounder of this theory. According to
this theory, the fixation of wages depends on the bargaining power of workers/trade unions and of
employers. If workers are stronger in bargaining process, then wages tends to be high. In case,
employer plays a stronger role, then wages tends to be low. According to this theory, there is an
upper limit and a lower limit of wage rates and the actual rates between these limits are determined
by the bargaining power of the employers and the workers. John Davidson, the earliest exponent
of the bargaining theory of wages, argued that the wages and hours of work were ultimately
determined by the relative bargaining strength of the employers and the workers .
Behavioral Theories of Wages Based on research studies and action programmes conducted, some
behavioural scientists have also developed theories of wages. Their theories are based on
elements like employee‟s acceptance to a wage level, the prevalent internal wage structure,
employee‟s consideration on money or‟ wages and salaries as motivators. Many behavioral
scientists — notably industrial psychologists and sociologists — like Marsh and Simon, Robert Dubin,
Eliot Jacques have presented their views of wages and salaries, on the basis of research studies and
action programmes conducted by them.
ANS:-
The Act seeks to provide better protection of the rights of the employees by establishing
advisory boards to resolve any dispute between the employer and employee regarding the
payment of minimum wage to the employees. The Act further appoints a Commissioner for
Workmen’s Compensation or any other officer of the Central Government exercising functions
as a Labour Commissioner for any region, with an experience as a judge in order to hear and
decide cases concerning non-payment or payment of less than the minimum wages to the
employees. The Act also states provisions for penalising any employer who fails to provide the
minimum wage to the employer and contravenes any rule or order made under the Act.
1. To fix the minimum rates of wages that are to be provided to the employees and revise
such rates of wages every five years.
2. To secure an adequate living wage for all the labourers in the interest of the public.
3. To fix the daily working hours of the employees.
4. To prevent exploitation of the workers by the employers.
5. To ensure that the labourers can maintain a decent standard of living.
6. To provide basic physical needs, good health and a level of comfort to the employees.
7. To penalise the employers when they fail to provide minimum wages to the workers.
8. To establish advisory boards to regulate and administer the provisions of the Act.
9. To lay down the powers and duties of the inspectors for the purposes of this Act.
10. To prevent any employer from wrongfully infringing the right of any employees.
11. To establish appropriate authorities where the employees can seek redressal when the
employer has failed to pay the daily wage.
12. To authorise the Central and state governments to make rules and regulations for the
purposes of this Act.
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 is applicable to the whole of India as laid down in Section 1 of
the Act. It applies to any employment if it employs 1000 employees in the respective state.
However, it does not apply to any employees in any undertaking owned by the Central
Government or of the federal railway, except with the consent of the Central Government.
17. Different minimum rates of wages may be fixed for; different classes of work, different
scheduled employment, different localities, different age groups, etc.
18. Minimum wages may be fixed by the wage period such as; by the hour, by the day,
etc.
Section 4 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 states that the minimum wages fixed by the
appropriate government must consist of: A basic rate of wages and a special allowance must
be adjusted at necessary intervals by the appropriate government to match the cost of living of
the employees.
Section 5 states that in order to fix or revise the minimum wage of the employees the
appropriate government may establish as many committees and subcommittees necessary to
hold enquiries in matters regarding fixing and revision of minimum wage.
Advisory board
Under Section 7 the appropriate government must appoint advisory boards for coordinating
the work of the committees and subcommittees mentioned in Section 5 and also for advising
the appropriate government generally in the matter of fixing and revising minimum rates of
wages.
Committees
Section 9 of the Act states that the members of committees, sub-committees, and Advisory
Boards shall be appointed by the appropriate government. Individuals who are appointed to
these committees shall be representatives of employers and employees in scheduled
employments and shall be equal in number. The appropriate government shall appoint such
an independent person to be the Chairman of the committee.
Inspectors
In this Act, the appropriate government by notification to the official gazette shall appoint
inspectors in a manner prescribed under the Act. The inspectors shall be liable to exercise
their functions within the local limits of their jurisdiction.
22. The inspectors shall enter the premises or places within the local limits of their
jurisdiction where the employees are employed to work in respect of which minimum
rates of wages have been fixed under this Act, for the purpose of examining the
register, record of wages, etc.
23. To examine any person on the premises or places who is an employee.
24. Seize or take copies of registers, records of wages, or other required documents under
this act which he may consider relevant in case of commission of any offence.
25. The inspector will be required to exercise any other power as may be prescribed under
the Act.
26. The employer has used due diligence in the execution of all the provisions of the Act.
27. The other person has committed the offence without his knowledge, connivance or
consent. Then in that case the other will be held liable as if he were the employer and
the employer will be discharged.
ANS:
Fixation and Revision of Minimum Wages
By Sanskar01 | Views 23277
The fixation and revision of minimum wages is an important aspect of labour and
employment regulations in many countries. Minimum wage laws are designed to
establish a baseline level of compensation that employers must pay to workers for their
labour. The purpose of these laws is to protect workers from exploitation, ensure fair
compensation, and provide a decent standard of living.
The process of fixing and revising minimum wages typically involves a combination of
legislative action, government agencies, and consultation with stakeholders such as
trade unions, employers' associations, and worker representatives. The specific
procedures and institutions involved can vary from country to country. The concept of
minimum wages in India was brought in the year 1920 by Mr. K.G.R Chaudhary, who
proposed the bill to formulate the policy of minimum wages at the International Labour
Conference.
The bill was brought in 1946, and by 1948, the bill of Minimum Wages Act was enforced
to save the rights of the workers. The provisions of the Act are intended to achieve the
objective of doing social justice to workers employed in the scheduled employment by
prescribing the minimum rate of wages for them. In other words, the Act aims to
provide a statutory fixation of minimum wages with a view to preventing the
exploitation of labor.
It's important to note that the specific processes and mechanisms for fixing and revising
minimum wages can vary significantly across different countries and jurisdictions. The
above overview provides a general framework, but the actual procedures and practices
may differ depending on the legal, economic, and political context of each country.
2. Preventing Exploitation:
The Act seeks to protect vulnerable workers from exploitation by setting a floor
on wages. It aims to prevent the payment of unreasonably low wages that can
lead to unfair labour practices, including forced labour, sweatshop conditions,
and abusive employment relationships.
It's important to note that the objectives of the Minimum Wages Act may be influenced
by the specific social, economic, and political context of each country or jurisdiction. The
Act's effectiveness in achieving these objectives can depend on factors such as
enforcement mechanisms, compliance rates, and the level of cooperation among
various stakeholders, including employers, workers, and government authorities.
The basic rate of wages with or without house rent allowance based on the cost of living
index number of the employee
All-inclusive rates for the basic rate of wages with the cost of living allowances and cash
value of concessional supply of materials
The term minimum wages has not been defined under the provision of the Minimum
Wages Act, 1948 presumably because it would not be possible to lay down a uniform
minimum wage for all industries throughout the country on account of different and
varying conditions prevailing from one industry to another.
Scheduled Employments:
The Act categorizes specific employments into schedules based on the nature of work,
industry, and geographic region. Each schedule includes different occupations or
industries for which minimum wages need to be fixed. The number and nature of
scheduled employment may vary from state to state.
As far as section 5 of the Minimum Wages Act is concerned, there are two modes of
procedures for fixing and revising the minimum wages. One common thing among both
of the procedures is to empower the Government in reaching a favorable result
regarding the fixation of minimum wage.
The two modes of fixing and revising minimum wages can be categorized as
follows:
Committee Method
Under the Minimum Wages Act, of 1948 in India, the committee method is a mechanism
used for the fixation and revision of minimum wages for certain scheduled
employments. The committee method involves the establishment of committees that
play a crucial role in conducting inquiries, examining relevant factors, and making
recommendations for the fixation and revision of minimum wages.
Here's an overview of the committee method under the Minimum Wages Act:
4. Examination of Factors:
The committee examines various factors that influence wage determination,
considering both economic and social aspects. These factors may include living
conditions, social needs, productivity levels, regional variations, and the impact
of proposed wage rates on workers and employers.
5. Stakeholder Consultation:
The committee may engage in consultations with stakeholders such as
employers' associations, trade unions, worker representatives, and other
interested parties. These consultations provide an opportunity for stakeholders
to present their views, concerns, and suggestions regarding the fixation and
revision of minimum wages.
7. Government Decision:
The government reviews the recommendations made by the Minimum Wages
Fixation Committee and takes a decision on the fixation or revision of minimum
wages. The government considers the committee's report along with other
relevant factors, such as economic conditions, legal requirements, and
administrative feasibility.
Notification Method
Under the Minimum Wages Act, of 1948 in India, the notification method is used for the
fixation and implementation of minimum wages for various scheduled employments.
The notification method involves the issuance of an official notification by the
appropriate government specifying the minimum rates of wages applicable to the
scheduled employment.
Here's an overview of the notification method under the Minimum Wages Act:
4. Preparation of Notification:
Once the minimum wages are determined, the government prepares an official
notification. The notification specifies the minimum rates of wages applicable to
each scheduled employment. It includes details such as the effective date, the
period of applicability, wage components (basic wages, dearness allowance, etc.),
and any other relevant provisions.
The notification method provides a legally binding mechanism for the fixation and
implementation of minimum wages. It ensures that employers are aware of their
obligations and workers are entitled to receive the prescribed minimum wages for their
labour. The method allows for transparency and uniformity in wage determination
across scheduled employment while facilitating compliance and enforcement.
Penalties
As per section 22 of the Minimum Wages Act, the penalties may be charged in the
case if:
• The employees pay less than the minimum wages prescribed by the Act
• The employer does not comply with the provisions given in section 13 of the Act
If there is an act of omission of acts by the employer, then a notice specifying the same
can be exhibited in a prescribed manner on the premises in which the employment is
carried on.
ANS:
It was decided at the second and third meetings of the eighteenth Session of the
Standing Labour Committee (G.O.I) in New Delhi in March/April 1960 to appoint a
Commission to look into the issue of bonuses and develop appropriate norms. The
Government of India established a Tripartite Commission to examine the issue of bonus
payments based on earnings to employees working in establishments in a detailed
manner and make recommendations to the Government.
The bonus commission in its report suggested "It is difficult to define in rigid terms the
concept of bonus, but it is possible to urge that once the profits exceed a certain base,
labour should legitimately have a share in them. In other words, we think it to construe
the concept of bonus as sharing by the workers in the prosperity of the concern in
which they are employed.
This has also the advantage that in the case of low paid workers sharing in prosperity
augments their earnings to bridge the gap between the actual wage and the need-
based wage. If it is not feasible to better the standard of living of all the industrial and
agricultural workers as aimed at in Article 43 of the Constitution it is nothing wrong in
endeavoring to do so in respect of those workers whose efforts have contributed to the
profits of the concern in which they have worked.
The validity of such a conception of bonus is not affected by the difficulty of determining
or qualifying precisely the living wage or even the �need-based:� wage at any given
time and place. It appears tows that a properly conceived bonus system that is linked to
profit also imparts a measure of desirable flexibility to wage structure. The workers are
enabled to share in the prosperity of the concern without disturbing the underlying-
basic wage structure.�
Eligibility For Bonus Under The Act
The payment of bonus is a statutory right under the act and According to the Section 8
of the act, any employer who has worked for a minimum of 30 days in an accounting
year, shall be eligible for a bonus.
In East Asiatic Co. Ltd. Vs Industrial Tribunal 3, it was held that a retrenched
employee is eligible for bonus if they worked for a min of 30 days and have a salary of
10,000 pm in a year.
In the case of J. K. Ginning & Pressing Factory v. Second Labour Court, Akola &
Others 4, a factory employed ten seasonal employees, and the issue of their bonus
eligibility arose. The Bombay High Court ruled that the Act does not exclude such
seasonal workers from employment; the only criterion for eligibility is that they meet
the Section 8 requirements. As a result, even seasonal employees were deemed to be
entitled to bonus payments under the Act.
• Fraud, or
• Riotous or violent behavior while on the premises of the establishment, or
• Theft, misappropriation or sabotage of any property of the establishment
The appellant, a bus conductor working for a government of Tamil Nadu undertaking,
was dismissed from service in Pandian Roadways Corporation Ltd. vs. Presiding
Officer 5. Following that, the petitioner and management reached an agreement, and
the petitioner as appointed as a new entrant. Following that, the petitioner claimed an
bonus of rs 1,842 for the duration after his re-appointment. the court ruled in the case
that " If an employee is dismissed from service, he is disqualified from receiving any
bonus under the said Act, not just the bonus for the accounting year," the court ruled.
In Gammon India Ltd Vs Niranjan Das 6, the court held that an employee who is
dismissed from service for fraud, riotous or aggressive behaviour on the premises of
the company, or who is guilty of theft, misappropriation, or sabotage of any
establishment's property is disqualified from receiving bonus for the accounting year
under section 9 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. A dismissed employee who has
been reinstated with back pay has evidently not committed the above crimes and has
not been fired. As a result, he is entitled to a bonus.
1. Right to claim bonus due under the Act, which allows them to make a request to
the government for payment and recovery of bonus amounts that are not paid
to them within one year of their due date
2. The right to take any dispute to a Labour Court or Tribunal; however, it is
necessary to remember that employees who are not entitled to bonuses are
unable to take their case to a Labour Court or Tribunal.
3. Right to seek clarity to obtain details about whatever products are in the name of
the business so that they can determine whether or not they are being fairly
compensated for their services.
The rights available to the Employer against any exploitation or the protection of
their business are given as below:
1. Rights to bring any dispute to the Labour Court or the Tribunal over a request for
an interpretation of any clause of the Act.
2. Right to deduct a fair amount from an employee's bonus on account of a bonus
already paid as a festival bonus or in the event of a monetary loss caused by the
employee's misbehaviour.
3. Right to deduct the value of a bonus paid to an employee who has been fired for
misbehaviour, offensive behaviour, or obstructing the establishment's land.
An annual bonus would be paid to all workers whose salaries do not exceed a certain
monthly sum (to be determined by the federal or state governments). Bonuses are paid
on the higher of the minimum wage or the wage limit set by the relevant government.
Along the lines of the Payment of Bonus Act, the Code on wages lists disqualifications
for receiving bonuses. It should be noted, however, that the Code also states that
removal from service due to a conviction for sexual assault would be provided a ground
for disqualification of bonus under the Code.
Conclusion
The Payment of Bonus Act of 1965 aims to legalise the practise of various
establishments paying bonuses. It provides a mechanism for calculating bonus based
on profit and performance. It allows workers to make more money than the minimum
wage or salary. This Act establishes various procedures for different types of
businesses, such as banks and government agencies, as well as businesses that are not
corporations or firms. This Act also establishes a rigorous redress process in addition to
the procedure.
The main objective behind implementation of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
was to provide payment by employers to employees in the form of compensation for
any loss or injuries suffered by employees in an accident. At the time of enactment this
act was referred to as Workmen Compensation Act but later on it was renamed
as Employee�s Compensation Act, 1923 on 18th January,2010[1] the reason behind
this is that now employees in clerical capacity are also entitled for compensation.
For any organization or company employees are considered to be the most asset and a
valuable resource. They play an integral role in success of a company. Their major or
key function is to achieve the desired goals in a company. In return they do expect
certain kind of security from the employers in the form of security of their jobs and
compensation for any sort of expenses incurred by them for the success of the
organization. An employee ensures the success for an organization by meeting
deadlines for work on time and ensuring customer satisfaction.
Now when it comes to employer it is very important to understand it's meaning well for that lets refer to section
2(e) of the Employee's Compensation Act 1923:
All these factors contribute for compensation to be paid to employees. But as every side
has two aspects similarly there are certain conditions where employers are not liable to
pay any sort of compensation to employee. The entire concept of employers non
liability is very well illustrated in Employee's Compensation Act, 1923.
Definitions:
Dependent According to section 2(d) of the Employee's Compensation Act 1923, the
word dependent includes the following relatives of a deceased person, such as:
a. a widower
b. a parent apart from widower mother
c. in case no parent of the workman is alive a paternal grandparent
d. a widowed daughter in law.
Dependant also includes some other relations in respect to person partially dependent.
But for an insight we can say that dependent is someone whose source of livelihood
was earning of that deceased workman.
Workman
The term workman includes any person (except those whose employment is of casual
nature or a person who is employed for the sake of employer's business or trade) who
is:
The Act is applicable to all such people who are employed as cook in hotel, liquified
petroleum gas, restaurants using power etc.
In this case the injury is such that it causes disablement of a nature which leads
to incapacity of performing any duty as he could at the time of accident.
1. In case any sort of mental, physical or bodily injury is injury caused to employees
i.e., personal injury takes place.
2. The accident that occurred out of or in the course o9f employment.
3. The injury caused is such that it leads to death, permanent or temporary
disablement or say partial or total disablement of employees.
4. The injury is cause out of employee- employer relationship.
Case law:
In Oriental Fire and General Insurance CO. Limited vs. Sunderbai Ramji[5] case, the
scope of term arising out of employment was determined by Gujarat High Court. In this
case the labourer was performing hard labour which involved physical exertion. One
day labourer after performing his duty for 3 hours felt a pain in chest and fainted on
spot. Later on, when taken to hospital he was declared dead.
Then on observing the case keenly the commissioner found out that it was his duty
which caused him physical discomfort and pain due to which he died and hence he
declared that labourer died due to nature of his job.
Furthermore. The High Court of Gujarat upheld the decision of commissioner that the
injury was caused under the subhead of arising out of employment as specified in
section 3(1) of the Act. It is a personal injury that led to his death and has direct nexus
with employment.
Case law:
In National Iron and Steel Company Ltd. vs. Manorama[6] case, the deceased was a
boy working at a tea stall outside the factory, his duty was to serve tea to the employees
of the factory. One day after serving tea while he was on his way back from the factory,
he crossed a violent mob of workers, police in order to protect themselves shot at the
mob accidently bullet hit the boy and he was killed. The court held that since accident
took place during the working hours and at place of employment hence deceased boy
will be paid compensation.
Case law
In Moondra and Co. vs. Mst. Bhawani[7] case, a truck driver after taking due
permission of the employer went inside the tank of truck to check the source of petrol
leak, he lighted a matchstick inside the tank due to which accident took place and driver
sustained huge burn injuries and eventually died. The court held that since accident
took place at the time and place of work hence dependents of employee were entitled
to compensation.
o If the employee at the time when accident took place is under the
influence of any sort of drugs or drinks due to which he is not in senses or
say right frame of mind.
o If he or she willfully disagrees or disobeys an order mentioned to them or
framed for their safety purpose.
o The willful denial or non-usage of any kind of safety equipment duly
provided to them for the purpose of securing their safety while
working.[8]
Under all the above-mentioned circumstances an employer is not liable to pay any sort
of compensation to employee because he or she is themselves responsible for the
injuries sustained by them as is clear from the conditions mentioned in section 3(1) of
Employee's Compensation Act.
Next ground is that the workman died due to heart attack and, therefore, it is a natural
death and it is not due to an accident arising out of his employment. The term Accident
has no clear meaning in the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
Hence assuming that such injury caused is not arising out of employment employee will
not be entitled to any profit or compensation.
Case Laws:
In case of Devidayal Ralyaram vs. Secretary of State[9], a person appointed at a job
of fitter went under the operating machine to collect scrap in order to make out some
nuts and studs out of it. The machine when set in motion caused permanent injury to
the employ. On analysing the case it was drawn that fitter was prohibited from doing so
and it was not part of his duty to go under the machine and search for scrap. Hence all
the damage or injuries caused to fitter were due to his voluntary actions and there was
no duty imposed on him to do so. Further court held that employer can use doctrine of
added peril as defence for pleading non- liability in case of compensation.
Self-inflicted Injury
If an injury caused to employee is self-inflicted that is, they are themselves responsible
for the cause of the injury whether it may be intentional or accidental in such a case
employer may not be held responsible for payment of compensation. Jobs like Law
enforcement, medical employees, farmers, teachers, salesperson involves a very high
risk of self- inflicted injuries.
Contributory Negligence
It is held that employees also have duty towards employers to perform their task with
utmost care and attention so as to avoid any sort of injury or accident. Although
employers are deemed to be vicariously liable for their employee's negligence but are
entitled to claim a contribution or indemnity from their negligent employee in
appropriate circumstances. However, in case there is negligence on the part of both
employer and employee then the employer is only liable to pay compensation to the
extent of his own negligence but not the employee.
Therefore, the only benefit is that the compensation amount may reduce because the
employer will not be liable to for any sort of negligence committed on the part of
employer.
Section 12(1) of the Act defines employer's liability when contractor is engaged in certain circumstances:
1. When the contractor is involved in any sort of work which is part of the
employer's (principal) work.
2. The employees are involved in the course of employment of work.
3. The accident has occurred at the place where the principal i.e., employer has
undertaken to manage and execute the concerned work.
Amount of Compensation:
Section- 4 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 defines amount of compensation
when Death results from injury- If the employee dies due to any such reason then
amount payable is equal to rupees eighty thousand or fifty percent of the monthly
wages multiplied by a factor as per mentioned in the Schedule 4 of the Act whichever is
more.
When permanent total disablement is caused by injury- If by any chance the employee
faces permanent total disablement due to injury then the amount payable is ninety
thousand rupees or sixty percent provided whichever is more.
When permanent partial disablement is caused by injury- In such a case the amount
payable is ninety thousand rupees or sixty percent of the disablement.
Liability of Insurer
Always remember that liability of insurer is determined on the basis of wages paid to
employees. The insurance policy covers the wages of employees and the insurer is
liable to pay only that part of amount as covered under wages. It is on the part of the
insurer to prove that injury caused is due to occupational disease.
Distribution of Compensation:
Section-8 of the Act talks about rights of heirs of dependents in terms of distribution of compensation
Appeals:
Section-30 of the Act talks about appeals. An appeal can be made in front of High court
by orders of commissioner.
Q. DISCUSS THE HEALTH AND SAFETY MEASURES AS MANDATED BY FACTORIES ACT 1948.
ANS:
Apoorva Neral
ABSTRACT:
Welfare measures means such services, facilities and amenities as may be established in or in the
vicinity of undertakings to enable the persons employed in them to perform their work in healthy,
congenial surroundings and to provide them with amenities conducive to good health and high morale.
After the independence, the Government of India makes strict rules and regulations to safeguard the
interest of the workers in the factories. The present article pertains to the welfare measures provided to
the workers as per the provisions laid down in Chapter 5 (Section 42 to 50) of The Factories Act, 1948
for the benefit of employees of the factories. This article also tries to analyze the effectiveness of these
welfare provisions. It is analytical and descriptive in nature and doctrinal in approach.
INTRODUCTION:
The term ‘Labour Welfare’ refers to the facilities provided to workers in and outside the factory
premises such as canteens, rest and recreation facilities, housing and all other services that contribute
to the wellbeing of workers. Welfare measures are concerned with general wellbeing and efficiency of
workers. In the early stages of industrialization, welfare activities for factory workers did not receive
adequate attention.
Employers were not inclined to accept the financial burden of welfare activities. Wherever employers
provided for such amenities, it was more with a paternalistic approach to labour rather than recognition
of workers’ needs. Hence the state had to intervene, in discharge of its welfare responsibility, by using
its persuasive powers and/or by enforcing legislation, where persuasion failed. Compulsory provisions
are thus incorporated in the Factories Act, 1948 with respect to the health, safety and welfare of workers
engaged in the manufacturing process.
Working conditions of factory workers in India has been historically very pathetic. Due to poverty and
exploitation by factory owners, workers had practically no option. Due to an increase in industrial
activity in the latter half of the 19th century, attempts were made to improve the condition of the workers
many times by the reports of the Royal Commission through various acts. The act of 1948 builds upon
the act of 1934 after understanding the defects and weaknesses of the earlier act. An important change
was the widening the definition of a 'Factory' to include any industrial establishment employing 10 or
more people that uses power, or any industrial establishment that employs more than 20 people that
does not use any power. Other important changes were:
WELFARE MEASURES
The welfare measures involve three major aspects which are - occupational health care, suitable working
time and appropriate salary. It refers to the physical, mental, moral, and emotional well-being of an
individual. The safe work environment provides the basis for the person to enjoy working. The work
should not pose a health hazard for the person. The welfare measures aim at integrating the socio-
psychological needs of employees, the unique requirements of a particular technology, the structure and
processes of the organization and the existing socio-cultural environment. It creates a culture of work
commitment in organizations and society which ensure higher productivity and greater job satisfaction
to the employees. The welfare measures are defined in the same way as defined by the I.L.O. at its
Asian Regional Conference, "A term which is understood to include such services, facilities and
amenities as may be established in or in the vicinity of undertakings to enable the persons employed in
them to perform their work in healthy, congenial surroundings and to provide them with amenities
conducive to good health and high morale."
Due to the welfare measures, the employees feel that the management is interested in taking care of the
employees that result in the sincerity, commitment and loyalty of the employees towards the
organization. The employees work with full enthusiasm and energetic behavior which results in the
increase in production and ultimately the increased profit.
The measures of welfare give result after a long period of time. It is a long process, so the management
has to keep patience while providing the welfare facilities for the employees. While deciding the welfare
facility for the employees, the management has to do discussions with the persons who are now going
to avail the facilities. The communication increases the cohesiveness between the management and the
employees and thus industrial relations improve.
It has been found that the workers, the executives and the management people are all responsible for
the proper implementation of the welfare measures in the organization.1
a) Be painted or varnished, and repainted and revarnished at least once in a period of five years;
where they are painted or varnished, be cleaned at least once in a period of 14 months by such methods
as may be prescribed by the Government.
b) Where painting or varnishing is not required, be kept white washed or colour washed, and the
white washing or colour washing shall be carried out at least once in every period of 14 months.3
(vi) Overcrowding –
No room in any factory shall be overcrowded to such an extent which becomes injurious to the health
of the workers employed therein. The Chief Inspector of factories by order in writing shall fix the
maximum member of workers to be employed in each room in the factory.8
(vii) Lighting –
The Factories Act provides for sufficient and suitable lighting, natural or artificial where workers are
working or passing through. Provision of cleaning of inner and outer surface is provided for all glazed
windows and skylights used for the lighting of the workrooms. In every factory, effective provision
shall be made for the prevention of
a) glare, either directly from a source of light or by reflection from a smooth or polished surface;
b) the formation of shadows to such an extent as to cause eyestrain or the risk of accident to any
worker.9
(x) Spittoons –
Sufficient number of spittoons must be provided in every factory and maintained in clean and hygienic
condition. No person shall spit within the premises of a factory except in the spittoons. A notice
containing this provision and the penalty for its violation shall be prominently displayed at suitable
places in the factory premises.12
They can work only after they have been fully instructed as to the dangers arising in connection with
the machines and the precautions to be observed. They should have received sufficient training in work
at such machines. They should be under adequate supervision by a person who has a thorough
knowledge and experience of the machines.16
ii) Driving belts when not in use, shall not be allowed to rest or ride upon shaft in motion.
In every factory, suitable devices for cutting off power in emergencies from running machinery shall
be provided and maintained in every workroom.17
The State government is authorized to make rules specifying further safeguards to be provided in respect
of any dangerous part of any particular machine or class or description of machines in this connection.19
(vii) Prohibition of Employment of Women and Children near Cotton openers –
No women or child shall be employed in any part of a factory where pressing a cotton–opener is at
work.20
Where in the hoists and lifts used for carrying persons, the cage is supported by rope or chain, there
shall be at least two ropes or chains separately connected with the cage and balance weight, and each
rope or chain with its attachments shall be capable of carrying the whole weight of the cage together
with its maximum load.
Efficient devices shall be provided and maintained capable of supporting the cage together with its
maximum load in the event of breakage of the rope, chain or attachments. An efficient automatic device
shall be provided and maintained to prevent the cage from overrunning.21
In every factory, following safety measures shall be adopted in respect of every lifting machine (other
than a hoist and lift) and every chain, rope and lifting tackle for the purpose of raising or lowering
persons, goods or materials—
a) All parts including the working gear of every lifting machine and every chain, rope or lifting
tackle shall be -
a. of good construction, sound material and adequate strength, and free from defect;
b. properly maintained ; and
c. thoroughly examined by a competent person at least once in every period of twelve months.
b) No lifting machine and no chain, rope, or lifting tackle shall be loaded beyond the safe working
load which shall be plainly marked on it.
c) While any person is employed or working on or near the wheel track of a travelling crane in any
place where he would be liable to be struck by the crane, effective measures shall be taken to ensure
that the crane does not approach within twenty feet of that place.
A lifting machine or a chain, rope or lifting tackle shall be thoroughly examined in order to arrive at a
reliable conclusion as to its safety.22
It was held in Davies v. Havill and Aircraft Co. Ltd.26 that no breach of statutory duty imposed under
this section is occasioned if an injury is caused by accumulation of rain water in little depression in the
concrete of the passage. In Cole v. Blackstone Co. Ltd.27 it was held that the obligation imposed by this
section is not discharged by saying that the occupier has taken all practical steps to ascertain the
goodness and efficiency.
In Finch v. Telegraph Construction and Maintenance Co. Ltd.,31 it was held that hanging of goggles in
the office room is not enough, but the workers must be informed of their whereabouts, only then the
requirements of Sec 35 can be said to have been complied with.
In factories employing more than 500 workers, there shall be an ambulance room. It should contain the
prescribed equipments, and be in the charge of such medical and nursing staff as may be prescribed. 39
(v) Canteens –
In factories employing more than 250 workers, there shall be a canteen for the use of workers. The
government may prescribe the rules in respect of the —
— Food stuff to be served in the canteen;
— Charges to be made;
— Constitution of a managing committee for the canteen; and
— Representation of the workers in the management of the canteen.40
It is true that so far as employer is concerned where the staff canteen has to be provided in pursuance
of this section it must be run on a no profit basis as prescribed by sub-rule (2) of Rule 85. But a
contractor who conducts the canteen not out of any philanthropic considerations but for profit carries
on a trade of keeping a catering establishment, for which he must obtain a licence, if provided under
the relevant statute.41
It was held by the Madras High Court in Elangovan M. and Others v. Madras Refineries Ltd. 42, that the
employees of a canteen run in compliance to statutory duty are workmen of the establishment running
the canteen for the purposes of Factories Act, 1948 only and not for all purposes.
In Haldia Refinery Canteen Employees Union and Another v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Others 43,
the respondent corporation was running a statutory canteen through a contractor. The workmen
employed by the contractor in the canteen claimed regularization in service of the corporation. The
Supreme Court held their claim as not sustainable because the control that the respondent corporation
exercised over the contractor was only to ensure that the canteen was run in efficient manner. Further
the corporation was not reimbursing to the contractor the wages of the workmen. Secondly two
settlements had been made between the contractor and the canteen workmen and the respondent was
not a party to either of them. Therefore, it was held that the workmen in canteen became workers of the
respondent corporation only for the purposes of the Factories Act, 1948 and not for any other purpose.
(vii) Creches –
In every factory, where more than 50 women workers are employed, provision shall be made for suitable
and adequate room for the use of children under the age of six years of such women. Such a room shall
be adequately lighted and ventilated.
It shall be maintained in clean and sanitary conditions under the charge of a woman trained in the care
of children and infants.45
Under what circumstances and subject to what conditions, an employee’s services can be terminated
can well be the subject matter of a contract of employment, because conditions of service would take
in the termination of service and incidentally, the conditions subject to which such termination could
be brought about. That being so a rule imposing on the management obligation to secure the concurrence
of the Labour Commissioner before inflicting the punishment, cannot be said to fall outside Section
49(2) of the Factories Act.48
In Arun Kumar Bali v. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi and Others49, the petitioner was employed as a
Welfare Officer. As per his letter of appointment his services could be terminated by the employer either
by giving two months’ prior notice or by paying two months’ salary in lieu of notice. The service of
petitioner were terminated in terms of his letter of appointment. Feeling aggrieved by his termination
he moved a writ petition. Dismissing the petition the High Court held that the termination of Welfare
Officer’s service in terms of contract of employment could not be challenged as it was a termination
simpliciter in terms of stipulation contained in his letter of appointment.
ANS:
1) Salary
2) Hourly Wage
Hourly wages are a type of wage where employers pay employees for each hour
worked. This type of wage is common for part-time employment and sometimes full-
time employment. Jobs that offer hourly wages include retail, healthcare assistance,
sales, and construction.
3) Commissions
4) Fair Wage
A fair wage is a wage that employers offer their employees. It considers factors like the
cost of living in a particular area and typical wages for a job position. Fair wages usually
act as a midway point between minimum wage and a living wage. Jobs typically receive
fair wages, including housekeepers, virtual assistants, retail sales managers, home
health aides, and tech support specialists.
5) Overtime
Overtime wages are paid to employees for any work they complete that exceeds 40
hours per week. Typically, overtime pay includes double an employee's average
earnings during a 40-hour work week. Examples of jobs that usually offer overtime
include registered nurses, truck drivers, construction workers, tradespeople, EMTs, and
IT specialists.
Useful Read: Time Off in Lieu (TOIL): Balancing Employee Rewards and Work-Life
Harmony
6) Severance Pay
Severance pay refers to the type of wage employers pay to employees they have to let
go. The severance pay an employee receives usually coincides with the years they've
worked at the company. For instance, an employee who worked for a company for
three years would likely get three weeks of severance pay to help their transition.
7) Prevailing Wage
8) Living Wage
Living wage refers to the minimum amount of money an employer can offer an
employee. Living wage is different from minimum wage because employers don't have
to follow legal guidelines like they would if they offered minimum wage to employees.
Examples of jobs that may receive living wages include receptionists, mail carriers, hair
stylists, nannies, and waiters.
9) Minimum Wage
The minimum wage refers to the set hourly rate the U.S. Department of Labor decides
upon. This figure varies depending on the state the individual works in. Jobs that offer
minimum wage include cashiers, grocery store clerks, dishwashers, and daycare
assistants.
10) Bonuses
Bonuses are cash compensation that employers provide to employees for producing
good work. Bonuses don't factor into salaried or hourly earnings and aren't guaranteed
to employees. This type of wage usually acts as an incentive for employees to reach a
certain level of productivity. Jobs that may offer bonuses include salespersons,
marketing specialists, recruitment specialists, and general managers.
Vacation pay is the money employers compensate employees for when they take time
off from work. This type of wage may vary depending on the employee's job position.
For example, a nurse might receive more vacation pay than someone in retail.
Employees eligible to receive vacation pay typically get two weeks of paid leave each
year.
12) Paid time off
Paid time off refers to the money employers pay employees for taking days off from
work when needed. This type of wage is usually provided as an additional benefit to
employees and is paid out in addition to their regular salary or hourly wage. Jobs that
may offer paid time off include nurses, customer service representatives, legal
assistants, teachers, and librarians.
ANS:
The act applies to entire India also includes the state of Jammu and Kashmir.
It favours arbitration over the disputes between employers and workers.
The act paved the way for creating permanent conciliation machinery at various
stages having definite time limits for conciliation and arbitration.
This act emphasis on compulsory adjudication apart from the conciliation and
voluntary arbitration of Industrial Disputes.
Works Committee.
Conciliation Officers.
Board of Conciliation.
Court of Inquiry.
Labour Court.
Industrial Tribunal.
National Tribunal.
Works Committee
To promote measures for securing and preserving good relations between the
employer and the workmen.
To communicate upon subjects of their common interest or concern.
Conciliation Officers
The appropriate government will appoint conciliation officers charged with the
duty of mediating in and promoting the settlement of the industrial disputes.
Those conciliation officers are appointed for a specified area or a specified
industry in a specified area, and his appointment may be permanent or
temporary.
In case of any industrial disputes exist, the conciliation officer should maintain
conciliation proceedings in a prescribed manner without delay to have the right
settlement.
Whether the settlement is reached or not, the conciliation officer has to submit
the report within 14 days of the commencement of the conciliation proceedings
or within the date fixed by the appropriate government.
Board of Conciliation
If no settlement has arrived, the Government may refer the dispute to the labour
court, Industrial Tribunal or National Tribunal.
The time for submission of the report will be extended by the period as agreed
by all the parties to the disputes
The report of the Board should be in the written notice and has to be signed by
all the members of the Board.
The appropriate Government should publish the report submitted within
30days from the receipt
A Board of Conciliation only has the power to bring about a settlement. It has
no authority to impose a settlement on the parties to the dispute.
Courts of Inquiry
A Court will inquire into the request raised to it and report to the appropriate
government within six months from the commencement of the inquiry.
The report of the court will be in the form of a written statement and signed by
all the members of the court.
Members are free to record their dissent. The report submitted will be published
within 30 days of its receipt by the Government.
Labour Courts
The appropriate government will appoint a labour court which consists of one
person with the necessary judicial qualifications and will be appointed by the
appropriate government.
Adjudicate upon the industrial disputes regarding any subject specified in the
Second Schedule.
The appropriate Government will publish it within 30 days from the date of its
receipt.
Industrial Tribunals
Rules of discipline
Rationalisation
National Tribunal
The request should be in written format and also be signed by the presiding
officer of the National Tribunal.
It should publish the request made within a period of 30days from the date of
its receipt by Central Government.
_________________________________________________________________________
ANS:
Judicial Review of Industrial Awards
By Chandnigautam01 | Views 46907
Form of an Award:
Sec.16(2) of the Act simply states that the award of a Labour Court, Tribunal or National,
Tribunal shall be in writing and shall be signed by the presiding officer.
Publication of awards:
The adjudicator shall submit the award to the appropriate Government under section
15 of the I.D Act. The appropriate Government shall then within a period of thirty days
from the date of its receipt publish the award in such manner as the Government thinks
fit. . It is mandatory for the appropriate Government to publish the award, unless it is
prevented from doing so by an order of a Court of competent jurisdiction. The
appropriate Government is duty bound to publish the award, because unless the award
is published it cannot become enforceable under the scheme of the Act. But in public
undertaking government can defer with the period of 30 days for this government. has
to bring a notification into official gazette before the expiry of the 30thday or before
enforceability later after the notification government remains silent , award will
automatically become enforceable after the 90thday from the date of ion of the award.
If the Govt. want to temper with the award and presented the copy of award in the front
of parliament or state legislature , it will become enforceable after 15days of presenting
the copy.
Commencement or Enforceability of an award:
The award which has been published shall become enforceable on the expiry of thirty
days from the date of its publication.
Unless the award becomes enforceable, no rights and liabilities can arise under the
award. In other words, the obligations imposed by the award on the parties shall come
into effect immediately after the expiry of thirty days statutory period from the date of
its publication.
# After the expiry of the period of operation, award will be statutorily binding till this
award is terminated by giving a notice of 2 months by the party to other party or parties
. This notice can be given before the expiry of the operative period or thereafter. Unless
the award is terminated it continues to be binding after the expiry of the period.
# Still after the termination award will be bindings upon the parties till it is replaced by a
new award. The rationale behind this concept is that courts have observed there is
implied consent of both the parties.
Penalty for breach of award:
If any person commits breach of any term of award , he is liable for the punishment.
The punishment provided for is imprisonment which may extend upto 6 months or fine
or both.
Grounds of SLP:
# When there is miscarriage of justice
# When there is flagrant violation of law
# When there is violation of principle of natural justice.
JUSTICE KRISHNAN has asserted that the jurisdiction of Supreme Court regarding SLP is
limitless . This power of Supreme Court is residuary and it is known as the extra
ordinary power of the Supreme Court. Supreme Court of other countries doesn’t have
such power except the Supreme Court of India i.e. power to challenged the decision of
any court be it a tribunal or a court.
Under Article 136 a party can appeal only when the decision is given by a court or by a
tribunal. If the decision given by a body is not a court or a tribunal, party can’t appeal
under article 136.
So now the question arises whether the definition of industrial tribunal and court
comes under the definition of court and tribunal of article 136.
In order to determine the meaning of court and tribunal we have to see HALSBURY LAW
OF ENGLAND ,according to this:
# court is a body created by the state i.e. king or sovereign.
# the body created by state must enjoy entire judicial power of the state
# body must decide the dispute in a judicial manner i.e. procudre which is laid down in
Cooper vs Wilson must be followed.
In order to determine the meaning of tribunal and tribunal we have to see HALSBURY
LAW OF ENGLAND, according to this:
# tribunal is a body created by the state i.e. king or sovereign.
# the tribunal created by state doesn’t enjoy entire judicial power of the state, they have
got trapping of the courts i.e. limited power
# body must decide the dispute in a judicial manner i.e. procudre which is laid down in
Cooper vs Wilson must be followed.
Ultimately, labour courts and tribunal are tribunal within the meaning of article 136 i.e.
they have got limited judicial power within the meanng of article 136.
ANS:
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989), an employer must pay the wages
of an employed person without deductions of any kind except those specified under the Payment of
Wages Act, 1936. A deduction can be made only in the following manner.
It is important to note that the term ‘services‘ does not imply the supply of tools and also the
raw materials required for fulfilling the job.
• Any deduction under the order of the court or any other competent authority
• Payment of premium of the life insurance policy to the Life Insurance Corporation of
India, of the employed person. Further, this requires written authorization from the
person employed.
• Payment of the contribution of the employed person towards any fund that the
employer or the trade union constitutes. This also requires written authorization from
the person employed.
• Payment of the fees for the membership of any trade union registered under the Trade
Union Act, 1926. Also, this requires written authorization from the person employed as
well.
• Recovery of losses which the railway administration sustains on account of the employed
person accepting counterfeit coins or mutilated or forged currency notes.
• If the railway administration sustains losses due to the employed person failing to invoice
or bill or collect or account for the appropriate charges, then the losses are recovered as
deductions.
• Recovery of losses which the railway administration sustains on account of the employed
person incorrectly granting any rebates or refunds
• A contribution that the employed person makes to the Prime Minister’s National Relief
Fund or any similar Fund which is notified in the Official Gazette. Further, this needs
written authorization from the person employed.
• A contribution to an insurance scheme that the Central Government may make for its
employees
Limit on Deductions
As per Section 7(3) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, the total amount of deductions cannot exceed:
1. 75 percent of the wages when the deductions are wholly or partly for payments to
cooperative societies.
ANS:
Keywords:
Principle of Natural Justice, Nemo in propria causa judex, esse debet, Audi alteram partem,
internal investigation, the opportunity of being heard, appropriate disciplinary action.
Governed By:
Domestic enquiry is not considered as a legal requirement under the Industrial Disputes
Act, or other substantive laws such as the Factories act, Mines Act, etc. but has been
provided under the standing orders to be framed in the Industrial Employment (Standing
Order Act) 1946. As a result, it is now well-established that such standing orders have the
force of law and constitute statutory terms of employment
INTRODUCTION
• Domestic Enquiry
Domestic Enquiry is generally applicable for an enquiry into alleged indiscipline and
misconduct. Domestic Enquiry is a universally accepted concept that extends to all court
and enquiry jobs. It is common for disciplinary authorities in a department or industry to
appoint a competent person as an officer or officers to inquire into the allegations against an
employee. They are commonly referred to as “investigations” and are also known as
domestic enquiries.
“No one should be made a judge in his own case, or the rules against bias”
“Hear the other party, or the rule of fair hearing, or the rule that no one should be
condemned unheard.
• Disciplinary Action
Disciplinary action refers to the measures an employer initiates to address and resolve
employee misconduct or performance problems. Steps may be verbal or written warnings,
performance improvement plans, holding wages or salary for a short period, delay in
promotions, suspension, demotion, or termination of employment.
Disciplinary action is a tool in the hands of management to ensure compliance with the rules
and regulations of the organization. It is the source of enforcing the guidelines, rules,
regulations, and code of conduct of employees and dealing with the consequences and penal
provisions for non-compliance.
• Charge-sheet:
If there is enough evidence to support a case and the offence is serious, a charge sheet may
be issued based on the allegations made. The charge sheet must be in writing and include all
imputations of misconduct. It should also specify the time limit within which the charged
employee must submit their explanation.
• Suspension
When it is necessary for disciplinary reasons, a charged worker may be suspended and
entitled to wages during the suspension according to the standing orders.
• Service of charge-sheet
If the workman is present, a charge sheet should be handed over to him in the presence of a
witness after explaining the contents of it in a language known to him.
If the delinquent workman is absent or refuses to accept the charge sheet, it should be sent to
his last address under registered post with acknowledgement due. If he refuses to accept it
or if it comes back undelivered otherwise, the charge- sheet should published in a local
newspaper with wide circulation.
• Explanation
The explanation given by the worker within the given time is considered valid.
• Notice of Enquiry
If the explanation is found unsatisfactory, a notice is served to the worker, the time, place,
and date of the enquiry, along with the name of the enquiry officer.
The enquiry officer must not be the one who has issued the charge sheet because it is a
principle of natural justice that a person should disqualified to act as a judge if he is a party
to the dispute.
• Enquiry
At the appointed time, on the stipulated date and place of the enquiry, it commenced by the
enquiry officer in the presence of a charge-sheeted workman.
At the commencement of the enquiry, the enquiry officer should explain the charge sheet to
the worker. If the charge-sheeted workman pleads innocence, the investigation is necessary
to conduct. If he accepts guilty in writing, the enquiry is not required.
• Fact-findings
On the completion of the enquiry, the enquiry officer should submit his findings to the
authority authorized to take disciplinary action. He should state in his report the charges
accompanied by the explanations. The enquiry officer should not recommend any
punishment in his findings.
• Decision
The higher management, such as the works manager or director, should consider the
investigation findings before taking disciplinary action. If the manager determines an
employee is guilty, they can impose appropriate punishment by standing orders.
• Warning or Alerts:
This is the mildest form of disciplinary action that generally applies to minor offences.
Warnings may be given verbally or in written form. Verbal warnings are used for minor
misconduct, and if they do not produce the desired result, the organization may resort to
written alerts for more severe action.
• Written Notice:
When a warning does not work and if employees continue with the same misconduct, it
becomes necessary to issue a written notice implying a provision for certain punishment.
• Disciplinary Layoffs:
It is initiated in circumstances when an employee does not meet his present job
requirements or standards. When he is lacking in his performance at a workplace, he will
continue at a lower rank than at his present in the organization.
• Fines:
It is the type of punishment in which the fine will deducted from the remuneration or wages
for his misconduct. A penalty is imposed on the employee if he breaks any rule repeatedly.
• Reduction in wages:
When an employee causes any loss or damage to the property in the organization, absent
without permission, taking undue advantages, etc. he is not paid with his entire
remuneration, and the amount of loss or damage will be deducted from his pay. This
approach usually has a demoralizing effect on the employee.
• Withholding increments:
It falls under a little harsh punishment. When an employee faces disciplinary action just
before an annual increment, his annual increment is on hold for a certain period.
• Loss of Privileges:
When an employee commits an offence, such as being late or leaving work without
permission, various privileges can be taken away as a punishment. These privileges may
include good job assignments, the right to choose machines or tools to work with, and the
freedom to move around the workplace or company.
• Punitive Suspension:
The difference between punitive and pending suspensions is that the former is a
punishment for misconduct.
• Termination of services:
When an employee is dismissed, it is usually the result of severe punishment, which is the
final step in disciplinary action.
Q.
• LABOUR
• CENTRAL
• ACT
A | A
•
•
The Act is extends to the whole of India. Further, every industrial establishment
wherein one hundred or more workmen are employed, or were employed on any
day of the preceding twelve months will come under Industrial Employment
(Standing Orders) Act.
1. Within six months from the date on which this Act becomes applicable to
an industrial establishment, employer shall submit to the Certifying Officer
five copies of the draft standing orders proposed by him for adoption in
Form I. It has to be accompanied by a statement giving prescribed
particulars of the workmen employed including the name of the trade
union, if any.
2. The Draft Standing Order shave to cover every matter set out in the Schedule
to the Act and more or less confirm to the Model Standing orders as
prescribed by the Government.
1. Forward a copy to the workers’ trade union and if there is no such trade
union, to the representative of the workmen along with the notice in Form
II requiring their comments and objections, if any, which the workmen may
desire to make to the draft standing orders to be submitted to him within
fifteen days from the receipt of the notice.
2. The Certifying Officer shall certify the draft standing orders, after making
any modifications, and shall within seven days thereafter send copies of the
certified standing orders authenticated along with his to the employer and
to the trade union or other representatives of the workmen.
3. Standing orders shall come into operation on the expiry of thirty days (30
days) from the date on which authenticated copies are sent.
1. Certified Standing Orders shall not be modified until the expiry of six
months from the date on which the standing orders came into operation.
2. An employer or workman or a trade union or other representative body of
the workmen may apply to the Certifying Officer to have the standing orders
modified along with the application accompanied by the five copies of the
modified standing orders and a copy of the agreement between employer
and workmen.
Penalties:
1. Who is employer?
Ans: owner of an industrial establishment to which this Act for the time being
applies, and includes:
1. provision is made for every matter set out in the Schedule of the Act and
2. Standing orders are in conformity with the provisions of this Act.
Q. DISCUSS THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO WORKMENT UNDER PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT.
ANS:
Claims arising out of deductions from wages or delay in Payment of wages and Penalty
for Malicious or Vexatious Claims (2005 amendments)
A person named below will be chosen by the competent government to hear and decide all claims
arising from deductions from wages or delays in payment of wages of persons hired or paid,
including all things ancillary to such claims.
(b) any officer of the Central Government with at least two years' experience performing the
functions of – I Regional Labor Commissioner; or (ii) Assistant Labor Commissioner; or
(c) any officer of the State Government with at least two years' experience performing the functions
of – I Regional Labor Commissioner; or (ii) Assistant Labor Commissioner; or
(d) a presiding officer of any Labor Court or Industrial Tribunal established under the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) or any corresponding law in force in the State relating to the
investigation and settlement of industrial disputes; or
(e) any other officer with experience as a Civil Court Judge or a Judicial Magistrate, as the authority
to hear and decide for any specified area all claims arising out of deductions from wages, or delays
in payment;
If the appropriate government deems it necessary, it may appoint more than one authority for any
given area and provide for the distribution or allotment of work to be undertaken by them under
this Act by general or special order.
Any lawyer, any Inspector under this Act, or an official of a registered trade union authorized to
write an application to the authority appointed by the government for direction of payment of
wages according to this act if any employer does anything contrary to the provisions of this act,
any unreasonable deduction from an employed person's wages has been made, or any payment of
wages has been delayed, in such case any lawyer, any Inspector under this Act, or any official of a
registered trade union authorized to write an application to the authority appointed by
government for direction of payment of wages according to this act.
Any such claim must be submitted within 12 months of the date on which the deduction from
wages was made or the date on which the wages were due to be paid. If there is a good reason,
the time it takes to submit an application can be extended.
Following receipt of the application, the authority will hold a hearing with the applicant and the
employer or other person responsible for wage payment, and if required, will undertake an
investigation.
If an error with the employer is discovered, the authority may compel the employer to pay the
wage or return to the employee the amount deducted unfairly or pay the delayed wages, as well as
pay any other compensation the authority deems appropriate. If there is a fair and genuine basis
for the delay in the payment of wages, the employer will not be liable for any compensation.
If there are numerous employees whose wages have not been paid, there is no need for a large
number of applications. As a result, all employees can submit a single application to the authority
for wage payment under this legislation.
Appeal
Parties who are displeased with the outcome might take their case to the district court.
Punishable with fine which shall not be less than 1000/- rupees but which may extend to
7500/- rupees. If Wage period exceed one month.
• Whoever obstructs an Inspector in the discharge of his duties under this Act
• Whoever refuses or willfully neglects to afford an Inspector any reasonable facility for
making any entry, inspection, examination, supervision, or inquiry authorized by or under
this Act
• Whoever willfully refuses to produce on the demand of an Inspector any register or other
document.
Fines of not less than 1000/- rupees, but not more than 7500/- rupees, may be imposed.
Imprisonment for a period of not less than one month, but not more than six months, and a fine of
not less than 3750 rupees, but not more than 20500 rupees.
• No Court will consider an objection against an individual for an offence under subsection
(1) of section 20 unless an application in regard to the realities establishing the offence has
been displayed under section 15 and has been allowed entirely or partially, and the
authority engaged under the last section of the investigative Court has authorized the
creation of the grievance.
• Before authorizing the creation of a protest against any individual for an offence under
subsection(1) of section 20, the power granted under section 15 or the Appellate Court, all
things considered, will give such individual a chance to show cause why such approval
should not be granted, and the assent will not be granted if such individual fulfills the
position or Court that his default was expected to—
• a bona fide error or bona fide dispute about the amount payable to the employed
individual, or the occurrence of a crisis, or the presence of exceptional circumstances, such
that the individual responsible for wage payment was unable, despite exercising
reasonable persistence, to make prompt payment, or the failure of the employed individual
to apply for or acknowledge payment.
Apart from an objection filed by or with the assent of an Inspector under this Act, no Court lobby
takes notice of a repudiation of section 4 or section 6, or of a negation of any standard established
under section 26.
The Court will consider the amount of any payments already granted against the defendant in any
procedures conducted under section 15 when imposing any fine for an offence under paragraph
(1) of section 20.
Bar of suits
No Court will entertain any suit for the recovery of wages or any deduction from compensation to
the extent that the entirety so guaranteed-
• has shaped the subject of a course under section 15 for the offended party; or
• structures the subject of an application under section 15 which has been displayed by the
offended party and which is pending before the power selected under that section or of
intrigue under section 17; or
• has been decreed, in any proceeding unrelated to the offended party
• could have been recovered by an application under section 15.
ANS:
Dearness Allowance
Dearness allowance is a cost of living adjustment that the Government pays to public sector
employees and pensioners.
It is calculated as a percentage of the basic salary to curb the effect of inflation. As per the
provisions of the Income Tax Act 1961, it is compulsory to declare the tax liability concerning
DA when filing an ITR. This salary component is offered to employees in both India and
Bangladesh.
Dearness Allowance is paid by the Indian government to its employees and pensioners to
neutralise the inflation impact.
Since DA is based on the cost of living, this salary component is not fixed. It varies from one
public sector employee to another based on his/her location. Hence, DA allowance is different
for employees in the rural, urban, and semi-urban sectors.
DA rates are subject to change twice every year. This allowance is increased by the Government
every six months. Usually, the change is introduced on January 1st for the timeframe between
January to the month of June and on July 1st for the period ranging from July to the month of
December.
Now that we understand what is DA in salary, check the different types of dearness allowances
that are offered by the Indian Government:
• Variable Dearness Allowance (VAD)
VAD is a type of DA that is paid to Central Government employees. It undergoes revision every
six months based on the changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) to mitigate inflation.
• Base index
• CPI
The first component of VAD stays fixed until the government increases or decreases the basic
minimum wages. Likewise, the base index also remains fixed for a specific timeframe. However,
the CPI changes every month and thus has an effect on the value of VAD.
This is the allowance that is offered to public sector employees by the Government. IDA is
revised every quarter based on the changes in CPI.
Calculation of DA
Previously referred to as “Dear Food Allowance”, dearness allowance was introduced after the
Second World War. However, after 2006, changes were made in its calculation. It is presently
calculated as a particular percentage of the basic salary.
DA is added to the basic salary along with other components such as House Rent Allowance
(HRA), Conveyance Allowance, and more to form the total salary.
This is how DA in salary is calculated for public sector employees and pensioners:
DA% = [(Average of AICPI (Base Year 2001 = 100) for the last 3 months – 126.33)/126.33] x 100
• Pensioners
Whenever a pay commission introduces a new salary structure, the pension for retired public-
sector employees is revised. When DA increases, the corresponding surge is reflected in the
retired public sector employees’ pensions. This applies to both family and regular pensions.
When pensioners are re-employed, they cannot get DA if it is granted on a fixed pay or time
scale. However, in some other cases, re-employed pensioners may get DA which is limited to
their last drawn pay.
DA is not paid to pensioners if they are residing in a foreign country during re-employment.
Nevertheless, pensioners who reside abroad without being re-employed are eligible for DA on
their pension.
As per the provisions of the Income Tax Act 1961, there is a full incidence of tax on salaried
employees. Suppose a salaried employee gets rent-free accommodation from his or her
employer where all the previously mentioned conditions are met. In that case, DA becomes a
part of the salary, up to which it becomes a retirement benefit salary component.
The Income Tax Act has made it compulsory for individuals to declare their tax
liabilities concerning DA while filing their tax returns.
Q. DISCUSS THE PAYMENT OF BONUS ACT AMENDMEND 2015.
ANS:
The Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Bill, 2015 was passed by the Parliament in the
just concluded Winter Session of the Parliament. The Payment of Bonus (Amendment)
Act, 2015 has been published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary on 1st January,
2016 as Act No. 6 of 2016. The provisions of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act,
2015 shall be deemed to have come into force on the 1st day of April, 2014.
The Government has been receiving representations from trade unions for removal of
all ceilings under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. It is also one of the demands made
by them during the country-wide General Strike held in February, 2013 and September,
2015. As the last revision in these two ceilings were made in the year 2007 and was
made effective from the 1st April, 2006, it was decided by the Government to make
appropriate amendments to the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965.
These changes in the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 will benefit thousands of work force.
Q. STATE THE DEFENSES AVAILABLE TO EMPLOYERS AGAINST EMPLOYEE CLAIMS UNDER EC ACT.
Q.
ypes of Disablement in the Workmen Compensation Act can be classified into –
A) Total disablement
B) Partial disablement
b) Permanent disablement
A) TOTAL DISABLEMENT
For example: If Rahul is a data entry operator and loses his left hand in an accident.
Being a right-handed person, he will be able to perform his task but with a reduction in
his efficiency for his whole life which is termed as partial permanent disablement.
Chart Explanation For Types Of Disablement In Workmen Compensation Act
Furthermore, there is a permanent partial disability chart time for which the
employees are entitled to the number of weeks for permanent partial disability. As a
result, to get the partial loss of use, multiply the percentage of loss by the total
number of weeks assigned for a total loss to determine the number of weeks of
permanent partial disability to which the employee is entitled.
(a) where death results from the injury an amount equal to 3[fifty per cent.]
of the monthly wages of the deceased 1[employee] multiplied by the
relevant factor; or an amount of 4[one lakh and twenty thousand rupees],
whichever is more;
(b) where permanent total disablement results from the injury an amount
equal to 5[sixty per cent.] of the monthly wages of the injured 1[employee]
multiplied by the relevant factor; or an amount of 6[one lakh and forty
thousand rupees],whichever is more:
*****
8
(c) where permanent partial disablement results from the injury. (i) in the
case of an injury specified in Part II of Schedule I, such percentage of the
compensation which would have been payable in the case of permanent
total disablement as is specified therein as being the percentage of the
loss of earning capacity caused by that injury, and (ii) in the case of an
injury not specified in Schedule I, such percentage of the compensation
payable in the case of permanent total disablement as is proportionate to
the loss of earning capacity (as assessed by the qualified medical
practitioner) permanently caused by the injury.
Explanation I.--Where more injuries than one are caused by the same
accident, the amount of compensation payable under this head shall be
aggregated but not so in any case as to exceed the amount which would
have been payable if permanent total disablement had resulted from the
injuries.
Explanation II.--In assessing the loss of earning capacity for the purposes of
sub-clause (ii), the qualified medical practitioner shall have due regard to
the percentages of loss of earning capacity in relation to different injuries
specified in Schedule I;
(d) where temporary disablement, whether total or partial results from the
injury a half-monthly payment of the sum equivalent to twenty-five per cent.
of monthly wages of the 9[employee], to be paid in accordance with the
provisions of sub-section (2).
specify, for the purposes of sub-section (I), such monthly wages in relation
to an employee as it may consider necessary;]
(i) from the date of disablement where such disablement lasts for a period
of twenty-eight days or more, or
(ii) after the expiry of a waiting period of three days from the date of
disablement where such disablement lasts for a period of less than twenty-
eight days; and thereafter half-monthly during the disablement or during a
period of five years, whichever period is shorter:
Provided that--
(a) there shall deducted from any lump sum or half-monthly payments to
which the 9[employee] is entitled the amount of any payment or allowance
which the 9[employee] has received from the employer by way of
compensation during the period of disablement prior to the receipt of such
lump sum or of the first half-monthly payment, as the case may be; and
(b) no half-monthly payment shall in any case exceed the amount, if any, by
which half the amount of the monthly wages of the 9[employee] before the
accident exceeds half the amount of such wages which he is earning after
the accident.
(3) On the ceasing of the disablement before the date on which any half-
monthly payment falls due there shall be payable in respect of that half-
month a sum proportionate to the duration of the disablement in that half-
month.]
[(4) If the injury of the 13[employee] results his death, the employer shall, in
12
Gazette, from time to time, enhance the amount specified in this sub-
section.]