A3 Problem Solving (PDFDrive) w6
A3 Problem Solving (PDFDrive) w6
Quality
A3 PROBLEM SOLVING
An Introduction
Root Cause
A P Check
Value-Added
Theme:
Background
Current Condition
Act
Prepared By:
Target Condition
Date:
CD Planning
Implementation Plan
Action Item Resp Due Date
Cause Analysis
Cost:
Follow-Up
Planned Results Actual Results
Improvement
BILL GIAMBRA
Continuous Improvement
Building a Culture of Excellence
AP
Operational Improvements
Process Owner Development
Team-building
CD
Training
Quality Manager – Fidelity National Information Services
Lean Certification: Toyota sponsored Lean program at the
University of Kentucky.
Applied Lean in Production, Sales, Customer Service, and
Administration functions.
Experience in plastic embossing, plastic injection molding,
fabrication, machining, and assembly industries.
AGENDA
Introduction
Overview of A3 Problem Solving
Using A3 Problem Solving
Conclusion
AGENDA
Introduction
Overview of A3 Problem Solving
Using A3 Problem Solving
Conclusion
THE HOTEL
Elevator company:
“cannot go any faster.”
Fortunately, solution
prevented because REAL
problem discovered:
The guests were bored while
they were waiting.
The manager then gave
his final command:
Find a way to take customers‟
minds off of their waiting.
RAINFOREST CRUNCH
Analysis Results of
ROOT CAUSES PROBLEM SYMPTOMS
Leads to the problem
Analysis Results of
ROOT CAUSES PROBLEM SYMPTOMS
Leads to the problem
Analysis Results of
ROOT CAUSES PROBLEM SYMPTOMS
Leads to the problem
Introduction
Overview of A3 Problem Solving
Using A3 Problem Solving
Conclusion
THE PURPOSE OF A3 PROBLEM SOLVING IS:
Current Condition
Implementation Plan
Action Item Resp Due Date
Cause Analysis
Cost:
Follow-Up
Planned Results Actual Results
Mission:
Prepared By: Date:
a clear and concise Current Condition
Follow-Up
particular cause or
Planned Results Actual Results
solution.
BACKGROUND
Prepared By: Date:
background
information Current Condition
understanding the
extent and
Cause Analysis
Cost:
Follow-Up
importance?
Planned Results Actual Results
Implementation Plan
and delivery
Action Item Resp Due Date
underlying causes of
the problem.
CAUSE ANALYSIS
Prepared By: Date:
Follow-Up
Planned Results Actual Results
TARGET CONDITION
Mission:
Define
Prepared By: Date:
countermeasures to
eliminate root cause(s) Current Condition
represents the
condition we want to Cause Analysis
Cost:
create. Follow-Up
Planned Results Actual Results
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Mission:
Prepared By: Date:
needed to achieve
target condition. Current Condition
Implementation Plan
date.
Cost:
Follow-Up
Planned Results Actual Results
FOLLOW-UP
Mission:
Prepared By: Date:
appropriate
measurements Cause Analysis
Cost:
Follow-Up
Planned Results Actual Results
EXAMPLE
Reducing Change-over time
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
PROBLEM SOLVING TOOLS
Introduction
Overview of A3 Problem Solving
Using A3 Problem Solving
Conclusion
USING A3 PROBLEM SOLVING
An extensive, time-
consuming search was
conducting to find such a
material that was still
cost-effective. None was
found.
FLOW METER
Problem statement
should have been:
“Prevent to flow meter
from leaking.”
Solution: a preventive
maintenance program
that replaced flow meter
on a regular basis
before leaking occurred.
MISSION
When possible,
observe the
process first-hand
and document
your
observations.
BE CAREFUL…
Sometimes, instead of
seeing things the way
they really are, we see
what we expect to see or
what we want to see…
Be careful to observe
things as they are!
WHEN ASSESSING THE CURRENT
CONDITION
Analysis Results of
ROOT CAUSES PROBLEM SYMPTOMS
Leads to the problem
Burst
CURRENT CONDITION – EXAMPLE
USING A3 PROBLEM SOLVING
Identify sources
of waste,
Waste
variation, and
Strain
strain
Variation
ROOT CAUSE QUESTIONS:
Compare metrics
indicated in earlier
stages of the A3 form
as a before and after.
FOLLOW-UP
A3 PROBLEM SOLVING
More Examples
MISSION & BACKGROUND - EXAMPLE
Background
CURRENT CONDITION – EXAMPLE
ROOT CAUSE EXAMPLE
Travelers are not clear enough Too much variation in store packing requirements
Why? – Packer must decipher information on Why? - Packing requirements are not
traveler before knowing what to do. standardized
Why? - Traveler not designed for packing. Consolidation adds non-value added movement
Pick List missed or not available Why? – Packers must move tumblers from new
Why? – Packer missed that Order has Pick List orders aside while finishing another order
Why? - “Combined Order” is an unclear Why? - Packers receive tumblers from one order
reference to pick list before their previous order is completed
Routing guide orders need repacked in the EDI area Why? - Orders are split @ decorating
Why? – They were not packed correctly by the Wrong size Toppers are packed
packer Why? – Topper sizes are too difficult to
Why? – Packer not aware of RG requirements distinguish
Why? – RG indication on traveler does not Why? – They are too small and they look alike
stand out enough.
TARGET CONDITION
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
FOLLOW-UP
As an alternative to listing improvement values, you may
wish to …
FOLLOW-UP
…Show your improvements
Follow-Up graphically
Background
CURRENT CONDITION – EXAMPLE
ROOT CAUSE EXAMPLE
Cause Analysis
TARGET CONDITION
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Implementation Plan
Action Item Resp Due Date
Implement Group Page Bob 2/23
Coordinate with Charge RNs Manager 3/2
Implement Tracking Sheet Jane Doe 3/2
Cheat Sheet Manager 3/2
Cost:
FOLLOW-UP
Follow-Up
Planned Results Actual Results
Patient xsport time 30 min max March, 14.7 minutes
April, 11 minutes
May, 9.15 minutes
MISSION & BACKGROUND - EXAMPLE
Background
CURRENT CONDITION – EXAMPLE
ROOT CAUSE EXAMPLE
Cause Analysis
Transcriptionists take three to four hours a day matching paperwork to specimens.
Why? – They match them manually.
Why? - Paperwork and specimens are not presented in the same order.
Many specimens delayed in until the next day.
Why – Specimens are delivered to the Grossing room @ 6:00 pm which is when that
department closes.
Why - Slides get to pathologist from histology embedding 10:00 am @ the earliest
Why – Histology embedding did not begin until 5:00 am.
Final reports often delayed
Why - Transcription reports to the pathologists previously had a four- to five-hour
turnaround
Many labeling errors occurred causing further delayes
Why - Work processes throughout were inconsistent.
TARGET CONDITION
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Implementation Plan
Action Item Resp Due Date
Modify print order on report IT 2/2/07
Coordinate new Grossing Rm hrs. GR 2/9/07
Coordinate new Histology hrs. HD 2/9/07
Move transcriptionists area TM 2/9/07
Document & Standardize steps PM 2/9/07
Cost:
FOLLOW-UP
Follow-Up
Planned Results Actual Results
Two-day total turnaround All Specs Grossed by 10 pm
Transcription turnaround < 1 hr Average: 47 minutes
Labeling errors: 4/year 1 in first 3 months
AGENDA
Introduction
Overview of A3 Problem Solving
Using A3 Problem
Conclusion
BENEFITS OF THE A3 FORMAT