Benchmark Introduction in IT
Benchmark Introduction in IT
of major enterprises globally have Digital Transformation initiatives underway. However, only 16%
~88% are “thriving”: 40% abandonment.
of Fortune 2000 CEOs surveyed have little or no confidence in their ability to measure Technology
~90% Investment results.
of these CEOs expect their technology leaders (CIOs, CTOs and CDOs) to ensure value realization
~85% from their digital transformation investments – and intend to hold these executives accountable
for the results.
*https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20181113005054/en/Worldwide-Spending-Digital-Transformation-2-Trillion-2022
3
Measuring Technology Investment:
Observations
Measuring Technology Investment Requires a New Set of Metrics
Organizations are struggling to make critical business decisions due to a lack of comparative analytics
and visibility into the effectiveness, adoption pace and business impact of their technology programs.
Is your organization adopting and Is your organization investing in Is your organization recognizing
scaling the right digital capabilities at technology at the right levels and the expected value and returns from
the right pace? on the right capabilities? your technology investments?
5
Managing Technology Investment:
Funding Models are Changing
Multiple Delivery Models within IT = Multiple Financial Responsibilities
As product-oriented delivery drives multiple delivery models (horizontal and
vertical in various combinations), so to the financial responsibilities become more complex.
Product Team
Product Team
Product Team
Product Team
constituencies Business Process
Vertical IT Products: full stack
User Interface consumption and cost (regardless
of delivery model), financial
Horizontals: Management Architecture
management of full stack P&L,
of financials,
Application drives/funds majority of
benchmarking, volume
investment, etc..
leverage for price
Integration Layer
reduction, etc.
Data/Database
Storage
Compute/Platform
Network/Security
7
Investment Needs May Best be Driven by Product, not by Project
IT Products have a lifecycle that require some level of continual investment to support continuous
improvement of the business function. Yet this has implications as well (including labor capitalization challenges).
8
Measuring Technology Spend Holistically
’s IT Business Value Performance Framework Measures
across Multiple Dimensions: Business, Development, and Operational
Development Perspective
10
Financial Model End-State
Business
View
⬤ Performance Requirements driven from business
Enabling Services
objectives
Component Resource Towers (labor, hw, sw, etc.) ⬤ Component costing becomes technology product
Cost Views performance reporting
Finance View
Cost Pools
Business Value: Lines of business have joint
accountability for technology alongside IT – priority
General Ledger (Charts of Accounts) setting and performance. Business value is defined
Cost Model
and tracked as part of a performance framework.
Cost Data
11
Current challenges and opportunities for CI/F/DO
Digital Opportunities
Digitization and Automation
opportunities must be exploited
oning, Organ
ositi iza
Business Value P
tio
Non-Transparency
lls,
n an
Roles, Ski
The Value of the Tech-
CXO Existing systems hinder
d Gov
Dollar needs to be
agility and right-invest,
e
ing
understood and
rn
lack of market insights
an
an
transformed
c
e+
Ch ++
+++
Funding Constraints
Funding needs to come from within
Requiring to optimize legacy
12
What to improve and to communicate is what to benchmark
IT Reporting and Comparative Analysis typically covers all Performance Perspectives
IT Fi
nan
ci
Cost
e
als
Value
alu
Communi Budget
cation
IT V
Agility Volumes
Customer
Services
Satisfaction
Assets Processes
ce
Work-
Projects an
force
r m
e rf o
IT P
13