Connect, Then Lead
Connect, Then Lead
COLLABORATION
Niccolò Machiavelli pondered that timeless conundrum 500 years ago and hedged his bets. “It may
be answered that one should wish to be both,” he acknowledged, “but because it is difficult to unite
them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than loved.”
https://hbr.org/2013/07/connect-then-lead 1/13
3/7/2019 Connect, Then Lead
Now behavioral science is weighing in with research showing that Machiavelli had it partly right:
When we judge others—especially our leaders—we look first at two characteristics: how lovable they
are (their warmth, communion, or trustworthiness) and how fearsome they are (their strength,
agency, or competence). Although there is some disagreement about the proper labels for the traits,
researchers agree that they are the two primary dimensions of social judgment.
Why are these traits so important? Because they answer two critical questions: “What are this
person’s intentions toward me?” and “Is he or she capable of acting on those intentions?” Together,
these assessments underlie our emotional and behavioral reactions to other people, groups, and
even brands and companies. Research by one of us, Amy Cuddy, and colleagues Susan Fiske, of
Princeton, and Peter Glick, of Lawrence University, shows that people judged to be competent but
lacking in warmth often elicit envy in others, an emotion involving both respect and resentment
that cuts both ways. When we respect someone, we want to cooperate or affiliate ourselves with
him or her, but resentment can make that person vulnerable to harsh reprisal (think of disgraced
Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski, whose extravagance made him an unsympathetic public figure). On
the other hand, people judged as warm but incompetent tend to elicit pity, which also involves a
mix of emotions: Compassion moves us to help those we pity, but our lack of respect leads us
ultimately to neglect them (think of workers who become marginalized as they near retirement or of
an employee with outmoded skills in a rapidly evolving industry).
To be sure, we notice plenty of other traits in people, but they’re nowhere near as influential as
warmth and strength. Indeed, insights from the field of psychology show that these two dimensions
account for more than 90% of the variance in our positive or negative impressions we form of the
people around us.
So which is better, being lovable or being strong? Most leaders today tend to emphasize their
strength, competence, and credentials in the workplace, but that is exactly the wrong approach.
Leaders who project strength before establishing trust run the risk of eliciting fear, and along with it
a host of dysfunctional behaviors. Fear can undermine cognitive potential, creativity, and problem
solving, and cause employees to get stuck and even disengage. It’s a “hot” emotion, with long-
lasting effects. It burns into our memory in a way that cooler emotions don’t. Research by Jack
Zenger and Joseph Folkman drives this point home: In a study of 51,836 leaders, only 27 of them
https://hbr.org/2013/07/connect-then-lead 2/13
3/7/2019 Connect, Then Lead
were rated in the bottom quartile in terms of likability and in the top quartile in terms of overall
leadership effectiveness—in other words, the chances that a manager who is strongly disliked will be
considered a good leader are only about one in 2,000.
A growing body of research suggests that the way to influence—and to lead—is to begin with
warmth. Warmth is the conduit of influence: It facilitates trust and the communication and
absorption of ideas. Even a few small nonverbal signals—a nod, a smile, an open gesture—can show
people that you’re pleased to be in their company and attentive to their concerns. Prioritizing
warmth helps you connect immediately with those around you, demonstrating that you hear them,
understand them, and can be trusted by them.
https://hbr.org/2013/07/connect-then-lead 3/13
3/7/2019 Connect, Then Lead
But putting competence first undermines
How Will People React to Your leadership: Without a foundation of trust, people
Style? in the organization may comply outwardly with a
Research by Amy Cuddy, Susan Fiske, and leader’s wishes, but they’re much less likely to
Peter Glick suggests that the way others
conform privately—to adopt the values, culture,
perceive your levels of warmth and
competence determines the emotions and mission of the organization in a sincere,
you’ll elicit and your ability to influence a lasting way. Workplaces lacking in trust often
situation. For example, if you’re highly have a culture of “every employee for himself,” in
competent but show only moderate
warmth, you’ll get people to go along with which people feel that they must be vigilant
you, but you won’t earn their true about protecting their interests. Employees can
engagement and support. And if you show become reluctant to help others because they’re
no warmth, beware of those who may try
unsure of whether their efforts will be
to derail your efforts—and maybe your
career. reciprocated or recognized. The result: Shared
organizational resources fall victim to the tragedy
of the commons.
One study, by Jennifer Lerner, Gary Sherman, Amy Cuddy, and colleagues, brought hundreds of
people participating in Harvard executive-education programs into the lab and compared their
levels of cortisol with the average levels of the general population. The leaders reported less stress
and anxiety than did the general population, and their physiology backed that up: Their cortisol
levels were significantly lower. Moreover, the higher their rank and the more subordinates they
managed, the lower their cortisol level. Why? Most likely because the leaders had a heightened
sense of control—a psychological factor known to have a powerful stress-buffering effect. According
to research by Pranjal Mehta, of the University of Oregon, and Robert Josephs, of the University of
Texas, the most effective leaders, regardless of gender, have a unique physiological profile, with
relatively high testosterone and relatively low cortisol.
Such leaders face troubles without being troubled. Their behavior is not relaxed, but they are
relaxed emotionally. They’re often viewed as “happy warriors,” and the effect of their demeanor on
those around them is compelling. Happy warriors reassure us that whatever challenges we may face,
things will work out in the end. Ann Richards, the former governor of Texas, played the happy
warrior by pairing her assertiveness and authority with a big smile and a quick wit that made it clear
she did not let the rough-and-tumble of politics get her down.
https://hbr.org/2013/07/connect-then-lead 6/13
3/7/2019 Connect, Then Lead
During crises, these are the people who are able to keep that influence conduit open and may even
expand it. Most people hate uncertainty, but they tolerate it much better when they can look to a
leader who they believe has their back and is calm, clearheaded, and courageous. These are the
people we trust. These are the people we listen to.
Bear in mind that the signals we send can be ambiguous—we can see someone’s reaction to our
presence, but we may not be sure exactly what the person is reacting to. We may feel a leader’s
warmth but remain unsure whether it is directed at us; we sense her strength but need reassurance
that it is squarely aimed at the shared challenge we face. And, as we noted earlier, judgments are
often made quickly, on the basis of nonverbal cues. Especially when facing a high-pressure
situation, it is useful for leaders to go through a brief warm-up routine beforehand to get in the right
state of mind, practicing and adopting an attitude that will help them project positive nonverbal
signals. We refer to this approach as “inside-out,” in contrast to the “outside-in” strategy of trying to
consciously execute specific nonverbal behaviors in the moment. Think of the difference between
method acting and classical acting: In method acting, the actor experiences the emotions of the
character and naturally produces an authentic performance, whereas in classical acting, actors learn
to exercise precise control of their nonverbal signals. Generally speaking, an inside-out approach is
more effective.
There are many tactics for projecting warmth and competence, and these can be dialed up or down
as needed. Two of us, John Neffinger and Matt Kohut, work with leaders from many walks of life in
mastering both nonverbal and verbal cues. Let’s look now at some best practices.
https://hbr.org/2013/07/connect-then-lead 7/13
How
3/7/2019
to Project Warmth Connect, Then Lead
Efforts to appear warm and trustworthy by consciously controlling your nonverbal signals can
backfire: All too often, you’ll come off as wooden and inauthentic instead. Here are ways to avoid
that trap.
How you present yourself in workplace sometimes amp up the enthusiasm in their voice,
settings matters a great deal to how you’re increasing their volume and dynamic range to
perceived by others. Even if you’re not convey delight. That can be effective in the right
feeling particularly warm, practicing these
setting, but if those around you have done
approaches and using them in formal and
informal situations can help clear your nothing in particular to earn your adulation,
path to influence. they’ll assume either that you’re faking it or that
Warm you fawn over everyone indiscriminately.
https://hbr.org/2013/07/connect-then-lead 9/13
3/7/2019
Lean inward in a nonaggressive manner Connect, Then Lead
Warmth is not easy to fake, of course, and a polite
to signal interest and engagement.
smile fools no one. To project warmth, you have
to genuinely feel it. A natural smile, for instance,
Place your hands comfortably on your
knees or rest them on the table. involves not only the muscles around the mouth
but also those around the eyes—the crow’s feet.
Strength or competence can be established by virtue of the position you hold, your reputation, and
your actual performance. But your presence, or demeanor, always counts, too. The way you carry
yourself doesn’t establish your skill level, of course, but it is taken as strong evidence of your
attitude—how serious you are and how determined to tackle a challenge—and that is an important
component of overall strength. The trick is to cultivate a demeanor of strength without seeming
menacing.
Feel in command.
Warmth may be harder to fake, but confidence is harder to talk yourself into. Feeling like an
impostor—that you don’t belong in the position you’re in and are going to be “found out”—is very
common. But self-doubt completely undermines your ability to project confidence, enthusiasm, and
passion, the qualities that make up presence. In fact, if you see yourself as an impostor, others will,
too. Feeling in command and confident is about connecting with yourself. And when we are
connected with ourselves, it is much easier to connect with others.
Holding your body in certain ways, as we discussed previously, can help. Although we refer to these
postures as power poses, they don’t increase your dominance over others. They’re about personal
power—your agency and ability to self-regulate. Recent research led by Dacher Keltner, of the
University of California, Berkeley, shows that feeling powerful in this way allows you to shed the
fears and inhibitions that can prevent you from bringing your fullest, most authentic and
enthusiastic self to a high-stakes professional situation, such as a pitch to investors or a speech to an
influential audience.
Stand up straight.
It is hard to overstate the importance of good posture in projecting authority and an intention to be
taken seriously. As Maya Angelou wrote, “Stand up straight and realize who you are, that you tower
over your circumstances.” Good posture does not mean the exaggerated chest-out pose known in
the military as standing at attention, or raising one’s chin up high. It just means reaching your full
height, using your muscles to straighten the S-curve in your spine rather than slouching. It sounds
trivial, but maximizing the physical space your body takes up makes a substantial difference in how
your audience reacts to you, regardless of your height.
Standing tall is an especially good way to project strength because it doesn’t interfere with warmth
in the way that other signals of strength—cutting gestures, a furrowed brow, an elevated chin—often
do. People who instruct their children to stand up straight and smile are on to something: This
simple combination is perhaps the best way to project strength and warmth simultaneously.If you
want to effectively lead others, you have to get the warmth-competence dynamic right. Projecting
both traits at once is difficult, but the two can be mutually reinforcing—and the rewards substantial.
Earning the trust and appreciation of those around you feels good. Feeling in command of a
situation does, too. Doing both lets you influence people more effectively.
The strategies we suggest may seem awkward at first, but they will soon create a positive feedback
loop. Being calm and confident creates space to be warm, open, and appreciative, to choose to act in
ways that reflect and express your values and priorities. Once you establish your warmth, your
strength is received as a welcome reassurance. Your leadership becomes not a threat but a gift.
A version of this article appeared in the July–August 2013 issue of Harvard Business Review.
Amy J.C. Cuddy is an Associate Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School.
Amy J.C. Cuddy is an associate professor of business administration at Harvard Business School. Matthew Kohut and John
Neffinger are the authors of Compelling People: The Hidden Qualities That Make Us Influential (Hudson Street Press, August
2013) and principals at KNP Communications.
John Neffinger are the authors of Compelling People: The Hidden Qualities That Make Us Influential (Hudson Street
Press, August 2013) and principals at KNP Communications.
https://hbr.org/2013/07/connect-then-lead 12/13
3/7/2019 Connect, Then Lead
Comments
Leave a Comment
POST
8 COMMENTS
REPLY 0 0
POSTING GUIDELINES
We hope the conversations that take place on HBR.org will be energetic, constructive, and thought-provoking. To comment, readers must sign in or
register. And to ensure the quality of the discussion, our moderating team will review all comments and may edit them for clarity, length, and relevance.
Comments that are overly promotional, mean-spirited, or off-topic may be deleted per the moderators' judgment. All postings become the property of
Harvard Business Publishing.
https://hbr.org/2013/07/connect-then-lead 13/13