Scribd
Upload
14 views

Demo Stat

statistics

Uploaded by

Norideth Ramos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
14 views

Demo Stat

statistics

Uploaded by

Norideth Ramos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25

TO SET UP DESKTOP OR LAPTOP USING EXCEL, FOLLOW THE FO

1. PRESS OFFICE BOTTON OR FILE


2. EXCEL OPTIONS
3. ADD-INNS ( LOCATED AT THE LEFT SIDE )
4. ANALYSIS TOOL PAK
5. GO (AT THE BOTTOM)
6. CHECK ANALYSIS TOOLPAK AND ANALYSIS TOOL PAK VBA
7. PRESS OK
8. CLICK DATA(POSTED AT THE RIGHT) "DATA ANALYSIS"
OLLOW THE FOLLOWING STEPS:

OOL PAK VBA

NALYSIS"
VARIABLES FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

SEX

MALE 25

FEMALE 10

TOTAL 35

ACAD.PER.

96-100 1

91-95 14

88-90 16

81-86 4

TOTAL 35
N= total frequency( respondents)

p= f/N X 100

25 71

10 29

35 100

1 3

14 40

16 46

4 11

35 100
De vega LIM

A B
1 79 83
2 87 90
3 88 92
4 92 84
5 85 85
6 86 93
7 93 85
8 83 85
9 78 83
10 95 86
No. of hours
studied Academic performance
1 8 82
2 11 94
3 3 70
4 6 75
5 14 98
6 9 80
7 2 68
8 0 65
9 7 76
10 13 87
11 10 87
12 4 83
13 9 72
level of relationship
Pearson’s r
Legend :
Range Interpretation
± 0.00 to ± 0.10 No Correlation
± 0.11 to ± 0.25 Negligible Correlation
± 0.26 to ± 0.50 Moderate Correlation
± 0.51 to ± 0.75 High Correlation
± 0.76 to ± 0.99 Very High Correlation
±1 Perfect Correlation
No. of hours studied Academic performance No. of hours studied
8 82 No. of hour 1
11 94 Academic 0.85
3 70
6 75
14 98
9 80
2 68
0 65
7 76
13 87
10 87
4 83
9 72
Academic performance
0.847162291293893
1
x y

No. of hours
studied Academic performance
1 8 82
2 11 94
3 3 70
4 6 75
5 14 98
6 9 80
7 2 68
8 0 65
9 7 76
10 13 87
11 10 87
12 4 83
13 9 72
REGRESSION

Null Hypothesis: Ho p-value


There is no significant relationship between
the no. of hours spent studying
and the performance of the students
0.05 alpha level interpretation Ho
p between result is equal or less than 0.05 reject
result is greater than 0.05 accept
Verbal interpretation
significant
not significant
Null Hypothesis:
Pretest Posttest there is no significant difference between pretest and po
1 6 12
2 9 13
3 11 13 t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
4 12 14
5 5 8
6 7 11
7 10 13
8 8 10
9 4 7
10 9 12
DEPENDENT T-TEST

o significant difference between pretest and posttest in Stat & prob. of G11 Makakalikasan
LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 0.05 …...REJECT THE NULL HYPOTHESIS ..AND THE RESULT I
GREATER THAN 0.05 …...ACCEPT…IS NOT SIGNIFICANT
ired Two Sample for Means
THESIS ..AND THE RESULT IS SIGNIFICANT
MASINOP MAKAKALIKASAN
1 23 25
2 18 21
3 19 16
4 21 19
5 24 26
6 27 23
7 23 20
8 19 21
9 25 27
10 22 21
INDEPENDENT T-TEST
Null Hypothesis:
there is no significant difference between G11 masinop a
LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO
GREATER THAN 0.05 …...

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances


een G11 masinop and g11 Makakalikasan in Stat & prob. of G11 Makakalikasan with respect to
LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 0.05 …...REJECT THE NULL HYPOTHESIS ..AND THE RESULT IS SIGNIFICANT
GREATER THAN 0.05 …...ACCEPT…IS NOT SIGNIFICANT
asan with respect to game strategy
individual work: find out if the two variables are
AP MEAN(CAP)
1 90 3.7 null hypothesis (Ho)
2 87 3.5 there is no significant relationship between the
3 79 2.5
4 80 2.8 SUMMARY OUTPUT
5 85 3
6 93 4
7 91 3.8
8 88 3.6
9 87 3.5
10 83 2.9
10 83 2.9
dual work: find out if the two variables are correlated , and find the level of significance

ypothesis (Ho)
is no significant relationship between the academic performance and the level of ATHLETIC PARTICIPATION OF TAYTAY SENIOR HIGH

MARY OUTPUT
TION OF TAYTAY SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETE STUDENT
No. of hours s performance grade
8 82
11 94
3 70
6 75
14 98
9 80
2 68
0 65
7 76
13 87
10 87
4 83
9 72 25
mkk mcnp
79 83
87 90
88 92
92 84
85 85
86 93
93 85
83 85
78 83
95 86

You might also like