IET Power Electronics - 2022 - Zhang - Single Phase Small Capacitor Motor Drive System With High Efficiency Buck Active
IET Power Electronics - 2022 - Zhang - Single Phase Small Capacitor Motor Drive System With High Efficiency Buck Active
DOI: 10.1049/pel2.12264
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
© 2022 The Authors. IET Power Electronics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Institution of Engineering and Technology.
2 PROPOSED CIRCUIT AND FIGURE 3 SC motor drive system based on proposed APDC
OPERATION THEORY
2.1 Power characteristic analysis of motor APDC, and a motor inverter. The Boost converter is used
drive systems to achieve unity PF, and the motor inverter is used to con-
trol the motor. The proposed APDC is used to deal with
Supposed that the PF of motor drive systems is unity, the input the grid ripple power and suppresses the voltage ripple
power of motor drive systems can be described by: on the DC-link. This APDC is composed of S2 , Cd and
Co , Ld , and D2 . Cd and Co are small film capacitors. Cd
pg = 2Ug Ig sin2 (𝜔t ) and Ld act as power decoupling components, which are
used to buffer the grid pulsating power. Co is the DC-link
= PM + Pc = Pg − Pg cos(2𝜔t ) (1) capacitor.
⏟⏟⏟ ⏟⎴⎴⏟⎴⎴⏟ It can be known form Figure 3 that the bulky DC-link
PM pr
capacitor in the conventional Boost converter is replaced by
where Ug and Ig are the RMS values of the grid voltage and the proposed APDC. The output capacitor of Boost con-
current, respectively. ω is the radian frequency of the grid. PM verter is composed of Cd and Co connected in series, which
is the motor power. pg , Pg , and pr are the input instantaneous is denoted as CBO . The output voltage of Boost converter is
power, average power, and pulsating power of motor drive sys- named as uBO , which is composed of ud and uo connected in
tems, respectively. series.
(1) Shows that pg consists of the DC component Pg and the
AC component pr with 2ω. If the grid ripple power pr are all
absorbed by the power decoupling unit (such as bulky E-caps), 2.3 Suppression mechanism of DC-link
Pg equals PM and there is no voltage ripple on the DC-link, voltage ripple
which means the motor has no speed ripple and torque ripple, as
shown in Figure 2. In contrast, the voltage ripple will increase It is well known that the output voltage of Boost converter can
significantly when a small F-cap replaces bulky E-caps, which be expressed as [26]:
will inevitably degrade the motor performance.
PM
uBO ≈ UBO + sin(2𝜔t ) (2)
2.2 Structure of the proposed APDC 2𝜔CBOUBO
Figure 3 shows the structure of the SC motor drive system, (2) shows that uBO is composed of the DC component and
which mainly consists of a Boost converter, the proposed the 2ω AC component, and can also be regarded as a series
17554543, 2022, 8, Downloaded from https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/pel2.12264 by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [02/07/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
ZHANG ET AL. 741
S1 ON OFF
DC-link Δu > 𝜁 Δu < −𝜁 Δu > 𝜁 Δu < −𝜁
S2 ON OFF OFF ON
STATE 1 2 3 4
ever, the ripple voltage of uBO is much larger than that of the uo
and significantly increases with the increase of the motor power.
The voltage ripple of the uo only slightly increases when the
FIGURE 4 The voltage characteristics of the proposed SC motor drive motor power increases, which means that the proposed APDC
system can effectively suppress the voltage ripple on the DC-link.
3 CONTROLLER DESIGN
Uo Uo
d2 = = PM
(7)
uBO UBO + sin(2𝜔t )
2𝜔CBOUBO
PM 1
= Cd Ud ΔUd (9)
𝜔 2
where T is the switching period of S2 , and ΔId is the Ld rip- TABLE 2 Key parameters of the proposed circuit
ple current. (7) shows that d2 varies with uBO . According to the Parameters Value
operating conditions of the proposed APDC, the maximum and
Ug 220V
minimum duty of S2 are shown as:
ω 314 rad/s
Uo Power switching frequency 20 kHz
⎧d2. min = = 0.5
⎪ UBO + 0.5Ud Cd and Co 40 μF/40 μF
⎨ (14)
⎪d Uo L1 and Ld 3 mH/1 mH
⎩ 2. max = UBO − 0.5Ud
= 0.75
UBO and UO 500/300
FIGURE 11 Simulation results of the proposed SC motor drive system. (a) Speed change condition, (b) load change condition. Top to bottom: The motor
speed, the output voltage of Boost converter uBO , the voltage of decoupling capacitor ud , the DC-link voltage Uo , the grid current ig and the grid voltage ug
17554543, 2022, 8, Downloaded from https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/pel2.12264 by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [02/07/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
746 ZHANG ET AL.
FIGURE 15 Continued
tional motor drive system. Figure 17a shows that this motor
drive system has a speed drop of 70 rpm and a duration of
200 ms due to a 110 V voltage drop. In the proposed SC motor
drive system, it can be seen from Figure 17b there is only very
little voltage drop on the DC-link when the load step-up hap-
pens, which causes a speed drop of 30 rpm and a duration of
200 ms.
The dynamic experimental waveforms show the proposed
SC motor drive system has better performance than that of the
conventional motor drive system based on front-end Buck con-
verter due to small overshoot voltage on the DC-link. The rea-
son is that the DC-link voltage is controlled by the PI controller
in the conventional motor drive system, where there is a delay
due to the integrator. In contrast, the DC-link voltage is con-
trolled by instantaneous voltage control in the proposed APDC.
It can be seen from Figures 16b and 17b when the given speed
or load changes, the peak-peak voltage of the Boost converter
output port increases, which is similar to the DC-link voltage
of existing APDCs. Fortunately, the decoupling capacitor has
the same peak-peak voltage as the output voltage of the Boost
converter by adopting the proposed APDC and the instanta-
neous voltage control. According to the operation theory of the
proposed APDC, the voltage ripples of uBO and ud cancel each
other out, so there is a small voltage drop on the DC-link. Mean-
while, it can be seen the current of Ld increases during the tran-
sient period, which can avoid the DC-link voltage drop.
FIGURE 16 Speed step-up experimental waveforms of the proposed SC
motor drive system. (a) Grid current ig , DC-link voltage uo , motor torque TM
and motor speed of the conventional motor drive system based on front-end
5.3 Comparative study Buck converter. (b) Grid current ig , DC-link voltage uo , motor torque TM and
motor speed of the proposed SC motor drive system; (c) boost converter
To further verify the validity, the main indexes of the proposed output voltage uBO , decoupling capacitor ud , DC-link voltage uo , and the
APDC are compared with the traditional Buck converter with a current of inductor Ld of the proposed SC motor drive system
bulky electrolytic capacitor, such as power density, system effi-
ciency. In the Buck converter, one 680 μF electrolytic capacitor electrolytic capacitor and film capacitors. The ESR of 40 μF film
is adopted to obtain the same voltage ripple on the DC-link as capacitors is 2.3 mΩ, which is much lower than the 95 mΩ ESR
the proposed APDC, which is more than ten times the capacitor of 680 μF electrolytic capacitors. The power loss of capacitor is
in the proposed APDC. expressed as:
In the two compared converters, the power loss of capaci-
tors is most worthy of study due to the large difference between Ploss = IC2 ESR (17)
17554543, 2022, 8, Downloaded from https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/pel2.12264 by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [02/07/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
ZHANG ET AL. 749
d uC d (A sin(2𝜔t ))
iC = C =C
dt dt
√ (18)
= 2𝜔AC cos(2𝜔t ) = 2IC cos(2𝜔t )
TABLE 7 Comparison of key devices between the proposed APDC and the conventional buck converter
Peak-peak voltage
APDCs Rating power Passive Components Power devices Efficiency Steady/dynamic state
calculated as: is 93.8% and 93%, respectively. The lowest efficiency occurs at
100 W load, which is 91.2% and 90%, respectively. The max-
Ploss−DCM = PS2 +PD2 imum conversion efficiencies from UBO to Uo are 96.5% and
95.9% at 300 W load. The minimum efficiency is 95.1% and
iLd .peak (UCES + UF ) 94.4% at 100 W load. Under the same load level, the efficiency
= ILd UCES + IL UF = (19)
d 8 is 95.3% and 92.2% in the Buck converter, respectively. It is
obvious that the proposed APDC degrades the efficiency of
where ILd is the RMS current of Ld , and UCES and UF are the the front-end converter due to an additional power flow path
on-state voltage of S2 and the forward voltage of D2 , respec- and more power components. However, when the proposed
tively. When the proposed APDC operates at CCM, the total APDC works at DCM, the efficiency drop of the front-end
power loss of S2 and D2 is expressed as: converter is relatively small compared with the traditional sys-
tem. In addition, SC motor drive systems based on the pro-
Ploss−CCM = PS2 +PD2
posed APDCs are more reliable and have a longer lifespan than
iLd .peak (UCES + UF ) motor drive systems based on Buck converter. These advan-
= ILd UCES + IL UF = (20) tages of the proposed APDC show that SC motor drive systems
d 4
can gradually replace traditional motor drive systems with bulky
Table 6 lists the power loss of power switches with two E-Caps.
operating modes at full load. Figure 18 shows the effi- Table 7 compares the cost and volume of key devices of two
ciency curve, where the load varies from 100 to 400 W. To converters. Due to smaller sizes, the volumes of S2 and D2 are
get accurate efficiency, the motor is replaced by the fixed not listed. In Buck converter, a 1 mH inductor and a 3.3-μF
resistance. capacitor are used as input filter, and the output inductor is
In DCM and CCM, the front-end converter with the pro- also 1 mH. This table shows the cost of the proposed circuit is
posed APDC has the maximum efficiency at 300 W load, which reduced by 25.8% and the volume is reduced by 41.4%. Overall,
17554543, 2022, 8, Downloaded from https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/pel2.12264 by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [02/07/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
ZHANG ET AL. 751
the proposed SC motor drive is competitive with comprehen- 7. Lee, W., Son, Y., Ha, J.: Single-phase active power filtering method
sive consideration of cost, volume, and lifespan. using diode-rectifier-fed motor drive. In: 2013 IEEE Energy Conversion
Congress and Exposition, Denver, CO, pp. 2461–2465 (2013)
Table 8 compares the key parameters in different APDCs,
8. Kjaer, S.B., Pedersen, J.K., Blaabjerg, F.: A review of single-phase grid-
which shows all APDCs can effectively suppress the voltage connected inverters for photovoltaic modules. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 41,
pulsation under steady working conditions. But, the proposed 1292–1306 (2005)
APDC has the lowest voltage drop under dynamic working con- 9. Su, M., Pan, P., Long, X., Sun, Y., Yang, J.: An active power-decoupling
ditions and has the highest efficiency. In addition, the proposed method for single-phase AC–DC converters. IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat.
10, 461–468 (2014)
APDC has only two power devices, which is the least among all
10. Cao, X., Zhong, Q., Ming, W.: Ripple eliminator to smooth DC-Bus voltage
circuits. Overall, the proposed APDC can be competitive by a and reduce the total capacitance required. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62,
comprehensive consideration of efficiency, cost, peak-peak volt- 2224–2235 (2015)
age, and voltage drop. 11. Shin, H., Chae, Y., Son, Y., Ha, J.: Single-phase grid-connected motor
drive system with DC-link shunt compensator and small DC-link capac-
itor. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 32, 1268–1278 (2017)
12. Ren, C., Han, X., Wang, L., Yang, Y., Qin, W., Wang, P.: High-performance
6 CONCLUSION three-phase PWM converter with a reduced DC-link capacitor under
unbalanced AC voltage conditions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 65, 1041–
A high-efficiency Buck APDC has been proposed here. This 1050 (2018)
13. Wang, R., Wang, F., Boroyevich, D., Ning, P.: A high power density single
APDC has two power paths between the Boost PFC and the
phase PWM rectifier with active ripple energy storage. In: Annual IEEE
DC-link, which can more flexibly handle the grid pulsating Conference on Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition
power. Meanwhile, a novel instantaneous voltage controller is (APEC), Palm Springs, CA, pp. 1378–1383 (2010)
proposed to quickly suppress the DC-link voltage ripple. There- 14. Tang, Y., Blaabjerg, F., Loh, P.C., Jin, C., Wang, P.: Decoupling of fluc-
fore, the SC motor drive system has a lower DC-link voltage tuating power in single-phase systems through a symmetrical half-bridge
circuit. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 30, 1855–1865 (2015)
ripple and good motor performance under steady and dynamic
15. Camponogara, D., Vargas, D.R., Dalla Costa, M.A., Alonso, J.M., Garcia,
working conditions. Compared with the conventional APDCs, J., Marchesan, T.: Capacitance reduction with an optimized converter con-
the proposed APDC has higher efficiency due to DCM, which nection applied to LED drivers. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62, 184–192
is important for SC motor drive systems. The prototype exper- (2015)
iments showed that the proposed APDC and control method 16. Yao, W., Loh, P.C., Tang, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Blaabjerg, F.: A robust
DC-split-capacitor power decoupling scheme for single-phase converter.
is effective under steady-state and dynamic working conditions,
IEEE Trans Power Electron. 32, 8419–8433 (2017)
and the PF and THD of the SC motor drive system based on the 17. Tang, Y., Qin, Z., Blaabjerg, F., Loh, P.C.: A dual voltage control strategy
proposed APDC can satisfy the requirement of IEC61000-3-2. for single-phase PWM converters with power decoupling function. IEEE
Trans Power Electron. 30, 7060–7071 (2015)
18. Tang, Y., Zhu, D., Jin, C., Wang, P., Blaabjerg, F.: A three-level quasi-
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
two-stage single-phase PFC converter with flexible output voltage and
None improved conversion efficiency. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 30, 717–726
(2015)
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 19. Lu, W., Lu, X., Han, J., Zhao, Z., Du, X.: Online estimation of ESR for DC-
link capacitor of boost PFC converter using wavelet transform based time–
The data that support the findings of this study are available
frequency analysis method. IEEE Trans. Power Electron 35(8), 7755–7764
from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. (2020)
20. Xie, S., Sun, Y., Lin, J.h., Li, X., Yonglu, M.S., Xiong, W.J.: Adaptive power
ORCID decoupling control for single-phase converter with unbalanced DC-split-
Chao Zhang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-6826 capacitor circuit. IEEE Trans. Power Electron 36, 12127–12136 (2021)
21. Abdelmessih, G.Z., Alonso, J.M., d S Spode, N., Costa, M.A.D.: High-
efficient electrolytic-capacitor-less offline LED driver with reduced power
REFERENCES processing. IEEE Trans. Power Electron 37, 1804–1815 (2021)
1. IEC 61000-3-2:2020 ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY 22. Cai, W., Jiang, L., Liu, B. S., Duan, Zou, C.: A power decoupling method
(EMC) – Part 3-2: Limits – Limits for harmonic current emissions based on four-switch three-port DC/DC/AC converter in DC microgrid.
(equipment input current ≤ 16 A per phase) 2013 IEEE ECCE 4678–4682 (2013)
2. Wang, H., Blaabjerg, F.: Reliability of capacitors for DC-link applications 23. Shimizu, T., Fujita, T., Kimura, G., Hirose, J.: A unity power factor PWM
in power electronic converters—An overview. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl 50, rectifier with DC ripple compensation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 44,
3569–3578 (2014) 447–455 (1997)
3. Krein, P.T., Balog, R.S., Mirjafari, M.: Minimum energy and capacitance 24. Liu, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, H., Dan, H., Su, M., Pan, X.: Peak and valley cur-
requirements for single-phase inverters and rectifiers using a ripple port. rent control for CUK PFC converter to reduce capacitance. IEEE Trans.
IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 27, 4690–4698 (2012) Power Electron. 37, 313–321 (2022)
4. Maddula, S.K., Balda, J.C.: Lifetime of electrolytic capacitors in regenera- 25. Ohnuma, Y., Itoh, J.: A novel single-phase buck PFC AC–DC converter
tive induction motor drives. In: 2005 IEEE 36th Power Electronics Spe- with power decoupling capability using an active buffer. IEEE Trans. Ind.
cialist Conference, Dresden, Germany, pp. 153–159 (2005) Electron. 50, 1905–1914 (2014)
5. Son, Y., Ha, J.: Direct power control of a three-phase inverter for grid 26. Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Lin, J., Su, M., Liang, X.: Active power decoupling con-
input current shaping of a single-phase diode rectifier with a small DC- trol for single-phase current source rectifier based on emulating LC res-
link capacitor. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 30, 3794–3803 (2015) onator. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron 68, 5460–5465 (2021)
6. Zhao, N., Wang, G., Xu, D., Xiao, D.: An active damping control method 27. Li, S., Qi, W., Tan, S., Hui, S.Y.R.: A single-stage two-switch PFC rectifier
for reduced DC-link capacitance IPMSM drives. IEEE Trans. Ind. Elec- with wide output voltage range and automatic AC ripple power decoupling.
tron. 65, 2057–2068 (2018) IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 32, 6971–6982 (2017)
17554543, 2022, 8, Downloaded from https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/pel2.12264 by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [02/07/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
752 ZHANG ET AL.
28. Liu, Y., Sun, Y., Su, M., Zhou, M., Zhu, Q., Li, X.: A single-phase PFC rec-
tifier with wide output voltage and low-frequency ripple power decoupling. How to cite this article: Zhang, C., Xu, L., Zhu, X.,
IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 33, 5076–5086 (2018)
Du, Y., Quan, L.: Single-phase small capacitor motor
29. Liu, W., Wang, K., Chung, H.S., Chuang, S.T.: Modeling and design of series
voltage compensator for reduction of DC-link capacitance in grid-tie solar drive system with high-efficiency buck active power
inverter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 30, 2534–2548 (2015) decoupling converter. IET Power Electron. 15, 738–752
30. Wang, H., Chung, H.S., Liu, W.: Use of a series voltage compensator for (2022). https://doi.org/10.1049/pel2.12264
reduction of the DC-link capacitance in a capacitor-supported system.
IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 29, 1163–1175 (2014)
31. Zhang, C., Xu, L., Zhu, X., Du, Y., Quan, L.: Elimination of DC-link
voltage ripple in PMSM drives with a DC-split-capacitor converter. IEEE
Trans. Power Electron. 36, 8141–8154 (2021)