Lecture06 ch23 2
Lecture06 ch23 2
Calculate Electric Potential of a System (if 𝐸𝐸�⃗ can be found readily, e.g. using Gauss’s law)
𝑏𝑏 𝑎𝑎
𝑉𝑉𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 ≡ 𝑉𝑉𝑎𝑎 − 𝑉𝑉𝑏𝑏 = � �𝑬𝑬⃗ ⋅ 𝑑𝑑𝒍𝒍⃗ = − � �𝑬𝑬⃗ ⋅ 𝑑𝑑𝒍𝒍⃗
𝑎𝑎 𝑏𝑏
Consequences:
1. Lightning rods have round shape at the tip
2. The larger the metal sphere in a van de Graaff generator, the higher 𝑉𝑉 it can build up
Demonstration:
cannot choose 𝑉𝑉(∞) = 0, true in cases where charge distribution extends to infinity
If choose 𝑉𝑉(𝑅𝑅) = 0 (on the cylinder surface) instead
𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟
𝜆𝜆 𝜆𝜆 𝑅𝑅
𝑉𝑉(𝑟𝑟) = − � 𝑬𝑬 �⃗ ⋅ 𝑑𝑑𝒍𝒍⃗ = − � 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 = ln < 0
𝑅𝑅 𝑅𝑅 2𝜋𝜋𝜖𝜖0 𝑟𝑟 2𝜋𝜋𝜖𝜖0 𝑟𝑟
𝑏𝑏
��⃗ ⋅ 𝑑𝑑𝒍𝒍⃗ to calculate 𝑉𝑉 because 𝐸𝐸 can be found easily using
In the above examples, 𝑉𝑉𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 = ∫𝑎𝑎 𝑬𝑬
1 𝑞𝑞
Gauss’s law. Otherwise we go back to 4𝜋𝜋𝜖𝜖 ∑ 𝑟𝑟 𝑖𝑖 , assuming 𝑉𝑉(∞) = 0.
0 𝑖𝑖
Question: does this result make sense for an infinitely long line, 𝑎𝑎 → ∞?
Conductor Revisited
Consider a conductor of arbitrary shape, which may have a cavity inside. It may carry a surplus
charge, but there is no free charge inside the cavity. It is assumed to be in electrostatic condition
(no net current).
We already know from studying ��⃗ 𝑬𝑬 that
1. Inside the solid conductor (not including the cavity), �𝑬𝑬⃗ = 0
�⃗ perpendicular to surface
2. On the conductor surfaces (inner and outer), 𝑬𝑬
To prove it:
1. Any two points a and b on the surfaces (both inside and outside), 𝐸𝐸∥ = 0, potential difference
between them 𝑉𝑉𝑎𝑎 − 𝑉𝑉𝑏𝑏 = ∫ 𝐸𝐸∥ 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 = 0
�⃗ ⋅ 𝑑𝑑𝒍𝒍⃗ = 0
2. Any two points inside the conductor (not including the cavity), 𝑉𝑉𝑎𝑎 − 𝑉𝑉𝑏𝑏 = ∫ 𝑬𝑬
already seen points 1 and 2 in a metal sphere
3. Inside the cavity, prove by contradiction:
- Inner surface A is equipotential, 𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴
- Assume a point P inside the cavity has different
potential 𝑽𝑽𝑷𝑷 ≠ 𝑽𝑽𝑨𝑨 . Construct an equipotential
surface B through P
- B cannot touch surface A (why?)
- Anywhere between A and B, �𝑬𝑬⃗ must point either from
A to B if 𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴 > 𝑉𝑉𝐵𝐵 , or B to A if 𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴 < 𝑉𝑉𝐵𝐵
- Construct a Gaussian surface sitting between surfaces
A and B. It has non-zero flux but encloses no charge,
a contradiction!!
Therefore
𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕
��⃗
𝑬𝑬 = − � 𝒊𝒊̂ + 𝒋𝒋⃗ + �𝒌𝒌⃗� ≡ −∇𝑉𝑉
𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕
𝜕𝜕 𝜕𝜕 𝜕𝜕
∇≡ 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕 𝒊𝒊̂ + 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕 𝒋𝒋⃗ + 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕 �𝒌𝒌⃗ is called the gradient operator, or grad
∇𝑉𝑉 (a vector !!) is called the potential gradient, i.e., the rate of change of 𝑉𝑉
already know that 𝐸𝐸 stronger in places where equipotential surfaces are closer
Question: Suppose 𝑉𝑉(𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧) = 𝐴𝐴 + 𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 + 𝐶𝐶𝑦𝑦 3 + 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷, where 𝐴𝐴, 𝐵𝐵, 𝐶𝐶 and 𝐷𝐷 are positive
constants. Which of the followings is/are correct?
1) Increase 𝐴𝐴 will increase the magnitude of 𝑬𝑬 ��⃗ at all points;
2) Increase 𝐴𝐴 will decrease the magnitude of �𝑬𝑬⃗ at all points;
3) ��⃗
𝑬𝑬 has no 𝑧𝑧 component;
��⃗ at the origin is zero.
4) 𝑬𝑬
Make sure you understand and know how to prove each result.
𝒊𝒊̂ 𝒋𝒋̂
c)