EUDCA Airflow Management in Data Centres - A Practical Approach FINAL Jan 24
EUDCA Airflow Management in Data Centres - A Practical Approach FINAL Jan 24
Overview
The purpose of this paper is to provide practical tools for calculating data centre cooling and airflow requirements,
and to outline best practices regarding airflow management in data centres to maximise data centre cooling efficiency
and minimise airflow waste. A lot has been written on this important subject, and much has been forgotten over the
years. In some respects, this paper takes a step back in time to provide a reminder of the most important objectives
of airflow management.
Based on the assumption that cooling infrastructure consumes approximately 30% of total data centre power
(representing the 70 – 80% of the infrastructure energy consumption), by optimising cooling and airflow, the overall
efficiency of a data centre can be improved, reducing the carbon footprint associated with its operation as well as
operating expenses. On the other hand, considering commitments made by the CNDCP as well as the need for new
data centres to have a PUE of less than 1.3 or 1.4 (depending on the climate), the need to improve airflow management
will be effectively mandatory and therefore should be in sharp focus.
Further challenges emerge from the trend towards super densification, with rack power densities rising from around
1kW/sqm 5 years ago to 3kW/sqm today. At the same time, it has become important to raise temperature setpoints
in order to operate data centre air conditioning systems at higher efficiency (ASHRAE classes A1 and A2), adding further
importance to good airflow management practices.
The calculation of cooling requirements and airflow is a very complex part of the design process and employs various
methods such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling. This paper should not be considered as a design tool,
but it does provide practical ways to define where your facility stands and outlines best practices to improve both
cooling and airflow efficiency.
The EU Code of Conduct (EUCoC) for Data Centers Energy Efficiency Best Practice Guidelines is a good source of further
information: chapter 5 includes identified and recognised practices related to cooling energy efficiency improvement.
This method ignores sources of environmental heat such as sunlight through windows and heat conducted from
internal and external walls which should also be considered where appropriate.
If UPS with battery is in the same area with IT equipment, heat load should be included in the calculation worksheet.
Once the total cooling requirements are determined, it is possible to calculate the proper size and the operation of an
air conditioning system.
Humidification / dehumidification loads is another factor that affects the cooling units’ operation, but this should be
treated separately from cooling loads. For the purpose of calculating the cooling units’ output, we should use the net
sensible cooling capacity.
Once the requirements of the IT equipment are specified and the total airflow volume requirements are calculated,
the size of the air supply system of the air conditioner can be easily checked. Generally, achieving the desired airflow
to a single rack requires special effort including careful raised floor design, CRAC / CRAH placement, and the control
of underfloor airflow obstacles referred to in the optimisation chapter.
Page |4
Care should be taken for older facilities that have been designed with ΔT in the region of 15 οC which when using
newer IT equipment can result in a facility “running out of air” at less than full load. If this is the case, either cooling
capacity should be redefined based on ΔT of 11οC, or complementary cooling solutions should be considered.
A key objective of good airflow management is to minimise or prevent mixing of the supply airstream (cold air) and
the return or exhaust airstream (hot air), at the same time delivering the correct volume of cold air to cool the servers.
In other words, to maintain the IT equipment at an operational temperature within warranty requirements. Partial or
full containment should be considered in all cases, as this is one of the best practices to segregate supply and return
air, achieving higher efficiency and increasing cooling capability for higher IT loads.
In order to increase data centre efficiency (cooling efficiency and consequently improve PUE), in addition to
segregating supply and return airstreams, it is also vital to eliminate air losses in unwanted spots. The table below
indicates the key contributing factors to low performing airflow management, their consequences, and ways for them
to be controlled.
Page |5
Airflow Management
Contributing
Consequence Control
Factor
Unwanted air circulation between the data hall Seal up every cable or pipe transit to
Room air to other rooms or external areas. Increased isolate data hall from other rooms or
losses energy consumption from cooling units. external areas. All materials used to
Reduced air volume to the racks. seal transits must be flame retardant.
Reduces cold air supply to the IT equipment Seal space between cabinets. Often,
Air losses
installed in higher level within a rack and structural building columns prevent
between the
increases energy consumption due to hot/cold the placement of a cabinet. This often
racks
air mixture. leaves a gap in the row.
Air mixture Reduces cold air supply to the IT equipment Deploy certificated components that
between installed in higher level within a rack and can isolate cold aisle and prevent
hot/cold increases energy consumption due to hot/cold hot/cold air mixture or create
aisles air mixture. hot/cold containments.
Cables under Cables under the raised floor is the main Manage underfloor installations.
the raised "obstacle" that reduces air supply in the cold Move data and power cables installed
floor aisles. under the raised floor to the ceiling.
Page |6
Airflow Management
Contributing
Consequence Control
Factor
Conventional Replace conventional perforated tiles
Conventional perforated tiles are not
perforated with directional and variable airflow
adjustable to air direction and air volume
tiles grills
The most fundamental quote in business “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it” is also applicable for this case.
It is also important to choose (or adapt) your cooling strategy, based on IT requirements / rack density.
- Traditional hot / cold aisle arrangement can support rack densities up to 6-7 kW. Even if the layout includes a
small proportion of racks up to 10kW, these can still be managed (although, that there may be an impact on
energy efficiency). Traditional hot/cold aisle arrangement is not a recommendation anymore, since that mix
of hot and cold air is unavoidable, resulting in inefficiencies.
- Use semi-closed Hot / Cold aisle containment for rack densities close to 10kW. There are arrangements that
are easy to retrofit in existing facilities.
1 DCIM: Data Centre Infrastructure Management tools, measure and monitor IT equipment and infrastructure components (PDUs, CRACs, CRAHs, etc), providing
means to manage data centre utilisation and operation, and increase efficiency.
2 CFD: Computational Fluid Dynamics models, use numerical algorithms to analyse and model the air flow, considering surfaces, obstacles and real architecture
- Use Hot or Cold Aisle Containment for high density racks (>10kW). This can easily support 20-25 kW per rack
depending on the cold aisle width (2 or 3 tiles) and the Δt selected to operate.
- The use of In-row cooling units and Hot Aisle Containment deployment gives extra features in airflow
management and cooling consumption optimisation, controlling the flow based on rack density.
Conclusion
Cooling and airflow management is highly complex and requires a deep analysis during the design process. Several
tools are available for this purpose, including CFD modelling. Successive generations of CPUs are becoming
increasingly power dense putting a greater strain on legacy data centre airflow/ cooling systems.
Despite new technologies for supporting cooling strategy in white spaces, the well-known method of utilising down
flow with a raised floor plenum is still the most common approach for colocation providers, since it offers flexibility
in implementing different deployments in the same area.
A data centre is a dynamic environment. Airflow is likely to be changed every time moves, adds and changes are
made to the IT load.
Inefficient airflow management and the associated challenge of stranded capacity in data centres (a further source
of inefficiency) can prevent data centres meeting their design intent and lowering ROI.
Using practical tools for calculating data centre cooling and airflow requirements, and implementing best practices on
a regular basis, maximises data centre cooling efficiency and minimises airflow waste.
Improving cooling efficiency and therefore the overall efficiency of a data centre is neither an Opex or ROI objective,
but a social responsibility.
References
• Neil Rasmussen, (2017), Calculating Total Cooling Requirements for Data Centres, Schneider Electric
• Liz Marshall and Paul Bemis, (2011), Using CFD for Data Centre Design and Analysis, Applied Math Modeling
Inc., Concord, New Hampshire
• Mike Peterson, (2016), 3 Data Centre Uses for Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling
• Rob Folke, (2006), Practical Standards to Measure HVAC System Performance, viewed on July 2019,
https://www.contractingbusiness.com/archive/article/20865137/practical-standards-to-measure-hvac-
system-performance
• EUCoC on Data Centre Energy Efficiency – Best Practice Guidelines
https://e3p.jrc.ec.europa.eu/communities/data-centres-code-conduct
Authors
Page |8
Reviewers