Radio-Frequency Channel Arrangements For Medium-And High-Capacity Digital Fixed Wireless Systems Operating in The 6 425-7 125 MHZ Band
Radio-Frequency Channel Arrangements For Medium-And High-Capacity Digital Fixed Wireless Systems Operating in The 6 425-7 125 MHZ Band
384-11
(03/2012)
F Series
Fixed service
ii Rec. ITU-R F.384-11
Foreword
The role of the Radiocommunication Sector is to ensure the rational, equitable, efficient and economical use of the
radio-frequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, including satellite services, and carry out studies without
limit of frequency range on the basis of which Recommendations are adopted.
The regulatory and policy functions of the Radiocommunication Sector are performed by World and Regional
Radiocommunication Conferences and Radiocommunication Assemblies supported by Study Groups.
Series Title
BO Satellite delivery
BR Recording for production, archival and play-out; film for television
BS Broadcasting service (sound)
BT Broadcasting service (television)
F Fixed service
M Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services
P Radiowave propagation
RA Radio astronomy
RS Remote sensing systems
S Fixed-satellite service
SA Space applications and meteorology
SF Frequency sharing and coordination between fixed-satellite and fixed service systems
SM Spectrum management
SNG Satellite news gathering
TF Time signals and frequency standards emissions
V Vocabulary and related subjects
Note: This ITU-R Recommendation was approved in English under the procedure detailed in Resolution ITU-R 1.
Electronic Publication
Geneva, 2012
ITU 2012
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without written permission of ITU.
Rec. ITU-R F.384-11 1
(1963-1966-1974-1982-1986-1990-1995-1999-2003-2006-2007-2012)
Scope
This Recommendation provides radio-frequency channel arrangements for fixed wireless systems operating
in the upper 6 GHz band (6 425-7 125 MHz), which may be used for high-, medium- and low-capacity fixed
systems. The channel separation recommended in the main text are 40, 30, 20, 10 and 5 MHz with the
interleaved arrangements with possible use of the co-channel arrangements; recommended arrangements
with 14, 7 and 3.5 MHz channel separations in combination with the 30 MHz arrangement are also provided
in Annex 2. The use of multi-carrier transmission based on these arrangements is also considered in the
Annex 1 providing detailed description of this application.
recommends
1 that the preferred RF channel arrangement for up to eight go and eight return channels, each
accommodating a bit rate of the order of 140 Mbit/s, or synchronous digital hierarchy bit rates (see
Note 2), and operating at frequencies in the upper 6 GHz band, should be derived as follows:
Let f0 be the frequency of the centre of the band of frequencies occupied (MHz),
fn be the centre frequency of one RF channel in the lower half of the band (MHz),
f n′ be the centre frequency of one RF channel in the upper half of the band (MHz),
then the frequencies of individual channels are expressed by the following relationships:
lower half of the band: fn = f0 – 350 + 40 n MHz
upper half of the band: f n′ = f0 – 10 + 40 n MHz
where:
n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8;
1.1 that, in the section over which the international connection is arranged, all the go channels
should be in one half of the band, and all the return channels should be in the other half of the band;
1.2 that different polarizations may be used alternately for adjacent RF channels in the same
half of the band;
1.3 that the go and return channels on a given section should preferably use polarizations as
shown below and in Fig. 1a (see Note 2 and Note 3):
Go Return
H(V) 1 3 5 7 1′ 3′ 5′ 7′
V(H) 2 4 6 8 2′ 4′ 6′ 8′
1.4 that for improving the spectral efficiency the co-channel arrangement in Fig. 1b) may also
be used for digital FWS;
1.5 that when very high-capacity links (e.g. twice STM-1) are required and network
coordination permits, with the agreement of the administrations concerned, the use of any two
adjacent 40 MHz channels specified in recommends 1 is possible, for wider bandwidth systems,
with the centre frequency lying in the central point of the distance between the two 40 MHz
adjacent channels;
FIGURE 1a
Radio-frequency alternated channel arrangement for high capacity fixed wireless systems
(All frequencies in MHz)
fo
340 340
340
F.0384-01a
Rec. ITU-R F.384-11 3
FIGURE 1b
Radio-frequency co-channel arrangement for high capacity fixed wireless systems
(All frequencies in MHz)
fo
340 340
340
40 60
F.0384-01b
FIGURE 2
Radio-frequency for medium capacity fixed wireless systems
(All frequencies in MHz)
fo
340 340
340
20 40
F.0384-02
3 that if multi-carrier transmission (Note 4) is employed, the overall number of n carriers will
be regarded as a single channel. The centre frequency of that channel should be derived from
recommends 1, recommends 1.6 or recommends 4.2, disregarding the actual centre frequencies of
the individual carriers, which may vary, for technical reasons, according to practical
implementations. Operation of multi-carrier systems is addressed in greater detail in Annex 1;
4 that the preferred RF channel arrangement for up to ten go and ten return 30 MHz channels,
each accommodating a bit rate of the order of 155 Mbit/s, or SDH bit rates (see Note 1), should be
derived as follows:
4 Rec. ITU-R F.384-11
Let f0 be the frequency of the centre of the band of frequencies occupied (MHz),
fn be the centre frequency of one RF channel in the lower half of the band (MHz),
f n′ be the centre frequency of one RF channel in the upper half of the band (MHz),
then the frequencies of individual channels are expressed by the following relationships:
lower half of the band: fn = f 0 – 340 + 30 n MHz
upper half of the band: f n′ = f 0 + 30 n MHz
where:
n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10.
n = 11 may also be considered, taking into account the limited centre-gap (10 MHz) between
channels 11 and 1′ and the overlapping with channel 1′ of the 20 MHz channel arrangement in
recommends 2. However, its usage might add further flexibility in coordinating congested areas of
the network;
4.1 that when the equipment and network characteristics permit, co-channel frequency reuse
can be employed, with the agreement of the administrations concerned, for improving spectral
efficiency;
4.2 that when very high capacity links (e.g. twice Synchronous Transfer Mode-1 (STM-1)) are
required and network coordination permits, with the agreement of the administrations concerned,
the use of any two adjacent 30 MHz channels specified in recommends 4 is possible, for wider
bandwidth system, with centre frequency lying in the central point of the distance between the two
30 MHz adjacent channels;
4.3 that RF channel arrangements with 14 MHz, 7 MHz and 3.5 MHz may be obtained by a
suitable channel subdivision coherent with the 30 MHz RF channels as shown in Annex 2;
5 that the preferred RF channel arrangement for up to 32 go and 32 return 10 MHz
channels, each accommodating digital synchronous medium capacity rates, should be expressed by
the following relationships:
lower half of the band: fn = f0 – 340 + 10 n MHz
upper half of the band: f n′ = f0 + 10 n MHz
where:
n = 1, 2, 3, . . . 31, 32;
6 that the preferred RF channel arrangement for up to 64 go and 64 return 5 MHz channels,
each accommodating digital synchronous medium capacity rates, should be expressed by the
following relationships:
lower half of the band: fn = f0 – 340 + 5 n MHz
upper half of the band: f n′ = f0 + 5 + 5 n MHz
where:
n = 1, 2, 3, . . . 63, 64;
7 that the preferred centre frequency f0, is 6 770 MHz; in addition, other centre frequencies
may be used by agreement between the administrations concerned;
Rec. ITU-R F.384-11 5
8 that RF channel arrangements with 20 MHz, 10 MHz, and 5 MHz may also be alternatively
obtained by subdividing the 40 MHz RF channels of the arrangement in recommends 1.
NOTE 1 – Actual gross bit rates including overhead may be as much as 5% or more higher than net
transmission rates.
NOTE 2 – When common transmit-receive antennas are used and channel 8 is used together with
channel 1′, either in the arrangement of Fig. 1a or in the even more problematic arrangement of Fig.
1b, special branching and filters arrangement may be needed for limiting mutual impairments and
permitting their common operation.
NOTE 3 − In previous versions of this Recommendation, the alternative arrangement of
polarization, shown below, has been recommended and used in past deployment of analogue
systems up to 2 700 channels. Such an arrangement is possibly maintained in the migration to
digital systems and may still be in use by agreement between the administrations concerned:
Go Return
H(V) 1 3 5 7 2′ 4′ 6′ 8′
V(H) 2 4 6 8 1′ 3′ 5′ 7′
NOTE 4 – A multi-carrier system is a system with n (where n > 1) digitally modulated carrier
signals simultaneously transmitted (or received) by the same RF equipment. The centre frequency
should be regarded as the arithmetic average of the n individual carrier frequencies of the multi-
carrier system.
Annex 1
A multi-carrier system is a system with n (where n > 1) digitally modulated carrier signals
simultaneously transmitted (or received) by the same RF equipment.
For high capacity multi-carrier transmission, the centre frequency of the channel should coincide
with one of the corresponding frequencies of the basic channel arrangements given in
recommends 1, recommends 1.6 or recommends 4.2. The channel spacing may be an integer
multiple of the basic values defined by recommends 1, 2 or 4. Compatibility with existing
configurations has to be taken into account when choosing the appropriate alternative.
Examples of co-polar frequency reuse channel arrangements using a two-carrier system with
64-QAM are shown in Fig. 3. Each carrier is modulated with 155.52 Mbit/s (STM-1).
The centre frequencies of the channel arrangement in Fig. 3a) are derived from recommends 1 by
setting n = 2, 4, 6, 8. Channel spacing is 80 MHz. Each RF-channel contains 2 × 2 carriers allocated
at ±17.5 MHz around the centre frequency using both polarizations. This was preferable when
analogue to digital transition was in progress.
Figure 3b) shows an interleaved channel arrangement where centre frequencies are derived from
recommends 1.6 by combining channels with n = 1 and 2, 3 and 4, 5 and 6, 7 and 8. This channel
arrangement is preferred because it provides more symmetrical guardbands at the band edges.
6 Rec. ITU-R F.384-11
FIGURE 3
Example of radio-frequency channel arrangements for a 2 × 2 × 155.52 Mbit/s (4 × STM-1) fixed
wireless system operating with 80 MHz channel spacing in the upper 6 GHz band
(All frequencies in MHz)
6 770
6 500 6 580 6 660 6 740 6 840 6 920 7 000 7 080
80
340
6 770
6 480 6 560 6 640 6 720 6 820 6 900 6 980 7 060
80
340
b) Channel arrangement preferred if compatibility with analogue radio-relay systems is not required
F.0384-03
Annex 2
Narrow-band 14 MHz, 7 MHz and 3.5 MHz channels are obtained formally subdividing each of the
30 MHz channels provided in recommends 4 using the residual 2 MHz as internal guardbands
between each 30 MHz slot as shown in Fig. 4.
The whole set of channels centre frequencies may be obtained by the following relationships:
a) for systems with a carrier spacing of 14 MHz:
lower half of the band: fn = f0 − 340 + 9 + n*14 + 2*integer((n − 1)/2)
upper half of the band: fn′ = f0 + 9 + n*14 + 2*integer((n − 1)/2)
where:
n = 1, 2, 3, …, 21, 22
Rec. ITU-R F.384-11 7
FIGURE 4
30 MHz, 14 MHz, 7 MHz and 3.5 MHz combined spectrum occupancy
6425 MHz
6770 MHz
7125 MHz
6460
6490
6520
6760
6800
7040
7070
7100
30 MHz 1 2 3 10 11 1' 2' 9' 10' 11'
6453
6467
6483
6497
7063
7077
7093
7107
14 MHz 1 2 3 4 19' 20' 21' 22'
6449.5
6470.5
6479.5
6500.5
7059.5
7080.5
7089.5
7110.5
6472.25
6477.75
6502.25
7057.75
7082.25
7087.75
7112.25
73'
74'
75'
76'
77'
78'
79'
80'
81'
82'
83'
84'
85'
86'
87'
88'
1 2 34 5 6 7 8
10
12
13
14
15
16
3.5 MHz
11
9
F.0384-04
______________