4 - Requirement Engineering
4 - Requirement Engineering
Requirements Engineering
Two kinds of requirements based on the intended purpose and target audience:
User requirements
High-level abstract requirements written as statements, in a natural language plus diagrams, of what
services the system is expected to provide to system users and the constraints under which it must
operate.
System requirements
Detailed description of what the system should do including the software system's functions, services,
and operational constraints. The system requirements document (sometimes called a functional
specification) should define exactly what is to be implemented. It may be part of the contract between
the system buyer and the software developers.
Functional requirements
Statements of services the system should provide, how the system should react to particular inputs
and how the system should behave in particular situations. May state what the system should not do.
Non-functional requirements
Constraints on the services or functions offered by the system such as timing constraints, constraints
on the development process, standards, etc. Often apply to the system as a whole rather than
individual features or services.
Domain requirements
Constraints on the system derived from the domain of operation.
Functional requirements
Functional requirements describe functionality or system services. They depend on the type of software,
expected users and the type of system where the software is used.
Functional user requirements may be high-level statements of what the system should do.
Functional system requirements should describe the system services in detail.
Problems arise when requirements are not precisely stated. Ambiguous requirements may be interpreted in
different ways by developers and users. In principle, requirements should be both
Non-functional requirements
Non-functional requirements define system properties and constraints e.g. reliability, response time and
storage requirements. Constraints are I/O device capability, system representations, etc. Process
requirements may also be specified mandating a particular IDE, programming language or development
method. Non-functional requirements may be more critical than functional requirements. If these are not
met, the system may be useless.
Non-functional requirements may affect the overall architecture of a system rather than the individual
components. A single non-functional requirement, such as a security requirement, may generate a number of
related functional requirements that define system services that are required. It may also generate
requirements that restrict existing requirements.
Product requirements
Requirements which specify that the delivered product must behave in a particular way e.g. execution
speed, reliability, etc.
Organizational requirements
Requirements which are a consequence of organizational policies and procedures e.g. process
standards used, implementation requirements, etc.
External requirements
Requirements which arise from factors which are external to the system and its development process
e.g. interoperability requirements, legislative requirements, etc.
Non-functional requirements may be very difficult to state precisely and imprecise requirements may be
difficult to verify. If they are stated as a goal (a general intention of the user such as ease of use), they
should be rewritten as a verifiable non-functional requirement (a statement using some quantifiable
metric that can be objectively tested). Goals are helpful to developers as they convey the intentions of the
system users.
Domain requirements
The system's operational domain imposes requirements on the system. Domain requirements may be new
functional or non-functional requirements, constraints on existing requirements, or define specific
computations. If domain requirements are not satisfied, the system may be unworkable. Two main
problems with domain requirements:
Understandability
Requirements are expressed in the language of the application domain, which is not always
understood by software engineers developing the system.
Implicitness
Domain specialists understand the area so well that they do not think of making the domain
requirements explicit.
Requirements engineering process
Processes vary widely depending on the application domain, the people involved and the organization
developing the requirements. In practice, requirements engineering is an iterative process, in which the
following generic activities are interleaved:
Requirements elicitation;
Requirements analysis;
Requirements validation;
Requirements management.
Requirements discovery
Interacting with stakeholders to discover their requirements. Domain requirements are also discovered
at this stage.
Requirements classification and organization
Groups related requirements and organizes them into coherent clusters.
Prioritization and negotiation
Prioritizing requirements and resolving requirements conflicts.
Requirements specification
Requirements are documented and input into the next round of the spiral.
Closed (based on pre-determined list of questions) and open interviews with stakeholders are a part of the
RE process. User stories and scenarios are real-life examples of how a system can be used, which are
usually easy for stakeholders to understand. Scenarios should include descriptions of the starting situation,
normal flow of events, what can go wrong, other concurrent activities, the state of the system when the
scenario finishes.
Use-cases are a scenario-based technique in the UML which identify the actors in an interaction and which
describe the interaction itself. A set of use cases should describe all possible interactions with the system.
In principle, requirements should state what the system should do and the design should describe how it
does this. In practice, requirements and design are inseparable.
User requirements are almost always written in natural language supplemented by appropriate diagrams
and tables in the requirements document. System requirements may also be written in natural language but
other notations based on forms, graphical system models, or mathematical system models can also be used.
Natural language is expressive, intuitive and universal. This means that the requirements can be understood
by users and customers.
Structured natural language is a way of writing system requirements where the freedom of the
requirements writer is limited and all requirements are written in a standard way. This approach maintains
most of the expressiveness and understand-ability of natural language but ensures that some uniformity is
imposed on the specification.
Requirements validation
Requirements validation is concerned with demonstrating that the requirements define the system that the
customer really wants. Requirements error costs are high so validation is very important.
Validity: does the system provide the functions which best support the customer's needs?
Consistency: are there any requirements conflicts?
Completeness: are all functions required by the customer included?
Realism: can the requirements be implemented given available budget and technology?
Verifiability: can the requirements be checked?
Requirements reviews
Systematic manual analysis of the requirements. Regular reviews should be held while the
requirements definition is being formulated. What to look for:
Verifiability: is the requirement realistically testable?
Comprehensibility: is the requirement properly understood?
Traceability: is the origin of the requirement clearly stated?
Adaptability: can the requirement be changed without a large impact on other requirements?
Prototyping
Using an executable model of the system to check requirements.
Test-case generation
Developing tests for requirements to check testability.
Requirements change
Requirements management is the process of managing changing requirements during the requirements
engineering process and system development. New requirements emerge as a system is being developed
and after it has gone into use. Reasons why requirements change after the system's deployment:
The business and technical environment of the system always changes after installation.
The people who pay for a system and the users of that system are rarely the same people.
Large systems usually have a diverse user community, with many users having different requirements
and priorities that may be conflicting or contradictory.