Beee Unit 3 Sem2 Engineering
Beee Unit 3 Sem2 Engineering
2 𝟑
Derive Newton’s iterative formula for √𝑵 and hence find the value of √𝟐𝟒
𝟑 BL
5
Solution:
Let x 3 N x N x N 0
3 3
Let f x x3 N ; f ( x) 3x2
f xn xn3 N; f ( xn ) 3xn2
f ( xn )
The Newton-Raphson formula is xn 1 xn
f ( xn )
xn3 N 3xn3 xn3 N
xn 2
3xn 3xn 2
2 xn3 N 1 2 xn3 N 1 N
2
2 2 2 xn 2
3xn 3 xn xn 3 xn
1 N
Therefore, the Newton-Raphson iterative formula for 3 N is 2 xn 2
3 xn
1 24
2 xn 2
3
Hence, the Newton-Raphson iterative formula for 24 is
3 xn
1 24
xn1 2 xn 2
3 xn
1 24 1 24
x1 2 x0 2 2 3 2 2.8889
3 x0 3 3
1 24 1 24
x2 2 x1 2 2 2.8889 2.8845
3 x1 3 2.8889
2
1 24 1 24
x3 2 x2 2 2 2.8845 2.8845
3 x2 3 2.8845
2
2nd and 3rd iterations are equal, stop the process. The root is 2.8845
3 Find a root of x log10 x 1.2 0 by Newton - Raphson method correct to three decimal places. BL
5
Solution:
Given x log10 x 1.2 0
Let f x x log10 x 1.2
When x 1 f 1 1log10 1 1.2 1.2 ve
When x 2 f 2 2log10 2 1.2 0.5979 ve
When x 3 f 3 3log10 3 1.2 0.2314 ve
Here f 2 is negative and f 3 is positive. Therefore, the root lies between 2 and 3.
Since f 3 f 2 0.2314 0.5979 , Let x0 3
f xn
Newton’s formula is xn1 xn
f ' xn
Given f x x log10 x 1.2
f xn 3xn sin xn e xn
Now, xn1 xn xn
f ' xn 3 cos xn e xn
f x0 3 0.5 sin 0.5 e0.5
x1 x0 0.5 0.3516
f ' x0 3 cos 0.5 e 0.5
f x1 3 0.3516 sin 0.3516 e0.3516
x2 x1 0.3516 0.3604
f ' x1 3 cos 0.3516 e 0.3516
f x2 3 0.3604 sin 0.3604 e0.3604
x3 x2 0.3604 0.3604
f ' x2 3 cos 0.3604 e0.3604
2nd and 3rd iterations are equal, stop the process. The root is 0.3604
5 Solve x 2 y 5z 9, 3 x y 2z 5, 2 x 3 y z 3 by Gauss elimination BL
method. 5
Solution:
Given x 2 y 5z 9
3x y 2 z 5
2x 3 y z 3
The matrix form for the given system of linear equations is
1 2 5 x 9
3 1 2 y 5
2 3 1 z 3
(i.e) AX B
x 2 y 5z 9 …………………………(1)
0 x 7 y 17 z 32 …………………..…..(2)
0x 0 y 46z 115 ………..……………(3)
115
From (3), 46 z 115 z 2.5
46
Substitute z 2.5 in (2),
7 y 17 2.5 32 7 y 32 42.5
7 y 10.5
10.5
y 1.5
7
Substitute z 2.5, y 1.5 in (1),
x 2 y 5z 9 x 9 5z 2 y 9 5 2.5 2 1.5 9 12.5 3 0.5
x 0.5, y 1.5, z 2.5
6 Solve 2 x1 3 x2 x3 1, 5 x1 x2 x3 9, 3 x1 2 x2 4 x3 11 by Gauss BL
elimination method. [May 2021] 5
Solution:
Given 2 x1 3x2 x3 1
5 x1 x2 x3 9
3x1 2 x2 4 x3 11
The matrix form for the given system of linear equations is
2 3 1 x1 1
5 1 1 x2 9
3 2 4 x 11
3
(i.e) AX B
Therefore, the augmented matrix is
2 3 1 1
A B 5 1 1 9
3 2 4 11
STAGE :1 2 R2 : 10 2 2 18
5 R1 : 10 15 5 5
2 3 1 1
R2 : 2 R2 5 R1 R2 : 0 13 3 23
0 13 3 23 R3 : 2 R3 3R1
0 5 5 25
2 R3 : 6 4 8 22
3R1 : 6 9 3 3
R3 : 0 5 5 25
STAGE:2 13R3 : 0 65 65 325
2 3 1 1 5 R2 : 0 65 15 115
0 13 3 23 R3 :13R3 5R2 R3 : 0 0 80 210
0 0 80 210
2 x1 3x2 x3 1 ……………………………(1)
0 x1 13 x2 3 x3 23 ………………………..(2)
0 x1 0 x2 80 x3 210 ………..….…………(3)
Solution:
Given 2 x 3 y z 5,
4 x 4 y 3z 3,
2x 3 y 2 z 2
The matrix form for the given system of linear equations is
2 3 1 x 5
4 4 3 y 3
2 3 2 z 2
(i.e) AX B
Therefore, the augmented matrix is
2 3 1 5
A B 4 4 3 3
2 3 2 2
R2 : 4 4 3 3
STAGE :1 2 R1 : 4 6 2 10
R2 : 0 2 1 7
2 3 1 5
R2 R2 2 R1
0 2 1 7 R3 R3 R1 R3 : 2 3 2 2
0 6 3 3
R1 : 2 3 1 5
R3 : 0 6 3 3
STAGE:2
R3 : 0 6 3 3
2 3 1 5
3R2 : 0 6 3 21
0 2 1 7 R3 R3 3R2
0 0 6 18 R3 : 0 0 6 18
2 x 3 y z 5 ……………………………(1)
2 y z 7 …………………………..(2)
6 z 18 …………..….…………(3)
18
From (3) 6z 18 z z3
6
Substitute the value z 3in 2 ,
2 y z 7 2 y 3 7 2y 7 3 2y 4 y2
Substitute the values z 3 & y 2in 1 ,
2x 3 2 3 5 2 x 6 3 5 2 x 3 5
2x 3 y z 5
2x 5 3 2x 2 x 1
x 1, y 2 , z 3
8 Solve 10 x y z 12, 2 x 10 y z 13, x y 5z 7 by Gauss - Jordan method. BL
5
Solution:
Given 10 x y z 12
2 x 10 y z 13
x y 5z 7
The matrix form for the given system of linear equations is
10 1 1 x 12
2 10 1 y 13
1 1 5 z 7
(i.e) AX B
Therefore, the augmented matrix is
10 1 1 12
A B 2 10 1 13
1 1 5 7
5R2 : 10 50 5 65
STAGE: 1
R1 : 10 1 1 12
10 1 1 12
R2 : 5R2 R1 R2 : 0 49 4 53
0 49 4 53 R3 :10 R3 R1
0 9 49 58
10 R3 : 10 10 50 70
R1 : 10 1 1 12
R3 : 0 9 49 58
STAGE: 2
10 1 1 12 49 R3 : 0 441 2401 2842
R3 : 49 R3 9 R2 9 R2 : 0 441 36 477
0 49 4 53
0 0 2365 2365 R3 : 0 0 2365 2365
R3
10 1 1 12 R3 :
R3 2365
0 49 4 53
R3 :
2365
0 0 1 1
STAGE: 3
10 1 0 11
R1 : 10 1 1 12
0 49 0 49 R3 : 0 0 1 1
0 0 1 1
R1 : 10 1 0 11
R1 : R1 R3 R2 : 0 49 4 53
R2 : R2 4 R3 4 R3 : 0 0 4 4
R2 : 0 49 0 49
STAGE: 4
490 0 0 490 49 R1 : 490 49 0 539
R1 : 49 R1 R2
0 49 0 49 R2 : 0 49 0 49
0 0 1 1 R1 : 490 0 0 490
490 x 490 x 1
49 y 49 y 1
z 1 x 1, y 1, z 1
R1 : 63 21 0 168
63 0 0 189
R2 : 0 21 0 21
0 21 0 21 R1 : R1 R3 R1 : 63 0 0 189
0 0 21 42
189
63x1 3 x1 x1 3
63
21
21x 2 21 x 2 x2 1
21
42
21x 3 42 x 3 2 x1 3, x 2 1, x3 2
21
10 Solve 2 x y 3z 8, x 2 y z 4, 3 x y 4z 0 by Gauss - Jordan method. B
L
5
Solution:
2 1 3 8
Write the given system of equation in augmented matrix form [A,B] = 1 2 1 4
3 1 4 0
STAGE 1: 2 R2 : 2 4 2 8
2 1 3 8 R1 : 2 1 3 8
0 3 5 16 R2 : 2 R2 R1 R2 : 0 3 5 16
3 1 4 0
STAGE 2: 2 R3 : 6 2 8 0
2 1 3 8 3R1 : 6 3 9 24
0 3 5 16 R3 : 2 R3 3R1 R3 : 0 5 17 24
0 5 17 24
STAGE 3: 3R3 : 0 15 51 72
2 1 3 8 5 R2 : 0 15 25 80
0 3 5 16 R3 : 3R3 5R2 R3 : 0 0 76 152
0 0 76 152
2 1 3 8
R3
0 3 5 16 R3 :
0 0 76
1 2
STAGE 4: R2 : 0 3 5 16
2 1 3 8 5 R3 : 0 0 5 10
0 3 0 6 R2 : R2 5R3 R2 : 0 3 0 6
0 0 1 2
STAGE 5:
2 1 0 2 R1 : 2 1 3 8
3R3 : 0 0 3 6
0 3 0 6 R1 : R1 3R3
0 0 1 2 R1 : 2 1 0 2
STAGE 6:
6 0 0 12 3R1 : 6 3 0 6
R2 : 0 3 0 6
0 3 0 6 R1 : 3R1 R2
0 0 1 2 R1 : 6 0 0 12
6x 0 y 0z 12 ………..………………………(1)
12
x 2
6
0 x 3 y 0 z 6 ………………………..………..(2)
6
y 2
3
0 x 0 y 1z 2 …………………………………(3)
z2
x 2, y 2, z 2 .
11 Solve x 3 y 3z 16, x 4 y 3z 18, x 3 y 4z 19 by Gauss - Jordan method. B
L
5
Solution:
1 3 3 16
Write the given system of equation in augmented matrix form [A,B] = 1 4 3 18
1 3 4 19
STAGE 1: R2 : 1 4 3 18
1 3 3 16 R1 : 1 3 3 16
1 4 3 18 R2 R2 R1 R2 : 0 1 0 2
1 3 4 19 R3 R3 R1
R3 : 1 3 4 19
1 3 3 16
R1 : 1 3 3 16
0 1 0 2 R2 : 0 0 1 3
0 0 1 3
STAGE 2:
R1 : 1 3 3 16
1 0 3 10
3R2 : 0 3 0 6
0 1 0 2 R1 R1 3R2 R1 : 1 0 3 10
0 0 1 3
STAGE 3: R1 : 1 0 3 10
1 0 0 1 3R3 : 0 0 3 9
0 1 0 2 R1 R1 3R3 R1 : 1 0 0 1
0 0 1 3
x 0 y 0z 1 ………..………………………(1)
x 1
0 x y 0 z 2 ………………………..………..(2)
y2
0 x 0 y z 3 …………………………………(3)
z 3
x 1, y 2, z 3 .
Solution:
The given system is
27 x 6 y – z 85
x y 54 z 110
6 x 15 y 2 z 72
Since the equation does not satisfy diagonally dominant condition, we rearrange the equations
27 x 6 y – z 85
6 x 15 y 2 z 72
x y 54 z 110
1
x 85 6 y z
27
1
y 72 6 x 2 z
15
1
z 110 x y
54
Let the initial values be x0 0, y0 0, z0 0
Iterations 1 1 1
xn 1 85 6 yn zn yn 1 72 6 xn 2 zn zn 1 110 xn yn
27 15 54
1 1 1
x1 85 6 y0 z0 y1 [72 6 x0 2 z0 ] z1 110 x0 y0
Initial 27 15 54
Iteration 1 1 1
[85 6 0 0] 72 6 0 2 0 110 0 0
(n=0) 27 15 54
3.148 4.800 2.037
1 1 1
x2 85 6 y1 z1 y2 72 6 x1 2 z1 z2 110 x1 y1
27 15 54
1 1 1
1 85 6 4.800 2.037 72 6 3.148 2 2.037 110 3.148 4.800
27 15 54
2.157 3.269 1.890
1 1 1
x3 85 6 y2 z2 y3 72 6 x2 2 z2 z3 110 x2 y2
27 15 54
1 1 1
2 85 6 3.269 1.890 72 6 2.157 2 1.890 110 2.157 3.269
27 15 54
2.492 3.685 1.937
1 1 1
x4 85 6 y3 z3 y4 72 6 x3 2 z3 z4 110 x3 y3
27 15 54
1 1 1
3 85 6 3.685 1.937 72 6 2.492 2 1.937 110 2.492 3.685
27 15 54
2.401 3.545 1.923
1 1 1
x5 85 6 y4 z4 y5 72 6 x4 2 z4 z5 110 x4 y4
27 15 54
4 1 1 1
85 6 3.545 1.923 72 6 2.401 2 1.923 110 2.401 3.545
27 15 54
2.432 3.583 1.927
1 1 1
x6 85 6 y5 z5 y6 72 6 x5 2 z5 z6 110 x5 y5
27 15 54
1 1 1
5 85 6 3.583 1.927 72 6 2.432 2 1.927 110 2.432 3.583
27 15 54
2.423 3.570 1.926
1 1 1
x7 85 6 y6 z6 y7 72 6 x6 2 z6 z7 110 x6 y6
27 15 54
1 1 1
6 85 6 3.570 1.926 72 6 2.423 2 1.926 110 2.423 3.570
27 15 54
2.425 3.573 1.926
1 1 1
x8 85 6 y7 z7 y8 72 6 x7 2 z7 z8 110 x7 y7
27 15 54
1 1 1
7 85 6 3.574 1.926 72 6 2.426 2 1.926 110 2.426 3.574
27 15 54
2.425 3.573 1.926
1 1 1
Iterations xn1
20
17 yn 2 zn yn1
20
18 3xn zn zn1
20
25 2 xn 3 yn
1 1 1
x1 17 y0 2 z0 y1 18 3x0 z0 z1 25 2 x0 3 y0
Initial 20 20 20
Iteration 1 1 1
17 0 2 0 18 3 0 0 25 2 0 3 0
(n=0) 20 20 20
x1 0.85 y1 0.9 z1 1.25
1 1 1
x2 17 y1 2 z1 y2 18 3x1 z1 z2 25 2 x1 3 y1
20 20 20
1 1 1 1
17 0.9 2 1.25 18 3 0.85 1.25 25 2 0.85 3 0.9
20 20 20
x2 1.02 y2 0.965 z2 1.030
1 1 1
x3 17 y2 2 z2 y3 18 3x2 z2 z3 25 2 x2 3 y2
20 20 20
2 1 1 1
17 0.965 2 1.03 18 3 1.02 1.03 25 2 1.02 3 0.965
20 20 20
x3 1.001 y3 1.002 z3 1.003
1 1
x4
20
17 y3 2 z3 1
y4 18 3x3 z3
z4
20
25 2 x3 3 y3
20
1 1
3 17 1.002 2 1.003 1 25 2 1.001 3 1.002
20 18 3 1.001 1.003 20
20
x4 1.000 z4 1.000
y4 1.000
1 1
x5 17 y4 2 z4 y5 18 3x4 z4 z5
1
25 2 x4 3 y4
20 20
20
1 1
4 17 1.000 2 1.000 18 3 1.000 1.000 1
20 20 25 2 1 3 1.000
20
x5 1.000 y5 1.000
z5 1.000
1 1 1
x4 18 y3 z3 y4 3 2 x3 2 z3 z4 6 x3 y3
8 5 3
1 1 1
3 18 0.950 2.858 3 2 1.944 2 2.858 6 1.944 0.950
8 5 3
2.012 0.966 2.965
1 1 1
x5 18 y4 z4 y5 3 2 x4 2 z4 z5 6 x4 y4
8 5 3
4 1 1 1
18 0.966 2.965 3 2 2.012 2 2.965 6 2.012 0.966
8 5 3
2.000 0.981 2.993
1 1 1
x6 18 y5 z5 y6 3 2 x5 2 z5 z6 6 x5 y5
8 5 3
1 1 1
5 18 0.981 2.993 3 2 2.000 2 2.993 6 2.000 0.981
8 5 3
1.999 0.997 2.994
1 1 1
x7 18 y6 z6 y7 3 2 x6 2 z6 z7 6 x6 y6
8 5 3
6 1 1 1
18 0.997 2.994 3 2 1.999 2 2.994 6 1.999 0.997
8 5 3
2.000 0.998 2.999
1 1 1
x8 18 y7 z7 y8 3 2 x7 2 z7 z8 6 x7 y7
8 5 3
7 1 1 1
18 0.998 2.999 3 2 2.000 2 2.999 6 2.000 0.998
8 5 3
2.000 1.000 2.999
1 1 1
x9 18 y8 z8 y9 3 2 x8 2 z8 z9 6 x8 y8
8 5 3
8 1 1 1
18 1.000 2.999 3 2 2.000 2 2.999 6 2.000 1.000
8 5 3
2.000 1.000 3.000
1 1 1
x10 18 y9 z9 y10 3 2 x9 2 z9 z9 6 x8 y8
8 5 3
9 1 1 1
18 1.000 3.000 3 2 2.000 2 3.000 6 2.000 1.000
8 5 3
2.000 1.000 3.000
Two successive iteration values are equal stop the process.
Hence x 2, y 1, z 3
15 Solve 30 x 2 y 3z 75, 2 x 2 y 18z 30, x 17 y 2z 48 by BL
Gauss – Seidel method. [May 2021] 5
Solution:
Solution:
The given system is 30x 2 y 3z 75,
2x 2 y 18z 30 x y 9z 15
x 17 y 2 z 48
Since the equations does not satisfy diagonally dominant condition, we rearrange the equations
30 x 2 y 3z 75
x 17 y 2 z 48
x y 9 z 15
Now, the system satisfies diagonally dominant condition.
1
x 75 2 y 3 z
30
1
y 48 x 2 z
17
1
z 15 x y
9
Let the initial values be y0 0, z0 0
Iterations 1 1 1
xn 1 75 2 yn 3zn yn 1 48 xn 1 2 zn zn 1 15 xn 1 yn 1
30 17 9
1 1 1
x1 75 2 y0 3z0 y1 48 x1 2 z0 z1 15 x1 y1
Initial 30 17 9
Iteration 1 1 1
75 0 0 48 2.500 2 0 15 2.500 2.676
(n=0) 30 17 9
2.500 2.676 1.092
1 1 1
x2 75 2 y1 3z1 y2 48 x2 2 z1 z2 15 x2 y2
30 17 9
1 1 1
1 75 2 2.676 3 1.092 48 2.569 2 1.092 15 2.569 2.801
30 17 9
2.569 2.801 1.070
1 1 1
x3 75 2 y2 3z2 y3 48 x3 2 z2 z3 15 x3 y3
30 17 9
1 1 1
2 75 2 2.801 3 1.070 48 2.580 2 1.070 15 2.580 2.798
30 17 9
2.580 2.798 1.069
1 1 1
x4 75 2 y3 3z3 y4 48 x4 2 z3 z4 15 x4 y4
30 17 9
3 1 1 1
75 2 2.798 3 1.069 48 2.580 2 1.069 15 2.580 2.798
30 17 9
2.580 2.798 1.069
Solution:
The given system is
x 2 y 5z 12
5x 2 y z 6
2 x 6 y 3z 5
Interchanging the equations
5x 2 y z 6 ----------------- (1)
2 x 6 y 3z 5 -------------------- (2)
x 2 y 5z 12 -------------------- (3)
5 2 1
Clearly the coefficient matrix 2 6 3 is diagonally dominant. Hence we can apply Gauss-Seidel method
1 2 5
without any difficulty.
From (1), (2) and (3) we get
1
x 6 2 y z --------------- (4)
5
1
y 5 2 x 3z --------------- (5)
6
1
z 12 x 2 y -------------- (6)
5
1 1 1
Iteration xn 1 6 2 yn z n yn 1 5 2 xn 1 3zn zn 1 12 xn1 2 yn1
5 6 5
1 1 1
x1 6 2 y0 z0 y1 5 2 x1 3z0 z1 12 x1 2 y1
Initial 5 6 5
Iteration 1 1 1
6 0 0 5 2 1.200 0 12 1.200 2 0.433
(n=0) 5 6 5
1.200 0.433 2.333
1 1 1
x2 6 2 y1 z1 y2 5 2 x2 3z1 z2 12 x2 2 y2
5 6 5
1 1 1
1 6 2 0.433 2.333 5 2 1.493 3 2.333 12 1.493 2 1.502
5 6 5
1.493 1.502 2.702
1 1 1
x3 6 2 y2 z 2 y3 5 2 x3 3z2 z3 12 x3 2 y3
5 6 5
2 1 1 1
6 2 1.502 2.702 5 2 1.140 3 2.702 12 1.140 2 1.804
5 6 5
1.140 1.804 2.894
1 1 1
x4 6 2 y3 z3 y4 5 2 x4 3z3 z4 12 x4 2 y4
5 6 5
1 1 1
3 6 2 1.804 2.894 5 2 1.057 3 2.894 12 1.057 2 1.928
5 6 5
1.057 1.928 2.960
1 1 1
x5 6 2 y4 z 4 y5 5 2 x5 3z4 z5 12 x5 2 y5
5 6 5
4 1 1 1
6 2 1.928 2.960 5 2 1.021 3 2.960 12 1.021 2 1.973
5 6 5
1.021 1.973 2.985
1 1 1
x6 6 2 y5 z5 y6 5 2 x6 3z5 z6 12 x6 2 y6
5 6 5
5 1 1 1
6 2 1.973 2.985 5 2 1.008 3 2.985 12 1.008 2 1.990
5 6 5
1.008 1.990 2.994
1 1 1
x7 6 2 y6 z6 y7 5 2 x7 3z6 z7 12 x7 2 y7
5 6 5
6 1 1 1
6 2 1.990 2.994 5 2 1.003 3 2.994 12 1.003 2 1.996
5 6 5
1.003 1.996 2.998
1 1 1
x8 6 2 y7 z7 y8 5 2 x8 3z7 z8 12 x8 2 y8
5 6 5
7 1 1 1
6 2 1.996 2.998 5 2 1.001 3 2.998 12 1.001 2 1.999
5 6 5
1.001 1.999 2.999
1 1 1
x9 6 2 y8 z8 y9 5 2 x9 3z8 z9 12 x9 2 y9
5 6 5
8 1 1 1
6 2 1.999 2.999 5 2 1.000 3 2.999 12 1.000 2 2.000
5 6 5
1.000 2.000 3.000
1 1 1
x10 6 2 y9 z9 y10 5 2 x10 3z9 z10 12 x10 2 y10
5 6 5
9 1 1 1
6 2 2.000 3.000 5 2 1.000 3 3.000 12 1.000 2 2.000
5 6 5
1.000 2.000 3.000
Two successive iteration values are equal stop the process.
Hence x 1, y 2, z 3
17 Solve 20 x 4 y z 32, x 3 y 10z 24, 2 x 17 y 4z 35 by BL
5
Gauss – Seidel method. [Dec 2021]
Solution:
The given system is
St. Joseph’s Institute of Technology 29
MA4202/ Statistics and Numerical Methods Department of Mathematics 2023-2024
20x 4y z 32
x 3y 10z 24
2x 17y 4z 35
Since the equation does not satisfy diagonally dominant condition, we rearrange the equation
20x 4y z 32
2x 17y 4z 35
x 3y 10z 24
Now, the system satisfies diagonally dominant condition.
1
x 32 4y z
20
1
y 35 2x 4z
17
1
z 24 x 3y
10
Let the initial values be y0 0, z0 0
Iterations 1 1 1
x n 1 (32 4y n z n ) y n 1 (35 2x n 1 4z n ) z n 1 (24 x n 1 3y n 1 )
20 17 10
1 1 1
x1 32 4y0 z 0 y1 35 2x1 4z 0 z1 24 x1 3y1
Initial 20 17 10
Iteration 1 1 1
32 4(0) (0) 35 2(1.6) 4(0) 24 (1.6) 3(1.87)
(n=0) 20 17 10
x1 1.6 y1 1.87 z1 1.68
1 1 1
x 2 32 4y1 z1 y2 35 2x 2 4z1 z 2 24 x 2 3y 2
20 17 10
1 1 1
32 4(1.87) (1.68) 35 2(1.31) 4(1.68) 24 (1.31) 3(1.51)
1 20 17 10
x 2 1.31 y2 1.51 z 2 1.82
1 1 1
x3 32 4y2 z2 y3 35 2x3 4z2 z3 24 x 3 3y3
20 17 10
2 1 1 1
32 4(1.51) (1.82) 35 2(1.39) 4(1.82) 24 (1.39) 3(1.47)
20 17 10
x 3 1.39 y3 1.47 z3 1.82
1 1 1
x 4 32 4y3 z3 y4 35 2x 4 4z3 z 4 24 x 4 3y 4
20 17 10
3 1 1 1
32 4(1.47) (1.82) 35 2(1.40) 4(1.82) 24 (1.4) 3(1.47)
20 17 10
x 4 1.40 y4 1.47 z 4 1.82
1 1 1
x5 32 4y4 z 4 y5 35 2x 5 4z 4 z5 24 x 5 3y5
20 17 10
1
1
32 4(1.47) (1.82) 35 2(1.40) 4(1.82)
1
24 (1.4) 3(1.47)
17
4 20 10
y5 1.47
x 5 1.40 z5 1.82
6 3 5 1 8.3 1
1 3 2 0 1.1 0.2
AX2= 4 4 1 = 5.9 5.9 X
0.3 0.2 0 3
1 5.9 1
6 3 5
1 3 2 0.2 2.2 0.4
AX3= 4 4 1 = 6.2 6.2 X
0 0.2 0 4
6 3 5 1 6.2 1
1 3 2 0.4 2.4 0.3
AX4= 4 4 1 = 7.4 7.4 X
0 0.6 0.1 5
6 3 5 1 7.4 1
1 3 2 0.3 2.0 0.3
AX5= 4 4 1 = 7.1 7.1X
0.1 0.6 0.1 6
6 3 5 1 7.1 1
1 3 2 0.3 2.0 0.3
AX6= 4 4 1 = 7.1 7.1X
0.1 0.6 0.1 7
1 7.1 1
6 3 5
Find the dominant Eigenvalue and its corresponding Eigenvector for the matrix 3 2 4 using
5
1 4 10
1
Power method by taking X 0 1
1
Solution:
1
Let the initial eigenvector be X 0 1
1
Now
3
13
1 3 1 1 1 3 1 3 0.23
9
AX 0 3 2 4 1 3 2 4 9 13 13 0.69 13 X 1
13
1 4 10 1 1 4 10 13 1
13
13
1 3 1 0.23 1.30 0.10
AX 1 3 2 4 0.69 6.07 12.53 0.48 12.53 X 2
1 4 10 1 12.53 1
1 3 1 0.10 0.54 0.05
AX 2 3 2 4 0.48 5.26 11.82 0.45 11.82 X 3
1 4 10 1 11.82 1
1 3 1 0.05 0.40 0.03
AX 3 3 2 4 0.45 5.05 11.75 0.43 11.75 X 4
1 4 10 1 11.75 1
1 3 1 0.03 0.32 0.03
AX 4 3 2 4 0.43 4.95 11.69 0.42 11.69 X 5
1 4 10 1 11.69 1
1 3 1 0.03 0.29 0.02
AX 5 3 2 4 0.42 4.93 11.65 0.42 11.65 X 6
1 4 10 1 11.65 1
1 3 1 0.02 0.28 0.02
AX 6 3 2 4 0.42 4.90 11.66 0.42 11.66 X 7
1 4 10 1 11.66 1
0 0 3 0 0 0
The last successive eigen vectors are equal, stop the process. Hence eigen dominant eigen value is 4 and the
1
corresponding eigen vector is 0.5
0