Privacy-Preserving Data Analysis - A Survey
Privacy-Preserving Data Analysis - A Survey
org © 2024 IJCRT | Volume 12, Issue 5 May 2024 | ISSN: 2320-2882
Prof.Hetal Rana
Assistant Professor, MVJ College of Engineering, Bangalore, India
Abstract:
Privacy-preserving data analysis has emerged as a crucial area of research in response to the increasing
concerns about the privacy of sensitive information in data-driven applications. This paper presents a
comprehensive survey of techniques and methodologies in privacy-preserving data analysis. It covers
various approaches, including differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, secure multiparty computation,
and federated learning, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and applications. Additionally, we discuss
open challenges and future directions in the field.
Keywords: Privacy, Data Analysis, Differential Privacy, Homomorphic Encryption, Secure Multiparty
Computation, Federated Learning.
I. Introduction:
In the era of big data, the proliferation of data collection and analysis has raised significant concerns about
individual privacy. Organizations collect vast amounts of data from individuals, including personal,
financial, and health-related information, to derive valuable insights and improve decision-making
processes. However, the unauthorized disclosure or misuse of sensitive data can lead to severe consequences,
such as identity theft, financial fraud, and discrimination.
Privacy-preserving data analysis aims to enable organizations to extract valuable insights from data while
protecting the privacy of individuals. It encompasses a range of techniques and methodologies that allow
data analysis to be performed without revealing sensitive information. In this survey, we provide an
overview of various privacy-preserving techniques and their applications in data analysis.
Differential privacy is a rigorous privacy framework that provides strong privacy guarantees by ensuring
that the presence or absence of an individual's data does not significantly affect the outcome of the analysis.
It introduces randomness into the data analysis process to prevent adversaries from inferring sensitive
information about individuals. Differential privacy has been applied to various data analysis tasks, including
query answering, machine learning, and data publishing.
V. Federated Learning:
Federated learning, a novel paradigm in machine learning, revolutionizes the landscape of privacy-
preserving data analysis. Introduced by Google researchers in 2016, federated learning enables model
training across decentralized devices or servers while keeping raw data localized and private. By aggregating
model updates instead of raw data, federated learning mitigates privacy risks associated with centralized
data aggregation, making it particularly suitable for applications in sensitive domains like health-care and
finance.
Federated learning is a decentralized approach to machine learning where the model is trained across
multiple devices or servers holding local data samples, without exchanging them. It allows privacy-
preserving data analysis by ensuring that the raw data never leaves the local device, and only model updates
are shared with a central server. Federated learning has applications in various domains, including health-
care, finance, and telecommunications.
VII. Conclusion:
Privacy-preserving data analysis plays a crucial role in ensuring the privacy and security of sensitive
information in data-driven applications. In this survey, we have provided an overview of various privacy-
preserving techniques and their applications in data analysis. While significant progress has been made in
the field, there remain several challenges and open research directions that warrant further investigation. By
References:
[1] Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and
Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3-4), 211-407.
[2] Gentry, C. (2009). A fully homomorphic encryption scheme. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
[3] Yao, A. C. (1982). Protocols for secure computations. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual IEEE
Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (pp. 160-164). IEEE.
[4] Konečný, J., McMahan, H. B., Yu, F. X., Richtárik, P., Suresh, A. T., & Bacon, D. (2016). Federated
learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492.
[5] Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016).
Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer
and Communications Security (pp. 308-318). ACM.
[6] Boneh, D., & Shacham, H. (2004). Group signatures with verifier-local revocation. In Proceedings of
the 11th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 168-177). ACM.
[7] Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., ... & Song, D. (2019).
Advances and open problems in federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04977.
[8] Lauter, K., López-Alt, A., & Naehrig, M. (2011). Private computation on encrypted genomic data. In
Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Workshop on Cloud computing security (pp. 33-44). ACM.
[9] Mohassel, P., & Zhang, Y. (2017). SecureML: A system for scalable privacy-preserving machine
learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications
Security (pp. 703-720). ACM.
[10] Shokri, R., & Shmatikov, V. (2015). Privacy-preserving deep learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd
ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 1310-1321). ACM.