Department of Water Resources

Government of Odisha

Construction Of Concrete Gravity Dam And Spillway

(Superstructure) with its accessories and appurtenant
including energy dissipation arrangement, piers and
abutment, head regulator, penstock of powerhouse,
construction sluice, drainage and inspection gallery, all
mechanical gate work, electrical work with power
connectivity from existing Sub-Station(2x250KVA),
watchman cum operator shed, instrumentation,
NAME OF WORK : construction of internal road, beautification of dam site
including survey, planning, design and estimate of all
components with operation and maintenance of the
project for a period of five years or five flood seasons
whichever is more of Hadua Irrigation Project across
River Hadua near village Kharod of Baramba block in
Cuttack District of State of Odisha after successful
commissioning of the Project.
REFERENCE TO AB Agreement No. EPC-01/2022-23, Dated 23-12-2022.

DESIGN AND DRAWINGS OF SPILLWAY CREST , BUCKET,

INTERMEDIATE PIER, END PIER, RIVER SLUICES, WNIG WALLS

SUBMITTED TO :
SUBMITTED BY :
The Superintending Engineer,
Hadua Irrigation Division, Narasinghpur,
M/S PES –BEKEM (JV) Cuttack Dist, Odisha.
.
 WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
(GOVERNMENT OF ODISHA)

PROJECT: HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT

CONTRACTOR PES-BEKEM (JV)

HYDERABAD

CONSULTANT: M/s RAJ E TECH

HYDERABAD

DESIGN DESIGN OF CREST REINFORCEMENT

DOCUMENT NO: BKM/HADUA/CREST/01

REVISION NO: R0

1
 RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF CREST REINFORCEMENT HYDERABAD

HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT

DESIGN OF SPILLWAY CREST REINFORCEMENT (Without Gates): @114 m Level

CREST REINFORCEMENT CALACULATIONS

Salient Features
+126.000 m
M.W.L - +126.000 m
F.R.L #REF! m
M.D.D.L - +92.200 m
Max. T.W.L - +86.500 m
Min. T.W.L - +85.617 m
Deepest foundation level - +129.800 m
Top of Dam road level - +117.416 m
U/s change point +111.067 m
D/s change point - 0.150 :1
U/S slope - 0.800 :1
D/S slope
3.800 m
Free board for Non Over Flow above HFL 6.600 m
Top width of NOF 1.50 x 2.50 m.
Size of Gallery
32.732 M.Cum
Live storage 0.415 M.Cum
Dead storage (Silt)

Design Data :
2
Value of 'c' of the foundation 50.00 t/m Cohesion over rock
Value of 'ø' of the foundation 45.00 deg Angle of internal friction over rock

Seismic Zone - III

Earth Quake coefficient 0.040
Importance factor 3

Density of Concrete 2.400 t/m3 M10, M15, M20, M25

Density of Water 1.000 t/m3
Density of Silt (H) 0.360 t/m3
Density of Silt (V) 0.925 t/m3
Uplift 100 %

Wind velocity at FRL 120 kmph

Wind velocity at HFL 80 kmph
Fetch (FRL) assumed 2.000
Fetch (MWL) assumed 2.500

2
 RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF CREST REINFORCEMENT HYDERABAD

OVER FLOW SECTION

Structure (SPILLWAY)

Spillway Axis

Bridge Axis
Dam Axis
3.900 2.10 0.600 3.40 5.700 2.507
+131.000
0.60 6.000
ROAD-TOP Top of Gate +130.440
+129.800 6.600
+127.800
1.50 P6 P7
4.000 ↓ ↓ 3.50
MFL P2b P3b P5 +121.940
+126.000 FRL P1b ↓ ↓ ↓ Trunion Level +120.440
+126.000 3.416 1.74 10.261 P8 +119.140
CREST 2.00 ↓ P9↓ +118.000
+118.000 0.584 P3a B2a +117.663 P4 P10↓ +117.000
+117.416 P2a A ↓ 2.50 1.00
2.000 6.933 P11
3.416 12.001 B3 ↓
+114.000 1.50 P1a B2c B2b ↓ 4.446
2.933 B2d +111.067
15.417 B D/S TPT

D/S SLOPE
0.80

1
U/S SLOPE P12
0.150 ↓

1 B5 +105.509
B4 ↓
+95.400 LWL/MDDL ↓ +92.200 LWL/MDDL
+92.200 Max. TWL 1.50 B6
+93.694 GL/Silt B1 4.900 DG 2.50 ↓
+90.500 ↓ ↓
+88.000 Min. TWL +86.500 Min. TWL
+86.500 +86.000
+85.617 +85.617

Foundation level 4.26 5.16 10.261 20.360

40.034

3
 RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF CREST REINFORCEMENT HYDERABAD

Codes & Standards

Design Standards

The design of spillway, in general is based on provisions of the following IS Codes.

Wherever IS code is silent, reference is made to other Indian/International codes and standards.

LIST OF BIS STANDARDS

1. IS: 6512 - 1984 (REAFFIRMED 1998) CRITERIA FOR DESIGN OF SOLID GRAVITY DAMS

2. IS: 6934 - 1998 (REAFFIRMED 2003) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF

HIGH OGEE OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS
3. IS: 7365 - 2010 CRITERIA FOR HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF BUCKET TYPE
ENERGY DISSIPATORS
4. IS: 10135 - 1985 (REAFFIRMED 2002) CODE OF PRACTICE FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM FOR
GRAVITY DAMS THEIR FOUNDATIONS AND
ABUTMENTS
5. IS: 10137 - 1982 (REAFFIRMED 2004) GUIDELINES FOR SELECTION OF SPILLWAYS
AND ENERGY DISSIPATORS.
6. IS: 11155- 1994 (REAFFIRMED 2004) CONSTRUCTION OF SPILLWAYS AND SIMILAR
OVERFLOW STRUCTURES - CODE OF PRACTICE
7. IS: 1893 - 1984 (REAFFIRMED 2003) CRITERIA FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN
OF STRUCTURES
8. IS: 11293(PART2) -1993 GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF GROUT CURTAINS

9. IS: 11527 - 1985 CRITERIA FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF ENERGY

DISSIPATORS FOR SPILLWAYS
10. IS: 11772 - 2009 DESIGN OF DRAINAGE ARRANGEMENTS OF ENERGY
DISSIPATORS AND TRAINING WALLS OF
SPILLWAYS - GUIDELINES
11. IS: 6066 - 1994 (REAFFIRMED 2004) PRESSURE GROUTING OF ROCK FOUNDATIONS
IN RIVER VALLEY PROJECTS
12. IS: 1893 - (PART 1): 2002 CRITERIA FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN
OF STRUCTURES (PART 1) GENERAL PROVISIONS
AND BUILDINGS
13. IS: 12966 (PART1) - 1992 CODE OF PRACTICE FOR GALLERIES AND OTHER
(REAFFIRMED 2002) OPENINGS IN DAMS, PART 1:GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
14. IS: 12966 (PART2) - 1990 CODE OF PRACTICE FOR GALLERIES AND OTHER
(REAFFIRMED 2002) OPENINGS IN DAMS, PART 2: STRUCTURAL DESIGN
15. IS: 13511-1992 (REAFFIRMED 2003) STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF SPILLWAY PIER AND CREST -
CRITERIA
16. IS: 4623:2000 (REAFFIRMED 2004) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF
RADIAL GATES
17. TEXT BOOK BY PANDE Design of members subjected to Direct tension
and bending

4
 RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF CREST REINFORCEMENT HYDERABAD

U/S Slope( 1H : mV) = 6.667 81

D/S Slope( mH : 1V) = 0.80 39
Vent Size = 10.00 X 8.000
Block Length = 26.00 x y
Gate Sill Below Crest = 0.337 2.500 0.5
x y 3.000 0.7
2.684 0.584 2.684 0.584

STABILITY OF SPILLWAY WITH WATER AND WITHOUT GATES: @ 117.416 m Level

Taking moments about 'A'
S.NO Force Details Magnitude 't' L.A 'm' Moment ' tm'
2 B2a 2/3 1.74 0.584 2.40 1.626 2.580 4.195
5 B3 2/3 2.000 0.584 2.40 1.869 1.333 2.492
6 W1 1/3 1.740 0.584 1.00 0.339 3.160 1.070
7 U 1/2 3.740 8.000 1.00 -14.960 2.493 -37.300
8 P1 8.000 0.584 1.00 4.672 0.292 -1.364
9 P2 1/2 0.58 0.584 1.00 0.171 0.195 -0.033
Total -11.127 -30.941
3.740

+126.000
U

8.000 +118.000

P2 P1 0.584

0.584 8.000
Base Width = 3.740 m

V= -11.13 T tM = -30.94
= tm

L.A = -30.94 = 2.781 m

-11.13

Eccentricity 'e' = 3.740 - 2.781 = 0.911

2
Eccentric limit = B = 3.740 = 0.623 tension develops
6 6

2
U/S Stress = -11.127 1 + 6 x 0.911 = -7.322 t/m
3.740 3.740 (Heel)

2
D/S Stress = -11.127 1 - 6 x 0.911 = 1.372 t/m
3.740 3.740 (Toe)

7.322
X 3.74 - X
=
7.322 1.372 3.740
X 1.372
X = 3.150 m

Total Tension (T) = 11.532 t

Ast = T/(1.84 ) = 6.267 cm2

5
 RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF CREST REINFORCEMENT HYDERABAD

T1 T T2

As1 As2
0.2 d1 = 3.580
d = 3.740

Check:
T1 = ((d1 - d/2 + e)/(2 x d1 - d)) x T = 2.532 t
T2 = ((d1 - d/2 - e)/(2 x d1 - d)) x T = -3.610 t

Where,
d = 3.740 m d1 = 3.74 - 0.16 = 3.580 m
( d1 = d - dc ) dc = 0.15 + 0.2/2 = 0.160 m

Steel is provided parallel to the faces.

q = Slope of the U/S face with vertical = Tan -1 ( 1 /6.667) = 8.530
90 - a = Slope of the D/S face with vertical
As per Cl. 4.1.3.2 of IS : 6934 - 1998, The profile Equation for D/S Ogee is
DownStream Profile Xn = K x Hd(n-1) x Y
Where, n = 1.85 K = 2.04 Hd = = 8.000 m
Y = X ^ 1.850 / (2.04 x 8 ^ (1.850 - 1))

Tan a = dy/dx = 1.85 x 1.74 ^ 0.85 = 0.248

11.947
q = 13.926
90 - a = 76.074

Ast1 = T1/(1.84 x Cos (8.53)) = 1.391 cm2

Ast2 = T2/(1.84 x Cos (76.074)) = -8.153 cm2
Max Reinforcement (Ast) = 1.391 cm2

Minimum Reinforcement, #16 @ 25 cm C/C as per Cl 4.5.4 of IS 13551 : 1992

Minimum Reinforcement = 8.046 cm2
Hence, Minimum Reinforcement required = 8.046 cm2

Main Reinforcement:
Provide 16 mm bars @ 240 mm c/c
Steel provided= 8.38 cm2 > 8.046 cm2 O.K

Distribution Reinforcement: 20% of Main Reinforcement

Reinforcement required = 1.676 cm2
Minimum Reinforcement, #16 @ 25 cm C/C as per Cl 4.5.4 of IS 13551 : 1992
Minimum Reinforcement = 8.046 cm2
Hence, Minimum Reinforcement required = 8.046 cm2
Provide 16 mm bars @ 240 mm c/c
Steel provided= 8.38 cm2 > 8.046 cm2 O.K

6
 RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF CREST REINFORCEMENT HYDERABAD

DESIGN OF SPILLWAY CREST REINFORCEMENT (With Gates): @ 111.067 m Level

STABILITY OF SPILLWAY WITH WATER AND GATES: @ 111.067 m Level

Taking Moments about point B

Taking moments about 'A'

S.NO Force Details Magnitude 't' L.A 'm' Moment ' tm'
1 B2a 2/3 1.74 0.584 2.40 1.626 10.841 17.626
2 B2b 1.74 3.416 2.40 14.265 11.131 158.786
3 B2c 1/2 3.416 3.416 2.40 14.003 13.140 183.993
4 B2d 5.156 2.933 2.40 36.294 12.839 465.980
5 B3 2/3 10.261 6.933 2.40 113.823 6.841 778.627
6 Gate 2.675 8.261 22.100
7 W1 1/3 1.740 0.584 1.00 0.339 11.421 3.869
8 W2 3.416 0.584 1.00 1.995 13.709 27.349
9 W3 1/2 3.416 3.416 1.00 5.835 14.278 83.307
10 W4 5.16 8.00 1.00 41.25 12.839 529.583
11 U 1/2 15.417 14.933 1.00 -115.11 10.278 -1183.111
P2 1/2 14.933 14.933 1.00 -111.50 4.978 -554.996
Total 116.992 533.112

L.A of Resultant X = 533.11 = 4.557 m

116.992
3 Radial Gate :
Weight of Radial Gate
1.9 1.35
Wg = K L H
where k= 0.025
L= 10.000 m
H= 8.337 m =

1.9
= 0.025 x 10.0 ^ x 8.337 ^1.35

= 0.025 x 79 x 17.513 = 34.778 t

Weight per meter length = 34.778 = 2.675 t

13
15.417

+126.000
U

14.933

P1 14.933
+111.067
14.933
Base Width = 15.417 m

V= 116.99 T tM = 533.11
= tm

L.A = 533.11 = 4.557 m

116.99

Eccentricity 'e' = 15.417 - 4.557 = 3.152

2

7
 RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF CREST REINFORCEMENT HYDERABAD

Eccentric limit = B = 15.417 = 2.570 tension develops

6 6

U/S Stress = 116.992 1 + 6 x 3.152

15.417 15.417

= 16.896 t/m2 (Heel)

D/S Stress = 116.992 1 - 6 x 3.152

15.417 15.417

= -1.719 t/m2 (Toe)

1.719
X 15.417 - X
=
1.719 16.896 15.417
X 16.896
X = 1.424 m

Total Tension (T) = 1.224 t

Ast = T/(1.84 ) = 0.665 cm2

Minimum Reinforcement, #16 @ 25 cm C/C as per Cl 4.5.4 of IS 13551 : 1992

Minimum Reinforcement = 8.046 cm2
Hence, Minimum Reinforcement required = 8.046 cm2

Main Reinforcement:
Provide 16 mm bars @ 240 mm c/c in two tiers
2
Steel provided= 8.381 cm > 8.046 cm2 O.K

Distribution Reinforcement: 20% of Main Reinforcement

Reinforcement required = 1.676 cm2
Minimum Reinforcement, #16 @ 25 cm C/C as per Cl 4.5.4 of IS 13551 : 1992
Minimum Reinforcement = 8.046 cm2
Hence, Minimum Reinforcement required = 8.046 cm2
Provide 16 mm bars @ 240 mm c/c
2
Steel provided= 8.381 cm > 8.046 cm2 O.K

8
 HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT
DESIGN OF CREST REINFORCEMENT
REFERENCES:
1.Design of Hydraulic structures with HYM bars by G N Pande & R CHANDRA
2. IS:13551-1992

DESIGN OF CREST REINFORCEMENT

Crest Level = 118.000
FRL = 128.000
D/s slope of the Spillway = 0.800
Design Head Hd = 10.000 m
Crest under design Factor (F) = actual head / design head
= 10/10 1
Crest Lvl 118
U/s TPT 117.416
111.067 D/S TPT
114

85.617

Elevation of Section Z-Z = 0.126 x Hd

= 1.26 m Below the Crest
From chart 1.1, the value of area of steel (Ast) = 16 (Ast = 16 cm2/m)
Spacing between bars= 126
Providing 16 mm f @ 100 mm. c/c
The diameter of the bars & spacing is 16 mm dia bars @ 100 mm c/c

Curtailment of alternate bars:

For the known Hd and F, find L1/Hd from chart 1.2 , L1 / Hd by Hd to obtain
the depth at which the spacing of the crest reinforcement can be doubled i.e.
alternate bars can be curtailed.

Design Head Hd = 10.000 m

Crest under design Factor (F) = 1.000
L 1 / Hd = 0.350
L 1 = 3.500 m
Upto 3.5 m below crest, 16 mm dia @ 100 c/c and beyond 3.1 m 16 mm dia @ 200 c/c is provided

Curtailment of crest reinforcement on U/s & D/s side:

For the known D/s slope (S), F and Hd find L/Hd from chart 1.30
S = 0.800
F = 1.000
Hd = 10.000
L / Hd = 1.100 From Chart 1.30
Depth below creast in meters at which the creast stel can be stopped L = 11 m
The steel can be stopped at below crest on U/s side i.e 107.000
On d/s side, the steel can be taken upto the Bucket Bottom/Spillway Foundation Level

Distribution steel:
The distribution steel shall be minimum 20% of main reinforcement
Ast = 3.2 cm2/m.run
Spacing between bars= 353
Providing 12 mm f @ 300 mm. c/c
 WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

(GOVERNMENT OF ODISHA)

PROJECT: HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT

CONTRACTOR PES-BEKEM (JV)

HYDERABAD

CONSULTANT: M/s RAJ E TECH

HYDERABAD

DESIGN DESIGN OF SPILLWAY BUCKET

AT EL 88.000M WITH 14.520M RADIUS

DOCUMENT NO: BKM/HADUA/BUCKET/01

REVISION NO: R2

0
RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF SPILLWAY BUCKET HYDERABAD

Hauda Spillway Energy Dissipators

(Ref: IS 7365 : 2010- CRITERIA FOR HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF BUCKET TYPE ENERGY DISSIPATORS)

Design discharge, Q = 1725.00 cumecs

Width of Bucket L = 62.000 m
Maximum water level = 126.000 m
Crest level = 118.000 m
Maximum Tall Water Level = 92.2 m
Assume down stream retrogation = 1.000 m
Assume (Bucket invert / Apron) Level = 88.000 m
D/S Approach level = 88.000 m

Discharge intensity, q 1725.00 / 62.000 = 27.822581 cumecs

Reservior Pool Level - Crest Level, H 126.000 - 118.000 = 8.000 m

Reservior Pool Level - Bcuket invert Level, H1 126.000 - 88.000 = 38.000 m
Crest Level - Bucket invert Level, H2 118.000 - 88.000 = 30.000 m
Reservior Pool Level - Tall Water Level, H3 126.000 - 92.2 = 33.800 m
Tall water Level - Bucket Invert Level, d3 92.2 - 88.000 = 4.200 m

Discharge Equation:-
Q = Cd (L - 0.26 H) x H3/2
Where, Cd = 2.185 From Hydraulic design
V1 = Sqrt (2 g H1)
F1 = V1/Sqrt (gd1)
d2 = (d1/2)*(sqrt(1+8F12)-1)

SI Dis Req. Q H Cal.Q Pool level TWL Restrogated Ha V1 Va/V1

No % cumecs m Cumecs m m. TWL m. m/sec fig.7
1 25 431.25 2.18 431.25 120.177 89.800 88.800 31.377 24.812 0.94
2 50 862.50 3.47 862.50 121.469 91.110 90.110 31.359 24.804 0.93
3 75 1293.75 4.56 1293.75 122.560 92.250 91.250 31.310 24.785 0.93
4 100 1725.00 5.54 1725.00 123.539 93.244 92.244 31.295 24.779 0.92

2
Va Va2/2g q d1 = q/Va d1+Va /2g F1 d2 d3 d3/d2
m/sec m cumecs/m m m m
23.323 27.725 6.956 0.298 28.023 13.636 5.604 0.800 0.143
23.068 27.122 13.911 0.603 27.725 9.484 7.793 2.110 0.271
23.050 27.080 20.867 0.905 27.985 7.735 9.460 3.250 0.344
22.797 26.488 27.823 1.220 27.709 6.588 10.778 4.244 0.394

CHOICE :- Ski Jump Bucket Type Energy Dissipation Device may be adopted.

1
RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF SPILLWAY BUCKET HYDERABAD

Tall Water Discharge

Q 1725 cumecs
% Qobs TWLobs Qact TWLact
0 0.000 87.500 0.000
25 431.250 89.800 431.250 89.800
50 862.500 91.110 862.500 91.110
75 1293.750 92.250 1293.750 92.250
100 1725.000 93.244 1725.000 93.244

Hauda Spillway
Design of Trajectory (Ski - Jump) Bucket

Design discharge, Q = 1725.000 cumecs

Width of Bucket = 62.000 m
Maximum water level = 126.000 m
Crest level = 118.000 m
Maximum Tall Water Level = 92.200 m
Down stream Rock Level = 87.000 m
Fix the Bucket Invert Level = 88.000 m

Va = 22.797 m/sec d1 = 1.220 m

F1 = 6.588 d2 = 10.778 m

Discharge intensity,
q = 1725.000 / 62.000 = 27.823 cumecs

Jet surface elevation level = 88.000 + 1.220 = 89.220 m

Reservior Pool Level - Crest Level, H = 126.000 - 118.000 = 8.000 m
Reservior Pool Level - Bucket Invert Level, H1 = 126.000 - 88.000 = 38.000 m
Crest Level - Bucket Invert Level, H2 = 118.000 - 88.000 = 30.000 m
Reservior Pool Level - Tall Water Level, H3 = 126.000 - 92.200 = 33.800 m
Res. Pool Level - Jet surface elevation Lvl, H5 = 126.000 - 89.220 = 36.780 m
Tall Water Level - Bucket Invert Level, d3 = 92.200 - 88.000 = 4.200 m

Bucket Shape
Circular Trajectory Bucet shape has been used.

Bucket Invert Elevation

The bucket invert level has been fixed at RL 88.000 m

Which is 1.00 m . above the hard rock level

d2 = 10.778
d3 = 4.200 m
Submergence % is 100*d3/d2 = 38.970 % which is less than 70.00 %
Hence O.K.

2
RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF SPILLWAY BUCKET HYDERABAD

Bucket Radius
a) Minimum is Three times d1 = 3.000 x 1.220 = 3.661 m

b) 0.60 x sqrt (H x Hs) = 0.60 x sqrt ( 8 x 36.78) = 10.292 m

c) 0.80 x sqrt (H x Hs) = 0.80 x sqrt ( 8 x 36.78) = 13.155 m

Fix the bucket radius = 14.520 m

RL of Bucket centre = 88.000 + 14.520 = 102.520 m

Leap angle
Required minimum Leap angle = 30 degree
Required maximum Leap angle = 40 degree
Fix the leap angle f = 35 degree

Leap height = R - R cosf = 14.520 - 11.896 = 2.624 m

Leap elevation = 88.000 + 2.624 = 90.624 m

Leap shape
Tail water level is higher than the Leap level

Bucket Radius adopted = 14.520 m

Minimum Leap width required = 1.452 m
Fix the leap width = 1.500 m
Provide a leap slope down stream about = 1 in 10

Actual Head of over flow, H = 8.000 m (Velocity of Approach' is not considered)

Design head adopted, Hd = 8.000 m

H/Hd = 8.000 / 8.000 = 1.000 m

Corresponding value of C/Co = 1

Corrected coefficient, C = 2.185 x 1.000 = 2.185 m

Effect of Upstream Slope

Spillway crest above approach level = 30.000
Design adopted , Hd = 8.000
P/Hd = 30.000 / 8.000 = 3.750

Up stream slope adopted = 6.67 on 1 (1V : 0.15 H)

Correspoding value of Ci/Cv = 0.74
Corrected coeffcicent , C = 2.185

3
RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF SPILLWAY BUCKET HYDERABAD

Effect of down stream apron

Up stream MWL = 126.000 m
Tail water level = 92.200 m
Down stream apron level = 87.000 m
Crest level = 118.000 m
Velocity head = 0.051 m From Hydraulic design
Up stream Total Energy Le126 + 0.053 = 126.000 + 0.051 = 126.051 m
d = 92.200 - 87.000 = 5.200 m
hd = 126.051 - 92.200 = 33.851 m
Hd = 126.051 - 118.000 = 8.051 m
d+hd = 5.200 + 33.851 = 39.051 m
(d+hd)/Hd = 39.051 / 8.051 = 4.850
(as more than 0.70, No effect)

Corresponding value of Cs/C = 1.000

Corrected coefficient, Cs = 2.185 x 1.000 = 2.185

Effect of down stream submergance

hd = 33.851
Hd = 8.051
hd/Hd = 33.851 / 8.051 = 4.205

Corresponding value of Cs/C = 1.000

Corrected coefficient, Cs = 2.185 x 1.000 = 2.185

Effective length of over flow crest

Net length of overflow crest, L = 50.000 m
Head at maximum water level, H = 8.000 m
No. of effective piers, N = 4 Nos
Assume, Pier contraction coeffecient = 0.010
Abutment contraction coeffecient, I = 0.100
Effective length of crest is given by L = L'-2(NKp + Ka) H
= L' -2(4x0.01 + 0.1) H
= 50.000 - 0.280 H= 47.760 m
Effective discharge
Rating curve equation of spilway is given by :-
Q = Cd (40-0.26H)H
Cd = 2.185
L = 47.760
H = 8
Discharge over the spillway, Q = Cd. L. H3/2
= 2361.30 cumes
As against the design discharge of = 1725.00 cumes

4
RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF SPILLWAY BUCKET HYDERABAD

Trajectory Length
The following expression is used for calculating the throw distance.
= Sin2f +2 cosf * sqrt (sin f + Y/Hv)
2
X/Hv
Where,
X = Horizontal throw distance from bucket lip to the centre point of impact with tall water.
Y = Difference between the lip level and tall water level (Taken positive for tall water level
below the lip level & negative for tall water level above the lip level)
Hv = Velocity head of the het at the bucket lip.
f = Bucket lip angle with horizontal.
= Sin2f +2 cosf * sqrt (sin f + Y/Hv) * Hv
2
X
Y = 3.890 m
Hv = 32.380 m
f = 35 degree
X = 54.243 m

Vertical Throw Height

The following expression is used for calculating vertical distances of throw above the lip level.

= Va sin f/2g
2 2
a
Where,
a = Vertical distance from the lip level to the heighest point of the centre of the jet.
Actual velocity of flow entering the bucket, Va = 22.797 m/sec
Bucket lip angle with horizontal, f = 34.99 degrees
Acceleration due to gravity, g = 9.81 m/sec2
a = 8.710 m

Scour Depth
Depth of scour, ds = m (q H4)^0.5
Reservior Pool Level - Bucket end sill elevation, H4
= 126.000 - 90.624 = 35.376 m
Discharge intensity, q = 27.823 cumecs

Constant, m = 0.36 (for miimum excepted scour)

0.54 (for probable scour under sustained spillway opn)
0.65 (for ultimate scour)

For minimum excepted scour, ds = 11.294 m

For probable scour,ds = 16.941 m
For ultimate scour,ds = 20.392 m

Depth of probable scour, ds = 1.9 * H30.225 * q0.54

= 25.600 m
Cut off may be provided considering rock quality.

5
RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF SPILLWAY BUCKET HYDERABAD

Hydraulic Pressure
Hydraulic pressure acting on bucket, P = (Va2/gR+1)gd1

Where,
Actual velocity of flow entering the bucket, Va = 22.797 m/sec
Acceleration due to gravity, g = 9.81 m/sec2
Bucket Radius adopted, R = 14.520 m
Unit weight of water,g = 1.000 t/m3
Depth of flow entering bucket,d1 = 1.220 m
P = 5.673 t/m2

Free board
Free board = 0.61 + 0.0371 *Va*d10.333
= 1.514 m
Provide free board = 2.000 m

6
RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF SPILLWAY BUCKET HYDERABAD

Structural design of Bucket

For M25 concrete & Fe415 steel

S cbc = 8.5 N/mm2 85 Kg/cm2

s st = 150 N/mm2 1500 Kg/cm2
m = 2800/3*s cbc = 10.98

k = 1/(1+(s st/m*s cbc))= 0.384

j = 1-k/3 = 0.872
Q = 1/2*k*j*s cbc = 14.22

Total horizontal force on the lip, F = W*b*V*(1-cosf)/g

Where'
Unit weight of water, W = 1.000 t/m3
Width of lip,b = 1.000 m
Velocity of flow, V = 22.797 m/sec
F = 0.420 ton

Moment of the horizontal force, M = F*R*(1-cosf)/2

= 0.551 ton.m

Effective depth for resisting moment (M),d = sqrt(R2+(Rsinf+tw)2)-R-effective cover

= 2.687 m

Area of steel to resist moment, Ast = B.M = 0.157 cm2

sst*j*d

Providing 20 mm f bars spacing required = 20037 mm c/c.

Adopt 20 mm f @ bars spacing at 240 mm c/c.

Providing Distribution steel = 20 % of main steel 0.031 cm2

Providing 16 mm f bars spacing required = 64119 mm/cc

Adopt 16 mm f @ bars spacing at 240 mm c/c.

Anchorage of Spillway Bucket

Providing 25 mm f anchor bars @ 1.5 meter c/c. (Staggered)

Inserted 3.0 m into hard rock.

7
 WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
(GOVERNMENT OF ODISHA)

PROJECT: HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT

CONTRACTOR PES-BEKEM (JV)

HYDERABAD

CONSULTANT: M/s RAJ E TECH

HYDERABAD

DESIGN RIVER SLUICE DESIGN

DOCUMENT NO: BKM/HADUA/RS/01

REVISION NO: R0

0
RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF RIVER SLUICE HYDERABAD

HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF RIVER SLUICE IN SPILLWAY PIER

Ref: IS:11485-1985 – Criteria for Hydraulic design of sluices in concrete and masonry dams.

Introduction:
Sluices are provided in the body of the dam to release regulated supplies of water for a variety of purposes
such as river diversion, Irrigation, water supply for municipal & industrial uses etc. In the present case, the
sluice is provided in the Spillway pier(Refer cl.3.5.2 0f IS: 11485 - 1985)
Reservoir standards:
1. T.B.L. = + 129.80 M
2. M.W.L. = + 126.00 M
3. F.R.L. = + 126.00 M
4. M.D.D.L. = + 95.40 M
5. Deepest foundation level = + 84.00 M
6. Sill level of sluice = + 93.00 M
7. Number of sluices = 1
8. Size of sluice = 1 m x 1.5 m

Size of sluice:
As per clause 3.2 of 11485-1985, the shape of sluice is normally kept rectangular. Hence the sluice size is
provided as 1 m X 1.5 m.

Sill level of sluice:

Sill levell of the sluice is kept at 93 m keeping in view the MDDL: 95.4 M and 1/3rd height of the bodywall above
the ground level is going to be siltedup.

Discharge through sluice: ( as per IS: 11485 - 1985, P -6)

Discharge through sluice under pressured flow can be estimated by the formula
HT = KL V2 / 2 g
Where
HT = Total head needed to overcome various head losses to
deliver the required discharge.
KL = Constant, which is obtained after considering all the losses in
the system.
V = Velocity in the portion of the sluice where the cross sectional
area a

1
RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF RIVER SLUICE HYDERABAD

At MDDL + 95.4 Discharge through the sluice:

Sill level of sluice = + 93.00 M
Top level of sluice = + 94.50 M
M.D.D.L. = + 95.40 M
\ Driving head at MDDL = 95.4 - 94.5
= 0.90 m
V2 / 2g = 0.90 m
\V = SQRT( 0.9 * 2 * 9.81)
= 4.20 m/sec
Discharge throgh each vent = Area x Velocity
= 1 * 1.5 * 4.2
3
= 6.303 m /sec
Total Discharge throgh River sluices = 1 * 6.303
3
= 6.303 m /sec

At FRL + 126 Discharge through the sluice:

Sill level of sluice = + 93.00 M
Top level of sluice = + 94.50 M
FRL = + 126.00 M
\ Driving head at MDDL = 126 - 94.5
= 31.50 m
V2 / 2g = 31.50 m
\V = SQRT( 31.5 * 2 * 9.81)
= 24.86 m/sec
Discharge throgh each vent = Area x Velocity
= 1 * 1.5 * 24.86
3
= 37.290 m /sec
Total Discharge throgh River sluices = 1 * 37.29
3
= 37.290 m /sec
Alternatively,
As per cl.3.1.2.1 of IS:11485-1985, Q
= 2/3 Ö2g C L (H13/2 – H23/2)
L = Width of sluice
= 1.00 m
C = 0.63 (table 1)
H1 = 126 - 93
= 33.000 m
H2 = 126 - 94.5
= 31.50 m
\Q = 2/3 * SQRT(2 * 9.81) * 0.63 * 1 * ( 33 ^ (3/2) - 31.5 ^ (3/2))
= 23.770 Cumecs
Total Discharge throgh River sluices = 1 * 23.77
3
= 23.770 m /sec

2
RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF RIVER SLUICE HYDERABAD

Bell mouth Entry Transitions:

The effective functioning of a sluice depends to a great extent on the design of its entry transitions. A bell
mouth entrance is hence provided.

i. Top curve:
For rectangular sluice, as per cl 3.3.2 the equation for top contraction curve is defined as
1.5
2 2 2 2
(X / D ) + (Y / 0.33D ) = 1 X 0.500 m
where D is the vertical height of sluice
0.33 D = 1/3 * 1.5 Y
= 0.500 m
For x = 0.0; y = 0.5

Equations: Sl.No. X in ‘m’ Y in ‘m’

( X ^ 2 / 1.5 ^ 2 ) + ( Y ^ 2 / 0.5 ^ 2 ) = 1 1 0.00 0.500
0.444 X ^ 2 + 4 Y ^ 2 = 1 2 0.25 0.493
3 0.50 0.471
Co-ordinates of top curves 4 0.75 0.433
( X ^ 2 / 1.5 ^ 2 ) + ( Y ^ 2 / 0.5 ^ 2 ) = 1 5 1.00 0.373
0.444 X ^ 2 + 4 Y ^ 2 = 1 6 1.25 0.276
Y = sqrt (( 1 - 0.444 X ^ 2) / 4) 7 1.50 0.000

ii. Side curve:

Equation of side curve = (x2 / D2) + (y2 / (0.33D)2) = 1

Where 1 X
D is the horizontal width of the sluice
D = 1.00 m Y 1 0.333
0.33D = 1/3 * 1
= 0.333 m
Equation is = ( x ^ 2 / 1 ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 / 0.33 ^ 2 ) = 1
= 1X^2+9Y^2=1

Sl.No. X in ‘m’ Y in ‘m’

Co-ordinates of side curves 1 0.00 0.333
( x ^ 2 / 1 ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 / 0.33 ^ 2 ) = 1 2 0.25 0.323
1X^2+9Y^2=1 3 0.50 0.289
Y = sqrt (( 1 - 1 X ^ 2) / 9) 4 0.75 0.220
5 1.00 0.000

3
RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF RIVER SLUICE HYDERABAD

Exit of the sluice:

Separate energy dissipation is not provided, since the sluice is provided in spillway pier (Refer Cl.3.4.4)

The exit of the sluice shall be tangential to the downstream face of the Spillway section. The sluice barrel is
kept horizontal for a distance of 5 m to accommodate the operation chamber and gallery.

0.8
1

Ymax

Xmax
X

width of U/S ogee profile i.e., X = 1.740 m

width of D/S ogee profile i.e., X = 10.261 m
Down stream T.P level = + 111.067 M
X = 1.74 + 10.261 + 0.8 * ( 111.067 - 90.879 )
= 28.15 m

As per cl. 2.1.2.1, the equation of bottom profile after the service gate shall be
X2 = K.H.y

Where,
K = Co-efficient: a value of about 4 is generally used depending
on the distance available to accommodate this curve in the
reach between service gate and downstream face of dam.
= 4
H = Head at the centre line of gate opening.
= 126 - 93.75
= 32.25 m
X1y = Co-ordinates of any point on the profile.

\ x2 = 4 * 32.25 * y
= 129 * y

at y = 93 - 90.88 Joining the curve with D/S Spillway profile till

= 2.12 m the curve fits.

x = sqrt ( 129 * y )
= 16.54
But avilable 'x' = 28.15 - 5
= 23.15 m

4
RAJ E TECH HADUA IRRIGATION PROJECT PES-BEKEM (JV)
HYDERABAD DESIGN OF RIVER SLUICE HYDERABAD

Hence the equation of the curve is recalculated duly incorporating the above restriction of horizontal distance.

X2 = K1y
23.15 ^ 2 = K1 * 2.12
K1 = 252.71
Say 252.7

\Equation of the bottom profile after the service gate shall be

x2 = 252.7 y

Co-ordinates of bottom profile

y= 2.12
2
X = 252.7 y
x= 23.15
Sl.No. Y in ‘m’ X in ‘m’
1 0.0 0.000
2 0.1 5.027
3 0.2 7.109
4 0.3 8.707
5 0.4 10.054
6 0.5 11.241
7 0.6 12.313 2.30 24.108
8 0.7 13.300 2.40 24.627
9 0.8 14.218 2.50 25.135
10 0.9 15.081 2.60 25.632
11 1.0 15.897 2.70 26.121
12 1.1 16.672 2.80 26.600
13 1.2 17.414 2.90 27.071
14 1.3 18.125 3.00 27.534
15 1.4 18.809 3.10 27.989
16 1.5 19.469 3.20 28.437
17 1.6 20.108
18 1.70 20.727
19 1.80 21.327
20 1.90 21.912
21 2.00 22.481
22 2.10 23.036
23 2.12 23.146

5
 Design reinforcement around River sluice

Refer Text book Hydro Power Structures

by R.S Vashney

Sluice size = 1.000 x 1.500 m

Centre line of elevation u.s. = 93.750 m
Sluice size on u/s face with bell mouthing = 1.667 x 2.500 m
Reservior elevation = 126.000 m

Solution
Design Criteria

1 Reinforcement around sluice will be located on the basis of U.S.B.R Tech.

Memorandum No. 457

2 The reinforcement will be worked out for an equivalent circular opening area equal to
the area of the sluice i.e. 1.000 x 1.500 = 1.500 Sq.m.
The reinforcement worked out will be increased by 30%
to account for redistribution to concentration at corners.

3 The downstream end sluice is designed as per standared pressure para 15.8.
(This part of design is not given below)

4 The reinforcement will be designed for the following cases.

I. (i) Stresses due to dam loads and hydrostatic pressure (ss)

(ii) Stresses due to internal pressure (p)

II. (i) Stresses due to dam loads and hydraustatic pressure sn

(ii) Stresses due to internal pressure (p)
(iii) Stresses due to temperature gradient

2
in case I, the stresses in steel will be taken as 11250 t/m
2
and under structural condition stresses equivalent to 14000 t/m
will be allowed. Greater of the reinforcemets will be provided.

5 Stresses in each case will be worked out under the following conditions of loading
(i) Reservior empty with no tail water, both horizontal and vertical earthquake acting.
(ii) Reservior at elevation 126.000 m gates closed,
no tail water, no uplift, both horizontal and vertical earthquake considered.
 Stress Relation -Derivations

1 Stresses due to orthogonal forces

𝜎𝑛 𝐷 𝜎 6𝐵 4𝐶
sr = 1 + 𝑅2 + 2𝑛 1 − 𝑅4 − 𝑅2 cos2θ
2
𝜎𝑛 𝐷 𝜎 6𝐵
sq = 2
1 + 𝑅2 + 2𝑛 1 − 𝑅2 cos2θ

trq = 𝜎𝑛 6𝐵 4𝐶
− 1 − 4 − 2 cos2θ
2 𝑅 𝑅

The consants B, C and D are given by

1−
B =
2a + 6
C = 1+
3+a

1−
D =
1+a
𝑎𝑐
a =
𝑛𝐴𝑠
where As = area of steel
n=Es/Ec = modulus of elasticity of steel
modulus of elasticiy of concrete
a = radius of equivalent circle
c = thickness of section 0.750 m

a= substituiting this value of a we have

B = 1/2 C=1 D=1

The stresses in concrete due to normal stress sn i.e. stress perpendicular to centre line
may be found by
sr = 0.5 1.5
s 0.5 + 2 +s 0.5 + 4 + 2 cos2θ
2
n 𝑅 n 𝑅 𝑅
0.5 1.5
sq = sn 0.5 + +sn 0.5 − cos2θ
𝑅2 𝑅4

trq = 1.5 1
−sn 0.5 − − sin2θ
𝑅4 𝑅 2
sq = sn 0.5 +
0.5
+sn 0.5 −
1.5
𝑅2 𝑅4

= 0.5 1.5
+
𝑅2 𝑅4
Integrating between the limits r = a and r=ac the latter limit being the point where =0 tension
= 𝑐 0.5 1.5 −0.5 0.5
a‫ 𝐼׬‬s𝑛 𝑅2 − 𝑅4 d R = 1. s𝑛 𝑅 + 𝑅3 𝑐 1
= 𝑎𝜎𝑛 1 1
−
2 𝑐3 𝑐
 2 𝑐 𝑐
sq = 0,
when c = 3

Hence total tension = 𝑎𝜎𝑛 1 1

−
2 3 3 3
= -0.2 sn.a

1 Stresses due to internal pressure p.

a
srp = P
1+ 𝑅2

−a
sqp = P
1+ 𝑅2

tqq = 0

Where R = r/a
P = internal pressure on edge of hole
a =

when As = 0,
a = 

𝑃
Hence sqp = -
𝑅2

Intergarting between limits R=1 and R=2, we have

2 𝑑𝑅
Tension
= a‫׬‬1 ⬚ − 2 𝑃 = −0.5p. a.
𝑅

Stresses due to temperature

𝑎−𝑐
sq.t = 2(2𝑎−𝑐)
EDt when r=a

3𝑎−𝑐
sq.t = EDt when r=c
2(2𝑎−𝑐)
𝑎−𝑐
sq.t = EDt when r=a
2 2𝑎−𝑐 𝑅2

𝑎−𝑐
srt = EDt when r=a
2 2𝑎−𝑐 𝑅2

tr,q,t = 0

where Dt = t2-t1
t2 = Temperature of concrete
t1 = Temprature of sluice water
c = distance from centre line of opening to the inner boundary of hole
at which the temprature is constant and equal to t1
= distance from centre line of circular opening to boundary outside which
temprature is assumed constant and equal to t2.
= Coefficient of expansion of concrete
E = modulus of elasticity of concrete.
The distribution of two normal and shear stress around sluice is shown in Fig.15.11.

illustration purpose only the reinforcement at the upstream face of the sluice calculated. The
procedure is exactly same for other sections of the dam.

Size of sluice at the upstream face is

Area of the sluice opening = 1.667 x 2.500 = 4.168 Sq.m.
Radius of equivalent circle. =
Sqrt( 4.168 / p) = 1.152 M

LOADING STRESSS
The following values of normal stresses have been actually calculated for different loading
conditions by standard garvity analysis.

Case I
Reservior empty, no tail water, horizontal earthquake force acting upstream and vertical
2
earthquake force acting down sn = 91.32 t/m
Case II
Reservior at elevation 126m, no tail water, horizontal earthquake force acting down,
2
uplift not considered sn = 72.31 t/m
Case III
Reservior at elevation 126m. No tail water, horizontal earthquake force acting upstream,
vertical earthquake force acting down, uplift considered.
2
sn = 68.56 t/m
Only stresses in case I and II will be considered, as stresses in case III are less.

Tension due to various loads (neglecting As)

Total tension due to loads on dam and hydrostatic pressure = 0.1923 sn a

a) When the reservior is empty, total tenison
= 0.1923 x 91.32 x 1.152 = 20.230 t

b) When the reservior is full, total tension

= 0.1923 x 72.31 x 1.152 = 16.019 t

Total tension due to internal pressure

2
P=wh = 1.00 x 32.250 = 32.250 t/m
h = 126.000 - 93.750 = 32.250 m
w = 1.00
Pe= Ca wz
C = -0.708 at sluice elevation
a = 0.250
z = 52.000 m
Pe = -0.708 x 0.25 x 1 x 52
= -9.204

P - Pe = 32.250 -9.204
2
= 23.046 t/m
 Tension = 0.5 x 23.046 x 1.152
= 13.274 t

Total tension due to temprature difference

Calculating the tension due to temprature, the temprature differential between water in
conduit and the final stable temprature of mass concrete has been assumed to be 3 degrees
over a 1.5m ring around the conduit.
r = Radius of opening = 1.152 m
= 1.152 + 1.500 = 2.652 m

^6
E = 2.100 x 10 t/m2

^-6
= 12 x 10 t/m2
Dt = 3 deg
sqt = 1.152 m
3𝑎−𝑐
= -2(2𝑎−𝑐)  E Dt

= ( 3 x 2.652 - 1.152 )
2.1x10^6 x 12x10^-6 x 3
2 x ( 2 x 2.652 - 1.152 )
2
= 61.944 t/m

sqt at r = 2.652 m
𝑎−𝑐
= -2(2𝑎−𝑐)  E Dt

= ( 2.652 - 1.152 )
2.1x10^6 x 12x10^-6 x 3
2 x ( 2 x 2.652 - 1.152 )

2
= 13.656 t/m

sqt at r = 2.304 m
𝑎−𝑐
= -2 2𝑎−𝑐 .𝑅2
 E Dt

= 13.656 / ( 2.304 / 2.652 )^2

2
= 18.093 t/m

Tension becomes zero at a distance x (Fig.15.12) given by

X 1.5 - X
=
61.944 13.656
75.6 X = 61.944 x 1.5
or X = 1.229 m

1.229 0.27 -0.348

 13.656 18.093

61.944

Total tension = 0.500 x 61.944 x 1.229 -

0.500 x 13.656 x 0.271 -
0.667 x (13.656+18.093)x -0.348
= 43.582 t

Total tension with temprature stress

a) When reservior is empty

Tension = 20.230 + 43.582

= 63.812 t

b) When reservior is full

Tension = 16.019 + 13.274 + 43.582
= 72.875 t

2
Allowing stress of 14000 t/m

As = 72.875 / 14000
2
= 0.005205 m

Taking the case when there is no tempreature stress

Total tension = 16.019 + 13.274

= 29.293 t

2
Allowing stress of 11250 t/m

As = 29.293 / 11250
2
= 0.002604 m

An area of 0.005205 m2 is assumed for detailed analysis

𝑎. 𝑐
a = (n = 15 )
𝑛. 𝐴𝑠
= 1.152 x 0.750
15 x 0.005205
= 11.066

B = 1−
2 6
 2a + 6
= 1 - 11.066
11.066 x2 + 6
= -0.358
1+a
C =
3+
= 1 + 11.066
3 + 11.066
= 0.858
1−a
D =
1+
= 1 - 11.066
1 + 11.066
= -0.834

Hence a= 11.066 B = -0.358 C = 0.858 D = -0.834

Substituting these values in above equations exact determination of tension has been made.

Stress due to dam loads and hydrostatic pressure

sq = 𝜎𝑛 𝐷 − 𝜎𝑛 6𝐵
1− 2 1 − 4 cos2θ
2 𝑅 2 𝑅
0.445 − 1.234
= sn 0.5 + 𝑅2
sn 0.5 + 𝑅4
cos2θ

For R = 1.00
sq = 0.917 sn - 1.574 sn Cos 2q

For R = 1.25
sq = 0.767 sn - 0.940 sn Cos 2q

For R = 1.5
sq = 0.685 sn - 0.712 sn Cos 2q

For R = 1.75
sq = 0.636 sn - 0.615 sn Cos 2q

For R = 2.00
sq = 0.604 sn - 0.567 sn Cos 2q
Table A- Stress due to dam loads and hydrostatic pressure

sq t/m2
R q = 0 q = 45
2 2 2 2
sn in t/m sn in t/m sn in t/m sn in t/m
1.00 72.31 1.00 72.31
1.00 -0.66 -47.51 0.92 66.31
1.25 -0.17 -12.51 0.77 55.45
1.50 -0.03 -1.94 0.69 49.56
1.75 0.02 1.57 0.64 46.00
2.00 0.04 2.68 0.60 43.69

Stress due to internal pressure

sqp = s
−
1 + 𝑅2
= -11.066 P
2
12.066 R

= -0.917 P
R2
Table B- Stress due to internal pressure

sqp t/m2
R P in t/m
2
P in t/m
2

1 23.046
1.00 -0.92 -21.14
1.25 -0.59 -13.53
1.50 -0.41 -9.39
1.75 -0.30 -6.90
2.00 -0.23 -5.28
Stress due to temprature

It been calculated above and is tabulated

sqt at r = 1.440 m (1.25R)

𝑎−𝑐
= -2 2𝑎−𝑐 .𝑅2
 E Dt

2
= 13.656 / ( 1.44 / 2.652 )^2 = 46.318 t/m

sqt at r = 1.728 m (1.5R)

𝑎−𝑐
= -  E Dt
2 2𝑎−𝑐 .𝑅2

2
= 13.656 / ( 1.728 / 2.652 )^2 = 32.165 t/m

sqt at r = 2.016 m (1.75R)

𝑎−𝑐
= -2 2𝑎−𝑐 .𝑅2
 E Dt

2
= 13.656 / ( 2.016 / 2.652 )^2 = 23.631 t/m

sqt at r = 2.304 m (2.0R)

𝑎−𝑐
= -  E Dt
2 2𝑎−𝑐 .𝑅2

2
= 13.656 / ( 2.304 / 18.093 )^2 = 18.093 t/m

Table C- Temprature Stresses

R sqr t/m2
1.00 -61.944
1.25 -46.318
1.50 -32.165
1.75 -23.631
2.00 -18.093
Table D- Summation of stresses in Table A, B and C

sq t/m2
R
q = 0 q = 45
1.00 -130.59 -16.77
1.25 -72.36 -4.39
1.50 -43.50 8.00
1.75 -28.97 15.47
2.00 -20.69 20.32

Case-1 Considering temprature stresses and allowing 14000 t/m2 stresses in steel

Total tension = 3.44/4 (19.5+66.3+11.8+1.5-0.3)

= 28.4544 t

Steel takes load = n As sqs 0.288

0.150
Assuming the steel to be provided 0.25 meter from boundary, then stress at that level.

= 72.36 + ( 0.288 - 0.15 ) x ( 130.59 - 72.36 )

0.288
2
= 100.26 t/m
(n = 15 )
n As sqs = 15 x 0.005205 x 100.26
= 7.83 t

Total tension = 100.26 + 7.83

= 108.09 say 109.00 t

Steel required = 109.00 / 14000

= 0.007786 m2
Case-II Considering stress only due to dam loads, hydrostatic pressure and internal pressure
the following normal stress in steel (11250 t/m2)

Table E Summation of stresses in Table A, B and C

sq t/m2
R
q = 0 q = 45
1.00 -68.64 45.17
1.25 -26.04 41.93
1.50 -11.33 40.16
1.75 -5.34 39.10
2.00 -2.60 38.41

Total tension = 1.152/4 (34.32+26.04+11.33+5.34+1.3)

= 112 t

Steel takes load = n As sqs 0.288

0.150
Assuming the steel to be provided 0.25 meter from boundary, then stress at that level.
we have at 0.25m from the boundary

= 26.04 + ( 0.288 - 0.15 ) x ( 68.64 - 26.04 )

0.288
= 46.45 t/m2
(n = 15 )
n As sqs = 15 x 0.005205 x 46.45
= 3.63 t

Total tension = 46.45 + 3.63 = 50.08 t

= 50.08 say 51.00 t `

Steel required = 51.00 / 11250

= 0.004533 m2

Hence bigger quantity of steel will be provided.

2
= 0.007786 m
2
= 77.86 Cm

Provide 16f @ 200c/c Main Reinforcement (105.94 Cm2)

12f @ 200c/c Dist Reinforcement
Design of Air Vent for Head Regulator (Irrigation Sluice)
Size of Air Vent

Reservoir standards:
1. T.B.L. = 129.800 m
2. M.W.L. = 126.000 m
3. F.R.L. = 126.000 m
4. M.D.D.L. = 95.100 m
5. Deepest foundation level = 84.487 m
6. Sill level of sluice = 93.000 m
7. Top level of sluice = 94.000 m
8. Number of sluices = 1
9. Size of sluice = 1 m x 1.5 m
10. Design Discharge = 5.000 Cumecs

Criteria: 1
Depth of at vena contracta, Y = Cd D
Where
Cd = 0.8 ( For 45o leaf gate bottom -
Applied Hydraulics by C.V.Davis: P22-76)
D = Height of Gate opening in meters
= 1.50 m
B Width = 1.00 m 0.15

1.50 m 1.20 m

\ Depth of at vena contracta, Y = 0.8 * 1.5

= 1.20 m
Spouting velocity, V = 2gh

Where, h = Difference in head from the reservoir surface to the top of the vena contracta
= 126 - 93.85
= 32.150 m

\ Spouting velocity, V = SQRT(2 * 9.81 * 32.15 )

= 25.12 m/sec
Froude numer at vena contracta, F1c = V/gY
= 25.12 / (SQRT(9.81 * 1.2 ))
= 7.32
Discharge, Qw = V * Y * W (W : Width of sluice)
= 25.12 * 1.2 * 1
= 30.138 Cumecs

For free flow

Air - Demand ratio, b = Vol. Flow rate of air / vol. Flow rate of water
Air - Demand ratio, b = 0.09 F ( F : Froude number at vena contracta)
= 0.09 * 7.32
= 0.659
Vol. Rate of air = b Q = 0.659 * 30.138
= 19.855 Cumecs

Maximum velocity of air in the vent = 50 m/sec as per cl.3.6 of IS:11485-1985

Area of vent = Volume / velocity
= 19.855 / 50
= 0.397 m2
(/4) ´ d2 = 0.397
Dia of Air vent = SQRT( 0.397 / (PI()/4))
= 0.71 m Say 75 cm
Criteria: 2
As per guide rule 1 ( Proceedings of IV th of congress on Large Dams - Vol - II , Danna)
area of Air vent may be taken as 10% of the control gate area.
Control Gate area = 1.5 * 1
= 1.5 m2
10% of Gate area = 10/100 * 1.5
= 0.15 m2
(/4) ´ d2 = 0.15
Dia of Air vent = SQRT( 0.15 / (PI()/4))
= 0.44 m Say 45 cm
Criteria: 3
As per guide rule 2 , capacity of Air vent may be taken as 25% of conduit
discharge ( USBR design data ).
Sluice discharge = 30.138 Cumecs
Capacity of Air vent = 25/100 * 30.138
= 7.535 Cumecs
Maximum velocity of air in the vent = 50 m/sec as per cl.3.6 of IS:11485-1985
Area of vent = Volume / velocity
= 7.535 / 50
= 0.151 m2
(/4) ´ d2 = 0.151
Dia of Air vent = SQRT( 0.151 / (PI()/4))
= 0.44 m
Say 45 cm
\ Diameter of Air vent = Maximum value of criteria: 1 , 2 &3
= 75 cm
Say 75 cm
Provide 75 cm dia Hume pipe air vent from sluice, 0.5m downstream of
service gate to supply air, to avoid or minimize cavitation damages.
The Air vent is kept straight up and then bent up suitabily to meet at D/S face above FRL.
 DESIGN OF WING & RETURN WALLS

+100.00 W1
0
Grade of concrete : M25 +100.00
Density of RCC : 2.500 t/m3
Density of Concrete : : 2.500 t/m3 W6
Density of Soil : 2.100 t/m3 W5 W3
Live load Surcharge : 0.000 m 13000
Ф : 30 W4 W2
Ka : 0.333
μ = tanФ : 0.577
500 8500 750 0 500
87.000 B A W7
1000
86.000
9250
10250

Seismic condition

Basic horizontal seismic coefficient for Zone III = 0.04

Impartance factor = 3
ah Horizontal seismic coefficient = 0.120

Load due to Self wt of Pier

at stem bottom 162.500 t
at abutment found. 188.125 t excluding Earth fill weight

V1 162.500 / 1.000 = 162.500 t/m

V2 188.13 / 1.000 = 188.125 t/m

H1 0.12 x 162.500 = 19.500 tm

H2 0.12 x 188.125 = 22.575 tm

M1 19.500 x ( 100.000 - 87.0)/2 = 126.750 tm at stem bottom

M2 22.575 x ( 100.000 - 86.0)/2 = 158.025 tm at abutment found.

STRESS ON CONCRETE: ( Taking moments about 'A' )

Load Description Load-t L.A -m Moment-tm
W1 0.750 x 0.000 x 2.500 0.000 8.875 0.000
W2 0.50 x 0.000 x 13.000 x 2.500 0.000 9.250 0.000
W3 0.750 x 13.000 x 2.500 24.375 8.875 216.328
W4 0.50 x 8.500 x 13.000 x 2.500 138.125 5.667 782.71
W5 0.50 x 8.500 x 13.000 x 2.100 116.025 2.833 328.74
Total Load 278.53
Pe 0.1666 x ( 13.000 ² - 0.000 ²)x 2.100 59.12 4.329 255.94
Sesmic force 126.75
Total Moment 1710.46
Leverarm = 1710.46 / 278.53 = 6.141 m
Eccentricity = 4.625 - 6.14 = 1.516 m
B/6 = 9.250 /6 = 1.542 m> 1.516 m Hence No Tension

28
 MAX. STRESS = 278.53 x {1 + 6 x 1.516 } = 59.72 t/m²
9.25 9.250 ( Compression )
MIN STRESS = 278.53 x {1 - 6 x 1.516 } = 0.50 t/m²
9.25 9.250 ( Compression )

STRESS ON SOIL: ( Taking moments about 'B' )

Load Description Load-t L.A -m Moment-tm
W1 0.750 x 0.000 x 2.500 0.000 9.375 0.00
W2 0.5 x 0.000 x 13.000 x 2.500 0.000 9.750 0.00
W3 0.750 x 13.000 x 2.500 24.375 9.375 228.52
W4 0.5 x 8.500 x 13.000 x 2.500 138.125 6.167 851.77
W5 0.5 x 8.500 x 13.000 x 2.100 116.025 3.333 386.75
W6 0.500 x 13.000 x 2.100 13.650 0.250 3.41
W7 10.250 x 1.000 x 2.500 25.625 5.125 131.33
Total Load 317.80
Pe 0.1666 x ( 14.000 ² - 0.000 ² ) x 2.100 68.57 4.662 319.66
Sesmic force 158.03
Total Moment 2079.46

Leverarm = 2079.46 / 317.80 = 6.543 m

Eccentricity = 5.125 - 6.54 = 1.418 m
B/6 = 10.250 /6 = 1.708 m > 1.418 m Hence No Tension

MAX. STRESS = 317.80 x {1 + 6 x 1.418 } = 56.75 t/m²

10.25 10.250 ( Compression )
MIN STRESS = 317.80 x {1 - 6 x 1.418 } = 5.26 t/m²
10.25 10.250 ( Compression )

FOS for Sliding = Σ MR/ Σ MO 1497.65 / 319.66 = 4.685 > 1.5 SAFE
FOS for Overturning = μ (Σ v/ Σ H ) 0.58 x 317.80 / 68.567 = 2.676 > 1.2 SAFE

29
 DESIGN OF TRAINING WALLS

+98.00 W1
0
Grade of concrete : M25 +98.00
Density of RCC : 2.500 t/m3
Density of Concrete : : 2.500 t/m3 W6
Density of Soil : 2.100 t/m3 W5 W3
Live load Surcharge : 0.000 m 11383
Ф : 30 W4 W2
Ka : 0.333
μ = tanФ : 0.577
500 6500 1500 0 500
86.617 B A W7
1000
85.617
8000
9000

Seismic condition

Basic horizontal seismic coefficient for Zone III = 0.04

Impartance factor = 3
ah Horizontal seismic coefficient = 0.120

Load due to Self wt of Pier

at stem bottom 135.173 t
at abutment found. 157.673 t excluding Earth fill weight

V1 135.173 / 1.000 = 135.173 t/m

V2 157.67 / 1.000 = 157.673 t/m

H1 0.12 x 135.173 = 16.221 tm

H2 0.12 x 157.673 = 18.921 tm

M1 16.221 x ( 98.000 - 86.6)/2 = 92.321 tm at stem bottom

M2 18.921 x ( 98.000 - 85.6)/2 = 117.148 tm at abutment found.

STRESS ON CONCRETE: ( Taking moments about 'A' )

Load Description Load-t L.A -m Moment-tm
W1 1.500 x 0.000 x 2.500 0.000 7.250 0.000
W2 0.50 x 0.000 x 11.383 x 2.500 0.000 8.000 0.000
W3 1.500 x 11.383 x 2.500 42.686 7.250 309.475
W4 0.50 x 6.500 x 11.383 x 2.500 92.487 4.333 400.78
W5 0.50 x 6.500 x 11.383 x 2.100 77.689 2.167 168.33
Total Load 212.86
Pe 0.1666 x ( 11.383 ² - 0.000 ²)x 2.100 45.33 3.791 171.82
Sesmic force 92.32
Total Moment 1142.72
Leverarm = 1142.72 / 212.86 = 5.368 m
Eccentricity = 4.000 - 5.37 = 1.368 m
B/6 = 8.000 /6 = 1.333 m< 1.368 m Tension

28
 MAX. STRESS = 212.86 x {1 + 6 x 1.368 } = 53.91 t/m²
8.00 8.000 ( Compression )
MIN STRESS = 212.86 x {1 - 6 x 1.368 } = -0.70 t/m²
8.00 8.000 ( Tension )

STRESS ON SOIL: ( Taking moments about 'B' )

Load Description Load-t L.A -m Moment-tm
W1 1.500 x 0.000 x 2.500 0.000 7.750 0.00
W2 0.5 x 0.000 x 11.383 x 2.500 0.000 8.500 0.00
W3 1.500 x 11.383 x 2.500 42.686 7.750 330.82
W4 0.5 x 6.500 x 11.383 x 2.500 92.487 4.833 447.02
W5 0.5 x 6.500 x 11.383 x 2.100 77.689 2.667 207.17
W6 0.500 x 11.383 x 2.100 11.952 0.250 2.99
W7 9.000 x 1.000 x 2.500 22.500 4.500 101.25
Total Load 247.31
Pe 0.1666 x ( 12.383 ² - 0.000 ² ) x 2.100 53.64 4.124 221.20
Sesmic force 117.15
Total Moment 1427.59

Leverarm = 1427.59 / 247.31 = 5.772 m

Eccentricity = 4.500 - 5.77 = 1.272 m
B/6 = 9.000 /6 = 1.500 m > 1.272 m Hence No Tension

MAX. STRESS = 247.31 x {1 + 6 x 1.272 } = 50.79 t/m²

9.00 9.000 ( Compression )
MIN STRESS = 247.31 x {1 - 6 x 1.272 } = 4.17 t/m²
9.00 9.000 ( Compression )

FOS for Sliding = Σ MR/ Σ MO 1019.43 / 221.20 = 4.609 > 1.5 SAFE
FOS for Overturning = μ (Σ v/ Σ H ) 0.58 x 247.31 / 53.642 = 2.662 > 1.2 SAFE

29
S.No Components Concrete Grade MSA
1 Apron M15 40
2 Wearing Coat M20 20
3 Cut off M25 20
4 Pier M25 40
5 Abutment M25 40
6 Wings M25 40
7 Divide walls M25 40
8 Hoist Columns M25 20
9 Bridge Bedblocks M30 20
10 Bridge Beams M30 20
11 Bridge Slab M30 20
12 Bridge WC M35 20