Sample Chapter Three
Sample Chapter Three
3.1.Introduction
This chapter highlights the research design, study location, study variables, target population,
sampling techniques and sample size, study instruments, pilot study, validity and reliability of
3.2.Research Design
This study adopted a case study design mainly using qualitative approach. Qualitative approach
aims at exploring the social reality of individuals, groups and cultures (Creswell, 2003 & Creswell,
2012). The approach adopted the use of semi-structured interview guide, questionnaire schedule
and non-participant observation checklist for collecting data (Denzin & Linoln, 1994). Case study
3.3.Study Variables
The study variables included independent, dependent and intervening variables. Independent
variables included;
by the teachers’ ability to execute interventional teaching dispensations on the basis of their
knowledge about signs of SLD and competence to innovate and use classroom instructional
strategies.
Intervening variables included child’s medical health and family background. These are factors
which are known to significantly affect the functions of both independent and dependent variables
The study was conducted in Joy town special primary school for physically challenged children in
Thika, Kiambu county. About two thirds of these learners have cerebral palsy which is one of the
major causes of speech difficulties. Being the largest special primary school in the country Joy
town has the highest number of teachers who have long experience in working with children with
This study targeted only 31 teachers working in Joy town special primary school regardless of
their age and gender. This number was inclusive of the head teacher.
The school was purposively selected. The school has a national outlook drawing children from all
over Kenya with different social-linguistic backgrounds and the majority of them have SLD. All
teachers working in the school were used because they were not many and since they directly
interacted with children with SLD, they constituted the most suitable target population which
Out of the 31 targeted teachers, 2 were used during pilot-test. Therefore, the study sample size was
29 teachers who participated in the actual study. This number included the head teacher.
A semi-structured interview guide(see Appendix II) was prepared for the head teacher to obtain
the required information. The interview guide was used in order to obtain in-depth information
through probing the head teacher. Kothari (2009) asserts that this strategy allows flexibility in
Questionnaires (see Appendix III) were prepared for the teachers because they can individually
record and interpret them well. The questionnaire constituted 3 sections covering specific items of
the objectives. The questionnaire procedure was useful in this study because it was time saving
and the researcher was not needed to be present during the filling of the questionnaires.
3.7.3. Observation Checklist
The study used non-participant observation method (see Appendix IV) where the researcher was
merely taking notes of what she observed. Observation schedule was used to observe teachers in
3.8. Pilot-test
A pilot-test was conducted with two teachers in the school under the study to ascertain the validity
and reliability of data collection instruments and appropriateness of the anticipated analytical
techniques. This is why the study sample size was 29 instead of 31 since 2 of them participated in
the pilot-test. The reason was that all teachers in the school directly interacted with learners with
SLD and faced similar experiences. The two teachers filled the questionnaires. Teacher
observation during pilot-testing was done on the same teachers by the researcher in classroom
teaching. The head teacher was not used in the pilot-test. The teachers used for the pilot-test did
not participate in the actual research. The procedure used in pre-testing was the same as the one
3.8.1. Validity
An instrument is valid if it measures what it is intended to measure and accurately achieves the
purpose for what it was designed. Research instruments were validated through application of
content validity determined by expert judgment and inclusion of supervisors ‘suggestions. Further,
This means the degree of consistency demonstrated in a study (Welman & Kruger, 2001).
Reliability was determined by pilot-testing the questionnaires on the purposively selected teachers.
The study used Cronbach Coefficient Alpha test for internal consistency to obtain the average
score of the split half estimates. The study coefficient alpha was 0.913. It is important to note that
However, below 0.70, the internal consistency becomes questionable but above 0.70 to 0.10
correlation coefficient is perfectly high. In this case, the study items had a relatively high
reliability.
The researcher requested for permission from the Ministry of Education through the Dean of
Graduate School to conduct the research. The researcher further sought permission from the
Education County Director, Thika West. The primary data was collected using questionnaires,
observation schedule and interview guide. Following a successful application requesting for pilot-
testing and data collection, the researcher explained the nature and purpose of the study to establish
rapport with the teachers who were used for the pilot-test. Then, during the actual data collection
on a separate day the researcher held interview with the head teacher early in the morning before
distributing questionnaires to teachers in the staffroom during tea break. Once again, the researcher
explained the study purpose to teachers who were not used in the piloting exercise and personally
distributed questionnaires to them. The researcher was present to clarify any possible ambiguities
during the filling of the questionnaires. Teachers’ classroom observation was done on the same
day. At first, the researcher requested the particular teachers for permission to use their lessons
during the observation. In the classrooms, the researcher was introduced by teachers to the learners
before sitting at the back of the class to take notes using the observation checklist until the end of
the lesson. The collection of questionnaires was done on the following day since it was not possible
to have them completed on the first day. Out of 29 questionnaires, only 24 (82.8%) were returned.
The researcher edited the data collected from the field to ensure they were error-free. In the case
of quantitative data the researcher numbered the questionnaires appropriately. This was followed
by the coding process to mark and categorize information such as gender, age and level of
education. Then, data was entered into the computer program known as Statistics Package for
Social Sciences (SPSS)to aid in data analysis. The quantitative data was analyzed using simple
descriptive statistics such as graphs, percentages, charts, tables and frequencies. Qualitative data
was analyzed thematically and sorted according to the emerging themes (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
Inasmuch as the researcher promised voluntary participation, she informed the respondents of the
importance and justification of the study since their participation was extremely pertinent for the
purpose of data collection. The researcher also assured the respondents that their identity would
fully be protected by a careful exercise of anonymity and confidentiality. Finally, the researcher
disseminated the findings of the study with accuracy, honesty and responsibility to the professional
fraternity in the educational community through publication in the International Journal of Social