Critical Appreciation of The Wasteland
Critical Appreciation of The Wasteland
T. S. Eliot’s The Waste Land (1922) is the most discussed poem of the 20th century. It was written post World
War I as an indictment of the spiritual and sexual sterility Western culture was experiencing. Images of
dryness and dessication run throughout, as does Eliot’s sense that Western paths to spirituality and love had lost
vitality and meaning.
Theme:
According to Day, "The Waste Land is a condemnation of the sterile futility of modern life." Its pattern is that
of death and resurrection, but it asserts that the modern period is more willing to settle for death than to seek
renewed vitality.
Underlying myth: Eliot took his central myth as well as the title of the poem from Jessie L. Weston’s From
Ritual to Romance (1920) and from Sir James Frazer’s The Golden Bough. Weston sees the legend of the Holy
Grail as resting on ancient myths of the vegetation and fertility cycle. The fundamental story, as presented in
such myths as that of the Grail Knight Percival (Parsifal), concerns a Fisher King who through illness or wound
is rendered sexually impotent. The land, therefore, is blighted, an arid land sorely in need of water. The curse
may be removed, and both the king and the land restored to fertility, by a quester who endures hardships to seek
and bring back a cup and spear (or sword).
Technique: Day calls the poem a "ritual drama," employing a montage succession of images ranging through
Western art, literature, and life to illuminate the theme. This sequencing is "more effective than a logical
transition from one example of the theme to another."
Who is the protagonist?:
With fragmentary passages, literary quotations and allusions, there is an apparent lack of logical relationship
along them. The reason is that the whole poem is a stream of consciousness in verse of one personage, Tiresias.
He is the protagonist. Almost immortal, blind, bisexual he is the hidden poet, the very learned. Through
memories, meditations, literary quotations, allusions and implicit contrasts his is the view of materialistic world.
Structure of the poem: The Five sections
Part I. The Burial of the Dead: In April the vegetation God of Christianity, Jesus the Christ, is crucified, and
the postwar cafes of central Europe murmur with hopelessness, preferring the hibernation of winter to a
renewed life in the spring. Angry denunciations of the prophet are followed by taunting pictures of modern
sterility and of the oracle debased into a fortune-teller. A pedestrian on the London street is accosted with a
question about whether the buried corpse of the Vegetation God in his back yard will arise to renew the land
and the spirit.
Part II. A Game of Chess: The futility of upper class life is demonstrated by a frustrated lady, a spiritual desert
in the midst of sumptuous magnificence. The ancient and Renaissance past have become devalued and
vulgarized. Futility in the lower classes is represented by a cockney girl who sits in a London pub near closing
time, relating a sordid tale of sexual desire, abortion, and life denial. The title of this section comes from
Women Beware Women by Thomas Middleton, where a game of chess is a cover for a seduction.
Part III. The Fire Sermon: Futility in the middle classes is represented by a series of fornications and perverse
materialisms. From this inferno of unholy love come warnings from St. Augustine, Zechariah, and Buddha
(whose Fire Sermon gives the section its title), calling for transcendence of the spirit over the flesh, and
heavenly love instead of carnal lust.
Part IV. Death by Water: Throughout the poem, water is a symbol of life and regeneration, but to many
modern people, the womb of life has proved a tomb.
Part V. What the Thunder Said: The betrayal and crucifixion of Jesus are the keynote for the depths of
despondency and hallucination in the parched land. The quester, his mind almost broken from pain, comes to
the Chapel Perilous, and the rains finally begin. From out of the thunder, God announces three disciplines: Datta
(give), Dayadhvam (sympathize), Damyata (control). Although the path to a new life is offered, the closing
lines recognize that the modern world is still in the waste land.