Dev. Admin - Complete
Dev. Admin - Complete
Structure
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Meaning of Development and Development Administration
1.2.1 Concept of Development
1.2.2 Development Administration: Meaning and Definition
1.3 Scope of Development Administration
1.4 Objectives of Development Administration
1.5 Features of Development Administration
1.6 Difference between Traditional Administration and Development Administration
1.7 Conclusion
1.8 References
________________________________________________________________________
1.0 OBJECTIVES
________________________________________________________________________
1.1 INTRODUCTION
________________________________________________________________________
Development Administration is evolved as a branch of public administration and
primarily concerned with government and administration of developing countries of Asia,
Africa and Latin America which emerged after Second World War. It focuses to develop
the activity of government to bring a change, especially in achieving the progressive
_____________________________________________________________________
1
objectives in the social, economic and political fields. Development administration put
forward any social or political system and structure on the path of development. It is also
concerned with well-organised, integrated and directed efforts of national government to
bring about socio-economic progress, welfare and well-being of people at large.
________________________________________________________________________
1.2 MEANING OF DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATION
______________________________________________________________________
2
and usefulness, has not brought its ‘trickle down’ effect. So, in late 1960s and early 1970s
emphasis, is laid to cover the context of Human Development Index in a United Nations
framework and, is changed to ‘growth with redistribution’ which covers the essential
needs of self-reliance, empowerment, security, more equality of opportunity, promotion
of employment, greater individual freedom, improvement in the carrying capacity,
including health and nutrition, sanitation and shelter, education and water supply etc.
Accordingly, development is an agent of socio-economic progress (transformation) and
nation-building.
With diverse meaning of the term development, it is a very complex task to define it. It is
adynamic and changing concept and it has its origin in human civilisation and culture. It
is a kind of liquid material that takes the shape of the utensils in which they are placed. It
is now better to refer to various definitions given by different scholars. “Development
never will be, and never can be, defined to universal satisfaction”, states the Brandt
Commission Report (1980). Many economists defined ‘development’ in terms of
economic productivity; Sociologists use this term in the context of social transformation;
some political thinkers include democratisation, political capacity, expanding and
increasing the capacity of the government and political system in it and still others like
administrators think of it in terms of developing administrative capacity and skills. Thus,
development comprises of various dimensions of economic, political, administrative and
social. Moving further, it is now necessary to understand development in a holistic
framework.
3
Fred W Riggs (1970) defines development as “rising level of autonomy or discretion, in
the sense of ability to choose among alternatives, not, of course, in sense of caution or
moderation”. He introduces the concept of development as “an increase in level of
discretion of social system”. According to Dudley Seers (1969), development is “the
realisation of the potential of human personality” and he further argued and suggested
that this was best achieved through the “reduction of poverty, unemployment and
inequality” and later realised necessity to include self-reliance and increased cultural
independence. Further, Michael Todaro (1977) described development as a “multi-
dimensional process involving changes in structures, attitudes, and institutions as well as
the acceleration of economic growth, reduction of inequality, and eradication of absolute
poverty”.
4
forward any social or political system and structure on the path of development. It is also
concerned with organised and managed efforts of national government to bring welfare
and well-being of people. Many scholars have defined development administration in
their own way:-
On the other hand, Fred W Riggs (1970), has defined Development Administration as
“organised efforts to carry out programmes or projects thought by those involved to serve
developmental objectives”. According to George F Gant (1979), Development
administration denotes a “complex of agencies, management systems and the processes
that a government establishes to achieve its developmental goals. Development
administration has an innovative dimension, as it is flexible enough to design new
methods, procedures, policies, which could save time, increase effectiveness and
quality”. Further George Gant put forward characteristics of Development Administration
by its purposes, its loyalties and its attitudes. The purpose of Development
Administration is to stimulate and facilitate definite and defined programme to bring in
socio-economic progress. The loyalty of development administration has to be
accountable to the people at large and attitudes of Development Administration should be
positive, persuasive and innovative.
5
based on and by following all processes, plans, policies, programmes and projects to
achieve socio-economic progress and national goals. It is concerned with modernisation,
institution-building, democratisation and establishment of just and equal social and
political order so that benefits can show a trickledown effect. It is planned change to
strengthen administrative capacity and to Administration of Development plans, policies,
programmes and projects including improving/removing environmental, traditional and
parochial cultural constraints. Accordingly, development administration is concerned
with three major components namely: (a) prevalent enthusiasm, zeal and willingness to
undertake development projects, (b) employing new forward moving techniques, and (c)
suitable skill and capacity building to achieve various aims and objectives of
development.
________________________________________________________________________
1.3 SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION
_______________________________________________________________________
Scholars with different views, like Lucien Pye, F. W. Riggs and Edward Weidner have,
pointed towards the wide areas of Developmental Administration. They have stated that
6
the administrative process of fulfilling the political, economic and social objectives set by
an appropriate officer or government is called Development Administration. According
to them, scope of development administration is not limited only to economic
development but social and political development are also included in its subject matter.
Development Administration is related to all those programmes, schemes, purposes and
organisation that work for the overall development and nation-building of the country. It
is such a developmental and progressive process that fulfils the developmental goals of
administration by using the new, modern, and up-to-date means, tools and abilities.
Accordingly, with the analysis of thinkers of both slides of the spectrum, we find that the
area is determined by both in their own way. But it is so certain that both are unanimous
in area, scope and subject matter of Development Administration and relate it with
nation-building. Under the area of Development Administration, forms of work and
efforts made for nation-building are implemented by public organisations and
government administration. According to J N Khosla, Development Administration is a
difficult administrative structure in which economic, social, political, and administrative
means and powers are mixed for the fulfillment of objectives and goal.
7
administration to solve these problems for the smooth operation of the economy.
Satisfaction of human needs is the basic objective of economic life in the context
of limited resources. Economic resources are limited due to demand and
alternative experiments, and on the other hand, there are different types of
demands in society. George F. Gant, while defining Development Administration
includes poverty alleviation as an important goal. Amartya Sen (1999), on the
other hand in his book ‘Development as a Freedom’ while highlighting aspects of
capability approach also relates economic poverty and substantive freedom from
capability perspective, as opposed to measuring it in terms of per capita income.
He stressed on intrinsically important deprivations, which causes capability
deprivation, that is, on real poverty, and on relations between low income and low
capability. Therefore, an important concern of Development Administration is to
use the limited resources according to human needs and social satisfaction, which
can lead to smooth operation of economic system.
9
is important to give prominence to proper assessment and utilisation of resources,
firmness of plan precedence, appropriate formulation, fair implementation,
suitable monitoring and reasonable evaluation of plans and project with
efficiency, economy and effectiveness. Accordingly, various components of
institutional framework need to be well-coordinated for effective development
administration, with an aim to achieve maximum results with minimum costs and
time.
It is obvious from the above discussion that the area, scope and subject matter of the
development administration is very wide and it includes all the schemes related to
national development programmes, through which economic, social, political and
administrative development of the country can take place. Not only this, the solution of
10
problems of production, consumption, exchange, distribution and revenue also comes
under the area of development administration.
______________________________________________________________________
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION
______________________________________________________________________
After having analysed the area, scope and subject matter of the Development
Administration, we will now describe the objectives of Development Administration. Its
basic objective is to understand the administrative problem related to development,
which in turn creates various impediments in the way of development. These
impediments include poverty, illiteracy, population increase, resource crunch,
environmental deterioration, fall in food production, energy crisis, low living standards of
middle class, absence of national unity, decrease in per capita income etc. These and
many more impediments, when accumulated put pressure and impact on the capacity and
skill of administration and by which they become less effective. That is why development
administration has become important for the, social, economic and political development
of nation as such. Despite various impediments, it is important to give emphasis and
create such environmental situation for administrative institutions by implementing
developmental programmes, which can bring fruitful and satisfactory results. The
usefulness and success of Development Administration depends on the following
objectives in mind:
11
• strengthening and increasing the administrative capacity for development.
• administration of development plans, policies, programmes and projects including
improving/removing environmental constraints.
• mobilising resources and their allocation for various development activities at a
large-scale.
• increasing responsibility to carry out intended change in the direction of social,
political and economic arenas.
• developing coordination among various functional units of developmental
projects for proper and timely implementation.
• understanding the actual local problems by administrative officials so that they
can formulate developmental policies and programmes according to needs and
aspiration of local people.
• Facilitating dedicated administrative leadership to generate awareness,
commitment, discipline and feeling of unity for success of economic planning and
community development plan.
• Encouraging active and voluntary participation of people at large is for making
developmental programmes functional.
• Bringing efficient, skilled, competent, trained bureaucracy to bring suitable new
changes and transformation in society; and
• developing proper and amicable relationship between permanent executive and
political executive for public policy formulation and implementation.
________________________________________________________________________
1.5 FEATURES OF DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION
12
________________________________________________________________________
To my mind, result orientedness is the first and more important features of Development
Administration. People of any nation want immediate and rapid results. Development
Administration at the same time wants to solve problems in a definite time-frame and for
that it employs various welfare-oriented productive facilities related to increase in per
capita income, education, health etc.
The purpose of administration is basically to serve the people at large and for this it is an
utmost responsibility of administration to always do welfare-oriented work for them.
People also monitor their various works. In this context, Development Administration’s
central concern is towards satisfying the basic needs of its client (people) and work
13
positively for the upliftment of poor and weaker sections of society. It is needed to be
flexible and action-oriented in its approach for delivery and administration of community
development programmes. For this purpose, development administration requires
requisite capacity to mediate and respond to the substantive demands of the people and
environmental challenges. Therefore, these clients are not the only functional
responsibility of Development Administration, but due to the benefits that they derive,
they actively participate in the public welfare programmes.
14
Development Administration is concerned with organised and coordinated efforts to carry
out various developmental activities. These activities are channelised for building of
human and material resources for development. Coordination is important to bring
organised efforts, discipline among various administrative units and for proper
monitoring and investigation. Accordingly, development administration decides,
prioritises, and applies suitable and appropriate methods of control and coordination at
different functional level. It is then we can expect proper implementation of various
policies and programmes.
On the other hand, for the development of any society or nation, active and greater
participation of people is very important to achieve development goals. Without their
meaningful participation in the developmental process, it would be impossible to realise
desired socio-economic progress. Proper participation of people can create an atmosphere
for mutual cooperation, sacrifice, surrender, mercy, love and tolerance which are
necessary conditions for development. Particularly for development administration it is
important that people give effective cooperation in the implementation of government’s
developmental programmes. For this, administrative needs to create and promote
conditions to facilitate greater and effective participation of people in the process of
change and delivery of public goods and services. Their participation in public policy
making, implementation, evaluation and monitoring with the purpose of benefitting them.
15
development administration into developed form and expand ways for all-round
development.
________________________________________________________________________
1.6 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TRADITIONAL ADMINISTRATION
AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION
_____________________________________________________________
Many scholars like George Gant, Ferrel Heady and others have sought to conceptualise
development administration as different from traditional administration. They explain
that these two types of administration differ from each other in terms of purpose,
structure and organisation, attitudes and behaviour, capabilities, techniques and methods.
This is the implicit meaning of the observation of John Gunnel who says, "The increasing
shift of development scenario requires increased diversification and specialisation of
knowledge and skills and high level of managerial ability for integrative co-ordination.
For quickening the pace of development, there is an additional need for a new breed of
administrators of superior calibre and vision, with a passion for achieving results and of
those who can take risks and introduce innovations. There is an increasing need to have
17
heightened sensitivity to the welfare of the poor sections and greater responsiveness to
the political process." It follows that development administration has to have different
features and should be based on different requisites than the traditional or law and order
or general administration. The distinction between the traditional and Development
Administration has been presented by S.P. Verma and S.K. Sharma as follows:
18
Traditional administration has been visualised as the one concerned with fulfilling all the
legal requirements of governmental operations and maintenance of social stability. In the
main, this type of administration confines itself to the maintenance of law and order,
collection of revenues and regulation of national life in accordance with the statutory
requirements. The assumption behind the differentiation between development
administration and traditional administration is that administration in newly emergent
nations must switch completely from law and order values to developmental values.
Thus, the qualitative goals of Development Administration i.e., planning for the people,
with people's support and co-operation distinguishes it from the quantitative goals of
Public Administration i.e. implementing rules (Adapted from BDP, EPA-03 on
Development Administration).
________________________________________________________________________
1.7 CHALLENGES OF DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION
________________________________________________________________________
19
• administrative and procedural delay,
• lack of enthusiasm, zeal and commitment in planning and implementation
• lack of sufficient discipline,
• lack of proper coordination and objective relationship between specialists and
generalists,
• highly centralised public policy making,
• poor direction, training and guidance,
• adopting poor methods and forward moving vision in public policy making,
• mismanaged and poor organisation of public enterprises, government
departments, boards and regulatory organisation and financial institutions,
• poor response of the people,
• existence of traditional attitudes, old customs, inappropriate languages and
religious beliefs,
• lack of political support to development programmes; and
• dearth of finances and material resources etc.
Activities
1. Visit your nearby hospital and make a list of the development activities taking
place there.
2. With the help of newsclips and write-ups, distinguish between traditional and
development administration.
_______________________________________________________________________
1.8 CONCLUSION
______________________________________________________________________
20
pushes it backward. If we actually want to move forward then we have to remove our old
customs and traditions as, there is a need to bring suitable changes in the contemporary
context. It is also important to understand the need to improve and strengthen the
capabilities of administrators. Further, at the same time, we have to control unorganised
society, turbulent environment, establish coordination and reconcile conflict of interest in
human beings also. We also need to remove chaos, confusion and disorder in society by
carrying out policies and programmes related to developmental goals of nation-building
and socio-economic progress. Otherwise, development administration would remain in
jeopardy.
1.7 REFERENCES
Hann- Been Lee, ‘Role of the Higher Civil Service under Rapid Social and Political
Change,’ in Weidner (ed), Development Administration in Asia, Duke University Press,
Durham, 1970.
21
Michael P. Todaro, “Economics for a Developing World”, Longman Group Ltd.,
London, 1977.
Riggs, Fred, W., “The Context of Development Administration”, In, Edward Weidner
(ed)., Development Administration in Asia, Duke University Press, Durham, 1970.
Riggs, Fred, W., The Ecology of Administration, Indiana University, Bloomington, 1964.
22
BLOCK 2 TRENDS IN DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATION
23