Does Introducing Parents To Learning To Learn Techniques CFL
Does Introducing Parents To Learning To Learn Techniques CFL
PROJECT AIMS
__________________________________________________________________
We aimed to discover whether involving parents and introducing them to various Learning to Learn
(L2L) approaches will develop their children’s self esteem and resilience as learners and so raise
standards.
RESEARCH FOCUS
___________________________________________ Focus in the 5Rs for
We are looking at the role of family learning in supporting Lifelong Learning:
Learning to Learn by arranging a series of evenings to introduce
parents to the major Learning to Learn approaches. We will Resilience
monitor the impact that the parent’s involvement has on the
Remembering
confidence and capability of their children.
Resourcefulness x
DIMENSIONS OF THIS CASE STUDY
___________________________________________ Reflectiveness
We are a nursery and infant school with a total of 155 full time
pupils plus 38 part-time in the nursery. The invitation to the Readiness
parents’ sessions went to all parents and between 30 and 40
parents attended each of the 12 sessions representing 50
children.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
__________________________________________________________________
• Sharing Learning to Learn approaches with parents raises their own self esteem and confidence
as learners.
• Involving parents in Learning to Learn enables them to feel more able to teach and help their
own children at home.
• The confidence of the parents communicates itself to the children.
• Even after only a few months improvements have been noticed in some of the children’s
performance.
1
YEAR ONE PROJECT 2003/2004
2
YEAR ONE PROJECT 2003/2004
whose children are now at the junior children. We have arranged for the best
school. The research will track how these speakers we could get in various L2L areas
children perform against their peers. The such as Mind Mapping, NLP etc to talk to
youngest pupil is three and the oldest the parents for approximately an hour a
eight. fortnight.
By turning parents into lifelong learners we An invitation was sent out to all parents of
are hoping to do the same for their children in our school and to the parents of
3
YEAR ONE PROJECT 2003/2004
last year’s Year 2 who are now in our sister • three main ways to learn, Visual,
junior school. These children had Auditory and Kinaesthetic (VAK) and
previously been introduced to a few L2L Brain Gym®;
ideas. We wanted the sessions to be • overcoming barriers to learning by
available to as many parents as possible. raising self esteem;
• memory skills and techniques to aid
An initial invitation was sent out which memory;
included a paragraph about our • visual learning including Mind Maps®;
involvement in the Learning to Learn • the different ways of being intelligent, a
Phase 3 Evaluation. We made it clear that brief overview of all of the intelligences;
although it was not necessary to attend all • thinking skills, various ways of
sessions we would be keeping a register of promoting thinking e.g. by Odd One
parents so that we could see whether Out puzzles, Mysteries, Fortune Lines;
regular attendance had more effect that • the importance of talk in particular
just coming to one or two talks. using a Philosophy For Children
approach; and
We were very encouraged by the very
• formative assessment and reflecting on
positive response we got and many
your own learning.
parents asked if we could perhaps do the
sessions again as they were unable to
At the end of each session parents were
make that particular evening.
encouraged to note down anything that
they felt they had learnt from that particular
We set out to be as welcoming and friendly
session or general comments about how
as possible as many parents still have a
they thought it had gone.
hesitant or even negative attitude towards
school and teachers. We also aimed to
Although we originally planned to have 9
keep each session light hearted and fun,
sessions parents requested more,
as well as imparting knowledge. At each
especially in the area of NLP. The teachers
session we offered tea, coffee and biscuits
involved were very enthusiastic about all of
and there was time for a chat before we
the approaches talked about and as the
started. The sessions lasted for an hour
sessions progressed became increasingly
although sometimes overran.
aware of a sense of belonging amongst the
parents who attended regularly. Both
The first session was led by the school’s
parents and teachers looked forward to the
Teaching and Learning Coordinator and
sessions for the camaraderie as well as the
provided an overview of L2L. The school
learning opportunities. Everyone came
purchased a CHAMPS® CD and this was away feeling that they had learnt
used on an interactive whiteboard to something worthwhile.
introduce the ideas of brain based learning.
Evidence Collected
For subsequent sessions we enlisted the The older children of parents who attended
help of LEA advisors, advanced skills these sessions have completed the project
teachers and independent consultants all questionnaire i.e. those children in Years 1
of whom were known to be experts in their and 2. The children from the Foundation
field and were good speakers. Stage were considered too young to be
able to complete this questionnaire. We
The topics covered were: did try modifying it for the younger children
• seeing yourself as a learner, which but found the exercise too time consuming.
included self talk and Neuro Linguistic
Programming (NLP);
4
YEAR ONE PROJECT 2003/2004
5
YEAR ONE PROJECT 2003/2004
We have collected data from these parents he can do it right. I feel I am building
via a questionnaire and feedback session. up his self esteem.
We received 23 completed questionnaires.
Where both parents attended only one
questionnaire was completed. We were particularly pleased to note this
lady’s comment about the child being able
One of our research aims was to discover to ‘do it’ even if at the present he is finding
whether involving parents in L2L it hard as this is fostering the child’s
approaches would develop their children’s resilience, which was one of our initial
self esteem and resilience as learners. It is aims.
easier for parents to do this if they
themselves have good self esteem. 65% It is obviously outside the capability of this
of parents questioned rated their own research to determine whether children of
ability as average before starting the parents attending this course will gain long
course but all said that their confidence in lasting learning resilience but given that
their own ability had increased after most educators agree that parental
attending the sessions. For example, attitudes and input have the most effect on
a child then it is fair to assume that
introducing L2L techniques to parents of
I have more confidence in my children who are just starting out in their
learning ability and therefore I feel school career will have a beneficial effect
this can only help my child’s learning on their self belief and performance as
ability. learners.
6
YEAR ONE PROJECT 2003/2004
My son is eager to learn and has What is striking about our school’s
learnt his spellings in half the time. performance over the last two years is the
correlation between the introduction of L2L
approaches in Year 2 and also to parents
and the rise in our PANDA grades. Last
year was the first year we really
We have already used Mind
concentrated on the Learning to Learn
Mapping® to learn left from right.
approaches of building resilient,
Also we have taught our child (three)
independent and confident learners and
many letters of the alphabet. All the
our average grades rose from E to A in
techniques we’ve used have been
both reading and writing and from D to A*
learnt on this course.
in maths. This year we have also
introduced parents to these ideas and
although the PANDA report hasn’t been
completed yet and results still have to be
We have learnt how to improve our finalised it is clear that we have maintained
capabilities – using both sides of the the higher standards achieved last year.
brain, Mind Mapping®, building
confidence etc.
7
YEAR ONE PROJECT 2003/2004
8
YEAR ONE PROJECT 2003/2004
9
YEAR ONE PROJECT 2003/2004
10