0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3K views22 pages

CH08 Wooldridge 7e PPT 2pp

This chapter discusses heteroskedasticity and its consequences for ordinary least squares regression. Heteroskedasticity invalidates the standard errors of the OLS estimators but OLS remains unbiased. Robust standard errors can be used to perform valid hypothesis tests. Several tests for detecting heteroskedasticity are presented, including the Breusch-Pagan and White tests. Weighted least squares can produce more efficient estimates when the form of heteroskedasticity is known.

Uploaded by

abendina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3K views22 pages

CH08 Wooldridge 7e PPT 2pp

This chapter discusses heteroskedasticity and its consequences for ordinary least squares regression. Heteroskedasticity invalidates the standard errors of the OLS estimators but OLS remains unbiased. Robust standard errors can be used to perform valid hypothesis tests. Several tests for detecting heteroskedasticity are presented, including the Breusch-Pagan and White tests. Weighted least squares can produce more efficient estimates when the form of heteroskedasticity is known.

Uploaded by

abendina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Chapter 8
Heteroskedasticity

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 1
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (1 of 18)
• Consequences of heteroskedasticity for OLS
• OLS still unbiased and consistent under heteroskedastictiy!
• Also, interpretation of R-squared is not changed

• Heteroskedasticity invalidates variance formulas for OLS estimators


• The usual F tests and t tests are not valid under heteroskedasticity
• Under heteroskedasticity, OLS is no longer the best linear unbiased estimator
(BLUE); there may be more efficient linear estimators

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 2
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (2 of 18)
• Heteroskedasticity-robust inference after OLS estimation
• Formulas for OLS standard errors and related statistics have been developed
that are robust to heteroskedasticity of unknown form.
• All formulas are only valid in large samples.
• Formula for heteroskedasticity-robust OLS standard error.

• Using these formulas, the usual t test is valid asymptotically.


• The usual F statistic does not work under heteroskedasticity, but
heteroskedasticity robust versions are available in most software.

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 3
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (3 of 18)
• Example: Hourly wage equation

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 4
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (4 of 18)
• Testing for heteroskedasticity
• It may still be interesting whether there is heteroskedasticity because then OLS
may not be the most efficient linear estimator anymore.

• Breusch-Pagan test for heteroskedasticity

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 5
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (5 of 18)
• Breusch-Pagan test for heteroskedasticity (cont.)

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 6
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (6 of 18) Hprice1.dta

• Example: Heteroskedasticity in housing price equations

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 7
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (7 of 18)
• The White test for heteroskedasticity

• Disadvantage of this form of the White test


• Including all squares and interactions leads to a large number of estimated
parameters (e.g. k=6 leads to 27 parameters to be estimated).

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 8
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (8 of 18)
• Alternative form of the White test

• Example: Heteroskedasticity in (log) housing price equations

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 9
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (9 of 18)
• Weighted least squares estimation
• Heteroskedasticity is known up to a multiplicative constant

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 10
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (10 of 18)


• Example: Savings and income

• The transformed model is homoskedastic

• If the other Gauss-Markov assumptions hold as well, OLS applied to


the transformed model is the best linear unbiased estimator.
© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 11
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (11 of 18)


• OLS in the transformed model is weighted least squares (WLS)

• Why is WLS more efficient than OLS in the original model?


• Observations with a large variance are less informative than observations with
small variance and therefore should get less weight.
• WLS is a special case of generalized least squares (GLS)

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 12
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (12 of 18)


• Example: Financial wealth equation
Independent Variables (1) (2) (3) (4)
OLS WLS OLS WLS
inc .821 .787 .771 .740
(.104) (.063) (.100) (.064)
(age – 25)2 - - .0251 .0175
(.0043) (.0019)
male - - 2.48 1.84
(2.06) (1.56)
e401k - - 6.89 5.19
(2.29) (1.70)
intercept -10.57 -9.58 -20.98 -16.70
(2.53) (1.65) (3.50) (1.96)
Observations 2,017 2,017 2,017 2,017

R-squared .0827 .0709 .1279 .1115

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 13
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (13 of 18)


• Important special case of heteroskedasticity
• If the observations are reported as averages at the city/county/state/-
country/firm level, they should be weighted by the size of the unit

• If errors are homoskedastic at the individual-level, WLS with weights equal to firm size mi should
be used. If the assumption of homoskedasticity at the individual-level is not exactly right, one can
calculate robust standard errors after WLS (i.e. for the transformed model).

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 14
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Weighted Least Squares: Why and How


• In survey data, individuals are often sampled from population with
different probabilities
• For example, the most poor or rich individuals often has a higher probability to
be sampled.
• If we are computing the mean income, an unbiased estimator is the Horvitz-
Thompson estimator:

1
where 𝜋𝑖 is the sampling probability, and 𝑀 = σ𝑖
𝜋𝑖
• Principle: weight = inverse probability, i.e. Inverse Probability Weighting(IPW)

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 15
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Weighted Least Squares: Why and How

• Similar weighting strategy can be used for survey data in


regression analysis
• Inverse of probability can be used as the weights in regression so
that the regression is more representative.
• Note that the inverse of probability is equivalent to number of
individuals represented by a specific sample.
• For example, if we have 1000 samples in Shanghai, then every
single individual in Shanghai is sampled with probability
1000/24million=1/2400, which means each sample represents
2400 individuals in Shanghai.
• In Stata: [w=swgt]

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 16
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Weighted Least Squares: Why and How


• If the observations are reported as averages at the city/county/state/-
country/firm level, each observation can be view as a single sample
from the city/county/state/-country/firm
• So according to the IPW principle, the weights = size of the unit,
which is equivalent to the weights above.
• But here, the motivation is different: representative v.s. Heteroscedasticity
• Since we don‘t konw whether the homoscedasticity of individuals‘ error term is
satisfied, robust standard errors should be use.
• For example, if the dependent variable if averages at the city level, then
weight=city population.

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 17
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (14 of 18)


• Unknown heteroskedasticity function (feasible GLS)

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 18
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (15 of 18)


• Example: Demand for cigarettes
• Estimation by OLS SMOKE.dta

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 19
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (16 of 18)


• Estimation by FGLS

• Discussion
• The income elasticity is now statistically significant; other coefficients are also
more precisely estimated (without changing qualitative results).

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 20
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (17 of 18)


• What if the assumed heteroskedasticity function is wrong?
• If the heteroskedasticity function is misspecified, WLS is still consistent under
MLR.1 – MLR.4, but robust standard errors should be computed.
• WLS is consistent under MLR.4 but not necessarily under MLR.4‘

• If OLS and WLS produce very different estimates, this typically indicates that
some other assumptions (e.g. MLR.4) are wrong.
• If there is strong heteroskedasticity, it is still often better to use a wrong form of
heteroskedasticity in order to increase efficiency.

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 21
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7e)

Heteroskedasticity (18 of 18)


• WLS in the linear probability model

• Discussion
• Infeasible if LPM predictions are below zero or greater than one.
• If such cases are rare, they may be adjusted to values such as .01/.99.
• Otherwise, it is probably better to use OLS with robust standard errors.

© 2020 Cengage. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a
password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 22

You might also like