0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views

Mid-Year Review Form 2022-2023

Uploaded by

JENY VEV GAYOMA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views

Mid-Year Review Form 2022-2023

Uploaded by

JENY VEV GAYOMA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. Before starting to rate, please fill-in all the necessary data first
2. The ratee must review his/her collected means of verification starting from the open
3. He/she will then put the rating on the RATEE COLUMN
4. The rating will be based on QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, & TIMELINESS (refer to the RPMS T
5. The rater will rate the ratee based on the presented MOVs of ratee during the mid-y
6. The ratings of the rater will be based on QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, & TIMELINESS (refer t
7. The final rating will be entered in under the Mid-Year Review Results column.
8 Print the document using A4 bond paper and sign
Weight per Objective
Objective 1-14 is 7% per objective or 98% of the total rating
Plus Factor or Objective 15 is only 2%
starting from the opening of classes
SS (refer to the RPMS Tool for Teachers I-III or Master Teachers I-IV)
ratee during the mid-year review under RATER COLUMN
& TIMELINESS (refer to the RPMS Tool for Teachers I-III or Master Teachers I-IV)
Results column.
MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Name of Employee: JENY VEV G. DEROY Name of Rater: MUHAJIRIN B. SALI


Position: TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL I
School: WENCESLAO VILLAPA HIGH SCHOOL Rating Period: MID-YEAR
Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Mid-Year Review/ Rating


Weight per Performance
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES Timeline
Objective
Means of Verification (Presented)
Target
Ratee Rater Mid-Year Review Results
Rating Ramarks Rating Ramarks
B KRA 1 Content 1. Applied knowledge of content
A Knowledge and within and across curriculum Please input here the MOVs Quality
S Pedagogy teaching areas. (PPST 1.1.2) 7% that you have presented
I during the Mid-Year Review
C Efficiency
E 2. Used a range of teaching strategies Quality
D that enhance learner achievement in Please input here the MOVs
U literacy and numeracy skills. (PPST 7% that you have presented
C 1.4.2) during the Mid-Year Review Efficiency
A
T
I 3. Applied a range of teaching Quality
O strategies to develop critical and
Please input here the MOVs
N creative thinking, as well as other
7% that you have presented
higher-order thinking skills. (PPST Efficiency
during the Mid-Year Review
S 1.5.2)
E
R KRA 2: 4. Managed classroom structure to
V Quality
Learning engage learners, individually or in
I Environment & groups, in meaningful exploration,
C Diversity of discovery and hands-on activities Please input here the MOVs
E Learners within a range of physical learning 7% that you have presented
S environments. (PPST 2.3.2) during the Mid-Year Review Efficiency

5. Managed learner behavior Quality


constructively by applying positive Please input here the MOVs
and non-violent discipline to ensure 7% that you have presented
learning-focused environments. during the Mid-Year Review Efficiency
(PPST 2.6.2)

6. Used differentiated, Quality


developmentally appropriate learning
experiences to address learners’
gender, needs, strengths, interests Please input here the MOVs
and experiences. (PPST 3.1.2) 7% that you have presented
during the Mid-Year Review Efficiency

KRA 3: 7. Planned, managed and Quality


Curriculum and implemented developmentally
Planning sequenced teaching and learning Please input here the MOVs
processes to meet curriculum 7% that you have presented
requirements and varied teaching MID Year during the Mid-Year Review
contexts. (PPST 4.1.2)
KRA 3: 7. Planned, managed and
Curriculum and implemented developmentally
Planning sequenced teaching and learning Please input here the MOVs
processes to meet curriculum 7% that you have presented
requirements and varied teaching MID Year during the Mid-Year Review Efficiency
contexts. (PPST 4.1.2)

8. Participated in collegial Quality


discussions that use teacher and Please input here the MOVs
learner feedback to enrich teaching 7% that you have presented
practice. (PPST 4.4.2) during the Mid-Year Review Timeliness

9. Selected, developed, organized and Quality


used appropriate teaching and
Please input here the MOVs
learning resources, including ICT, to
7% that you have presented
address learning goals. (PPST 4.5.2) during the Mid-Year Review Efficiency

KRA 4: 10. Designed, selected, organized Quality


Assessment and used diagnostic, formative and
and Reporting summative assessment strategies Please input here the MOVs
consistent with curriculum
7% that you have presented
during the Mid-Year Review Efficiency
requirements. (PPST 5.1.2)

11. Monitored and evaluated learner Quality


progress and achievement using Please input here the MOVs
learner attainment data. (PPST 5.2.2) 7% that you have presented
during the Mid-Year Review Timelines

12. Communicated promptly and Quality


clearly the learners’ needs, progress
and achievement to key Please input here the MOVs
stakeholders, including 7% that you have presented
parents/guardians. (PPST 5.4.2) during the Mid-Year Review Timelines

KRA 5: 13. Applied a personal philosophy of Please input here the MOVs Quality
Personal teaching that is learner-centered. 7% that you have presented
Growth and (PPST 7.1.2) during the Mid-Year Review Timelines
Professional
Development 14. Set professional development Quality
goals based on the Philippine Please input here the MOVs
Professional Standards for Teachers. 7% that you have presented Efficiency
(PPST 7.5.2) during the Mid-Year Review
Timelines
PLUS Factor 15. Performed various related Quality
works / activities that contribute to Please input here the MOVs
the teaching-learning process. 2% that you have presented Efficiency
during the Mid-Year Review
Timelines

JENY VEV G. DEROY MUHAJIRIN B. SALI ARNALDO G. VENTURA, Ph. D


Ratee Rater Approving Authority
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Mid-Year Review Results


DO G. VENTURA, Ph. D
pproving Authority
MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Name of Employee: ARSENIA M. GUDMALIN Name of Rater: LERMA V. DELORETO


Position: MASTER TEACHER I Position: HT-II ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
School: PAARALANG SEKUNDARYA NG HENERAL NAKAR Rating Period: MID-YEAR
Date of Review: FEBRUARY 6, 2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Mid-Year Review/ Rating


Weight per Performance
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES Timeline
Objective
Means of Verification (Presented)
Target
Ratee Rater Mid-Year Review Results
Rating Ramarks Rating Ramarks
B KRA 1 Content 1. Modeled effective applications of
A Knowledge and content knowledge within and across Quality 4 4
S Pedagogy curriculum teaching areas. 7%
I (PPST 1.1.3)
C Efficiency 4 4
E 2. Evaluated with colleagues the Quality
effectiveness of teaching strategies
4 4
D
U that promote learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy.
7%
C Timeliness
A (PPST 1.4.3)
T 4 4
I 3. Developed and applied effective Quality
O teaching strategies to promote
4 4
N critical and creative thinking, as well
as other higher-order thinking skills. 7%
S (PPST 1.5.3) Efficiency
E
R 4 4
V KRA 2: 4. Worked with colleagues to model Quality
I Learning 4 4
and shared effective techniques in
C Environment & the management of classroom
E Diversity of
S structure to engage learners,
Learners individually or in groups, in
meaningful exploration, discovery 7% 7
and hands-on activities within a Efficiency
range of physical learning
environments. (PPST 2.3.3)

4 4
5. Exhibited effective and Quality
constructive behavior management
4 4
skills by applying positive and non-
violent discipline to ensure learning- 7% 7
focused environments. (PPST 2.6.3) Efficiency

4 4
6. Worked with colleagues to share Quality
differentiated, developmentally
4 4
appropriate opportunities to address
learners’ differences in gender,
needs, strengths, interests and
7% 7
experiences. (PPST 3.1.3)
6. Worked with colleagues to share
differentiated, developmentally
appropriate opportunities to address
learners’ differences in gender,
needs, strengths, interests and
7% 7
Efficiency
experiences. (PPST 3.1.3)

4 4
KRA 3: 7. Developed and applied effective Quality
Curriculum and strategies in the planning and 4 4
Planning management of developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning
process to meet curriculum 7% 7
requirements and varied teaching Efficiency
contexts. (PPST 4.1.3)
4 4
8. Reviewed with colleagues, teacher Quality 4 4
and learner feedback to plan, Please input here the MOVs
facilitate, and enrich teaching MID Year 7% that you have presented
practice. (PPST 4.4.3) during the Mid-Year Review Timeliness
4 4
9. Advised and guided colleagues in Quality
the selection, organization,
4 4
development and use of appropriate
teaching and learning resources, 7% 7
including ICT, to address specific Timeliness
learning goals. (PPST 4.5.3)
4 4
KRA 4: 10. Worked collaboratively with Quality
Assessment colleagues to review the design,
4 4
and Reporting selection, organization and use of a
range of effective diagnostic,
formative and summative
assessment strategies consistent 7% 7
with curriculum requirements. (PPST
Timeliness
5.1.3)

4 4
11. Interpreted collaboratively Quality
monitoring and evaluation strategies
4 4
of attainment data to support learner
progress and achievement. (PPST 7% 7
5.2.3) Timelines
4 4
12. Applied skills in the effective Quality
communication of learner needs,
4 4
progress and achievement to key
stakeholders, including parents / 7% 7
guardians. (PPST 5.4.3)
Timelines
4 4
KRA 5: 13. Manifested a learner-centered Quality
Personal teaching philosophy in various
4 4
Growth and aspects of practice and support
Professional colleagues in enhancing their own 7% 7
Development learner-centered teaching Timelines
philosophy. (PPST 7.1.3)
4 4
14. Reflected on the Philippine Quality
Professional Standards for Teachers
4 4
to plan personal professional
development goals and assist
colleagues in planning and achieving 7% 7
their own goals. (PPST 7.5.3)
14. Reflected on the Philippine
Professional Standards for Teachers
to plan personal professional Efficiency 4 4
development goals and assist
colleagues in planning and achieving 7% 7
their own goals. (PPST 7.5.3)
Timelines

4 4
PLUS Factor 15. Performed various related Quality
works /activities that contribute to
4 4
the teaching-learning process. 2% 7 Efficiency 4 4
Timelines 4 4

ARSENIA M. GUDMALIN LERMA V. DELORETO GREGORIO I. RACELIS


Ratee Rater Approving Authority
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Mid-Year Review Results


EGORIO I. RACELIS
pproving Authority

You might also like