An Analysis of English-Speaking Anxiety of University Students in Nangarhar, Afghanistan
An Analysis of English-Speaking Anxiety of University Students in Nangarhar, Afghanistan
RESEARCH PAPER
An Analysis of English-Speaking Anxiety of University Students in
Nangarhar, Afghanistan
Qinaat Saeed*1 Shahabullah2 Samina Rana3
order to learn English, demanding specific attention and instruction at all level of
English language learning. Speaking, being a direct way to convey our thoughts,
ideas, and opinions etc. (Rabiah, 2018) has many elements that hinder our progress
in second or foreign language learning. Foreign language anxiety (stress, worry and
fear of making mistakes among others factors) can have a negative impact on a
speaker's overall performance and prevent him/her from correctly speaking the
foreign language (Jansová, 2021).
Because of speaking anxiety, the crippling worry may increase the actual filter
and establish a "mental barrier" that inhibits understandable input from being
employed for dialectal acquisition (Krashen, 2013). Both sensory emotion (elicited by
external stimuli, such as cool, sweet, fatigued, satiety, and hunger etc.) and cerebral
emotion (intellectual feeling, social feeling, ethical feeling, aesthetic feeling, and
definite feeling etc.) on a broader or weaker level change the physical or mental
activity of an individual making a student’s self (Sadapotto, Syamsu, Usman,
Darmiani & Nadirah, 2022). When it comes to learning a foreign language, students'
emotions are more discouraging than encouraging. Anxiety is one of the emotional
states that makes such a process harder. Anxiety can be classified as a sensation of
stress, concern, or worry, and it will obstruct learners' capacity to function well in a
foreign language classroom. According to Oxford and Ehrman (1992, p.60) "Most
linguistic research reveals a negative association between anxiety and performance".
Literature Review
426
Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review (PLHR) July-September, 2022, Vol. 6, No. 3
Nervousness is linked to both productive (speaking and writing) and receptive skills
(listening and reading). Speaking skill, no doubt is one of the most important skills
among others. But speaking could lead to a high level of anxiety because feeling
stressed, frightened, and uncomfortable affect speaking skills more than any other
skills of the targeted language (Suleimenova, 2013). Although, there is no universal
definition for foreign language anxiety, there are a few that are commonly used.
Many people have a mental barrier to learning a foreign language, while being
competent learners in other circumstances and having a genuine affection for
speakers of the target language. As a consequence, the issue here is a specific type of
anxiety reaction that obstructs the entire effort and ability to function properly in
various settings involving a foreign language (Horwitz, Horwitz & Cope, 1986).
Learners, teachers, and the way instructions are delivered are all common
sources of language anxiety (Young, 1991). Spielberger and Vagg (1995) asserted that
symptoms including muscular trembling, perspiration of the palms and foreheads,
and flushing of the neck and cheeks are all signs of worry. According to Liebert and
Morris (1967), the two forms of anxiety reactions, i.e., emotional (characterized by
physiological and behavioral responses such as squirming and hesitating) and agony
(characterized by a cognitive response or active mental activity) were recognized.
These intellectual or mental effects may be observed only under more controlled
situations (Spielberger, 1972). Learning a language is different in different situations.
Javed, Eng, Mohamed and Sam (2013) looked into the relationship between two
crucial aspects in English learning, i.e., motivation and nervous situations. Optimism
and anxiety are the two measures on which the official language is based. As pointed
out and examined, Pakistani ESL students' opinions toward characterizing their
status as non-English natives are influenced by sociolinguistic, geographical,
economic, and political rather than linguistic considerations. That is why, in a non-
native speaking environment, intelligibility and comprehensibility are checked in the
perspective of classroom anxiety (Wilang & Singhasiri, 2017).
According to Kitano (2001), gender and anxiety levels are linked along with
number of learners and social and environmental factors (Kunt & Tüm, 2010) and
personality factors (Kráová & Sorádová, 2015). “Females are more passionately
developed than males in their responses to very frightening and relaxed settings"
(Spielberger, Jacobs, Russell & Crane, 1983, p. 19), on the other hand, male learners
were shown to be more anxious when they regarded their spoken language to be less
proficient than many others; however, no such association was identified among
female students (Matsuda & Gobel, 2004). On the opposite, Machida (2001), looked at
gender differences for foreign language learning in a classroom environment and
anxiety and discovered that female students were more worried than male students.
Speech concerns in ESL classrooms have been investigated identifying the impact of
gender on speech fears among students (Hwa & Peck, 2017).
427
Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review (PLHR) July-September, 2022, Vol. 6, No. 3
Anxiety does not always have a negative effect on language learning (Moyer,
2008), because "facilitating anxiety has a favorable effect on oral performance"
(Young, 1990, p. 541). Horwitz (2010), on the other hand, claims that this would
require language learners to feel slightly worried in order to work more. According
to Scovel (1978), anxiety may facilitate a work if it is relatively easy; on the other side,
the more difficult the task, the more detrimental it is. Scovel (1978, p.138), added that
good performance in any (music; sport; language learning, particularly speaking)
"requires enough anxiety to evoke the neuromuscular system to optimized levels of
performance, but not so much that the complex neuromuscular systems underlying
these skills are disrupted". We can consider anxiety as a beneficial aspect in language
learning, according to Welsch, Terrell and Nadolski (1992), if by anxiety we mean
"attentiveness" or "alertness." The learners require input, but they must also pay
attention to that material in order to learn a language effectively. On the other hand,
Krashen and Terrel (1983), claims that there is no benefit to anxiety in language
acquisition, while there may be for language learning. There has been no conclusion
on general aspects affecting the issue of foreign language anxiety due to ambiguous
results in numerous studies. These two aspects should maintain a specific balance in
order to keep the organism in constant balance with its changing environment.
429
Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review (PLHR) July-September, 2022, Vol. 6, No. 3
The population of this study was the private sector universities’ students of
Nangarhar, Afghanistan. A sample of four private universities in Nangarhar province
was selected through a non-random convenient sampling technique, i.e., Khurasan,
Alfalah, Al Taqwa, and Rokhan. Form these universities, a sample of two hundred
students was selected having equal number of male and female students. The study
was carried out using a survey descriptive research design to describe the
characteristics of anxiety selected sample (Gay, Mills & Airasian, 2011). The data was
collected through a five Likert scale questionnaire having 33 items adapted from
Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope (1986). The questionnaire contained questions about
communication apprehension, test anxiety and fear of negative evaluation. Out of
these items, thirteen items focused on comprehension apprehension, thirteen on fear
of negative evaluation and seven on test anxiety. The researchers removed and
clarified the ambiguities in the questionnaire. Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope’s (1986),
Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) was used an analytical
framework in the present study. FLCAS consists of three domains: communication
apprehension, test anxiety, and fear of negative assessment/evaluation.
Figure 1: Model of foreign language anxiety (Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope, 1986)
430
Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review (PLHR) July-September, 2022, Vol. 6, No. 3
The means in the above table for each question were higher than 2.50 for all
questions showing that most of the students had anxiety for specific domain of
communication apprehension. The anxiety is more when the students speak in
English class without preparation. It means that preparation before class reduces
anxiety and students if not anxious do not forget what they have learnt. They do not
feel shy in the class and feel normal and could perform better even if they are asked
by teachers in front of the class. With preparation, they become able to face the
teachers and classmates and so, their speaking anxiety reduces and they perform
better. The overall mean in the following table also shows the mean of means which
is higher than 3 showing anxiety for communication apprehension.
Table 2
The overall descriptive statistics of communication apprehension
Domain N Mean Std. Deviation
Communication apprehension
200 3.0535 .57704
domain
The mean of the means above is over 3 suggesting that as a whole, the students
feel anxiety in communication apprehension and would affect their speaking
proficiency. Similarly, the following table shows the results for the second domain of
language anxiety, i.e., fear of negative evaluation in thirteen questions of the
questionnaire.
431
Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review (PLHR) July-September, 2022, Vol. 6, No. 3
Table 3
Descriptive statistics of fear of negative evaluation domain
Std.
Items Mean
Deviation
I feel worried about making mistakes in English class. 3.41 1.028
I feel worried when my classmates correct my answers in
2.75 1.194
English class.
I always feel that my classmates speak English better than me. 3.15 1.185
I feel worried when I make grammatical mistakes while
3.12 1.172
speaking in English class.
I always feel that my classmates will laugh at me when I speak
2.75 1.184
in English class.
I always make pronunciation errors while speaking in English
2.80 1.004
class.
I feel afraid that my classmates will criticize me during group
2.72 1.228
discussion because of my English.
I am worried about English teacher who might have negative
2.55 1.074
feelings about me due to my bad performance in English class.
I forget the answers while speaking English if students and
2.93 1.126
teacher keep looking at me.
I feel nervous when the teacher asks me questions, I haven’t
3.34 1.068
prepared in advance.
I am worried from the negative feedback I get from my
3.46 3.138
classmates in English class.
I am worried from the negative feedback I get from my teacher
3.21 1.110
in English class.
I feel worry about the impression I leave among my classmates
3.05 1.033
after speaking English.
Like table 1, the means in the above table for each question are higher than
2.50 for all questions showing that most of the students had anxiety of fear of negative
evaluation. Most of the worries here too about lack of preparation and the negative
feedback provided by teachers in the presence of classmates. This anxiety is because
of the fear of making mistakes and not having a positive impression on the classmates.
In such a state of anxiety, even the look of the teacher and classmates and their
corrections of mistakes in minded by students. For this self-perceived supposition of
creating positive impression on other ideally, the performance is influenced and the
students do not perform well in language class. The overall mean in the following
table also shows the mean of means which is higher than 3 showing anxiety of fear of
negative evaluation.
Table 4
Overall descriptive statistics of fear of negative evaluation
Domain N Mean Std. Deviation
Fear of Negative
200 3.0204 .56839
Evaluation
The domain of test anxiety was analyzed showing greater anxiety for
students. The following table shows the results of test anxiety domain of the seven
questions in questionnaire about this domain.
Table 5
Descriptive statistics of test anxiety domain
Items Mean Std. Deviation
I feel nervous before English test. 3.12 1.045
432
Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review (PLHR) July-September, 2022, Vol. 6, No. 3
The means in the above table for each question were higher than 3 for all
questions showing that most of the students had test anxiety greater than other types
of anxiety. The test anxiety (because of nature of our tests) is so much that students
in spite of preparation feel anxious for test. This worry is mostly because of the fear
of having bad grades for not performing good in tests. These like emotions affect their
performance negatively. This anxiety is felt before, during and even after the tests.
The overall mean in the following table also shows the mean of means which is higher
than 3.2 showing greater anxiety for test anxiety.
Table 6
Overall descriptive statistics of test anxiety
Domain N Mean Std. Deviation
Test Anxiety 200 3.2543 .59880
The above mean is higher than the mean for other domains of anxiety
suggesting that students are mostly worried about their performance in tests. An
independent sample T-test was applied to calculate the statistically significant gender
differences in anxiety level of the male and female participants. The gender
differences in communication apprehension is given in the following table.
Table 7
Results for Gender differences in communication apprehension
Male Female CI
95%
Variables M SD M SD t(198) P L U
Sources 37.3 8.0 37.5 8.4 -.14 .88 -2.4 2.1
The above table shows that there was no significant difference in the anxiety
of communication apprehension between the male and female participants. The p
value is greater than the significance level (p>0.05) and the null hypothesis is accepted
that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms
of communication apprehension and both the groups have almost the same level of
comprehension apprehension in English speaking. Similarly, the independent t-test
was also applied on the data for gender differences in fear of negative evaluation. The
following table shows the results for this fear.
Table 8
Results for genders differences in fear of negative evaluation
Male Female CI
95%
Variables M SD M SD t(198) P L U
The above table shows that there was no significant difference in the anxiety
of fear of negative evaluation between the male and female participants. The p value
is greater than the significance level (p>0.05) and the null hypothesis is accepted that
433
Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review (PLHR) July-September, 2022, Vol. 6, No. 3
there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of
fear of negative evaluation and both the groups have almost the same level of fear of
negative evaluation in English speaking. The gender differences for test anxiety was
also calculated by an independent t-test. The following table shows the difference.
Table 9
Results for gender differences in test anxiety
Male Female CI
95%
Variables M SD M SD t(198) P L U
The above table shows that there was significant difference in test anxiety
between the male and female participants. The p value is less than the significance
level (p>0.05) and the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is
accepted that there was statistically significant difference between the two groups in
terms of test anxiety. The mean for male participants is greater than the mean for
female participants indicating that male students have greater test anxiety than
female students. The results show that male participants were more anxious about
English test than female students. The only difference that we found out in the data
was the difference in test anxiety.
Conclusion
The aim for the current research study was to explore English speaking
anxiety and other aspects of anxiety among undergraduate Afghan learners in private
sector universities in Nangarhar, Afghanistan. Students during their production part
of language, feel more anxiety in speaking than writing being engaged in face to face
interaction and having limited time for thinking and self-adjustment. The neglect of
this skills is another reason for lack of proficiency in this regard. All the three domains
of English language anxiety (communication apprehension, fear of negative
evaluation and test anxiety) were measured showing anxiety in English speaking for
these students. The higher mean of anxiety in all domains can affect students’
performance during speaking in English classes which could lead to nervousness
when they come to class without preparation and they can forget things during
English speaking when the teachers ask them during classroom’s activities. As a
result, their heartbeats may become faster and they may feel shy while speaking
English in front of the class which make them unable to express their ideas properly
434
Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review (PLHR) July-September, 2022, Vol. 6, No. 3
in English due to lack of self-confidence while using this language skill. Both male
and female participants felt almost the same level of communication apprehension
and fear of negative evaluation while speaking English and no statistically significant
difference was found in the data. But when it came to test anxiety, the female students
performed better than male students and were less anxious about their test having
less test anxiety. The findings of this research show that Afghan learners are anxious
as a result of a variety of problems that are essential to be addressed by Afghan higher
authorities so they can be provided with grounds to reduce their nervousness. This
study will also help EFL lecturers in Afghanistan, specifically in Nangarhar province,
to understand the reasons that cause anxiety. The findings may also help Afghan EFL
teachers to design their English courses in the light of the suggestions of the present
study and adopting appropriate teaching techniques to reduce speaking anxiety in
the class. The findings are helpful for researchers in the field of examining
nervousness of students during learning a foreign language.
435
Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review (PLHR) July-September, 2022, Vol. 6, No. 3
References
Ahmed, N., Pathan, Z. H., & Khan, F. S. (2017). Exploring the causes of English
language speaking anxiety among postgraduate students of university of
Balochistan, Pakistan. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(2), 99-105.
Choy, Y., Fyer, A. J., & Lipsitz, J. D. (2007). Treatment of specific phobia in
adults. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(3), 266-286.
Chan, D. Y. C., & Wu, G. C. (2004). A study of foreign language anxiety of EFL
elementary school students in Taipei County. Journal of National Taipei Teachers’
College, 17(2), 287-320.
Dewaele, J. M., & Al-Saraj, T. M. (2013). Foreign language anxiety: Some conceptual
and methodological issues. Journal of Psychology, 68(3), 71-78.
Eddraoui, B., & Wirza, Y. (2020). Speaking anxiety of EFL high school students:
Indonesian and Moroccan cases. In 4th Asian Education Symposium (aes 2019) (pp.
349-356). Atlantis press.
Frantz, J., Marlow, A., & Wathen, J. (2015). Communication apprehension and its
relationship to gender and college year. Journal of Undergraduate Research at
Minnesota State University, Mankato, 5(1), 7-15.
Gaibani, A., & Elmenfi, F. (2016). Age as an affective factor in influencing public
speaking anxiety of English language learners at Omar Al-Mukhtar
University. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(2), 179-182.
Garmston, R. J., & Wellman, B. M. (1992). How to make presentations that teach and
transform. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for
analysis and applications. Pearson Higher Ed.
literature department of university, negeri padang and its causal factors. Journal
of English Language Teaching, 9(3), 580-592.
Hwa, S. P., & Peck, W. K. (2017). Gender differences in speaking anxiety among
English as a second language learners in a Malaysian tertiary context. International
Journal for Studies on Children, Women, Elderly and Disabled, 2(6), 108-117.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom
anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132.
Javed, M., Eng, L. S., Mohamed, A. R., & Sam, R. (2013). Comparative study of the
Pakistani and Indonesian student’s anxiety towards the English language
learning. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 18(11), 1563-1572.
Karatas, H., Alci, B., Bademcioglu, M., & Ergin, A. (2016). An Investigation into
University Students Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 232, 382-388.
Kunt, N., Tüm, D. O. (2010). Non- feelings of foreign language anxiety. World
Conference on Educational Sciences, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4672-4676.
Kitano, K. (2001). Anxiety in the college Japanese language classroom. The Modern
Language Journal, 85(4), 549-566.
Krashen, S. and Terrel, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the
classroom. Oxford: Pegamon Express.
Liebert, R. M., & Morris, L. W. (1967). Cognitive and emotional components of test
anxiety: A distinction and some initial data. Psychological Reports, 20(3), 975-978.
Liu, M., & Huang, W. (2011). An exploration of foreign language anxiety and English
learning motivation. Education Research International, 2011. 1-9.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Language anxiety: Its relationship to other
anxieties and to processing in native and second languages. Language
Learning, 41(4), 513-534.
Matsuda, S., & Gobel, P. (2004). Anxiety and predictors of performance in the foreign
language classroom. System, 32(1), 21-36.
437
Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review (PLHR) July-September, 2022, Vol. 6, No. 3
McCroskey, L., Richmond, V., & McCroskey, J. (2002). The scholarship of teaching
and learning: Contributions from the discipline of
communication. Communication Education, 51(4), 383-391.
Richmond, V. P., Heisel, A. M., Smith Jr, R. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). The impact
of communication apprehension and fear of talking with a physician on perceived
medical outcomes. Communication Research Reports, 15(4), 344-353.
Sadapotto, A., Syamsu, T., Usman, U., Darmiani, D., & Nadirah, N. (2022).
Investigating of lecturers and learners’ foreign language anxiety in E-learning
interaction. La Ogi: English Language Journal, 8(1), 17-24.
Saltan, F. (2003). EFL speaking anxiety: How do students and teachers perceive
it? [Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University].
Scovel, T. (1978). The effect of effect on foreign language learning: A review of the
anxiety research. Language Learning, 28(1), 129-142.
438
Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review (PLHR) July-September, 2022, Vol. 6, No. 3
Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G., Russell, S., & Crane, R. S. (1983). Assessment of anger:
The state- trait anger scale. Advances in Personality Assessment, 2, 161-189.
Spielberger, C. D., & Vagg, P. R. (Eds.). (1995). Test anxiety: Theory, assessment, and
treatment. Taylor & Francis.
Weda, S., & Sakti, A. E. F. (2018). The relationship between study anxiety and
academic performance among English students. XLinguage" European Scientific
Language Journal", 11(2), 718-727.
Welsch, R. L., Terrell, J., & Nadolski, J. A. (1992). Language and culture on the north
coast of New Guinea. American Anthropologist, 94(3), 568-600.
Yalçın, Ö., & İnceçay, V. (2014). Foreign language speaking anxiety: The case of
spontaneous speaking activities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(4),
2620-2624.
Zhiping, D., & Paramasivam, S. (2013). Anxiety of speaking English in class among
international students in a Malaysian university. International Journal of Education
and Research, 1(11), 1-16.
439