Disk Scheduling Algorithms

Disk scheduling is done by operating systems to schedule I/O requests arriving for the disk. Disk
scheduling is also known as I/O Scheduling.

Importance of Disk Scheduling in Operating System

 Multiple I/O requests may arrive by different processes and only one I/O request can be served at a
time by the disk controller. Thus other I/O requests need to wait in the waiting queue and need to
be scheduled.

 Two or more requests may be far from each other so this can result in greater disk arm movement.

 Hard drives are one of the slowest parts of the computer system and thus need to be accessed in
an efficient manner.

Here, we will cover the following Topics in Disk Scheduling.

 Important Terms Associated with Disk Scheduling

 Disk Scheduling Algorithms

o FCFS (First Come First Serve)

o SSTF (Shortest Seek Time First)

o SCAN (Elevator Algorithm)

o C-SCAN (CIrcular SCAN)

o LOOK

o C-LOOK

o RSS

o LIFO (Last-In First-Out)

o N-Step SCAN

o F-SCAN

Key Terms Associated with Disk Scheduling

 Seek Time: Seek time is the time taken to locate the disk arm to a specified track where the
data is to be read or written. So the disk scheduling algorithm that gives a minimum average
seek time is better.

 Rotational Latency: Rotational Latency is the time taken by the desired sector of the disk
to rotate into a position so that it can access the read/write heads. So the disk scheduling
algorithm that gives minimum rotational latency is better.

1
  Transfer Time: Transfer time is the time to transfer the data. It depends on the rotating
speed of the disk and the number of bytes to be transferred.

 Disk Access Time:

Disk Access Time = Seek Time + Rotational Latency + Transfer Time

Total Seek Time = Total head Movement * Seek Time

Disk Access Time and Disk Response Time

 Disk Response Time: Response Time is the average time spent by a request waiting to
perform its I/O operation. The average Response time is the response time of all requests.
Variance Response Time is the measure of how individual requests are serviced with respect
to average response time. So the disk scheduling algorithm that gives minimum variance
response time is better.

Disk Scheduling Algorithms

There are several Disk Several Algorithms. We will discuss each one of them.

FCFS (First Come First Serve)

FCFS is the simplest of all Disk Scheduling Algorithms. In FCFS, the requests are addressed in the
order they arrive in the disk queue. Let us understand this with the help of an example.

2
First Come First Serve

Example:

Suppose the order of request is- (82,170,43,140,24,16,190) And current position of Read/Write
head is: 50

So, total overhead movement (total distance covered by the disk arm) = (82-50) + (170-82) + (170-
43) + (140-43) + (140-24) + (24-16) + (190-16) =642

Advantages of FCFS

Here are some of the advantages of First Come First Serve.

 Every request gets a fair chance

 No indefinite postponement

Disadvantages of FCFS

Here are some of the disadvantages of First Come First Serve.

 Does not try to optimize seek time

 May not provide the best possible service

SSTF (Shortest Seek Time First)

In SSTF (Shortest Seek Time First), requests having the shortest seek time are executed first. So,
the seek time of every request is calculated in advance in the queue and then they are scheduled
according to their calculated seek time. As a result, the request near the disk arm will get executed
first. SSTF is certainly an improvement over FCFS as it decreases the average response time and
increases the throughput of the system. Let us understand this with the help of an example.

Example:

3
Shortest Seek Time First

Suppose the order of request is- (82,170,43,140,24,16,190). And current position of Read/Write
head is: 50

So, total overhead movement (total distance covered by the disk arm) = (50-43)+(43-24)+(24-
16)+(82-16)+(140-82)+(170-140)+(190-170) =208

Advantages of Shortest Seek Time First

Here are some of the advantages of Shortest Seek Time First.

 The average Response Time decreases

 Throughput increases

Disadvantages of Shortest Seek Time First

Here are some of the disadvantages of Shortest Seek Time First.

 Overhead to calculate seek time in advance

 Can cause Starvation for a request if it has a higher seek time as compared to incoming
requests

 The high variance of response time as SSTF favors only some requests

SCAN

In the SCAN algorithm the disk arm moves in a particular direction and services the requests
coming in its path and after reaching the end of the disk, it reverses its direction and again services
the request arriving in its path. So, this algorithm works as an elevator and is hence also known as
an elevator algorithm. As a result, the requests at the midrange are serviced more and those
arriving behind the disk arm will have to wait.

Example:

4
SCAN Algorithm

Suppose the requests to be addressed are-82,170,43,140,24,16,190. And the Read/Write arm is at

50, and it is also given that the disk arm should move “towards the larger value”.

Therefore, the total overhead movement (total distance covered by the disk arm) is calculated as =
(199-50) + (199-16) = 332

Advantages of SCAN Algorithm

Here are some of the advantages of the SCAN Algorithm.

 High throughput

 Low variance of response time

 Average response time

Disadvantages of SCAN Algorithm

Here are some of the disadvantages of the SCAN Algorithm.

 Long waiting time for requests for locations just visited by disk arm

C-SCAN

In the SCAN algorithm, the disk arm again scans the path that has been scanned, after reversing its
direction. So, it may be possible that too many requests are waiting at the other end or there may be
zero or few requests pending at the scanned area.

These situations are avoided in the CSCAN algorithm in which the disk arm instead of reversing its
direction goes to the other end of the disk and starts servicing the requests from there. So, the disk
arm moves in a circular fashion and this algorithm is also similar to the SCAN algorithm hence it is
known as C-SCAN (Circular SCAN).

5
Example:

Circular SCAN

Suppose the requests to be addressed are-82,170,43,140,24,16,190. And the Read/Write arm is at

50, and it is also given that the disk arm should move “towards the larger value”.

So, the total overhead movement (total distance covered by the disk arm) is calculated as:

= (199-50) + (199-0) + (43-0) = 391

Advantages of C-SCAN Algorithm

Here are some of the advantages of C-SCAN.

 Provides more uniform wait time compared to SCAN.

LOOK
LOOK Algorithm is similar to the SCAN disk scheduling algorithm except for the difference that
the disk arm in spite of going to the end of the disk goes only to the last request to be serviced in
front of the head and then reverses its direction from there only. Thus it prevents the extra delay
which occurred due to unnecessary traversal to the end of the disk.

Example:

6
LOOK Algorithm

Suppose the requests to be addressed are-82,170,43,140,24,16,190. And the Read/Write arm is at

50, and it is also given that the disk arm should move “towards the larger value”.

So, the total overhead movement (total distance covered by the disk arm) is calculated as:

= (190-50) + (190-16) = 314

C-LOOK
As LOOK is similar to the SCAN algorithm, in a similar way, C-LOOK is similar to the CSCAN
disk scheduling algorithm. In CLOOK, the disk arm in spite of going to the end goes only to the
last request to be serviced in front of the head and then from there goes to the other end’s last
request. Thus, it also prevents the extra delay which occurred due to unnecessary traversal to the
end of the disk.

Example:

1. Suppose the requests to be addressed are-82,170,43,140,24,16,190. And the Read/Write arm

is at 50, and it is also given that the disk arm should move “towards the larger value”

7
C-LOOK

So, the total overhead movement (total distance covered by the disk arm) is calculated as

= (190-50) + (190-16) + (43-16) = 341