DeviGyro Notes
DeviGyro Notes
CONTENTS
1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 2
2 Battery................................................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Lithium primary ............................................................................................................................. 2
2.2 Survey time ................................................................................................................................... 2
2.3 Quantity of batteries ..................................................................................................................... 2
3 Memory................................................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Survey time ................................................................................................................................... 3
4 Vertical surveys ..................................................................................................................................... 3
5 Survey procedure .................................................................................................................................. 4
5.1 Magnet .......................................................................................................................................... 4
5.2 Latitude input ................................................................................................................................ 4
5.3 Rotating the gyro, scale factor error ............................................................................................. 4
5.4 Oscillation filter ............................................................................................................................. 5
1 INTRODUCTION
The DeviGyro was officially introduced to the market in late 2019. It is a standard type of reference gyro,
of which there have been a number on the market for over a decade. After several months of use
various issues and features of the DeviGyro have become apparent and the most notable are
summarized here:
• The system calibration is poor, leading to the recommendation to rotate the tool during
surveying. This leads to excessive scale factor error in results and also the need for an ad-hoc
“oscillation filter” to try and remove the gross effect of the rotation on the poorly aligned gyro.
• The small amount of memory means the survey time is highly limited compared to standard
memory reference gyros.
• The primary lithium battery has problems with survey time, quantity of batteries needed,
transport and disposal.
• Vertical survey procedures are cumbersome and error prone.
• Latitude input for a reference gyro points to legacy effects from previous failed DeviGyro
incarnations.
2 BATTERY
• Deep surveys
• Surveys where gyro must be started and wait for a long period before surveying
• Oil & gas drop gyro surveys
• Surveys where waiting at bottom of the hole for hours is needed
• Surveys where there is a risk of delay while in hole
4 VERTICAL SURVEYS
The only way of doing a vertical or near vertical survey is to use a method like the old GyroSmart
“direction transfer”. This involves lying the tool horizontally in v-blocks, such that the tool points in a
defined reference direction. A reference mark is taken in this position and then the tool is lifted to the
hole collar for surveying.
There are problems with this method which make it error prone. The tool must be moved carefully from
the v-blocks to the hole collar to avoid high rates. Devico’s own procedure states that the tool should
not exceed rates of 80 deg/s in moving to the collar, which is a very low rate easily exceeded when
moving the tool by hand. Errors in this type of procedure can easily be on the order of a few degrees.
Another potential issue is that it is not clear if it is possible to do vertical orientation as there is no part
of the procedure for ensuring an oriented highside to later reference the toolface.
5.1 MAGNET
Like other Devico survey tools, the DeviGyro is started using an external magnet held over the tool. This
introduces one more piece of equipment to the kit. The magnet itself is not large and the question
arises, what happens if the magnet is lost or misplaced? Can the gyro be started in the field if a magnet
is not available? Other gyro systems typically start communicating once the power is connected.
Presumably, the low battery capacity of the DeviGyro rules this out, in case too much time is taken in
starting the gyro before actual surveying takes place.
Deliberately causing large rotations of the gyro instrument is discouraged by most manufacturers as it
introduces unavoidable scale factor error in the results. No information about the typical scale factor
error of the DeviGyro is available but it can be assumed to be on the order of 0.1% or more in downhole
situations. The recommended turn rate is about 120 deg per 3 meters of survey. For just a 100 meter
survey would then ideally rotate the gyro 4000 deg during the survey, introducing an error of 4 deg or
more from SFE.
The only reason to induce rotations during the survey is to try and eliminate problems from a poor
system calibration. A poor system calibration means that the rotation axes of the gyro component are
not well-aligned with tool itself and measure slightly incorrect rotations along each axis. This usually
expresses itself in poor results and “spiralling” of the azimuth and inclination angles.
This clearly is a pronounced and remarkable effect in the DeviGyro, as a special post-processing filter has
been introduced to try and deal with the effects of the poor system calibration and deliberate rotation,
see the next section “Oscillation filter”.
• There are clearly some swings left, as seen in the right-hand plot below. A smoothing filter
cannot fully remove all effects.
• The azimuth blows out at the end of the survey in the “in” run.
• Note that the unfiltered “out” run had a large error in azimuth at the collar, probably due to
misalignment cause by the poor system calibration.
• The filter does not know which effects are “swings” and which are actually features of the hole,
so it will inevitable smooth out features of the hole.