Module 1
Module 1
• Applicable for developmental activities which involves plans, programs and policies.
Salient features of EIA
• It identifies the possible positive and negative impacts which may be short term and
long term.
• The opinion of public is considered for conducting EIA, so the decision taken about the
commencement of new project will be more environment friendly.
Goals of EIA
• Resources conservation
• Waste minimization
• Recovery of byproduct
• Efficient use of equipment
• Sustainable development
EVOLUTION OF EIA
Evolution of EIA world wide
• First introduced in United States of America through its National Environmental
Protection Act(NEPA) of 1969.
• Canada, Australia, the Netherlands and Japan adopted EIA legislation in 1973,1974,
1981 and 1984, respectively.
• In July 1985, the European Community(EC) issued a directive making environmental
assessments mandatory for certain categories of projects.
• In Asia and the Pacific region, Thailand and the Philippines have long established
procedures for EIA.
• EIA was made mandatory in SriLanka in 1984.
• The EIA process in Africa is sketchy, although a number of nations including Rwanda,
Botswana and Sudan have some experience of EIA.
• This cess is collected with a view to augment the resources of the Central Board and
the State Boards for the prevention and control of water pollution constituted under
the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.
• The Act was last amended in 2003.
• One of the important provision of the Water Act, 1974 is to maintain and restore the
‘wholesomeness’ of our aquatic resources.
• Under Water Act 1974, Sewage or pollutants cannot be discharged into water bodies
including lakes and it is the duty of the state pollution control board to intervene and
stop such activity.
• The Act has provisions for funds, budgets, accounts, and audit of the Central and State
Pollution Control Boards.
• The Act prohibits disposal of any poisonous, noxious or polluting matter to the flow of
water in a stream. However, dumping of any material into a stream for the purpose of
reclamation of land is not considered an offense.
• The Act provides for severe and deterrent punishments for violation of the Act which
includes fine and imprisonment. Anyone failing to abide by the laws of under is liable
for imprisonment under Section 24 & Section 43 ranging from not less than one year
and six months to six years along with monetary fines.
• The EPA empowers the Centre to “take all such measures as it deems necessary” in
the domain of environmental protection.
• Under the law, it can coordinate and execute nationwide programmes and plans to
further environmental protection.
• It can mandate environmental quality standards, particularly those concerning the
emission or discharge of environmental pollutants.
• This law can impose restrictions on the location of industries.
• The law gives the government the power of entry for examination, testing of
equipment and other purposes and power to analyze the sample of air, water, soil or
any other substance from any place.
• The EPA explicitly bars the discharge of environmental pollutants in excess of
prescribed regulatory standards.
• There is also in place a specific provision for handling hazardous substances, which is
prohibited unless in compliance with regulatory requirements.
• The Act empowers any person, apart from authorised government officers, to file a
complaint in a court regarding any contravention of the provisions of the Act.
Environmental standards for water
STREAM STANDARDS
• Under the authority of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of 1981, India’s
Central Pollution Control Board sets national ambient air quality standards and is
responsible for both testing air quality and assisting governments in planning to meet
such standards. State Pollution Control Boards are permitted to set stricter standards
than those in effect nationally.
Environmental standards for AIR
NOISE
Schedule 2:
• (Application form) industry should submit application form for the environmental
clearance to Union Ministry of Environment and Forests.
Schedule 3:
All projects and activities are broadly categorized into two categories - Category A and
Category B based on
1.Project screening:
• Screening often results in a categorization of the project and from this a decision is
made on whether or not a full EIA is to be carried out.
2.Scoping:
• It is the process of determining which are the most critical issues to study and will
involve community participation to some degree.
• It is at this early stage that EIA can most strongly influence the outline proposal.
The key benefits of scoping include:
• Early stakeholder identification, engagement, input and identification of issues of
concern.
• An assessment focused on key, likely significant impacts on known biodiversity, their
inter-relationships and sensitivities.
• Early identification of existing data and data gaps.
• Early identification of the need for seasonally dependent surveys so that they can be
accommodated in the schedule of work.
3. Consideration of alternatives:
• This seeks to ensure that the proponent has considered other feasible approaches,
including alternative project locations, scales, processes, layouts, operating condition
and the no-action option.
4. Description of the project/development action:
• This step seeks to clarify the purpose and rationale of the project and understand its
various characteristics, including the stages of development, location and processes.
5.Description of the environmental baseline:
• This includes the establishment of both the present and future state of the
environment, in the absence of the project, taking in to account the changes resulting
from natural events and from other human activities.
6.Identification of key impacts:
• This brings together the previous steps with a view to ensuring that all potentially
significant environmental impacts (adverse and beneficial) are identified and taken
into account in the process.
• This seeks to assess the relative significance of the predicted impacts to allow a focus
on key adverse impacts.
• Formal definition of Significance is the product of consequence and likelihood as
Significance = consequence X Likelihood
9.Mitigation:
• This involves the introduction of measures to avoid, reduce, remedy or compensate
for any significant adverse impacts.
10.Public consultation and participation:
• It ensure quality, comprehensiveness, and effectiveness of EIA, and that the public
views are adequately taken into consideration in the decision making process.
11.(Environment Impact Statement)EIS presentation:
• This is a vital step in the process. If done badly, much good work in the EIA may be
negated.
12.Review of EIA report:
• This involves a systematic appraisal of the quality of the EIS, as a contribution to the
decision-making process.
13.Decision making:
• At this stage, decisions are made by the relevant authority of the EIS (including
consultation responses) together with other material considerations as to whether to
accept, defer or reject the project.
14.Post-decision monitoring:
• This involves the recording of outcomes associated with development impacts, after
the decision to proceed with the project. It can contribute to effective project
management.
15.Auditing:
• This follows monitoring and involves comparing actual out comes with predicted
outcomes, and can be used to assess the quality of predictions and the effectiveness
of mitigation. It provides a vital step in the EIA learning process.