Jiang2013 2
Jiang2013 2
ABSTRACT
Three wetting methods are frequently used for polluted insulators in artificial fog tests, i.e.
cold fog, steam fog and mixture fog. IEC recommended the steam fog wetting method.
However, experimental experience shows that, it is difficult to control wetting time with this
steam input rate. In addition, the temperature in climate chamber rises over the duration of
the test. Both factors make the steam fog test less representative. Porcelain and glass
insulator strings of 3 units are wetted by ultrasonic fog in an artificial climate chamber. The
flashover performances of polluted insulators are studied. The test results revealed that the
relationships between flashover voltage and Salt Deposit Density (SDD) can be expressed as
negative exponential functions for porcelain and glass insulators. However, the fitting
formulas, which are simulated ac pollution flashover voltages at various pollution degrees for
the same type of insulator, are consistent at various conductivities of the applied water.
Moreover, the relationships between flashover voltage and conductivity of the applied water
can also be expressed as a negative exponential function.
Index Terms — Power system, insulators, wetting method, ultrasonic fog, flashover
voltage, flashover characteristics.
2.3.3 WETTING
After 24-h natural drying, the pollution layer on the insulators
was wetted by ultrasonic fog generated by arrays of ultrasonic
fog nozzles fed with water. In this paper, the conductivities of
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of the artificial climate chamber in
Chongqing University.
the applied water (corrected to the values at 20 °C) were 400,
50 2500uS/cm
400uS/cm
3 TEST RESULTS AND ANALYSES
40
3.1 TEST RESULTS
The flashover tests of three types of polluted porcelain
and glass insulator strings of 3 units have been carried out 30
in the artificial climate chamber. And the average
flashover voltages Uav (in kilovolts) are shown in Table 2
at various pollution levels (SDD were 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 20
0.20 mg/cm2, respectively, the ratio of SDD to NSDD is 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 2
Salt desposit density, SDD (mg/cm )
0.20
1:8) and conductivities of the applied water (γ20 were 400, (a)
2500 and 5000 μS/cm, corrected to the values at 20 °C, Figure 3. Average flashover voltages Uav vs. salt deposit density SDD at
respectively). various conductivities of applied water: (a) Type A.
432 X. Jiang et al.: Effect of Ultrasonic Fog on AC Flashover Voltage of Polluted Porcelain and Glass Insulators
50 2500uS/cm
with the increase of pollution layer conductivity on the
400uS/cm
insulator surface. Because the fog water deposited on the
insulator surface increases the pollution layer conductivity of
40
insulator surface. Based on Section 3.2, the relationships
between Uav and γ20 can also be expressed as:
30 U av B ( 20 ) b (4)
where B is a coefficient related to the shape, geometry and
20 material of insulator; b is an exponent related to the
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 2 0.20 conductivity of the applied water γ20.
Salt desposit density, SDD (mg/cm )
From Table 2, the relationships between Uav and γ20 at
(b) various SDDs are shown in Figure 4 for samples. Fitting the
60
data in Table 2 according to equation (4), allows the
coefficients B and the characteristic exponents b to be
5000uS/cm
obtained, as shown in Table 4.
Flashover voltage, Uav (kV)
40
30
30
20
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 20
2
Salt desposit density, SDD (mg/cm ) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
γ20 (µS/cm)
(c) (a)
60 0.05 mg/cm2
0.10 mg/cm2
Figure 3. Average flashover voltages Uav vs. salt deposit density SDD at 0.15 mg/cm2
various conductivities of applied water: (b) Type B; (c) Type C. 0.20 mg/cm2
50
Flashover voltage, Uav (kV)
55
Flashover voltage, Uav (kV)
coefficients (R2) of regression (3) are greater than 0.98. 0 1000 2000 3000
γ20 (µS/cm)
4000 5000