We are IntechOpen,

the world’s leading publisher of

Open Access books
Built by scientists, for scientists

6,900
Open access books available
186,000
International authors and editors
200M Downloads

Our authors are among the

154
Countries delivered to
TOP 1%
most cited scientists
12.2%
Contributors from top 500 universities

Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index

in Web of Science™ Core Collection (BKCI)

Interested in publishing with us?

Contact [email protected]
Numbers displayed above are based on latest data collected.
For more information visit www.intechopen.com
Chapter

Introductory Chapter: New

Challenges and Innovations in
Grape and Wine Production
António M. Jordão

1. Introduction

According to the Report of Global Market Trajectory & Analytics [1], in 2022, the
global market value for all wine styles (still, sparkling, and fortified) is expected to
reach US$326.6 billion and keep growing at annual rates above 4%. Thus, grape and
wine production is a very relevant agricultural activity and represents an important
economic sector in the international trade. For wine, after the year of 2020 where
there was a large trade disruption world over, the lifting of restrictions due to the
COVID-19 pandemic has set the world wine export market on its path to reconcili-
ation. According to the OIV statistics published in 2022, it was possible to obtain
in 2021 a value of 111.6 mhl for world wine exports. This was the largest exported
volume of wine ever recorded in history. At the same time, world wine exports in
2021 have increased by 4% compared with 2020 and have boosted even more in terms
of value with 34.3 billion EUR, registering a yearly increase of 16% [2]. This large
economic increase results from a global area of vineyards estimated at 7.3 mha in 2021.
This area compared with 2020 shows a very slow decrease of −0.3%. In addition, all
this world area under vines refers to the total surface area planted with vines for all
purposes (wine and juices, table grapes, and dried grapes), including young vines
that are not yet productive.
It is important to note that grape and wine sectors are not only relevant in eco-
nomic terms but also historically and culturally. In fact, since antiquity, grape is one
of the earliest domesticated fruit crops and has been widely cultivated and appreci-
ated for its fruit and wine. Moreover, there is evidence that grapevine cultivation
and winemaking dating back to at least 5800 BC [3]. According to Myles et al. [4],
grapevine cultivation emerged in the Near East before spreading to Europe and sub-
sequently for other parts of world. In recent years, this historical and cultural richness
has also been the object of a strong economic use, namely through wine tourism.
Therefore, despite the economic relevance and long historical past, the production
of grapes and wine faces a high number of challenges that lead to an increasing com-
mitment to innovation and sustainability of the entire production chain. Thus, there
are several challenges, such as a change in production methods through a reduction
in the use of crop protection products and an increase in biocontrol solutions and
biostimulants in the different practices of viticulture. On the other hand, the produc-
tion of wines using a proper identification of the coadjutants used and the reduction
in the use of several products with a negative impact on human health, namely the use

1
Recent Advances in Grapes and Wine Production - New Perspectives for Quality Improvement

of sulfur, are other challenges. However, one of the most important challenges of wine
industry is related with climate change, particularly through global warming and its
impacts on grapevines and their characteristics. In fact, global warming is respon-
sible for many of the problems facing winegrowers around the world. The impact
of climate change is currently responsible for several problems in all world regions,
such as early grape harvests that are becoming increasingly common. In this case,
grape harvesters must work in extremely hot weather conditions, resulting in more
frequent breaks and production losses and, at the same time, higher sugar content in
the grapes. This last consequence induces a production of wines with higher alcohol
levels and at the same relevant changes in the wines’ aromas. In addition, early bud
break (as early as March) is weakening the vine stock, exposing it to a greater risk of
frost until April or even May. Also, frequent droughts and reduced water availability
have led to an increase in vine plant destruction. Furthermore, there are also new
challenges related with human resource for winegrowers. Thus, in many regions, par-
ticularly in Europe, there is a reduction in the available labor force. Consequently, the
hiring of foreign workers is an increasing trend, especially for the works in viticulture
and during the grape harvest. The future at this level could involve the increasing
use of vine robots, thus reducing the necessary work force, but also allowing for an
increasing precision viticulture. The use of vineyard robots, which is still uncommon
practice around the world, offers several advantages. In that case, robots make tasks
less difficult, optimize working time (winegrowers can devote their time to activities
with more added value), and increase the profitability.
Finally, new challenges related with the sustainability and circular economy are
presented to the wine industry. If compared with other chains, the wine industry
is considered of low environmental impact [5]. According to OIV (International
Organization of Vine and Wine), sustainable vitiviniculture is defined as a “global
strategy on the scale of the grape production and processing systems, incorporating at the
same time the economic sustainability of structures and territories, producing quality
products, considering requirements of precision in sustainable viticulture, risks to the envi-
ronment, products safety and consumer health and valuing of heritage, historical, cultural,
ecological and landscape aspects.” Thus, from this definition, the sustainability of wine
sector includes diverse aspects of organic, biodynamic, and integrated production,
but at the same time also incorporates the history, the culture, the landscape, and all
intangible aspects that characterize the wine production and consumption. In addition,
the progress in grape and wine production also has a strong component in the circular
economy, where the use of waste and its recovery also present increasing challenges.
In a simple way, the circular economy is based on a general idea where waste coming
from an activity should be passed to another activity with an important valorization
on an infinite loop. Thus, from the vineyard and from the wine production process,
various residues can be valued, for example, pruning residues, stalks, pomace, and
lees. From these residues, several advances have emerged through the introduction of
various technologies, making it possible to develop and obtain various products, such
as pellets, biomass, alcohol, biogas, grape seed oil, tartaric acid, and several bioactive
compounds (resveratrol, tannins, etc.) used in food and pharmaceutical industries.

2. Innovations in grape and wine production

Without innovative developments over innumerable generations, wines as we

know them would not exist. Over the last few years, several innovations have been
2
Introductory Chapter: New Challenges and Innovations in Grape and Wine Production
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109156

introduced in the production of grapes and wines. In viticulture, the innovations

produced have included the introduction of new production techniques (including
different viticultural practices and a better use of water resources) with a view to
improving the profitability of grape production and dealing with climate change, the
use of new strategies to combat diseases and pests, the development of hybrid grape
varieties (including new varieties) well adapted to the new environmental condi-
tions, and also the introduction of new technologies linked to precision viticulture.
All these developments try to answer to four fundamental objectives: improvement in
the quality of the grapes, reduction in the production costs through mechanization,
protection of the environment, and response to climate change.
In terms of soil management, there are several works where a combination of
different techniques, such as chemical weeding, soil tillage, and cover-cropping
[6, 7], has been developed. In addition, it is well known that an adequate nitrogen
supply of the grapevines was proved to play a key role in plant fertilization, and at
the same time, nitrogen deficiency could impair the wine quality [8]. In addition,
high grape nitrogen deficiencies also affect fermentation kinetics and wine flavors
[9]. Thus, several innovative works ranging from plant biology to factors linked to N
regulation have been conducted to contribute to the implementation of sustainable
practices in the vineyards.
Currently, the management of available water is essential for the sustainability of
agricultural activity and consequently for the viticulture. Thus, several innovations
have been introduced in terms of rational water management in vineyards. These
innovations involve the use of drought-tolerant and drought-resistant rootstocks,
a correct canopy management, an adequate irrigation strategy, the use of different
sensors for better water management (e.g., the use of electromagnetic induction
sensors), and the introduction of remote sensor technologies [10]. In addition, several
studies reported that moderate water restriction in vineyards is also favorable for the
wine quality [11].
For vine training, a special interest was given to the winter pruning, keeping in
mind the respect for the sap flows and trying to limit the expansion of several dis-
eases, namely the wood diseases. Thresholds of leaf/fruit ratios were established and
the canopy management during the summer, such as leaf removal and shoot tipping,
was adapted accordingly. Related with vine diseases, in recent years there has been
a rapid development of strategies to combat these sanitary problems in vineyards
based on the use of biocontrol products. Thus, the practical combat has included the
use of natural products of mineral, plant, or microbial origin, the implementation of
strategies related with the antagonistic microorganisms, and the use of plant defense
inducers. All these strategies have contributed to reduce viticulture’s dependence
upon synthetic fungicides [12, 13].
Also related with the use of new plant material more resistant to disease and
drought, the use of hybrids in viticulture is currently being discussed. The introduc-
tion of this new grapevine plant material introduces new perspectives to reduce the
use of pesticides and increase the adaptation of vines to climate change [14].
In the winery, the recent developments of sensor technologies offer the possibil-
ity to control all the relevant parameters for a correct winemaking process and to
guarantee a high quality of wine produced. These new technologies help winemak-
ers to have a set of information in real time, not only during fermentation but also
during wine aging, which help them to make the best decisions throughout the wine
production process. Recently, new knowledge about the fermentation process has
led to the introduction of strong innovations in wine production processes. In the
3
Recent Advances in Grapes and Wine Production - New Perspectives for Quality Improvement

past, Saccharomyces spp. yeasts were almost the only option for used during alcoholic
fermentation. This was due to the high ability to metabolize all grape juice sugar into
ethanol. However, several results proved that also the use of non-Saccharomyces strains
can improve the wine quality. In this context, the use of these new strains of yeasts
contributes positively to improve the wine acidity, aromatic complexity, contribut-
ing at the same time for low levels of acetic acid and ethanol produced, among
other positive effects [15]. Thus, in the past years, the main manufactures started to
commercialize dry non-Saccharomyces strains in the market of oenological products
containing different yeast species (e.g., Torulaspora delbrueckii, Schizosaccharomyces
pombe, and Pichia kluyveri).
In recent years, due to greater control over alcohol consumption in some coun-
tries (related with health problems associated with the consumption of alcoholic
beverages), as well as due to new trends in wine consumption, several techniques
have been developed for the reduction of ethanol content in wines with excessive
alcohol content [16]. In addition, climate change has also contributed in some
warmer regions to the production of grapes with excessive amounts of potential
alcohol. Also related with the effects on health because of the consumption of
alcoholic beverages, several studies have been carried out for the production of wines
with reduced sulfur content (or even sulfur free), but at the same time maintaining
the wine quality. Thus, several alternative technologies have been developed and
compared, such as pulsed electric fields (PEF), high-pressure processing (HPP),
power ultrasound (US), ultraviolet irradiation (UV), high-pressure homogenization
(HPH), filtration, and low electric current (LEC). All these technologies have been
explored with the aim to obtain adequate microbial inactivation and at the same time
maintaining the wine quality [17].
To induce better performance to clarify and stabilize wines, new natural, non-
allergenic, and non-animal fining agents have been developed by the different
manufactures helping winemakers to obtain wines with high quality [18]. At the
same time, recent developments in filtration technologies have been introduced to
help winemakers to reduce the problems of precipitation of unstable proteins present
in white wines after bottling. This problem can cause cloudiness, which is generally
considered commercially unacceptable [19].
Finally, for wine aging, different technologies and winemaking practices have also
been developed. Several options have been made available, such as wine aging using
wood fragments, combination of micro-oxygenation with wood fragments, different
options in wine aging on lees, the improvement of wine aging in bottles, and mecha-
nisms in acceleration of wine aging using different technologies (physical methods
involving ultrasonic waves, gamma rays, electric fields, nanogold photocatalysis, and
high-pressure treatments) [20].
In conclusion, all these challenges contribute to the continuous innovation in the
production of grapes and wines and the consequent concern with their quality and at
the same time increase in the sustainability in all production chains. Together, con-
sumer and market demands are increasing, thus inducing the necessary investment in
constant innovation.

4
Introductory Chapter: New Challenges and Innovations in Grape and Wine Production
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109156

Author details

António M. Jordão1,2

1 Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Agrarian Higher School, Viseu, Portugal

2 Chemistry Research Centre of Vila Real (CQ-VR), Vila Real, Portugal

*Address all correspondence to: [email protected]

© 2022 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.
5
Recent Advances in Grapes and Wine Production - New Perspectives for Quality Improvement

References

[1] Research and Markets Wine - Agronomy. 2021;11:862. DOI: 10.3390/

Global Market Trajectory & Analytics agronomy11050862
[Internet]. 2022. Available from:
https://www.researchandmarkets.com/ [8] Verdenal T, Dienes-Nagy Á,
reports/338680/. [Accessed: November Spangenberg JE, Zufferey V, Spring
12, 2022] J-L, Viret O, et al. Understanding
and managing nitrogen nutrition
[2] State of the World Vine and Wine in grapevine: A review. OENO
Sector 2021 [Internet]. 2022. Available One. 2021;55:1-43. DOI: 10.20870/
from: https://www.oiv.int. [Accessed: oeno-one.2021.55.1.3866
September 25, 2022]
[9] Loulakakis KA, Morot-Gaudry JF,
[3] McGovern P, Jalabadze M, Batiuk S, Velanis CN, Skopelitis DS, Moschou PN,
Callahan MP, Smith KE, Hall GR, et al. Hirel B, et al. Advancements in nitrogen
Early Neolithic wine of Georgia in the metabolism in grapevine. In:
South Causcasus. Proceedings of the Roubelakis-Angelakis KA, editor.
National Academy of Sciences of USA. Grapevine Molecular Physiology &
2017;114:E10309-E10318. DOI: 10.1073/ Biotechnology. Dordrecht: Springer
pnas.1714728114 Netherlands Publisher; 2009. pp. 161-205

[4] Myles S, Boyko AR, Owens CL, [10] Mirás-Avalos JM, Araujo ES.
Brown PJ, Grassi F, Aradhya MK, et al. Optimization of vineyard water
Genetic structure and domestication management: Challenges, strategies, and
history of the grape. Proceedings of perspectives. Water. 2021;13:746.
the National Academy of Sciences of DOI: 10.3390/w13060746
USA. 2011;108:3530-3535. DOI: 10.1073/
pnas.1009363108 [11] Simonneau T, Lebon E, Coupel-
Ledru A, Marguerit E, Rossdeutsch L,
[5] Merli R, Preziosi M, Acampora A. Ollat N. Adapting plant material to
Sustainability experiences in the wine face water stress in vineyards: Which
sector: Toward the development of an physiological targets for an optimal
international indicators system. Journal control of plant water status? OENO
of Cleaner Production. 2018;172:3791- One. 2017;51:167-179. DOI: 10.20870/
3805. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.129 oeno-one.2017.51.2.1870

[6] Delpuech X, Metay A. Adapting [12] Wurms KV, Chee A, Elmer PAG,
cover crop soil coverage to soil depth Agnew RH, Wood PN. Developing new
to limit competition for water in a biologically-based products for control
Mediterranean vineyard. European of botrytis bunch rot. Part 1: Developing
Journal of Agronomy. 2018;97:60-69. a new natural product for mid-season
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.04.013 botrytis control - NP2 moves closer to the
market. Wine and Viticulture Journal.
[7] Crézé CM, Horwath WR. Cover 2011;26:64-72
cropping: A malleable solution for
sustainable agriculture ? Meta- [13] Rantsiou K, Giacosa S, Pugliese M,
analysis of ecosystem service Englezos V, Ferrocino I, Río Segade S,
frameworks in perennial systems. et al. Impact of chemical and alternative
6
Introductory Chapter: New Challenges and Innovations in Grape and Wine Production
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109156

fungicides applied to grapevine cv

Nebbiolo on microbial ecology and
chemical-physical grape characteristics
at harvest. Frontiers in Plant
Science. 2020;11:700. DOI: 10.3389/
fpls.2020.00700

[14] De la Fuente LM. Use of hybrids

in viticulture. A challenge for the OIV.
OENO One. 2018;52:231-234.
DOI: 10.20870/oeno-one.2018.52.3.2312

[15] Maicas S. Advances in wine

fermentation. Fermentation. 2021;7:187.
DOI: 10.3390/fermentation7030187

[16] Bucher T, Deroover K, Stockley C.

Production, and marketing of low-
alcohol wine. In: Morata A, Loira I,
editors. Advances in Grape and Wine
Biotechnology. London, UK: IntechOpen;
2019. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.87025

[17] Silva FVM, Van Wyk S. Emerging

non-thermal technologies as alternative
to SO2 for the production of wine.
Food. 2021;10:2175. DOI: 10.3390/
foods10092175

[18] Marangon M, Vincenzi S,

Curioni A. Wine fining with plant
proteins. Molecules. 2019;24:2186.
DOI: 10.3390/molecules24112186

[19] Sui Y, McRae J, Wollan D,

Muhlack R, Godden P, Wilkinson K.
Use of ultrafiltration and proteolytic
enzymes as alternative approaches for
protein stabilisation of white wine.
Australian Journal of Grape and Wine
Research. 2021;27:234-245. DOI: 10.1111/
ajgw.12475

[20] Tao Y, García JF, Sun D-W. Advances

in wine aging technologies for enhancing
wine quality and accelerating wine aging
process. Critical Reviews in Food Science
and Nutrition. 2014;54:817-835.
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2011.609949
7