DG Concept
DG Concept
Overview of
Data Governance Framework and Program
! Data Management
! Enterprise Information Management
! Data Architecture
Data,
Information
and
Content
Lifecycles
! Ensuring that data quality standards and rules are defined and
integrated into development and day-to-day operations.
! Ensuring that on-going evaluation of data quality occurs.
! Ensuring that organization issues related to changed processes and
priorities are addressed.
Taxonomy of Policy
Principle Standards
Policy Controls
Processes
Content as Asset Data and content of all types are assets with all the characteristics of any other asset.
Therefore, they should be managed, secured, and accounted for as other material and
financial assets.
Real Value There is value in all data and content, based on their contribution to UDOT’s business/
operational objectives, their intrinsic marketability, and/or their contribution to UDOT’s overall
image in the State of Utah.
Going Concern Data and content are not viewed as temporary means to achieve results (or merely as a
business by-product), but are critical to successful, ongoing business operations and
management.
Risk There is risk associated with data and content. This risk must be formally recognized, either
as a liability or through incurring costs to manage and reduce the inherent risk.
Due Diligence If a risk is known, it must be reported. If a risk is possible, it must be confirmed.
Quality The relevance, meaning, accuracy, and life cycle of data and content can affect the financial
status and citizen perception of UDOT.
Audit The accuracy of data and content is subject to periodic audit by an independent body.
Accountability UDOT must identify parties which are ultimately responsible for data and content assets
Liability The risks in information means there is a financial and public image related liability inherent
in all data or content that is based on regulatory and ethical misuse or mismanagement.
! EIM, DG, MDM and all the concepts discussed exist to manifest IAM!
Info Info Info Info Info Info Info Info Info Info
Subject Subject Subject Subject Subject Subject Subject Subject Subject Subject
Scope factors that affect the federated layers and activities are:
! Size of Enterprise
! Brands
! Countries – (PS = Departments, Agencies)
! IT Portfolio Condition
! Culture and Information Maturity
DG Accountability;
Ownership Issue
Resolution
DG Responsibility;
Stewardship
Monitoring
Data,
Information
and
Content
Lifecycles
Master Principle We will manage all Enterprise Data and Content as a corporate asset.
Federation We will specify enterprise standards for all content and data structures.
Information Efficiency Relevant data, information, and content needs to be available at the right time, at the right
place, and in the right format to authorized users/consumers, at an efficient cost.
Business Alignment Information management applications and technology will be acquired in response to
business needs verified through a formal annual process.
Information Quality All enterprise data/information will be managed and measured for quality. Quality will be
consistently measured to ensure the data can be utilized for its intended purpose.
Risk Management Appropriate due diligence will be conducted to comply with all relevant statutory and federal
laws, policies, and regulations.
Collaborate Enterprise data will be a shared resource across UDOT. Data is not a resource which can be
“owned” by specific business areas.
! Objectives
! Vision
! Program Risks
! Business Alignment
! Costs of Data Quality
! Costs of Missed Opportunities
! Obstacles, Impacts, and Changes
! Presentation of the Case
Direct Benefits
! Improvements in efficiency
! Increase in revenue, citizen value
! Reduction in risk
– Privacy
– Data Security
– Civil Liability
– Incorrect Decisions
– Regulatory
Indirect Benefits
! Support activities that ensure good data and information is available to
accomplish business goals
! Support business programs that work towards increasing revenue, lowering
costs, and reducing risk
! Cultural Risk – UDOT fails to engage in the DG process and continues poor
data asset management practices.
! Actual business benefits of DG at UDOT will come from major initiatives in the
regions and divisions. Be sure to find these “hot topics” and use DG to add
value.
! UDOT’s business case must mention the current costs and risks associated
with data quality.
! It is fair to cover possible cultural and any other organizational challenges that
exist at UDOT.
! Any obstacles?