Recent Research Developments of 4D Printing Technology For Magnetically Controlled Smart Materials
Recent Research Developments of 4D Printing Technology For Magnetically Controlled Smart Materials
Review
Recent Research Developments of 4D Printing Technology for
Magnetically Controlled Smart Materials: A Review
Hujun Wang 1 , Jinqiu Zhao 1 , Zhuo Luo 1 and Zhenkun Li 2, *
1 School of Applied Technology, China University of Labor Relations, Beijing 100048, China
2 School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
* Correspondence: [email protected]
Abstract: Traditional printed products have to some extent affected the development of smart
structures and their application in multiple fields, especially in harsh environments, due to their
complex mechanisms and control principles. The 4D printing technology based on magnetically
controlled smart materials exploits the advantages of magnetically controlled smart materials with
good operability and security, and its printed smart structures can be obtained under magnetic field
drive for unfettered remote manipulation and wireless motion control, which expands the application
of printed products in complex environments, such as sealed and narrow, and has broad development
prospects. At present, magnetically controlled smart material 4D printing technology is still in its
infancy, and its theory and application need further in–depth study. To this end, this paper introduces
the current status of research on magnetically controlled smart material 4D printing, discusses the
printing process, and provides an outlook on its application prospects.
Keywords: 4D printing; magnetically controlled smart material; printing process; magnetic drive
2. Research Status
2.1. Magnetically Controlled Materials
In the 4D printing process, two aspects are required of the material: printability and
intelligence. Printability is a prerequisite for 4D structures to be realized in the process [19].
In the printing process of extrusion, rheology modifiers can be used to provide the proper
material viscosity. Photoinitiators, crosslinkers, and sacrificial agents are also important
factors to consider for printability. Smart materials for 4D printing can be classified into
shape change materials (SCM) and shape memory materials (SMM). Magnetically con-
trolled 4D printed smart materials can undergo a deformation response under the action of
alternating the magnetic field, rotating the magnetic field, and oscillating the magnetic field
and gradient magnetic field. Magnetically controlled smart materials are characterized by
a large deformation rate, easy control, fast dynamic response, high power density, high
electromechanical energy conversion efficiency, and the ability to realize contactless control.
With the development of magnetically controlled 4D printing technology, the research and
development of magnetically controlled smart materials that can be used for this technology
is also in progress, and the variety is increasing.
Currently, magnetically smart materials can be divided into magnetothermally de-
formable shape memory polymers (SMP) and composite elastomers driven by magnetic par-
ticles encapsulated within a matrix material according to indirect and direct responses [20].
The direct response method fixes a substrate mixed with magnetic particles into a tem-
porary shape and places it in a magnetic field. The magnetic field changes the magnetic
domains in the magnetic particles, and when the same magnetic field is applied again,
the magnetic field of the magnetic particles in the substrate responds to the applied mag-
netic field, thus achieving shape memory. The indirect response method is based on the
magneto–thermal interaction of the magnetic particles in the magnetic field and uses a
thermally driven method to achieve shape memory, which is a variation of the thermally
driven method. According to the composition, they can be divided into two categories:
magnetic shape memory composite hydrogels and magnetic shape memory polymers and
their composites [21].
For example, the scales of blood vessels and tissue interstitials within the human body often
span several orders of magnitude, and it is impossible to match such complex environments
, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW with only certain fixed–scale micro–robots; compatible motion control of micro–robots
5 of 28 at
different scales has also been a challenge due to the fact that the forces that dominate the
motion behavior of micro–robots at different scales vary with the scale.
Figure
Figure 2. (a–d) Controlled 2. (a–d)deformation,
motion, Controlled motion,anddeformation,
scale scalingandofscale scaling
a scale of a scale reconfigurable
reconfigurable magnetic magnetic
droplet robot in a live dramatic environment (simulation). (e) Schematic
droplet robot in a live dramatic environment (simulation). (e) Schematic representation of magnetic representation of magnetic
nanoparticles
nanoparticles in the water phaseinand the water phasein
ligands andthe
ligands
oil in the oilself–assembling
phase phase self–assemblingat atthe
the water–oil
water–oil interface
to form dense two–dimensional nanofilms and ferromagnetic droplets. (f) Transmission electron
interface to form dense two–dimensional nanofilms and ferromagnetic droplets. (f) Transmission
micrograph of magnetic nanoparticles undergoing blocking phase transition at the water–oil interface.
electron micrograph of magnetic nanoparticles undergoing blocking phase transition at the water–
(g) A ferromagnetic droplet suspended in the oil phase rotates under the action of an external
oil interface. (g) A ferromagnetic droplet suspended in the oil phase rotates under the action of an
magnetic field, and the turbulent trajectory of the liquid around the droplet is recorded with the red
external magnetic field, and the turbulent trajectory of the liquid around the droplet is recorded
dye. (h) Schematic representation of the magnetic nanoparticles in the aqueous phase and the ligands
with the red dye. (h) Schematic representation
in the oil phase self–assembling ofatthe
the magnetic nanoparticles
water–oil interface in the
to form dense aqueous phase
two–dimensional nanofilms
and the ligands in theandoilferromagnetic
phase self–assembling at the water–oil interface to form
droplets (adapted from with the permission from Ref. [23], 2022, dense two–
Science Advance.
dimensional nanofilmsRef. and[24],ferromagnetic
2019, Science). droplets (adapted from with the permission from Ref.
[23], 2022, Science Advance. Ref. [24], 2019, Science).
In order to expand the application of ferromagnetic droplets, further research on
their principles is needed. Research on soft robots has been very hot in the past few
2.1.2. Magnetic Shape Memory Composite Hydrogel
years, but their power systems still face a big challenge: small soft robots yet require
Magnetic hydrogels are compounded
huge pneumatic equipment.by magnetic
If this magneticparticles
droplet isand a hydrogel
embedded matrix,
in a soft robot, it can
move with only a magnetic field, thus greatly simplifying its
which not only have excellent porosity and no killing effect on fibroblasts, but also havepower system. Liu et al. [24]
have demonstrated the conversion of ferromagnetic fluids into ferromagnetic droplets
good mechanical stability and special magnetic responsiveness. The development around
by interfacial interference and magnetization of MNP surfactants. The self–assembly of
magnetic hydrogelsmagnetic
has been very rapidatintherecent
nanoparticles years,
water–oil and can
interface theybeshow good
controlled to prospects
eventually guide
for applications in drug release, photonic
the conversion crystals,
of ferromagnetic actuators,
fluids and artificial
from paramagnetic muscles. Shape–
to ferromagnetic. Hysteresis
loops ofare
memory hydrogels (SMH) irona 3O4–carbon monoxide
class of special 2H ferromagnetic
shape–memory fluid droplets
polymers (Figure
containing 2e) show
large
the same ferromagnetic fluid droplets with and without magnetic nanoparticle (MNP)
amounts of water consisting of a permanent cross–linked network and a molecular switch
surfactants jamming the interfacial assembly. When the magnetic field is removed, the
whose initial shapemoment
is determined by the permanent
of the ferromagnetic droplet remains cross–linked
constant untilnetwork,
the dropletand the to a
is exposed
temporary shape is magnetic
fixed byfield
the that
molecular
exceeds switch [25]. field,
the switching It hasand
been
then,shown that ismagnetic
the droplet re–magnetized.
nanoparticles in hydrogels and their precursors (inks) have an effect on their rheological
and mechanical stability, and magnetic nanoparticles can react with the polymer
backbone, thus changing its physical and chemical properties and also making the bio–
nanocomposites magnetic.
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 5 of 27
Reshaping the droplet with other external fields or reducing the binding energy of the
MNP surfactant also causes the MNP surfactant (Mr and Hc) to disappear, providing a
further way to control magnetization. This ability to manipulate magnetization further
distinguishes ferromagnetic droplets from ferromagnetic fluids and common ferromagnetic
materials. Combined with the latest all–liquid–phase 3D printing and microfluidic molding
techniques, researchers can fabricate magnetic liquid devices with arbitrary morphologies
under all–liquid conditions. Figure 2g shows the visualization of hydrodynamic vortices
in FLD collections using oil–soluble dyes in a rotating magnetic field. The bar magnet
attracts ferromagnetic droplets, and using a rotating magnet, the ferromagnetic droplets are
attracted to the center of the magnet and form a dynamically stable pattern that balances
hydrodynamic repulsion and magnetic attraction. Furthermore, the self–assembly of
interfacial magnetic nanoparticles is reversible and can be reconfigured by changing the
aqueous phase acid–base environment (Figure 2h) where an increase in pH from 4.5 to
9 loosens the MNP surfactant, and the droplet shape returns to a spherical shape. The
magnetization strength is lost, but by decreasing the pH, the MNP surfactant is re–clogged,
and the droplet changes back to a ferromagnetic droplet. Thus, the shape and magnetic
state of the ferromagnetic droplet are responsive. It changes the physical experience
that ferromagnetic substances can only be composed of hard materials by studying their
properties, and it has a wide range of potential applications from an application point
of view.
The new ferromagnetic droplets have many peculiar properties and are expected
to be used in the future for magnetically controlled liquid robots, programmable liquid
microreactors, and driving new liquid magnetic material characterization techniques, such
as polarized neutron magnetic field imaging, forward, and researchers will continue to
investigate more complex 3D printed magnetic liquid structures, such as artificial cells
printed with liquid, small propeller–motioned micro–robots, and deliveries to diseased
cells as a targeted non–invasive drug delivery.
layers of 0% MNPs, thirteen layers of 10% MNPs and fourteen layers of 20% MNPs); PG0, hydrogel
assembled from 3 inks, measuring the bending angle for the cantilever where the magnet was on
the side of the layers with 0% MNPs; PG20, hydrogel assembled from 3 inks, measuring the bending
angle for the cantilever where the magnet was on the side of the layers with 20% MNPs (adapted
from with the permission from Ref. [29], 2021, Additive Manufacturing).
Figure 4. FDM printing magneto–thermal effect driven deformation structure (adapted from with
Figure 4. FDM printing magneto–thermal effect driven deformation structure (adapted from with
the
thepermission
permissionfrom
fromRef.
Ref.[31],
[31],2019,
2019,Composites:
Composites:PartA).
PartA).
2.1.4. Magnetic Particle–Driven Composite Elastomers
2.1.4. Magnetic Particle–Driven Composite Elastomers
A composite elastomer driven by magnetic particles encased in a matrix material
A composite
is usually a polymerelastomer driven
grid using by magnetic
magnetic particles
nanoparticles encased
(MNP) in a matrix
physically material is
or chemically.
usually a polymer
Compared grid using magnetic
to magnetothermally nanoparticles
deformable (MNP)
SMP, the use physically
of magnetic or chemically.
nanoparticles to
Compared to magnetothermally deformable SMP, the use of magnetic nanoparticles to
directly drive the elastic matrix for reversible deformation results in fast response, large
deformation, and rapid deformation.
The research group of Prof. Yusheng Shi at Huazhong University of Science and
Technology adopted the idea of material compounding [32] to combine additively
fabricated magnetoelectric materials, thus realizing a new type of flexible magnetoelectric
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 8 of 27
directly drive the elastic matrix for reversible deformation results in fast response, large
deformation, and rapid deformation.
The research group of Prof. Yusheng Shi at Huazhong University of Science and
Technology adopted the idea of material compounding [32] to combine additively fabricated
magnetoelectric materials, thus realizing a new type of flexible magnetoelectric device. The
flexible magnetoelectric device consists of a highly homogeneous porous structure that
generates a magnetic field due to its permanent magnetism and a conductive spiral structure
(equivalent to a conductive coil) in this magnetic field. It consists of a highly identical
porous structure with a helical structure. It can be compressed or recovered periodically
under the influence of external pressure, during which the magnetic flux through the coil
changes, and it is known from Faraday’s principle of electromagnetic induction that a
voltage will appear between two parallel plates. Therefore, additive manufacturing of
magnetic composites, i.e., 4D printing of magnetic smart materials, produces components
with piezoelectric properties and the ability to sense external pressure. The properties and
functions above are not present in the original magnetic porous and conductive structures.
This work has enriched the 4D printing research ideas.
complex three–dimensional figure under the action of a magnetic field and took on different
morphologies with the direction and intensity of the applied magnetic field.
Based on Kim’s research, the researchers have developed a variety of composite
inks for 4D printing, whose structures are enhanced in different directions by an external
magnetic field, depending on their application requirements. Zhu et al. [47] mixed iron
nanoparticles with PDMS to make a printable composite ink, the printed structure changed
shape under the action of an alternating magnetic field, and the response time is shortened
by this external magnetic field. Due to the low magnetic force and high magnetic permit-
tivity of the soft magnetic iron particles in this composite ink, the printed structures can
gain or lose high magnetization immediately when the external magnetic field is switched
on or off. As an example of a 3D butterfly with rapidly flapping wings under an applied
magnetic field, as shown in Figure 5b, the butterfly structure printed with PDMS/Fe ink
deformed under magnetic stimulation and the butterfly wings flapped from the lowest
to the highest position in only 0.7 s; Podstawczyk [48] formulated a bio–nanocomplex
synthesized from alginate, methylcellulose, and magnetic nanoparticles as a novel 4D
printing ink to print predefined 3D structures that can retain their shape for a long time
after printing and have high mechanical stability. The thixotropic inks developed in this
study are expected to be ideal for direct printing of high–fidelity, magnetically–activated,
stimulus–responsive hydrogel structures, whereas conventional DIW printing techniques
can only achieve programmable magnetic orientation and constant magnetic density. Wu
et al. [49] introduced a method for DIW printing using voxel–encoded hard magnetic soft
active materials (hmSAMs) and combined it with an evolutionary algorithm (EA)–based
design strategy to achieve the desired magnetic drive as well as complex geometry and
curvature distribution. Magnetization density and magnetization direction distribution
can be programmed simultaneously during hmSAMs. Using the novel voxel–encoded
DIW printing technique, hmSAM functions with the required curvature distribution were
obtained, such as the bionic motion function of a rattlesnake performing a side–to–side
motion. In this printing method, each voxel includes multiple hmSAM layers with high
aspect ratio DIW printing, as shown in the actual DIW printed voxel elements in 5c. By
controlling the printing direction of each voxel, the overall magnetization intensity can
be achieved. Greater adjustability of magnetic flux density and magnetic field direction
distribution in DIW printing is achieved by increasing the number of layers of DIW voxels.
This printing method greatly broadens the application potential of hmSAMs.
Figure 5. (a) Direct ink printing process, (b) Magnetoparticle–filled magnetotactic SMPCs printed on
Figure 5. (a) Direct ink printing process, (b) Magnetoparticle–filled magnetotactic SMPCs printed
butterflies. (c) hmSAM voxel–coded DIW print (adapted from with the permission from Ref. [46],
on butterflies. (c) hmSAM voxel–coded DIW print (adapted from with the permission from Ref. [46],
2018, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Ref. [47], 2018, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
2018, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Ref. [47], 2018, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
Ref. [49], Intelligent
Ref. [49], 2020, Advanced 2020, Advanced Intelligent Systems).
Systems).
Deng [53] developed a laser rewritable magnetic composite film whose deformation
in response to a magnetic field can be digitally programmed with simple direct laser
writing and with transient laser heating to temporarily melt the phase change polymer so
that the orientation of the magnetic particles can be rearranged when the programmed
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 13 of 27
magnetic field changes. The NdFeB@PCL MPs were randomly oriented on the prepared
MRSM film using NdFeB@PCL MPs so that they were not fully magnetized. On the
melting of the polycaprolactone
Deng [53] developed (PCL) shell
a laser due to
rewritable local composite
magnetic laser heating,
film whose thedeformation
magneticin
orientation of the magnetic
response particlesfield
to a magnetic wascan re–adjusted to the programmable
be digitally programmed magnetic
with simple direct field
laser writing
and with transient laser heating to temporarily melt
orientation (e.g., Figure 6a). PCL was chosen because its melting temperature is much the phase change polymer so that the
orientation of the magnetic particles can be rearranged when the programmed magnetic
lower than that of silicone, allowing for the effective control of the laser power and
field changes. The NdFeB@PCL MPs were randomly oriented on the prepared MRSM
minimizing its damage.
film usingWhen the laser
NdFeB@PCL MPsissomoved
that they out
wereof the
not exposure zone, the
fully magnetized. On thePCL curesof
melting
quickly, and the theprogrammed
polycaprolactonemagnetic
(PCL) shellfielddue todirection
local laser of the NdFeB
heating, the magneticMPsorientation
is fixed.of
Depending on the themagnetic
digitally controlled
particles laser to
was re–adjusted scan and dynamically
the programmable magnetic changing the
field orientation
(e.g., Figure 6a). PCL was chosen because its
programmed magnetic field direction, magnetic domains with complex magnetic fieldmelting temperature is much lower than
that of silicone, allowing for the effective control of the laser power and minimizing its
anisotropy can damage.
be formed on the MRSM film. Because the phase transition of PCL is
When the laser is moved out of the exposure zone, the PCL cures quickly, and
reversible, the magnetic
the programmedfield magnetic
that wasfield rewritten
direction according
of the NdFeBto MPstheis fixed.
same Depending
program on hasthe
anisotropy anddigitally
can becontrolled
constructedlaser scaninandthedynamically
same MRSM changing film with different
the programmed shape
magnetic field
transformations.direction,
Using magnetic
this printingdomains method,
with complex magnetic fieldelectronic
polymorphic anisotropy can be formed
switches foron
the MRSM film. Because the phase transition of PCL is reversible, the magnetic field that
electronic devices can be fabricated, and reconfigurable magnetic soft robots with motion
was rewritten according to the same program has anisotropy and can be constructed in
modes, such as creeping,
the same MRSM crawling,
film withanddifferent
moving, cantransformations.
shape be constructed, Usingwhich is promising
this printing method,
in the field of adaptive
polymorphic and reconfigurable
electronic switches forsoft robots.
electronic Wucan
devices et be
al.fabricated,
[54] developed a new
and reconfigurable
magnetic soft4D
gripper using SLS–based robots with motion
printing modes, such
technology, as creeping,
discussed thecrawling,
2D/3D and moving, canofbe
distribution
constructed, which is promising in the field of adaptive
magnetic induction intensity and scalar magnetic potential of the gripper, conducted and reconfigurable soft robots.an Wu
et al. [54] developed a new gripper using SLS–based 4D printing technology, discussed
in–depth analysis of its deformation mechanism by adjusting its magnetic composition
the 2D/3D distribution of magnetic induction intensity and scalar magnetic potential of
and distance from the external
the gripper, conductedmagnet,
an in–depth and established
analysis a quantitative
of its deformation mechanismrelationship
by adjusting its
between the magnetic
magnetic excitation
composition and
andthe gripper,
distance which
from the provides
external magnet, guidance
and establishedfor afuture 4D
quantitative
printing controlled deformation, and driving force calculation research providesfor
relationship between the magnetic excitation and the gripper, which provides guidance
future 4D printing controlled deformation, and driving force calculation research provides
guidance, as shown in Figure 6b. Future research is required to optimize the structure of
guidance, as shown in Figure 6b. Future research is required to optimize the structure of
the gripper for more effective
the gripper controls.
for more effectiveThe energy
controls. Theconsumption
energy consumption in theindriving
the driving process
process
should also be considered.
should also be considered.
Figure 6. (a) System design and mechanism for DLW reprogramming MRSM thin film magnetic
anisotropy. (b) Gripper. (c) Printing water in oil using nanoparticle super soap (adapted from with
the permission from Ref. [53], 2020, Nature Communications. Ref. [54], 2020, ACS Applied Materials
& Interfaces. Ref. [55], 2018, Advanced Materials).
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 14 of 27
Figure 7. (a) Traditional light and ink–based 3D printing methods. (b) Magnetic multi–material DIW
Figure 7. (a) Traditional light and ink–based 3D printing methods. (b) Magnetic multi–material DIW
(M3 DIW)system
(M3 DIW) systemand
anditsitsworking
workingmechanism.
mechanism.(c)(c) CVP
CVP system
system schematic
schematic (adapted
(adapted from
from with
with the
the
permission from Ref. [56], 2020, Applied Materials Today. Ref. [65], 2021, ACS Applied Materials &
Interfaces. Ref. [66], 2022, Advanced Materials).
Figure8. 8.
Figure Schematic
Schematic diagram
diagram of theofworking
the working mechanism
mechanism and function
and function of magnetodynamic
of magnetodynamic polymers
polymers (MDPs). (a) Schematic diagram of MDP assembly. (b) Reversible elasto–plastic
(MDPs). (a) Schematic diagram of MDP assembly. (b) Reversible elasto–plastic transformation
transformation
scheme. scheme.
(c) Schematic (c) Schematic
diagram of MDPdiagram
modularofwelding
MDP modular welding
(d) Schematic (d) Schematic
diagram diagram of
of magnetization
magnetization reprogramming. (e) Schematic diagram of MDP structural reconfiguration (adapted
reprogramming. (e) Schematic diagram of MDP structural reconfiguration (adapted from with the
from with the permission from Ref. [71], 2020, Advanced Materials).
permission from Ref. [71], 2020, Advanced Materials).
Kuang et al. [71] used a combination of both bending and bending–folding into a
closed shape at a magnetic field of 100mT (as in Figure 9) and verified the validity of the
structure and response of the finite element method under magnetic force by comparing
numerical simulations with experimental data; at a heating temperature of 110°C and a
magnetic field of 35mT, it was verified that the magnetization strength of the 45° oriented
reprogrammed MDP film was sufficient to achieve magnetization. In addition, the
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 17 of 27
Kuang et al. [71] used a combination of both bending and bending–folding into a closed
shape at a magnetic field of 100 mT (as in Figure 9) and verified the validity of the structure
and response of the finite element method under magnetic force by comparing numerical
simulations with experimental data; at a heating temperature of 110 ◦ C and a magnetic field
of 35 mT, it was verified that the magnetization strength of the 45◦ oriented reprogrammed
MDP film was sufficient to achieve magnetization. In addition, the reprogramming intensity
of the remanent magnetization can reach 100% when the applied magnetic field reaches
140 mT. Using the synergistic effect of temperature and magnetic field to adjust the DP
network and magnetic dipole rearrangement, the functional features and applications of
MDP are demonstrated, which include seamless welding of modular components based
on objective functions, magnetization reprogramming for reconfigurable drive methods,
and structural reorganization for remote control. Magnetic modular components are based
on a combination of magnetized reprogramming and permanent shaping functions for
programmable and reconfigurable architectures and deformed structures. The investigated
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW
MDPs 18 of 28
will provide new directions for the design and fabrication of future multifunctional
components and reconfigurable deformable architectures and devices.
Figure Magnetically
Figure9. 9. assisted
Magnetically seamless
assisted welding
seamless modular
welding assembly.
modular (a) Elongated
assembly. assemblyassembly
(a) Elongated consist-
ing of three of
consisting MDP modules.
three (b) Tensile
MDP modules. (b)stress–strain curves for curves
Tensile stress–strain originalfor
and weldedand
original MDP specimens.
welded MDP
specimens.
(c) (c) Effect
Effect of process of process
conditions conditions
on the on the welding
welding efficiency efficiency
of processed MDPs. of(d)
processed MDPs.
Schematic (d)
diagram
Schematic
of diagram of and
square unidirectional square unidirectional
bidirectional and bidirectional
magnetization modules. magnetization modules. (e–h)
(e–h) Complex deformation of
Complex deformation of two–dimensional planar structures (adapted from with the permission
two–dimensional planar structures (adapted from with the permission from Ref. [71], 2020, Advanced
from Ref. [71], 2020, Advanced Materials).
Materials).
Softmagnetic
Soft magneticmaterials
materialsshow
show promise
promise in in a variety
a variety of applications
of applications because
because of their
of their fast
fast response,
response, remoteremote driveability,
driveability, and penetration
and wide wide penetration
range.range.
Song etSong et al.
al. [72] [72] prepared
prepared a new
a new
soft soft magnetic
magnetic composite
composite and proposed
and proposed a new aprinting
new printing
method method that reprograms
that reprograms the
the mag-
magnetization without affecting the intrinsic magnetic properties of the
netization without affecting the intrinsic magnetic properties of the embedded magnetic embedded
magneticand
particles particles and theproperties
the molecular molecularof properties
the matrix. of
Thethe matrix. The reprogrammable
reprogrammable magnetic com-
magnetic composites consist of spatially separated magnetic microspheres embedded in
an elastic matrix, each of which consists of magnetizable NdFeB particles with an average
particle size of 5 µm (e.g., Figure 10). The solid–liquid phase transformation allows the
magnetic particles within the microspheres to be rearranged, thus changing their
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 18 of 27
Figure 10. Design and mechanism of a reconfigurable magnetic composite. (a) Composition of
Figure 10. Design and mechanism of a reconfigurable magnetic composite. (a) Composition of a
a reconfigurable magnetic composite. (b) Rotatable and static ferromagnetic state of magnetic
reconfigurable magnetic composite. (b) Rotatable and static ferromagnetic state of magnetic
microspheres. (c) Process for reconfiguring a programmable magnetic composite (adapted from with
microspheres. (c) Process for reconfiguring a programmable magnetic composite (adapted from
the permission
with from Ref.
the permission from[72],
Ref.2020,
[72], Advanced Materials,
2020, Advanced Nano Nano
Materials, letters).
letters).
4. The Application of 4D Printing for Magnetically Controlled Smart Materials
4. The Application of 4D Printing for Magnetically Controlled Smart Materials
Nowadays, 4D printing has played an irreplaceable role in many fields. Printing
Nowadays,
time can be greatly4Dsaved
printing has played
through an irreplaceable
the evolution role inand
of the shape many fields. Printing
function time
of the smart
can be greatly saved through the evolution of the shape and function
materials and structures in manufacturing smart devices. It is confirmed that self–foldingof the smart
materials
can and structures
accelerate in manufacturing
rapid prototyping smartby
of 3D objects devices.
savingIt60–87%
is confirmed that self–folding
of printing time and
can accelerate rapid prototyping of 3D objects by saving 60–87% of
material consumption. In addition, the storage space can be saved by taking advantageprinting time and
material consumption. In addition, the storage space can be saved by taking
of stimulus–responsive shape change features. The application space for 4D printing is advantage of
stimulus–responsive
increasing. shape change
With the development features.
of 4D The
printing application
technology andspace for 4D printing
magnetically controlledis
increasing. With the development of 4D printing technology and magnetically
smart materials, the new magnetically controlled smart materials have been widely controlled
used in
smart materials, the new magnetically controlled
many fields and show good application prospects. smart materials have been widely used
in many fields and show good application prospects.
4.1. Biomedical Applications
4.1. Biomedical
Due to theApplications
need for the development of personalized implantable devices and drug
delivery
Duedevices, magnetically
to the need controlled 4D
for the development ofprinted SMP structures
personalized with
implantable biocompatible,
devices and drug
programmable, and reversible properties are now proven for potential applications
delivery devices, magnetically controlled 4D printed SMP structures with biocompatible, in many
targeted drug delivery
programmable, in the biomedical
and reversible field,
properties arewhere
now they offerfor
proven minimally
potentialinvasive, locally
applications in
effective, and controlled
many targeted therapeutic
drug delivery approaches
in the biomedical [73–76].
field, whereThe biodegradability,
they offer minimallylow inva-
invasive,
locally effective, and controlled therapeutic approaches [73–76]. The biodegradability, low
invasiveness and remote intervention, and non–contact control of 4D printed
bioimplantable devices with magnetically controlled smart materials offer significant
advantages in clinical operations. Traditional drug delivery can have undesirable
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 19 of 27
Figure 11.
Figure 11. Biomedical
Biomedical applications.
applications. (a) Blocker intervention
(a) Blocker intervention ASD
ASD schematic.
schematic. (b) Blocker frame
(b) Blocker frame
structure. (c) Blocker structure. (d) Blocker deployment process in the body. (e) Blocker covered
structure. (c) Blocker structure. (d) Blocker deployment process in the body. (e) Blocker covered byby
new tissue (adapted from with the permission from Ref. [77], 2019, Advanced Functional Materials).
new tissue (adapted from with the permission from Ref. [77], 2019, Advanced Functional Materials).
From aa tissue
From tissue process
process perspective,
perspective, manipulation
manipulation of of the
the orientation
orientation and and intensity
intensity ofof
the magnetic field will lead to specific changes in the morphology and
the magnetic field will lead to specific changes in the morphology and any shape of the any shape of the
scaffold, which
scaffold, which can
can be
be used
used for
for certain
certain tissues
tissues that
that require
require structural
structural regeneration
regeneration [78–80],
[78–80],
mechanical stimulation [81], and dry cell differentiation [82].
mechanical stimulation [81], and dry cell differentiation [82]. Tracheal stents Tracheal stents designed
designed
based on
based on biological
biological SMPs
SMPs materials
materials have
have excellent
excellent performance
performance of of being
being actuated
actuated without
without
contact, showing
contact, showing great
great potential
potential to to replace
replace conventional
conventional tracheal
tracheal stents.
stents. Zhao
Zhao et al. [83]
et al. [83]
designed a a4D4D
designed printed
printed tracheal
tracheal scaffold
scaffold with the with thetoability
ability adapt tototheadapt
complexto the complex
environment
environment
in in soft
the patient’s the tissue
patient’s softon
based tissue based on the microstructure
the microstructure of a glass sponge, of a which
glass sponge,
can be
which can be implanted in a programmed form and controlled
implanted in a programmed form and controlled by alternating magnetic fields to by alternating magnetic
change
fields
its to change its
morphology. Themorphology.
shape memory The properties
shape memory properties of
of bio–inspired 4D bio–inspired 4D printed
printed scaffolds help
scaffolds
to helpgeometry
match the to match of thethe
geometry
trachea of
and theallow
trachea
it toand allowbetter
exhibit it to exhibit
supportbetter support
and stability
and stability
compared to compared
conventional to conventional
scaffolds [84].scaffolds [84].
al. [85]
Yim et al. [85] developed
developed aa magnetically
magnetically driven untethered soft capsule robot for
wireless biopsy,
wireless biopsy, which
which comes
comes with
with an
an endoscope
endoscope that carries and releases a large number
of thermal sensitizers to grasp the sample by micro gripping jaws after the desired location
in the stomach, as shown in Figure 12.
Micro–bio–printing technology in medicine is still in its infancy, with limited print
speed, resolution, and complexity of print patterns. The use of MNP in the life support
system requires consideration of biocompatibility, the type of MNP, and its strategy for
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 20 of 27
Figure
Figure12.
12.Magnetically
Magneticallydriven
drivenunbound
unboundsoftgel (adapted
softgel from
(adapted with
from thethe
with permission from
permission Ref.
from [85],
Ref. [85],
2014, IEEE
2014, Transactions
IEEE onon
Transactions Bio–medical Engineering).
Bio–medical Engineering).
Micro–bio–printing
4.2. Applications technology
in the Field of Robotics in medicine is still in its infancy, with limited print
speed, resolution, and complexity of print
The field of robotics requires a high patterns.
degree The usecomplexity
of structural of MNP inand
the life support
structural
automation. There has long been a commitment to create untethered, intelligent robotsfor
system requires consideration of biocompatibility, the type of MNP, and its strategy
incorporation
capable into polymers.
of performing tasks on a small scale. The use of magnetic control is of great
importance for robot actuation because the driving magnetic field can easily and
4.2. Applications in the Field of Robotics
harmlessly penetrate most synthetic and biological materials [86–88].
The field of robotics requires a high degree of structural complexity and structural
There are many such robots: small, untethered robots that can noninvasively enter
automation. There has long been a commitment to create untethered, intelligent robots
confined spaces can be used in bioengineering, such as single–cell manipulation and
capable of performing tasks on a small scale. The use of magnetic control is of great
biosensing, and microfactories, such as building tissue scaffolds via robotic assembly, and
importance for robot actuation because the driving magnetic field can easily and harmlessly
in healthcare, such as targeted drug delivery and minimally invasive surgery. However,
penetrate most synthetic and biological materials [86–88].
existing small robots are unable to recognize changes in texture or material in
There are many such robots: small, untethered robots that can noninvasively enter con-
unstructured environments or autonomously bypass obstacles, and they have limited
fined spaces can be used in bioengineering, such as single–cell manipulation and biosensing,
mobility. Xu et al. [89] designed a spiral miniature swimming robot driven by a magnetic
and microfactories, such as building tissue scaffolds via robotic assembly, and in healthcare,
field that can achieve three states of forward, dynamic stationary and backward, and can
such as targeted drug delivery and minimally invasive surgery. However, existing small
accomplish movement in complex environments (Figure 13a). It is expected that the
robots are unable to recognize changes in texture or material in unstructured environments
dynamic swimming phenomenon found in soft–tailed swimmers can be used for agile
or autonomously bypass obstacles, and they have limited mobility. Xu et al. [89] designed
and fine motion
a spiral miniature control of soft robot
swimming micro–robots;
driven bysoft robots have
a magnetic fieldhigher
that candegrees
achieve ofthree
freedomstates
compared to rigid machines and can achieve high maneuverability
of forward, dynamic stationary and backward, and can accomplish movement in complexthrough multimodal
motion. Hu et al.
environments [90] 13a).
(Figure designed a small that
It is expected softthe
robot that can
dynamic accomplish
swimming multimodal
phenomenon found
movement by controlling
in soft–tailed swimmersacan magnetic
be usedfield to accomplish
for agile controlcontrol
and fine motion of its movement, and the
of soft micro–robots;
robot
soft can not have
robots only swim
higherinside andofonfreedom
degrees the surface of liquid,
compared to but
rigidalso roll andand
machines walk onachieve
can solid
surfaces, jump over obstacles, and crawl in narrow tunnels.
high maneuverability through multimodal motion. Hu et al. [90] designed a small soft robot
Ascan
that analyzed
accomplish in the above studies,
multimodal movementflexible
by magnetic
controllingmini–robots utilize
a magnetic field to patterned
accomplish
magnetization to achieve and
control of its movement, rapidthetransformation
robot can not onlyof complex
swim insidethree–dimensional
and on the surface (3D)of
shapes,
liquid, solving
but also rollcurrent problems
and walk faced
on solid by micro–robots
surfaces, in drugand
jump over obstacles, delivery,
crawl inobject
narrow
manipulation,
tunnels. and minimally invasive surgery. However, micro–robot design is limited
by existing methods for patterning magnetic particles of flexible materials. To address this
problem, Xu et al. [91] developed a UV lithography–based method for conforming
permanent magnetic particles in planar composites, resulting in a six–armed soft
soft robot (Figure 13c); Venkiteswaran et al. [93] developed an untethered magnetically
controlled quadruped soft robot with a rotating magnetic field as the driving field to
deform the legs to move perpendicular to the body plane (Figure 13d); and Li et al. [94]
developed a magnetically–controlled nanosoft robotic fish with a maximum velocity of
30.9 um/s by applying an oscillating magnetic field to drive its lateral displacement with
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 a backward traveling wave generated by the interaction between the body and the tail21 offin
27
(Figure 13e).
Figure 13. Magnetically controlled robot. (a) Spiral microswimming robot. (b) Six–armed soft
Figure 13. Magnetically
microgripper. controlled
(c) Flower robot. robot. (a) soft
(d) Quadruped Spiral microswimming
rRobot. (e) Nanosoftrobot.
robot (b)
fishSix–armed soft
(adapted from
microgripper. (c) Flower robot. (d) Quadruped soft rRobot. (e) Nanosoft robot fish (adapted
with the permission from Ref. [89], 2019, IEEE ASME Transactions on Mechatronics. Ref. [91], from
with the permission from Ref. [89], 2019, IEEE ASME Transactions on Mechatronics. Ref. [91],
2021,ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. Ref. [92], 2016, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
2021,ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. Ref. [92], 2016, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. Ref.
Ref. [93], 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. Ref. [94], 2016, Small).
[93], 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. Ref. [94], 2016, Small).
As analyzed in the above studies, flexible magnetic mini–robots utilize patterned
4.3. Applications in the Field of Intelligent Device Manufacturing
magnetization to achieve rapid transformation of complex three–dimensional (3D) shapes,
Magnetically
solving controlled
current problems 4D by
faced printing opens a in
micro–robots new door
drug for the object
delivery, field ofmanipulation,
smart sensor
devices
and as well. invasive
minimally In recentsurgery.
years, there has been
However, a strong demand
micro–robot design isforlimited
flexiblebyelectronic
existing
devices and wearable electronic devices, and magnetically controlled 4D
methods for patterning magnetic particles of flexible materials. To address this problem, Xu printing
technology
et for smartamaterials
al. [91] developed has given newmethod
UV lithography–based ideas and
for approaches
conforming to this research
permanent field.
magnetic
For example,
particles the polymer–based
in planar substrates
composites, resulting in aof deformable
six–armed softRF devices reported
microgripper by Fu et
with complex
al. [95] are that
geometry expected to be prepared
can perform with the
translation aid ofdirections:
in three 4D printingyaw,
devices [96].
pitch, Fundamental
and transverse
studies rotation
rocking of multistable flexural
(Figure 13b). modes and associated
UV lithography–based probabilistic
methods allow geometric
for the fabrication
transformations
of multiple planar underlie robust and
micro–robots withreproducible engineering
different sizes, behavior. These
different geometries, concepts
and arbitrary
have the potential
magnetization for in
profiles a awide
singlerange of applications
precursor. In addition,compatible with state–of–the–art
3D magnetization profiles allow
for multiple
planar combinations
thin–film materialsofandbending and torsion
microsystems on a single Wu
technologies; pieceetofal.polymer, enablinga
[32] proposed
previously unattainable
material combination shapetovariations
concept and micro–robotic
build 4D printed devices whosemotions, such and
properties as multi–arm
functions
force
can be grasping
changed and
in multi–legged paddle crawling.
a controlled manner. 4D printed devices consist of conductive and
Nature–inspired actuators that can be driven by various stimuli are an emerging
application in mobile microrobotics and microfluidics. Gao et al. [92] used ferromagnetic
particles and silicon–based polymers to fabricate a flower–like magnetically controlled
soft robot (Figure 13c); Venkiteswaran et al. [93] developed an untethered magnetically
controlled quadruped soft robot with a rotating magnetic field as the driving field to deform
the legs to move perpendicular to the body plane (Figure 13d); and Li et al. [94] developed
a magnetically–controlled nanosoft robotic fish with a maximum velocity of 30.9 um/s by
applying an oscillating magnetic field to drive its lateral displacement with a backward
traveling wave generated by the interaction between the body and the tail fin (Figure 13e).
reproducible
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW engineering behavior. These concepts have the potential for a wide range 23 of of
28
applications compatible with state–of–the–art planar thin–film materials and microsystems
technologies; Wu et al. [32] proposed a material combination concept to build 4D printed
devices whose properties and functions can be changed in a controlled manner. 4D printed
magnetic
devices components
consist that and
of conductive enable the integrated
magnetic componentsdevices to the
that enable display piezoelectric
integrated devices
properties, even though neither component is a separate piezoelectric
to display piezoelectric properties, even though neither component is a separate piezoelec-device, using a
composite
tric device,material
using a consisting
compositeof PU powder
material and NdFeB
consisting of PUparticles
powder to andprint devices
NdFeB that can
particles to
perform
print piezoelectric
devices conversion
that can perform functions
piezoelectric under external
conversion functionsmagnetic field excitation,
under external magnetic
whichexcitation,
field can be usedwhichas can
a manometer,
be used as as shown in Figure
a manometer, as shown14. This work14.
in Figure opens
Thisawork
new
manufacturing method of flexible magnetoelectric devices and provides
opens a new manufacturing method of flexible magnetoelectric devices and provides a new a new material
combination
material concept for
combination the property–changed
concept and functionality–changed
for the property–changed 4D printing.
and functionality–changed 4D
As the research and development of magnetron 4D printing technology
printing. As the research and development of magnetron 4D printing technology continues continues to
advance,
to advance, thethe
application
application ofofthis
thistechnology
technologyininthetheabove
abovefields
fieldswill
will continue
continue to deepen
to deepen
and, at the same time, will expand the application space in
and, at the same time, will expand the application space in more fields.more fields.
Figure 14. Piezoelectric conversion devices based on composite prints made of thermoplastics and
Figure 14. Piezoelectric conversion devices based on composite prints made of thermoplastics and
magnetically induced particles (adapted from with the permission from Ref. [32], 2020, Advanced
magnetically induced particles (adapted from with the permission from Ref. [32], 2020, Advanced
science).
science).
5. Conclusions
5. Conclusions
This paper presents a systematic study of the current status of research on magnetically
This 4D
controlled paper presents
printing a systematic
technology, study
the process, andof the current Magnetically
its applications. status of research
controlledon
magnetically
4D controlled
printing fully 4D printing
applies magnetic smarttechnology,
materials onthe theprocess,
basis of 3Dandprinting
its applications.
to achieve
Magnetically controlled
controllability of shape, 4D printing fully
performance, andapplies
function magnetic smart materials
of components under theon action
the basisof
of 3D printing to achieve
controlled magnetic fields. controllability of shape, performance, and function of
components under the action of controlled magnetic fields.
Magnetically controlled 4D printing technology has made great progress in the past
Magnetically
few years, but it iscontrolled 4D printing
still in its infancy. technology
Printing methods hashave
made great progress
significant in theDIW
limitations; past
few years,is but
printing it is stillthe
currently in most
its infancy.
likely Printing
practicalmethods
application haveofsignificant limitations;
the technology, withDIWlow
printing is requirements,
equipment currently the most likely practicalcosts,
low manufacturing application
a wide of the of
range technology, withhigh
raw materials, low
equipment
molding requirements,
accuracy, low manufacturing
manufacturing costs,
flexibility, and othera wide range ofbut
advantages, raw materials,
curing, high
sintering,
molding
and otheraccuracy,
processing manufacturing
are needed flexibility,
after directand other advantages,
writing, but curing,
and the accuracy of itssintering,
molding
and other processing
components are influenced are needed after direct
by a variety writing,
of factors. and 4D
Existing theprinting
accuracyequipment
of its molding
does
components
not are influenced
have specific standards, and by athevariety of factors.
functionality ExistingThe
is limited. 4D future
printing equipmentof
development does
4D
printing
not haverequires
specificthe participation
standards, and theof multiple fields to
functionality is create
limited.4DThe
printing
futuredevices with more
development of
comprehensive
4D printing requiresfunctions. Nowadays,ofthere
the participation are few
multiple fieldstypes of existing
to create printing
4D printing materials,
devices with
and
moreprinting productsfunctions.
comprehensive have greatNowadays,
limitations.there
Researchers
are fewshould
types pay attention
of existing to the
printing
innovation of new materials, printing schemes, and printing processes;
materials, and printing products have great limitations. Researchers should pay attention otherwise, there
will beinnovation
to the stagnation.of4D new printing
materials,is a printing
disruptive new manufacturing
schemes, technology
and printing processes; that will
otherwise,
have
there broad
will beapplications
stagnation. in 4Dmany fields.
printing is aPeople are already
disruptive using 4D printing
new manufacturing technology
technology that
will have broad applications in many fields. People are already using 4D printing
technology to achieve organ printing and minimally invasive printing in situ [97]. With
technological innovation, we expect to achieve 4D printing of human organs, 4D printing
of autonomous detection in outer space, etc.
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 23 of 27
to achieve organ printing and minimally invasive printing in situ [97]. With technological
innovation, we expect to achieve 4D printing of human organs, 4D printing of autonomous
detection in outer space, etc.
New magnetically controlled printing technologies, new smart materials, new struc-
tural design, and development of modeling tools and software will continue to drive the
progress of magnetically controlled 4D printing technology, and its application areas will
be more extensive. A great deal of research and application development work will be
needed for magnetically controlled 4D printing technology in the future.
In order to develop and improve magnetically controlled 4D printing technology, the
following aspects need attention.
(1) There is an urgent need to standardize experimental equipment and develop high–
precision printers. The current equipment on printing is all developed by the labora-
tory itself, which has limited capacity, and there will be a more rapid development
with the participation of professional manufacturers in the research.
(2) There is a need to focus on the original innovation of 4D printing materials, encourage
more systematic research on original solutions, increase the research on the trans-
formation mechanism of 4D printing materials, explore more optimal design and
methods of 4D printing controllable deformation components, and innovate 4D print-
ing processes. There is also a need to develop more highly sensitive materials to
improve the dynamic characteristics of the device and to reduce the impact of the
required shape, property, or function transformation on the component itself during
the printing process.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, H.W.; methodology, H.W.; investigation, J.Z. and Z.L.
(Zhuo Luo); resources, Z.L. (Zhenkun Li); writing—original draft preparation, J.Z. and Z.L. (Zhuo
Luo); writing—review and editing, H.W.; J.Z. and Z.L. (Zhuo Luo); supervision, Z.L. (Zhenkun Li);
project administration, H.W.; funding acquisition, H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the
published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This work was financially supported by Education and teaching reform project of China
University of Labor Relations, with grant number JG22085; Student research project of China Uni-
versity of Labor Relations, with grant number 23xjx095; Beijing higher education undergraduate
teaching reform and innovation project(2022), with grant number 36; Second Batch of New Engineer-
ing Research and Practice Projects of the Ministry of Education, with grant number E-XTYR20200608.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Ma, S.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, M.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, L.; Ren, L. 4D printing of PLA/PCL shape memory
composites with controllable sequential deformation. Bio-Des. Manuf. 2021, 4, 867–878. [CrossRef]
2. Mao, Y.; Ding, Z.; Yuan, C.; Ai, S.; Michael, L.; Wu, J.; Wang, T.; Qi, H.J. 3D Printed reversible shape changing components with
stimuli responsive materials. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24761. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Liu, Y.; Shaw, B.; Dickey, M.D.; Genzer, J. Sequential self-folding of polymer sheets. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1602417. [CrossRef]
4. Ding, Z.; Yuan, C.; Peng, X.; Wang, T.; Qi, H.J.; Dunn, M.L. Direct 4D printing via active composite materials. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3,
e1602890. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Wei, H.; Cauchy, X.; Navas, I.O.; Abderrafai, Y.; Chizari, K.; Sundararaj, U.; Liu, Y.; Leng, J.; Therriault, D. Direct 3D printing of
hybrid nanofiber-based nanocomposites for highly conductive and shape memory applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017,
3, 1602417. [CrossRef]
6. Hu, X.; Ge, Z.; Wang, X.; Jiao, N.; Tung, S.; Liu, L. Multifunctional thermo-magnetically actuated hybrid soft millirobot based on
4D printing. Compos. Part B Eng. 2022, 228, 109451. [CrossRef]
7. Nadgorny, M.; Xiao, Z.; Chen, C.; Connal, L.A. Three-dimensional printing of pH-responsive and functional polymers on an
affordable desktop printer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 28946–28954. [CrossRef]
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 24 of 27
8. Hu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, J. Recent advances in shape-memory polymers: Structure, mechanism, functionality,
modeling and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1720–1763. [CrossRef]
9. Zhao, Q.; Qi, H.J.; Xie, T. Recent progress in shape memory polymer: New behavior, enabling materials, and mechanistic
understanding. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 49–50, 79–120. [CrossRef]
10. Tibbits, S.; Mcknelly, C.; Olguin, C.; Dikovsky, D.; Hirsch, S. 4D printing and universal transformation. In Proceedings of the 34th
Annual Conference of the Association-for-Computer-Aided-Design-in-Architecture, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 23–25 October 2014;
pp. 539–548.
11. Sonatkar, J.; Kandasubramanian, B.; Ismail, S. 4D printing: Pragmatic progression in biofabrication. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 169,
111–128. [CrossRef]
12. Khan, M.S.; Khan, S.A.; Shabbir, S.; Umar, M.; Mohapatra, S.; Khuroo, T.; Naseef, P.P.; Kuruniyan, M.S.; Lqbal, Z.; Mirza, M.A.
Raw materials, technology, healthcare applications, patent repository and clinical trials on 4D printing technology: An updated
review. Pharmaceutics 2022, 15, 116. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Ghosh, A.; Nag, S.; Gomes, A.; Gosavi, A.; Ghule, G.; Kundu, A.; Purohit, B.; Srivastava, R. Applications of smart material sensors
and soft electronics in healthcare wearables for better user compliance. Micromachines 2023, 14, 121. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Tang, J.; Guo, H.; Hong, J. Modeling and design of a soft pneumatic finger for hand rehabilitation. In
Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation, Lijiang, China, 8–10 August 2015; pp.
2460–2465.
15. Tolley, M.T.; Shepherd, R.F.; Mosadegh, B.; Galloway, K.C.; Wehner, M.; Karpelson, M.; Wood, R.J.; Whitesides, G.M. A resilient,
untethered soft robot. Soft Robot. 2014, 1, 213–223. [CrossRef]
16. Methenitis, G.; Hennes, D.; Lzzo, D.; Visser, A. Novelty search for soft robotic space exploration. In Proceedings of the Genetic
and Evolutionary Computation Conference, ACM, Madrid, Spain, 11–15 July 2015; pp. 193–200.
17. Galloway, K.; Becker, K.; Phillips, B.; Kirby, J.; Licht, S.; Tchernov, D.; Wood, R. Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on
deep reefs. Soft Robot. 2016, 3, 23–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Chen, Y.; Wainwright, D.K.; Kenaley, C.P.; Gong, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, H.; Guan, J.; Wang, T.; et al. A biorobotic
adhesive disc for underwater hitchhiking inspired by the remora suckerfish. Sci. Robot. 2017, 2, eaan8072. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. Alshahrani, H. Review of 4D printing materials and reinforced composites: Behaviors, applications, and challenges. J. Sci. Adv.
Mater. Devices 2021, 6, 167–185. [CrossRef]
20. Bai, J.; Bu, G. Progress in 4D printing technology. J. Adv. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2022, 2, 2022001. [CrossRef]
21. Liang, X.; Jiang, X.; Gu, J.; Bai, J.; Guan, Z.; Li, Z.; Yan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Esling, C.; Zhao, X.; et al. 5M and 7M martensitic stability
and associated physical properties in Ni50 Mn35 In15 alloy: First-principles calculations and experimental verification. Scr. Mater.
2021, 204, 114140. [CrossRef]
22. Streubel, R.; Liu, X.; Wu, X.; Russell, T.P. Perspective: Ferromagnetic liquids. Materials 2020, 13, 2712. [CrossRef]
23. Fan, X.; Jiang, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, C.; Mao, L.; Xie, H.; Sun, L.; Yang, Z.; Sitti, M. Scale-reconfigurable miniature ferrofluidic
robots for negotiating sharply variable spaces. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabq1677. [CrossRef]
24. Liu, X.; Noah, K.; Alejandro, C.; Robert, S.; Jiang, Y.; Chai, Y.; Kim, P.Y.; Joe, F.; Frances, H.; Shi, S. Reconfigurable ferromagnetic
liquid droplets. Science 2019, 365, 264–267. [CrossRef]
25. Korde, J.; Kandasubramanian, B. Naturally biomimicked smart shape memory hydrogels for biomedical functions. Chem. Eng. J.
2020, 379, 122430. [CrossRef]
26. Gang, F.; Yan, H.; Ma, C.; Jiang, L.; Gu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Sun, X. Robust magnetic double-network
hydrogels with self-healing, MR imaging, cytocompatibility and 3D printability. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 9801–9804. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
27. Breger, J.C.; Yoon, C.; Xiao, R.; Kwag, H.R.; Wang, M.O.; Fisher, J.P.; Nguyen, T.D.; Gracias, D.H. Self-folding thermo-magnetically
responsive soft microgrippers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 7, 3398–3405. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Chen, Z.; Zhao, D.; Liu, B.; Nian, G.; Li, X.; Yin, J.; Qu, S.; Yang, W. 3D printing of multifunctional hydrogels. Adv. Funct. Mater.
2019, 29, 1900971. [CrossRef]
29. Simińska-Stanny, J.; Nizioł, M.; Szymczyk-Ziółkowska, P.; Brozyna, M.; Adam, J.; Shavandi, A.; Podstawczyk, D. 4D printing of
patterned multimaterial magnetic hydrogel actuators. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 49, 102506. [CrossRef]
30. Tang, J.; Tong, Z.; Xia, Y.; Liu, M.; Lv, Z.; Gao, Y.; Lu, T.; Xie, S.; Pei, Y.; Fang, D.; et al. Super tough magnetic hydrogels for
remotely triggered shapemorphing. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 2713–2722. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Zhang, F.; Wang, L.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Leng, J. Magnetic programming of 4D printed shape memory composite structures.
Compos. Part A 2019, 125, 105571. [CrossRef]
32. Wu, H.; Zhang, X.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, C.; Ai, J.; Chen, P.; Yan, C.; Su, B.; Shi, Y. A material combination concept to realize 4D printed
products with newly emerging property/functionality. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1903208. [CrossRef]
33. Paul, D.I.; McGehee, W.; O’Handley, R.C.; Richard, M. Ferromagnetic shape memory alloys: A theoretical approach. J. Appl. Phys.
2007, 101, 123917. [CrossRef]
34. Caputo, M.P.; Berkowitz, A.E.; Armstrong, A.; Müllner, P.; Solomon, C.V. 4D printing of net shape parts made from Ni-Mn-Ga
magnetic shape memory alloys. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 21, 579–588. [CrossRef]
35. Lin, C. Design and Mechanical Properties of 4D Printed Shape Memory Polymer Tissue Engineering Scaffold. Ph.D. Thesis,
Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 2022.
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 25 of 27
36. Kawashita, M. Ceramic microspheres for biomedical applications. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2005, 2, 173–183. [CrossRef]
37. Marcus, H.L.; Beaman, J.J.; Barlow, J.W.; Bourell, D. Solid freeform fabrication-powder processing. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 1990, 69,
1030–1031.
38. Sachs, E.; Cima, M.; Williams, P.; Brancazio, J.; Cornie, J. Three-dimensional printing: Rapid tooling and prototypes directly from
a CAD model. CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol. 1990, 39, 201–204. [CrossRef]
39. He, B.; Yang, J.; Zhou, M. Development of bioceramics as heat seeds and drug carriers at the same time. Glass Enamel 2007, 35,
15–18.
40. Martin, J.J.; Fiore, B.E.; Erb, R.M. Designing bioinspired composite reinforcement architectures via 3D magnetic printing. Nat.
Commun. 2015, 6, 8641. [CrossRef]
41. Pegna, J. Exploratory investigation of solid freeform construction. Autom. Constr. 1997, 5, 427–437. [CrossRef]
42. Muthukrishnan, S.; Ramakrishnan, S.; Sanjayan, J. Technologies for improving buildability in 3D concrete printing. Cem. Concr.
Compos. 2021, 122, 104144. [CrossRef]
43. Jin, X. Preparation of Magnetically Oriented Steel Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites Based on 3D Printing and Study on
Mechanical Properties of Beams. Master’s Thesis, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China, 2019. [CrossRef]
44. Lee, Y.A.; An, J.; Chua, K.C. Two-way 4D printing: A review on the reversibility of 3D-printed shape memory materials.
Engineering 2017, 3, 663–674. [CrossRef]
45. Sossou, G.; Demoly, F.; Belkebir, H.; Qi, H.J.; Gomes, S.; Montavon, G. Design for 4D printing: Modeling and computation of
smart materials distributions. Mater. Des. 2019, 181, 108074. [CrossRef]
46. Yoonho, K. Printing ferromagnetic domains for untethered fast-transforming soft materials. Nature 2018, 7709, 274–279.
47. Zhu, P.; Yang, W.; Wang, R.; Gao, S.; Li, B.; Li, Q. 4D printing of complex structures with a fast response time to magnetic stimulus.
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 36435–36442. [CrossRef]
48. Podstawczyk, D.; Nizio, M.; Szymczyk, P.; Wiśniewski, P. 3D printed stimuli-responsive magnetic nanoparticle embedded
alginate-methylcellulose hydrogel actuators. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 34, 101275. [CrossRef]
49. Wu, S.; Hamel, C.; Ze, Q.; Yang, F.; Qi, H.J.; Zhao, R. Evolutionary algorithm-guided voxel-encoding printing of functional
hard-magnetic soft active materials. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2020, 2, 2000060. [CrossRef]
50. Mei, S.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Ding, B.; Li, S.; Chen, X.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Cui, Z.; et al. 4D printing of polyamide
1212 based shape memory thermoplastic polyamide elastomers by selective laser sintering. J. Manuf. Process. 2023, 92, 157–164.
[CrossRef]
51. Yuan, S.; Zheng, Y.; Chua, K.C.; Yan, Q.; Zhou, K. Electrical and thermal conductivities of MWCNT/polymer composites
fabricated by selective laser sintering. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 105, 203–213. [CrossRef]
52. Tan, L.J.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, K. Recent progress on polymer materials for additive manufacturing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30,
2003062. [CrossRef]
53. Deng, H.; Sattari, K.; Xie, Y.; Liao, P.; Yan, Z.; Lin, J. Laser reprogramming magnetic anisotropy in soft composites for reconfigurable
3D shaping. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6325. [CrossRef]
54. Wu, H.; Wang, O.; Tian, Y.; Wang, M.; Su, B.; Yan, C.; Zhou, K.; Shi, Y. Selective laser sintering-based 4D printing of magnetism-
responsive grippers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 13, 12679–12688. [CrossRef]
55. Forth, J.; Liu, X.; Hasnain, J.; Toor, A.; Miszta, K.; Shi, S.; Geissler, P.; Emrick, T.; Helms, B.A.; Russell, T.P. Reconfigurable printed
liquids. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1707603. [CrossRef]
56. Siddharth, J.; Krishna, R.; Karunakarnran, C.; Vasudevan, R.; Arun, T.M.; Krzysztof, K.; Vijay, K.T.; Balan, A.S.S. 4D printing of
materials for the future: Opportunities and challenges. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 18, 100490.
57. Ge, L.; Dong, L.; Wang, D.; Ge, Q.; Gu, G. A digital light processing 3D printer for fast and high-precision fabrication of soft
pneumatic actuators. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 273, 285–292. [CrossRef]
58. Hodaei, A.; Akhlaghi, O.; Khani, N.; Aytas, T.; Sezer, D.; Tatli, B.; Menceloglu, Y.Z.; Koc, B.; Akbulut, O. Supporting information-
single additive enables 3D printing of highly-loaded iron oxide suspensions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 9873–9881.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
59. Yang, G.; Sun, Y.; Qin, L.; Li, M.; Ou, K.; Fang, J.; Fu, Q. Direct-ink-writing (DIW) 3D printing functional composite materials
based on supra-molecular interaction. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 215, 109013. [CrossRef]
60. Yang, G.; Guan, R.; Zhen, H. Tunable size of hierarchically porous alumina ceramics based on DIW 3D printing supramolecular
gel. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 10998–11005. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
61. Frascella, F.; Gonzalez, G.; Bosch, P.; Angelini, A. 3D printed photoluminescent polymeric waveguides. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
2018, 10, 39319–39326. [CrossRef]
62. Geng, J. A volumetric 3D display based on a DLP projection engine. Displays 2013, 34, 39–48. [CrossRef]
63. He, X.; Yang, F.; Liu, C.; Dai, M. A dual-frequency fringe projection three-dimensional shape measurement system using a DLP
3D projector. Opt. Commun. 2017, 382, 294–301.
64. Lantean, S.; Barrera, G.; Pirri, C.F.; Tiberto, P.; Sangermano, M.; Roppolo, I.; Rizza, G. 3D printing of magnetoresponsive polymeric
materials with tunable mechanical and magnetic properties by digital light processing. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1900505.
[CrossRef]
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 26 of 27
65. Ma, C.; Wu, S.; Ze, Q.; Kuang, X.; Zhang, R.; Qi, H.J.; Zhao, R. Magnetic multimaterial printing for multimodal shape trans-
formation with tunable properties and shiftable mechanical behaviors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 12639–12648.
[CrossRef]
66. Zhou, A.; Xu, C.; Kanitthamniyom, P.; Ng, C.S.X.; Lim, G.J.; Lew, W.S.; Vasoo, S.; Zhang, X.; Lum, G.Z.; Zhang, Y. Magnetic soft
millirobots 3D printed by circulating vat photopolymerization to manipulate droplets containing hazardous agents for in vitro
diagnostics. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 202200061. [CrossRef]
67. Blumenschein, L.H.; Gan, L.T.; Fan, J.A.; Okamura, A.M.; Hawkes, E.W. A tip-extending soft robot enables reconfigurable and
deployable antennas. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2018, 3, 949–956. [CrossRef]
68. Joyee, E.B.; Pan, Y. A fully three-dimensional printed inchworm-inspired soft robot with magnetic actuation. Soft Robot. 2019, 6,
333–345. [CrossRef]
69. Aydemir, G.; Varol, R.; Tarar, C.; Omeroglu, S.; Ustomar, E.O.; Gul, B.E.; Uvet, H. A new method for creating a wound model
with micro-robot in microfluidic device. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Manipulation, Automation and
Robotics at Small Scales, Toronto, ON, Canada, 13–17 July 2020; p. 9307868.
70. Ceylan, H.; Dogan, O.N.; Yasa, I.C.; Musaoglu, M.N.; Kulali, Z.U.; Sitti, M. 3D printed personalized magnetic micromachines
from patient blood–derived biomaterials. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabh0273. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
71. Kuang, X.; Wu, S.; Ze, Q.; Yue, L.; Jin, Y.; Montgomery, S.M.; Yang, F.; Qi, H.J.; Zhao, R. Magnetic dynamic polymers for modular
assembling and reconfigurable morphing architectures. Adv. Mater. 2020, 33, 2102113. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
72. Song, H.; Lee, H.; Lee, J.; Choe, J.K.; Lee, S.; Yi, J.Y.; Park, S.; Yoo, J.W.; Kwon, M.S.; Kim, J. Reprogrammable ferromagnetic
domains for reconfigurable soft magnetic actuators. Adv. Mater. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 2–37. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
73. Chang, B.; Sha, X.; Guo, J.; Jiao, Y.; Wang, C.; Yang, W. Thermo and pH dual responsive, polymer shell coated, magnetic
mesoporous silica nanoparticles for controlled drug release. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 9239–9247. [CrossRef]
74. Peters, C.; Hoop, M.; Pané, S.; Nelson, B.J.; Hierold, C. Degradable magnetic composites for minimally invasive interventions:
Device fabrication, targeted drug delivery, and cytotoxicity tests. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 533–538. [CrossRef]
75. Casolaro, M.; Casolaro, I. Pulsed release of antidepressants from nanocomposite hydrogels. Biol. Eng. Med. 2017, 3, 1000132.
[CrossRef]
76. Deb, D.S.; Keya, G.; Jin, H.; Aayushi, R.; Md, M.; KiTaek, L. A 3D bioprinted nanoengineered hydrogel with photo-activated drug
delivery for tumor apoptosis and simultaneous bone regeneration via macrophage immunomodulation. Macromol. Biosci. 2023.
[CrossRef]
77. Lin, C.; Lv, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L.; Leng, J. 4D-printed biodegradable and remotely controllable shape memory
occlusion devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1906569. [CrossRef]
78. Xu, F.; Wu, C.M.; Rengarajan, V.; Finley, T.D.; Keles, H.O.; Sung, Y.; Li, B.; Gurkan, U.A.; Demirci, U. Three-dimensional magnetic
assembly of microscale hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 4254–4260. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
79. Panseri, S.; Russo, A.; Giavaresi, G.; Sartori, M.; Veronesi, F.; Fini, M.; Salter, D.M.; Ortolani, A.; Strazzari, A.; Visani, A.; et al.
Innovative magnetic scaffolds for orthopedic tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2012, 100A, 2278–2286. [CrossRef]
80. Kokkinis, D.; Schaffner, M.; Studart, A.R. Multimaterial magnetically assisted 3D printing of composite materials. Natl. Commun.
2015, 6, 8643. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
81. Sapir-Lekhovitser, Y.; Rotenberg, M.Y.; Jopp, J.; Friedman, G.; Polyak, B.; Cohen, S. Magnetically actuated tissue engineered
scaffold: Insights into mechanism of physical stimulation. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 3386–3399. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
82. Fuhrer, R.; Hofmann, S.; Hild, N.; Vetsch, J.R.; Herrmann, I.K.; Grass, I.K.; Stark, W.J. Pressureless mechanical induction of stem
cell differentiation is dose and frequency dependent. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, 81362. [CrossRef]
83. Zhao, W.; Zhang, F.; Leng, J.; Liu, Y. Personalized 4D printing of bioinspired tracheal scaffold concept based on magnetic
stimulated shape memory composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 184, 107866. [CrossRef]
84. Lin, C.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L.; Leng, J. 4D printing of personalized shape memory polymer vascular stents with negative
Poisson’s ratio structure: A preliminary study. Sci. China (Technol. Sci.) 2020, 63, 52–62. [CrossRef]
85. Yim, S.; Gultepe, E.; Gracias, D.H.; Sitti, M. Biopsy using a magnetic capsule endoscope carrying, releasing, and retrieving
untethered microgrippers. IEEE Trans. Bio-Med. Eng. 2014, 61, 513–521.
86. Verma, V.; Hancock, W.O.; Catchmark, J.M. Micro- and nanofabrication processes for hybrid synthetic and biological system
fabrication. IEEE Trans. Adv. Packag. 2005, 28, 584–593. [CrossRef]
87. Sthijns, M.; Blitterswijk, C.A.V.; Lapointe, V. Synthetic materials that affect the extracellular matrix via cellular metabolism and
responses to a metabolic state. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 742132. [CrossRef]
88. Othman, S.F.; Ozer, M.B.; Xu, H.; Royston, T.J.; Magin, R.L. Radiation force of ultrasound as shear wave source in microscopic
magnetic resonance elastography. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005, 118, 2006–2016. [CrossRef]
89. Xu, T.; Yu, J.; Vong, C.; Wang, B.; Wu, X.; Zhang, L. Dynamic morphology and swimming properties of rotating miniature
swimmers with soft tails. IEEE ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2019, 24, 924–934. [CrossRef]
90. Hu, W.; Lum, G.Z.; Mastrangeli, M.; Sitti, M. Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion. Nature 2018, 554, 81–85.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
91. Xu, T.; Zhang, J.; Salehizadeh, M.; Onaizah, O.; Diller, E. Millimeter-scale flexible robots with programmable three-dimensional
magnetization and motions. Sci. Robot. 2019, 4, eaav4494. [CrossRef]
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 204 27 of 27
92. Gao, W.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, H. Magnetic driving flowerlike soft platform: Biomimetic fabrication and external regulation.
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 14182–14189. [CrossRef]
93. Venkiteswaran, V.K.; Samaniego, L.F.P.; Sikorski, J.; Misra, S. Bio-inspired terrestrial motion of magnetic soft millirobots. IEEE
Robot. Autom. Lett. 2019, 4, 1753–1759. [CrossRef]
94. Li, T.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Chang, X.; Song, W.; Hu, Y.; Shao, G.; Sandraz, E.; Zhang, G.; Li, L.; et al. Magnetically propelled fish-like
nanoswimmers. Small 2016, 12, 6098–6105. [CrossRef]
95. Fu, H.; Nan, K.; Bai, W.; Huang, W.; Bai, K.; Lu, L.; Zhou, C.; Liu, Y.; Liu, F.; Wang, J.; et al. Morphable 3D mesostructures and
microelectronic devices by multistable buckling mechanics. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 268. [CrossRef]
96. Park, J.K.; Nan, K.; Luan, H.; Zheng, N.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, X.; Wang, H.; Li, K.; Xie, T.; et al. Remotely triggered
assembly of 3D mesostructures through shape-memory effects. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1905715. [CrossRef]
97. Zhou, C.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, Q.; Gu, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, X.; Yang, Y.; Tang, H.; Ling, Q.; et al. Ferromagnetic soft catheter robots
for minimally invasive bioprinting. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5072. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.