Fem Lab5
Fem Lab5
Objective:
To find the deformation in a simply supported I-beam with uniformly varying load application across the
whole span, numerically and analytically
Problem Statement:
A I-section beam composed of structural steel material is subjected to a uniformly varying load in
cantilever state. Do simulation on ANSYS Workbench for Non-linear bending analysis and then validate
results by hand calculation.
Input Data:
We draw a I-section beam in ANSYS module. Its length is 500 mm and total height is 106 mm. Its width is
103 mm. Web thickness of I-beam structure is 7.1 mm. Flange thickness of beam is 8.8 inch.
Flange has a chamfer of 6 mm.
Assumptions:
We assumed “Structural Steel NL” as a material for I-section beam with a value of Y=250 MPa and
Tangent Modulus for Bilinear Isotropic Hardening is 1450 MPa. Our units are US Customary units.
Procedure:
1. Open Static Structure Analysis form left toolbox of Analysis Systems
2. Then double click on engineering data to add a required material, i.e. mild steel.
3. Now again in work bench, open geometry in Design Modeler and draw according to
given data. Then save it and exit the modeler.
4. Now mesh the model with default mesh sizing and add named selections if required.
Then refine the mesh sizing and save the project.
5. Apply boundary conditions and then the loadings conditions as given. Then save
the project.
6. Now click on solution and select the stress, deformation, then click solve.
7. It will show the ANSYS analysis of stress and deformation in geometry window. The
minimum and maximum values will be shown on side with colors.
8. Save the images of all analysis and save the project report.
1|Page
2|Page
Theory:
Introduction:
The deformation analysis of a simply supported I-beam under uniformly varying load application
across the whole span is a fundamental problem in structural engineering. This report aims to
provide a comprehensive analysis of the deformation behavior of such a beam using both
numerical (ANSYS Workbench) and analytical methods. The theoretical background,
methodology, and results of both approaches will be discussed in detail.
The deformation of a beam under load can be analyzed using principles of structural mechanics
and finite element analysis. When a load is applied to a beam, it induces internal stresses and
strains, resulting in deformation. The governing equations for beam deformation can be derived
from Euler-Bernoulli beam theory and Hooke's Law.
In ANSYS Workbench, the deformation analysis will be performed using finite element method
(FEM), where the beam geometry will be discretized into small elements. The material properties,
boundary conditions, and loading conditions will be applied to the model, and the software will
solve for the displacement and stress distribution throughout the beam.
Analytically, the deformation of the beam can be calculated using beam bending equations such as
the differential equation of the deflection curve and boundary conditions. By solving these
equations, the deflection at different points along the beam can be determined.
Theoretical Background:
1. Beam Bending Theory:
Beam bending theory provides a framework for analyzing the deformation of beams
under loading. The governing differential equation for deflection (δ) can be expressed as:
𝑑2𝑑𝑥2(𝐸𝐼𝑑2𝛿𝑑𝑥2)=−𝑞(𝑥)dx2d2(EIdx2d2δ)=−q(x) Where:
𝐸E is the Young's modulus of the material.
𝐼I is the moment of inertia of the beam's cross-section.
𝑞(𝑥)q(x) is the distributed load function along the beam's length.
3|Page
Two common theories used for beam bending analysis are:
Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory: Assumes that the beam experiences small deformations and
is subjected to pure bending. It relates the bending moment, curvature, and beam
deflection.
Timoshenko Beam Theory: Accounts for the effects of shear deformation and rotational
inertia, which are significant in beams with small dimensions or subjected to high shear
loads.
2. Simply Supported Beam:
A simply supported beam is a beam that is supported at both ends and free to rotate. It is
one of the simplest and most common types of beam configurations.
The boundary conditions for a simply supported beam typically include zero deflection
and zero bending moment at the supports.
3. Uniformly Varying Load:
A uniformly varying load is a load that varies linearly along the length of the beam. It
results in a triangular distribution of load intensity.
The total load applied over the span of the beam can be calculated by integrating the load
intensity function over the length of the beam.
Methodology:
1. Numerical Analysis (ANSYS Workbench):
Static Structure Analysis is conducted using ANSYS Workbench to simulate
the deformation of the simply supported I-beam.
The procedure includes geometry setup, mesh generation, application of boundary
conditions, loading setup with uniformly varying load, solution, and post-processing
to obtain stress and deformation results.
2. Analytical Calculation:
Analytical calculation of beam deformation involves applying beam bending theory
to determine the deflection of the simply supported I-beam.
The Euler-Bernoulli beam equation or the Timoshenko beam equation can be used to
derive the deflection equation based on the beam's geometry, material properties, and
loading conditions.
Boundary conditions are applied to solve the differential equation, and the
deflection equation is solved to obtain the deflection profile of the beam
6|Page
1. Moment of Inertia (I) of the Beam:
7|Page
For the web: 𝐼𝑤=112×103×(106−2×8.8)3Iw=121×103×(106−2×8.8)3 𝐼𝑤=112×103×(88.4)3Iw
=121×103×(88.4)3 𝐼𝑤=112×103×688284.704Iw=121×103×688284.704 𝐼𝑤=794096.839 mm4Iw
=794096.839mm4
For the flanges: 𝐼𝑓=2×(112×8.8×(106−8.8)3)If=2×(121×8.8×(106−8.8)3)
𝐼𝑓=2×(112×8.8×(97.2)3)If=2×(121×8.8×(97.2)3) 𝐼𝑓=2×(112×8.8×912932.16)If=2×(121
×8.8×912932.16) 𝐼𝑓=163343.579 mm4If=163343.579mm4
Total Moment of Inertia: 𝐼=𝐼𝑤+𝐼𝑓I=Iw+If 𝐼=794096.839+163343.579I
=794096.839+163343.579 𝐼
=957440.418 mm4I
=957440.418mm4
2. Deflection under Uniformly Varying Load:
Given that the load varies uniformly along the span of the beam, we can assume a linearly varying
load distribution.
Total Load: 𝑊=𝑞max2×𝐿W=2qmax×L
3. Beam Bending Equation:
The differential equation governing the deflection of the beam can be expressed as:
𝑑2𝑑𝑥2(𝐸𝐼𝑑2𝑦𝑑𝑥2)=−𝑞(𝑥)dx2d2(EIdx2d2y)=−q(x)
4. Boundary Conditions:
For a simply supported beam:
At 𝑥=0x=0 and 𝑥=𝐿x=L, 𝑦(0)=𝑦(𝐿)=0y(0)=y(L)=0
At 𝑥=0x=0 and 𝑥=𝐿x=L, 𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑥(0)=𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑥(𝐿)=0dxdy(0)=dxdy(L)=0
5. Solving the Differential Equation:
By solving the differential equation with the given boundary conditions, we can obtain the
deflection equation of the beam.
6. Deflection at Mid-Span:
Once we have the deflection equation, we can calculate the deflection at the midpoint of the beam
(𝑥=𝐿2)(x=2L).
First, we need to determine the maximum load per unit length 𝑞maxqmax. We'll assume a
uniformly varying load across the span of the beam. Given that the load is uniformly varying from
one end to the other, we can determine 𝑞maxqmax using the maximum load at the far end of the
beam.
8|Page
Let's denote:
Load at the far end of the beam = 𝑊farWfar
Length of the beam = 𝐿L
Given that the load varies linearly, the load at any point 𝑥x along the beam can be expressed as:
𝑞(𝑥)=𝑊far𝐿×𝑥q(x)=LWfar×x
The maximum load per unit length 𝑞maxqmax occurs at the far end of the beam (𝑥=𝐿x=L):
𝑞max=𝑊far𝐿×𝐿qmax=LWfar×L
𝑞max=𝑊farqmax=Wfar
Now, we'll use the given total load to find 𝑊farWfar and then proceed with the remaining
calculations.
Let's calculate the maximum load (𝑊farWfar) at the far end of the beam:
Given that the load varies linearly from one end to the other, the maximum load occurs at the far
end of the beam (𝑥=𝐿x=L).
Total Load (𝑊W) is not explicitly given, so we'll need to calculate it. However, it seems like a
crucial piece of information is missing. We'll proceed by assuming a total load, and if you have a
specific value for the total load, please provide it.
Assuming a total load of 𝑊=1000W=1000 N (for example purposes), we can calculate the
maximum load at the far end (𝑊farWfar) as follows:
𝑊far=𝑊2Wfar=2W
𝑊far=10002Wfar=21000
𝑊far=500 NWfar=500N
Now that we have the maximum load at the far end, we can proceed with the next steps of the
calculations. If you have the specific total load (𝑊W) or any other required information, please
provide it so we can proceed with more accurate calculations.
Procedure:
Firstly, start with ANSYS Static Structural and link it with Eigenvalue Buckling.
9|Page
Then we open the geometry:
10 | P a g e
Geometry and Meshing: The I-section strut geometry, including dimensions and fillet radii, was
modeled in ANSYS Workbench. A suitable mesh was generated to discretize the geometry for
accurate analysis. Then we updated the mesh .Then in the meshing we selected fine meshing
Material Properties: Material properties corresponding to structural steel were defined, including
the modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio.
Boundary Conditions and Load Application: Appropriate boundary conditions, such as fixed
or pinned ends, were applied to the strut model. A compressive load was incrementally applied,
and a linear buckling analysis was performed to determine the critical buckling load.
Then we went into setup model
In the boundary conditions we selected fixed sides
11 | P a g e
Then we updated the mesh
Then in the meshing we selected fine meshing
After that we applied fix support on one side of I-section Beam.
After that we apply point load force of 1N on top right side of I-section Beam.
Then we click on solve to obtain the numerical solutions.
Then in numerical results, we obtained results of deformation from it.
Project
12 | P a g e
Save Project After Solution No
Contents
• Units
• Model (A4) o Geometry
Solid o Coordinate Systems o Mesh
o Static Structural (A5)
Analysis Settings
Loads
Solution (A6)
Solution Information
Results
• Material Data
13 | P a g e
o Structural Steel NL
Units
TABLE 1
Unit System Metric (mm, kg, N, s, mV, mA) Degrees rad/s Celsius
Angle Degrees
Temperature Celsius
Model (A4)
Geometry
TABLE 2
Model (A4) > Geometry
Definition
Source
Type DesignModeler
Bounding Box
Length X 103. mm
Length Y 106. mm
Length Z 500. mm
Properties
Mass 9.8613 kg
14 | P a g e
Scale Factor Value 1.
Statistics
Bodies 1
Active Bodies 1
Nodes 14775
Elements 2166
Parameters Yes
Parameter Key DS
Attributes No
Named Selections No
Material Properties No
Coordinate Systems No
Temporary Directory
TABLE 3
15 | P a g e
Model (A4) > Geometry > Parts
State Meshed
Graphics Properties
Visible Yes
Transparency 1
Definition
Suppressed No
Material
Bounding Box
Length X 103. mm
Length Y 106. mm
Length Z 500. mm
Properties
Mass 9.8613 kg
Centroid X -3.259e-015 mm
Centroid Y 53. mm
16 | P a g e
Centroid Z 250. mm
Statistics
Nodes 14775
Elements 2166
Coordinate Systems
TABLE 4
Model (A4) > Coordinate Systems > Coordinate System
Definition
Type Cartesian
Coordinate System ID 0.
Origin
Origin X 0. mm
Origin Y 0. mm
Origin Z 0. mm
Directional Vectors
X Axis Data [ 1. 0. 0. ]
Y Axis Data [ 0. 1. 0. ]
Z Axis Data [ 0. 0. 1. ]
Mesh
TABLE 5
17 | P a g e
Model (A4) > Mesh
State Solved
Display
Defaults
Relevance 0
Sizing
Smoothing Medium
Transition Fast
Inflation
Maximum Layers 5
18 | P a g e
Patch Conforming Options
Topology Checking No
Advanced
Defeaturing
Statistics
Nodes 14775
Elements 2166
19 | P a g e
State Solved
Definition
Options
TABLE 7
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Analysis Settings
Step Controls
Number Of Steps 1.
Solver Controls
Restart Controls
20 | P a g e
Retain Files After Full Solve No
Nonlinear Controls
Stabilization Off
Output Controls
Stress Yes
Strain Yes
Nodal Forces No
Contact Miscellaneous No
General Miscellaneous No
Save MAPDL db No
TABLE 8
21 | P a g e
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Loads
Scope
Geometry 1 Face
Definition
Suppressed No
Define By Normal To
Tabular Data
Independent Variable Z
Graph Controls
X-Axis Z
FIGURE 1
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Pressure
22 | P a g e
TABLE 9
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Pressure
0. 0.
500. 4.
Solution (A6)
TABLE 10
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Solution
State Solved
Refinement Depth 2.
Information
Status Done
Post Processing
TABLE 11
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Solution (A6) > Solution Information
State Solved
Solution Information
Newton-Raphson Residuals 0
23 | P a g e
FE Connection Visibility
Visible on Results No
TABLE 12
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Solution (A6) > Results
Scope
Definition
Identifier
Suppressed No
Results
24 | P a g e
Minimum 0. mm 3.5905e-003 MPa 3.7074e-008 mm/mm
Information
Time 1. s
Load Step 1
Substep 4
Iteration Number 5
Average Across No
Bodies
FIGURE 2
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Solution (A6) > Total Deformation
TABLE 13
25 | P a g e
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Solution (A6) > Total Deformation
0.2 0. 0.24086
0.4 0.48172
0.7 0.84301
1. 1.206
FIGURE 3
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Solution (A6) > Equivalent Stress
TABLE 14
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Solution (A6) > Equivalent Stress
1. 3.5905e-003 301.06
FIGURE 4
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Solution (A6) > Equivalent Elastic Strain
26 | P a g e
TABLE 15
Model (A4) > Static Structural (A5) > Solution (A6) > Equivalent Elastic Strain
1. 3.7074e-008 1.5095e-003
Material Data
Structural Steel NL
TABLE 16
Structural Steel NL > Constants
TABLE 17
Structural Steel NL > Isotropic Elasticity
TABLE 18
Structural Steel NL > Bilinear Isotropic Hardening
27 | P a g e
Yield Strength MPa Tangent Modulus MPa Temperature C
250 1450
28 | P a g e